You're comparing Europe to North America again. Around nearly every "surplus" store here, parking is free. If it's not, it's usually $1-2/2-5hr parking because they also own the lot. On top of that, surplus stores have shifted and cater to larger groups of people. One of the ones nearly me is called "London City Surplus" you can find pretty much everything there, from used military goods to stuff that's been dumped by 3M and EDM(Electro-Motive Diesel) which builds 'slugs' and train engines. Both with the ability to be 'hot dropped' into areas for electrical power without requiring an inverter. On of the other surplus stores in Kitchener/Waterloo has more stuff from Blackberry for instance, and used stuff from the tri-univerisities(Waterloo, Wilfred-laurier, Conestoga) in the area.
The problem in this case is that the above mentioned store is being pushed out. And that 'hobbyists' aren't going in as they used to, this likely has more to do with people who work for SV companies no longer being able to afford to live there and commuting in.
Is not private land. In fact it is specially designated land for that purpose and most of the examples of Speakers Corners are actually on Crown land.
This is the part where you don't understand how it came to be.
Which is a load of crap and just because a bunch of people regularly gather on my front lawn or a shopping centre lobby, or a private park etc doesn't automatically make it public.
All of those places mentioned are defined as "semi-public" in law. And even at that, private property can fall under the protections and be required to hold and grant the same rights to individuals as those would be under lands held by government.
Again that "access" based system is a US irregularity and elsewhere if private land is to be protected by free speech it actively has to be designated as such, as is the case with the examples you gave.
And yet, I can find plenty of case law from other countries that state otherwise. Maybe you should try the same?
It's not "counter-culture" to espouse the prejudices of the dominant culture. That's not how it works.
The 'left' have held control of education and entertainment for the better part of 35 years, and in north america have held news media for the better part of 25 years. They are the mainstream culture. The fact that this eludes you is rather telling, along with your belief that "the right" is the dominant culture. If it was, you wouldn't see all of this progressive garbage being pushed and supported by all those same groups now would you.
You realize that in most countries, and even US states that MH coverage at that point is covered by medicade/medicare. No I guess you didn't. I guess that shows just how ignorant you really are. So far you haven't proposed any "real policies" either, you've only turned around and come out stating that you're in favor of revoking a guaranteed right. Nice little fascist, good little fascist. What freedom are you going after next?
Well... Yeah, I mean, I don't really regard people who throw such accusations around as "my side". I can't be held accountable for their actions and it's frankly quite annoying when people assume I'm some kind of "SJW" or "leftist" or whatever.
Mashiki does this all the time, listing endless things he thinks I believe but which anyone who had actually read my posts seriously would know are absurd. That's why I've given up with him, it's just impossible to have any kind of conversation at all with the guy.
Yes, because in the reasonable world when you involve yourself in politics. You work to help "moderate" and "deal with" the extremist elements of the people who's views you espouse. Something you have no interest in doing, round that out that in many cases you're supportive of a variety of those view points like censorship. And have come out saying that "you want to bring those same ideas" those same failed ideas to the country that you're wanting to flee to. No, no...the real problem is that you're incapable of seeing that your grand socialist experiment has already been done in the country you're living in and it's failed. The censorship you want has already been done, and you want to get out. You're just like the ardent communist supporter who screeches that "real communism has never been tried."
Yes, I'm the problem. Not the intellectual coward who will drag me into a conversation, but is too afraid to reply.
You mean their 'video game' show that screeched that all gamers were chalk full of misogyny, and gamers have a violence and sexism problem? Gee I wonder why that didn't last.
You're referring to Nasim Najafi Aghdam, who was the shooter at the YouTube campus who killed herself. Below is the list of people we were discussing. You will notice her name is not on the list.
Strange, it appears you weren't discussing anything. Rather you were whinging and unable to explain why you had problems with various people who are mainly self-described leftists. Until the left decided to attack them directly and "the left, left them."
Hard core pornography? You mean the same stuff you can find all over twitter. Or is it because he posted gay pornography at alt-right figures who were attacking him, and their response was mass-flagging his account?
But somehow, people like arthur chu and kristi winters are still on twitter despite their numerous ToS violations that twitter doesn't seem to care about.
A civil war begun and he started mass killings of his own people, which made the civil war all the more heated. US didn't start the civil war.
A civil war didn't begin, and he didn't start mass killings of his own. Islamic extremists started a war, which became a civil war along sectarian lines.
