Slashdot Mirror


England Salutes 150 Years of Eccentric Patents

jonerik writes "Want to patent a moustache protector? Or perhaps you've hit upon the idea of improving chickens' lives by giving them eyeglasses. Well, don't bother - they've already been invented. The BBC has this piece today on the bizarre ideas that have trickled into the U.K. Patent Office on a regular basis since it opened 150 years ago this month. Other doozies which are saluted are a rifle fitted into a helmet, 'the recoil [of which] broke a man's neck during early trials' and the parachute hat. According to Steve van Dulken, who oversees the patent archive at the British Library, 'For every 100 applications lodged, I'd say that 10 are a bit whacky.'"

259 comments

  1. Well I'm glad to know that someone by hrieke · · Score: 5, Funny

    has finally figured out step 2 for the underwear gnomes:
    1. Steal underwear
    2. Get wacky Brittish Patent
    3. Profit!

    --
    III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
  2. Of course.... by Unknown+Bovine+Group · · Score: 5, Funny
    According to Steve van Dulken, who oversees the patent archive at the British Library, 'For every 100 applications lodged, I'd say that 10 are a bit whacky.'

    ... The other 90 are, of course, blatant attempts to cash in on pre-existing technology.

    --
    m00.
    1. Re:Of course.... by OrangeSpyderMan · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm up for a patent on lowest common denominators - they've never even heard of them! Fame, fortune and fraction fun will all be mine! For every 100 fractions I see quoted, around 10 could be simplified :-)

      --
      Try NetBSD... safe,straightforward,useful.
    2. Re:Of course.... by c1pher · · Score: 1

      The other 90 are, of course, blatant attempts to cash in on pre-existing technology.

      No, that's here in the US :)

      --
      The Adult Happy Meal - "I'm lovin' it!"
    3. Re:Of course.... by uncoveror · · Score: 4, Insightful

      At least all the applications mentioned were for tangible things. Here in the US, we are giving patents to intangible ideas, software, and stupid crap like "fat lines." Patently absurd is an understatement for a lot of this stuff.

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
  3. How to make your car more efficient... by 26199 · · Score: 5, Funny

    My favourite is the patent about attaching a wind turbine to the roof of your car to take advantage of a resource that, otherwise, goes completely to waste :-)

    1. Re:How to make your car more efficient... by Blackneto · · Score: 1

      There doesn't have to be wind.
      I think what the OP was getting at was put a turbine on the top of your car to catch the wind caused by the cars forward motion to charge a battery or turn a flywheel or something like that.

      --
      Ursula Andress, Catherine Deneuve, and Charo, twice...
    2. Re:How to make your car more efficient... by ev0l · · Score: 1

      Would that not cause drag on the cars movement? Wouldn't you car have to work harder just to move, burning more gas and thus negating any energy you might gain?

      It is a real question I slept through physics class :-)

      Will

    3. Re:How to make your car more efficient... by Ponty · · Score: 0

      The OP suspected that the drag caused by the turbine would counteract, power-consumption-wise, any power generated. Throw in thermodynamics, and you're leaking efficiency like a sieve.

      Of course, I'm not a physicist, so I have no idea if that's accurate or not. I just think it's what he was thinking.

    4. Re:How to make your car more efficient... by Boba001 · · Score: 1

      Wow, you just re-invented Ram Air! Except it goes on the hood... good for you.

    5. Re:How to make your car more efficient... by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 1
      Would that not cause drag on the cars movement? Wouldn't you car have to work harder just to move, burning more gas and thus negating any energy you might gain?

      Yes, which is why it is funny.

      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
    6. Re:How to make your car more efficient... by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 2

      Actually, RAM AIR works by intaking air and pushing the air into the fuel injection where the cooler, higher pressure air creates a richer fuel/oxygen mixture.

      This has nothing to do with "catching drag", it's more about giving the engine a better way to breathe.

      Because you are burning fuel, the drag induced by the hood-scoop will in most cases be overcome by the higher output from a richer fuel mixture.

      The inactive scoops on some cars today (such as the Mustang) add drag without actually doing anything. These scoops are just for looks and are not actual intake vents.

      The active scoops on very few cars (such as the Camaro SS) are good for about 10-15 extra horsies. Since I have owned a 99 Camaro Z28, and now own a 2000 Camaro SS, I can personally testify that the ram air does create a little more power, though not enough to really notice unless you're intentionally testing the car for the difference. Also, I've noticed the results are best when the air is cool and moist.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
  4. England != UK != GB by Ed_Moyse · · Score: 5, Informative
    Sorry to get all pedantic here, but this is like saying California when you mean the USA!

    • England is part of the United Kingdom.
    • Great Britain is the largest island in the British Isles, and isn't stricly a country.
    • Don't EVER make this mistake in Glasgow!
    ;-)
    1. Re:England != UK != GB by Moog · · Score: 1

      Quite right. Mind you, we Brits don't help
      matters when we the call the British Olympic team 'Great Britain' (rather than 'United Kingdom' or simply 'Britain').

    2. Re:England != UK != GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn straight no Glaswegian would like to be considered as a citizen of the UK if they don't have to. Now sod off.

    3. Re:England != UK != GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Well excuse us for being confused by your unnecessarily complex and misleading names.

    4. Re:England != UK != GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's so confusing about it? They're all regions which are sub or super sets of each other. It's nowhere near as confusing as say "mid-west", which is in fact fairly easter.

    5. Re:England != UK != GB by StressedEd · · Score: 1
      I was just about to make the same comment myself.


      You did simplify things a little though.


      After all, don't forget the "people's republic of Yorkshire" ;-)

      --
      Be nice to people on the way up. You will meet them again on your way down!
    6. Re:England != UK != GB by nagora · · Score: 2
      After all, don't forget the "people's republic of Yorkshire" ;-)

      Rutland forever!

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    7. Re:England != UK != GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You'd think that the fact that the report is on the British Broadcasting Corp.'s web site, refers to the United Kingdom's Patent Office and has a quote from someone at the British Library would be a bit of a hint. But no, someone pulls the scarcely relevant 'England' out of their hat.

      How is the President of Kentucky these days?

    8. Re:England != UK != GB by aurelian · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      • Actually the distinction is not one that people used to make until a few decades ago; people used to use 'England' and 'Britain' interchangeably.
      • The only people who call it 'Great' Britain are Telegraph/Mail readers.
      • The usage {Britain | GB} == UK is common.
    9. Re:England != UK != GB by isorox · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't EVER make this mistake in Glasgow!
      Thats right, scots are puffters that'll lift their skirts at you!

    10. Re:England != UK != GB by Malc · · Score: 1

      I thought it was more a case of the English using the word interchangably. I've noticed Britain and UK seem to be interchangable these days... who knows, maybe within 20 years N. Ireland won't be a province within the UK anymore.

    11. Re:England != UK != GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if you go to somewhere like Glasgow, yes. More eastern places are far more refined :)

    12. Re:England != UK != GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the distinction is not one that people used to make until a few decades ago; people used to use 'England' and 'Britain' interchangeably.

      So these 'people' were just as much wrong then as they are now and merely displaying their ignorance.

      The usage {Britain | GB} == UK is common.

      And just as incorrect.

      These are not things that are defined by whatever is common usage.

    13. Re:England != UK != GB by budalite · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Us people in big rich countries wonder why those people in little-bitty poor countries want to fight so much. Seems a little inefficient and self-defeating, you know.

    14. Re:England != UK != GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except those of tanger^H^H^H^H^H^H orange pesuasion, perhaps.

    15. Re:England != UK != GB by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2
      Don't EVER make this mistake in Glasgow!

      I can vouch for that!

    16. Re:England != UK != GB by operagost · · Score: 1

      Wow, that ought to stop the killing.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    17. Re:England != UK != GB by smithmc · · Score: 4, Funny

      No reason to get snippy about it. People who live in the UK are not the only ones who have to deal with this sort of thing.

      For instance, I live in New York. No, not New York City. There's a whole state called New York, only a small fraction of which (area-wise, that is -- about 50% population-wise) consists of New York City. But try and explain that to people who don't live in the Northeast US, never mind people who live in other countries. To them, "New York" is just one giant superdense concrete-and-glass jungle.

      No, I do not ride the subway to work. No, I do not worry about being mugged every day. No, I do not live in a high-rise building. No, I didn't vote for Mike Bloomberg; I'm not allowed to, only NYC residents are. Get it?

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    18. Re:England != UK != GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even better,

      Toronto is Canada is Toronto to alot of outsiders.

      Oh well, I'm going back to my igloo.

    19. Re:England != UK != GB by Beliskner · · Score: 1
      Well, if you go to somewhere like Glasgow, yes. More eastern places are far more refined
      Yeah, like Hull :-)
      --
      A caveman dreams of being us, the incalculable power and riches. We dream of being Q, then what?
    20. Re:England != UK != GB by Pace3000 · · Score: 1

      It's more a case of Americans using the word interchangeably. Many think that the rest of the UK are actually just parts of England.

    21. Re:England != UK != GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God people learn some subtlety. He was making fun of our (Americans') tendencies to paint the whole continent with our red, white, and blue brush. It's sarcasm and political parody.

