The more I think about that list, the more fond I am of the Mount & Blade series.
The world needs more sandbox games. One makes the story with freedom and imagination. Create a simulation and let it run, tweak the fun/boring/grinding elements.
Not always apathy though. Fear induced impotence has a great responsibility in lowering the odds of any resistance to authority. And for those who are bold even in the face of huge adversity, there's always surveillance followed by violence.
Don't you understand? One non-technical paragraph is enough for me to make a completely informed decision about what a group of scientists does.
I don't even have to have studied any of that because I can use a mixture of quick, logic, common sense and, If I feel really smart, maybe even google something.
President Obama pulled the plug Friday on negotiations that would have kept American troops in Iraq past the end of this year. CBS News national security correspondent David Martin reports the president's demand for immunity for U.S. troops stationed there was the dealbreaker.
It's not about Bush vs Obama, it's' about being represented and Obama does not represent the people who voted for him because his policies go the opposite way from his candidate promises.
It's not about R vs D. It's about trying to not get fucked for once.
PS: And it would be awesome if you cared a bit about the effects his policies inflict upon the rest of the world. Drone indiscriminate murders of innocent people are not only ignored but actively hidden against any accountability.
Even if you believe that, the end result is that you don't get what you were promised (and a continuation of the previous policies).
I'm not wondering WHY it didn't happen, I'm just saying it didn't. People who elected him were not adequately represented and this is an example of it.
anyway, I don't see any reason to get your hopes up either. Skepticism and history analysis has always been a healthy attitude.
I wasn't trying to dehumanize anyone. It probably got it mixed up thinking about the party (it) and the whole election mechanism.
If I said "he" instead, I fear someone would find a reason to tell me I'm the root of all our problems because I focus on Obama as a person when there's a whole party out there.
Addressing semantics and deriving negative intentions from them is useless. You can always do it.
Most people - if you ask them what they understand by 'free software' - will tell you 'software whose price tag is $0.00.' What Stallman calls 'gratis' (like we're living in the 16th century - the only reason I know what it means is that I once had to read Shakespeare). So when he insists on using a term that only confuses people, it's right to call him on it.
There's this language called spanish, you know...
Gratis = Free (no price) Libre = Free (freedom)
He might be looking for that lack of ambiguity when using the word.
And not just travel. He engages in and supports movements that align with what he preaches.
He gave a couple of talks in Argentina (in excellent spanish) recommending gnu/Linux for different purposes and helped a movement to include a distro (I think it was Ubuntu) alongside Windows on the government granted netbooks for schoolchildren (A very important nationwide program)
I'd think that Obama was a better example of the failures of apparent democracy.
His photo appears in the dictionary when you look for charisma or oratory but he ran on a platform of opposition to most of the things than by the "Other Party" and ended up maintaining very much the same policies in large scale (expanding many of those concerning civil liberties and foreign policy).
You had this option to oppose what Bush did. It said it would do things differently (in very specific terms). Once elected, it didn't.
Democracy doesn't work because we've developed the science of propaganda to a point where the amount of money you have is directly related to the odds of winning an election.
Slashdot Mirror
and have that be a script that runs every time you save a file, so it appends the appropriate amount of garbage based on the file length.
The problem is that, no matter what you do, practically any online presence will give them some justification to say you're under their jurisdiction.
and the solution seems to be to approve increased powers to kill the problem, be it in a literal or figurative sense.
I'm on a mobile device right now but can you point me on examples of such type of analysis that you'd consider credible?
The more I think about that list, the more fond I am of the Mount & Blade series.
The world needs more sandbox games. One makes the story with freedom and imagination. Create a simulation and let it run, tweak the fun/boring/grinding elements.
you're right. I mixed that up.
Not always apathy though. Fear induced impotence has a great responsibility in lowering the odds of any resistance to authority. And for those who are bold even in the face of huge adversity, there's always surveillance followed by violence.
What about IE9 mimicking Chrome?
He is right though. 7 words, all lowercase is to be frowned upon when you're allegedly knowledgeable about technology.
I do too. The thing that hurts those formats is the lack of hardware support on music devices.
Yeah, I couldn't help but roll my eyes when I read that.
excellent, now I'm absolutely convinced that I must read Feynman's book.
Don't you understand? One non-technical paragraph is enough for me to make a completely informed decision about what a group of scientists does.
I don't even have to have studied any of that because I can use a mixture of quick, logic, common sense and, If I feel really smart, maybe even google something.
And there seem to be some introductory courses from both Stanford's Coursera and Udacity (Sebatian Thrun's new start up).
They're programming oriented, if I'm not mistaken, though.
Do your research. Obama didn't want to get out.
It's not about Bush vs Obama, it's' about being represented and Obama does not represent the people who voted for him because his policies go the opposite way from his candidate promises.
It's not about R vs D. It's about trying to not get fucked for once.
PS: And it would be awesome if you cared a bit about the effects his policies inflict upon the rest of the world. Drone indiscriminate murders of innocent people are not only ignored but actively hidden against any accountability.
Even if you believe that, the end result is that you don't get what you were promised (and a continuation of the previous policies).
I'm not wondering WHY it didn't happen, I'm just saying it didn't. People who elected him were not adequately represented and this is an example of it.
anyway, I don't see any reason to get your hopes up either. Skepticism and history analysis has always been a healthy attitude.
I wasn't trying to dehumanize anyone. It probably got it mixed up thinking about the party (it) and the whole election mechanism.
If I said "he" instead, I fear someone would find a reason to tell me I'm the root of all our problems because I focus on Obama as a person when there's a whole party out there.
Addressing semantics and deriving negative intentions from them is useless. You can always do it.
overall, it was quite interesting. It reminds me of Scott Turow's novels.
There's this language called spanish, you know...
Gratis = Free (no price)
Libre = Free (freedom)
He might be looking for that lack of ambiguity when using the word.
And not just travel. He engages in and supports movements that align with what he preaches.
He gave a couple of talks in Argentina (in excellent spanish) recommending gnu/Linux for different purposes and helped a movement to include a distro (I think it was Ubuntu) alongside Windows on the government granted netbooks for schoolchildren (A very important nationwide program)
I'd think that Obama was a better example of the failures of apparent democracy.
His photo appears in the dictionary when you look for charisma or oratory but he ran on a platform of opposition to most of the things than by the "Other Party" and ended up maintaining very much the same policies in large scale (expanding many of those concerning civil liberties and foreign policy).
You had this option to oppose what Bush did. It said it would do things differently (in very specific terms). Once elected, it didn't.
Democracy doesn't work because we've developed the science of propaganda to a point where the amount of money you have is directly related to the odds of winning an election.
I bet you're offended by the FreeBSD logo as well.
Steve Hughes: Offended
Soon, they wanted to release for April 1st but got delayed... Soon.
Till then, as others have said, there's the Release Candidate.
And Blender *must* be a mimic of 3dStudio and Maya...
Happy Blender, Thunderbird, LibreOffice and Gimp users everywhere disagree.
There's a Single Window mode already.