Slashdot Mirror


In a Declining Comics Market, DC Beats Marvel (hollywoodreporter.com)

An anonymous reader quotes the Hollywood Reporter: Looking at the most-ordered comic books in the North American comic market, DC Entertainment had a particularly strong year, with seven of the top 10 issues of the year being published by the home of Superman, Batman and the Justice League... just three years ago, not one DC title made it to the list, with nine titles coming from Marvel alone. (By comparison, Marvel takes just three places this year, with one of those due to its inclusion in a subscription mystery box service)... Perhaps surprisingly, the big winner of 2017 looking at the top 10 list is DC's crossover between its DC Universe and Watchmen properties. The first issue of the Doomsday Clock series charted third â" and could end up higher on the final list for the year, depending on re-order numbers in December â" but all four issues of the prologue storyline "The Button," from summer issues of Batman and The Flash, also made it into the top 10.

it's worth noting that, across the board, order numbers for comics in the North American market fell 10 percent compared with last year. The market is shrinking, unless something turns it around soon... One last thing to note about the year's top 10, and also the comic market as it currently exists in general: It's probably time to stop pretending that mass media projects significantly impact comic book orders. In a year with Justice League, Wonder Woman, Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2, Logan, Thor: Ragnarok and Spider-Man: Homecoming in theaters, there isn't a Justice League, Wonder Woman, Guardians of the Galaxy, Wolverine, Thor or Spider-Man title in the top 10. Indeed, Marvel has just canceled the Guardians of the Galaxy comic book series.

Mavel had the most-ordered comic book of the year -- Marvel Legacy No. 1 -- though the article notes that all of its numbers are inevitably skewed by "ordering incentives put in place by publishers that require that a certain number of copies are ordered by stores in order to achieve a specific discount."

159 comments

  1. They all pale in comparison to mangas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can you not want to read something called Dirty Pair Flash?

    1. Re:They all pale in comparison to mangas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's because Marvel makes such good films that fewer people buy their comics. DC makes such shit films that people hang on to reading the comics.

      Marvel > DC
      Iron Man > Batman
      Hulk > Superman

  2. SJW Marvel by Kunedog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe it helps that DC headliners haven't (yet) been replaced with disastrous forced diversity versions?

    1. Re:SJW Marvel by JoshuaZ · · Score: 0

      What diversity versions are you talking about? The two examples one could most argue are "forced diversity versions" (never mind that not having almost all characters be white might actually be a reasonable thing given actual real life demographics) are Miles Morales as an alternate universe Spider-Man https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spider-Man_(Miles_Morales) and Kamala Khan as Ms. Marvel https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ms._Marvel_(Kamala_Khan)#Sales. The Morales version of Spider-Man has had its own series independent from the regular Peter Parker Spider-Man, so it isn't like having Morales somehow interferes with the usual Spider-Man. Meanwhile, Ms. Marvel has sold very well https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ms._Marvel_(Kamala_Khan)#Sales. So who are these "disastrous forced diversity versions" that are harming Marvel's sales?

    2. Re:SJW Marvel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Female Thor.
      Black, female Iron Man.

      They've also made established characters gay now, like Iceman.

    3. Re:SJW Marvel by lucasnate1 · · Score: 0

      If you look at old superman comics, especially the ones devoted to Lois Lane. You would see lots of covers depiciting Superman physically abusing Lois in order to "educate her". You can say that these are "patriarchial" just as much as today's comics are SJW. However, I think that this is just part of a general trend. When art is done purely for big money, it will eventually try to satisfy big money by acting as a propoganda vessel.

    4. Re:SJW Marvel by MightyMartian · · Score: 0, Troll

      Nonsense! When the Fourth Reich arises, those pesky minorities will be put in their place, and the White Man will once again be pre-eminent, you know, sort of like he is now, when he's not sitting there sobbing like the delicate snowflake that he is because someone dared to make a black or gay superhero.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    5. Re:SJW Marvel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps the stories should just be told in a way that they sell on their merits as a story.

      Shoehorning in artificial diversity has proven quite profitable...for DC.

    6. Re:SJW Marvel by JoshuaZ · · Score: 0

      By "Female Thor" do you mean Jane Foster https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jane_Foster_(comics) or do you mean Thor Girl https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thor_Girl? Since Thor Girl was from the early 2000s I'm guessing you mean Foster, although that does a good job by itself showing that female versions of Thor aren't some miraculous recent thing. The current "Mighty Thor" comic does focus on Foster http://marvel.com/comics/series/20527/mighty_thor_2015_-_present, but there are two problems with that argument. First, Thor Odinson is still a major character in other Marvel lines including Secret Empire https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secret_Empire_(comics), and second while Mighty Thor has sold poorly, so have many other Marvel titles, including some very long-running ones. In that regard the "Mighty Thor" comic is about middle of the pack; hardly what one would expect if it were so bad it would be dragging everything else down.

      As for the Iron Man, since you specified black *female* Iron Man, I presume you mean Riri Williams, since a black male Iron Man was done about 20 years ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Machine#The_all_new_Iron_Man as James Rhodes (before he got his own War Machine title). It is true that the Riri Williams Iron Man has sold poorly and had negative reviews, but those reviews have focused on poor story writing, poor drawing and poor editing. See for example https://www.bleedingcool.com/2017/08/24/generations-iron-man-ironheart-1-review/ and has little to do with Riri Williams as a character (although I'll certainly volunteer that she does come across as a Mary Sue).

      So where is the evidence that any of these characters have failed due to being "forced diversity versions"?

    7. Re: SJW Marvel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did the above get modded +1 and the uneducated troll claiming the difference was due to forced diversity get a +4?

      This is a +5 post. The moderator is clueless.

    8. Re:SJW Marvel by Kohath · · Score: 1

      ...it will eventually try to satisfy big money by acting as a propoganda vessel.

      "Big money" doesn't control the readers. Propaganda doesn't sell unless you're telling the readers what they want to hear.

    9. Re:SJW Marvel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not giving evidence they're to blame, I'm saying that there was a wave all at once to where the media picked up on it.

      I think sales are down because comics in general are dying, and when DC wins, it's usually because Batman/Superman/WW had some good story arcs.

    10. Re:SJW Marvel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      War Machine was his own superhero. Superheroes may temporarily die or ask a friend to wear their costume; or a friend might wear a costume to keep a weakened superhero from danger. But, Tony Stark did not become Tanya Stark.

      Changing Captain Marvel, Iron Man, Thor, Spiderman, The Flash, Aquaman, Hulk, etc. is just pandering. Create a new superhero and let the existing superheroes introduce them. That's how Dad did it, that's how America does it, and it's worked out pretty well so far.

    11. Re: SJW Marvel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "cdreimer

      The stories should reflect society as it is today. White men controlling everything is so 1950's."

      Why are there people with superpowers then?
      Why did sales of those comics set records for abysmal performance?

      As usual, you're flat out wrong about everything. SJWâ(TM)s don't care for comics, and pandering to them only pisses off the base.
      People are getting fed up with the vocal SJW minority, new wave femanism, and the Entitlement Generation in general. That's why we have a dickhead like Trump in office, that's why forced diversity isn't selling. Pull your head out of your ass and quit posting your drivel here.

    12. Re:SJW Marvel by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, too bad people don't BUY diversity comic books in the real world.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    13. Re:SJW Marvel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Black, female Iron Man.

      Is her name Patty Patina?

      CAPTCHA: knockers -- hahahaha!

    14. Re:SJW Marvel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no discussion that cannot be easily solved by calling the other a nazi.

    15. Re:SJW Marvel by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      How about America? A comic that Marvel promoted the hell out of, written by an openly virulent man-hating anti-white racist? This was a comic from Marvel, mind you (not some indie company), which featured a superhero who attacked white people and men in every issue--a comic from Marvel that portrayed white men as the ultimate villains in society.

      Hey, remember when comic books used to have a broad market, including both kids and adults? Well, would anyone in their RIGHT FUCKING MIND want their kid reading America?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    16. Re: SJW Marvel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump is the dying breath of white power after 400+ years. The majority of Americans by 2050 will be minorities.

    17. Re:SJW Marvel by Z80a · · Score: 2

      I don't think it was the diversity itself, but the whining.
      This "cult" is basically unable to make actually cool characters because the politics IS THE MOST IMPORTANT THING EVER and must be hammered and forced down the throat, at a point there's this female thor comic that does very whiny references to the freaking gamergate.

