There's always the idea of patenting 'evil' or 'world domination' techs to prevent Bill G, Monsanto etc... from taking over everything. e.g. Patent business models &co that you believe might exist in the future because of genetics, or DRM or advances in medine.
That way you could charge a high license fee to the company if they don't sell there drugs etc... cheeply or don't generally toe the line. or just not let them pratice at all.
No quite the opposite, I was pointing out that the parent only appeared to be accepting human intervention if he could actually see a human there at that moment in time.
Cheers, After reading the rest of the comments it was apparent that the first part of the Poincare conjecture was proved and the second part had already been proved.
I very much a layman when it somes to topology, but it was still fairly obvious that the proof is very important.
No the reason environmentalists come under attack is because of people like you.
Lets say there's a lake miles away from any people, but down wind from an XYZ factory thats 100 miles, pollutants from the factory can be found in the lake. So, humans have affected the lake.
If they were being perdantic chanobal left it's mark over most places on the globe as did necular testing.
This has a lot of implications for anything in 4d space. Basicly before the proof you couldn't be sure what limits existed, now an extra limit has been placed on 4d environments.
ignoring the ever prevalent and promising 'cyber security technologies'
Would you company invest more in a country if that country offered it some free open code or no free open code.
Would you feel bad about that country having even more to offer by any efforts you put into that free open code or do you think keeping the improvements closed and to your-self is the best way to boot the economy of said country.
Why don't they mandate the companies must run an application on there workstations.
Between 7pm and 7am We have 50pc's doing nothing at all in my office, I'm sure they could be doing some usefull math, especially if there's a national emergency.
Re:What about GPL?? Sources??
on
Xandros 1.0
·
· Score: 1
from the FAQ's " You're supposed to provide the source code by mail-order on a physical medium, if someone orders it. You are welcome to offer people a way to copy the corresponding source code by FTP, in addition to the mail-order option, but FTP access to the source is not sufficient to satisfy section 3 of the GPL.
When a user orders the source, you have to make sure to get the source to that user. If a particular user can conveniently get the source from you by anonymous FTP, fine--that does the job. But not every user can do such a download. The rest of the users are just as entitled to get the source code from you, which means you must be prepared to send it to them by post.
If the FTP access is convenient enough, perhaps no one will choose to mail-order a copy. If so, you will never have to ship one. But you cannot assume that.
Of course, it's easiest to just send the source with the binary in the first place. "
" "Valid for any third party" means that anyone who has the offer is entitled to take you up on it.
If you commercially distribute binaries not accompanied with source code, the GPL says you must provide a written offer to distribute the source code later. When users non-commercially redistribute the binaries they received from you, they must pass along a copy of this written offer. This means that people who did not get the binaries directly from you can still receive copies of the source code, along with the written offer.
The reason we require the offer to be valid for any third party is so that people who receive the binaries indirectly in that way can order the source code from you. "
Re:What about GPL?? Sources??
on
Xandros 1.0
·
· Score: 5, Informative
take the GPL quiz, They must send you a copy, only email or only over the internet. Suitable is taken to mean by the same delivery method as you recieved the binaries, e.g. Post.
also from the FAQ's " You're supposed to provide the source code by mail-order on a physical medium, if someone orders it. You are welcome to offer people a way to copy the corresponding source code by FTP, in addition to the mail-order option, but FTP access to the source is not sufficient to satisfy section 3 of the GPL.
When a user orders the source, you have to make sure to get the source to that user. If a particular user can conveniently get the source from you by anonymous FTP, fine--that does the job. But not every user can do such a download. The rest of the users are just as entitled to get the source code from you, which means you must be prepared to send it to them by post.
If the FTP access is convenient enough, perhaps no one will choose to mail-order a copy. If so, you will never have to ship one. But you cannot assume that.
Of course, it's easiest to just send the source with the binary in the first place. "
" "Valid for any third party" means that anyone who has the offer is entitled to take you up on it.
If you commercially distribute binaries not accompanied with source code, the GPL says you must provide a written offer to distribute the source code later. When users non-commercially redistribute the binaries they received from you, they must pass along a copy of this written offer. This means that people who did not get the binaries directly from you can still receive copies of the source code, along with the written offer.
The reason we require the offer to be valid for any third party is so that people who receive the binaries indirectly in that way can order the source code from you. "
Re:What about GPL?? Sources??
on
Xandros 1.0
·
· Score: 2, Redundant
Umm... I beleive your incorrect check out the gpl, They must provide the source code on the same meduim you recieved the binaries and free of charge.