  5. "the wake" and "dead ringer" by misterhaan · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It must have seemed like a great idea at the time: an alarm to be fitted inside a coffin, just the thing to guard against premature burials.
    a long time ago there actually was a problem with burying people who weren't dead but seemed to be dead. thus somebody came up with what is still called "the wake," where everyone sits around to see if the person they're going to bury wakes up.

    the phrase "dead ringer" has a similar origin: they'd set up a bell above ground and tie a string or something to it when they buried someone, who could ring the bell and alert everyone that they would like to be dug up as they weren't dead . . .

    --

    track7.org has all kinds of interesting stuff!

    1. Re:"the wake" and "dead ringer" by helzerr · · Score: 1

      Hence the phrase, "saved by the bell"

    2. Re:"the wake" and "dead ringer" by teamhasnoi · · Score: 3, Funny
      "Saved by the Bell"

      If only Screech was prematurely buried, then the luscious Kelly would be mine AT LAST!

    3. Re:"the wake" and "dead ringer" by Flakeloaf · · Score: 3, Funny

      After white folks discovered embalming this was no longer a problem. If whatever was supposed to have killed you in the first place didn't do the job, odds are that:

      - Having an artery in your shoulder exposed and used to pump formaldehyde and methanol through your system
      - Having a cannula stuck down your throat to aspirate the contents of your lungs and stomach and replace them with embalming fluid
      - Having that same cannula inserted into your rectum for the same purpose
      - Being chilled at 33 for a day or two

      would probably finish you.

      --

      Am I the only one who heard Roxette to sing "I'm gonna get blitzed for some sex"?

    4. Re:"the wake" and "dead ringer" by Plutor · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is a rather persistant urban legend, and I'm surprised it's been modded up so far. Snopes has a debunking. In summary:

      Waking the dead is an ancient custom that extends around the world and has existed in Europe for at least the past thousand years. The term refers to the practice of watching over the corpse during the period between death and burial. Partly, this had to do with making sure someone was always around in case the corpse woke up (see our Buried Alive page for numerous stories about premature interments), but the watchers were also there to make sure household animals and assorted vermin were kept off the deceased.

      Saved by the bell is a 1930s term from the world of boxing, where a beleaguered fighter being counted out would have his fate delayed by the ringing of the bell to signify the end of the round. Need we mention that although fisticuffs were around in the 1500s, the practice of ringing a bell to end a round wasn't?

      Likewise, dead ringer has nothing to do with the prematurely buried signalling their predicament to those still above ground -- the term means an exact double, not someone buried alive. Dead ringer was first used in the late 19th century, with ringer referring to someone's physical double and dead meaning "absolute" (as in dead heat and dead right).

    5. Re:"the wake" and "dead ringer" by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      "white folks" discovered embalming?

      Gee, I didn't know whitey was around in ancient egypt.

      Of course, being incinerated on a tribal funeral pyre could possibly 'finish you off' too.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    6. Re:"the wake" and "dead ringer" by misterhaan · · Score: 2
      yeah i always doubted that one for dead ringer--it just has nothing to do with the way it's used now at all. so i apologize for mentioning that one.

      i still think it'd be fun to wake up at my funeral now that nobody expects it :)

      --

      track7.org has all kinds of interesting stuff!

    7. Re:"the wake" and "dead ringer" by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 1

      "Saved by the bell" comes from boxing.

      --

      If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
    8. Re:"the wake" and "dead ringer" by grahamlee · · Score: 1

      - Being chilled at 33 for a day or two would probably finish you.

      Erm, 33 degrees isn't that cold, what with room temperature usally being quoted as a comfy 20.
      Note: The Mars Climate Observer crashed into the planet because Americans haven't started consistently using a single set of units.

    9. Re:"the wake" and "dead ringer" by shadow303 · · Score: 1

      33 Fahrenheit is cold. That's just above 0 C

      --
      I've got a mind like a steel trap - it's got an animal's foot stuck in it.
    10. Re:"the wake" and "dead ringer" by dotgod · · Score: 2
      from the bottom of this page.

      When they drink they would use lead cups and drink ale or whiskey. The combination would sometimes knock them out for a couple of days! They would be walking along the road and here would be someone unconscious and they thought they were dead, so they would pick them up and take them home and get them ready to bury. They realized if they were too slow about it, the person would wake up; also, maybe not. So they would lay them out on the kitchen table for a couple of days, the family would gather around and eat and drink and wait and see if they would wake up. That's where the custom of holding a "wake" came from.

    11. Re:"the wake" and "dead ringer" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think he meant they invented it, just merely learned how to do it.

    12. Re:"the wake" and "dead ringer" by operagost · · Score: 1

      Don't feed the troll.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    13. Re:"the wake" and "dead ringer" by grahamlee · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      My point was this: the OP didn't specify what temperature scale they were using. South America, Europe, Africa, Canada, Asia, Australasia tend to use the Celsius temperature scale for reporting temperatures within human experience, and the Kelvin (absolute) temperature for scientific purposes. It's only America that routinely uses Fahrenheit, and (America!=World)==TRUE.

      At risk of ranting, it should also be pointed out that there are many accepted international standards the Americans choose to ignore. As an example, the most interesting thing to happen on 9/11/01 was an equipment failure at the Hamoaka reactor.

    14. Re:"the wake" and "dead ringer" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't you know that the united states is running the show? if your country weren't so retarded, maybe it could've kept some of the land it acquired in the past 1000 years and expanded rather than trying jam 60 million people into an area slight smaller than oregon. oh, i forgot, you're selectively stupid about the united states so here is what oregon looks like:

      http://www.cse.ogi.edu/oregon-map.html

      maybe if you weren't such a bunch of pussies, you wouldn't have folded quicker than france in ww2 when we asked you for diego garcia! christ, at one point, england was running the show and STILL couldn't keep ahold of its territories! that makes you the biggest bunch of whiny little pussies in existence (you beat the romans by thiiiiis much). get you head out of your ass!

    15. Re:"the wake" and "dead ringer" by Flakeloaf · · Score: 2

      My point was this: the OP didn't specify what temperature scale they were using.

      I didn't think it was necessary - the use of the word "chilled" next to the temperature reading should've implied that 33 degrees is a colder-than-normal state. Now I know better... that being an intermediate superlative to "good". Maybe I should say "Now I know more good." um.. "At this time, now I am aware..."

      aww screw it.

      (To the first person to bring up the Kelvin scale: One does not use the term "degrees Kelvin" or the symbol when referring to the K scale. Thanks though)

      --

      Am I the only one who heard Roxette to sing "I'm gonna get blitzed for some sex"?

    16. Re:"the wake" and "dead ringer" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, while it is true that the average American is still stuck on the old Imperial system, the scientific community does use SI (Kelvins) units. The US Government officially converted over to metric years ago. The US military for example refers to 5.56mm ammunition vs .223 calibre, and measures distances in "Klicks" (short for Kilometer).

      For all intents, unless you're discussing a Scientific topic, it isn't unreasonable to assume degrees Celcius for a temperature.

    17. Re:"the wake" and "dead ringer" by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      True story, at least according to my grandfather:

      During the Great Depression he took a job as a Hearst driver for a funeral company. (Like what programmers are doing now.)

      Near an intersection he had to break kind of hard to stop at a sudden red light. The corpse in the back popped up and forward due to the abrupt deceleration. My grandfather looked in the rear view mirror and was startled to see a corpse staring right at him.

      "I have never been so freaked out in my entire life!", he understandably said.

      Lesson: Break gentally in a Hearst.

      When I see the physics books that say, "A body in motion will stay in motion", I tend to interpret "body" *literally* after hearing that story.

    18. Re:"the wake" and "dead ringer" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe you meant "Hearse", and not "Hearst". Nonetheless, I enjoyed the shared anecdote.

    19. Re:"the wake" and "dead ringer" by grahamlee · · Score: 1

      (To the first person to bring up the Kelvin scale: One does not use the term "degrees Kelvin" or the symbol when referring to the K scale. Thanks though)

      Actually - a Kelvin is a unit of temperature. A degree Kelvin is a change in temperature equal to 1/273.16 the difference between absolute zero and the triplepoint of H2O at standard temperature and pressure :-P. So to boil water from room temperature, you have to heat it through 80 degrees Kelvin to 373.15K.

    20. Re:"the wake" and "dead ringer" by grahamlee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So I get modded Offtopic, and this doesn't? Oh yeah, it's an American web site.

    21. Re:"the wake" and "dead ringer" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, we're all aware that kelvin is a unit of temperature but you DO NOT refer to kelvin in "degrees". the temperature of something is referred to as "0 kelvins" or "273 kelvins". so a kelvin is a change in temperature equal to 1/273.16. aren't you a physics major? is that the kind of shit they teach you in england? christ you british people are stupid. no wonder we had to bail your sorry asses out in ww2. jesus, you're as bad as the french. at least i can go into a burger king in this country and not order a "chicken flamer". go drink some fucking tea, you limey bitch. if you don't like the moderation on this site, go somewhere else. hell, petition theregister.co.uk to put up a comments section. but don't come in here bitching about how "americanized" this site is when you're the ones who can't see that we kicked your sorry asses waaay back in 1783, and we'll do it again too! see this page for more information. so in conclusion, your country sucks!