Private property turning into public space is a US irregularity and had nothing to do with "most of the west"
Nearly every western country has something similar. Whether it be speakers corner in the UK, where speakers are protected under "parliamentary privilege" aka even if they're spewing complete fabrications they're protected. To Canada where similar places exist. To the same in Asian countries like Japan and Singapore where similar rights are guaranteed again under protected privilege.
You're quite right, it's not homogeneous. But those very loud voices with those points you made are the views that are being pushed in colleges, universities, and in the media. To the point where non-radfems, are attacked in the media for being "the wrong kind of feminist."
That's a bunch of bunk. Obama did NOT start the civil wars, and they raged on with and without dictator removal. Keeping (Syria) versus removing original dictator (Libya) made no difference: both countries went to shit. If the Middle East civil wars had any single cause, it was the harsh economic crash that began under W's watch.
Gadaffi: No threat to the US, openly welcomed inspectors, had a GDP surplus, was honoring stipulations on trade agreements. Was reforming country into quasi-secular areas with internal government bodies. Post-Hillary and Obama economic collapse, ruin, destruction, and slave markets. The only reason ISIS hasn't managed to get a foothold was because under Gadaffi individual areas were managed like states and had their own internal controls and worked together. Syria on the other hand is far, far, far more interesting. Because the only reason that the US got involved in there was at the behest of "allies" who are now blockaded by Saudi Arabia, that wanted to build a NG pipeline. You know what the difference between Libya and Syria is right now? Syria is more stable.
America has no Puritanism left because America has no left. Bernie Sanders is on the moderate right and he's as left as America gets.
If you think Bernie Sanders is on the moderate right, then you're so far left that Stalin might be right-wing. Nearly all of his views are to the left of the NDP and Greens in Canada. And we call the NDP "communist lite" for their views.
Trump is in the Whitehouse, women are protesting in the streets, the government is explicitly anti-feminist...
And yet nobody, not even them can explain what they're protesting. They had no problems ignoring the Clintons for decades doing worse then Trump's locker room talk, or ignoring and/or covering up payouts for sexual harassment in government. The government being anti-feminist is a good thing, if you don't think so then you haven't figured out just how fast a persons life is destroyed by a false accusation. Remember feminism promotes "listen and believe." And also promotes no-punishment for false accusations.
Conservatives are trying to make you register to see porn, regulate people's bathroom usage...
Can't find anything on that in the republican platform. Can't find that in any mainstream conservative sites. But we can find plenty of mainstream feminism sites that state "porn is abuse of women" "women who enjoy doing porn have internalized misogyny" "viewing porn is misogyny" "porn is rape culture" promoting garbage like 1:5 women will be sexually assaulted on campus(FYI that would mean a college campus is more dangerous for women then Mogadishu) or other such drek without a problem. Promotion of "mandatory anti-rape" classes, because we all know that men just can't control themselves when they see that whores uncovered hair, and her showing ankle. Oh wait, that one might be just a bit true...but only for specific groups of people. Pushing a politically correct culture that defends anti-western ideals, and defends absolute barbarism to the point where feminists blame underage girls for being raped - not the rapist(s).
And somehow it's still feminism's fault.
Considering modern feminism dumped equality, decided to go full authoritarian. Screeches that a "penis in vagina" is rape. Has a very serious man-hatred problem. Fights against domestic abuse shelters for men. That prominent voices state that rape can only be done by men. Promoting anti-equality under law legislation - meaning guilt before innocence no matter the case. Promoting anti-exculpatory evidence laws. Promoting no jail sentences for violent female offenders.
Yeah, I'd say feminism has some good blame to soak.
Keep in mind that the Christian right really hasn't been a voting force for a while. On the other hand, the puritan left has become a voting force. You've got sex-negative feminism as you pointed out, but there's also a general sex-negative leftism as well. Just look at all the neo-puritains that rail against video games and movies that have sexual content from the left.
What I find annoying as hell is how the old-hacks who railed against movies and video games, now feel emboldened by the very loud minority voices among the left pushing for censorship to the point that they can dust off their old talking points and start anew. And the same media outlets, those same voices who screeched that those right-wingers were assholes for trying to censor, are right there...nodding their heads in agreement. Here's two good examples, Jack Thompson is now paraded by leftist sites as a moral voice. And a nearly dead right-wing organization got Cosmopolitan removed from walmart by riding on the heels of left wing screeching.
Ok. That's not fair. Trump definitely isn't a terrorist.
That requires planning skiils.
