If you are a patriot then you can't be a Trump fan.
Right, because being for legal immigration, gutting chain immigration, enforcing existing immigration laws is very anti-patriotic. And you probably still don't understand why Trump won, but think a raging racist that holds pro-segregation views and is the #2 in the DNC is the model of a patriot.
Not true in the least, Twitter has ethics of a sort. But those ethics only support a particular view point, and in this case Trump feeds the people who are screeching that "Trump's goin' down, really now, any time, RUSSSIA RUUUUUSSSSIIIIIIIAAAA!" If they were being truly ethical, they would have banned terrorist groups that use it, or banned black bloc and antifa members who openly supported, promoted, or engaged in violence. Instead you've got multiple cases where the people who were victimized by them were banned.
Just remember who their "trust and safety council" is, and it suddenly becomes very clear what form of ethics and viewpoint they're going with.
So in your view, political violence is purview of the left only.
Some amazing reading skills there. Where did I say that? Ah...right...that'd be nowhere.
As I noted above, I use these things in the actual sense they're used. Not in the way that extremists on either side use them. National socialists are distinctly on the right, just like communists are distinctly on the left.
No, you're looking for fascist on the right. National socialists are distinctly on the left, just like the FLQ were national socialists based around marxism. If you don't understand, then go read Plato's "The Republic" which should clear it up.
If you share the views of "national socialists" you're still in the left. The only difference between them and a communist is how best to put their boot on your throat.
Donald Trump threatens nuclear war on Twitter in order to distract from his obvious treason.
Trump threatens nuclear war...with words...which were mocking a tinpot dictator. That same dictator on the other hand who's country has kidnapped women from S.Korea and Japan and pressed them into harems for the military and senior officials of the government. That has fired missiles over Japan, and has Japan on edge enough that not only are they considering a full or partial rewrite of article 9 - that's the section that says they can't have a pro-active military, only self-defense. That they're also considering going nuclear as well, and people are supportive of it. But Trump's the problem...
Far left and far right as two sides of the same coin here. Most reasonable leftists on the other hand share the opinion of the reasonable right wingers. Let the man speak and let everyone make up their own mind what he says.
Quite true, though keep in mind just what the definition of "far right" is these days. If you support freedom of speech, hold a view that patriotism is okay, that political correctness has run amok? You're a far-right-nazi in the minds of those far leftists who are extremely loud, and in many cases hold institutional power in many places from media to education. That proof can be seen to the average Trump derangement syndrome, to the shitshow surrounding Lindsay Shepard at Wilfred Laurier. The "reasonable left" is far right in their minds, and has a lot to do with social media creating ideological echo chambers.
That's not a Trump problem, that's a media problem. More so that media are chasing that "always first" "always sweet-sweet ad revenue" and so on. Welcome to the shitshow that always-on 24hr news media has created, and welcome to the ever increasing irrelevance that the news media has helped create. It also doesn't help that there is very low public trust of the media in general, or that when people point out that they have indeed fucked up, engaged in unethical practices, or whatever else. The media's response is to screech "IT'S NOT US! IT'S YOU!" Queue this up with Journolist, Gamejournopros and so on all pushing narritives, talking points, and so on. Or media outlet's directly handing off their news stories to political parties to make sure that the "story narrative is correct."
Yeah and ignore that impact bit. Since it appears that it was a force nvidia driver update, that decided to install itself despite telling it never to update the driver. What a fucking shitshow on that one.
Seems like an unnecessary performance penalty to push on AMD users. Most likely down for simplicity/consistency on Microsoft's side for kernel code management.
Doesn't seem to have any impact at all on my AMD machine, though I'm seeing around a 5-13% drop in performance with my Intel machine. Both are running the current version of Win10, I'm sure there's going to be a lot of screeching on gaming forums later today when people suddenly start having serious performance issues, especially since Intel holds around 80-90% of the gaming marketshare according to steam. My development machine that's in slow ring right now hasn't seen a patch pushed out yet, probably won't for a few days as a guess. Though there's a lot of talk on the MS boards about it and "when" they're going to push one out.
No, it's directly relevant because their actions or inactions have caused problems that other people have to deal with. Obama shipping boatloads of cash and gold, and knowingly doing so with the explicit fact that it would be used to fund terrorism isn't "what-about-ism." It's something that everyone should be pissed off about, just like if you raged over Bush Jr., and the neocons going into Iraq. Or why Lybia's nuclear program is sitting in Tennessee and was handed over with the explicit guarantee that if they did hand it over, they'd leave him in power. Which of course worked out very well to this day, and Lybia hasn't collapsed to a near non-state.
And while on the neocon bit, democrats, liberals, progressives, whatever you want to call yourself. When republicans started driving them out, you know where they fled to? That's right you do, because the democrats playbook was straight out of it and is to this day. Which is why people like David Frum and ilk were welcomed with open arms by the democrat leadership.