    22. Re:"the wake" and "dead ringer" by grahamlee · · Score: 1

      Erm, yes. Anyway, you're wrong. The Kelvin is a measure of temperature. The degree Kelvin is a measure of change of temperature. The two systems are calibrated so that a change of temperature from N Kelvin to N(+/-)1 Kelvin is equal to one degree Kelvin. So while you are correct in saying "the temperature of something is referred...." you are incorrect in saying that "a kelvin is a change in....". Because a Kelvin is a measure of temperature defined such that at zero pressure on a constant volume gas thermometer T=0K, and at the triple point of water at standard pressure T=273.16K. Note that these are absolute values, not changes in values.

  6. A funny one indeed.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Here's a funny one...
    One click electronic buying, oh wait..

    1. Re:A funny one indeed.. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Here's a funny one...One click electronic buying, oh wait...

      I bet 100 years from now, there will be a (virtual?) museum of dumb software patents that everybody will laugh at, and not just geeks.

      Put a few sock puppets on exibit there also to set the mood.

  7. New patent by Quasar1999 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if anyone has patented the posting of an article about stupid patents? and I wonder if this patent would qualify...

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
  8. Why not? by spakka · · Score: 2, Funny

    From the article

    It must have seemed like a great idea at the time: an alarm to be fitted inside a coffin, just the thing to guard against premature burials.

    Why is this a bad idea now?

    1. Re:Why not? by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Why is this a bad idea now?

      Because, before a dead body is placed in the ground we pump it full of chemicals that would be leathal if they weren't dead, and we bury folk in concrete vaults.

      We have doctors with EKGs, along with diagnosis of paralysis, comas, and narcolepsy. People used to just fall over and get buried if they didn't get up; we know better now.

      The only folk who have to worry about being buried alive are the undead and the TV-superheros who hunt them--both of which can happily manage to claw their way out of even the toughest graves, so no special precautions are necessary.

    2. Re:Why not? by cperciva · · Score: 1

      Why is this a bad idea now?

      Modern medical knowledge (and practice) makes it very unlikely that a living person is going to be misidentified as dead. In the past, this was not the case; some medical historians have estimated that as many as one in ten thousand people were buried prematurely in medieval times, largely as a result of trauma or infection induced coma.

    3. Re:Why not? by helzerr · · Score: 1

      Probably has something to do with the now common practice of embalming.

    4. Re:Why not? by spakka · · Score: 1

      I thought there were occasional cases of people recovering in mortuaries. I saw a 'Premature Burial' documentary in the UK a couple of years ago. It failed to deliver on the title, but did have some plausible guy claiming his mother had woken up in hospital morgues more than once. Sorry for this lamest of references, but all I can find on Google at the moment are alien autopsies and vampires.

    5. Re:Why not? by Tim+Browse · · Score: 2

      To be fair, presumably in medieval times it didn't take long for someone in a coma to starve to death anyway..?

      Tim

  9. dumb patents by The+Original+Yama · · Score: 1, Informative
    I'm sure there are even dumber patents in the US. The UK has an excuse -- science was still in its infancy, and people were more gullible because they didn't have the kind of access to information and education as we do today. The US has no such alibi. I worry when you can patent absurdities like this.

    More can be found here, here and here.

    If you have the money, you can claim anything as your own.

    1. Re:dumb patents by phorm · · Score: 1

      maybe you don't infringe these seven patents. But we have 10,000 U.S. patents. Do you really want us to go back to Armonk [IBM headquarters in New York] and find seven patents you do infringe? Or do you want to make this easy and just pay us $20 million?

      Recording such a board meeting would probably help nuke subsequent claims.

  10. Re:Interesting patent history by chickenmonger · · Score: 2, Informative

    But see, if that hadn't happened, people from South Dakota wouldn't be able to say: "Well, at least one of us got a Nobel prize." Referring, of course, to Ernest Orlando Laurence, born in Canton, SD.

    BTW, Laurencium, element 103, is named after him.

  11. Britain patents, The first Bra... by gwizah · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...and 100 years later, geeks are still having trouble figuring out just exactly how to remove the damn things.

    Correction: I should say, Just exactly how to get near the damn things.

    --

    There is no spork.
    1. Re:Britain patents, The first Bra... by $rtbl_this · · Score: 2, Funny

      Gosh. There must be some female geeks out there with really smelly underwear by now. And don't get me started on the cross-dressers...

      --
      "Are you being weird, or sarcastic?" said Emma. I said I didn't know because I get the two feelings mixed up.
    2. Re:Britain patents, The first Bra... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell me about it, I put on a bra 7 years ago on a dare and I'm still stuck in it, I just don't grok the locking thingamajig.

    3. Re:Britain patents, The first Bra... by doublem · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Hey, I can remove the damn things from my girlfriend with one hand.

      Ahh, the joy of freeing those fantastic globes of pleasure.

      I have a sudden craving for milk.

      --
      "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    4. Re:Britain patents, The first Bra... by Iamthefallen · · Score: 2, Funny

      yeah well, using a knife or scissors is cheating

      --
      Wax-Museum Fire Results In Hundreds Of New Danny DeVito Statues
    5. Re:Britain patents, The first Bra... by doublem · · Score: 2

      No tools, just my fingers.

      Well, I can do it with my teeth as well, and without damaging the bra.

      --
      "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    6. Re:Britain patents, The first Bra... by isorox · · Score: 2

      Correction: I should say, Just exactly how to get near the damn things.

      Ooh, thats easy, laundrettes, lingerie stores, etc.

    7. Re:Britain patents, The first Bra... by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...and 100 years later, geeks are still having trouble figuring out just exactly how to remove the damn things [bra].

      Let's invent the Remote-Control Bra. Even if we don't get to touch them, at least we can see them with a little bit of hacking.

      And, Imagine a Beowulf cluster of such bras!!!

    8. Re:Britain patents, The first Bra... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to be going to great lengths to prove your bra-removing prowess to the Slashdot audience.

      Perhaps you're trying to entice us to enroll in your undoubtedly excellent class teaching these rare skills. Alas, I am unable to read further details regarding the curriculum, since it's posted at goatse.cx and I'm at work. :-(

    9. Re:Britain patents, The first Bra... by kaizenfury7 · · Score: 1

      In fact, you might still be able to get a patent on the bra. I haven't seen a single example of prior art.

  12. invention: air tight coffins is the answer! by mekkab · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I heard that during the civil war they cut down on these "presumed deaths" by shipping bodies in air tight coffins.

    If you weren't dead when you were put in, You were by the time your body arrived home!

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:invention: air tight coffins is the answer! by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, it was because a months-long journey in a pine box under the hot southern sun would yield a gooey pile of rancid flesh delivered to the family, which was considered highly disrespectful.

      Of course, the run of the mill soldier was still shipped in the pine box. This treatment was afforded to the officers and exceptional 'war heroes'.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:invention: air tight coffins is the answer! by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually, it was because a months-long journey in a pine box under the hot southern sun would yield a gooey pile of rancid flesh delivered to the family, which was considered highly disrespectful.

      Just tell them it was a war injury.

      "Damned Confederates used one of them nasty acid cannons on him, Mam."

  13. Vaguely on topic - Inventors game by RDFozz · · Score: 1

    I have a board game I was given when I was a kid, featuring wacky US patents (not recent ones even then, as I recall) called THE INVENTORS.

    Haven't played it in years, so i don't recall all the inventions. I definitely remember the automatic hat tipper, though.

    --
    R David Francis
    1. Re:Vaguely on topic - Inventors game by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

      Whoa....you posted this while I was writing the comment you'll see a few posts down....

      --
      ...
  14. One they missed by Jack+Wagner · · Score: 0, Funny

    It's too bad they don't try to make some patents on personal privacy. I was over there doing some low level databse consulting work for Lloyds of London last year and I was totally freaked out by all the video cameras everywhere. You can't blow your nose without the Queen getting you on video doing so.

    Still, it still didn't stop me from tossing some bland half-cold fish-n-chips into the street. The Brits may be good at inventing stuff but they need to spend a little more time learning how to season their food in my opinion.

    Warmest regards,
    --Jack

    --


    Wagner LLC Consulting Co. - Getting it right the first time
    1. Re:One they missed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure there will be several thousand relating to the topic of Arrogant Americans...
      And perhaps some US patents on control of firearms might be a good idea?

    2. Re:One they missed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was you...

      I trod in those chips on my way home...
      I got soggy potato all over my trainers.

    3. Re:One they missed by ProlificSage · · Score: 1
      The Brits may be good at inventing stuff but they need to spend a little more time learning how to season their food in my opinion.

      Bland British Food (TM) - Patent Pending :-)

      --
      Real software engineers regret the existence of COBOL, FORTRAN and BASIC.
    4. Re:One they missed by Vollernurd · · Score: 2, Funny

      Heck! If you don't like it, just add us to the Axis of Evil or something. That'll teach us!

      --
      Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules.
    5. Re:One they missed by Malc · · Score: 2

      You're confused. That's no longer the national dish. You should have been eating a curry. That's something that somwhow comes out bland in the USA.

    6. Re:One they missed by Scooter · · Score: 2

      LOL - I suspect you're meant to season it yourself.

      Mind you you're probably right - that's probably why we all eat Indian, Chinese and Italian food in the UK....

      If you think the fish and chips was an experience - try a doner kebab next time you're over :)

    7. Re:One they missed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I was totally freaked out by all the video cameras everywhere"

      Why? Were you doing anything dodgy? Somehow I don't think there'll be any "When people obey the law" videos coming out anytime soon.

