I happen to think it's not a bad idea to read Mein Kampf. haven't done it personally, but it's not a bad idea.
You should. It's rather dry to be honest, follow it up with Mao's Red Book(Quotations from Chairman Mao Tse-tung), and toss in some Saul Alinsky(rules for radicals) and enjoy the shitshow when it all clicks in your head.
The thread is titled "FreeBSD confirmed cucks". Calling people cucks is pretty much the alt-right's signature move. They are the only ones who see the world that way.
No, actually they don't. FYI "cucks" in that terminology came directly from chan boards, not the "alt-right." And was used as a term for companies and countries, that seem to have people in power who like watching everyone else get fucked over by their policies. Whether that be the migrant BS in the EU, or a company that abuses their employees using CoC's to protect one group of people, while punishing another.
The alt-right, then latched on to it. You've made it clear that you don't understand chan or anonymous culture in the least, so it's no surprise that you believe that they're the "only ones who see the world that way."
They're russian. You're now getting a dose of cold war politics being pushed by the left because of some ideological reason. That reason is, they're so determined to believe that it was Russia that cost Hillary the presidency, they're willing to triple down.
If the content comes from outside my country, maybe the content should be downranked. It's not just a Russia thing, it's a relevance thing.
The problem is, there are many times where the media *in* your own country won't cover something because of reasons. That happened an awful lot under the Obama(US), Chretien(Canada) and now under Trudeau Jr.(Canada). If you want to find what's really going on, it's almost required that you read opposition news media, or in some cases foreign news media. When I was a kid in the early 80's, I used to listen to USSR, UK, US and CDN media on longwave. That was the only way you got the full story on pretty much any subject. Funny enough, it was ingrained in my by my mother's side of the family who escaped from eastern germany and that was after my grandfather spent 10 years in a gulag after the holodomor they lived through.
People also like to forget that antifa were instrumental in pushing the nazi party into the height of popularity. When antifa was brutalizing people in the streets, it was nazi members defending them. And antifa had the stated goal of making society unlivable in order to overthrow the government and make it communist. The exact same bullshit the little scum are trying today.
Conspiracy amplification site used to justify conspiracy site, priceless.
So you're saying unedited videos are a conspiracy? Just what conspiracy are we talking about here. Where PV was able to get them to admit to something? That they said they actively engaged in it? Well I suppose those are conspiracies. PP did conspire to engage in those practices and admitted to such.
I find it humorous to no end just how far people are willing to go to try and avoid something that might hurt their beliefs.
I bet that whatever happened, it's not as simple as that. What happened to "that apple employee" (whoever they were) may still be wrong, but it cannot possibly be that simple.
I'd rather they be hyper-partisan. As shit as the Democrats are, the Republicans are ten times more shit.
Really? Guess that's why they drove the neocons out of their party and those same neocons then went and nested inside the democrats and are happily wanting more wars right?
They think that because their phone doesn't come pre-installed with Facebook and Instagram and Twitter that it just doesn't have those features?
My 6 year old smartphone that I replaced had facebook and twitter preinstalled. My s/o's 3 year old smartphone had facebook, instagram and twitter all installed, just a FYI.
And that your phone had the full suit of Google apps, EXCEPT for the the Play Store. The Play Store that Google is very keen for you to browse because it makes them lots of money.
I didn't mention that, because I figured you were smart enough to realize that all android builds have the play store installed by default.
Using solely this 'it's on TV, therefore not opinion' logic, I'm pretty sure we can take down at least 80% of Fox News' content. You sure that's the metric you want to use for determining if something is news or opinion?
You mean CNN's content right? Around 70% of what their prime channel, which is what we're talking about is pure opinion. Fox weighs in at a hefty 52% opinion. That's still less then NBC, CBS, ABC as well. All between 56-64%
Still, that's my opinion. And I didn't get it from television, so far as you know anyway.;)
If you're going for fact, it's weighted against you. You can dig through pew research's own data on that one if you want.
Oh, hannity.com, that's bound to be truthful and impartial.
Oh progressive! How one whines, when something comes up that really hurts that bubble they live in. Oh how they whine over a source, and can't read it because it might actually make them question things. Do you have any idea who Sara Carter is? Do you know why she's a respected investigative journalist? No, you probably don't.