      Meanwhile, everyone, including the intended "minority audience" just move away to japanese mangas and anime, as they deliver the cool stuff.

    18. Re:SJW Marvel by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      And the national anthem protests by NFL players hasn't caused ratings to crater while leaving empty seats at stadiums.

      Ah, so that really happened? I thought South Park was just inventing shit again.

      I guess they're still relevant then.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    19. Re:SJW Marvel by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh yeah? What about two nazis arguing against one another? What happens then?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    20. Re:SJW Marvel by dirk · · Score: 1

      Out of everyone you listed, I believe on Aquaman has been the same person from the beginning. There were 3 Captain Marvels (Mar-vell, Monica Rambeau, and Carol Danvers), at least 4 Iron Men (Tony, Rhodey, Riri, and Doom), about 5 Thors, 3 Spidermen that I can think of off the top of my head (and probably more), 4 Flashes, and at least 3 Hulks. But please tell me again how changing the character is something that just isn't done.

      --

      "Information wants to be expensive" - Stewart Brand, the same guy who said "Information wants to be free"
    21. Re:SJW Marvel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Diversity exists. But not in the percentages we see in TV and media lately. Every show has a gay person. Because of this, American's assume that nearly 1:4 people are gay, when in reality is more like 1:25 (http://news.gallup.com/poll/183383/americans-greatly-overestimate-percent-gay-lesbian.aspx).

    22. Re: SJW Marvel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The majority of Americans by 2050 will be minorities.

      So will every neighborhood then look like black neighborhoods do now?

    23. Re: SJW Marvel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa there. Context.

      While the census may reflect 1:25 in some states, it's certainly 1:4 in cities, and when you include trans people, the ratio is closer to 1:3 should be GLBTQ to meet the diversity ratio of NYC, SF, LA, Seattle or
      Portland, or Austin. Since nearly every TV show takes place in LA, Seattle or New York, that is correct.

      But the race diversity isn't ever hit because most television programs are not filmed on location. Canada (Vancouver specificly) does not have a large black Population, but has a large Asian population. So ironically , you see the same two black actors in every production in Vancouver.

    24. Re:SJW Marvel by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting point. Rhodes was much more acceptable because he had paid his dues, was a regular character, and made sense to drop in the iron man suit.

      I had stopped buying comic books due to exploding prices by the time Riri Williams put on the suit so I don't know if she was a side character for several years first or not.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    25. Re: SJW Marvel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes they do, but they get it from the indies. Making an iconic superhero female, black or gay doesn't increase the selling point because it is still iconic character that we've seen before, and only the backstory has changed.

      This is why Japanese comics do so well with the GLBTQ crowd, despite the comics being in black and white and produced on shoestring budgets, they have no corporate content filter. If it doesn't sell to a publisher, you sell it at comiket.

        You can't do that in the US. If you do not have a publisher, your only option is a local comiccon if one exists, and they tend to cost a lot of money if they aren't in your city. Your best bet is putting it online for free, and hoping people will pay for it via Patreon, or not block ads. Which given how awful people are on the internet today, people who don't read your comic will pirate it out of spite to hurt you.

    26. Re: SJW Marvel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that's the goal. Then no one will have a socioeconomic status different from another.

    27. Re: SJW Marvel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1:3 in cities?
      Which cities? Sodom and Gomorrah?

    28. Re:SJW Marvel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You want minority or whatever characters? Make new ones. Don't destroy the good ones in the name of changing a superficial and, supposedly meaningless, characteristic.

    29. Re:SJW Marvel by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Nonsense! When the Fourth Reich arises, those pesky minorities will be put in their place, and the White Man will once again be pre-eminent, you know, sort of like he is now, when he's not sitting there sobbing like the delicate snowflake that he is because someone dared to make a black or gay superhero.

      At least in America, the "white man" will become a minority in the not too distant future http://www.washingtonexaminer.... 2044 is the projected date.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    30. Re:SJW Marvel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Glad you missed my point. Changing a superhero for the purpose of diversity is pandering. Changing them to tell a story (temporary death, friend wearing suit, etc) is not pandering. I do not actually care if Tony Stark is White, Black, Asian, Hispanic, Male, Female, Non-Binary, Straight, Gay, Disabled, etc. No cares at all. I only begin to care when it is clear someone is trying to pander to one group or another. Make a great story, I'm in. Pander to a specific group in an obvious way, I'm out. Period. This may be why Marvel is hurting.

    31. Re:SJW Marvel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing indicating that DC has gained any market share, so all we're seeing is a Marvel bubble being deflated. Which makes sense considering a lot of people might have gotten into comics due to the movies, and simply haven't been impressed enough to stick around. DC, on the other hand, hasn't really done too well in the movie department, so they never had the same type of conversion bubble.

      But I get you are just looking for something to reinforce your opinion rather than actually considering more realistic scenarios.

    32. Re:SJW Marvel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Female Thor.
      Black, female Iron Man.

      Don't forget the transgender Transformers.

      https://www.bleedingcool.com/2017/07/27/lug-anode-trans-transformers-lost-light

    33. Re:SJW Marvel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We should use your stories instead, especially your fantastic haikus.

      Those still set to drop on January 1st, you bloated walking corpse?

    34. Re:SJW Marvel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    35. Re:SJW Marvel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not the "forced diversity". Its the way Marvel handles its advertising for new books, leaving them to languish and canceling them when they don't sell due to lack of exposure.

    36. Re:SJW Marvel by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      I kind of enjoyed NAZI Captain America. Can't imagine how that would turn people off the character.

    37. Re:SJW Marvel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia the sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave owners will be able to sit down together at the table of brotherhood.

      I have a dream that one day even the state of Mississippi, a state sweltering with the heat of injustice, sweltering with the heat of oppression, will be transformed into an oasis of freedom and justice.

      I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.

      You judge everyone by the color of their skin - in the name of "diversity".

      Go fuck yourself with your superficial, literally skin-deep "diversity".

    38. Re:SJW Marvel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing wrong with adding new, diverse, characters. What gets people riled up is when existing characters are changed and retconned, with zero regard for history or continuity, just to pander to the "diversity"-above-reason mob.

      Let's take the cinematic elephant in the room: Nick Fury. Yes, there's no denying that Samuel L Jackson is a bad motherfucker. But Nick Fury should NOT be black. Colonel Fury has been running black ops with SHIELD, the OSS, the CIA, and various other agencies, since WW2. He is clinically immortal and ageless via the Infinity Formua, a derivitave of an immortality elixer developed by Issac Newton. Now, just what are the chances, do you think, that a black man would have been commanding special ops departments and forces in the american armed services in the 1940s and 1950s. Just. About. Zero. But somewhere there was a diversity checklist, and no one had put an X in the "black" box. So Nick Fury was changed. The same thing happened with the Human Torch, for that matter; though there's no real reason Johnny Storm shouldn't be black, so it's more forgivable in that case.

      Others have already mentioned the genderflips pf Thor and Iron Man. So, theres that as well.

    39. Re:SJW Marvel by MightyMartian · · Score: 0

      What me? Nah, I think it's a crime against the white man to have hispanics being dressed up in white man hero's pajamas! How dare those SJWs! You and I should get together and form some sort of gang to hound these race traitors.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    40. Re:SJW Marvel by JoshuaZ · · Score: 1

      She was not a pre-existing character, which is an interesting point, and certainly a more valid point than most of the other responses (apparently there are a lot of people who are engaging in the I-disagree-so-I-will-mod-down line of thinking on this conversation).

    41. Re:SJW Marvel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Making Thor female is pretty much sacrilege (literally depending on who you are talking to). It's some kind of dumb pander, just like hispanic spider man who replaces the DEAD Peter Parker, and the asian hulk and the black girl iron man. They also made Donald Trump into comical villain MODOC, instead changing him to "MODAAK".
      Marvel is pandering heavily in politics, if you don't agree with them you know you shouldn't be reading them.
      If they had stuck to comic book stories instead of being 1000% partisan drek, they'd definitely be doing better.