    8. Re:One they missed by lovebyte · · Score: 1

      they need to spend a little more time learning how to season their food
      Thank all the Gods, many indian and chinese people give England something they have always missed: Real food. Unfortunately these peoples have not invaded enough of the Netherlands. Gods, they do not even know what food is there! Probably because they have eaten too much tulip bulbs.

      --

      I'll do it for cheesy poofs.

    9. Re:One they missed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And perhaps some US patents on control of firearms might be a good idea? Yeah, thats a great idea! We can disarm all the innocent people, so only the bad guys have guns! Then they can rob/rape/murder with impunity just like they do in the UK! Nifty!

    10. Re:One they missed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You said it! I mean, that's why the UK has those massive gun death statistics, but in the US it hardly ever happens. Oh, but wait ...

    11. Re:One they missed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You said it! I mean, that's why the UK has those massive gun death statistics, but in the US it hardly ever happens. Oh, but wait ...

      And every other violent crime statistic is higher in the UK. Even if you waved your magic wand and made all the guns in the US disappear, and made the further assumption that all murders that would have happened with a gun just don't happen at all (No one would ever think to grab some other weapon) the murder rate in the US would STILL be higher. Disarming innocent people fixes nothing, and only allows criminals to be free from work-related injuries. The UK and Australia has proven this.

    12. Re:One they missed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      If you think the fish and chips was an experience - try a doner kebab next time you're over

      Then you can try out the NHS too.... and you won't be needing one of those coffins with the bells on either...

    13. Re:One they missed by ReidMaynard · · Score: 0
      patents on control of firearms might be a good idea?

      then, maybe, I can get a patent to control the stupid things that come out of your mouth?

      After that, get laws passed to halt gravity

      --
      -- www.globaltics.net

      Political discussion for a new world

    14. Re:One they missed by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 1

      > If you think the fish and chips was an experience - try a doner kebab next time you're over :)

      Which is actually Greek / Turkish.

    15. Re:One they missed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Even if you waved your magic wand and made all the guns in the US disappear, and made the further assumption that all murders that would have happened with a gun just don't happen at all (No one would ever think to grab some other weapon) the murder rate in the US would STILL be higher

      You twat. Do you say that because the US is bigger and better than the rest of the world, or is it that you are a bunch of uncultured arseholes, with something to prove and no roots to keep your animal instincts in check?

  15. Here's One... by Zech+Harvey · · Score: 2, Funny


    Something about a way to connect most of the industrialized nations in the world in order to better exchange information and form a community....naaaaaaaah. Way too idealistic. It'd never work (It still doesn't work if you ask me).

    --
    Zech Harvey, MCSE, MCDBA, CCNA
  16. Why am I not surprised by Kamadan · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why am I not surprised that when you get something like the Prior-Art-O-Matic from the UK that they would take it just one step too far.

  17. Patent Infringement by Deathlizard · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Among these was a cat flap connected to an atomic bomb in space. The device was fitted with a colour sensor, designed to admit his ginger cat but block the passage of a neighbour's black moggie

    Hmm. Looks Like This Company is Infringing on a patent :)

    1. Re:Patent Infringement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Despite what the article says, the cat flap was not connected to the 1000 Megaton orbiting nuclear bomb, it just happened to be mentioned in the same patent. It was actually the cat who suggested the idea for the orbiting bomb, as part of a plan to reduce the price of tinned cat food.

      The full patent is here.

    2. Re:Patent Infringement by Deathlizard · · Score: 1

      Despite what the article says, the cat flap was not connected to the 1000 Megaton orbiting nuclear bomb.

      Well that a relief. Now I can breathe easier knowing that the difference between life or death isn't tied to which cat tries to enter this guy's house. :)

    3. Re:Patent Infringement by stuartkahler · · Score: 1

      Actually, it wouldn't. (even if this crackpot idea achieved patent status) The patent states that it will select the cat based on fur color. The (working) flo-control device you linked to selects between Flo (the owner's cat) and other cats, or even other animals by comparing the profile view of the animal when it comes in. Also, the flo-control device's primary purpose was to keep Flo out when she was carrying dead animals in her mouth.

    4. Re:Patent Infringement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish that the Brits would learn English. I must have re-read that paragraph 20 times while trying to figure out what the heck she meant. Could she and/or the editors not see the ambiguity in the statement? And to think that this got by the BBC's editors.

  18. How to win the War on Terrorism� by teamhasnoi · · Score: 5, Funny
    Air drop a bunch of the RifleHats® (used to be called ShootHats, but it infringed on ChuteHats®) to Afganistan.

    The terrorists will pick them up, put them on and run into battle with American Forces(TM). First shot fired; they fall to the ground with a broken neck! War over!

    America's Freedom Force(TM) - 1, Axis of Evil(TM) - 0.

    Game Over, man

    This idea is patent pending ©2002 Teamhasnoi. Unauthorized use will be turned over to Panip, Inc.

    1. Re:How to win the War on Terrorism� by leoboiko · · Score: 2, Funny

      America Freedom Force -1, Axis of Evil -0? Since -0 == 0 and 0 > -1, America is losing?

      --
      Prescriptive grammar:linguistics :: alchemy:chemistry. Stop being a nazi and learn some science.
    2. Re:How to win the War on Terrorism� by teamhasnoi · · Score: 3, Funny
      As of press time, America's Freedom Force(TM) has not licenced my idea. So unfortunately, yes, we are losing.

      BTW - You might want to patent that algorithm (-0 == 0 and 0 > -1).

      Algorithms are very valuable patents.

    3. Re:How to win the War on Terrorism� by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The recoil problem could have easily been solved by making the hat fire both forwards and backwards at the same time.

    4. Re:How to win the War on Terrorism� by fireboy1919 · · Score: 2

      Drop a couple of those parachute hats too. Unlike the rifle design, which could be perfected enough to minimize the recoil,there's no way you could attach a parachute to your head without hanging from your neck.

      And what if its just a normal hat, i.e. no attachment at all? You won't be wearing it for long. Give it to the terrorists along with some kind of device that launches people into the air. If the broken neck doesn't get them, the impact will.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    5. Re:How to win the War on Terrorism� by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rifle-hat idea immediately reminded me of MDK.

    6. Re:How to win the War on Terrorism� by Roxton · · Score: 1
      You think that's bad? Try the nuclear artillery piece known as the Davy Crockett. It has the distinction of being the only weapon with a blast radius greater than its range. :D

      -=Roxton

    7. Re:How to win the War on Terrorism� by operagost · · Score: 1

      Insightful? Everyone knows he was using the hyphen as a delimiter and not an operator. Sheesh, people get smacked down for misuse of punctuation.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    8. Re:How to win the War on Terrorism� by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2
      Air drop a bunch of the RifleHats® to Afganistan.

      Why the hell not! They got most of their arms, training and funding from the west anyway. Maybe we can give them royalty points or repeat buyer discounts?

    9. Re:How to win the War on Terrorism� by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your "American Forces" is too similar to the Hasbro "GIJOE" (TM) line, and infringes on the GIJOE trademark. The US military is asked to forfeit royalties on the order of 70.4million US dollars (the cost of a General's toilet seat) or cease operations immediately otherwise we shall have to seek legal action.

    10. Re:How to win the War on Terrorism� by leoboiko · · Score: 1

      That was not insightful at all. I was making a joke. Laugh.

      --
      Prescriptive grammar:linguistics :: alchemy:chemistry. Stop being a nazi and learn some science.
  19. I remember this game.... by cybermace5 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I was young(er), we had a game that included much of these patents. It was titled "Inventors" or "The Incredible Machine" or something. Each invention was on a card, and had a certain base value. You could buy patents from each other, roll the dice right and get into the "royalty track", have silent partners investing in your holdings, and best of all it came with a little machin that rolled the dice for you and rang a little bell.

    It was all in a turn-of-the-century theme, and was a lot of fun. Perhaps a modern version of the game could include Rambus-style tactics...nah. If we'd had that, my sisters would have started pulling each others hair, and someone would be running crying to Mom.

    One of my favorite inventions was the automatic hat-tipper.

    --
    ...
    1. Re:I remember this game.... by Reziac · · Score: 3, Funny

      One day, growing bored with the stasis that eventually overtakes most Monopoly games, I changed the rules to allow hostile takeovers. IIRC, it went like this:

      If all of one property group are under single ownership, it's immune. But if you land on a property that's not yet owned as a complete set, you can force the owner to sell by paying them 3 times the standard price.

      Needless to say, money flew around the table as if propelled by a hurricane.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:I remember this game.... by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2
      Buy it Now!

      (Not my Auction, BTW)

    3. Re:I remember this game.... by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      I have also played that game and can not think of the name.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    4. Re:I remember this game.... by nounderscores · · Score: 2

      Interesting.... Imagine simulating the entire tech business world using a number of different games tied to the same money pool.... Monopoly, something like "that incredible machine", some kind of simulation of the stock market, and poker to simulate the after work deal making and money losing that all execs do....

      And maybe some kind of hack of "the game of life" or Rob T Kiyosaki's Cashflow to simulate your family.

      all funds fully transferable between games.

    5. Re:I remember this game.... by Reziac · · Score: 2

      I think we already have that situation; it's called a "conglomerate" :)

      It does bring up the question, tho -- to what degree are these companies *creating* new value (usually defined as "wealth") vs. merely redistributing old value (a la Monopoly, where there is a limit on the total cash involved)..??