I'll give you a hint though, she's the reason why Lois Learner is trying to get her own testimony sealed showing she used the IRS as a political weapon against Tea Party groups trying to get non-profit status. And while you're at it, you can read this right here and see how that uranium really was exported out of the US by slight-of-hand, and how it ties into Sara's article. FYI: Hillary Clinton's office was directly responsible for this action.
Claiming news was fake is EXACTLY what happened in 1930s Nazi Germany.
And you should read some of the media from the time. The media was exactly that, they were yellow press, sometimes muckracker levels of publication quality. The situation is similar because right now, actual investigative journalists are nowhere to be found. Politico, ABC, NBC, CBS? Nope they're not chasing real stories, they're crying over fish food dumped in a pond, and the president of the US taking a drink of water. The trust of the media is so damned low, and it's a creation of their own. They'd rather be hyper-partisan, chase that sweet-sweet-clickbait then anything else.
Now they keep going on about a uranium deal that she had absolutely nothing to do with
You really need to read more. She directly didn't have anything to do with it, that we know of. On the other hand, the person who was just unmuzzled has stated that as an informant operating under the government, the Obama administration knew that there were literal suitcases full of money handed to the Clinton Global Initiative. You know the same one that shutdown this year. On top of that, they really don't know where the uranium went, Shepard Smith was actually wrong FYI. Some of it went to Canada, and disappeared. That's it, it's gone.
You want a real kicker? Remember Lois Lerner? The person in the IRS that blocked Tea Party groups from charity status for years, and the government just turned around and paid $13m out to because she turned around and actually *did* use the IRS as a political weapon. You wanna know why there's still lawsuits? Because she's trying to get her testimony sealed. And it's already come out through a leaker, that even after she was told not to use the IRS as a political weapon to stifle political opponents, she went ahead and did it anyway. Then covered it up.
By posting on/. you're a part of the "tech minority" that can understand to make that choice. The average person does not, and will not unless it impacts them directly. Hell the new phone I just bought came setup for: Google, Google's apps, Google's search, Google's browser(chrome), Google's "social media" system(hangouts), all preinstalled. There wasn't any other options as the default.
Chris Cuomo expressed an opinion on the law. Quite probably an incorrect one. But retracted or not, that doesn't make it fake news
Nope. That was during broadcast TV, not during an opinion segment. That means Cuomo presented that information not as opinion, but as fact. In turn, he explicitly says "that it's okay for the media to do it." That again isn't opinion, that's him implying during a non-opinion segment that only the media are protected.
They're not trolling. Read the DNC email leaks, left-wing publications including broadcast media were sending pre-publication information to her camp, to make sure that it was the correct narrative. And it wasn't limited to single publications. CBS, NBC, Politico, ABC, The New Yorker, WAPO, Boston Globe and so-on all did it. Hell, Donna Brazille came out and admitted that she leaked CNN debate questions to the Clinton camp. They were literally sucking the DNC and Clinton's dick and working as hard as they could to get her elected -- and still lost.
*insert joke that the first red-pill is always the hardest*
Thing is, this isn't limited to the US either. In Canada there are several right-of-centre blogs that have more public draw then our national newspapers. But those news papers will go out of their way to smear and malign them, even after they steal their content.
Have you tried their apps? In fact Fox has half a dozen.
That requires a person to make that choice. Google on the other hand holds dominant market share, with their *own* app that they want to use to curate news. You have no choice.
The FCC hasn't got the memo apparently, but this merger WILL happen.
Doubtful. Read what Trump has written in the past and you'll see he's against mass-centralization of media. The fact that the DOJ is coming out against this should also tell you the way it's blowing, on top of that individual US states are starting antitrust investigations against the big name tech companies(google/facebook/twitter/etc). Their little song and dance on the hill didn't make republicans any happier with what they said, then the democrats who were also sitting on that hearing. Both were equally pissed off at the way they refused to clearly answer any questions on the basis of being neutral.
Slashdot Mirror
I happen to think it's not a bad idea to read Mein Kampf. haven't done it personally, but it's not a bad idea.
You should. It's rather dry to be honest, follow it up with Mao's Red Book(Quotations from Chairman Mao Tse-tung), and toss in some Saul Alinsky(rules for radicals) and enjoy the shitshow when it all clicks in your head.
The thread is titled "FreeBSD confirmed cucks". Calling people cucks is pretty much the alt-right's signature move. They are the only ones who see the world that way.
