if conservatives believe saying Jews should die, that only white men should be in power, that women deserve to be raped, then sure, why not. Because that is what you'll find there.
So why is it that conservatives are big supporters of Israel? Don't believe that white men should be in power, but the best person should be. Why not ask your local feminists, progressives, and liberals why they bend over backwards to defend Islam and the people who openly promote that raping women is acceptable. And openly protest against people, former muslims, and whatnot who are trying to reform Islam.
Why not ask twitter why they have verified terrorist groups operating on their platform, but nobody seems to care about that.
Let's be real here. This is all about Donald Trump's vile and hateful bigotry and conspiracy theories put into practice by his supporters.
Really? So, the guy hated Trump and it's still Trump's fault. That's brilliant reasoning. Well I guess Louis Farrakhan has more to do with this Trump does, especially with his open jew hatred. And of course all those democrats that promoted violence are 100% responsible for the ricin attacks a couple of weeks ago.
The President of the USA has encouraged his supporters to slaughter minorities and liberals and they are putting his words into action.
Can't help but wonder how you get through life being this stupid. Well I suppose the other possibility is you're in such a big echo chamber you've got no clue what's actually going on around you.
Oh, and I also just realized, you probably don't understand which of 2 things "former" and "latter" refer to. They probably taught you that in school, too.
Apparently more so then you, otherwise you'd have added something constructive.
The reason they haven't also banned Twitter is that Twitter has a policy of not allowing that kind of thing on its network.
That's complete BS. Twitter allows multiple terrorist organizations to operate on there. They even have terrorist groups like the muslim brotherhood verified. It doesn't get much further in terms of extremism when you're talking about a group that wants to commit genocide because religion tells them to.
Good to hear. Now, explain why with the bomb case, the media is all over it saying it's Trump's fault. But when a democrat/progressive commits fake hate crimes, shoot people, try to kill members of congress. They aren't blaming the democrats.
Do you think Islamic terrorism or Christian terrorism is a bigger problem? I would say the former, personally, is currently a much bigger problem. Obviously, however, I'm against both.
In the last month there has been nearly 900 people killed in the name of islam. I can only find one person killed in the name of christianity, and it was in an african backwater. Let's be realistic here, there have been more buddhists killing people in the name of it, then there has been of christians.
Much in the same way, white supremacism is a much bigger problem than black supremacism. But yeah, I'm against both.
Really? So BLM which now has black supremacy in various facets of it's ideology, and is responsible for multiple homicides in the last years are the bigger problem?
I dunno what laws you think Democrats don't want enforced. Probably the ones that disenfranchise people you don't like voting. Unjust laws shouldn't be enforced, and should be resisted. The country was founded on that very idea. I'm not a Democrat, that's a personal conviction.
You mean like immigration laws? Cause there's a bunch of democrats that want to remove it, progressives too. Unjust laws, like voter ID that's granted by the government?
The US wasn't founded on unjust laws, it was founded on unjust taxation. Do they even teach you that in schools today?
LOL. "Chased by a leftwinger with a gun" ROFL. Holy crap that's laughable. You need to get back to your loonbin.
That's open evidence submitted to the court, there's also multiple news articles on it. Sure is showing how ignorant you are though, or perhaps your taste in news sources.
Strange, because democrats were doing this for years. Until Giffords got shot, then it was a political faux pas all of a sudden.
When a republican puts violent right wing memes spread by Trump and prominent republicans into action they deserve the blame.
No power no peace! - Hillary Clinton Get up in their faces wherever they are. - Maxine Waters When they go low, we kick them while they're down. - Eric Holder Violence against patriots is collateral damage. - Nancy Polosi Need more marching, blood and death in the streets - Loretta Lynch
And I'm only getting started. I'm also sure you think "violent rightwing memes" include pepe the frog, and the current NPC meme. But don't see calling peoples as nazi's, racists, fascists, white supremacists, race traitors, misogynists, and so on as a problem either.
Funny how you asswipes never complains about right wing terrorism, and always keep droning about "left wing terrorism" (which usually means writing articles you disagree with, or holding some sort of peaceful demonstration),
So beating the piss out of people is a peaceful demonstration? And openly advocating to destroy private and public property? Well anyone reasonable would agree that it's bad.
as soon as one of your nutters starts sending bombs,
Sorry, but you'd best look back a bit. Or did you forget the 1000 days of rage, and all those left wingers who were bombing the shit out of places?
or just simply starts running people over.
Oh talking about charllotsville? You mean guy who was chased by a leftwinger with a gun, and tried to flee?
