Vehicular manslaughter apologist, nice to meet you.
Injuries are inconsistent with that as reported in the media. There is no "strike damage to the lower torso" no broken bones, no fractures, no head injury. The air bags on the car weren't even deployed. Those are all facts you can find in the media, the mainstream press at that.
It's exactly what the article says. The guy who shot the cops in Colorado on Sunday was an alt-right jackoff who posted Pepe memes.
No it doesn't. The article makes the ASSUMPTION that's the case. Now read the rest of the article where it says:
Riehl seemed to have a grudge against local police officers, and posted multiple complaints about the Douglas County Sheriffâ(TM)s Department on YouTube.
Specifically, the AP notes that Riehl in a December video called for âoethe firing of Douglas County Sheriff Tony Spurlockâ and attacked him âoein highly personal terms.â Riehl also said that during that video that he would be running as a âoelibertarianâ candidate for Douglas County Sheriff.
Really, stop with the bullshit and shoehorning. All it does is show you're carrying an agenda that doesn't fit the real world.
In the past the word antisemitism used to refer to people who wanted to abuse and brutalize anyone who is of Jewish descent, not to people who have legitimate criticism against Jewish religion.
Then by all means check UoT, McGill and UofM, you'll hit that "wanted to abuse and brutalize anyone who is of Jewish descent." UofM was bad enough ~6 years ago that Israeli students were leaving the campus.
Did you even read the article I linked to? Only one university responded, and even at that they "only disagreed" because the faculty at that one university is knee deep in BDS.
We can truly recycle paper - make old paper into paper
Fuck no. It takes twice as much energy to recycle paper then it does to have sustainable forestry. Recycled paper has to go back through the entire cellulose-separation and dying/bleaching and re-drying phase. There's a lot of waste out of all of that. Use that old paper waste for anything else, heating, insulation, compost, mix with landfills to produce biogas whatever. There's a million better things to do with it.
Erm. Then what caused the blunt force injury to the chest?
Falling? Hitting a curb? Bollards? Crowd itself? There's a lot of things that can cause a blunt force injury to the chest. Also, you can have a blunt force injury to the chest from the heart attack itself as the muscles in the chest contract so hard they'll tear and cause traumatic bruising similar to a punch.
Hmm... well... You've got your organized antifa groups(again). You've got entrenched academia pushing identity politics and identiarianism. There is a nasty undercurrent of antisemitism. They'll claim that the reason that everything is failing is because of whites, sometimes asians. If you dare step off that line of thinking, you'll be harassed, attacked(socially and sometimes physically). If you dare to question what they're telling you, they will react in a violent manner. Yes...seems like the left have a real problem.
So yeah, those of us who actually have a clue, the sixty-some+ year-olds who've either lived or witnessed the horrors of war and genocide are going to do their damnest so that clueless free-speech-flag waiving little millenials like you never have to live through this hell.
And there comes the authoritarian line that attacks free speech. Because as we all know, hiding in the dark does wonders! A disenfranchised group of people who are already being marginalized by a particular group of people simply won't draw more people to them. Not at all.
Why the fuck did this get (+1)? Is "jew hating" the new blood libel?
Ask academia. There's plenty of jew hating and antisemitism coming from left-wing groups on university campuses. I mean this is from a university in my own province and it's coming directly out of the leftwing halls in those universities. And it's sure not limited to Canada, but EU universities and US universities. So much so that the difference between a far-right extremist and a far-left extremist simply boils down to who's got more power at the moment and how they can wield it. Right now? That's the left, and in many countries they've had institutional power in universities for over a generation.
Remember those 5 cops killed in Dallas(plus 12 injured) in 2017? Yeah, he bought into the anti-fascist/anti-cop rhetoric. So was the female cop sitting in the evidence van and had her brains smeared all over the inside. Oh did I mention she was also black and a single parent, and the person was also an anti-fascist/anti-cop nut. Then there were the two troopers in Georgia, another in Tennessee again the same garbage. And that's off the top of my head. Several more in Michigan, and on and on and on. Out of those, almost every case the person was an anti-cop and/or anti-fascist nut, who left behind long screeds justifying their murder of people.