So if they sell a $99 CD with the binaries on it (ok by GPL) they must also give you the source on a CD, just via email isn't good enough.
Re:Up do date
on
Xandros 1.0
·
· Score: 2, Redundant
Readmore " Technology Preview CD that is included with the product contains many of the most recent software releases including KDE3. "
10000/0.02 = 5000000 log2 = just less than 19 Applying moors law to the earth simulator in japan might be a better Idea than applying it to a desktop PC. I've never seen desktop x-ray crystallography.
A rober armed with what looked like a shot-gun attempted to steal 100 bars of chocolate from a petrol station. When the attendant resisted the robber was heard to mumble, 'fuck, i'm to stoned to even bother'.
From the 1st Jan there will be a number of changes in the servers 'an ISP' is providing. We will be increasing you subscription charge by 25%, Your bandwidth will be limited to 26kbits. We will be capping you email to 20mb a month and browsing to 2000 pages.
All this has been necessary to comply with recent government regulation introduced by David Blunket.
If you have any problems, you know how to vote next time around.
AKA Rabid blind-git then there's Piss poor, jack straw, RIP. I believe that JAck Straw lowered the age of criminal responsability. Introduced all those 'anti-social' behaviour bills, personally sharing my music with the rest of the street is the most social thing I can think of.
and Band-it Blair. Who can prove bin-laden blew up everything, but just can't seem the time to show the proof. Are Blair and Bush related to Alaxander the Great or somthing? Hopefully they won't make it to china either.
If I managed to get a free state I would reform the utilities not privatize them. If you could colaborate the management between the utilities and drop the high costs of laying pipe/cable, processing waste etc.. youd end up with cheep efficient utilities, especially if your running the state and can control them.
They could always go for free market police, I'll shoot anyone you want for $1,000,000,000. Or maybe I'll just give then 1,000,000 and tell them to pretend that they were shot?
Slashdot Mirror
There's always the idea of patenting 'evil' or 'world domination' techs to prevent Bill G, Monsanto etc... from taking over everything.
e.g. Patent business models &co that you believe might exist in the future because of genetics, or DRM or advances in medine.
That way you could charge a high license fee to the company if they don't sell there drugs etc... cheeply or don't generally toe the line. or just not let them pratice at all.
Patents, keeping inovation alive!
I hope that's not the road they go doen, Apple has one of the most unpleasing interfaces I've used. (I'm from the keep it clean and mean camp)
No quite the opposite, I was pointing out that the parent only appeared to be accepting human intervention if he could actually see a human there at that moment in time.
Cheers, After reading the rest of the comments it was apparent that the first part of the Poincare conjecture was proved and the second part had already been proved.
I very much a layman when it somes to topology, but it was still fairly obvious that the proof is very important.
No the reason environmentalists come under attack is because of people like you.
Lets say there's a lake miles away from any people, but down wind from an XYZ factory thats 100 miles, pollutants from the factory can be found in the lake. So, humans have affected the lake.
If they were being perdantic chanobal left it's mark over most places on the globe as did necular testing.
This has a lot of implications for anything in 4d space.
Basicly before the proof you couldn't be sure what limits existed, now an extra limit has been placed on 4d environments.
The proof may also point the way to other proofs
ignoring the ever prevalent and promising 'cyber security technologies'
Would you company invest more in a country if that country offered it some free open code or no free open code.
Would you feel bad about that country having even more to offer by any efforts you put into that free open code or do you think keeping the improvements closed and to your-self is the best way to boot the economy of said country.
More like incase of a war work out how to get around the US missile defence systems, or some code /encyrption.
"Bogies over Alaska, find out how to stop the fuckers next time!"
Hmm.....
I bet a few $Billion can go a long way in 'fixing' voting patterns.
Why don't they mandate the companies must run an application on there workstations.
Between 7pm and 7am We have 50pc's doing nothing at all in my office, I'm sure they could be doing some usefull math, especially if there's a national emergency.
from the FAQ's
" You're supposed to provide the source code by mail-order on a physical medium, if someone orders it. You are welcome to offer people a way to copy the corresponding source code by FTP, in addition to the mail-order option, but FTP access to the source is not sufficient to satisfy section 3 of the GPL.
When a user orders the source, you have to make sure to get the source to that user. If a particular user can conveniently get the source from you by anonymous FTP, fine--that does the job. But not every user can do such a download. The rest of the users are just as entitled to get the source code from you, which means you must be prepared to send it to them by post.
