I never foresaw how many characters each player would create. It seems that having a dozen or more 'alts' (alternate characters) is the norm, rather than the extreme. People love making lots of different heroes - and lots of costumes.
That's because that's where the most fun is in the game - creating a charachter. As opposed to where the fun SHOULD be - playing the game.
patches are not installed automatically via the windowsupdate website, nor 'automatic updating' in windows me/2k/xp. the user still has to accept the installation.
The attempt to rank vendors according to their security success rate is a risky business. The aim of most virus writers is usually for their worm to achieve its biggest impact, and so will target platforms that are widely used. "Microsoft is targetted as it is so popular, rather than the system being the least secure," said Cluley.
"Then I must conclude that there are twice as many worms developed for Apache, than IIS. I feel sorry for all you poor Apache users. Your worm problems haven't received nearly as much publicity and sympathy. It must be a conspiracy."
Codered = All 2000 and NT/IIS.
SirCam/Nimda = Effects all Windows versions.
This isn't about Apache vs IIS. It's about Windows (70%?) vs everything else(5%, 5%, 5%, 5%...?) out there. Which is more popular?
For example, has Apache even managed to deliver a standard GUI configuration tool in all this time
Personally, I find the straight forward Apache configuration much easier than the IIS config.
What would a user rather have -- a free server that does plain webserving, or a moderately priced one that does webserving plus e-commerce? Faced with such an adversary, does a plain webserver stand a chance, much less one that is virtually stagnant? True, the dramatic drop in Apache's market share comes from just two large ISPs, but will they be the only ones to switch?
Much of the article takes about IIS's integration. I'll install several packages thank you. If you look a little, you can find up-to-date scripts that get and install a miriad of packages together. Oh, yeah, and rpms and apt-get.
The guys at [H]ardOCP addressed this issue. Look under Sunday, April 15, 2001 - Ed 2.
"We have never seen nor heard of the CPU throttling being active on any person's CPU and certainly have not experienced it ourselves (unless we FORCED it to happen) under conditions more strenuous than 99.9% of the P4s in the field will ever encounter. I do not suggest that DIYers or hobbyist go the P4 route if they want to buy a system for themselves, but bashing it on this front is simply bad journalism and transparent to many people."
Sorry, I don't know of a way to direct link to an article on their site...
I completly agree. Many people are linking to the advanced search. However, the only usable "advanced" option there is the choice of language (which didn't seem to work for me). The new, hopefully temporary, interface is useless tripe.
I am a sysadmin at a school. And what he says is true. However, the _only_ reason this happens is becase the users associate Netscape with the web (Netscape = Internet). Put a big blue E on their desktop and take away netscape, and they don't know what the hell to do. Furthurmore, I can't see why any reputable company would use Netscape Messenger for a email client. Other than the above reason, it's only cause they're too cheap to foot the bill for some nice collaboration software like Lotus Notes, or Exchange.
What a cop out. And AOL needs money???
AOL didn't purcase Netscape to make money, there was no chance, the battle was already over at that time. They purchased it hoping that it would turn out just good enough to bundle with AOL. They purchased it to save money.
Can't believe this got moderated up.
Newer Windows versions already have a system similar to what you mentioned.
New windows blink that are not in focus, or the foreground. Also, any program that has a start -> finish path, usually will tell you when it's finished. As far as DOS windows, when a batch file, or something similar finishes, it says "Finished" in the title bar.
Oh yeah, and there is always the blue screen when something stops.
Slashdot Mirror
http://discovermagazine.com/2006/may/tramps-like-us
I never foresaw how many characters each player would create. It seems that having a dozen or more 'alts' (alternate characters) is the norm, rather than the extreme. People love making lots of different heroes - and lots of costumes.
That's because that's where the most fun is in the game - creating a charachter. As opposed to where the fun SHOULD be - playing the game.
If there's a lot of packages maintained often and well for whatever OS I'm using, I see no reason to go with source.
However, if there isn't a package available, or it's out of date, obviously I have to go with source.
anyone remember if things were this ridiculous the last time the economy went down the toilet?
patches are not installed automatically via the windowsupdate website, nor 'automatic updating' in windows me/2k/xp. the user still has to accept the installation.
I use phpaccelerator. I do some moderately advanced things with php, and it works great. I've had no problems with it.
So, it doesn't have a hard drive, and you can't record anything you want?
If so, there website is full of crap.
Sure, blame it on the other guy...
Too bad we will have to pay for their idiocy.
What's the big deal? It's public domain now, isn't it? What if you take a screenshot?
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=24415&cid=2649 680
Last I heard, it does have a central server; although not in the same sense that Napster did.
m l
Check here:http://gift.sourceforge.net/press_9_29_01.ht
http://www.microsoft.com
If two companies claim to have a pantent on the same technology, I see no better reason for it to be pantent-free.
Codered = All 2000 and NT/IIS.
SirCam/Nimda = Effects all Windows versions.
This isn't about Apache vs IIS. It's about Windows (70%?) vs everything else(5%, 5%, 5%, 5%...?) out there. Which is more popular?
For example, has Apache even managed to deliver a standard GUI configuration tool in all this time
Personally, I find the straight forward Apache configuration much easier than the IIS config.
What would a user rather have -- a free server that does plain webserving, or a moderately priced one that does webserving plus e-commerce? Faced with such an adversary, does a plain webserver stand a chance, much less one that is virtually stagnant? True, the dramatic drop in Apache's market share comes from just two large ISPs, but will they be the only ones to switch?
Much of the article takes about IIS's integration. I'll install several packages thank you. If you look a little, you can find up-to-date scripts that get and install a miriad of packages together. Oh, yeah, and rpms and apt-get.
Then it ends up to ba a pro J2EE article...
I think this is the correct link: http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2001/8/8/53543/46803
Alien vs Predator. Scariest game I've ever played.
The guys at [H]ardOCP addressed this issue. Look under Sunday, April 15, 2001 - Ed 2. "We have never seen nor heard of the CPU throttling being active on any person's CPU and certainly have not experienced it ourselves (unless we FORCED it to happen) under conditions more strenuous than 99.9% of the P4s in the field will ever encounter. I do not suggest that DIYers or hobbyist go the P4 route if they want to buy a system for themselves, but bashing it on this front is simply bad journalism and transparent to many people." Sorry, I don't know of a way to direct link to an article on their site...
I completly agree. Many people are linking to the advanced search. However, the only usable "advanced" option there is the choice of language (which didn't seem to work for me). The new, hopefully temporary, interface is useless tripe.
I am a sysadmin at a school. And what he says is true.
However, the _only_ reason this happens is becase the users associate Netscape with the web (Netscape = Internet). Put a big blue E on their desktop and take away netscape, and they don't know what the hell to do.
Furthurmore, I can't see why any reputable company would use Netscape Messenger for a email client. Other than the above reason, it's only cause they're too cheap to foot the bill for some nice collaboration software like Lotus Notes, or Exchange.
What a cop out. And AOL needs money???
AOL didn't purcase Netscape to make money, there was no chance, the battle was already over at that time. They purchased it hoping that it would turn out just good enough to bundle with AOL. They purchased it to save money.
Can't believe this got moderated up.
Newer Windows versions already have a system similar to what you mentioned.
New windows blink that are not in focus, or the foreground. Also, any program that has a start -> finish path, usually will tell you when it's finished. As far as DOS windows, when a batch file, or something similar finishes, it says "Finished" in the title bar.
Oh yeah, and there is always the blue screen when something stops.