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    6. Re:I remember this game.... by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      a la Monopoly, where there is a limit on the total cash involved

      Not by design, and not (IIRC) in the offical rules.

      Each player who gets around once gets $200, almost every time they get to "GO." It's plausible to imagine a long monopoly game where bidding gets higher and higher and higher, and the prices simply skyrocket beyond what's listed. (Doing so would require some imaginative playing, though...)

    7. Re:I remember this game.... by catfood · · Score: 2
      One of my favorite inventions was the automatic hat-tipper.

      Mine was... the "eye protector for chickens." Which sounds very much like the one in the BBC article.

    8. Re:I remember this game.... by Reziac · · Score: 2

      As you say, not officially, but practically so since tho you can buy extra money packs, normally you don't get an unlimited supply with the game :) But gameplay could have become even more extravagant under my "new rules" if we'd had more money to throw around! As it was, the entire cash pile got redistributed every 3rd move or so. IIRC, at one point we issued some "virtual cash" to everyone, because there simply wasn't enough paper money. Inflation strikes the board-gaming world :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    9. Re:I remember this game.... by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 1

      Want me to add this to the TODO / planned features list of Atlantik? Seems like there is a large demand for customizing games (good thing you can already designed your own boards with a Designer app).

    10. Re:I remember this game.... by Reziac · · Score: 2

      [goes to look] Hey, why not? You might call it "Hostile Takeover mode" :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  20. Re:Interesting patent history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so if it was patented, the govts would have ignored it for sakes of national security. or just paid the fees?

    so nuclear weaponary/development can still go to the people with the most money

    good call

  21. Re:Why do Brits have disgusting teeth? by ensjoeski · · Score: 0, Troll

    Someone has watched too many Austin Powers movies. I've yet to meet a former GB'er here in the states that has that type of problem (maybe just the typical teeth problems, no worse than the average American).

  22. Goes right up there with ... by Vuzz · · Score: 1

    - the rocking chair's oil

    - the parsley straightener

    - the gut be gone

    - the chia pet

    - space monkeys

    - the ball spot remover (spay paint for your skull)

    and the pet rock.

    Fascinating sometimes how unuseful these inventions (barely) are. Just have a look ( if you can bare it ) at those info-mercials late, way late at night and you'll see some fine examples of silly contraptions. Most of which are patent pending...

    --Vuzz/

    1. Re:Goes right up there with ... by Cyno01 · · Score: 2

      space monkeys, i dont know what they are, but i want one (some?)

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    2. Re:Goes right up there with ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      usually its that cokehead don lopar on. "with TINY classified ads"

  23. Oh PATENTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    When I first read the title, I thought England was saluting 150 years of eccentric PARENTS.

  24. Re:Interesting patent history by lmfr · · Score: 1

    Pantenting removes the secrecy. That's one of the advantages of patents to the society.

  25. Old (read: classic) joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, at least in the UK they didn't come up with screen doors for submarines or braille street signs they way the did.

    1. Re:Old (read: classic) joke by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2
      braille street signs

      What is wrong with Braille street signs? May places have them, giving directions to blind folk, yes, in a place you can touch them. Damn good idea if you ask me. Lord knows how they find them though...

    2. Re:Old (read: classic) joke by KillerBob · · Score: 1

      Braille buttons on a drive-in ATM... Not a joke... they really are like that around here.

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    3. Re:Old (read: classic) joke by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What good is Braille on ATMs anyway? (drive-in or otherwise). The screen is not Braille...

      --
      sudo eat my shorts
    4. Re:Old (read: classic) joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Presumably the blind learn ATMs, so they know what buttons to press when. (It would be useful to have a button marked, in braille, "CASH (Typed Amount)" so the visual deficiency survivors can press this button immediately after entering their PINs, enter the amount and just wait for the notes. (Audible announcements are too much of a security risk in general, but an alternative would be a headphone socket. This would not help the aurally inconvenienced, however.)

  26. Re:Interesting patent history by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    IP law isn't as bad as you think, just imagine the safe and secure world we'd be living in today if this evil technology had remained a secret.

    You do realize that if the patent had been granted, it would have disseminated the information more *widely*, due to the fact that patents are available for anyone to read?

    You also realize that a cyclotron is about as useful for making nuclear weapons as pocket lint would be?

    I know, I know, IHBT...

  27. Re:Interesting patent history by Mr_Dyqik · · Score: 3, Informative

    Lawrence reportedly got the idea for the cyclotron after looking at the pictures in a foreign (German?) engineering journal. An engineer had come up with the idea of making high voltages by linking pairs of cylinders at opposite phase of a HV AC cycle into a line. Lawrence basically coiled the idea up into a circle. The fact that charged particles in a magnetic field always circulate with the same period allows this to work efficiently.

    It is claimed that Leo Szilard independently came up with this idea about 6 months before, but didn't do anything with it.

  28. Re:Interesting patent history by nautical9 · · Score: 2, Informative
    When someone has a patent on a technology, it doesn't prevent others from stealing it and using it themselves. It just means the original owner of the patent must now take them to court to win damages back, assuming they're aware of the theft in the first place.

    It's akin to software companies - they can sell their games without any copy-protection whatsoever, and just hope everyone follows copywrite laws, but this obviously doesn't happen very often.

  29. chicken glasses by ebonkyre · · Score: 2, Informative
    >Or perhaps you've hit upon the idea of improving chickens' lives by giving them eyeglasses.

    Actually, the point of eyeglasses for chickens is to worsen their vision, not improve it; the purpose being to reduce territorial fighting between roosters in overcrowded coops.

    To be really silly, you need to patent contact lenses for chickens: http://home.nycap.rr.com/useless/chickens/

    --
    "Time is an abstract concept devised by carbon-based lifeforms to monitor their ongoing decay." - Thundercleese
    1. Re:chicken glasses by archeopterix · · Score: 4, Informative
      Actually, the point of eyeglasses for chickens is to worsen their vision, not improve it; the purpose being to reduce territorial fighting between roosters in overcrowded coops.

      To be really silly, you need to patent contact lenses for chickens: http://home.nycap.rr.com/useless/chickens/ [rr.com]
      Actually the contact lenses aren't silly - it's the cheapest way to make the chickens see red (literally). Why? As far as I know it's because chickens (not only roosters) have this instinct of pecking at contrasting spots. When they are overcrowded it creates a positive feedback loop - a chicken gets hurt, the other chicken see the blood, peck, more blood -> a dead chicken. This is to prevent it - through red glasses the blood does not stick out this much. Another way is to use red lights.
    2. Re:chicken glasses by f97tosc · · Score: 2

      Actually, the point of eyeglasses for chickens is to worsen their vision, not improve it; the purpose being to reduce territorial fighting between roosters in overcrowded coops. To be really silly, you need to patent contact lenses for chickens:

      The lenses also serve to reduce the vision. Furthermore they are colored in red, as this color somehow calms the birds down.

      I thought this was a joke, but then I got to see an instructional video about it. The alternative to manually putting in these lenses is to either only have one bird per cage or to destroy their beaks (in a rather cruel manner) so that they cannot harm each other too much. I believe, however, that the latter is the most widely spread practice.

      Tor

  30. Stuff in pointed brackets got deleted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Well, at least in the UK they didn't come up with screen doors for submarines or braille street signs they way the did.

    You insert the name of the ethnic group you want to make fun of there.

  31. Re:Interesting patent history by Mr_Dyqik · · Score: 2

    The parent is untrue. See other posts in this thread for details.

  32. Eccentric what? by compugeek007 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh - I though it read 150 years of Eccentric pants Which could be a celebration coming up if you look here.

    --
    Jesse Wolfe Sr. Manager Systems Integration
  33. USA! USA! by buzzdecafe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We have our share of patent zaniness on the left side of the Atlantic as well.

    Wacky patent of the month

    For example . . .

    1. Re:USA! USA! by JonWan · · Score: 1

      Just don't use that Metallica Cd for your sound source or you might blow the enamel right off your teeth.

    2. Re:USA! USA! by Tablizer · · Score: 2


      I patented the blank, read-only CD

    3. Re:USA! USA! by dosun88888 · · Score: 1

      March 2002
      U.S. Patent Des. 134,115 to Maxwell B. Litwin
      Design For An Animated Amusement Device

      You have to see this one. Just the damn picture.

      ~D

  34. Re:Why do Brits have disgusting teeth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you ever eaten the most often ordered dish in Britrish restaurants?

    It's Chicken Tikka Masala. I suggest _you_ try a phall instead.

  35. Re:Interesting patent history by Zathrus · · Score: 5, Informative

    Moderators, realize this guy is a troll and nowhere close to a "Physics Genius".

    The first cyclotron patent was awarded to Ernest Lawrence in 1934, after being prompted to file for the patent by investors and being told that another scientist at Raytheon was about to patent the same thing.

    Search Google, you'll find that there is nothing that indicates a cyclotron patent was rejected for any such reason.

    Since there was a patent granted on the cyclotron, the rest of your arguments fall apart. Not surprising since they're full of shit.

    Moderators - feel free to mod me down. But mod down the idiot parent post first.

  36. eyeglasses?!? by jkramar · · Score: 2, Funny
    perhaps you've hit upon the idea of improving chickens' lives by giving them eyeglasses.

    They're spectacles, you unbespectacled freaks!
    --

    true && more || less
  37. Patent of the year: by cordsie · · Score: 5, Funny

    Four words: IP over pneumatic tube.

