Someones got time travel messed up with quantum computing again. Creating universes is all fun, but bolx. 1: Qauntum computer using the ossilation of molicules, each bit adds a resonance frequency to the molicule, so a wiggle on the input can produce lots of wobbles on the output,giving you lots of results at the same time. e.g. you can add/subtract/and or not multiply and devide all at the same time. (not quite a load of universes, more a sea of operations with the results being the waves)
2: Using the spins of things. This gives you a very efficient base 3 system, but probably doesnt do any magical inter universe stuff. The problem here is that it's more or less unuseable, so you apply the technique accross molicules (see point 1)
Re:Notes on quantum computing...
on
Future Computers
·
· Score: 1
Qauntum is base three not base two? top left, up down , strange and charmed. this enables you to represent 1 and 0 at the same time (but not 1 0 and -1) or whatever you'd have in a base 3 system. so you can still encrypt.
Shouldn't the RIAA &co get slamed
on
KaZaA Collapses
·
· Score: 1
Surly there's a country somewhere where this kind of activity (suing someone until they break, even though you might not have a leg to stand on) is illegal. Isn't this equivalent to racketeering or something.
I don't think I've every worked for a company that puts up real FAQ's, there all made up. ok so after a few months prohaps a couple of propper FAQ's appear but things like, 'How can I best leverage Microsofts licensing scheme to send my soul to heven' etc... shouldn't make the FAQ list.
If my service provider went to NAT's, I would screem at them to upgrade there networks to IPV6 so that they had no excuses to NAT me when IPV6 is commonplace.
Boy we sure did get the best hand in the deal when we got you to sign that. Thank god i have no reason whatsoever to go the the fachist hell hole that is the USA.
Well i kinda have certs for those things, DSDM certifitation this is kinda a mix of team work and project/time management. And MKII Function Point analysis,
Both certificates are about breaking down larger problems into managable chunks, this makes it far easier to comunicate your approach and any queries you have.
Of corse the both crap and any idiot can get certified.
What do you think the stuck on the rocket, Somthing to braodcast an AV feed back to earth. Oh common your not even trying to convince me.
Answer this, If it is oh so easy to land on the moon (only took a few years, and quite a few prople have done it). Why have there been two space stations but no luna base, it's got to be a lot easier to build somthing on the moon, after all there's loads of natural resources, a bit of graverty and probably easier to get somthing to land there (e.g. food) than sit in a convient orbit for a space station.
Mini zero? G experenents could be sent from the moon, and lower G experaments could be done on the moon. The earths graverty coupled with the rotation of the moon might result in some strange G's too.
If you're frightened that the russians might invade, don't worry just take you microwave out into the street and zap them with you ray gun..... Ohh thats a good idea, mod a few microwaves into a ray gun.
Re: if we didn't, they sure had NASA fooled
on
China Plans Moonbase
·
· Score: 1
You may also find yourself reviewing someone elses code and screaming the roof down trying to understand it, or printing it out and reading it before bed time, because it's so butifully written. This is by fay the best way to get people to write nice code, and you also pick up things along the way.
Re: if we didn't, they sure had NASA fooled
on
China Plans Moonbase
·
· Score: 1
No, The foil hat turns the electros emmited from a TV screen into X-Rays of course, don't you know anything. They are then focused (using a secret X-Ray focusing technique) onto my X-Ray glasses so that i can see through all of your devious trickery
The best commented code is the code that is commented on 'By Others', When they ask who what the hells going on, you should be writing clearer code. When they tell you 'This ways better', you should listen. When they tell you 'Theres a buffer overrun' you can fix it. When they tell you 'Theres a back door left in IE version 5 that allows Bill G to own your soul' you should use open source software.
Land at the apolo sites and prove once and for all wether the americans managed to land there first? I've see the pictures and they look a bit dodgy to me
I have a remote on My TV card and My Sound card, it's about time that someone designed a standard IR remote interface for the computer, with a sensible API then i could use one remote and controle evrything, on windows / linux/ freebsd. instead of having some crappy remotes that are useless.
whats more you should be able to connect it to the TV, HIFI , DVD player, Video Recorder, TV in the kitchen. I dream of the day when I can have one remote:- {{prefrable radio, digital and with a 128bit key that i can use to turn the overn off when i wan't a few extra pints down the pub}}, shit i've woken up again, never mind.
Or super conductiors, Maybe they demonstrated it on a small scale, (a few attoms) which shouldn't be that hard, but on a large scale the qauntum plot gets a bit lost
Slashdot Mirror
Someones got time travel messed up with quantum computing again.
Creating universes is all fun, but bolx.
1: Qauntum computer using the ossilation of molicules, each bit adds a resonance frequency to the molicule, so a wiggle on the input can produce lots of wobbles on the output,giving you lots of results at the same time. e.g. you can add/subtract/and or not multiply and devide all at the same time. (not quite a load of universes, more a sea of operations with the results being the waves)
2: Using the spins of things.