    42. Re: SJW Marvel by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I'd be very surprised at 1:3. The highest estimates I've seen are about 15%. In my personal experience (living in fairly liberal university cities) it's about 10%. It's always a bit difficult to measure, because a lot of people simply don't advertise their sexuality in any way and some are in the closet, but neither 33% nor 4% sound particularly plausible.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    43. Re: SJW Marvel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing our art is controlled by committe now to force this to happen rather than by artists

    44. Re:SJW Marvel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Superman is infamously a dick on covers. It's not so much propaganda as it is enticing readers to buy the comic and figure out why the hell Superman is forcing Jimmy Olsen and Aquaman to compete for a glass of water in the desert (look it up: #115, Survival Of The Fittest)

    45. Re: SJW Marvel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While the census may reflect 1:25 in some states, it's certainly 1:4 in cities

      Utter bullshit.

    46. Re: SJW Marvel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know where you get your impression but it is wrong. 4% of adults: that is the fact.

    47. Re:SJW Marvel by DeVilla · · Score: 1

      You know, I don't get the impression that's true. Certainly, some folks only want to see things that reinforces their existing beliefs, but some of the most interesting works are those that introduce something different. But they have to do so in a compelling way with characters that behave in believable ways (given the nature of their fictional environment, such as a world where super powers exist).

      The focus has to be the story & the characters and how to convey that to the audience. I haven't seen any of the recent comics and I've hear little of them. But I get the impression that the focus isn't the characters or the plot. It's merely the author's 'cause' and a chance to stand at the pulpit. Kind of like how M.A.S.H. would get annoying during the Alan Alda anti-war sermons.

      That said, I suspect a well crafted story and interesting characters could sell propaganda.

    48. Re:SJW Marvel by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

      Ok, then let's switch to all the war propoganda comics instead.

    49. Re:SJW Marvel by dirk · · Score: 1

      But why do you assume these changes were made for purely diversity? There was a story behind most of them (Monica Rambeau was trademark more than anything). There is a story reason why Jane Foster is Thor now. There is a storyline reason why Riri is Iron Man (well, Iron Heart). There is a storyline reason Amadeus Cho is the Hulk and why Jen Walters started referring to herself as Hulk instead of SheHulk. Hell, there is more storyline to most of these than things like the Flash going through so many people (and that is ignoring the golden age flash) or why Rhodey put on the armor. You assume if something changes it must be diversity, but the fact is, why not have the change also encompass diversity? There is no reason every Flash has to be a white guy. There's no reason every person to put on Batman outfit has to be a white man. If they are going to make a change for storyline purposes, why can't it be a diversity change as well?

      --

      "Information wants to be expensive" - Stewart Brand, the same guy who said "Information wants to be free"
  3. Hm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    where to get x-ray glasses when comics go the way of landlines?

  4. Focus by gurps_npc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Marvel focuses on movies and does a good job there, leaving their second string people to work on the comics.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:Focus by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      Yeah that is my nightmare scenario right there: comics market declining and these companies deciding to focus on cranking out more godawful superhero crap for the silver screen.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re:Focus by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      It's not all total crap. Wonder Woman was one of the more entertaining movies that I watched in the past year. But yeah, the rest were forgettable.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    3. Re:Focus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. They have nothing to do with each other. SJW Marvel Comics went out and destroyed all of the big heroes and replaced them diversity replacements all in about a year. I mean ALL of them. Now the comics are all about twitter feelings and fighting racism. None of the writers had any experience with comics or marvel's history. Go read America or Ms Marvel. Those comics are pure far left propaganda. They ruined most of the market and a lot of comic stores actually went out of business just because of this.

      The movies are based on the original heroes. Present Marvel Comics destroyed everything you know and love about comics and it's getting fixed by Disney by firing all those SJW twitter writers they brought in 3 years ago. Just search YouTube, there are 1000's of videos about this.

    4. Re:Focus by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

      Why is it a nightmare scenario? It would allow new actors to tke center stage. Hell, I would be very happy if marvel and dc just disappeared of the face of the earth.

    5. Re:Focus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it was better than most of the Marvel movies I've seen like Guardians of the Galaxy. Wonder Woman actually had a theme. There was still some odd stuff in it, but it was actually decent.

    6. Re:Focus by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Seriously? It had some good explosions, but I tried finding a single point in the movie where the characters actions actually made sense given their backgrounds and motivations, and couldn't find a single one. Maybe if you've read the comics, there's enough extra backstory for it to make sense, but it was basically run, jump, do nonsensical thing, explosion, all the way through.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    7. Re:Focus by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Except for the big fight scene at the end, the action was not really as you describe. Far more bullet dodging and hand-to-hand combat until the very end. But even so, that sort of action is expected at a bare minimum in a Superhero movie. I thought the story seemed OK - I mean, obviously you have to accept the alternate history and the supernatural stuff. The magic truth-telling lasso is certainly an interesting way to dodge the whole trust issue that would have naturally cropped up. You can pick stuff apart to death, but I found the character development interesting enough.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  5. Probably b/c tweeners are buying most of the books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Marvel sells their stuff to older teenage boys.

  6. Marvel movies done well, screwed own comics by JoshuaZ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Marvel has done really well with their movies, but they've screwed themselves over in multiple ways with their comics. The biggest is that continuing their disagreement with Fox, where Fox still has the rights to X-Men movie franchises, and Marvel isn't happy about that, they kept Wolverine dead for 3 years, which in comic time is almost an eternity http://www.iswolverinestilldead.com/. This seems to have been essentially because he was one of the most popular of the X-Men characters. So they were willing to shoot themselves in the foot in order to be able to say "screw you" to Fox even as it only hurt Marvel's bottom line. The last few years, Marvel has had a lot of little petty things like this that haven't helped the brand.

    1. Re:Marvel movies done well, screwed own comics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice try. The colossal success of the Marvel movies - with the old characters meant that they took their eye off the comics. Marvel comics were converged by SJWs... they rejigged their editorial staff so it was 80% women (and climbing - as they force out more men). They then replaced all their popular characters with diversity characters and diversity stories in which you are lectured about diversity by a blue-haired loon regurgitating she shit she blew money on studying at university - and that made her unemployable.

      The predictable result - a complete cratering of the sales.

      What happens next will determine whether Marvel comics has a future. DC just hired one of Marvel's chief SJWs (why? Good question. He's one of the idiots responsible for the current fiasco and was shoved out to be replaced by yet another useless diversity woman).

      So if DC follows Marvel down... they may both survive on life support. If DC rejects the SJW-isation... the money-men at Disney might actually do something as it continues to crater compared to DC.

      Frankly, I doubt DC will resist. It will be converged like Marvel... and both will end up in the shitter of history.

    2. Re:Marvel movies done well, screwed own comics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      those early rights that marvel sold off (along with early star wars) is the driving factor in disney's quest to buy most of fox. disney does not like to share.

    3. Re:Marvel movies done well, screwed own comics by steveha · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What you say could be true, but I think the SJW campaign is probably the biggest reason. It's not just Wolverine.

      X-23 is wearing Wolverine's old costume and going by the name "Wolverine" now. Tony Stark is gone, and a teenaged black girl is Iron Man now. (Her name is "IronHeart" but the comic book is still named Iron Man.). Thor is gone and a woman picked up the hammer (she was worthy). Spider-Man isn't gone but there is a second, Hispanic Spider-Man, plus comics where Gen Stacy became Spider-Gwen. They killed Captain America and had Falcon (a black guy) become the new Captain America. There's even a new Hulk, an Asian guy.

      In short, SJW Marvel seems to have had a policy of getting rid of the white male versions of their most popular characters, so they could swap in more diverse versions.

      There are two huge problems. One is little kids seeing the movies and wanting to buy comics featuring the same characters; none are for sale. They have been walling off their own comics, preventing new customers from becoming fans! The other is that they forgot that their core mission is to tell good stories and entertain their customers... none of this diversity stuff was in service to the story, in fact the stories have been very poor.

      There is a guy on YouTube whose channel name is "Diversity and Comics" and he has covered all this. He says that SJW Marvel has been hiring people based on who they are, not their experience making comics. The character of America Chavez is a lesbian female, and Marvel hired a lesbian female to write the comics. But she had no comics experience, and she has done a terrible job of writing comics that fans want to read.

      It seems clear that the corporate overlords are out of patience with SJW Marvel. The editor-in-chief was recently replaced, and all signs are that the new guy is going to axe the SJW campaign and try to give the fans what they want. The SJW usual suspects are melting down over this. A half-dozen comics with extremely poor sales were cancelled and the blog coverage was all about the impact this will have on diversity.

