YouTube decided that her content was worthless . . . why should they continue to give her any more money for it? She could have taken her content to anyone who thought that it was worth any money.
That's not really what's happened though. Youtube decided to cave to old guard media and advertisers fled(remember the adpocolypse?). I'll bet 2 years ago she was making $10k/year or more, and then she was making $0.10/mo with 50k+ views. Big shock that someone who loses a major source of income suddenly starts going off the deep end.
Calling the cops is no answer . . . they are not able to legally do anything, and are not trained mental health professionals.
Not true. Legally they can detain you and remand to the hospital if you're a threat to yourself or others. Police and EMS are the frontline in mental health care all across the western world after the gutting of them back in the 1980's and 1990's. You know, the part where activists pushed hard to get MH facilities shut down, and the courts followed suit? Remember that? At least here in Canada, 40k people who were in long-term mental health facilities were basically dumped right onto the streets. It wouldn't surprise me if it was 1m or more in the US.
Youtube is showing you that content because that's the content you've been watching, viewing, and repeatedly looking at. That's how the entire algorithm works. You know what I see when I look at youtube? Let's plays, game reviews, canadian politics, disassembling shitty chinese electronics that will light your head on fire if you look at it sideways.
All those things you say are toxic are visible on YouTube.
Except where they aren't right? Why not go look over the past year of people who've had their visibility revoked. Whether it's Chris Raygun, Pat Condell, MundaneMatt, Sargon of Akkad, Laci Green, Shoe0nhead, Undoomed, Top Hat's and Champagne, h3h3, Phil Defranco and on and on and on and on.
Content creators don't have anything to do with damaging youtube's brand. Youtube has done that all on their own, not only that but then they decided to fold on a smear campaign. Right now the following things are deemed "toxic" gun rights, free speech, anti-free speech, anti-gun rights, masculinity, femininity, pro-trans, anti-trans, pro-illegal alien, anti-illegal alien, discussing current politics, discussing historical politics, news, and well pretty much everything except content directed at 8 and under.
Youtube doesn't have a clue what their business is, the CEO has no idea what youtube is as by seen with her videos. Youtube didn't listen to content creators when they warned about actual extremism(isis videos), or content that sexualized children/appeared to be grooming children. Then they launched a "youtube hero's" which has been just as partisan as twitters "safety and trust council" those individuals simply go out of their way to restrict/strike content that they view as offensive or going against the progressive narrative. When creators then said well, if you don't want advertisers we'll find our own and they freaked the fuck out again, and went out of their way to restrict that. Then youtube after not listening to content creators and users, freaks the fuck out again when the old guard media starts attacking them - for the same shit that people had been warning them about for nearly 2 years and then starts using a wrecking ball approach.
To be honest, I'm surprised that it took this long for someone to snap. People who were in the 250k-500k sub range with 30-40% engagement were making $500-2500/mo a few years ago, and now make under $10/mo.
Well here's the problem for google. It runs afoul of privacy laws in pretty much every country outside of the US. It likely also falls afoul of various hacking laws in many of those same countries, regardless of whether or not you installed it. The privacy one is likely the part that will get the most traction though.
What are the dry-to-be countries in the area do, then?
War. Which is exactly what would happen if there isn't some form of offset such as China selling crops at a greatly reduced price to those areas and so on.
Some people might have forgotten but it was just a few years ago, that the learned people were saying that if you don't use social media you're likely a psychopath, or sociopath, etc. My, my...how times change.
Maybe you should try reading up on the social contract instead? Or you can believe that you're really smart, by showing how you're really not. Up to you.
Is he a billionaire? I'd like to see tax returns please.
You don't need to, look at the amount of property he owns. That's how 'net worth' is calculated after all. Earnings is something else, you should understand this basic fact.
So, how does someone so dumb become a billionaire anyway? If we went by your posts in this topic alone, you'd be halfway to that goal already.