Despite your list up at the top: Heather Heyer - not directly killed, hasn't been proven in court. Maybe indirectly. Was not struck by the vehicle, died of heart attack. Was massively overweight, and a chain smoker. Taliesin Namkai Meche - Not killed by a nazi, but by a supremacist of a different flavor. Ricky Best - Same as above, linked to same story as Meche. Also suspect has yet to have their day in court. Richard Collins III - unable to make any tie. Posted to a facebook group called "alt-riech" which was nothing but shitposting and memes. That's by the media's own fact checking in this case. Timothy Caughman - unable to make any tie. Appears to be exactly the same as the black guy who walked up to a white guy a few years ago and shot him. Reasoning is the same "wanted to kill x group" Srinivas Kuchibhotla - unable to make tie. Only sources are reportedlies and hearsay. Buckley Kuhn-Fricker & Scott Fricker tied together. Unable to make tie, claims of "nazi behavior." Again no evidence, only reportedlies and hearsay.
In all of those above cases, there are no direct ties, no ranting screeds. You know, I'm sure someone can bring out the "all those white people killed by blacks" over the last 20 years, and were killed just because they were white if they really wanted. I mean come on, it's not like BLM has come out saying hate whitey or to shoot cops or anything. Oh right, they've said both...
They've not held me to any standards? They've willingly misinterpreted something I said so they can play some lame 'gotcha'. I said there's no meaningful distinction between people who advocate for, act like and dress like Nazis and "real Nazis", a distinction that they said is meaningful because they're a proper "nerd" who cares about this kind of thing (I have no idea why 'nerds' specifically care about being illogical fucking pedants, you'd have to ask them).
They've held you to the exact standards you proposed, the very prose you used to make your statement. And again, you suddenly don't like the very rules you're using being used against you.
It's pathetic playground debate that only idiots would fall for, and it's a total waste of time to even pretend there's anything meaningful there for you to back up.
Yeah it is isn't it? Now ask yourself why your original arguments jumped right into that stinking pile of bullshit and why you're upset when someone starts playing those same rules against you.
That's a good reply and I agree with a lot of it. But really it's going to be a far deeper shitpile that we go through before any sense of normalcy and reason comes back into this. That is providing society doens't come crashing down around our ears first.
I doubt muslim grooming gangs are a problem in the US. What is a problem is the treatment of underage male prostitutes.
That you know of. Though there's been several cases popping up in US cities of it. Though we're talking about feminism here aren't we. The same group of people who railed around the "bringbackourgirls" bullshit, and is silent as all hell anyway.
There's tons of task forces and support for "sex trafficking victims", as long as they are girls. A "techbro" john hiring an adult prostitute has more chance of getting caught than a pederasterer.
Yeah, well welcome to being a MRA. Here's your complimentary t-shirt, dues are the 3rd wednesday of every month payable to the treasurer, and watch out for the feminists because they'll probably be lining up to attack you for daring to bring an issue like this to the front.
I might be cheering Trump - if he actually were to do anything about it. Sure, he got big tax cuts for corporations - but so far has done nothing to stop them from exporting jobs.
No? Guess you haven't been paying attention. Those tax cuts are one part of it, the other part that you probably didn't hear because the media didn't report on it was the economic outline strategy to remove the trade imbalance with China that are already in-force. AKA using the existing tools and not operating a government-by-fiat like Obama did.
And just because I might agree about the harm done by cheap imports doesn't mean I have to cheer a President who tells 180 degree false lies essentially constantly.
And what lies are those? And what are you going to do with the extra $2k in your paycheque? Think Obama gave that to you? How about you no longer being forced to buy obamacare insurance and having a deductible out your ass that wouldn't cover your care anyway. All lies right?