No, actually they don't. FYI "cucks" in that terminology came directly from chan boards, not the "alt-right." And was used as a term for companies and countries, that seem to have people in power who like watching everyone else get fucked over by their policies. Whether that be the migrant BS in the EU, or a company that abuses their employees using CoC's to protect one group of people, while punishing another.
The alt-right, then latched on to it. You've made it clear that you don't understand chan or anonymous culture in the least, so it's no surprise that you believe that they're the "only ones who see the world that way."
So... what's the issue with RT.com's coverage ?
They're russian. You're now getting a dose of cold war politics being pushed by the left because of some ideological reason. That reason is, they're so determined to believe that it was Russia that cost Hillary the presidency, they're willing to triple down.
If the content comes from outside my country, maybe the content should be downranked. It's not just a Russia thing, it's a relevance thing.
The problem is, there are many times where the media *in* your own country won't cover something because of reasons. That happened an awful lot under the Obama(US), Chretien(Canada) and now under Trudeau Jr.(Canada). If you want to find what's really going on, it's almost required that you read opposition news media, or in some cases foreign news media. When I was a kid in the early 80's, I used to listen to USSR, UK, US and CDN media on longwave. That was the only way you got the full story on pretty much any subject. Funny enough, it was ingrained in my by my mother's side of the family who escaped from eastern germany and that was after my grandfather spent 10 years in a gulag after the holodomor they lived through.
Can we all just accept that Uber is less safe for consumers than asking a drunk who just got thrown out of a bar for a ride?
Funny enough, that's how the regulation of taxi companies started happening in Canada.
People also like to forget that antifa were instrumental in pushing the nazi party into the height of popularity. When antifa was brutalizing people in the streets, it was nazi members defending them. And antifa had the stated goal of making society unlivable in order to overthrow the government and make it communist. The exact same bullshit the little scum are trying today.
That was just a catchphrase.
The Boston Tea Party wasn't a catchphrase, it was putting that statement into action.
Conspiracy amplification site used to justify conspiracy site, priceless.
So you're saying unedited videos are a conspiracy? Just what conspiracy are we talking about here. Where PV was able to get them to admit to something? That they said they actively engaged in it? Well I suppose those are conspiracies. PP did conspire to engage in those practices and admitted to such.
I find it humorous to no end just how far people are willing to go to try and avoid something that might hurt their beliefs.
Yet another example of the benefits of the separation of church and state!
Let's be realistic here. Many of those people simply replaced one religion for another, and still screech that they're atheists to boot.
I bet that whatever happened, it's not as simple as that. What happened to "that apple employee" (whoever they were) may still be wrong, but it cannot possibly be that simple.
Oh, but sometimes it really is *that* simple. And it gets even better! Are you enjoying the progressive stack yet?
I'd rather they be hyper-partisan. As shit as the Democrats are, the Republicans are ten times more shit.
Really? Guess that's why they drove the neocons out of their party and those same neocons then went and nested inside the democrats and are happily wanting more wars right?
They think that because their phone doesn't come pre-installed with Facebook and Instagram and Twitter that it just doesn't have those features?
My 6 year old smartphone that I replaced had facebook and twitter preinstalled. My s/o's 3 year old smartphone had facebook, instagram and twitter all installed, just a FYI.
And that your phone had the full suit of Google apps, EXCEPT for the the Play Store. The Play Store that Google is very keen for you to browse because it makes them lots of money.
I didn't mention that, because I figured you were smart enough to realize that all android builds have the play store installed by default.
Otherwise, we have zero reason to believe that Donald Trump is capable of putting a coherent thought onto paper.
Try picking up a book(or his), it'll do you wonders.
Using solely this 'it's on TV, therefore not opinion' logic, I'm pretty sure we can take down at least 80% of Fox News' content. You sure that's the metric you want to use for determining if something is news or opinion?
You mean CNN's content right? Around 70% of what their prime channel, which is what we're talking about is pure opinion. Fox weighs in at a hefty 52% opinion. That's still less then NBC, CBS, ABC as well. All between 56-64%
Still, that's my opinion. And I didn't get it from television, so far as you know anyway. ;)
If you're going for fact, it's weighted against you. You can dig through pew research's own data on that one if you want.
Oh, hannity.com, that's bound to be truthful and impartial.
Oh progressive! How one whines, when something comes up that really hurts that bubble they live in. Oh how they whine over a source, and can't read it because it might actually make them question things. Do you have any idea who Sara Carter is? Do you know why she's a respected investigative journalist? No, you probably don't.