      If the new editor-in-chief can turn things around, 2018 could be a much better year for Marvel. Most of their problems were self-inflicted.

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    4. Re:Marvel movies done well, screwed own comics by willy_me · · Score: 1

      Marvel is focused on cutting out the middle man - those that sell comics. They want to make digital sales direct to a customer tablet. This way they can offer attractive prices and leverage one comic to advertise another. For this they have attractive mobile applications that works quite well. While developing this comic distribution system it is inevitable that the physical comic sales will decline. It is not a sign that the comics are bad but a sign that they are moving to a different distribution channel. Just wait, next they will go after the theatres.

      Oh, and as far as Wolverine goes, the character was overused as is and it was time for a break. He'll be back, badass as ever...

    5. Re:Marvel movies done well, screwed own comics by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

      80% women (and climbing - as they force out more men).

      This reminds me of feminists complaining about silicon valley.

    6. Re:Marvel movies done well, screwed own comics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that sounds very "disney". DRM'd digital comics that cannot be resold or lent to others instead of collectable physical items that can be repeatedly sold and can appreciate in value.

    7. Re:Marvel movies done well, screwed own comics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's almost like you are just mindlessly making a "NO U" post.

      Couldn't be. Not on Slashdot.

    8. Re:Marvel movies done well, screwed own comics by thoughtlover · · Score: 1

      The biggest is that continuing their disagreement with Fox, where Fox still has the rights to X-Men movie franchises

      Don't even get me started about the Fantastic Four and the Sony contract. At least X-men fans got a ton of great movies! The Fantastic Four is the runt-that-can't of comic book movies...every incarnation, an utter failure... and every one should have been thrown in the nearest tar pit.

      --
      No sig for you! Come back one year!
    9. Re:Marvel movies done well, screwed own comics by Rande · · Score: 1

      Tried it. Western comics suck on a tablet with all the required scrolling.
      Manga is just about tolerable as most pages are readable without scrolling or zooming.

    10. Re:Marvel movies done well, screwed own comics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who is in the first, and most popular, Avengers movie? Do they have comics for sale right now, or have they been replaced?

      Using Wikipedia to see if they have comics: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_current_Marvel_Comics_publications

      Hulk: No Bruce Banner Hulk comic. She-Hulk has a comic, and the new Korean characters of Amadeus Cho, the "Totally Awesome Hulk", has a comic.

      Captain America: In 2014, he was replaced by Sam Wilson (The Falcon) who is African-American, but in a later storyline a returned-from-the-dead Steve Rogers became Captain America again. In a controversial recent storyline, Captain America became a loyal agent of Hydra. Fans objected and in the resolution of the storyline Cap was reverted to his anti-Hydra self. TL;DR Cap is still around as a white male with his own comic book but there have been SJW shenanigans.

      Iron Man: No Tony Stark Iron Man comic. A teenage African-American girl is the star of Invincible Iron Man, the current Iron Man comic. Seems pretty SJW. There is also Infamous Iron Man where Victor von Doom (aka Doctor Doom) has adopted the identity of Iron Man; that seems non-SJW as von Doom is a white man.

      Thor: No white male Thor comic. Nick Fury whispered something to Thor and he immediately became unable to lift Mjolnir (i.e. he was no longer worthy). A mysterious woman picked up Mjolnir, became the new God of Thunder, and started calling herself Thor. Thor started calling himself "Odinson" and fully supported the new lady Thor. Pure SJW.

      Black Widow: does not have her own comic, but she is female anyway so if she did presumably the SJWs wouldn't want to mess with it.

      Hawkeye: There is a Hawkeye comic! He shares his comic with a co-star, Kate Beaton, who for a while had her own comic under the name of Hawkeye. I haven't read these comics but from the summaries I have read, this may actually be story-driven and not simply flushing the white male version to make room for a woman version of the character. However, Hawkeye also stars in a second comic, Occupy Avengers which is appears to be pure SJW: he travels around America to help lead an "Occupy Wall Street" like movement to help the underprivileged.

      The Avengers as a comic: still around, with an ever-shifting lineup. But for a while Marvel tried selling another Avengers comic called All-New All-Different Avengers where the team is made up of minorities and/or women. (Nova is a young white male, Vision is a synthetic being, and everyone else is either female or a minority or both.)

      Every one of these characters has been affected by the SJW trend at Marvel. Only two of them have comics at this time... and one of those was replaced by a minority for a while. 100% SJW, nearly 100% replacement.

    11. Re:Marvel movies done well, screwed own comics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hawkeye's co-star is Kate Bishop, not "Beaton". Sorry for the mistake.

  7. their movies suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So it's a good thing if they can end that nonsense soon

  8. Re:Why is a tech site... by JoshuaZ · · Score: 2

    Classically, Slashdot has "News for nerds, stuff that matters"- this seems to be in the first category. One could argue that based on the classic word cloud associations this is closer to "geek" than "nerd" https://slackprop.wordpress.com/2013/06/03/on-geek-versus-nerd/, but the overlap between those two has always been pretty high.

  9. Re:Why is a tech site... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You must be new here.

  10. well ... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

    Indeed, Marvel has just canceled the Guardians of the Galaxy comic book series.

    Well, to be fair, the new movie kinda sucked balls. It's as if the director said "let's refilm the first movie, but simplify the plot, add more explosions, and make all the acting reminiscent of a middle school play".

    I wouldn't have expected it to drum up comic book sales.

    1. Re:well ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, Marvel has just canceled the Guardians of the Galaxy comic book series.

      Well, to be fair, the new movie kinda sucked balls. It's as if the director said "let's refilm the first movie, but simplify the plot, add more explosions, and make all the acting reminiscent of a middle school play".

      I wouldn't have expected it to drum up comic book sales.

      For the time-shifted DVR addicts who can't even sit through a 60-second YouTube commercial, I'm shocked that a 2-hour movie is still a viable form of entertainment for the Vine generation. Comic book sales will get a boost when Siri or Alexa can recite them.

    2. Re:well ... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I was amazed at how surreal that movie was. The basic plot outline was OK. The sound and visual effects excellent. The acting wasn't bad. But the whole thing felt like no one was taking anything terribly seriously, all the way out to the credits. It was like they were a comedy troop or something, or like the actors themselves didn't even enter the suspension of disbelief. All that was missing were overt breakages of the 4th wall. Very strange way to spend hundreds of millions of dollars.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    3. Re:well ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that's what you get when Deadpool is the highest grosing R-rated film of all-time and everyone learns the wrong lessons.

  11. Need more Independents by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    The corporatization of comics along with the yearly "big event" (bigger than the year before) in which heros, die, are reborn, lose powers (and maybe limbs), gain powers (and maybe limbs), are transported to alternative realms and the Earth, humanity or the universe is fundamentally changed in some way. These big events seem to be set up simply for having a movie that people can look forwards to down the line. Over the past 15 years or so, there's been a real loss of character driven stories and arcs which are what made comics great in the first place. I know Disney/Warner won't give up Marvel/DC as they drive movie and TV profits which means that they drive the comics to create properties/stories for these mediums.

    So, where are the great independents that can drive stories away from the corporate oligarchs? There really needs to be some new life/blood brought in.

    1. Re:Need more Independents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Judge Dredd is probably the most famous, long-running comic book hero who has an independent publisher.

    2. Re:Need more Independents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For more independent, try Image Comics, I think they are now third to DC and Marvel. No shared universe across the titles, all the titles are their own worlds.

  12. Not appalling to me by sanf780 · · Score: 1
    As stated on the first link, IDW is doing a better job at getting artist driven comics out. The appalling thing of artist driven comics is that they can start a new story from scratch, sometimes being fresh. DC and Marvel comics are hard to get involved in them when they need to cater for both long standing fans and drive new fans into it. It is a difficult mix. As a comparison, just imagine trying to get into "Lost" at the fourth season, and not knowing there are going to be even six seasons. There are just too many things going on at that stage that require you to invest time (and money) for digging up. The initial investment is hardly appalling.

    I am buying just two series these days : Berserk (follower since 2001) and Saga. I find manga usually easier to follow. I also like how Saga is delivered in thick hardcover versions months or years after the issues are printed.