You know what? Let's play a game of what-if. And let's say Trump manages to get N.Korea to back down, denuclearize, and a peace treaty all at one go. Which is what the N.Koreans are now pushing, and pushing for hard. Is he still dumb? Or is he smarter then the previous president(and want-to-be president), that destabilized the middle east, created a massive refugee crisis, managed to kill the EU and create a new slave trade in Libya.
IF (and that's a gigantic "IF") Slashdot implemented a proper system of EPR (Earned Public Reputation), then it should be possible to see at a glance what sort of person you're dealing with, at least clearly enough to decide if you want to spend any time reading what that person wrote. More to the point, I would want to use such a system to render invisible most of the people who are just likely to be wasting my time.
You'd fit in perfectly in China with their "perfect citizen" social media scoring. I'm not sure what's worse, that someone on/. thinks this is a viable answer to things. Or that they're likely american and think that this is a viable answer. Nice authoritarian streak.
Unfortunately the politicians (especially the Bolshevik Republicans) feel differently. Extremely differently. In accord with their bribes, they write the laws to permit the soulless and inhuman corporations to own OUR privacy. Minor and limited exceptions if you can afford enough lawyers.
That ah, should be democrats. They're the big money takers from Google, Facebook, Twitter, various "technology" groups that are pushing that allowance of corporations to own your privacy. Maybe you should spend a bit of time looking at who's donating to who? Spend a few hours reading opensecrets.org for example.
We have arrest records from the folks who tried reporting the "mass rapes" and the police arrested them for filing false reports.
So which is it? The media, independent inquiries aren't telling the truth. Or, that there's been what? 12? 15 different cities with the same thing happening over and over again, for decades at a time. And the police have arrested people for what later comes out to be true, which smells like a coverup. Now a coverup, we do know that happened as well don't we, the investigations by the crown state as much.
You're losing horribly, and you're too immature to accept it.
When facts make a person immature...yes...much losing as well.
Well that's all based on their ability to sell their point isn't it? Besides, we're talking about youtube not twitter. Remember that platform isn't limited to a short number of characters.
Sorry precious, for typing in a rush. Next time I'll do so, for your exacting standards. But it looks like you're another identitarian that is unable to see if something stands or sinks on it's own merits, and instead has to absolutely state that garbage because of people who are promoting it. How very progressive of you. Let me guess, the latest uncovering of a massive rape gang in the UK, which trafficked, sold, and used young girls as meat is fake because the only sites covering it are right-leaning. Just like all the other cases before it, and the police just for some reason can't quite figure out the link.
Mashiki, I've decided to stop responding to posts like this because they are all the same. You tell me what I think, but it's always wrong. You claim I want a police state, no matter how often I post opposing a police state. Then you accuse me of being a creep, and go off on some random and easily disproven conspiracy theories... And no matter what I post as a response, you ignore it anyway.
Sorry, I don't tell you what you think. I take what you say at face value. You simply don't like it when you're confronted with your own actions that cause a negative effect on society. You believe you're doing good, but your own actions, views, and beliefs are inherently self-destructive. You've openly said that UK laws restricting speech don't go far enough, and you want to go to another country that supports that or goes even further. You've said that blasphemy laws should exist. You've made comments supporting guilt before innocence in cases of sexual assault and rape, but only against men. Those are *all* authoritarian views.
Sadly, I didn't accuse you. I made an observation based on your strong "male feminist ally" posts, and the number of "male feminist allies" who've come out as creeps, abusers, and general nuts and simply wondered how long it would be, before the same happened to you. This triggered you to no end, so that makes me believe that you're not actually the "virtuous person" you claim to be, but the opposite. Rather like all those self-proclaimed virtuous individuals, you are simply a rather shitty person trying to pay back for either what you do now or have done in the past. This of course falls in line with your general regressive views. I enjoy your conspiracy theory part though, which one would that be? The one where I provided evidence of a persons own words like with gamergate? Where years on you still claim that it's "all about harassment" but refuse to look at all the people who claim they were harassed, and we find out that in truth it's projection all the way down. They've doxed, harassed, tried to get people fired from their jobs. Attempted to censor media because it triggers them, or they find skimpy clothes offensive. Or where I've disproved your claims? Go on.