Well that's quite true. The Obama presidency proved that you don't need planning skills to be a terrorist. He did a pretty good job of killing leaders of other nations with no clue on what to do after, or destabilize an entire area of the world to the point that millions try fleeing to Europe and cause mass destabilization of a second area of the world.
No, that's the default front page when you open the site from a clean browser. After I log in, it shows something more relevant to me however the clickbait appears from to time, e.g. I watch movie reviews and that opens up "10 ten bullshit facts about some movie" style vids.
Really? Doesn't look like that from my end. All I see is: trending(mostly entertainment), TV shows, reality TV, comedy and music trailers in the first 5 rows. Maybe you're seeing low quality content because of the country you're living in?
I have not tried it. But I suspect it is way easier to get a gun illegally in the US than it is in europe, if only for the fact that there are so many people from which one could be stolen.
Nope, it's trivial in just about every country to get an illegal gun because there's so many unstable countries right next door. That includes things like grenades, and fully-automatic weapons. In Canada, illegal guns are more likely to come from China then from the US. Why? Because the most common route when people try to smuggle weapons in is via either Windsor/Detroit or Port Huron. And border agents on both sides are generally pretty good at catching that in transit, and it helps that nearly all trucks either have pre-inspection and sealed or have a secondary inspection during the crossing. On the other hand, there's so much cargo entering/leaving out of Vancouver that only a fraction is ever inspected even if it has suspect labeling.
In the US? Getting your hands on an actual illegal gun(i.e. machine gun) is nearly impossible. Getting your hands on a stolen gun though? It's more difficult then 20 years to get one, but not impossible.
I encourage readers to google those names and discover for themselves how much of cultural importance has been lost by those people not being able to make money on YouTube.
Considering that as little as 2 years ago, many of them were leftists, or self-proclaimed leftists. It's very special individuals like yourself(among others), who've driven the left so far to the left that you're unable to see it from your echo chamber. It'd be hilarious if it wasn't so sad that you repeatedly prove their point, by turning around and then attacking them.
You mean the time when the abusive, exploitative, and ineffectual facilities were exposed for their incompetence and malignancy, and when revealed in court, the right-wing partisans decided the easiest fix was to throw them out and pretend they were forced to do it because really, that's the only way to treat mental illness.
Which is why it happened under left-wing governments, and those 'right-wing partisans' had to follow through because the courts made it so with no actual recourse to amend the law, or rewrite the law because the rulings were repeatedly overly-broad.
This is what conservatives still think, afterall:
I can't figure out how you've got through life thinking like that, especially after that really good bit of hypocrisy.
That's the ethos responsible for it. But you can't take responsibility, so you have to blame your enemies when it fails. Always and forever.
You should really go read the court cases, and the causal effects.
The amusing thing is that you're on record mocking other people who got laid off by corporate downsizing and relocations to foreign sites. Funny, isn't it how you change your tune when your perceived enemies are involved?
Funny how you come across as a bit of a stalker isn't it? Yep, you really do need someone to pity your life.
I'm not sure why pornhub hasn't turned around and made their own yet. They not only have the capacity, but the knowledge to do so. But as it goes right now, it looks like bitchute is going to be the challenger at least in the short term.
You offered things that you claimed were excised from YouTube.
Not what I said, you also apparently don't understand how "toxic" is defined these days.
When rebutted that they are visible on YouTube, you move the goalposts and rail about a few worthless individuals instead.
"move the goal posts" says the person who's reading comprehension is a bit on the low side. "Worthless" people with 250k-6m+ subs
This is why we know you are a fraud. You can't back your own claims. You can't even stick to them, but keep changing the terms.
Takes less then 40 seconds to find their own, or other videos on it, or via other social media platforms.
Why don't you just start being honest?
You could start by getting your GED first, then we can follow up. Or you could always not post anonymously since your last couple of sentences kinda give away who you actually are. There, there, have some of my pity. You obviously need it.
it is not a public space... it is private property... you do not have the right of free speech.
This is the part where you've got it wrong. In most of the west, if a place "becomes a regular meeting area" for the public, or an active venue of communication then regardless of whether or not it's private property free speech laws apply. In the US, there's multiple court cases on this already.
YouTube has no obligation to be open to anyone saying anything.
Except that it holds dominant marketshare, uses it's platform to crush competition right? Maybe anti-trust laws would be a better answer to this.