I'll give you a hint though, she's the reason why Lois Learner is trying to get her own testimony sealed showing she used the IRS as a political weapon against Tea Party groups trying to get non-profit status. And while you're at it, you can read this right here and see how that uranium really was exported out of the US by slight-of-hand, and how it ties into Sara's article. FYI: Hillary Clinton's office was directly responsible for this action.
Claiming news was fake is EXACTLY what happened in 1930s Nazi Germany.
And you should read some of the media from the time. The media was exactly that, they were yellow press, sometimes muckracker levels of publication quality. The situation is similar because right now, actual investigative journalists are nowhere to be found. Politico, ABC, NBC, CBS? Nope they're not chasing real stories, they're crying over fish food dumped in a pond, and the president of the US taking a drink of water. The trust of the media is so damned low, and it's a creation of their own. They'd rather be hyper-partisan, chase that sweet-sweet-clickbait then anything else.
Now they keep going on about a uranium deal that she had absolutely nothing to do with
You really need to read more. She directly didn't have anything to do with it, that we know of. On the other hand, the person who was just unmuzzled has stated that as an informant operating under the government, the Obama administration knew that there were literal suitcases full of money handed to the Clinton Global Initiative. You know the same one that shutdown this year. On top of that, they really don't know where the uranium went, Shepard Smith was actually wrong FYI. Some of it went to Canada, and disappeared. That's it, it's gone.
You want a real kicker? Remember Lois Lerner? The person in the IRS that blocked Tea Party groups from charity status for years, and the government just turned around and paid $13m out to because she turned around and actually *did* use the IRS as a political weapon. You wanna know why there's still lawsuits? Because she's trying to get her testimony sealed. And it's already come out through a leaker, that even after she was told not to use the IRS as a political weapon to stifle political opponents, she went ahead and did it anyway. Then covered it up.
By posting on /. you're a part of the "tech minority" that can understand to make that choice. The average person does not, and will not unless it impacts them directly. Hell the new phone I just bought came setup for: Google, Google's apps, Google's search, Google's browser(chrome), Google's "social media" system(hangouts), all preinstalled. There wasn't any other options as the default.
Nah. Everyone knows that Putin rides bears in the USSR. And they also make you spill your drink.
Oh, you mean THAT Project Veritas run by O'Keefe who was caught heavily editing videos and taking them completely out of context
You do know that they posted in the fully unedited videos right? They're actually worse when you watch the entire thing in full. So much so that the FBI is now looking into investigating planned parenthood.
Chris Cuomo expressed an opinion on the law. Quite probably an incorrect one. But retracted or not, that doesn't make it fake news
Nope. That was during broadcast TV, not during an opinion segment. That means Cuomo presented that information not as opinion, but as fact. In turn, he explicitly says "that it's okay for the media to do it." That again isn't opinion, that's him implying during a non-opinion segment that only the media are protected.
Must resist urge to respond to troll........
They're not trolling. Read the DNC email leaks, left-wing publications including broadcast media were sending pre-publication information to her camp, to make sure that it was the correct narrative. And it wasn't limited to single publications. CBS, NBC, Politico, ABC, The New Yorker, WAPO, Boston Globe and so-on all did it. Hell, Donna Brazille came out and admitted that she leaked CNN debate questions to the Clinton camp. They were literally sucking the DNC and Clinton's dick and working as hard as they could to get her elected -- and still lost.
*insert joke that the first red-pill is always the hardest*
Thing is, this isn't limited to the US either. In Canada there are several right-of-centre blogs that have more public draw then our national newspapers. But those news papers will go out of their way to smear and malign them, even after they steal their content.
Have you tried their apps? In fact Fox has half a dozen.
That requires a person to make that choice. Google on the other hand holds dominant market share, with their *own* app that they want to use to curate news. You have no choice.
The FCC hasn't got the memo apparently, but this merger WILL happen.
Doubtful. Read what Trump has written in the past and you'll see he's against mass-centralization of media. The fact that the DOJ is coming out against this should also tell you the way it's blowing, on top of that individual US states are starting antitrust investigations against the big name tech companies(google/facebook/twitter/etc). Their little song and dance on the hill didn't make republicans any happier with what they said, then the democrats who were also sitting on that hearing. Both were equally pissed off at the way they refused to clearly answer any questions on the basis of being neutral.