> "The UN-backed report underscores the urgent need for consumers, companies and governments to rein in excessive consumption – particularly of beef – and for farmers to draw back from conversions of forests and wetlands, according to the authors."
Land degradation threatens human wellbeing, major report warns https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/mar/26/land-degradation-is-undermining-human-wellbeing-un-report-warns
- Guccifer 2.0 story relies entirely on the usual anonymous sources
- dailybeast broke the story and Chelsea Clinton sits on the board of their parent company IAC http://iac.com/about/leadership/board-directors/chelsea-clinton https://www.marketwatch.com/story/daily-beast-parent-iac-beats-quarterly-expectations-2017-02-01 for all we know, the anonymous source was Hillary Clinton.
- IP addresses are easy to spoof and therefore do not mean much
- It seems unlikely that the GRU internet access would have IPs pointing back to them
- if the GRU is supposed the Russian version of the NSA, then it seems unlikely that anybody could just accidentally forget to turn on the VPN. There would be a dozen safeguards to prevent that from happening.
- unconfirmed: Guccifer 2.0 only claimed to have hacked Podesta, not DNC
- DNC refuses to have it's servers examined by any US government intel agency
- Research Shows Guccifer 2.0 Files Were Copied Locally Suggesting DNC Not "Hacked By Russians" https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-07-10/new-research-shows-guccifer-20-files-were-copied-locally-dnc-not-hacked-russians
- NSA experts say DNC "hack" wasn’t a hack at all, but a leak https://www.thenation.com/article/a-new-report-raises-big-questions-about-last-years-dnc-hack/
- Do we have an actual physical person? Somebody with a real name and face? If not, then all roads lead nowhere
Research Shows Guccifer 2.0 Files Were Copied Locally Suggesting DNC Not "Hacked By Russians" https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-07-10/new-research-shows-guccifer-20-files-were-copied-locally-dnc-not-hacked-russians
>> So.. I'm wondering.. Why do we care about the DNC getting hacked at this point? What difference at this point does it make?
> Because our worry isn't that Trump gets caught for conspiring with a foreign power to win an election, our worry is he gets away with it and then he pulls the same thing again in 2020.
By that reasoning shouldn't Hillary be investigated over the Benghazi scandal?
If the GRU is supposed the Russian version of the NSA, then it seems unlikely that anybody could just accidentally forget to turn on the VPN. There would be a dozen safeguards to prevent that from happening.
1) The story comes from the usual anonymous sources.
2) I think the dailybeast broke the story and I have read that Chelsea Clinton sits on the board of their parent company ICY
3) unconfirmed: Guccifer 2.0 only claimed to have hacked Podesta, not DNC
4) Research Shows Guccifer 2.0 Files Were Copied Locally Suggesting DNC Not "Hacked By Russians" https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-07-10/new-research-shows-guccifer-20-files-were-copied-locally-dnc-not-hacked-russians
5) NSA experts say DNC "hack" wasn’t a hack at all, but a leak https://www.thenation.com/article/a-new-report-raises-big-questions-about-last-years-dnc-hack/
Slashdot Mirror
> You need H1B workers.
No we don't.
> The visa kids are the ones who have their name on patents, and have a stupidly disproportionate number of phd candidates among them
No they are not. We already have the O-1 visa for the exceptional talented.
I doubt that bringing back Carolina Parakeets, or Passenger Pigeons, would have the same risks as bringing back a T-Rex.
BTW: Jurassic Park was run stupidly. The dinosaurs should be kept in deep pits. Zoos have been doing this for over a century.
> Going extinct is the natural way of things
Sometimes, not always.
> We're just another animal, really.
Things like nuclear power plants are not a part of nature. Don't be ridiculous.
> What makes death by man any less natural than death by any other predator?
Oh come on. Passenger Pigeons were the common bird in North America, maybe the world.
Humans drove them into extinction in a very short period of time.
Saying nature selected these birds for extinction is absurd.
After a while people just shrug and say "so what? *Everything* causes cancer."
Cigarettes cause cancer? So what? Everything causes cancer.
My understanding is: they have tried this in Germany, and it has turned out to be astronomically expensive. Energy costs have gone through the roof.
Of course the USA is only a small part part of the earth's land area.
Still, I agree: 75% seems like an overestimate.
> "The UN-backed report underscores the urgent need for consumers, companies and governments to rein in excessive consumption – particularly of beef – and for farmers to draw back from conversions of forests and wetlands, according to the authors."