Funny that. It's almost like there is some kind of double standard..
Funny is indeed the thing. It's almost like you don't think the left were the ones lining up and doing this from the get-go and using "rules for radicals" as an instruction manual.
Yeah too sad I guess in your world then, it's much easier to turn around and be handed information then it is to actually find it on your own and feeling a measure of success in learning about it as well.
Google is your first problem, enjoy your curated results.
Why don't you just try your favorite search engine. I'd suggest using the search phrase "extended 1st amendment protections." You'll learn something interesting...providing of course the search engine you picked isn't curating your results.
Against Nazis and white supremacists. Uh oh, slashdot didn't delete my comment, it must be biased too!
Are you biased against black supremacists? How about democrats that demand that laws shouldn't be enforced?
I mean, what are the chances that Nazis and KKK members are hated by most of society, and that it becomes reflected in a platform used by large portions of society?
Well that's a funny thing, because there's more black supremacists and communist agitators like BAMN, antifa and so on then actual nazi's or members of the KKK these days. Out of curiosity, are you against them as well? Twitter isn't.
Funny, I didn't hear you complaining about leftwing terrorism. You know like the democrat who shot up the congressional baseball game. Or the other democrat who sent ricin through the mail and tried to kill a bunch of people including Trump's kid. Oh yes, very "right wing terrorism." And sure didn't hear you whining about Holder saying "kick them when they're down." Or Waters telling people to get into the face of other people - funny how progressives and democrats suddenly started doing this right after she said it.
No no, it's ALLLLLLLLLLlllll right wing terrorism.
Doesn't actually matter if they're not a government entity. Twitter has testified that they consider themselves the "new public square" for political discussion. They promoted that as well. There's been a whole assload of cases on this whereby a company presents itself as a public square, 1st amendment rules apply.
So really it boils down to this: Either the 1st amendment rules apply, in which case they're far more broadly protected and so are people. Or it doesn't, in which case they're not only curating content, but the people allowed to post there. In which case CDA S.230 no longer apply and they become liable for anything posted there. The "reasonable" defense section only applies if they allow access but don't actively curate, something they stopped doing a few years ago, when they made the change of how people become verified and in turn stated that they support the views of the people who are verified. This again is something they've openly stated.
You mean the last account removals of people using the NPC meme, where twitter has refused to give any ban reason at all? But liberals and progressives were screeching that the NPC meme is 'dehumanizing' but conveniently forget that they've been labeling anyone who doesn't follow their ideology as nasi's, fascists, racists, sexists, homophobes, and chalk full of misogyny? And if you're a minority that doesn't agree, you're an uncle tom, house ni**er(enjoy the lameness filter), race traitor, white supremacist, and so on? And that's been going on for years at this point.
How very interesting is that rational. Yep, looks like liberals and progressives have diminished actual words of "bad people" to the point where nobody really gives a shit, except for the people that think just like them. *Insert joke here about NPC's following the same program.*
There were not communists everywhere. Most of the people accused of being communists and "un-American" were not. Innocent people lost everything because of the witch hunt.
Good example of someone who didn't read the Venona Papers or the declassified KGB archives. Your entire reasoning is like the person who says "Well the STASI didn't really do bad things..." except when the recovered files that weren't destroyed, showed that they "did very bad things," including murdering children to keep their parents in line.
You say SJWs are hunting and destroying their enemies, yet you think the guy who famously did just that on the flimsiest of evidence, often mere rumour or aggressive and unfair questioning, was right. McCarthy, the poster boy for paranoid delusions of conspiracies.
You were the one who brought up McCarthy, not me. I simply pointed out that he was right. Not only do the documents prove he was right, but in fact he had understated the problem of the infiltration by actual USSR agents.
Yep, sure. The loudest complainers are usually those who never have seen an actual SJW in their whole life. It is like with the actual neonazis screaming foreigners GTFO - they are the loudest in the areas where there are barely any foreigners in the first place.
Then I'm sure you can provide evidence of that can't you. I have a feeling I'll be in for a very long wait.
It's not "witch hunt culture", it's that politics is now post-truth.
It's not? So why in the UK are progressives doxing pro-brexit individuals? Why are progressives trying to dox and harass chinese immigrants in Canada, who became legal citizens for protesting against illegal immigration. Why are progressives in the US stating that "speech is violence" and then using word salad going after peoples jobs. Why did progressives try to dox and harass Lindsay Shepard for wanting to have an open immigration debate by having all sides including extremist views presented. What parts of those are post-truth? Inconvenient facts? That people are taking stances on issues and being harassed for it?