  13. Re:Why is a tech site... by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 0

    The real question you should be asking is whether or not it's an improvement over the parade of SJW flamebait stories over the last week or so.

    Spoiler alert: it isn't, and I'd wager not very many people are too stupid to tell.

  14. Just a data point. by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

    Of course this is just a data point, but it goes with the general trend.

    Kids are getting exposed to comic characters but not that interested in the comics themselves.

    My kids were exposed to comic books at a young age. They're 11 and 14 now and love the trade paperbacks (but are not at all interested in getting individual issues).

    Their friends, for the most part, just like the movies and TV shows and aren't at all interested in the back stories from the comics.

    My personal take on DC beating Marvel this year: DC's previous reboot failed so miserably that there was a pent up demand for something readable in the DC universe. DC Rebirth fits the bill so more DC purchases this year.

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
  15. Wut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There'll be no loss if these two both went underwater for good.

  16. People got smart by magusxxx · · Score: 1

    Why buy the individual issues when they're just going to come out with a trade paperback?

    --
    Care killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.
  17. Something is amiss between movies/comic sales by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I remember back when I was a kid, that I got into comics because of Star Wars, and bought a lot of Star Wars comics.

    Even more recently after watching Firefly, first the TV series then the movie, I was really happy to find the related comics.

    That's why to me it's such a surprise the very popular movies are not driving comic book sales, at all, to the point where (as mentioned and a surprise to me) they are cancelling Guardians of the Galaxy comics!

    Now i have to admit, it's not like I sought out Marvel comics even after watching a lot of their properties on file and TV. But it seems like there could have been some draw from the movies back to comics, if they had tied them in better, maybe short series setting up things in the movie, or based around the aftermath of events in the movie. Maybe they did do that and I never knew...

    On a side note, can you not totally see those all gold people in Guardians of the Galaxy 2 being a perfect fit with a full-page comic Hostess Twinkie advertisement? Just seems like a natural fit somehow.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Something is amiss between movies/comic sales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither DC or Marvel really has capitalized on the movies. Their books never match up release wise with the films or provide points for movie fans to quickly get on board. At least DC could point to Rebirth as a jumping on point.
      Marvel also really hurt themselves in converting movie and tv fans to the comics when they did the whole All New All Different thing. People went into the store and were confused as Hulk as an asian kid, Thor is woman, Spider-Man may or may not be Peter Parker, Hawkeye was now a girl (Kate is an awesome character and I'll miss her book), Iron Man was now either a black girl or Doctor Doom, Rhody is dead, The Falcon was Captain America then Steve Rogers was a Nazi and now there are 2 Steves, Wolverine was Dead and Old or maybe a Woman (Laura I like, Gabby is great, but heir book is a little weak), Ice man is gay and a kid and an adult, Cyclops is dead and a kid, same with Jean Grey, and more changes and stuff that nowhere reflect the films or shows. There were in world reasons for all this, but for new and casual fans the bulk of the Marvel line were unrecognizable.

  18. Re:They all pale compared to Uncle Scrooge by shoor · · Score: 2

    Carl Barks (aka "The Good Artist") https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Barks created Uncle Scrooge and both drew and wrote the Uncle Scrooge and Donald Duck comics back in the 50s and they were the BEST comix around. Whenever I take a glance at the modern 'action hero' comics, I find the stories pretentious, repetitive and rather stupid and uninformed, and the characters one dimensional, compared to the old Uncle Scrooge and Donald Duck stories. Uncle Scrooge with his money, Donald Duck with his sheer toughness, and Huey, Dewey, and Louie with their Junior Woodchucks' handbook could take on anybody. Oh, and then there was Gyro Gearloose...

    --
    In theory, theory and practice are the same; in practice they're different. (Yogi Berra & A. Einstein)
  19. Thank god by ArchieBunker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So tired of a new comic book movie every fucking month.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:Thank god by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      So long as they keep making money, the studios will keep making them. If enough people feel as you do, the studios will move on to something else.

      I feel the same way about vampire/supernatural hunter shows on TV. The number of these shows is incredible in this post-Buffy age, but the quality, at least of the ones I've seen, is pretty appalling. And yet the genre has a huge number of viewers, so as long as people are willing to tune in in the numbers they do, these shows will continue to propagate.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  20. Stories should maximize profits by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 1

    The stories should reflect society as it is today. White men controlling everything is so 1950's.

    The stories should maximize profit.

    Tangentially, if the stories are riveting and artistically interesting or win awards for things (such as artwork or plot or character development), that will cause greater sales and thus greater profits.

    Female Thor and black female Iron Man - those were seemingly *not* chosen to maximize profit.

    ...and now people are noting that profits due to those choices are down.

    This comes as a surprise?

    1. Re:Stories should maximize profits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people paying these bills don't care about profit, they bought all these media outlets for propaganda. You'll read about Marvel profits down, this and that newspaper, this and that magazine, but all will keep being made. Even the successes that have marxist nonsense in them are but a shadow of the success they would have if they weren't divisive garbage. This isn't about profit, it's about control.

  21. No way by Kohath · · Score: 5, Interesting

    -Who doesn't enjoy preachy fiction stories?
    -Why wouldn't a story written to fill diversity quotas be as compelling as a story written to entertain?
    -Don't comic book readers want to worship the latest designated victim class members?
    -Why doesn't the regular comic book audience appreciate the new characters adaptations that are meant to appeal to a new, completely different audience who have never been much into comic books?

    It sure is a mystery what's going on.

    1. Re:No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -Who doesn't enjoy preachy fiction stories?

      Did you ever watch the old G.I.I Joe cartoon (amongst others)?? ;-)

    2. Re:No way by Kohath · · Score: 2

      -Who doesn't enjoy preachy fiction stories?

      Did you ever watch the old G.I.I Joe cartoon (amongst others)?? ;-)

      Lots of boys want to grow up to be a tough good-guy soldier dude. Not as many want to grow up to be a woman, or a diversity priest, or a social justice warrior.

    3. Re:No way by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

      I think captain planet was pretty popular with kids too.

    4. Re:No way by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      To be fair though, no one wanted to be Ma-Ti with the power of Heart when they grew up.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re: No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A tough guy unable to aim properly and concerned about the environment or the power of friendship!

    6. Re:No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one is allowed to say it because it's illegal to say anything about it but it's always Jews that are pushing this anti-white propaganda and genocide campaigns to make it very clear that white people are bad and diversity, feminism, birth control and mass immigration are Good; and removing your genitals and not having kids is good, and anti-white safe spaces where all the other races can safely organize against the evil white man are good, but white people are all Nazis and must be silenced and stopped through a violent antifa uprising.

    7. Re:No way by DeVilla · · Score: 1

      I think captain planet was pretty popular with kids too.

      Really? That's an honest question. In the States or elsewhere in the world? I remember that show as being everyone's punch line. I can't remember anyone who didn't roll their eyes at that one.

      The only reason I suspect you might be serious is you seem to remember a character's name and can relate it to a power. I really know no one who ever spoke of that show as anything but a blatant "tree hugger" sermon. Even among friend we were environmentally conscious/active.

    8. Re:No way by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

      In Israel it was just this cool show about kids with superpowers fighting polluters, which were classic villains at the time. Israeli politics is quite diferent from US politics, so as long as these guys are not saying we should accept arabs or talk about Israel or jewism or against conscription, all of us can just quietly can consider them as unpolitical as the thunder cats or any other superhero group.

  22. Re:Why is a tech site... by Kohath · · Score: 0

    If they were still for boys they might not be in decline.

  23. Try humanoids.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Batman, Superman, and Spiderman are so 20th century. Try humanoids.com for some fresh air.

  24. Re: They all pale in comparison to SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What drugs are you doing today Sparky? Alex Jones calles he wants his pipe back

  25. Comics core audience is teenage boys by sandbagger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Pandering to a non existent market by destroying your core characters by replacing them with well intentioned morally improving replacements is not the solution.

    --
    ---- The above post was generated by the Turing Institute. Maybe.
  26. Watch Diversity & Comics youtube channel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Marvel was hijacked by a group of SJW types that nearly destroyed Marvel a few years ago. Marvel already had a lot of diversity before this but the SJW writers decided that they wanted to purge all of the white male heterosexuals from their customer base. I'm not exaggerating or being dishonest about that statement. They literally were openly attacking 95% of their customers and started catering exclusively to trans, gays and oppressed "minorities." Naturally, calling a bunch of left leaning nerds a bunch of "alt-right nazis" is a great way to ruin your sales. Nerds went to DC and now Disney just noticed this mess. So now Disney is purging the SJW out of Marvel.