This is a society problem, not a tech problem. If we can't get people to raise kids properly, then it will have to be done in public schools I guess. I remember my wife telling me the (extremely famous and highly rated) university she went to had mandatory sex ed where they had to teach people how to use a condom. I got thought that shit in 6th grade (yeah, elementary school). Everything else (like, you know, rape is bad, m'kay) was drilled in my head since I was a toddler.
Most of the time it's not a society problem, it's a person problem. Though in some cases it is a social problem, and some groups of people are far worse. Look at it like this, the media and feminists fall all over screeching "dude tech-bros" and how we're all awful men. They'll screech over a couple of guys making a shitty dongle joke and ruin their lives. But they won't come out of the wood work when thousands of young girls are groomed, raped and forced into prostitution over 15 years. They'll even go as far as to defend the groups doing it, or helping to create a culture of fear to the point where both government and the police are afraid to arrest and charge the guilty parties for fear of being labeled racist.
But sure, in their mind it's without a doubt the "dude tech-bro" because he's the soft target. That isn't even touching on the absolute back-fuckwardness of those training groups where they'll even openly dismiss that women can be the aggressor party, commit sexual harassment and so on. Hell if I did some of the shit I've heard women talk about in women dominated offices, I'd never work again. Everything from how best to get pregnant from deception(poking holes in condoms/stopping BC or lying that they're on it), to openly talking about how large a guy's junk is in their suit. It it came out that a guy was saying any of that, and it was "accepted office culture" the media would go up one side, down the other, and you'd be DONE and fucked.
Considering everything that Weinstein has simply admitted to, why do you need to invent improbable theories that make him the victim?
Why are you making the assumption that he's a victim? Neither of them is a hero, neither is a victim. Both are whores selling themselves for differing things though, and neither had any care of the consequences of it. And both thought that they were getting something "of value" out of it as well, until they thought they no longer were. She's just as a shitty human being as he is, that's all there is to it.
Wouldn't have stopped Weinstein. He could easily afford expensive prostitutes, but that wasn't what he wanted. It was about power, forcing young actress to do things with him.
Half right. In some of those cases it was young actresses doing things with him in order to further their own career and getting some money on the side, that's on top of the rape claims which may or maynot ever be proven. Rose Mcgowan who started this current outbreak, took money as payment not to shush her up but as a pay-off for the sex to further her own career. And that's by her own admission, with that I also expect to hear something in a few years that the reason she "spoke out" was because she was spurned by him for someone newer(aka better looking model upgrade). In the end that doesn't make those women victims, it just makes them high priced prostitutes that got a movie deal on the side.
And before you reply, keep in mind that in nearly all of these cases it's not pressure that makes them do something. It's because they see the opportunity to use an asset to get something they wanted.
Same with trafficking. They want certain types of girl, otherwise why take the huge risks (sending your ID or using a work email) when for $50k a year you are not going to have difficulty getting laid?
The real question you should be asking is, who was behind the actual prostitution ring. These guys were the ones paying for it, but you can bet that beyond what is being said there is/was an organization that was directly working to sell that sex. There were busts here in Canada a few years ago, with a similar situation. There were people high up in the big name companies doing the same thing, and it was an elite invite-only/pay-in prostitution ring similar to Emperors Club VIP(that was the big prostitution scandal in NYC).
Correction it's in there now. Two days later, in a country that lives and breathes news and money, and the stock market doesn't goto sleep between boxing day and the 31's unless it's a weekend.
The Nazis had as a goal literal genocide for multiple different groups, and they managed to kill millions of people. There's a pretty massive difference in moral weight at work here.
So did the communists. Ask the people who got the bullet under Mao and Pol Pot.
Yeah, yeah, the crazy feminist who runs your local community college's woman's studies program is pretty annoying, amiright? But then you've got Harvey Weinstein.