Land degradation threatens human wellbeing, major report warns
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/mar/26/land-degradation-is-undermining-human-wellbeing-un-report-warns
Zuck has made his billions and sold his stocks. What does he care?
Prison for what exactly?
Please be very specific. Please provide evidence and cite your source.
- Guccifer 2.0 story relies entirely on the usual anonymous sources
- dailybeast broke the story and Chelsea Clinton sits on the board of their parent company IAC
http://iac.com/about/leadership/board-directors/chelsea-clinton
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/daily-beast-parent-iac-beats-quarterly-expectations-2017-02-01
for all we know, the anonymous source was Hillary Clinton.
- IP addresses are easy to spoof and therefore do not mean much
- It seems unlikely that the GRU internet access would have IPs pointing back to them
- if the GRU is supposed the Russian version of the NSA, then it seems unlikely that anybody could just accidentally forget to turn on the VPN. There would be a dozen safeguards to prevent that from happening.
- unconfirmed: Guccifer 2.0 only claimed to have hacked Podesta, not DNC
- DNC refuses to have it's servers examined by any US government intel agency
- Research Shows Guccifer 2.0 Files Were Copied Locally Suggesting DNC Not "Hacked By Russians"
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-07-10/new-research-shows-guccifer-20-files-were-copied-locally-dnc-not-hacked-russians
- NSA experts say DNC "hack" wasn’t a hack at all, but a leak
https://www.thenation.com/article/a-new-report-raises-big-questions-about-last-years-dnc-hack/
- Do we have an actual physical person? Somebody with a real name and face? If not, then all roads lead nowhere
> Patreus was head of the CIA and was dumb enough . . .
Being the head of the CIA does not make you a top-level Spy super-hacker. Typically the head of the CIA is a not a techie.
> Source?
Research Shows Guccifer 2.0 Files Were Copied Locally Suggesting DNC Not "Hacked By Russians"
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-07-10/new-research-shows-guccifer-20-files-were-copied-locally-dnc-not-hacked-russians
>> So.. I'm wondering.. Why do we care about the DNC getting hacked at this point? What difference at this point does it make?
> Because our worry isn't that Trump gets caught for conspiring with a foreign power to win an election, our worry is he gets away with it and then he pulls the same thing again in 2020.
By that reasoning shouldn't Hillary be investigated over the Benghazi scandal?
If the GRU is supposed the Russian version of the NSA, then it seems unlikely that anybody could just accidentally forget to turn on the VPN. There would be a dozen safeguards to prevent that from happening.
Hardly a "hack" more of a leak.
All Seth had to do was copy a .pst file to a USB stick and send that to wikileaks. Seth had access, there would be nothing to it.
No hack, no conspiracy.
Seth had motive to that also. Seth was Bernie supporter, and was understandable unhappy to see Bernie robbed of the nomination.
The Seth theory is actually the anti-conspiracy theory. The Russia theory is the far-fetched conspiracy theory - especially if it involves Trump.
Is there any evidence to see?
1) The story comes from the usual anonymous sources.
2) I think the dailybeast broke the story and I have read that Chelsea Clinton sits on the board of their parent company ICY
3) unconfirmed: Guccifer 2.0 only claimed to have hacked Podesta, not DNC
4) Research Shows Guccifer 2.0 Files Were Copied Locally Suggesting DNC Not "Hacked By Russians"
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-07-10/new-research-shows-guccifer-20-files-were-copied-locally-dnc-not-hacked-russians
5) NSA experts say DNC "hack" wasn’t a hack at all, but a leak
https://www.thenation.com/article/a-new-report-raises-big-questions-about-last-years-dnc-hack/
2) Podesta email hack, spearfishing attack but his email password was "password". If I remember right, THIS is the hack Guiccifer 2.0 took credit for.
Do you have a source on that?
Somebody we can exonerate, and put under oath? Somebody who can be put in prison if any of this is true?
board.
Or so I've read.
https://medium.com/@jashobell/the-daily-beast-is-owned-by-iac-and-chelsea-clinton-sits-on-their-board-of-directors-d6978d1e9ee5
> Remember, it's illegal to hire foreign nationals directly.
Remember: Christopher Steele is a foreign national.
You clearly do not not know what the word "treason" means.
Please feel free to cite your source about Trump's capital crime.
Or maybe they're just bitcoin investors?
Image people jumping to that conclusion just because of three decades of bad behaviour.
What did anybody expect? How naive can you be?