    1. Re:Patent of the year: by Xformer · · Score: 1

      Where each canister would contain what... an XML document?

      --
      All I want is a kind word, a warm bed and unlimited power.
    2. Re:Patent of the year: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think there was one on /. a while back which was IP over avian carrier, it even has an RFC, if i recall correctly ....

  38. A Collection of Wacky Patents by StCredZero · · Score: 3, Funny

    Here

    I especially like the "Horse Masturbation Preventer". (Seriously, look at the page!)

    1. Re:A Collection of Wacky Patents by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've heard of this before.

      Horses don't 'masturbate'. This was actually to prevent someone from sneaking into your stable, giving your 2 million dollar stallion a handjob, and stealing "the stuff that dreams are made of".

      You'd be surprised what a tube of good horse semen is worth these days.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:A Collection of Wacky Patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      On a related note..

      Here is the "Human Masturbation Preventer".

    3. Re:A Collection of Wacky Patents by sirius_bbr · · Score: 1

      On a related note..
      Here [janisian.com] is the "Human Masturbation Preventer".


      And here another one :)

      ...sorry ;P...

      --
      this sig has intentionally been left blank
  39. Re:Why do Brits have disgusting teeth? by 91degrees · · Score: 0, Troll

    Complaints of flavourless food is a bit hypocritical coming from a yank - a nation who's sole contribution to international cuisine seems to be the hamburger.

  40. Re:Why do Brits have disgusting teeth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I were him, I'd stick to boiled rice and popadoms. Maybe some mango chutney, if he's the rakish type!

  41. No different then the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No different then the patents that we allow here.
    Hyperlinks etc..

  42. Error in title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Really, the title to this article should be "British patents...". Strictly speaking, England and Scotland have not been sovereign states since 1703. Since then there has been one British government.

  43. The UK Patent Office doesn't have monopoly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The US Patent Office has certainly received its share of eccentric patents:
    -One-Click Shopping
    -Here's one discussed the other day...
    -Any Software patent
    Too bad the US also leads in enforcing eccentric patents as well!

  44. Not SD, ND by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Laurencium was named after Lawrence Welk, who was from North Dakota.

    1. Re:Not SD, ND by chickenmonger · · Score: 1

      Lawrence Welk started his career in radio broadcasting at none other than WNAX, in Yankton, South Dakota.

      Lawrence Welk biography

    2. Re:Not SD, ND by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But he was born in ND. :D
      Lawrence Welk on everything2.com

  45. Must be rubbing off ... by Rajesh+Raman · · Score: 2, Funny

    'For every 100 applications lodged, I'd say that 10 are a bit whacky.' ... which is itself a whacky way of saying that 1 out of 10 applications is whacky.

  46. Ececntric by harks · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you're rich, you can be eccentric. If you are poor, you're just crazy. :)

    1. Re:Ececntric by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      If you're rich, you can be eccentric. If you are poor, you're just crazy. :)

      Well, I think that Micheal Jackson is just plain crazy, regardless of how much money he has. Oxygen tanks? Chimp zoos? Slumber parties with little boys? Rubber skin?

      He has gone beyond eccentric. He's Crazy!

  47. Nuclear Weapons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You also realize that a cyclotron is about as useful for making nuclear weapons as pocket lint would be?

    Way to go. You just gave Saddam the last thing he needed to make nukes.

    Like he ever would have figured out pocket lint.

  48. Re:Interesting patent history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They may not have the widespread damage capabilities of a nuclear weapon, but accelerated particles can put an eye out.

    Damn they hurt.

  49. Wacky patent of the month... by twoslice · · Score: 1

    For those who want to see if their patent idea has already been taken... http://colitz.com/site/wacky.htm

    --

    From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
  50. Re:Why do Brits have disgusting teeth? by ensjoeski · · Score: 0

    Troll??? That's a true and non-degrading statement!

  51. And the winner is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot poll - what is the wackiest patent ever granted:
    1. moustache protector
    2. chicken eyeglasses
    3. rifle helmet
    4. CowboyNeal

  52. Sometimes email forwards are bad sources by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 2
    a long time ago there actually was a problem with burying people who weren't dead but seemed to be dead. thus somebody came up with what is still called "the wake," where everyone sits around to see if the person they're going to bury wakes up.
    No, that's not where it comes from.

    From The American Heritage Dictionary:
    "ETYMOLOGY: Middle English wakien, waken, from Old English wacan, to wake up and wacian, to be awake, keep watch; see weg- in Appendix I."

    The word "wake" is just related to the word "watch" and has to do with a vigil and essentially doing the same kind of thing we do nowadays at a wake.

    the phrase "dead ringer" has a similar origin: they'd set up a bell above ground and tie a string or something to it when they buried someone, who could ring the bell and alert everyone that they would like to be dug up as they weren't dead . . .
    Oh, I see! So that's why a "dead ringer" is someone who looks just like someone else!... er huh?

    From takeourword.com (as well as other places that aren't email forwarded urban legends):

    "The term dead ringer is one of the terms which means 'lookalike'. It dates in writing from about 1891 and arose from ringer 'a horse entered fraudulently in a race'. It is thought that ringer came from the British expression ring in 'to substitute or exchange fraudulently' (1812). Some believe that ring in is related to ring the changes 'to substitute counterfeit money in various ways', a pun on ring the changes 'go through all the variations in ringing a peal of bells.' The dead in dead ringer is probably the same as that in dead heat or dead on, i.e., it means 'exact'."

    I feel like the Internet has really caused word etymology urban legends to flourish in the past few years.
    --

    If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
    1. Re:Sometimes email forwards are bad sources by misterhaan · · Score: 2
      unfortunately you have failed to discount the tradition of the wake, while being redundant about dead ringer! please see this post which managed to be informative without trying to bash someone elses post

      the meaning of the word "wake" is a different thing from the tradition of the wake at funerals. if someone actually finds something credible that says the wake never had anything to do with seeing if the presumed dead person would wake up (the other post actually DID say that this was part of the wake), i would be very interested!

      as for "dead ringer," i never thought that made sense and probably shouldn't have posted that considering i never believed it either. also, i don't read e-mail forwards (actually anything with fwd: or fw: gets trashed before i see it) and heard this from a friend (who very well may have read it in an e-mail forward).

      --

      track7.org has all kinds of interesting stuff!

    2. Re:Sometimes email forwards are bad sources by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 1
      please see this post [slashdot.org] which managed to be informative without trying to bash someone elses post

      Sorry if you decided to take it personally, but I was bashing the email forwarding and other Internet-related means that have caused false etymologies to become widespread.

      if someone actually finds something credible that says the wake never had anything to do with seeing if the presumed dead person would wake up (the other post actually DID say that this was part of the wake), i would be very interested!
      There is a difference between having something to do with the word, and actually being the place where the word/phrase came from.

      Here is another source talking about "wake":

      "Also, maybe not all of the people they were burying were dead. So they would lay them out on the kitchen table for a couple of days, the family would gather around and eat and drink and wait and see if they would wake up. That's where the custom of holding a 'wake' came from.

      Afraid not. The noun wake comes from the exact same source as the verb. Night-long vigils known as wakes have been a religious observance since Anglo-Saxon days. It is related to watch."

      My point was that "wake" is comes from people having a vigil for the dead, and not from seeing if the dead person "waking up" (even if some might have done that at one time).

      Again, don't take it so personally. Yes, I was bashing, but not you, and I thought that was clear in my original post. You yourself said you didn't even believe the "dead ringer" one.
      --

      If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
    3. Re:Sometimes email forwards are bad sources by misterhaan · · Score: 1
      sorry to misinterpret--i just see a lot of bashing of other posters and think it's petty and childish.

      bashing e-mail forwards though . . . that stuff is practically "spam your friends"

      --

      track7.org has all kinds of interesting stuff!

    4. Re:Sometimes email forwards are bad sources by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 1
      bashing e-mail forwards though . . . that stuff is practically "spam your friends"

      Well, not just email forwards, but also personal websites that use information from places like email forwards, which adds (undeserved) credibility to the myth. It all seems to creep throughout the Internet, making it hard to discern. I didn't check this to see, but it's possible that more sites give the false "dead ringer" explanation than the real one.

      Anyway, I don't know if you even care about etymologies, but if you are, I think the most interesting site out there concerning word origins is Take Our World (which I linked to before). I think they are pretty accurate too.
      --

      If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
  53. THIS WAS NOT A TROLL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, I don't know who modded this down but all I know is that whoever did so either (a) took the post too seriously or (b) didn't read it carefully or (c) some combination of (a) and (b). This was not intended to be a flame or anything. People here make jokes about spelling errors/typos all the time (and get modded up for it.). Maybe some of those here are biased against anonymous posters or something and they don't bother to RTFM and just mod down anyone who is anonymous. Who knows?
    Yeah, I know that this system isn't perfect but it's so much of problem that it must be making the users not want to post for fear that it'll be misundestood my someone with too many mod points who doesn't bother to read the message carefully.
    I just thought I'd point out what these people who don't know how to mod are doing. End of rant.

  54. Pok, pok, pkok!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Astro Chicken!!!!!

  55. Re:Interesting patent history by Spunk · · Score: 2

    Indeed. Moderators should look at PhysicsGenius's other posts. Merely sounding convincing should not be a +1, people.