Ah, just the right place to start. Instead of properly attacking the problem of creepy fucks like Weinstein, the crazy feminists you speak of go the #metoo route. Which is making more problems than it fixes. A world where due process is thrown out with the pursuit of justice isn't going to be quite like most women want.
To be perfectly honest, it seems more like those "male feminist allies" are the problem, and since they can't compete any other way they're using the ally path as a means of reproduction. It's not dissimilar to the anti-gamergaters, who turn out to be committing sexual assault, rape, and calling in bomb threats. Projection all the fucking way down. In a year or two, it won't surprise me if this becomes similar to the "anti-gay firebrand" who ends up being caught engaging in the exact stuff that they were railing against.
And let me say, watch the video. Watch it. Sure it's 30 minutes long, but every single one of the people promoted themselves as "male feminist allies" every single one, and went out of their way to attack anyone else who dared to question the feminist talking points or narrative. Just like those anti-gay firebrands.
You know it's been going on since the 27/28th right? CNN reported nothing on it until yesterday. It was covered heavily in SEA media(JP, S.Korea, and Singapore) in both local and english dailies though. They have a point, these are major protests and it took CNN 2 days or call it 3 days before they reported on it, but they were talking damn near non-stop on all of their channels about that white truck. Hell it was the top thing on CNN while I was waiting for the train to pick me up on the 28th in Tokyo.
Slashdot Mirror
Vehicular manslaughter apologist, nice to meet you.
Injuries are inconsistent with that as reported in the media. There is no "strike damage to the lower torso" no broken bones, no fractures, no head injury. The air bags on the car weren't even deployed. Those are all facts you can find in the media, the mainstream press at that.
It's exactly what the article says. The guy who shot the cops in Colorado on Sunday was an alt-right jackoff who posted Pepe memes.
No it doesn't. The article makes the ASSUMPTION that's the case. Now read the rest of the article where it says:
Riehl seemed to have a grudge against local police officers, and posted multiple complaints about the Douglas County Sheriffâ(TM)s Department on YouTube.
Specifically, the AP notes that Riehl in a December video called for âoethe firing of Douglas County Sheriff Tony Spurlockâ and attacked him âoein highly personal terms.â Riehl also said that during that video that he would be running as a âoelibertarianâ candidate for Douglas County Sheriff.
Really, stop with the bullshit and shoehorning. All it does is show you're carrying an agenda that doesn't fit the real world.
alt-right jackoff with actual Pepe memes on his Facebook page.
That's not even what the article says, if you got any further into crazy land by seeing what you can only see? I'd recommend psychiatric help.
In the past the word antisemitism used to refer to people who wanted to abuse and brutalize anyone who is of Jewish descent, not to people who have legitimate criticism against Jewish religion.
Then by all means check UoT, McGill and UofM, you'll hit that "wanted to abuse and brutalize anyone who is of Jewish descent." UofM was bad enough ~6 years ago that Israeli students were leaving the campus.
Did you even read the article you linked to?
Did you even read the article I linked to? Only one university responded, and even at that they "only disagreed" because the faculty at that one university is knee deep in BDS.
We can truly recycle paper - make old paper into paper
Fuck no. It takes twice as much energy to recycle paper then it does to have sustainable forestry. Recycled paper has to go back through the entire cellulose-separation and dying/bleaching and re-drying phase. There's a lot of waste out of all of that. Use that old paper waste for anything else, heating, insulation, compost, mix with landfills to produce biogas whatever. There's a million better things to do with it.
And still not a single connection to the perpetrators of those crimes having anything to do with the antifascist movement.
No? That's why antifa, bamn and blm have all been working together.
Oh, you're a comedian.
No, I'm factual. Something that your previous posts could even hit.
Uh-huh. A different flavor of nazi.
Thanks for carving up the world into "nazi and not nazi" you're the shining beacon on the hill of a fascist.