Very much not a "witch hunt culture" among the left.
And what does that have to do with the Linux Code of Conduct? What part of it is like a "1953 playbook of fuck insert race here"?
Read the comment chain slowly, then read it again.
The real problem is snowflakes who are triggered by the mere suggestion that they shouldn't be assholes all the time (part time is fine), and then assume that it's a giant conspiracy against their race and soon they will be the ones at the back of the bus.
Proving again that the left can't meme, if you don't want to look like an idiot don't use a meme you don't understand. You want to know what a snowflake is? Someone who can't handle rape law in a legal class, and demands that it be banned because they're offended.
Reminds me of McCarthyism - whatever was really there was dwarfed by the paranoia, the fear that SJWs are everywhere and anyone could be one.
Except McCarthy was right. It's not that the paranoia of SJW's are everywhere. They declare themselves loudly that they're such, that they're "fighting for social justice". It's the fact that they're having a negative impact on society and people have had enough. This isn't paranoia, when the self-proclaimed actors proudly cheer their actions and fucking people over. So, tell me. Which group is telling people that if you don't want illegals in your country you're: "Racist, sexist, homophobic, misandrist, xenophobes."
You can look at any business in the west and see how SJW's and their various allies have reduced the chances of female employment(you can thank metoo) for that one. You can see the destruction of historical monuments pushed by them. You can see their attempts to reduce free speech. You can see how they align themselves in support of violent actions against people who don't agree with their ideology. You can see them protesting VoterID laws, lawful immigration, cheering the banning of books.
Hey, you want to believe that they're nobodies by all means. But it's far harder to believe when they're in charge of the education system and telling teachers not to teach "How to kill a mockingbird" because racism.
They behave very much the same, but scream louder. Apparently, in their quest to be left alone they can't leave others alone.
So people who are having their speech, jobs, livelihoods, education chances, employment impacted by SJW's who are actually causing these problems in the first place.
Typical broken thinking, it's the person at the end of the chain that's impacted who's at fault. Not the person who's causing it.
Slashdot Mirror
if conservatives believe saying Jews should die, that only white men should be in power, that women deserve to be raped, then sure, why not. Because that is what you'll find there.
So why is it that conservatives are big supporters of Israel? Don't believe that white men should be in power, but the best person should be. Why not ask your local feminists, progressives, and liberals why they bend over backwards to defend Islam and the people who openly promote that raping women is acceptable. And openly protest against people, former muslims, and whatnot who are trying to reform Islam.
Why not ask twitter why they have verified terrorist groups operating on their platform, but nobody seems to care about that.
Let's be real here. This is all about Donald Trump's vile and hateful bigotry and conspiracy theories put into practice by his supporters.
Really? So, the guy hated Trump and it's still Trump's fault. That's brilliant reasoning. Well I guess Louis Farrakhan has more to do with this Trump does, especially with his open jew hatred. And of course all those democrats that promoted violence are 100% responsible for the ricin attacks a couple of weeks ago.
The President of the USA has encouraged his supporters to slaughter minorities and liberals and they are putting his words into action.
Can't help but wonder how you get through life being this stupid. Well I suppose the other possibility is you're in such a big echo chamber you've got no clue what's actually going on around you.
Oh, and I also just realized, you probably don't understand which of 2 things "former" and "latter" refer to. They probably taught you that in school, too.
Apparently more so then you, otherwise you'd have added something constructive.
Taxes are laws, genius.
No, taxes are not laws. Easy to show who's never taken a law class in their life.
The reason they haven't also banned Twitter is that Twitter has a policy of not allowing that kind of thing on its network.
That's complete BS. Twitter allows multiple terrorist organizations to operate on there. They even have terrorist groups like the muslim brotherhood verified. It doesn't get much further in terms of extremism when you're talking about a group that wants to commit genocide because religion tells them to.
Your image is shit. That isn't free speech, that's speech controlled by a person/people who's sensibilities are offended.
If you think there are more racist black people than racist white people,
Really? Why don't you go take a trip down memory lane and look at all of the people promoting "kill whitey" in say twitter.
Absolutely
Good to hear. Now, explain why with the bomb case, the media is all over it saying it's Trump's fault. But when a democrat/progressive commits fake hate crimes, shoot people, try to kill members of congress. They aren't blaming the democrats.
Do you think Islamic terrorism or Christian terrorism is a bigger problem? I would say the former, personally, is currently a much bigger problem. Obviously, however, I'm against both.
