You made an inference. A really weak one. You seem to think it's a strong inference. I'd look into that if I were you. It's probably going to cause you to believe all sorts of shit that isn't true (but maybe you like believing it, so it's OK?).
I don't give a flying fuck what article is on that page, it's Mercola, his site exists to generate income for him and no other reason. So either link the study directly or GTFO.
So it's another facade to gather increasingly detailed and intrusive personal and demographic data. Wonder what the ROI is he pitched to his investors?
The Bible isn't a mystery. It's an accurate and reliable guide to human history and future events provided by someone who knows what has happened because he was there and knows what will happen because he will be there and will make it happen. Everyone would do well to heed its counsel.
The bible is a disgraceful, meandering, weird pile of shit written by obnoxious, lying, power hungry little creeps. It belongs in the dark ages where it came from.
There's another way to characterise invoking 'god' in science. It's called 'giving up'. Besides, there are thousands of purported gods, and all are about equally probable.
If physics is considered a form of life, then we'd also have to consider global warming to be a form of life. This of course raises a serious problem: if we try to stop global warming, then we're potentially killing a very unique and special form of life.
They are probably talking about 'strong' domain-independent AI, that is better than humans at most or all cognitive tasks. It doesn't exist and it may not for a long time. But when it does, it will need to be managed properly.
He hasn't had much credibility even in physics for several decades. The last time he was able to stir any kind of passion was when he said information was permanently destroyed in black holes. Leonard Susskind, among others, showed him to be wrong, and there hasn't been much of anything since.
With some technologies, we plan improperly, make mistakes, and learn from those mistakes. With certain AI scenarios, we don't get to make mistakes. It is qualitatively different.
Slashdot Mirror
Don't. Give. A. Fuck.
Sorry.
That's a big pile of shit you just wrote. I should browse at +1 so I don't need to read further stupidity.
Wait times and all, I would never swap for your barbaric system. Yours would work if the healthcare was priced reasonably. It isn't. Not even close.
That's easy when you got a winning ticket in life's lottery...
Nah, people like that give luck zero credit. Everything was down to their 'hard work'.
You made an inference. A really weak one. You seem to think it's a strong inference. I'd look into that if I were you. It's probably going to cause you to believe all sorts of shit that isn't true (but maybe you like believing it, so it's OK?).
Any kind of age-related technology will involve a gate-keeping price that well and truly keeps the plebs out.
I am an old person
I doubt it. More likely, you're a really crappy troll, but still apparently good enough to fool lots of people here. So well done I suppose.
Let's hope he doesn't mean "do lots of sudoku" because that's a crock of shit.
I don't give a flying fuck what article is on that page, it's Mercola, his site exists to generate income for him and no other reason. So either link the study directly or GTFO.
What are you linking a crank website for?
Got a Natural News link?
lol.
So it's another facade to gather increasingly detailed and intrusive personal and demographic data. Wonder what the ROI is he pitched to his investors?
Yawn. Post proof or shut the fuck up.
Yes and Orcs die if you splash them with water.
The Bible isn't a mystery. It's an accurate and reliable guide to human history and future events provided by someone who knows what has happened because he was there and knows what will happen because he will be there and will make it happen. Everyone would do well to heed its counsel.
The bible is a disgraceful, meandering, weird pile of shit written by obnoxious, lying, power hungry little creeps. It belongs in the dark ages where it came from.
There's another way to characterise invoking 'god' in science. It's called 'giving up'. Besides, there are thousands of purported gods, and all are about equally probable.
How strong is your 'faith' that Zeus doesn't exist?
Another one of these 'not collecting stamps is a hobby!' dickheads.
Your god was dreamt up by bronze age goat herders. Grow the fuck up.
If physics is considered a form of life, then we'd also have to consider global warming to be a form of life. This of course raises a serious problem: if we try to stop global warming, then we're potentially killing a very unique and special form of life.
The stupidity of this comment physically hurts.
So, don't cross a bridge? Don't go in a house? Don't walk on a pavement?
Where the fuck are you writing this from?
Ever forged an emotional connection with a polio virus? Let me know how you get on.
Oh look, an 'evolution is a religion' idiot. Safe to ignore.
An encrypted volume or file is not a house, it never was a house, and it never will be a fucking house. The analogy is fucking stupid, stop using it.
Your sig is so fucking stupid it gave me cancer. "When Fascism comes to American". Jesus. Give up.
So why should we sign on to something that does not benefit us, or is even "fair"?
Maintaining the current biosphere doesn't "benefit" this clown. Stupid cunt really, just like all climate denying dickheads.
They are probably talking about 'strong' domain-independent AI, that is better than humans at most or all cognitive tasks. It doesn't exist and it may not for a long time. But when it does, it will need to be managed properly.
He hasn't had much credibility even in physics for several decades. The last time he was able to stir any kind of passion was when he said information was permanently destroyed in black holes. Leonard Susskind, among others, showed him to be wrong, and there hasn't been much of anything since.
With some technologies, we plan improperly, make mistakes, and learn from those mistakes. With certain AI scenarios, we don't get to make mistakes. It is qualitatively different.