Shitposting and memes were how nazis communicated in 2017.
No, it really wasn't. But if they did, you'd be the first one to be a nazi yourself.
No, but all nazis shitpost.
And all fascists engage in fallacies. Glad to see we've sorted this one out.
Erm. Then what caused the blunt force injury to the chest?
Falling? Hitting a curb? Bollards? Crowd itself? There's a lot of things that can cause a blunt force injury to the chest. Also, you can have a blunt force injury to the chest from the heart attack itself as the muscles in the chest contract so hard they'll tear and cause traumatic bruising similar to a punch.
Hmm... well... You've got your organized antifa groups(again). You've got entrenched academia pushing identity politics and identiarianism. There is a nasty undercurrent of antisemitism. They'll claim that the reason that everything is failing is because of whites, sometimes asians. If you dare step off that line of thinking, you'll be harassed, attacked(socially and sometimes physically). If you dare to question what they're telling you, they will react in a violent manner. Yes...seems like the left have a real problem.
So yeah, those of us who actually have a clue, the sixty-some+ year-olds who've either lived or witnessed the horrors of war and genocide are going to do their damnest so that clueless free-speech-flag waiving little millenials like you never have to live through this hell.
And there comes the authoritarian line that attacks free speech. Because as we all know, hiding in the dark does wonders! A disenfranchised group of people who are already being marginalized by a particular group of people simply won't draw more people to them. Not at all.
Why the fuck did this get (+1)? Is "jew hating" the new blood libel?
Ask academia. There's plenty of jew hating and antisemitism coming from left-wing groups on university campuses. I mean this is from a university in my own province and it's coming directly out of the leftwing halls in those universities. And it's sure not limited to Canada, but EU universities and US universities. So much so that the difference between a far-right extremist and a far-left extremist simply boils down to who's got more power at the moment and how they can wield it. Right now? That's the left, and in many countries they've had institutional power in universities for over a generation.
Remember those 5 cops killed in Dallas(plus 12 injured) in 2017? Yeah, he bought into the anti-fascist/anti-cop rhetoric. So was the female cop sitting in the evidence van and had her brains smeared all over the inside. Oh did I mention she was also black and a single parent, and the person was also an anti-fascist/anti-cop nut. Then there were the two troopers in Georgia, another in Tennessee again the same garbage. And that's off the top of my head. Several more in Michigan, and on and on and on. Out of those, almost every case the person was an anti-cop and/or anti-fascist nut, who left behind long screeds justifying their murder of people.
Despite your list up at the top:
Heather Heyer - not directly killed, hasn't been proven in court. Maybe indirectly. Was not struck by the vehicle, died of heart attack. Was massively overweight, and a chain smoker.
Taliesin Namkai Meche - Not killed by a nazi, but by a supremacist of a different flavor.
Ricky Best - Same as above, linked to same story as Meche. Also suspect has yet to have their day in court.
Richard Collins III - unable to make any tie. Posted to a facebook group called "alt-riech" which was nothing but shitposting and memes. That's by the media's own fact checking in this case.
Timothy Caughman - unable to make any tie. Appears to be exactly the same as the black guy who walked up to a white guy a few years ago and shot him. Reasoning is the same "wanted to kill x group"
Srinivas Kuchibhotla - unable to make tie. Only sources are reportedlies and hearsay.
Buckley Kuhn-Fricker & Scott Fricker tied together. Unable to make tie, claims of "nazi behavior." Again no evidence, only reportedlies and hearsay.
In all of those above cases, there are no direct ties, no ranting screeds. You know, I'm sure someone can bring out the "all those white people killed by blacks" over the last 20 years, and were killed just because they were white if they really wanted. I mean come on, it's not like BLM has come out saying hate whitey or to shoot cops or anything. Oh right, they've said both...