This gives you a very efficient base 3 system, but probably doesnt do any magical inter universe stuff. The problem here is that it's more or less unuseable, so you apply the technique accross molicules (see point 1)
Qauntum is base three not base two?
top left, up down , strange and charmed.
this enables you to represent 1 and 0 at the same time (but not 1 0 and -1) or whatever you'd have in a base 3 system. so you can still encrypt.
Surly there's a country somewhere where this kind of activity (suing someone until they break, even though you might not have a leg to stand on) is illegal.
Isn't this equivalent to racketeering or something.
Well thats just plane obvious and shouldn't need pointing out.
Sorry to point this out,
but there's nothing to heat up in space.
I don't think I've every worked for a company that puts up real FAQ's, there all made up. ok so after a few months prohaps a couple of propper FAQ's appear but things like,
'How can I best leverage Microsofts licensing scheme to send my soul to heven' etc... shouldn't make the FAQ list.
Stik the cert on a floppy and post it to them (charge a nominal amount for the P&P).
At least you can say in your defence, they were at this address, then you find them yourself.
At least there being honest about there evilness
i think Windows XP supports IPv6 by default, and windows 2000 supports it.
NAT's also means that you need less global address space, which makes things a bit cheeper to run.
Content should be signed, and certificates provided by the network.
Signing something says, I have given my permission to.... This places responsibility on someone for any copyright violations.
The network operators can kinda identify who they issued the certificate to.
Digitally signing provides a checksum.
If my service provider went to NAT's, I would screem at them to upgrade there networks to IPV6 so that they had no excuses to NAT me when IPV6 is commonplace.
Boy we sure did get the best hand in the deal when we got you to sign that. Thank god i have no reason whatsoever to go the the fachist hell hole that is the USA.
I could make a vacume cleaner that blows and works too.
Try blowing between two pieces of paper and see the 'sucking' effect of the turbulance.
Well i kinda have certs for those things,
DSDM certifitation this is kinda a mix of team work and project/time management.
And
MKII Function Point analysis,
Both certificates are about breaking down larger problems into managable chunks, this makes it far easier to comunicate your approach and any queries you have.
Of corse the both crap and any idiot can get certified.
the story on your userlan link is a bad example. Why?
Because Paul has potnetially violated Kirks alleged copyright on the syntax, this was then used by Richard.
Paul has allowed Richard to use somthing which he may not hold copyright to, this is a clasic example of piracy by proxy.
What do you think the stuck on the rocket,
Somthing to braodcast an AV feed back to earth.
Oh common your not even trying to convince me.
Answer this,
If it is oh so easy to land on the moon (only took a few years, and quite a few prople have done it).
Why have there been two space stations but no luna base, it's got to be a lot easier to build somthing on the moon, after all there's loads of natural resources, a bit of graverty and probably easier to get somthing to land there (e.g. food) than sit in a convient orbit for a space station.
Mini zero? G experenents could be sent from the moon, and lower G experaments could be done on the moon. The earths graverty coupled with the rotation of the moon might result in some strange G's too.
If you're frightened that the russians might invade, don't worry just take you microwave out into the street and zap them with you ray gun.....
Ohh thats a good idea, mod a few microwaves into a ray gun.
I have no fillings, becausae i have no teath.
You may also find yourself reviewing someone elses code and screaming the roof down trying to understand it, or printing it out and reading it before bed time, because it's so butifully written. This is by fay the best way to get people to write nice code, and you also pick up things along the way.
No,
The foil hat turns the electros emmited from a TV screen into X-Rays of course, don't you know anything.
They are then focused (using a secret X-Ray focusing technique) onto my X-Ray glasses so that i can see through all of your devious trickery
But notably she dosn't say that they did go to the moon. The laughter is probably madness caused by the brainwashing they've been doing.
But they will build a great wall, visible to the eye from earth, to keep the clangers out.
The best commented code is the code that is commented on 'By Others',
When they ask who what the hells going on, you should be writing clearer code.
When they tell you 'This ways better', you should listen.
When they tell you 'Theres a buffer overrun' you can fix it.
When they tell you 'Theres a back door left in IE version 5 that allows Bill G to own your soul' you should use open source software.
Land at the apolo sites and prove once and for all wether the americans managed to land there first?
I've see the pictures and they look a bit dodgy to me
I have a remote on My TV card and My Sound card, it's about time that someone designed a standard IR remote interface for the computer, with a sensible API then i could use one remote and controle evrything, on windows / linux/ freebsd. instead of having some crappy remotes that are useless.
whats more you should be able to connect it to the TV, HIFI , DVD player, Video Recorder, TV in the kitchen. I dream of the day when I can have one remote:- {{prefrable radio, digital and with a 128bit key that i can use to turn the overn off when i wan't a few extra pints down the pub}},
shit i've woken up again, never mind.
Or super conductiors,
Maybe they demonstrated it on a small scale, (a few attoms) which shouldn't be that hard, but on a large scale the qauntum plot gets a bit lost