Which means it is no longer science; instead, it's just buzzwords that trigger government bureaucrats into opening the subsidy faucet.
No it's far worse then that, it's not buzzwords that trigger bureaucrats. It's a religion where if you question the orthodoxy you're automatically a heretic, as seen by the people screeching that "deniers should be punished" and have financial or social penalties levied against them.
Maybe where you are; in this particular West Coast Microclimate, this has been the warmest and driest Winter on record so far. I have sufficient anecdotal evidence on this, I've been in this same neighborhood for 52 years. When I was a kid, unless it rained, the ground frosted over overnight and puddles would freeze by now. Now, no frost, no freeze... no puddles. It usually snowed once or twice a Winter; it hasn't snowed here in two decades.
Yeah and I have sufficient anecdotal evidence that the weather in Southern Ontario is about on par with previous years, both boom and busts. Generally the same amount of snowfall, sometimes colder, sometimes super cold, sometimes not, sometimes warm. Despite the claims of "warmest winter EVAR"(really this year guys I'm totally serious) the 1940's and 1950's still hold the king for being the warmest winters ever. Along with the most snowfall spanning over a decade. While the late 1970's and early 1980's spanning over a decade hold for both the heaviest snowfall in the coldest period of time. Then again the "meteorological records" that all of this is based on is well...only to 1941, because in a lot of places that's it(if you're really unlucky they may only go back to 1977 here in Canada). It wasn't more then a few years ago that I can remember Decembers where it was so warm that shorts and t-shirts would work okay(15C or so), and it being bone chilling cold 12hrs later right down to -20C. That's also normal around here. Flash freezes suck, and they're really common too.
I also remember the winters that were even colder then the winter we had back in 2013, where -30C went on for weeks on end back in the 1980's. It wasn't called "polar vortexes" when that happened either, but it sure does sound scary. You know that's the thing about microclimates though, they're more apt to have decades or even centuries of very good weather followed by decades or centuries of weather that is completely hostile to living there full time. It's not like California for example doesn't go through 500 year long droughts as a normal or anything right? Wait, you mean it does? Along with most of the pacific coast...well shit huh? But what's that mean for the plains and the east coast? All driven by weather out of the gulf no less.
I think you've just proven my point. I'm done with you.
The only thing you've shown is that your world is divided into: "Left wing to the left of Marx" and "everyone else is a nazi" going by your own posts.
If you really think that breitbart is "alt-right" you've never read an actual alt-right, neonazi or even piece of nazi news and/or propaganda in your life, and are so mentally and socially isolated that you only look for information that further reinforces what you believe.
Uh oh, you skipped the part of the article that says this:
No, I didn't. There's the part where reality intrudes on reported information. So let's see, pepe hasn't been appropriated by anyone. Meme's don't get appropriated. But the only people who believe it to be so are the ones who have no understanding of chan culture. And calling Obama a "lying piece of shit" doesn't make him a nazi either. And Breitbart isn't alt-right. If it is, NPR is far-left, thus it makes listeners automatic communists going by your logic.
Whoops, guess you didn't think this through very hard.
Except you just made up the part about "UAF", didn't you? No, that's on his declaration of political party card you know the one. The one that lets you vote in primaries. You can go look it up anytime you want, those are public record.
There was no connection between antifa and the Sutherland, Texas shooting. Try again.
Yeah and bursting your bubble is just a fun hobby of mine, can't wait for you to go look it up.
You missed the part where the German Communist party paid their own black shirts(aka antifa) - private left wing paramilitary organizations to do the dirty work. And they of course were created to intimidate political enemies and attack people who refused to join the communist revolution. So with that, stop trying to white wash communists, especially german communists.
When you have the WAPO of all places saying that Antifa are just as bad as nazi's, you're in the wrong fucking neighborhood of support.
Oh and you want an example of Antifa killing americans? This one will do just fine. 26 dead at a church. Self-identified as a "UAF" that's "united against facsism" was a hardcore leftist who hated christians, and a extreme atheist to boot. UAF is a splinter of antifa.
People who are carrying an agenda and don't like that the left as a whole has a problem right now. They're trying to bury their head up their ass as much as the right did back in the 90's.
Slashdot Mirror
If you are a patriot then you can't be a Trump fan.
Right, because being for legal immigration, gutting chain immigration, enforcing existing immigration laws is very anti-patriotic. And you probably still don't understand why Trump won, but think a raging racist that holds pro-segregation views and is the #2 in the DNC is the model of a patriot.
Not true in the least, Twitter has ethics of a sort. But those ethics only support a particular view point, and in this case Trump feeds the people who are screeching that "Trump's goin' down, really now, any time, RUSSSIA RUUUUUSSSSIIIIIIIAAAA!" If they were being truly ethical, they would have banned terrorist groups that use it, or banned black bloc and antifa members who openly supported, promoted, or engaged in violence. Instead you've got multiple cases where the people who were victimized by them were banned.