They've not held me to any standards? They've willingly misinterpreted something I said so they can play some lame 'gotcha'. I said there's no meaningful distinction between people who advocate for, act like and dress like Nazis and "real Nazis", a distinction that they said is meaningful because they're a proper "nerd" who cares about this kind of thing (I have no idea why 'nerds' specifically care about being illogical fucking pedants, you'd have to ask them).
They've held you to the exact standards you proposed, the very prose you used to make your statement. And again, you suddenly don't like the very rules you're using being used against you.
It's pathetic playground debate that only idiots would fall for, and it's a total waste of time to even pretend there's anything meaningful there for you to back up.
Yeah it is isn't it? Now ask yourself why your original arguments jumped right into that stinking pile of bullshit and why you're upset when someone starts playing those same rules against you.
That's a good reply and I agree with a lot of it. But really it's going to be a far deeper shitpile that we go through before any sense of normalcy and reason comes back into this. That is providing society doens't come crashing down around our ears first.
I doubt muslim grooming gangs are a problem in the US. What is a problem is the treatment of underage male prostitutes.
That you know of. Though there's been several cases popping up in US cities of it. Though we're talking about feminism here aren't we. The same group of people who railed around the "bringbackourgirls" bullshit, and is silent as all hell anyway.
There's tons of task forces and support for "sex trafficking victims", as long as they are girls. A "techbro" john hiring an adult prostitute has more chance of getting caught than a pederasterer.
Yeah, well welcome to being a MRA. Here's your complimentary t-shirt, dues are the 3rd wednesday of every month payable to the treasurer, and watch out for the feminists because they'll probably be lining up to attack you for daring to bring an issue like this to the front.
I might be cheering Trump - if he actually were to do anything about it. Sure, he got big tax cuts for corporations - but so far has done nothing to stop them from exporting jobs.
No? Guess you haven't been paying attention. Those tax cuts are one part of it, the other part that you probably didn't hear because the media didn't report on it was the economic outline strategy to remove the trade imbalance with China that are already in-force. AKA using the existing tools and not operating a government-by-fiat like Obama did.
And just because I might agree about the harm done by cheap imports doesn't mean I have to cheer a President who tells 180 degree false lies essentially constantly.
And what lies are those? And what are you going to do with the extra $2k in your paycheque? Think Obama gave that to you? How about you no longer being forced to buy obamacare insurance and having a deductible out your ass that wouldn't cover your care anyway. All lies right?
This is a society problem, not a tech problem. If we can't get people to raise kids properly, then it will have to be done in public schools I guess. I remember my wife telling me the (extremely famous and highly rated) university she went to had mandatory sex ed where they had to teach people how to use a condom. I got thought that shit in 6th grade (yeah, elementary school). Everything else (like, you know, rape is bad, m'kay) was drilled in my head since I was a toddler.
Most of the time it's not a society problem, it's a person problem. Though in some cases it is a social problem, and some groups of people are far worse. Look at it like this, the media and feminists fall all over screeching "dude tech-bros" and how we're all awful men. They'll screech over a couple of guys making a shitty dongle joke and ruin their lives. But they won't come out of the wood work when thousands of young girls are groomed, raped and forced into prostitution over 15 years. They'll even go as far as to defend the groups doing it, or helping to create a culture of fear to the point where both government and the police are afraid to arrest and charge the guilty parties for fear of being labeled racist.
But sure, in their mind it's without a doubt the "dude tech-bro" because he's the soft target. That isn't even touching on the absolute back-fuckwardness of those training groups where they'll even openly dismiss that women can be the aggressor party, commit sexual harassment and so on. Hell if I did some of the shit I've heard women talk about in women dominated offices, I'd never work again. Everything from how best to get pregnant from deception(poking holes in condoms/stopping BC or lying that they're on it), to openly talking about how large a guy's junk is in their suit. It it came out that a guy was saying any of that, and it was "accepted office culture" the media would go up one side, down the other, and you'd be DONE and fucked.
I'd make a distinction between "western media" and "US media".