Slashdot Mirror
You're comparing Europe to North America again. Around nearly every "surplus" store here, parking is free. If it's not, it's usually $1-2/2-5hr parking because they also own the lot. On top of that, surplus stores have shifted and cater to larger groups of people. One of the ones nearly me is called "London City Surplus" you can find pretty much everything there, from used military goods to stuff that's been dumped by 3M and EDM(Electro-Motive Diesel) which builds 'slugs' and train engines. Both with the ability to be 'hot dropped' into areas for electrical power without requiring an inverter. On of the other surplus stores in Kitchener/Waterloo has more stuff from Blackberry for instance, and used stuff from the tri-univerisities(Waterloo, Wilfred-laurier, Conestoga) in the area.
The problem in this case is that the above mentioned store is being pushed out. And that 'hobbyists' aren't going in as they used to, this likely has more to do with people who work for SV companies no longer being able to afford to live there and commuting in.
Almost makes you wish for the days of 1200 baud again doesn't it?
They most definitely do not.
They most definitely do.
Is not private land. In fact it is specially designated land for that purpose and most of the examples of Speakers Corners are actually on Crown land.
This is the part where you don't understand how it came to be.
Which is a load of crap and just because a bunch of people regularly gather on my front lawn or a shopping centre lobby, or a private park etc doesn't automatically make it public.
All of those places mentioned are defined as "semi-public" in law. And even at that, private property can fall under the protections and be required to hold and grant the same rights to individuals as those would be under lands held by government.
Again that "access" based system is a US irregularity and elsewhere if private land is to be protected by free speech it actively has to be designated as such, as is the case with the examples you gave.
And yet, I can find plenty of case law from other countries that state otherwise. Maybe you should try the same?
It's not "counter-culture" to espouse the prejudices of the dominant culture. That's not how it works.
The 'left' have held control of education and entertainment for the better part of 35 years, and in north america have held news media for the better part of 25 years. They are the mainstream culture. The fact that this eludes you is rather telling, along with your belief that "the right" is the dominant culture. If it was, you wouldn't see all of this progressive garbage being pushed and supported by all those same groups now would you.
You realize that in most countries, and even US states that MH coverage at that point is covered by medicade/medicare. No I guess you didn't. I guess that shows just how ignorant you really are. So far you haven't proposed any "real policies" either, you've only turned around and come out stating that you're in favor of revoking a guaranteed right. Nice little fascist, good little fascist. What freedom are you going after next?
When was this left wing government?
Take your pick. Unless you're the typical self-centered person that thinks it only happened in one country.
Well... Yeah, I mean, I don't really regard people who throw such accusations around as "my side". I can't be held accountable for their actions and it's frankly quite annoying when people assume I'm some kind of "SJW" or "leftist" or whatever.
Mashiki does this all the time, listing endless things he thinks I believe but which anyone who had actually read my posts seriously would know are absurd. That's why I've given up with him, it's just impossible to have any kind of conversation at all with the guy.
Yes, because in the reasonable world when you involve yourself in politics. You work to help "moderate" and "deal with" the extremist elements of the people who's views you espouse. Something you have no interest in doing, round that out that in many cases you're supportive of a variety of those view points like censorship. And have come out saying that "you want to bring those same ideas" those same failed ideas to the country that you're wanting to flee to. No, no...the real problem is that you're incapable of seeing that your grand socialist experiment has already been done in the country you're living in and it's failed. The censorship you want has already been done, and you want to get out. You're just like the ardent communist supporter who screeches that "real communism has never been tried."
Yes, I'm the problem. Not the intellectual coward who will drag me into a conversation, but is too afraid to reply.
You mean their 'video game' show that screeched that all gamers were chalk full of misogyny, and gamers have a violence and sexism problem? Gee I wonder why that didn't last.
You're referring to Nasim Najafi Aghdam, who was the shooter at the YouTube campus who killed herself. Below is the list of people we were discussing. You will notice her name is not on the list.
Strange, it appears you weren't discussing anything. Rather you were whinging and unable to explain why you had problems with various people who are mainly self-described leftists. Until the left decided to attack them directly and "the left, left them."
Hard core pornography? You mean the same stuff you can find all over twitter. Or is it because he posted gay pornography at alt-right figures who were attacking him, and their response was mass-flagging his account?
But somehow, people like arthur chu and kristi winters are still on twitter despite their numerous ToS violations that twitter doesn't seem to care about.
A civil war begun and he started mass killings of his own people, which made the civil war all the more heated. US didn't start the civil war.
A civil war didn't begin, and he didn't start mass killings of his own. Islamic extremists started a war, which became a civil war along sectarian lines.