I thought we might be able to have an interesting discussion, but I was wrong. You just rage against some imaginary person who isn't me, and then accuse me of lying when I don't conform to your alternative reality. You even give us links to where you get these delusions from, i.e. Reddit and Brietbart. It's like citing Bible verses as proof, it doesn't convince anyone except those who already believe.
You've just said that proof of something that's factual isn't proof? Even when you can read the actual links, actions, and arguments yourself. I also remember when you argued that facts from government websites were false, so that reasoning doesn't surprise me. So going by your reasoning, whatever is posted on/. isn't true because I say so. Brilliant. So also going with your reasoning, the antifa which just finished trashing downtown Hamilton, Ontario really don't exist? (Because it was first reported on reddit) See, unlike you I have no problem reading breitbart, the cbc, or even vox. And can figure out what's bullshit and what isn't. You on the other hand, so deep in that ideological bubble will refuse evidence of something even when it's true. Because if you're wrong about one thing, you could be wrong about others. And that throws a huge wrench into your entire belief system and ego.
I'm also kinda fed up with the sock puppet modding or whatever bullshit seems to surround your posts.
See this is a fine example of a conspiracy theory. You don't happen to realize that your views are regressive and people vote you down for it. While in my case, my views might not be popular but are generally correct. Speaking of which,/. editors by all means since you can see m
Looks like something a russian bot would say. Well I guess that confirms what everyone already suspected. PopeRatzo is really a russian bot in disguise.
Here's your complimentary armband and black boots. So which fundamental right shall you step on next and support 'kids' in? I'm guessing the 1st amendment.
There is a lot of money to be made from this kind of trolling, or simply producing low quality poorly researched videos. The textbook example is Carl Benjamin, aka Sargon of Akkad. He makes a small fortune off YouTube and Patreon, mostly producing videos of himself reacting to headlines and articles that he didn't read. Imagine Slashdot comments in video form.
Yes yes, we know. You hate people that are actual classical liberals because they clash with your progressive values. Those are same values you parrot, which have turned the UK into a police state. And those same values which "when you move" you want to start implementing in some place new and start the cycle of censorship and oppression all over again. What made sargon popular was his "this week in stupid" videos, the media itself publishes those stories. By all means, if he's wrong on other subjects, why don't you do your own video. If you're right, you'll end up famous. My guess? You'll end up like many of his critics, which end up being creepy stalkers who are bat shit insane and quibble over the definition of "is" like some Clintonite lawyer.
The only way to deal with it is human oversight. Any automated system will be gamed instantly, like the strikes system and DMCA take-downs are. Trolls tell their minions to false-flag videos they don't like.
Youtube already has this, and it's been abused repeatedly. If you dare to post anything that touches on the holy islam and people using it as justification for raping young girls? It's flagged and put into restricted mode. Speak out against Merkel? Flagged restricted mode. Speak about the mass rapes in the UK? Restricted. Speak out on the 120Db campaign in Germany? Restricted or copyright striked(even original content).
Of course humans make mistakes too, so they are like the least bad solution.
In today's environment they're not the least bad solution. They're among the worst, as evidenced by the number of partisan gatekeepers that will ban wrong think. You need some more examples? Why not go take a look at/r/worldnews or/r/politics and let us know. Oh right, you might not notice it. Because anything controversial has already been scrubbed and anything that goes against the narrative has already been deleted and the users banned. You might want to start with ceddit.com/r/worldnews first.
It's attempts to polarize and escalate the situation like this that are causing real problems. Some men seem to be afraid to even talk to women now, because of FUD like your comments. Your irresponsible rants are making men miserable and lonely.