I live in Brussels (Capitol of EU), and heard about the protests earlier.
I wouldn't. Nearly all of the big "byline" companies are based out of the US, even AFP has it's primary newsroom in the US.
Considering everything that Weinstein has simply admitted to, why do you need to invent improbable theories that make him the victim?
Why are you making the assumption that he's a victim? Neither of them is a hero, neither is a victim. Both are whores selling themselves for differing things though, and neither had any care of the consequences of it. And both thought that they were getting something "of value" out of it as well, until they thought they no longer were. She's just as a shitty human being as he is, that's all there is to it.
Wouldn't have stopped Weinstein. He could easily afford expensive prostitutes, but that wasn't what he wanted. It was about power, forcing young actress to do things with him.
Half right. In some of those cases it was young actresses doing things with him in order to further their own career and getting some money on the side, that's on top of the rape claims which may or maynot ever be proven. Rose Mcgowan who started this current outbreak, took money as payment not to shush her up but as a pay-off for the sex to further her own career. And that's by her own admission, with that I also expect to hear something in a few years that the reason she "spoke out" was because she was spurned by him for someone newer(aka better looking model upgrade). In the end that doesn't make those women victims, it just makes them high priced prostitutes that got a movie deal on the side.
And before you reply, keep in mind that in nearly all of these cases it's not pressure that makes them do something. It's because they see the opportunity to use an asset to get something they wanted.
Same with trafficking. They want certain types of girl, otherwise why take the huge risks (sending your ID or using a work email) when for $50k a year you are not going to have difficulty getting laid?
The real question you should be asking is, who was behind the actual prostitution ring. These guys were the ones paying for it, but you can bet that beyond what is being said there is/was an organization that was directly working to sell that sex. There were busts here in Canada a few years ago, with a similar situation. There were people high up in the big name companies doing the same thing, and it was an elite invite-only/pay-in prostitution ring similar to Emperors Club VIP(that was the big prostitution scandal in NYC).
Correction it's in there now. Two days later, in a country that lives and breathes news and money, and the stock market doesn't goto sleep between boxing day and the 31's unless it's a weekend.
The Nazis had as a goal literal genocide for multiple different groups, and they managed to kill millions of people. There's a pretty massive difference in moral weight at work here.
So did the communists. Ask the people who got the bullet under Mao and Pol Pot.
Yeah, yeah, the crazy feminist who runs your local community college's woman's studies program is pretty annoying, amiright? But then you've got Harvey Weinstein.
Ah, just the right place to start. Instead of properly attacking the problem of creepy fucks like Weinstein, the crazy feminists you speak of go the #metoo route. Which is making more problems than it fixes. A world where due process is thrown out with the pursuit of justice isn't going to be quite like most women want.
To be perfectly honest, it seems more like those "male feminist allies" are the problem, and since they can't compete any other way they're using the ally path as a means of reproduction. It's not dissimilar to the anti-gamergaters, who turn out to be committing sexual assault, rape, and calling in bomb threats. Projection all the fucking way down. In a year or two, it won't surprise me if this becomes similar to the "anti-gay firebrand" who ends up being caught engaging in the exact stuff that they were railing against.
And let me say, watch the video. Watch it. Sure it's 30 minutes long, but every single one of the people promoted themselves as "male feminist allies" every single one, and went out of their way to attack anyone else who dared to question the feminist talking points or narrative. Just like those anti-gay firebrands.
You know it's been going on since the 27/28th right? CNN reported nothing on it until yesterday. It was covered heavily in SEA media(JP, S.Korea, and Singapore) in both local and english dailies though. They have a point, these are major protests and it took CNN 2 days or call it 3 days before they reported on it, but they were talking damn near non-stop on all of their channels about that white truck. Hell it was the top thing on CNN while I was waiting for the train to pick me up on the 28th in Tokyo.
Ah the old argument of "it's just not the right kind of socialism..."