So, you, bright kid, are not even able to recognize the inconsistency of your own speech???
Let me help you:
1.Is the system perfect? Clearly not, and Google recognizes that and is constantly looking for ways to improve it......In any language (even computer one), this sentence is saying the the system is not perfect. Translated, it happens that Google hires stupid kids. Translated, the amount of hired stupid kids is big enough to be recognized as a problem, and to force them to improve the system.
2.my experience as a Google employee is that there are very, very few bad hires.......So, you are saying that there are very very very few bad hires, which translated means that the system is working pretty well, so there is no need to repair it.....
So, let me ask you as developer to developer: Is the system not perfect? (TRUE=1, FALSE=2). In any case (TRUE or FALSE), why do you insist that both of them are TRUE?
Do you happen to implement some 3rd logical state, existing only in your mind (and some quantum physics theories)?
I did read your sentence 10 times, and i still don't know what you are saying!!!!
YES, i got it, you disagree with the 11 axioms, so feel free to invent your own .
it is not 250 GIGA BYTES, it is 250 GIGA BITS
OR: 250/8 GIGA BYTES = 31.25 GIGA BYTES
OR if they are so nasty, it is not GIGA (1024) but Ge(1000)
OR 250 GIGA BITS = 29.10 GB.......
I hope now that you know what is the difference between bits, bytes, giga, mega kilo.......
No no no and no.
When i turn the light ON, it always turns ON.
Can you prove me please, that if i always turn the light ON, the bulb will actually produce some light???????
If i call the switch "Quantum black matter", do you really think that it is actually a quantum black matter?????
Actually, winning the Desktop war will be the biggest loss for the FSF. At end of the day, linux and open source is not about restricting you to only one OS (linux), but giving you the right to make a choice (linux/windows/mac/whatever.....). So, linux, please, don't win that war.
That is very sad observation, but sooooo true. We really need to have our own professional organization (but not the so called "networking") made by professionals, for professionals. We need our codex, our credo, our standards even, but it is not going to happen (sooo sad).
Just let me give you one example of what IT-pro means. Every time i start a new job, they usually give you 3 months to prove yourself, but my experience shows that even 1 month is pretty much enough for everything. If you need 3 months to evaluate your new coworker, then you better go find a new job (translated: 90% of the so called IT-pros should never be allowed to touch a computer, ever)
My current office location is just next to my home, and It is amazing how much more time i have now... And yes, i did accept a less generous salary compared to some other jobs, but with a longer commute time.
When i go to the common night bars, i know exactly what i want to drink, but i am stuck with their windows (i mean menu). That's why the ones that are able to mix my choice of ingredients are my favorites, and btw they are the best place to impress a lady (say linux). With other words, GUI is for dumbs. Period.
It is funny that you mentioned the nowadays cars, because all the ECU are programmed on if not assembler, then PURE C, with a lot of restriction, like for example:
Rule zzz: DO NOT USE DEFINE.
So, again, can you imagine what could be if you car software is written on C++? (i could, believe me you don't wanna to drive such a car).
In fact, if you are not EXTREMELY good in OO, then no one will got the slightest idea of what your OO code is, and why it is working at all (if it is working at all of course)...
My 6 cents: Make a program, exactly 6 bytes long, testing whether one and only one bit is set. Please, do it in 15 minutes, or you will fail.
I wonder how many female human beings do you happen to have in your special, white, boy-scout Stanford' grades.....
So, you, bright kid, are not even able to recognize the inconsistency of your own speech??? Let me help you: 1.Is the system perfect? Clearly not, and Google recognizes that and is constantly looking for ways to improve it......In any language (even computer one), this sentence is saying the the system is not perfect. Translated, it happens that Google hires stupid kids. Translated, the amount of hired stupid kids is big enough to be recognized as a problem, and to force them to improve the system. 2.my experience as a Google employee is that there are very, very few bad hires.......So, you are saying that there are very very very few bad hires, which translated means that the system is working pretty well, so there is no need to repair it..... So, let me ask you as developer to developer: Is the system not perfect? (TRUE=1, FALSE=2). In any case (TRUE or FALSE), why do you insist that both of them are TRUE? Do you happen to implement some 3rd logical state, existing only in your mind (and some quantum physics theories)?
I don't know if he/she has a penis or pussy, but you are definitely lacking both of them.
Who wants sub at all????
I did read your sentence 10 times, and i still don't know what you are saying!!!! YES, i got it, you disagree with the 11 axioms, so feel free to invent your own .
You forgot their most advanced invention: APPLE.
it is not 250 GIGA BYTES, it is 250 GIGA BITS OR: 250/8 GIGA BYTES = 31.25 GIGA BYTES OR if they are so nasty, it is not GIGA (1024) but Ge(1000) OR 250 GIGA BITS = 29.10 GB....... I hope now that you know what is the difference between bits, bytes, giga, mega kilo.......
No no no and no. When i turn the light ON, it always turns ON. Can you prove me please, that if i always turn the light ON, the bulb will actually produce some light??????? If i call the switch "Quantum black matter", do you really think that it is actually a quantum black matter?????
Explain me please the 11th axiom. And please prove it. In our universe...................Still waiting
Are you saying that i MUST develop!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Is this what you are calling CHOICE?????
Nope. There is no reason they have to tell her that she is not hired because of her burka..........Simple, ain't?
Finally everybody would want to work with sea-pig....i mean woman-developer. Are these guys going to open an office in Canada? :P
It is funny that you are actually saying: Don't make any choice (vote for politician)....
Actually, winning the Desktop war will be the biggest loss for the FSF. At end of the day, linux and open source is not about restricting you to only one OS (linux), but giving you the right to make a choice (linux/windows/mac/whatever.....). So, linux, please, don't win that war.
That is very sad observation, but sooooo true. We really need to have our own professional organization (but not the so called "networking") made by professionals, for professionals. We need our codex, our credo, our standards even, but it is not going to happen (sooo sad). Just let me give you one example of what IT-pro means. Every time i start a new job, they usually give you 3 months to prove yourself, but my experience shows that even 1 month is pretty much enough for everything. If you need 3 months to evaluate your new coworker, then you better go find a new job (translated: 90% of the so called IT-pros should never be allowed to touch a computer, ever)
I see, your kid is the perfect private. Congrats. At least now we could start 10 more stupid wars.
My current office location is just next to my home, and It is amazing how much more time i have now... And yes, i did accept a less generous salary compared to some other jobs, but with a longer commute time.
When i go to the common night bars, i know exactly what i want to drink, but i am stuck with their windows (i mean menu). That's why the ones that are able to mix my choice of ingredients are my favorites, and btw they are the best place to impress a lady (say linux). With other words, GUI is for dumbs. Period.
I am a happy TekSavy's customer. And because i like how it sounds, F............. you Rogers/Bell
It is funny that you mentioned the nowadays cars, because all the ECU are programmed on if not assembler, then PURE C, with a lot of restriction, like for example: Rule zzz: DO NOT USE DEFINE. So, again, can you imagine what could be if you car software is written on C++? (i could, believe me you don't wanna to drive such a car).
Try to use some more complicated template, make some unconscious mistake, and then try to find out at runtime WTF the error message means!!!!!
How? How do you do parallel programing using OOP??????????
In fact, if you are not EXTREMELY good in OO, then no one will got the slightest idea of what your OO code is, and why it is working at all (if it is working at all of course)...
Nope. Linux is NOT OO. Windows is NOT OO. Apple's OS is NOT OO. OS2 is OO, but is extinct.... BeOS is OO but is also extinct..................