  56. James Beard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hush up now.

    1. Re:James Beard by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Huh? Who?

  57. Great Britain ... by vrai · · Score: 3, Interesting
    .. simply means 'large' Britain, i.e. Britain and Scotland. The only people who either don't know, or take exception to this are more-lefty-than-thou Guardian readers.

    This is the reason we have a Great Britain team at the olympics, the Northern Irish are part of the Eire team.

    In summary:

    • England + Wales = Britain
    • Britain + Scotland = Great Britain
    • Great Britain + Northern Ireland = United Kingdom
    1. Re:Great Britain ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      England + Wales = Britain

      Yeah, if you go by Hadrian's Wall. Scotland is considered part of Britain; the island called Britain. The Union of Crowns created Great Britain (this was when King James VI of Scotland became James I of England).

      Please don't bring the Scottish parliament into this. Someone please abolish it. Yeah, and this coming from a Scot.

    2. Re:Great Britain ... by aurelian · · Score: 1
      This is the reason we have a Great Britain team at the olympics, the Northern Irish are part of the Eire team.

      Er.. no they aren't. Try again.

      And I'm not sure where you got England + Wales = Britain from either - presumably the same orifice.

    3. Re:Great Britain ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .. simply means 'large' Britain, i.e. Britain and Scotland.

      Wrong.

      The only people who either don't know, or take exception to this are more-lefty-than-thou Guardian readers.

      Wrong.

      This is the reason we have a Great Britain team at the olympics, the Northern Irish are part of the Eire team.

      Wrong.

      In summary:

      * England + Wales = Britain


      Wrong.

      * Britain + Scotland = Great Britain

      Wrong.

      Great Britain + Northern Ireland = United Kingdom

      Hurrah!

      1 out of 6. Must try harder.

    4. Re:Great Britain ... by Ponty · · Score: 1, Funny

      I suspect a more than a few devolutionists (and Welsh!) would take exception to that suggestion. But what do I know, I'm an American. From America. The country. Of America.

      (Enough of that, moving on...)

    5. Re:Great Britain ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The word Britain is most recently from the Roman word for the province that covered England and Wales.

    6. Re:Great Britain ... by Amanset · · Score: 2

      .. simply means 'large' Britain, i.e. Britain and Scotland.

      Bollocks. Absolute bollocks.

      Great does mean large, but that is because there is a "small Britain" otherwise known as Lesser Britain.

      Do you know where it is?
      Hint: Isn't it strange that there is a place in Northern France called "Brittany"?

    7. Re:Great Britain ... by the_womble · · Score: 1
      Scotland used to be refered to as "North Britain". The only example I can think of is off the top of my head is in The Importance of Being Earnest where Jack gives an address as "The Sporran, Fifeshire, N.B.", but I have seen it used elsewhere (although not in anything recent).

      Given the use of the term North Britain, and the fact the the term Great Britain was introduced when England and Wales were united with Scotland, are you sure Great Britain is used to distinguish it from Britanny, rather than Britain? If so can you tell us what the country consisting of England and Wales was called before the union with Scotald?

  58. Re:Interesting patent history by scott1853 · · Score: 2

    I think maybe PhysicsGenius may not be 100% accurate, but I don't think he's trolling.

    Here's a quote from an article claiming that this quote was a response from a patent officer about the patent application from Leo Szilard, which was applied for in 1928:

    "Patents can be given only for inventions that permit a commercial use. However, the submitted procedure apparently has only a scientific value. Whether, in accordance with the invention, any commercially useful material can be produced by accelerating artificially- produced positively-charged corpuscles, appears from our present knowledge ruled out. In the whole application, no hint is found that the applicant has produced, or can produce, such material. Obviously the yield would be so tiny, as with atomic disintegration from the natural alpha rays of radioactive substances, that even in the future the prospect of using the invention in commerce has the highest degree of improbability.

    So it was initially rejected, maybe not for the same reason the parent though, but the patent office gave him a hard time about getting the parent.

    Moderators, please mod the parent of my post down as a troll. You can mod me as informative though ;)

  59. Moustache protector looks familiar by mikewas · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The moustache protector looks familiar. My father used to have one. It was issued to him when he was "requested" to join the German Army as it rolled through Hungary at the end of WW2.

    The company commander sported a goatee & a long moustache. He made the facial hair a part of the uniform for his men. Troops had to keep the moustaches trained, they had to have the proper upward curve, and protected at night. To accomplish this, they were all given a moustache protector that they were required to wear at night. They were taught during basic training to tie it just right to achieve the proper look.

    When my father got back home after the war, he threw his uniform, boots & everything else into the river. Somehow the moustache protector survived, travelling from Germany to Czechoslavakia where he barely survived an ambush, a POW camp in Poland, back home to Hungary, to East Germany, West Germany, and finally to the US.

    --

    "Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever." --Napoleon Bonaparte
  60. That was on the BBC two weeks ago. by chrestomanci · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...And I tried to submit a story about it at the time. I guess jonerik has more luck than me.

    My origonal submission, I think it is still relevant:

    The UK Patent Office celibates it's 150 year anniversary this week.

    A BBC Radio news show has decided to commemorate this by holding a poll of the public's favourite, and least favourite inventions of the last 150 years. The poll closes on Monday 21 October, so vote now.

    In the radio item on the subject, the inventor James Dyson (of vacuum cleaner fame) was interviewed (text, audio), and gave his favourite and least favourite inventions. There was also an interview of the patent office's director of copyright

    It is interesting to note that James Dyson chose to highlight as his favourite invention the example of Rubber vulcanisation where (in his opinion) the patent system failed because the inventor Charles Goodyear was refused a patent and died in poverty despite the value of his invention.

    1. Re:That was on the BBC two weeks ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The UK Patent Office [patent.gov.uk] celibates it's 150 year anniversary [patent.gov.uk] this week.

      Seems odd to abstain from sex just because your organisation is 150 years old...

  61. England ALSO salutes St. Crispin's Day! by Viking+Coder · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It's also St. Crispin's Day! The day made famous by Shakespeare's Henry V.

    WESTMORELAND.
    O that we now had here
    But one ten thousand of those men in England
    That do no work to-day!

    KING.
    What's he that wishes so?
    My cousin Westmoreland? No, my fair cousin.
    If we are mark'd to die, we are enow
    To do our country loss; and if to live,
    The fewer men, the greater share of honour.
    God's will! I pray thee, wish not one man more.
    By Jove, I am not covetous for gold,
    Nor care I who doth feed upon my cost;
    It yearns me not if men my garments wear;
    Such outward things dwell not in my desires;
    But if it be a sin to covet honour,
    I am the most offending soul alive.
    No, faith, my coz, wish not a man from England.
    God's peace! I would not lose so great an honour
    As one man more, methinks, would share from me
    For the best hope I have. O, do not wish one more!
    Rather proclaim it, Westmoreland, through my host,
    That he which hath no stomach to this fight,
    Let him depart. His passport shall be made,
    And crowns for convoy put into his purse.
    We would not die in that man's company
    That fears his fellowship to die with us.
    This day is call'd the feast of Crispian.
    He that outlives this day, and comes safe home,
    Will stand a tip-toe when this day is named,
    And rouse him at the name of Crispian.
    He that shall live this day, and see old age,
    Will yearly on the vigil feast his neighbours,
    And say, "To-morrow is Saint Crispian."
    Then will he strip his sleeve and show his scars,
    And say, "These wounds I had on Crispian's day."
    Old men forget; yet all shall be forgot,
    But he'll remember with advantages
    What feats he did that day. Then shall our names,
    Familiar in his mouth as household words,
    Harry the King, Bedford, and Exeter,
    Warwick and Talbot, Salisbury and Gloucester,
    Be in their flowing cups freshly rememb'red.
    This story shall the good man teach his son;
    And Crispin Crispian shall ne'er go by,
    From this day to the ending of the world,
    But we in it shall be remembered,
    We few, we happy few, we band of brothers.
    For he to-day that sheds his blood with me
    Shall be my brother; be he ne'er so vile,
    This day shall gentle his condition;
    And gentlemen in England now a-bed
    Shall think themselves accurs'd they were not here,
    And hold their manhoods cheap whiles any speaks
    That fought with us upon Saint Crispin's day.

    --
    Education is the silver bullet.
  62. Unuseless Japanese Inventions by Kikaid. · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The Japanese have managed to publish 3 books focusing on whacky inventions. They, however, refuse to admit to the whackiness, hence the title "Unuseless".

    --

    (This post does not contain emoticons or l337.)

  63. The most absurd invention is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the patent office itself!

  64. Re:Interesting patent history by Zathrus · · Score: 2

    Oh, he's trolling... just take a look at his posting history.

    Regarding Szilard's patent application - according to this page it's likely that his first patent on accelerators was rejected due to "prior art". Of course, file the same thing today and I bet you get a patent.

    From that page it's not clear if his cyclotron or betatron patents were granted or not.

    As for moderation - I didn't expect to get modded up. PG just deserves to get modded into a -1 hole.

  65. DRM, bio-chem etc... by oliverthered · · Score: 2

    There's always the idea of patenting 'evil' or 'world domination' techs to prevent Bill G, Monsanto etc... from taking over everything.
    e.g. Patent business models &co that you believe might exist in the future because of genetics, or DRM or advances in medine.

    That way you could charge a high license fee to the company if they don't sell there drugs etc... cheeply or don't generally toe the line. or just not let them pratice at all.