  27. 90s X-Men cartoon series... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Had Wolverine both dead and not-dead for the entire series.

    The future guys who occasionally travelled back had wolverines adamantium skeleton kept in a jar while in the past he was kicking ass and taking names while getting his bromance on with Sabertooth periodically.

  28. Don't piss off your market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Marvel put out a bunch of titles slanted towards social justice. And mucked with long-treasured characters in less than welcome ways.

    If you can pull that off well, it might work. But they didn't.

    Confusing and less than wonderful storytelling didn't help either.

    So the comic-buying public has moved away, or moved to the Distinguished Competition.

    Comics is a business. Produce good characters, good art, and good storylines that your potential buyers want to buy. Do otherwise, and don't surprised if you fail.

  29. Go read the DC Snagglepuss and see why by Khyber · · Score: 2

    You heard me, go read fucking Snagglepuss. This is why DC is kicking Marvel in the dick on sales.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:Go read the DC Snagglepuss and see why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      go read fucking Snagglepuss

      DC is publishing a comic centered on Hanna-Barbera's Snagglepuss? Seriously? What next, Quick-draw McGraw helps Superman take down a Lex Luthor/Dick Dastardly teamup? Captain Caveman and the Teen Angels tangle with House of Mystery? Wacky Races featuring Lobo with guest appearances by Batman and the many varied Batmobiles?

      >z
      Time passes.

      OMG, you're not making it up. DC is publishing a Snagglepuss comic.

      Dibs on a series featuring the Scooby gang mixing it up with Cain and Abel.

  30. gay batman with his 'boy' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i'm sure inspiration for batman in his tight clothes with his 'boy' , masked and all, came straight from the gay-bdsm scene

  31. Re: They all pale compared to Uncle Scrooge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Yes, the duck comics were some pretty original stuff (and inspired the Indiana Jones films.)

    But one of the benefits of mundane reboots in modern comics is they recontextualize the plot in a modern social context.

    Like the Ducktales reboot is unnecessary, but without it, people will forget about the comics entirely. What has happened in the last 10 years is the introduction of social media where the previous decade introduced the Internet and prior to that computers.

    So it's not comics fault that technology decided to leapfrog itself, but since 9/11 pretty much the fun and adventure has been sucked out both marvel and DC's comics, leaving only dues-ex-militarization stories that are not inspiring and more about creating screenplays for shallow films.

  32. I get the value of diversity but... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Young females don't apparently buy comic books in large numbers.

    And apparently minorities don't buy comic books in large numbers.

    It is reasonable to say, "Well all the stars are white male so why would women and minorities buy the comics?" but shifting the focus drove away existing customers and hasn't resulted in enough extra sales to women and minorities.

    That being said- the reasons I stopped buying comic books had to do with price and dystopic topics. When I was a kid they were a cheap product that cost the same as a Hershey almond bar or a bottle of coke at the convenience store.

    Today, they are double to triple the price. Really, two comic books which I could read in 20 minutes cost as much as a book which will take hours to read. Comic books production values are too high for the child audience so children never pick up the habit.

    Second- I was an iron man fan-- until the 5th or 7th time he fell off the wagon. I don't read comic book stories to feel unending misery for literally *years*. I want to be happy, inspired, surprised for my money.

    On a minor note, I do not like it when they rebrand an existing I.P. When they take Thor and make it someone else, I have no interest in the story. Make a new hero- don't step on my childhood I.P.

    I have the same issue with The Last Jedi. Make a *new* movie with new characters if you want to make a dystopic piece of crap in a "no win" universe. Don't ruin my childhood I.P. or I will stop giving you my money.

    (and on that note: TLJ box office is down by over 50% per day compared to TFA- no one wants to see it twice- and fewer want to see it even once because its such a nasty, toxic piece of work. For bonus points- merchansiding orders are down 47% too. That's going to get Disney's attention- I hope they fired Kennedy and put someone who l actually likes the films and characters like the executive producer over the MCU).

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  33. Spider Gwen is pretty popular by rsilvergun · · Score: 0

    as such things go. And you'll find plenty of SJW stuff in DC. I suspect it's more to do with the movie universe making it's way into the comics and turning off the more hardcore, which are generally the only ones that buy more than an issue or two or maybe a graphic novel when a new movie comes out.

    By the way, I know this is an intensely unpopular opinion but am I the only one that finds it odd that social justice is a bad word? Yeah, yeah, the crazy feminist who runs your local community college's woman's studies program is pretty annoying, amiright? But then you've got Harvey Weinstein. And Philando Castile. And Flint, Mi. And Puerto Rico. And hell America's entire for profit health insurance industry. There's too many examples of injustice to list. It feels like we're letting the chick who runs the CC's woman's study distract us from real problems. And I'm left wondering if somebody isn't using SJW backlash to engineer that...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Spider Gwen is pretty popular by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2, Informative

      as such things go. And you'll find plenty of SJW stuff in DC. I suspect it's more to do with the movie universe making it's way into the comics and turning off the more hardcore, which are generally the only ones that buy more than an issue or two or maybe a graphic novel when a new movie comes out.

      There was a movie meme trend in recent years of the cute, tiny woman who gains super powers somehow, and goes off on a spree of killing men.

      By the way, I know this is an intensely unpopular opinion but am I the only one that finds it odd that social justice is a bad word?

      Actual social justice should ab a lofty goal. But the warriors are not necessarily about justice. Often it is revenge, or just another form of hate.

      Yeah, yeah, the crazy feminist who runs your local community college's woman's studies program is pretty annoying, amiright? But then you've got Harvey Weinstein.

      Ah, just the right place to start. Instead of properly attacking the problem of creepy fucks like Weinstein, the crazy feminists you speak of go the #metoo route. Which is making more problems than it fixes. A world where due process is thrown out with the pursuit of justice isn't going to be quite like most women want.

      What young women shold be taught to do is turn the guy in immediately after he harasses you. And a much better defined version of what harassment consists of would be a big help. And she needs to understand that by not turning the guy in, she is enabling him to harass more women. The same can go fro men harassed by women. Yes it happens.

      Instead, we have now entered a brave new world where men, as the target, are taking measures to protect themselves from claims of harassment. Measures as having a chaperone present to avoid any one on one meetings with women. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/1... https://www.theatlantic.com/po... And some are trying to make this illegal! I kinda doubt that will work. Besides, who could object to having a chaperone for both parties protection?

      Have you seen NBC's new gender interaction rules? No shared taxis. You will be fired if you do not report anything that you might consider sexual harassment, You will be fired if you do not report a suspected romance between employees. Any interaction between opposite sexes must be reported to Human Resources. And taking a vegan to a steak house is expressly forbidden. Aapparently some vegan was pissed because of a party at - you guessed it - a Steak House. There are very specific rules if you were to hug a person. Quick, and step away to avoid bodily contact. Seriously - I wonder if they have to have a reservation to hug, and a person with a stopwatch to time it? This is the new workplace, because in a world where an accusation from 20 years ago is sufficient evidence to destroy your career, it means that there is no due process, which means none is needed when she sues the company. So in that light, the rules make perfect sense. Google NBC's sexual harassment rules. And the problem is most women and men simply hate this - who wouldn't? But if you listen to the "Crazy feminist" who rather obviouly is a misandryst you'll end up with these sorts of rules as we abandon due process and the rule of law in order to protect women from all men. Most men and women can get along with each other. But in this brave new world, one cannnot be too careful lest they lose everything. I had this happen to me when I simply predicted what was goint to happen with the #metoo witch hunt.

      There's too many examples of injustice to list. It feels like we're letting the chick

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    2. Re:Spider Gwen is pretty popular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > But then you've got Harvey Weinstein. And Philando Castile. And Flint, Mi. And Puerto Rico. And hell America's entire for profit health insurance industry. There's too many examples of injustice to list. It feels like we're letting the chick who runs the CC's woman's study distract us from real problems.

      Like corporations trying to replace American workers with cheap foreign labor.