It wasn't men who made this choice to polarize and attack men. It wasn't men who created #killallmen and then started believing that it was an acceptable thing. It wasn't men who turned around and started screeching that killing all but 20% of the male population is the only way to save the world. It wasn't men who turned around and were falsely accusing women of sexual assault or harassment, to the point where men now leave the door open or have a colleague with them in the same room. It wasn't men who turned around and created the policy that male and female police constables are required for the arrest of a women in order to offset any belief in sexual assault. It wasn't men who turned around and called themselves pedophiles for wanting to work with k-5 students. It wasn't men who pushed the "pedo danger" to the point where a father out with his daughter at the park will have the police called on him. It wasn't the father who killed himself at 24 because his wife ruined his life with a false accusation and he couldn't ever see his kid. It wasn't men who turned around and made the claim that only women are the best parent, and should be awarded custody of children. It wasn't men who laughed at Mike Pence for wanting to have his wife with him on a dinner meeting, but they sure were nodding their head.
It was all women, feminists at that. They've done a very good job of polarizing this already. That you're unwilling and unable to realize that feminism has caused these problems is down right hilarious.
Remember that time when you said I was probably a sexual predator disguised as a feminist? And also a misandrist and not a pure blooded Asian.
Remember that time when I said, I wonder when you'd be one of those virtue signalling people who screech loudly as a feminist and would likely be outed as a sexual predator. It's not like there isn't precedent there for it. The louder you yell that you're the "bestest male ally evar", the more likely you're trying to offset your actual terrible behavior. Your own comments make you a misandrist, as for 'pure blooded asian' well I guess that makes you alt-right or a nazi now, since you're putting so much faith on that.
Why is it that all the bad behaviour you complain about is stuff you yourself engage in?
I've got my very own stalker, and not only that but they're actually wrong. You could check the address make sure you got it right.
That's not what's happening in the case though. The washington post article is factually wrong, this wasn't caused by the clerk. This shouldn't be a surprise that he article is wrong either, since most reporters on legal matters haven't spent even 1 day in a law 101 class. If you did you'd also already know why this is happening. This was caused by new evidence being discovered by the defense and the FBI refusing to turn it over as required by law so the defendant can have a *complete defense*. The FBI is stonewalling go read the latest briefs, they're refusing to turn over evidence to the defense which is required by law. This isn't an isolated case, it has also happened in the Bundy case. You realize what happened in that one don't you? That was an in-force guilty plea at the time as well...
This isn't even touching on the modified 302s, and "lost" email and text messages. There's incomplete chains of evidence, there's lost chains of evidence, there's failure to disclose by law.
Haw many times do you think my parents replaced various parts in that 30 year old whatever?
Generally? Once. I'll give you an example, the fridge my parents have was made in 1973, it's now 2018. They've had to replace the thermostat in it once, that was back in 1994 or so. That's it.
You think the temperature sensor, timers, alternators, etc. in those things just last forever?
Generally? Those things do last forever. The average failure time on an alternator is around 12 years. Various engine sensors are built to last around 8-10 years. Doesn't mean there can be issues, for ones that have "rotational components" built into them like TPS and so on, or do duty in an extreme-heat environment like the O2 sensor(these are the most common failures) because hot/cold cycling can cause the ceramic casing to break and that ruins the sensor.
Technically they could be better, but they aren't. Companies are designing components to have a particular lifetime, and the rare cases where this isn't true is when it's devices that keep people safe. Even then, with the swath of chinese knockoffs, and chinesium metals there's supplyside failures because of it.
Slashdot Mirror
YouTube decided that her content was worthless . . . why should they continue to give her any more money for it? She could have taken her content to anyone who thought that it was worth any money.
That's not really what's happened though. Youtube decided to cave to old guard media and advertisers fled(remember the adpocolypse?). I'll bet 2 years ago she was making $10k/year or more, and then she was making $0.10/mo with 50k+ views. Big shock that someone who loses a major source of income suddenly starts going off the deep end.
