Was raised catholic, never heard anything remotely like this. I suspect you're full of shit, much like catholicism itself. (Spell check wants me to make that a capital C. lol, fuck off.)
PhD in biochemistry here. Unguided evolution isn't something I believe in either. In fact, my thesis touched on intelligent design. Luckily, my supervisory committee had two Seventh Day Adventists on it.
Let's hope you have enough sense to separate your private belief in fairy tales from your professional work.
If he added the qualifier "outside the US" he would be right. Having quite so many believers in fairy tales is largely your problem. Thank fuck the rest of the world is smarter.
That 35th world ranking for maths for the USA is now looking like nirvana.
Yeah, government schools aren't very good. So you should definitely freak out if anyone tries to change anything about them.
By "change anything" you mean "weaken standards". Yeah, give that a go mate. Enjoy your plummeting education standards. The rest of the world is laughing at your dumb asses.
Having a class that teaches all religions would be perfect. But they won't ever do that because there is an implicit message when you do that.... "These are all equally full of shit"
I have little doubt that the intention behind this is to erode science teaching and replace it with teaching fairy tales as fact. "cDesign Proponentists" have to operate in this oblique way because you still technically have separation of church and state.
I think it was roughly 'I used to be an ignorant atheist but now am an enlighted spirtiualist who disagrees with science about the animal nature of man and consciousness'.
Slashdot Mirror
While this is funny, chances are that most violently anti-pedos are indeed closet-pedos. It works this way for every other sexual orientation.
Kinda like how Pat Robertson is a raging homosexual? Kinda makes sense doesn't it.
find out if having childlike sex dolls are a stepping stone to abusing real children
Can you give a general outline of how to make such study that can demonstrate causality and get past ethics committee?
I'll take "what is an observational study" for 100 please Alex
Was raised catholic, never heard anything remotely like this. I suspect you're full of shit, much like catholicism itself. (Spell check wants me to make that a capital C. lol, fuck off.)
We don't need to find out, this is slashdot. Everybody already knows.
Ah, the slippery slope fallacy, beloved of idiots.
Funny how economists are just as shit at predicting what the economy will do as anybody else. I rarely see this pointed out for some reason.
Red pill indeed. What a pile of bollocks, lol.
ISPs can literally sell your browsing info to whoever the fuck they like? And this is somehow a problem but that isn't? Weird.
I bet you think Walter Peck was a ghostbuster. You are a dopey cunt mate.
To be fair, most burger flippers can read at an adult level. The comparison to Trump is unfair on them.
PhD in biochemistry here. Unguided evolution isn't something I believe in either. In fact, my thesis touched on intelligent design. Luckily, my supervisory committee had two Seventh Day Adventists on it.
Let's hope you have enough sense to separate your private belief in fairy tales from your professional work.
If he added the qualifier "outside the US" he would be right. Having quite so many believers in fairy tales is largely your problem. Thank fuck the rest of the world is smarter.
Too obvious. Crappy troll. 1/10.
Math is the language of science.
The wrong answer they will be taught is "god did it". Over and over and over.
How many answers are you getting for the gravitational constant there buddeh?
This is either quite a good troll, or an idiot. I'm actually thinking the former. Bravo.
That 35th world ranking for maths for the USA is now looking like nirvana.
Yeah, government schools aren't very good. So you should definitely freak out if anyone tries to change anything about them.
By "change anything" you mean "weaken standards". Yeah, give that a go mate. Enjoy your plummeting education standards. The rest of the world is laughing at your dumb asses.
"The whole world should speak like me because the way I speak is the bestest" - You're a twat.
lol. That's the second time I've seen you go in for that arguing tactic in this thread. Pretty weak stuff, man.
Having a class that teaches all religions would be perfect. But they won't ever do that because there is an implicit message when you do that.... "These are all equally full of shit"
It's a science class. Question evolution all you like in fairy tale/religion class. Creationism should be beneath contempt to any thinking individual.
I have little doubt that the intention behind this is to erode science teaching and replace it with teaching fairy tales as fact. "cDesign Proponentists" have to operate in this oblique way because you still technically have separation of church and state.
I think it was roughly 'I used to be an ignorant atheist but now am an enlighted spirtiualist who disagrees with science about the animal nature of man and consciousness'.
Evidence offered: 0.
TLDR use paragraphs.
Yes, but that's how you were able to post here.
Let me help you out here bud. One of these things is a website for neckbeards, and the other is a system tasked with educating children.
They are different.