    Patents, keeping inovation alive!

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  66. Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You've got the UKians all up in arms defending their food with nary a word about their massively Big Brother-ish video cameras.

    GET SOME PRIORITIES, UKIANS!

    1. Re:Nice by Haer · · Score: 1

      Why should I care if im recorded walking down the street on a tape that has a tiny chance of even being watched?

    2. Re:Nice by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2

      Well, it will get watched if there is a sniper driving about killing people. Then they catch the guy before he kills double-digits.

  67. fish-n-chips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well if the'd have tightened up export restrictions on the US and had a propper trade war ' yes you will die!' then maybe you'd have had some propper british food, not some of that imported american crap.

  68. Another game (off topic) by drunkahol · · Score: 1

    I don't remember that game, but does ANYONE remember Agri Cup???? ... ...

    no?

    Thought not - Boooo

  69. sturgeon and friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    According to Steve van Dulken, who oversees the patent archive at the British Library, 'For every 100 applications lodged, I'd say that 10 are a bit whacky.' And, of course, the other 90 are crap :)

  70. Herbert Arthur Kershaw. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least, I think that was his name. Ring any bells for anyone ?

  71. Re:Interesting patent history by scott1853 · · Score: 1

    Damn, I got trolled. I feel so dirty now. Now there's a noticable red sphere next to his name so I'll know better next time.

  72. Re:Why do Brits have disgusting teeth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I've yet to meet a former GB'er here in the states that has that type of problem (maybe just the typical teeth problems

    Free dental care and treatment up to the age of 16 for everyone always helps.

  73. This site clears this topic up quite nicely by linderdm · · Score: 2
  74. Not a bad idea? by phorm · · Score: 2

    This doesn't sound hugely idiotic. Attaching a few mini-turbines on locations where wind-resistance and/or drag are high anyways might actually work. Putting one on the roof would add drag, putting on somewhere near or just in your front grill shouldn't add any resistance that isn't already there.

    I was actually thinking of this whilst noticing a bicycle wheel spinning quite quickly - probably due to air flow (on a hitch behind the vehicle, where wind is not really significant. I've been considering designing a fan/capacitor array to generate power and seeing how much it would make, any reasons why this shouldn't work?

    1. Re:Not a bad idea? by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 1
      This doesn't sound hugely idiotic.

      Yes it does.

      I've been considering designing a fan/capacitor array to generate power and seeing how much it would make, any reasons why this shouldn't work?

      Because the power generated will be less than the power required to overcome the drag.

      Second law of thermodynamics: you can't break even.

      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
    2. Re:Not a bad idea? by donutello · · Score: 5, Informative

      You're wrong. Any power you can generate from this will cause at least as much drag - probably more because of the inevitable inefficiencies of generating and distributing power.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    3. Re:Not a bad idea? by phorm · · Score: 2

      All that wind already pushing on the boxy front end of my 88 Toyota isn't likely going to increased a lot by adding a few fan-like turbines. At least not the amount I would need to power some low-end electronics?

    4. Re:Not a bad idea? by donutello · · Score: 2

      All that wind already pushing on the boxy front end of my 88 Toyota isn't likely going to increased a lot by adding a few fan-like turbines. At least not the amount I would need to power some low-end electronics?

      It will cost you at least as much in drag as you will generate from those turbines. You will be much better off just sticking a dynamo somewhere along the transmission. It will still cost you in power but won't be as inefficient as those turbines.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    5. Re:Not a bad idea? by alphatool · · Score: 0

      Dude, Its funny. Laugh.

  75. I have this game! by brunes69 · · Score: 2

    You are correct, it is called the Inventors. Some of these inventions don't look that crazy when compared to things like Onc Click SHopping though :)

  76. The designers must have been Paranoia freaks by Zinho · · Score: 1

    You know, I laughed pretty hard when I read the Tac-Nuke specs in the Paranoia manual. And someone actually built one? And DEPLOYED it? Your link said that this was sent to the field for actual combat!

    I'm just glad none of my relatives were in field artillery...

    --
    "Space Exploration is not endless circles in low earth orbit." -Buzz Aldrin
  77. I've searched and searched.... by solostring · · Score: 1

    .... through the links in the story, yet I can't seem to find PanIP talked about anywhere :)

  78. Re:Interesting patent history by L.+VeGas · · Score: 2

    He may be trolling, but he's one of the best I've seen. This man puts more effort into his posts than the vast majority of /. 'ers. This is satire at it's finest. Now you might not care for wit, and you might mod him down, but some of us look forward to his posts. A cursory glance tells me that he has roughly twice the fans you do.

  79. MODERATE PARENT REDUNDANT - NOTHING NEW HERE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  80. Take Our Word by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 1

    That should be "Take Our Word", not "Take Our World"! The link is right anyway.

    --

    If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
  81. Wacky?? by CharlieO · · Score: 1

    At least I don't live the side of the pond where they patented the swing as a jok (funny) and one-click-shopping (not funny) Mind you I guess we had a technological society going for longer, not that we are doing toooo welll these days....

  82. Re:Interesting patent history by Zathrus · · Score: 2

    Yes, and he has roughly 20 times or so the number of foes I do. Would've been ~30x, but you just became my 3rd freak. Shrug.

    I enjoy wit. I enjoy satire. PG has a poor grasp of them.

    If his posts were modded up as Funny (which they occasionally are) then that'd be one thing. But there's a whole lot of idiot mods out there that mod them up as insightful/informative.

  83. Re:Interesting patent history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you ever considered that those that do are trolling you through moderation?

    It's a lot less work than what PG usually posts, but judging by your response it's just as effective.

  84. Re:Interesting patent history by L.+VeGas · · Score: 2

    Well, I agree with your point about the idiot mods.
    However, I disagree that PG has poor grasp of satire, and it may be a little rude, but I can't help but laugh when I see him modded up for being informative.
    You might think his jokes are disruptive to the discussions, and based on his karma and number of freaks, you may be right, but hey, he makes me laugh. His description of why we see things in 3D (the longer it takes light to reach your eyes, the further away objects appear) is about the funniest pseudo-scientific explanation I've ever read.
    Guess all I'm really saying is he does a good job, and I hope he keeps it up.

  85. what, like BT? by kilonad · · Score: 1

    What do they mean by eccentric? Is that like BT patenting hyperlinks? ;)

  86. But 1 of 10 is more consistent than 10 of 100... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    10 inventions fails to cover complete lunar cycle, mad inventor eats invisible corpuscle, grows into giant cyclotron belch, throwing blender/toaster circuit breaker. YOU LOSE!

    Next Enemy) Mr. Ha Ha Toilet Mouth

  87. Etymologies by einhverfr · · Score: 2

    England was the land of the "Anglo-Saxons."

    Britain is from the Welsh name for Wales-- "Prydain" (pro: PRU-dain). Etym is O. W. Prydain -> L. Britanium -> Mid. Eng: Britaygne (however you want to spell it). -> Mod. Eng. Britain.

    UK is short for "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland."

    As for those wacky English, though-- I have a cousin near London who says that Oracle owns a mansion near there with a sizable park around it. He imagines that someone from Oracle US told some one from Oracle UK that "We need to buy some real estate: and so they went and bought a real estate...

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  88. Use existing drag-points by phorm · · Score: 2

    I'm not talking about powering the car off of this however, that would be dumb. Using it to power a capacitor array for some low-consumption internal electronics might be useful however.

    Because the power generated will be less than the power required to overcome the drag.

    If you read my original post, you will see that I was talking about using turbines, etc at points where drag is already there, so adding something to take advantage of it probably won't add to it overly.

    Unless you've got a superstreamlined nearly drag-free car. Mine's an 88 Corolla, old boxy design, the front end catches wind like a reverse sail at times...

    Second law of slashdot: read the damn post fully, think a few times, then hit "Submit" - phorm

    1. Re:Use existing drag-points by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 1
      If you read my original post, you will see that I was talking about using turbines, etc at points where drag is already there, so adding something to take advantage of it probably won't add to it overly.

      The only way this can work is if you first reduce the existing drag, then add the turbine for a net change of zero. TANSTAAFL. "Ye canna change the laws of physics!"

      It'd be more efficient to just reduce the drag, and power whatever it is you want to power off the car's internal electrical system. Really, what is it on a car that needs such little power and is in a place where you can't run wiring?

      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
    2. Re:Use existing drag-points by phorm · · Score: 1

      Really, what is it on a car that needs such little power and is in a place where you can't run wiring?

      Many things that just wouldn't be as fun to run from a customized cap array.

  89. Mod parent up!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bullshit this is a troll. It's informative as heck. Just cos some insecure American felt this hurt his/her sense of national pride and self worth, doesn't make this any less true.

  90. Oh, I know!!! by chip_s_ahoy · · Score: 1

    A jump to conclusions mat!

    "That is the most terrible idea I have ever heard."

  91. Ummm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They got nothin' on us United Stateians. We even have the method for swing on a swing patented.

  92. when will you guys get it-it's Britain not England by grouchal · · Score: 0

    duh!

  93. USA! USA! USA! by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 2


    "Ahhhh, those Brits might have the lock on bizarre and useless patents. AHHHHH, but now that the internet is around, lets see how they fare with the combined eeeeevil of the US Patent Office! MuuuUUUUAAAAaaahhhaahahahaha!"

    "FIRE THE EULA BEAM! NOW! NOW! I TELL YOU!"