      Corporations are evil so you have my back on this, right? Right?

    3. Re: Spider Gwen is pretty popular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >get out and vote

      We did, thatâ(TM)s why Trump is president. Weinstein wasnâ(TM)t pictured bundling money for the GOP, heâ(TM)s pictured with Hillary (and her handler, Huma Abedin) on numerous occasions. Meryl Streep called him âa godâ(TM).

    4. Re:Spider Gwen is pretty popular by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Yeah, yeah, the crazy feminist who runs your local community college's woman's studies program is pretty annoying, amiright? But then you've got Harvey Weinstein.

      Ah, just the right place to start. Instead of properly attacking the problem of creepy fucks like Weinstein, the crazy feminists you speak of go the #metoo route. Which is making more problems than it fixes. A world where due process is thrown out with the pursuit of justice isn't going to be quite like most women want.

      To be perfectly honest, it seems more like those "male feminist allies" are the problem, and since they can't compete any other way they're using the ally path as a means of reproduction. It's not dissimilar to the anti-gamergaters, who turn out to be committing sexual assault, rape, and calling in bomb threats. Projection all the fucking way down. In a year or two, it won't surprise me if this becomes similar to the "anti-gay firebrand" who ends up being caught engaging in the exact stuff that they were railing against.

      And let me say, watch the video. Watch it. Sure it's 30 minutes long, but every single one of the people promoted themselves as "male feminist allies" every single one, and went out of their way to attack anyone else who dared to question the feminist talking points or narrative. Just like those anti-gay firebrands.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    5. Re:Spider Gwen is pretty popular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And taking a vegan to a steak house is expressly forbidden. Aapparently some vegan was pissed because of a party at - you guessed it - a Steak House.

      I'd actually be pretty pissed if it was a work thing that's supposed to be fun for everyone and it isn't because some limp-dicked cuck thinks it's somehow virile to boast about loving to murder pigs and cows and drink their blood.... the world needs to grow the fuck up.

    6. Re:Spider Gwen is pretty popular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... it won't surprise me if this becomes similar to the "anti-gay firebrand" who ends up being caught engaging in the exact stuff that they were railing against.

      You mean like Whedon?

    7. Re:Spider Gwen is pretty popular by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      To be perfectly honest, it seems more like those "male feminist allies" are the problem, and since they can't compete any other way they're using the ally path as a means of reproduction.

      Now there is a coincidence. I just watched Sargon's video last night. Its a tough slog to get through, but I think he made it that way as an object lesson. Name after name after name - crime after crime after crime. There sure seems to be a correlation between abusing women and the white knights that presumably are male feminists.

      Projection all the fucking way down. In a year or two, it won't surprise me if this becomes similar to the "anti-gay firebrand" who ends up being caught engaging in the exact stuff that they were railing against.

      Projection isn't that hard to find. Any zealot is of interest. Then if you get into a discussion with them, you're treated to an accusation that somehow some way, you support rape and abuse of women. I've seen that a lot in here. Somehow noting that men will take measures to protect themselves in the workplace becomes misogyny, and supporting men harassing and raping women.

      Meantime, I would caution against assigning one thing as the problem. The male feminists and their oftentimes using that status as a way to gain the trust of women, and then abuse them is one problem, but the third wave feminists are also a huge part of the problem. They have been involved in teaching women that all men are the problem, and that women cannot protect themselves, so society and the elimination of due process and the statute of limitations must protect the defenseless women from all men.

      And here we are.

      Men who are of no danger to women are pulling away from women they work with. A simple risk/reward asessment tells him that even with the utmost of care, it is possible to say something that might be misinterpreted, or to accidentally touch a woman, or to take a normal act of consolation or friendship be determined to be a sexual act. So yeah, he's going to get off the elevator if she gets on it, so yeah, he's not going to meet with her alone. So yeah, anything that isn't directly involved with work is off limits, and yeah, if she's upset about something, he's just going to ignore her.

      And while some folks celebrate this great victory, to cop a phrase from Mrs Clinton, the real victims of the new workplace are nomal women.

      I would think it would be very upsetting to have a co-worker leave the room or elevator when you walked in to it, knowing that it was you who caused him to leave. It can't be too comfortble to have as little communications as possible with men who are weighing the impact and vetting everything they say for potential of offending you. Or demanding chaperones as witnesses in order to protect their career.

      NBC's draconian workplace anti-harassment rules are the way of the future. But even if they didn't adopt that insanity, men would still be treading very carefully.

      But again, while thos rules being genderless, and therefore equal, once again, there's a hidden victim. Women often use the workplace as a convenient way to vet suitable men. It makes a certain amount of sense, as you can spend time around men, and can judge whether they are assholes or not. You know they are going to be of a particular education level, how they act, and can make sound judgements. That is gone in the workplace of the 21st century.

      And let me say, watch the video. Watch it. Sure it's 30 minutes long, but every single one of the people promoted themselves as "male feminist allies" every single one, and went out of their way to attack anyone else who dared to question the feminist talking points or narrative. Just like those anti-gay firebrands.

      It really isn't too surprising - I know I've been attacked for some pretty tame disagreements. Usually just my typical shtick of being a Cassandra, where a

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    8. Re:Spider Gwen is pretty popular by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      And taking a vegan to a steak house is expressly forbidden. Aapparently some vegan was pissed because of a party at - you guessed it - a Steak House.

      I'd actually be pretty pissed if it was a work thing that's supposed to be fun for everyone and it isn't because some limp-dicked cuck thinks it's somehow virile to boast about loving to murder pigs and cows and drink their blood.... the world needs to grow the fuck up.

      Because it's all about you, You YOU!

      While you bask in self orbiting snowflakeness, There is always a way to avoid much butthurt. If the venue is not appropriate for your tender sensibilities - don't go. I've simply avoided going to places I didn't like for some reason or another. And I'm sure as hell not going to demand that no one els go there.

      But it isn't terribly surprising that a vegan would demand to have veto power over everyone else's choice.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    9. Re:Spider Gwen is pretty popular by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      That's a good reply and I agree with a lot of it. But really it's going to be a far deeper shitpile that we go through before any sense of normalcy and reason comes back into this. That is providing society doens't come crashing down around our ears first.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    10. Re:Spider Gwen is pretty popular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real issue is that most purported feminists being given air time nowadays aren't feminists per-se, but in fact female supremacists.

      And like all extremists they represent a small, but hard to avoid fringe, and like white supremacists are more than capable of inciting race war, and islamic extremists inciting religious war, they're more than capable of inciting gender war.

      Which is really what's happening - let's not pretend that a large part of Trump's success despite being outed in the campaign as a flagrant sexual predator isn't down to the fact that men who would quite happily support and agree with moderate feminism, feminism that seeks the fair and valid goal of equality, rather than supremacy were turned off by the whole argument.

      It puts liberal centrists like me in a rather awkward place, because I completely agree with the goals of feminism - the idea of gender equality is absolutely fine with me, and I'm happy to support it. It's difficult for me to do that though when female supremacists are sharing articles from the likes of Jezebel claiming for example that all white males, including myself, are responsible for all rapes. Frankly, being put into the same category as someone like Harvey Weinstein whom I think deserves nothing less than a slow painful death with fire simply because I'm white and male is exactly the kind of bigotry I'm thoroughly against. I don't care who the target of the bigotry is, white, black, gay, straight, male female, it's wrong, and there's no place for it in a society that values human advancement (rather than regression to neanderthal-like thinking).

      This is why liberals are losing the argument - because extremists that have hijacked liberal causes such as the aformentioned female supremacists are doing what extremists do best, and sowing division. By definition female supremacists are NOT liberals, as bigotry is an afront to everything liberalism stands for, and until people start calling that out and lumping them with islamist extremists, white supremacists, and all the other bottom feeding scum then we're going to be stuck dealing with whatever distasteful populist manages to scrape together just enough people with the support of foreign actors like Russia who enjoy watching this division destroy our global clout both politically and economically.

    11. Re:Spider Gwen is pretty popular by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      The real issue is that most purported feminists being given air time nowadays aren't feminists per-se, but in fact female supremacists.

      And like all extremists they represent a small, but hard to avoid fringe, and like white supremacists are more than capable of inciting race war, and islamic extremists inciting religious war, they're more than capable of inciting gender war.