Calling the cops is no answer . . . they are not able to legally do anything, and are not trained mental health professionals.
Not true. Legally they can detain you and remand to the hospital if you're a threat to yourself or others. Police and EMS are the frontline in mental health care all across the western world after the gutting of them back in the 1980's and 1990's. You know, the part where activists pushed hard to get MH facilities shut down, and the courts followed suit? Remember that? At least here in Canada, 40k people who were in long-term mental health facilities were basically dumped right onto the streets. It wouldn't surprise me if it was 1m or more in the US.
Youtube is showing you that content because that's the content you've been watching, viewing, and repeatedly looking at. That's how the entire algorithm works. You know what I see when I look at youtube? Let's plays, game reviews, canadian politics, disassembling shitty chinese electronics that will light your head on fire if you look at it sideways.
All those things you say are toxic are visible on YouTube.
Except where they aren't right? Why not go look over the past year of people who've had their visibility revoked. Whether it's Chris Raygun, Pat Condell, MundaneMatt, Sargon of Akkad, Laci Green, Shoe0nhead, Undoomed, Top Hat's and Champagne, h3h3, Phil Defranco and on and on and on and on.
Content creators don't have anything to do with damaging youtube's brand. Youtube has done that all on their own, not only that but then they decided to fold on a smear campaign. Right now the following things are deemed "toxic" gun rights, free speech, anti-free speech, anti-gun rights, masculinity, femininity, pro-trans, anti-trans, pro-illegal alien, anti-illegal alien, discussing current politics, discussing historical politics, news, and well pretty much everything except content directed at 8 and under.
Youtube doesn't have a clue what their business is, the CEO has no idea what youtube is as by seen with her videos. Youtube didn't listen to content creators when they warned about actual extremism(isis videos), or content that sexualized children/appeared to be grooming children. Then they launched a "youtube hero's" which has been just as partisan as twitters "safety and trust council" those individuals simply go out of their way to restrict/strike content that they view as offensive or going against the progressive narrative. When creators then said well, if you don't want advertisers we'll find our own and they freaked the fuck out again, and went out of their way to restrict that. Then youtube after not listening to content creators and users, freaks the fuck out again when the old guard media starts attacking them - for the same shit that people had been warning them about for nearly 2 years and then starts using a wrecking ball approach.
To be honest, I'm surprised that it took this long for someone to snap. People who were in the 250k-500k sub range with 30-40% engagement were making $500-2500/mo a few years ago, and now make under $10/mo.
Well here's the problem for google. It runs afoul of privacy laws in pretty much every country outside of the US. It likely also falls afoul of various hacking laws in many of those same countries, regardless of whether or not you installed it. The privacy one is likely the part that will get the most traction though.
What are the dry-to-be countries in the area do, then?
War. Which is exactly what would happen if there isn't some form of offset such as China selling crops at a greatly reduced price to those areas and so on.
Some people might have forgotten but it was just a few years ago, that the learned people were saying that if you don't use social media you're likely a psychopath, or sociopath, etc. My, my...how times change.
Maybe you should try reading up on the social contract instead? Or you can believe that you're really smart, by showing how you're really not. Up to you.
And you still couldn't answer my question could you? Got some nice whataboutism going on there.
Is he a billionaire? I'd like to see tax returns please.
You don't need to, look at the amount of property he owns. That's how 'net worth' is calculated after all. Earnings is something else, you should understand this basic fact.
Here, Mr. Trump, the dumbest candidate in history
So, how does someone so dumb become a billionaire anyway? If we went by your posts in this topic alone, you'd be halfway to that goal already.
You know what? Let's play a game of what-if. And let's say Trump manages to get N.Korea to back down, denuclearize, and a peace treaty all at one go. Which is what the N.Koreans are now pushing, and pushing for hard. Is he still dumb? Or is he smarter then the previous president(and want-to-be president), that destabilized the middle east, created a massive refugee crisis, managed to kill the EU and create a new slave trade in Libya.