You are comparing shit to puke.
Your actual ignorance of the world is astounding.
Private property turning into public space is a US irregularity and had nothing to do with "most of the west"
Nearly every western country has something similar. Whether it be speakers corner in the UK, where speakers are protected under "parliamentary privilege" aka even if they're spewing complete fabrications they're protected. To Canada where similar places exist. To the same in Asian countries like Japan and Singapore where similar rights are guaranteed again under protected privilege.
You're quite right, it's not homogeneous. But those very loud voices with those points you made are the views that are being pushed in colleges, universities, and in the media. To the point where non-radfems, are attacked in the media for being "the wrong kind of feminist."
That's a bunch of bunk. Obama did NOT start the civil wars, and they raged on with and without dictator removal. Keeping (Syria) versus removing original dictator (Libya) made no difference: both countries went to shit. If the Middle East civil wars had any single cause, it was the harsh economic crash that began under W's watch.
Gadaffi: No threat to the US, openly welcomed inspectors, had a GDP surplus, was honoring stipulations on trade agreements. Was reforming country into quasi-secular areas with internal government bodies. Post-Hillary and Obama economic collapse, ruin, destruction, and slave markets. The only reason ISIS hasn't managed to get a foothold was because under Gadaffi individual areas were managed like states and had their own internal controls and worked together. Syria on the other hand is far, far, far more interesting. Because the only reason that the US got involved in there was at the behest of "allies" who are now blockaded by Saudi Arabia, that wanted to build a NG pipeline. You know what the difference between Libya and Syria is right now? Syria is more stable.
America has no Puritanism left because America has no left. Bernie Sanders is on the moderate right and he's as left as America gets.
If you think Bernie Sanders is on the moderate right, then you're so far left that Stalin might be right-wing. Nearly all of his views are to the left of the NDP and Greens in Canada. And we call the NDP "communist lite" for their views.
Trump is in the Whitehouse, women are protesting in the streets, the government is explicitly anti-feminist...
And yet nobody, not even them can explain what they're protesting. They had no problems ignoring the Clintons for decades doing worse then Trump's locker room talk, or ignoring and/or covering up payouts for sexual harassment in government. The government being anti-feminist is a good thing, if you don't think so then you haven't figured out just how fast a persons life is destroyed by a false accusation. Remember feminism promotes "listen and believe." And also promotes no-punishment for false accusations.
Conservatives are trying to make you register to see porn, regulate people's bathroom usage...
Can't find anything on that in the republican platform. Can't find that in any mainstream conservative sites. But we can find plenty of mainstream feminism sites that state "porn is abuse of women" "women who enjoy doing porn have internalized misogyny" "viewing porn is misogyny" "porn is rape culture" promoting garbage like 1:5 women will be sexually assaulted on campus(FYI that would mean a college campus is more dangerous for women then Mogadishu) or other such drek without a problem. Promotion of "mandatory anti-rape" classes, because we all know that men just can't control themselves when they see that whores uncovered hair, and her showing ankle. Oh wait, that one might be just a bit true...but only for specific groups of people. Pushing a politically correct culture that defends anti-western ideals, and defends absolute barbarism to the point where feminists blame underage girls for being raped - not the rapist(s).
And somehow it's still feminism's fault.
Considering modern feminism dumped equality, decided to go full authoritarian. Screeches that a "penis in vagina" is rape. Has a very serious man-hatred problem. Fights against domestic abuse shelters for men. That prominent voices state that rape can only be done by men. Promoting anti-equality under law legislation - meaning guilt before innocence no matter the case. Promoting anti-exculpatory evidence laws. Promoting no jail sentences for violent female offenders.
Yeah, I'd say feminism has some good blame to soak.
Keep in mind that the Christian right really hasn't been a voting force for a while. On the other hand, the puritan left has become a voting force. You've got sex-negative feminism as you pointed out, but there's also a general sex-negative leftism as well. Just look at all the neo-puritains that rail against video games and movies that have sexual content from the left.
What I find annoying as hell is how the old-hacks who railed against movies and video games, now feel emboldened by the very loud minority voices among the left pushing for censorship to the point that they can dust off their old talking points and start anew. And the same media outlets, those same voices who screeched that those right-wingers were assholes for trying to censor, are right there...nodding their heads in agreement. Here's two good examples, Jack Thompson is now paraded by leftist sites as a moral voice. And a nearly dead right-wing organization got Cosmopolitan removed from walmart by riding on the heels of left wing screeching.