Just remember who their "trust and safety council" is, and it suddenly becomes very clear what form of ethics and viewpoint they're going with.
So in your view, political violence is purview of the left only.
Some amazing reading skills there. Where did I say that? Ah...right...that'd be nowhere.
As I noted above, I use these things in the actual sense they're used. Not in the way that extremists on either side use them. National socialists are distinctly on the right, just like communists are distinctly on the left.
No, you're looking for fascist on the right. National socialists are distinctly on the left, just like the FLQ were national socialists based around marxism. If you don't understand, then go read Plato's "The Republic" which should clear it up.
If you share the views of "national socialists" you're still in the left. The only difference between them and a communist is how best to put their boot on your throat.
Donald Trump threatens nuclear war on Twitter in order to distract from his obvious treason.
Trump threatens nuclear war...with words...which were mocking a tinpot dictator. That same dictator on the other hand who's country has kidnapped women from S.Korea and Japan and pressed them into harems for the military and senior officials of the government. That has fired missiles over Japan, and has Japan on edge enough that not only are they considering a full or partial rewrite of article 9 - that's the section that says they can't have a pro-active military, only self-defense. That they're also considering going nuclear as well, and people are supportive of it. But Trump's the problem...
Far left and far right as two sides of the same coin here. Most reasonable leftists on the other hand share the opinion of the reasonable right wingers. Let the man speak and let everyone make up their own mind what he says.
Quite true, though keep in mind just what the definition of "far right" is these days. If you support freedom of speech, hold a view that patriotism is okay, that political correctness has run amok? You're a far-right-nazi in the minds of those far leftists who are extremely loud, and in many cases hold institutional power in many places from media to education. That proof can be seen to the average Trump derangement syndrome, to the shitshow surrounding Lindsay Shepard at Wilfred Laurier. The "reasonable left" is far right in their minds, and has a lot to do with social media creating ideological echo chambers.
That's not a Trump problem, that's a media problem. More so that media are chasing that "always first" "always sweet-sweet ad revenue" and so on. Welcome to the shitshow that always-on 24hr news media has created, and welcome to the ever increasing irrelevance that the news media has helped create. It also doesn't help that there is very low public trust of the media in general, or that when people point out that they have indeed fucked up, engaged in unethical practices, or whatever else. The media's response is to screech "IT'S NOT US! IT'S YOU!" Queue this up with Journolist, Gamejournopros and so on all pushing narritives, talking points, and so on. Or media outlet's directly handing off their news stories to political parties to make sure that the "story narrative is correct."
Yeah and ignore that impact bit. Since it appears that it was a force nvidia driver update, that decided to install itself despite telling it never to update the driver. What a fucking shitshow on that one.
Seems like an unnecessary performance penalty to push on AMD users. Most likely down for simplicity/consistency on Microsoft's side for kernel code management.
Doesn't seem to have any impact at all on my AMD machine, though I'm seeing around a 5-13% drop in performance with my Intel machine. Both are running the current version of Win10, I'm sure there's going to be a lot of screeching on gaming forums later today when people suddenly start having serious performance issues, especially since Intel holds around 80-90% of the gaming marketshare according to steam. My development machine that's in slow ring right now hasn't seen a patch pushed out yet, probably won't for a few days as a guess. Though there's a lot of talk on the MS boards about it and "when" they're going to push one out.
Meanwhile, your friends tried to play
And it doesn't even say that, when you really are that stupid and think you're right...it makes me marvel at how society supports idiots.
You have multiple fact checkers making you look stupid is all
uh-huh. So far all you've done is prove that your akin to the other person, in more ways then one.
If there are no rules at all, then that's just oppression too.
There are rules. You just seem to want only your form of view to be acceptable though. Got your black boots polished yet?
That is extremely unlikely. I guess you are mixing something up. Those years where amoung the coldest on record in the northern hemisphere
No, I'm not mixing anything up. In fact on January 3rd in 1951 the daytime high was 15.1C, it was 9.5C in 1941. The coldest winter was in 1981 -20.5C
What the last guy did is irrelevant
No, it's directly relevant because their actions or inactions have caused problems that other people have to deal with. Obama shipping boatloads of cash and gold, and knowingly doing so with the explicit fact that it would be used to fund terrorism isn't "what-about-ism." It's something that everyone should be pissed off about, just like if you raged over Bush Jr., and the neocons going into Iraq. Or why Lybia's nuclear program is sitting in Tennessee and was handed over with the explicit guarantee that if they did hand it over, they'd leave him in power. Which of course worked out very well to this day, and Lybia hasn't collapsed to a near non-state.