IF (and that's a gigantic "IF") Slashdot implemented a proper system of EPR (Earned Public Reputation), then it should be possible to see at a glance what sort of person you're dealing with, at least clearly enough to decide if you want to spend any time reading what that person wrote. More to the point, I would want to use such a system to render invisible most of the people who are just likely to be wasting my time.
You'd fit in perfectly in China with their "perfect citizen" social media scoring. I'm not sure what's worse, that someone on /. thinks this is a viable answer to things. Or that they're likely american and think that this is a viable answer. Nice authoritarian streak.
Unfortunately the politicians (especially the Bolshevik Republicans) feel differently. Extremely differently. In accord with their bribes, they write the laws to permit the soulless and inhuman corporations to own OUR privacy. Minor and limited exceptions if you can afford enough lawyers.
That ah, should be democrats. They're the big money takers from Google, Facebook, Twitter, various "technology" groups that are pushing that allowance of corporations to own your privacy. Maybe you should spend a bit of time looking at who's donating to who? Spend a few hours reading opensecrets.org for example.
Dude you're retarded. Stop posting and embarrassing yourself. Sargon is trash, most of the world except the gullible idiots knows that.
Starts out with adhom, descends into something where they don't disprove anything...at all.
provably fake
https://www.rotherham.gov.uk/d...
We have arrest records from the folks who tried reporting the "mass rapes" and the police arrested them for filing false reports.
So which is it? The media, independent inquiries aren't telling the truth. Or, that there's been what? 12? 15 different cities with the same thing happening over and over again, for decades at a time. And the police have arrested people for what later comes out to be true, which smells like a coverup. Now a coverup, we do know that happened as well don't we, the investigations by the crown state as much.
You're losing horribly, and you're too immature to accept it.
When facts make a person immature...yes...much losing as well.
Well that's all based on their ability to sell their point isn't it? Besides, we're talking about youtube not twitter. Remember that platform isn't limited to a short number of characters.
Sorry precious, for typing in a rush. Next time I'll do so, for your exacting standards. But it looks like you're another identitarian that is unable to see if something stands or sinks on it's own merits, and instead has to absolutely state that garbage because of people who are promoting it. How very progressive of you. Let me guess, the latest uncovering of a massive rape gang in the UK, which trafficked, sold, and used young girls as meat is fake because the only sites covering it are right-leaning. Just like all the other cases before it, and the police just for some reason can't quite figure out the link.
Mashiki, I've decided to stop responding to posts like this because they are all the same. You tell me what I think, but it's always wrong. You claim I want a police state, no matter how often I post opposing a police state. Then you accuse me of being a creep, and go off on some random and easily disproven conspiracy theories... And no matter what I post as a response, you ignore it anyway.
Sorry, I don't tell you what you think. I take what you say at face value. You simply don't like it when you're confronted with your own actions that cause a negative effect on society. You believe you're doing good, but your own actions, views, and beliefs are inherently self-destructive. You've openly said that UK laws restricting speech don't go far enough, and you want to go to another country that supports that or goes even further. You've said that blasphemy laws should exist. You've made comments supporting guilt before innocence in cases of sexual assault and rape, but only against men. Those are *all* authoritarian views.
Sadly, I didn't accuse you. I made an observation based on your strong "male feminist ally" posts, and the number of "male feminist allies" who've come out as creeps, abusers, and general nuts and simply wondered how long it would be, before the same happened to you. This triggered you to no end, so that makes me believe that you're not actually the "virtuous person" you claim to be, but the opposite. Rather like all those self-proclaimed virtuous individuals, you are simply a rather shitty person trying to pay back for either what you do now or have done in the past. This of course falls in line with your general regressive views. I enjoy your conspiracy theory part though, which one would that be? The one where I provided evidence of a persons own words like with gamergate? Where years on you still claim that it's "all about harassment" but refuse to look at all the people who claim they were harassed, and we find out that in truth it's projection all the way down. They've doxed, harassed, tried to get people fired from their jobs. Attempted to censor media because it triggers them, or they find skimpy clothes offensive. Or where I've disproved your claims? Go on.