In the last month there has been nearly 900 people killed in the name of islam. I can only find one person killed in the name of christianity, and it was in an african backwater. Let's be realistic here, there have been more buddhists killing people in the name of it, then there has been of christians.
Much in the same way, white supremacism is a much bigger problem than black supremacism. But yeah, I'm against both.
Really? So BLM which now has black supremacy in various facets of it's ideology, and is responsible for multiple homicides in the last years are the bigger problem?
I dunno what laws you think Democrats don't want enforced. Probably the ones that disenfranchise people you don't like voting. Unjust laws shouldn't be enforced, and should be resisted. The country was founded on that very idea. I'm not a Democrat, that's a personal conviction.
You mean like immigration laws? Cause there's a bunch of democrats that want to remove it, progressives too. Unjust laws, like voter ID that's granted by the government?
The US wasn't founded on unjust laws, it was founded on unjust taxation. Do they even teach you that in schools today?
LOL. "Chased by a leftwinger with a gun" ROFL. Holy crap that's laughable. You need to get back to your loonbin.
That's open evidence submitted to the court, there's also multiple news articles on it. Sure is showing how ignorant you are though, or perhaps your taste in news sources.
Strange, because democrats were doing this for years. Until Giffords got shot, then it was a political faux pas all of a sudden.
When a republican puts violent right wing memes spread by Trump and prominent republicans into action they deserve the blame.
No power no peace! - Hillary Clinton
Get up in their faces wherever they are. - Maxine Waters
When they go low, we kick them while they're down. - Eric Holder
Violence against patriots is collateral damage. - Nancy Polosi
Need more marching, blood and death in the streets - Loretta Lynch
And I'm only getting started. I'm also sure you think "violent rightwing memes" include pepe the frog, and the current NPC meme. But don't see calling peoples as nazi's, racists, fascists, white supremacists, race traitors, misogynists, and so on as a problem either.
Funny how you asswipes never complains about right wing terrorism, and always keep droning about "left wing terrorism" (which usually means writing articles you disagree with, or holding some sort of peaceful demonstration),
So beating the piss out of people is a peaceful demonstration? And openly advocating to destroy private and public property? Well anyone reasonable would agree that it's bad.
as soon as one of your nutters starts sending bombs,
Sorry, but you'd best look back a bit. Or did you forget the 1000 days of rage, and all those left wingers who were bombing the shit out of places?
or just simply starts running people over.
Oh talking about charllotsville? You mean guy who was chased by a leftwinger with a gun, and tried to flee?
Funny that. It's almost like there is some kind of double standard..
Funny is indeed the thing. It's almost like you don't think the left were the ones lining up and doing this from the get-go and using "rules for radicals" as an instruction manual.
Yeah too sad I guess in your world then, it's much easier to turn around and be handed information then it is to actually find it on your own and feeling a measure of success in learning about it as well.
Google is your first problem, enjoy your curated results.
Yeah, except we're not talking about Germany are we. On an english based forum. You're not proving your point by this post.
Why don't you just try your favorite search engine. I'd suggest using the search phrase "extended 1st amendment protections." You'll learn something interesting...providing of course the search engine you picked isn't curating your results.
Against Nazis and white supremacists. Uh oh, slashdot didn't delete my comment, it must be biased too!
Are you biased against black supremacists? How about democrats that demand that laws shouldn't be enforced?
I mean, what are the chances that Nazis and KKK members are hated by most of society, and that it becomes reflected in a platform used by large portions of society?
Well that's a funny thing, because there's more black supremacists and communist agitators like BAMN, antifa and so on then actual nazi's or members of the KKK these days. Out of curiosity, are you against them as well? Twitter isn't.
Funny, I didn't hear you complaining about leftwing terrorism. You know like the democrat who shot up the congressional baseball game. Or the other democrat who sent ricin through the mail and tried to kill a bunch of people including Trump's kid. Oh yes, very "right wing terrorism." And sure didn't hear you whining about Holder saying "kick them when they're down." Or Waters telling people to get into the face of other people - funny how progressives and democrats suddenly started doing this right after she said it.
No no, it's ALLLLLLLLLLlllll right wing terrorism.
Doesn't actually matter if they're not a government entity. Twitter has testified that they consider themselves the "new public square" for political discussion. They promoted that as well. There's been a whole assload of cases on this whereby a company presents itself as a public square, 1st amendment rules apply.
