I have an xbox360 controller and and every game i have played on steam/pc/linux in the last 2 years has had a profile setup and loaded for it.
Besides pc is about customizing, use whatever controller you want, thats a good thing.
I installed version 4 on my windows 7 desktop and arch linux labtop and I really like it. It is defently an upgrade from 3.6 not having any of the issues others are crying about.
Many things were changed, that nobody wanted changed. Major problems, such as the white space issue are not fixed.
3.x gave the core developers an opportunity, a mile wide, to fix python's worst design flaws. But they ignored those flaws, and did what they wanted to do, which serves no purpose.
The core developers are designing a language for themselves, and nobody else.
Can you list some of these majors flaws? I am just curious.
After two Nvidia video cards and one chip-set died early on me from overheating, despite additional cooling, I am not buying their trash again. Maybe "pro-gamers" do not mind an expensive card or main-board dying after 1-1.5 years, but I do mind rather strongly.
I am with you, I have had 4 Nvidia cards and the only one that doesn't overheat, I spent 100$ on a new heat sink and another 25$ on a good quality fan.
As someone that has worked in similar situations, I see no problem with this ban. there is always retards that think they can crash into your boat/machine to see whats up.
Slashdot Mirror
Windows 7, it won't crash while you are moving important files.
Looked pretty good to me.
for 4 years, 5 days a week and only problems I ever had with it were due to arch linux. Switched to xbmcbuntu and been loving it.
I have an xbox360 controller and and every game i have played on steam/pc/linux in the last 2 years has had a profile setup and loaded for it. Besides pc is about customizing, use whatever controller you want, thats a good thing.
I use and enjoy *unix and I agree with this.
I agree, this none stable ABI breaking shit all the time is annoying.
Nothing beats the freebsd documentation!
Or they could just make the desktop version not suck and do something about its terrible interface.
Updating documentation isn't as hot or sexy as bumping the version up one full major release, whether it deserves it or not.
I have never seen a single open source project ever that gave two shits about documentation. Not one.
FreeBSD (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/) Has done a great job.
I installed version 4 on my windows 7 desktop and arch linux labtop and I really like it. It is defently an upgrade from 3.6 not having any of the issues others are crying about.
And they all were done poorly and showed nothing useful for the real world.
IMO: 3.x is a stupid "upgrade. "
Many things were changed, that nobody wanted changed. Major problems, such as the white space issue are not fixed.
3.x gave the core developers an opportunity, a mile wide, to fix python's worst design flaws. But they ignored those flaws, and did what they wanted to do, which serves no purpose.
The core developers are designing a language for themselves, and nobody else.
Can you list some of these majors flaws? I am just curious.
The article states they are a cult, not Christians. But either way carry on.
Which adds up to not that much and unless you are stuiped, you are rocking 4+ gigs of ram.
After two Nvidia video cards and one chip-set died early on me from overheating, despite additional cooling, I am not buying their trash again. Maybe "pro-gamers" do not mind an expensive card or main-board dying after 1-1.5 years, but I do mind rather strongly.
I am with you, I have had 4 Nvidia cards and the only one that doesn't overheat, I spent 100$ on a new heat sink and another 25$ on a good quality fan.
As someone that has worked in similar situations, I see no problem with this ban. there is always retards that think they can crash into your boat/machine to see whats up.