      And they have succeeded. It is a strange thing that government and adademia have not figured out that as you progress along an idelogical path the tendency is always to become a little more extreme. If a country becomes more conservative, even more conservative players pop up. The same with liberals.

      The confusion arises when ideologies start to pander to iether extremes. Because the extremes on both sides have a lot more in common than either side would admit. And are never sustainable. Todays version of feminists are as you suggest, female supremacists. Unfortunately, they have a lot of power in the media and even politics and the courts. And apparantly in pop culture and those comic books.

      And I concur, most men are not concerned about females being equal. But in a world of #metoo, in a world where there is no such thibng as due process. And where people actually throw away the entiure underpinnings of civilization, and substitute the rule of the mob for law and order, because of the gender of the accuser.

      Well, these people are more aligned with the collapse of society than anything else.

      I look at supporters of #metoo as teh exact equivalent of people who enjoy lynching African Americans. Because thety are doing to exact same thing. The accusation is enough for whatever destruction is meted out. These are all bigots through and through, and the only difference is that they are bigoted about.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    12. Re:Spider Gwen is pretty popular by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      I can't think of a single steak house that allows - let alone encourages - you to drink an animal's blood. Now sure, it's kind of a dick move to bring a vegan to a steakhouse if it's supposed to be for everyone (assuming you knew they're a vegan).

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
  34. In a declining superhero comics ... by Qbertino · · Score: 2

    ... market USians still think "superhero comics" == "comics".

    Meanwhile European, Franco-Belgian and Japanese comics still make up 95% of the total of all comics and are still doing perfectly fine.

    There, FTFY.

    In other news:

    "Are marvel and DC fans finally discovering how shitty, bland, boring, overpriced and repetitive their favorite comics are?"

    "DC comic readers head explodes from overload after catching glimpse of Franco-Belgian hardcover by Vance & van Hamme"

    "Marvel enthusiast dies of heart attack and endorphine overdose after repeatedly masturbating to French Milo Manara album."

    "US Superhero fan sells all belongings, moves to southern Europe after enchanting read of Coseys "A trip to Italy" comic"

    "Euro comic shipment arrives at US borders. Marvel & DC stock plummets."

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  35. What've people been telling Marvel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yeah, those fucking lazy pervs, man-haters and potential suicide bombers in the Social Justice/Gender Pronoun/Feminism/ReligionOfPeace movements are really good at bringing social pressure and demanding change. They're good at proposing shitty ideas for deranging your current product lineups. And they'll beat on you long enough that, eventually, it might ALMOST sounds like a not-totally-bad idea!

    And hey! You might break open a new market!

    You know what they're all NOT good at?

    BUYING COMIC BOOKS!

    Sure, once you cave, they MIGHT, maybe, buy the first issue, maybe two. And then, mission accomplished (to make you kowtow to their ideology), they vanish.
    Unless they've wormed their way into authority positions in your organization, then you're TOTALLY fucked and your business is doomed to crash and burn because of their myopic "vision".

    Marvel has been told this, repeatedly.
    Hell, they even ADMITTED IT.
    Yet they're caught in the claws of The Monster now. And it's going to ride the corpse all the way down.
    Decades and decades of labor and creativity. Flushed down the drain while they hold SHIT pressed to their bossoms.

    It's sad. But not sad enough to actually make me give them my hard earned money.

    1. Re:What've people been telling Marvel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless they've wormed their way into authority positions in your organization, then you're TOTALLY fucked and your business is doomed to crash and burn because of their myopic "vision".

      Don't worry, there are Chinese billionaires who are happy to buy your devalued company after the Maoists have chased away all of your customers. What a coincidence that is.

  36. *ugh!* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can these people please leave their comic book garbage for actual comic books?

    Even since CG's been cheap enough to use all over the place in movies, we pretty much got a never-ending stream of comic book-based movies and very little else. Personally, I already had my fill after about 3 of these so-called blockbusters. I haven't had a reason to go see more than one movie a year in theaters (if that) in nearly 2 decades.

    I guess I'm a little late to start complaining about this?

  37. Probably because of Marvel Unlimited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'nuff said.

  38. Because in 10-20 years white males by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Interesting

    will be a minority. If they haven't built up a fan base by then they're toast. These are large companies, they need to think long term.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  39. Marvel got turned out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now we're burned out on the movies and TV series. DC seems fresh by comparison.

    1. Re:Marvel got turned out by yuriklastalov · · Score: 1

      Except DC's #metoo cinematic universe is garbage, the movies have largely been trash and the likelihood that the rest of the big DC movies are going to be dumpster fires, as well.

      Or were you trying to insinuate that Suicide Squad was going to save the comic book movie?

    2. Re:Marvel got turned out by Rande · · Score: 1

      No, but the Suicide Squad movie made me pick up the Harley Quinn comics. While series 2 isn't as good as the first one, I'm still buying them.

  40. HULK BROKE! by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    Part of the problem might be that there are about a million titles these days, and product fatigue is probably an issue. How many books do I have to read to keep up with whatever wolverine and spider-man are doing each month? Back in the 80's it would have been about 3. In addition, there a huge number of independent titles and publishers getting in on the game, so there is more competition for readers than ever.

    On top of that, re-writing all the classic heroes to be more ethnically and gender diverse is kinda lame. Don't make the Hulk Asian and Ms. Marvel Moslem, just keep them they way they were, and create new characters and give them their own books. If they are well written, they will sell. If they don't sell, at least you haven't fucked up your classic characters.

    Modern comics aren't cheap either. Back in the golden age of comics they were printed cheaply on flimsy newsprint and cranked out in en mass so they were pretty affordable. Over the years we got to the point that they are printed on super high quality paper and bound in book format, but when publishing shifted to digital format, I am not sure that there was any price drop to reflect the efficiency in moving to non-physical distribution.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:HULK BROKE! by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      You can replace a character with a different version and have it work. DC did so repeatedly with Green Lantern and despite the fact that they ended up with multiple Green Lanterns at the same time it seems to work well. The various iterations of Blue Beetle are another example (although BB is a lower-tier character than GL, of course). You do need to be very careful about doing this with A-listers but it can work if done right and in good measure.

      The main problem is that Marvel hasn't been careful at all; it seems that they replaced their entire A-list roster in a short period of time. (Spider-Man just got more alternate versions of various characters, as is tradition.)

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  41. Because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why read a comic book when you can watch 47 comic movies per year, as the current rate see.s to be?

  42. pretty meaningless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, a declaration, been reading comics since I was old enough to read, over 40 years and in general I have always preferred DC over Marvel myself, but also enjoy ones from all publishers, big name and not. I just happen to be a person that prefers the pure escapism that DC promotes more than the more "realistic" world that Marvel presents.

    That being said, this article is flawed. It says that the data is only about issues ordered by comic shops. E-comics are a big part of the pie now though and especially now with a number of all-you-can-read options available, the actual readership of titles could be completely different than what these numbers say.

  43. Re: They all pale compared to Uncle Scrooge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the Ducktales reboot is unnecessary, but without it, people will forget about the comics entirely

    If that were true, then why doesn't everything get a reboot (eg, 1984, To Kill a Mockingbird, The Bible, etc)? Further, what is wrong with "forgetting" something from a previous generation?

  44. Duh... Forced vomit diversity doesn't sell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, we don't want a female Thor. Hopefully DC learns from Marvel's massive failure that forcing some garbage preaching SJW mottos at us equals failure.

  45. The real problem by slashmydots · · Score: 2

    Here's the TD;DR version of Marvel in the last few years. They let SJWs take over to look progressive and all the customers left.

  46. The elephant in the room by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not the first time this has happened. Marvel hasn't always been #1, and floppies don't move the way they used to. Marvel did okay in 2017, all things considered.

    The single biggest contributing factor this time, in my opinion, was the harassment movement on Youtube drove away new Marvel fans by the truckload while actively promoting DC titles.Twitter only compounded the problem. This situation has nothing to do with marketing as we know it. It has nothing to do with pissing off your audience, or even the content of the books.

    Instead, what you see is DC creators signing on to and colluding with harassment and hate speech campaigns designed to make the conversation around Marvel titles as toxic as possible. It's a very shrewd move on DC's part if it's premeditated.

    Using targeted harassment in this way is going to explode in their faces though. It's already driving sales across the rest of the industry down. Only a matter of time before this hits DC hard.