So really it boils down to this: Either the 1st amendment rules apply, in which case they're far more broadly protected and so are people. Or it doesn't, in which case they're not only curating content, but the people allowed to post there. In which case CDA S.230 no longer apply and they become liable for anything posted there. The "reasonable" defense section only applies if they allow access but don't actively curate, something they stopped doing a few years ago, when they made the change of how people become verified and in turn stated that they support the views of the people who are verified. This again is something they've openly stated.
after the last account removals of Nazis
You mean the last account removals of people using the NPC meme, where twitter has refused to give any ban reason at all? But liberals and progressives were screeching that the NPC meme is 'dehumanizing' but conveniently forget that they've been labeling anyone who doesn't follow their ideology as nasi's, fascists, racists, sexists, homophobes, and chalk full of misogyny? And if you're a minority that doesn't agree, you're an uncle tom, house ni**er(enjoy the lameness filter), race traitor, white supremacist, and so on? And that's been going on for years at this point.
How very interesting is that rational. Yep, looks like liberals and progressives have diminished actual words of "bad people" to the point where nobody really gives a shit, except for the people that think just like them. *Insert joke here about NPC's following the same program.*
Holy crap.
There were not communists everywhere. Most of the people accused of being communists and "un-American" were not. Innocent people lost everything because of the witch hunt.
Good example of someone who didn't read the Venona Papers or the declassified KGB archives. Your entire reasoning is like the person who says "Well the STASI didn't really do bad things..." except when the recovered files that weren't destroyed, showed that they "did very bad things," including murdering children to keep their parents in line.
You say SJWs are hunting and destroying their enemies, yet you think the guy who famously did just that on the flimsiest of evidence, often mere rumour or aggressive and unfair questioning, was right. McCarthy, the poster boy for paranoid delusions of conspiracies.
You were the one who brought up McCarthy, not me. I simply pointed out that he was right. Not only do the documents prove he was right, but in fact he had understated the problem of the infiltration by actual USSR agents.
Yep, sure. The loudest complainers are usually those who never have seen an actual SJW in their whole life. It is like with the actual neonazis screaming foreigners GTFO - they are the loudest in the areas where there are barely any foreigners in the first place.
Then I'm sure you can provide evidence of that can't you. I have a feeling I'll be in for a very long wait.
It's not "witch hunt culture", it's that politics is now post-truth.
It's not? So why in the UK are progressives doxing pro-brexit individuals? Why are progressives trying to dox and harass chinese immigrants in Canada, who became legal citizens for protesting against illegal immigration. Why are progressives in the US stating that "speech is violence" and then using word salad going after peoples jobs. Why did progressives try to dox and harass Lindsay Shepard for wanting to have an open immigration debate by having all sides including extremist views presented. What parts of those are post-truth? Inconvenient facts? That people are taking stances on issues and being harassed for it?
Very much not a "witch hunt culture" among the left.
And what does that have to do with the Linux Code of Conduct? What part of it is like a "1953 playbook of fuck insert race here"?
Read the comment chain slowly, then read it again.
The real problem is snowflakes who are triggered by the mere suggestion that they shouldn't be assholes all the time (part time is fine), and then assume that it's a giant conspiracy against their race and soon they will be the ones at the back of the bus.
Proving again that the left can't meme, if you don't want to look like an idiot don't use a meme you don't understand. You want to know what a snowflake is? Someone who can't handle rape law in a legal class, and demands that it be banned because they're offended.
Reminds me of McCarthyism - whatever was really there was dwarfed by the paranoia, the fear that SJWs are everywhere and anyone could be one.
Except McCarthy was right. It's not that the paranoia of SJW's are everywhere. They declare themselves loudly that they're such, that they're "fighting for social justice". It's the fact that they're having a negative impact on society and people have had enough. This isn't paranoia, when the self-proclaimed actors proudly cheer their actions and fucking people over. So, tell me. Which group is telling people that if you don't want illegals in your country you're: "Racist, sexist, homophobic, misandrist, xenophobes."
You can look at any business in the west and see how SJW's and their various allies have reduced the chances of female employment(you can thank metoo) for that one. You can see the destruction of historical monuments pushed by them. You can see their attempts to reduce free speech. You can see how they align themselves in support of violent actions against people who don't agree with their ideology. You can see them protesting VoterID laws, lawful immigration, cheering the banning of books.
Hey, you want to believe that they're nobodies by all means. But it's far harder to believe when they're in charge of the education system and telling teachers not to teach "How to kill a mockingbird" because racism.
They behave very much the same, but scream louder. Apparently, in their quest to be left alone they can't leave others alone.
So people who are having their speech, jobs, livelihoods, education chances, employment impacted by SJW's who are actually causing these problems in the first place.
Typical broken thinking, it's the person at the end of the chain that's impacted who's at fault. Not the person who's causing it.