Ok. That's not fair. Trump definitely isn't a terrorist.
That requires planning skiils.
Well that's quite true. The Obama presidency proved that you don't need planning skills to be a terrorist. He did a pretty good job of killing leaders of other nations with no clue on what to do after, or destabilize an entire area of the world to the point that millions try fleeing to Europe and cause mass destabilization of a second area of the world.
No, that's the default front page when you open the site from a clean browser. After I log in, it shows something more relevant to me however the clickbait appears from to time, e.g. I watch movie reviews and that opens up "10 ten bullshit facts about some movie" style vids.
Really? Doesn't look like that from my end. All I see is: trending(mostly entertainment), TV shows, reality TV, comedy and music trailers in the first 5 rows. Maybe you're seeing low quality content because of the country you're living in?
I have not tried it. But I suspect it is way easier to get a gun illegally in the US than it is in europe, if only for the fact that there are so many people from which one could be stolen.
Nope, it's trivial in just about every country to get an illegal gun because there's so many unstable countries right next door. That includes things like grenades, and fully-automatic weapons. In Canada, illegal guns are more likely to come from China then from the US. Why? Because the most common route when people try to smuggle weapons in is via either Windsor/Detroit or Port Huron. And border agents on both sides are generally pretty good at catching that in transit, and it helps that nearly all trucks either have pre-inspection and sealed or have a secondary inspection during the crossing. On the other hand, there's so much cargo entering/leaving out of Vancouver that only a fraction is ever inspected even if it has suspect labeling.
In the US? Getting your hands on an actual illegal gun(i.e. machine gun) is nearly impossible. Getting your hands on a stolen gun though? It's more difficult then 20 years to get one, but not impossible.
I encourage readers to google those names and discover for themselves how much of cultural importance has been lost by those people not being able to make money on YouTube.
Considering that as little as 2 years ago, many of them were leftists, or self-proclaimed leftists. It's very special individuals like yourself(among others), who've driven the left so far to the left that you're unable to see it from your echo chamber. It'd be hilarious if it wasn't so sad that you repeatedly prove their point, by turning around and then attacking them.
You mean the time when the abusive, exploitative, and ineffectual facilities were exposed for their incompetence and malignancy, and when revealed in court, the right-wing partisans decided the easiest fix was to throw them out and pretend they were forced to do it because really, that's the only way to treat mental illness.
Which is why it happened under left-wing governments, and those 'right-wing partisans' had to follow through because the courts made it so with no actual recourse to amend the law, or rewrite the law because the rulings were repeatedly overly-broad.
This is what conservatives still think, afterall:
I can't figure out how you've got through life thinking like that, especially after that really good bit of hypocrisy.
That's the ethos responsible for it. But you can't take responsibility, so you have to blame your enemies when it fails. Always and forever.
You should really go read the court cases, and the causal effects.
The amusing thing is that you're on record mocking other people who got laid off by corporate downsizing and relocations to foreign sites. Funny, isn't it how you change your tune when your perceived enemies are involved?
Funny how you come across as a bit of a stalker isn't it? Yep, you really do need someone to pity your life.
I'm not sure why pornhub hasn't turned around and made their own yet. They not only have the capacity, but the knowledge to do so. But as it goes right now, it looks like bitchute is going to be the challenger at least in the short term.
You offered things that you claimed were excised from YouTube.
Not what I said, you also apparently don't understand how "toxic" is defined these days.
When rebutted that they are visible on YouTube, you move the goalposts and rail about a few worthless individuals instead.
"move the goal posts" says the person who's reading comprehension is a bit on the low side. "Worthless" people with 250k-6m+ subs
This is why we know you are a fraud. You can't back your own claims. You can't even stick to them, but keep changing the terms.
Takes less then 40 seconds to find their own, or other videos on it, or via other social media platforms.
Why don't you just start being honest?
You could start by getting your GED first, then we can follow up. Or you could always not post anonymously since your last couple of sentences kinda give away who you actually are. There, there, have some of my pity. You obviously need it.
it is not a public space ... it is private property... you do not have the right of free speech.
This is the part where you've got it wrong. In most of the west, if a place "becomes a regular meeting area" for the public, or an active venue of communication then regardless of whether or not it's private property free speech laws apply. In the US, there's multiple court cases on this already.
YouTube has no obligation to be open to anyone saying anything.
Except that it holds dominant marketshare, uses it's platform to crush competition right? Maybe anti-trust laws would be a better answer to this.