I thought we might be able to have an interesting discussion, but I was wrong. You just rage against some imaginary person who isn't me, and then accuse me of lying when I don't conform to your alternative reality. You even give us links to where you get these delusions from, i.e. Reddit and Brietbart. It's like citing Bible verses as proof, it doesn't convince anyone except those who already believe.
You've just said that proof of something that's factual isn't proof? Even when you can read the actual links, actions, and arguments yourself. I also remember when you argued that facts from government websites were false, so that reasoning doesn't surprise me. So going by your reasoning, whatever is posted on /. isn't true because I say so. Brilliant. So also going with your reasoning, the antifa which just finished trashing downtown Hamilton, Ontario really don't exist? (Because it was first reported on reddit) See, unlike you I have no problem reading breitbart, the cbc, or even vox. And can figure out what's bullshit and what isn't. You on the other hand, so deep in that ideological bubble will refuse evidence of something even when it's true. Because if you're wrong about one thing, you could be wrong about others. And that throws a huge wrench into your entire belief system and ego.
I'm also kinda fed up with the sock puppet modding or whatever bullshit seems to surround your posts.
See this is a fine example of a conspiracy theory. You don't happen to realize that your views are regressive and people vote you down for it. While in my case, my views might not be popular but are generally correct. Speaking of which, /. editors by all means since you can see m
Looks like something a russian bot would say. Well I guess that confirms what everyone already suspected. PopeRatzo is really a russian bot in disguise.
Here's your complimentary armband and black boots. So which fundamental right shall you step on next and support 'kids' in? I'm guessing the 1st amendment.
There is a lot of money to be made from this kind of trolling, or simply producing low quality poorly researched videos. The textbook example is Carl Benjamin, aka Sargon of Akkad. He makes a small fortune off YouTube and Patreon, mostly producing videos of himself reacting to headlines and articles that he didn't read. Imagine Slashdot comments in video form.
Yes yes, we know. You hate people that are actual classical liberals because they clash with your progressive values. Those are same values you parrot, which have turned the UK into a police state. And those same values which "when you move" you want to start implementing in some place new and start the cycle of censorship and oppression all over again. What made sargon popular was his "this week in stupid" videos, the media itself publishes those stories. By all means, if he's wrong on other subjects, why don't you do your own video. If you're right, you'll end up famous. My guess? You'll end up like many of his critics, which end up being creepy stalkers who are bat shit insane and quibble over the definition of "is" like some Clintonite lawyer.
The only way to deal with it is human oversight. Any automated system will be gamed instantly, like the strikes system and DMCA take-downs are. Trolls tell their minions to false-flag videos they don't like.
Youtube already has this, and it's been abused repeatedly. If you dare to post anything that touches on the holy islam and people using it as justification for raping young girls? It's flagged and put into restricted mode. Speak out against Merkel? Flagged restricted mode. Speak about the mass rapes in the UK? Restricted. Speak out on the 120Db campaign in Germany? Restricted or copyright striked(even original content).
Of course humans make mistakes too, so they are like the least bad solution.
In today's environment they're not the least bad solution. They're among the worst, as evidenced by the number of partisan gatekeepers that will ban wrong think. You need some more examples? Why not go take a look at /r/worldnews or /r/politics and let us know. Oh right, you might not notice it. Because anything controversial has already been scrubbed and anything that goes against the narrative has already been deleted and the users banned. You might want to start with ceddit.com/r/worldnews first.
It's attempts to polarize and escalate the situation like this that are causing real problems. Some men seem to be afraid to even talk to women now, because of FUD like your comments. Your irresponsible rants are making men miserable and lonely.