And while on the neocon bit, democrats, liberals, progressives, whatever you want to call yourself. When republicans started driving them out, you know where they fled to? That's right you do, because the democrats playbook was straight out of it and is to this day. Which is why people like David Frum and ilk were welcomed with open arms by the democrat leadership.
Which means it is no longer science; instead, it's just buzzwords that trigger government bureaucrats into opening the subsidy faucet.
No it's far worse then that, it's not buzzwords that trigger bureaucrats. It's a religion where if you question the orthodoxy you're automatically a heretic, as seen by the people screeching that "deniers should be punished" and have financial or social penalties levied against them.
Maybe where you are; in this particular West Coast Microclimate, this has been the warmest and driest Winter on record so far. I have sufficient anecdotal evidence on this, I've been in this same neighborhood for 52 years. When I was a kid, unless it rained, the ground frosted over overnight and puddles would freeze by now. Now, no frost, no freeze... no puddles. It usually snowed once or twice a Winter; it hasn't snowed here in two decades.
Yeah and I have sufficient anecdotal evidence that the weather in Southern Ontario is about on par with previous years, both boom and busts. Generally the same amount of snowfall, sometimes colder, sometimes super cold, sometimes not, sometimes warm. Despite the claims of "warmest winter EVAR"(really this year guys I'm totally serious) the 1940's and 1950's still hold the king for being the warmest winters ever. Along with the most snowfall spanning over a decade. While the late 1970's and early 1980's spanning over a decade hold for both the heaviest snowfall in the coldest period of time. Then again the "meteorological records" that all of this is based on is well...only to 1941, because in a lot of places that's it(if you're really unlucky they may only go back to 1977 here in Canada). It wasn't more then a few years ago that I can remember Decembers where it was so warm that shorts and t-shirts would work okay(15C or so), and it being bone chilling cold 12hrs later right down to -20C. That's also normal around here. Flash freezes suck, and they're really common too.
I also remember the winters that were even colder then the winter we had back in 2013, where -30C went on for weeks on end back in the 1980's. It wasn't called "polar vortexes" when that happened either, but it sure does sound scary. You know that's the thing about microclimates though, they're more apt to have decades or even centuries of very good weather followed by decades or centuries of weather that is completely hostile to living there full time. It's not like California for example doesn't go through 500 year long droughts as a normal or anything right? Wait, you mean it does? Along with most of the pacific coast...well shit huh? But what's that mean for the plains and the east coast? All driven by weather out of the gulf no less.
I see, so now antifa means "wilf fantasies of my fevered mind"?
You mean like this? or do you mean like this? Because it sure isn't a fantasy in their fevered mind, but it sure does look like you're denying reality.
Yes, it does mean some politics are suppressed and censored. It's a balance, has to be.
Sieg Heil! And all that, because you are what you claim to be fighting against.
I think you've just proven my point. I'm done with you.
The only thing you've shown is that your world is divided into: "Left wing to the left of Marx" and "everyone else is a nazi" going by your own posts.
If you really think that breitbart is "alt-right" you've never read an actual alt-right, neonazi or even piece of nazi news and/or propaganda in your life, and are so mentally and socially isolated that you only look for information that further reinforces what you believe.
Still no evidence shitposter
Did a bang-up job of outing yourself with a second account though. How pitiful.
Uh oh, you skipped the part of the article that says this:
No, I didn't. There's the part where reality intrudes on reported information. So let's see, pepe hasn't been appropriated by anyone. Meme's don't get appropriated. But the only people who believe it to be so are the ones who have no understanding of chan culture. And calling Obama a "lying piece of shit" doesn't make him a nazi either. And Breitbart isn't alt-right. If it is, NPR is far-left, thus it makes listeners automatic communists going by your logic.
Whoops, guess you didn't think this through very hard.
Except you just made up the part about "UAF", didn't you?
No, that's on his declaration of political party card you know the one. The one that lets you vote in primaries. You can go look it up anytime you want, those are public record.
There was no connection between antifa and the Sutherland, Texas shooting. Try again.
Yeah and bursting your bubble is just a fun hobby of mine, can't wait for you to go look it up.
You missed the part where the German Communist party paid their own black shirts(aka antifa) - private left wing paramilitary organizations to do the dirty work. And they of course were created to intimidate political enemies and attack people who refused to join the communist revolution. So with that, stop trying to white wash communists, especially german communists.
When you have the WAPO of all places saying that Antifa are just as bad as nazi's, you're in the wrong fucking neighborhood of support.
Oh and you want an example of Antifa killing americans? This one will do just fine. 26 dead at a church. Self-identified as a "UAF" that's "united against facsism" was a hardcore leftist who hated christians, and a extreme atheist to boot. UAF is a splinter of antifa.
How did this get modded informative?
People who are carrying an agenda and don't like that the left as a whole has a problem right now. They're trying to bury their head up their ass as much as the right did back in the 90's.