If the FTP access is convenient enough, perhaps no one will choose to mail-order a copy. If so, you will never have to ship one. But you cannot assume that.
Of course, it's easiest to just send the source with the binary in the first place. "
" "Valid for any third party" means that anyone who has the offer is entitled to take you up on it.
If you commercially distribute binaries not accompanied with source code, the GPL says you must provide a written offer to distribute the source code later. When users non-commercially redistribute the binaries they received from you, they must pass along a copy of this written offer. This means that people who did not get the binaries directly from you can still receive copies of the source code, along with the written offer.
The reason we require the offer to be valid for any third party is so that people who receive the binaries indirectly in that way can order the source code from you. "
take the GPL quiz, They must send you a copy, only email or only over the internet. Suitable is taken to mean by the same delivery method as you recieved the binaries, e.g. Post.
also from the FAQ's
" You're supposed to provide the source code by mail-order on a physical medium, if someone orders it. You are welcome to offer people a way to copy the corresponding source code by FTP, in addition to the mail-order option, but FTP access to the source is not sufficient to satisfy section 3 of the GPL.
When a user orders the source, you have to make sure to get the source to that user. If a particular user can conveniently get the source from you by anonymous FTP, fine--that does the job. But not every user can do such a download. The rest of the users are just as entitled to get the source code from you, which means you must be prepared to send it to them by post.
If the FTP access is convenient enough, perhaps no one will choose to mail-order a copy. If so, you will never have to ship one. But you cannot assume that.
Of course, it's easiest to just send the source with the binary in the first place. "
" "Valid for any third party" means that anyone who has the offer is entitled to take you up on it.
If you commercially distribute binaries not accompanied with source code, the GPL says you must provide a written offer to distribute the source code later. When users non-commercially redistribute the binaries they received from you, they must pass along a copy of this written offer. This means that people who did not get the binaries directly from you can still receive copies of the source code, along with the written offer.
The reason we require the offer to be valid for any third party is so that people who receive the binaries indirectly in that way can order the source code from you. "
Umm... I beleive your incorrect check out the gpl,
They must provide the source code on the same meduim you recieved the binaries and free of charge.
So if they sell a $99 CD with the binaries on it (ok by GPL) they must also give you the source on a CD, just via email isn't good enough.
Readmore
" Technology Preview CD that is included with the product contains many of the most recent software releases including KDE3. "
10000/0.02 = 5000000
log2 = just less than 19
Applying moors law to the earth simulator in japan might be a better Idea than applying it to a desktop PC.
I've never seen desktop x-ray crystallography.
A rober armed with what looked like a shot-gun attempted to steal 100 bars of chocolate from a petrol station. When the attendant resisted the robber was heard to mumble, 'fuck, i'm to stoned to even bother'.
hmmm...
He had some very right wing teaching policies when he was education secutry. Reading hours and very set lesson structures.
If he gets voted out locally, to anyone, there's no more David Blunket.
Don't gamble...
Anything that makes it harder for people to gamble the better.
From the 1st Jan there will be a number of changes in the servers 'an ISP' is providing.
We will be increasing you subscription charge by 25%,
Your bandwidth will be limited to 26kbits.
We will be capping you email to 20mb a month and browsing to 2000 pages.
All this has been necessary to comply with recent government regulation introduced by David Blunket.
If you have any problems, you know how to vote next time around.
Have a nice day.
AKA Rabid blind-git
then there's
Piss poor, jack straw, RIP. I believe that JAck Straw lowered the age of criminal responsability. Introduced all those 'anti-social' behaviour bills, personally sharing my music with the rest of the street is the most social thing I can think of.
and
Band-it Blair. Who can prove bin-laden blew up everything, but just can't seem the time to show the proof. Are Blair and Bush related to Alaxander the Great or somthing? Hopefully they won't make it to china either.
I am done now here you go is better than are you done yet???? or am I Missing something really big?
Or they'd just be too fucked to care, or shoot straight
If I managed to get a free state I would reform the utilities not privatize them.
If you could colaborate the management between the utilities and drop the high costs of laying pipe/cable, processing waste etc.. youd end up with cheep efficient utilities, especially if your running the state and can control them.
They could always go for free market police, I'll shoot anyone you want for $1,000,000,000. Or maybe I'll just give then 1,000,000 and tell them to pretend that they were shot?