It wasn't men who made this choice to polarize and attack men. It wasn't men who created #killallmen and then started believing that it was an acceptable thing. It wasn't men who turned around and started screeching that killing all but 20% of the male population is the only way to save the world. It wasn't men who turned around and were falsely accusing women of sexual assault or harassment, to the point where men now leave the door open or have a colleague with them in the same room. It wasn't men who turned around and created the policy that male and female police constables are required for the arrest of a women in order to offset any belief in sexual assault. It wasn't men who turned around and called themselves pedophiles for wanting to work with k-5 students. It wasn't men who pushed the "pedo danger" to the point where a father out with his daughter at the park will have the police called on him. It wasn't the father who killed himself at 24 because his wife ruined his life with a false accusation and he couldn't ever see his kid. It wasn't men who turned around and made the claim that only women are the best parent, and should be awarded custody of children. It wasn't men who laughed at Mike Pence for wanting to have his wife with him on a dinner meeting, but they sure were nodding their head.
It was all women, feminists at that. They've done a very good job of polarizing this already. That you're unwilling and unable to realize that feminism has caused these problems is down right hilarious.
Remember that time when you said I was probably a sexual predator disguised as a feminist? And also a misandrist and not a pure blooded Asian.
Remember that time when I said, I wonder when you'd be one of those virtue signalling people who screech loudly as a feminist and would likely be outed as a sexual predator. It's not like there isn't precedent there for it. The louder you yell that you're the "bestest male ally evar", the more likely you're trying to offset your actual terrible behavior. Your own comments make you a misandrist, as for 'pure blooded asian' well I guess that makes you alt-right or a nazi now, since you're putting so much faith on that.
Why is it that all the bad behaviour you complain about is stuff you yourself engage in?
I've got my very own stalker, and not only that but they're actually wrong. You could check the address make sure you got it right.
That's not what's happening in the case though. The washington post article is factually wrong, this wasn't caused by the clerk. This shouldn't be a surprise that he article is wrong either, since most reporters on legal matters haven't spent even 1 day in a law 101 class. If you did you'd also already know why this is happening. This was caused by new evidence being discovered by the defense and the FBI refusing to turn it over as required by law so the defendant can have a *complete defense*. The FBI is stonewalling go read the latest briefs, they're refusing to turn over evidence to the defense which is required by law. This isn't an isolated case, it has also happened in the Bundy case. You realize what happened in that one don't you? That was an in-force guilty plea at the time as well...
This isn't even touching on the modified 302s, and "lost" email and text messages. There's incomplete chains of evidence, there's lost chains of evidence, there's failure to disclose by law.
Haw many times do you think my parents replaced various parts in that 30 year old whatever?
Generally? Once. I'll give you an example, the fridge my parents have was made in 1973, it's now 2018. They've had to replace the thermostat in it once, that was back in 1994 or so. That's it.
You think the temperature sensor, timers, alternators, etc. in those things just last forever?
Generally? Those things do last forever. The average failure time on an alternator is around 12 years. Various engine sensors are built to last around 8-10 years. Doesn't mean there can be issues, for ones that have "rotational components" built into them like TPS and so on, or do duty in an extreme-heat environment like the O2 sensor(these are the most common failures) because hot/cold cycling can cause the ceramic casing to break and that ruins the sensor.
Technically they could be better, but they aren't. Companies are designing components to have a particular lifetime, and the rare cases where this isn't true is when it's devices that keep people safe. Even then, with the swath of chinese knockoffs, and chinesium metals there's supplyside failures because of it.
Then why don't you explain to everybody why the judge has demanded exculpatory evidence be presented and the FBI is stonewalling.
You just decided what the analysts meant. Your argument seems to be one from incredulity. Ouch.
I took their words at exact value. They're the ones that said they guess, but had no evidence of it, not rocket surgery.