Most people don't know what an OS is. For most, a computer is just a device, like a TV, or video player. As long as it runs The Sims, The Internet, and downloaded Porn vids, what does it matter.
Go into a high street store, ask for a computer, you get shown a Windows PC.
Just tried in Win2k with Word 2K (both almost fully patched) shell:c:\winnt\explorer.exe shell:windo ws\explorer.exe shell:winnt\explorer.exe shell:e xplorer.exe all don't work.
please dont joke about that, not too long ago I received an email, please help me open this word document. Complete with a BMP, natrally I assumed this was the error message. Nope, it was a "print screen" of its Icon. And yes, while I had said picture up, the user did try double clicking.
Last I checked TS did not alow two people to use one computer, when only one computer exists.
TS will let a second person connect to one computer using a second computer.
If I am wrong, please provide links showing two people using one (and only one) computer (one computer, containing two graphics cards, and two USB keyboards & two USB mice).
S/MIME (admitively slightly different versions of) is supported by Outlook and Mozilla. In both cases you: a) Go to web site. (I use Thawte, as its free, most cost quite a bit) b) Fill in details, wait for keys to be created (and auto insterted into either MSIEs (& thus Outlooks) or Mozillas Key Chain tool). c) Click the "Encrypt" button thats now in your toolbar.
Why do you expect your employer to not read you emails?
if years in tech support has taught me one thing its this, no one reads your emails as they are dull as fuck. I mean, thanks to some Apache Magic we searched on a number key phases, and still the number of false positives ment that it still a waste of time. In the end we faked it. Much more fun.
It is no more difficult to send encripted email in Outlook than Mozilla. In both cases, you inport a key, get sent your friends public key and click the Encript buttons. The problem: convincing people to do that.
Slashdot Mirror
Most people don't know what an OS is. For most, a computer is just a device, like a TV, or video player. As long as it runs The Sims, The Internet, and downloaded Porn vids, what does it matter.
Go into a high street store, ask for a computer, you get shown a Windows PC.
Go on then.
Benedict.
gmail.10.mlk@spamgourmet.com
Just tried in Win2k with Word 2K (both almost fully patched)o ws\explorer.exee xplorer.exe
shell:c:\winnt\explorer.exe
shell:wind
shell:winnt\explorer.exe
shell:
all don't work.
What is the differece between that, and them using VNC?
Download the fix here!
QT is very expenive for Windows uses.
Or you can use KDE-Cygwin (I have before), which is slow.
No.
Mozilla (dont know about firefox, don't use) is fully functional, and lacking nothing (that a web browser should lack) by default.
> but of course nobody uses them anymore these days.
A good chuck of the clipart in MS Word is still in WMF.
please dont joke about that, not too long ago I received an email, please help me open this word document. Complete with a BMP, natrally I assumed this was the error message. Nope, it was a "print screen" of its Icon. And yes, while I had said picture up, the user did try double clicking.
Poor luser.
For 4way, you would not need any extention cable.
Last I checked TS did not alow two people to use one computer, when only one computer exists.
TS will let a second person connect to one computer using a second computer.
If I am wrong, please provide links showing two people using one (and only one) computer (one computer, containing two graphics cards, and two USB keyboards & two USB mice).
Yes, a place with computers.
I don't beleive the data. the netcafes down my high street cost between $2-$5 per hour.
I dont think the two on SF.net were due to MS being forced.
(WIX and WTL, search SF.net for 'em, they are under the CPL)
Do "Be gentle, home server." and a 1600x1200 picture really go together?
:)
(and please say that is the home server
Google?
God No
Its just not fair...
> eVic [what kind of name is that, anyway?
A take on the old VIC 20.
Go S/MIME, and its even easier!
S/MIME (admitively slightly different versions of) is supported by Outlook and Mozilla. In both cases you:
a) Go to web site. (I use Thawte, as its free, most cost quite a bit)
b) Fill in details, wait for keys to be created (and auto insterted into either MSIEs (& thus Outlooks) or Mozillas Key Chain tool).
c) Click the "Encrypt" button thats now in your toolbar.
To quote Tony Blair (AKA Bushes Butt Bunney)
Education. Education. Education.
Rubbish, you don't do it as after the first week you worked out that other peoples email is just plain dull, blogs are bad enought.
That reminds me of the Porn Wars at Uni.
Send every one you know the sickest porn you can find, until everyone else gives in, or pukes up.
I won, yeah for a strange men with large kife, and a big dislike for member.
if years in tech support has taught me one thing its this, no one reads your emails as they are dull as fuck.
I mean, thanks to some Apache Magic we searched on a number key phases, and still the number of false positives ment that it still a waste of time. In the end we faked it.
Much more fun.
The software is already built in to Outlook and Mozilla. Outlook even includes a link to people selling keys, including a free one.
It is not hard, but getting the key could be made easier.
Haha, like that'll ever happen. Both Mozilla and Outlook use S/MIME. Mozilla follow the standard. Outlook makes a slightly different one. *grr*
It is no more difficult to send encripted email in Outlook than Mozilla.
In both cases, you inport a key, get sent your friends public key and click the Encript buttons.
The problem: convincing people to do that.