1. attacking pornography in the general sense is not the same as attacking a singular race, gender, or religion.
2. the discussion is not about whether or not they would be sued, but whether or not their actions involved avoiding getting sued, and at what capacity.
again, why are you bringing up pornography? how is that relevant?
which one is more different? are either different enough?
considering jewogle.com utilizes google's services to make the site work, and completely ripped off 80% of the google logo unchanged, it's pretty obvious what you are suggesting did not happen.
did you graduate from college? if so, i see nothing wrong about the college professors entrusted with imparting an understanding of logic to you... you are absolutely correct.
when a government body is given vague empowerment with no checks or balances, all systems of justice are inherently undermined.
because you'd rather have your insurance agent get something wrong? would you rather your bill was wrong or your payment was wrong?
you'd rather the insurance company had to pay people to spend more time than is sufficient to get a job done, and then pay more people to fix the problems with the original employee's work? who do you think pays for those people? you want to pay higher premiums just so professionals don't have to think for themselves?
combating students cheating to obtain a degree to further empower individuals of sleeper cells could easily fall under the vague empowerment granted by the homeland security act... that is why it's dangerous and ignorant legislation.
your halfhearted statement of law without extrapolating it's potential to cover the very situation you are claiming could not be possible is fairly hypocritical and dickish.
perhaps you haven't heard of ad hoc networks.... even inside a faraday cage, as long as one student is willing to help others cheat, all students are capable of cheating.
certainly there is SOMEONE that wants to hear what i have to say... if not, why would you assume anyone would want to hear you say nothing except that i am not worth listening to? if no one wanted to read it, then why would you believe anyone would want to read your response? do you believe i'm forcing people to read what i write? i assure you, i'm not. believing otherwise would be believing that this is all some conspiracy where i have the power to control others... which again would be ignorant and hypocritical. by the way, the medium i'm utilizing is the written word, which is read, not heard... so whether or not anyone "wants to hear" is irrelevant... and as i'm writing and not speaking, you have not yet established i am even capable of saying anything, as i have said nothing. i'm beginning to lean towards your idiocy, moron.
perhaps SOMEONE ELSE YET is indifferent about reading what i write, but would rather wish OTHERS not to read what i write... "hearing what i have to say"... perhaps that someone or group of someones have something to gain by lying or misrepresenting facts and attempting to discredit others instead of providing facts of their own. perhaps you fall into that category, idiot.
i HAVE more accounts, because I CAN have more accounts. it's a flaw in the system. slashdot's moderation system is based on the assumption that 1 person = 1 user... limiting posting abilities and distributing moderation abilities so no one user has a "reign of terror"... yet they do ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to ensure 1 person = 1 user. until that obvious hole is closed, i will utilize the abilities it provides me. not doing so would be ignorant.
you are a coward that is unable to form an argument without taking a named god's name in vain, using top tier obscenities, referencing non-intercourse sex-acts with the female anatomy, and insulting the mentally handicapped... and then hypocritically claiming lessor acts are "mere childish insults."
you are NOTHING.
ur mum's face have the self-control of a retard at a petting zoo.
Slashdot Mirror
2. the discussion is not about whether or not they would be sued, but whether or not their actions involved avoiding getting sued, and at what capacity.
again, why are you bringing up pornography? how is that relevant?
how is that relevant?
considering jewogle.com utilizes google's services to make the site work, and completely ripped off 80% of the google logo unchanged, it's pretty obvious what you are suggesting did not happen.
what do you think a jew would do?
slashdot is run by liars who would attempt to sell you things using statements they suspect they'll NEVER agree with.
pathetic.
slashdot = stagnated.
post your address... or are you afraid of the repercussions of your actions?
action without responsibility is not action.
you're an idiot.
ur mum's face is a piece of shit
when a government body is given vague empowerment with no checks or balances, all systems of justice are inherently undermined.
you'd rather the insurance company had to pay people to spend more time than is sufficient to get a job done, and then pay more people to fix the problems with the original employee's work? who do you think pays for those people? you want to pay higher premiums just so professionals don't have to think for themselves?
your halfhearted statement of law without extrapolating it's potential to cover the very situation you are claiming could not be possible is fairly hypocritical and dickish.
perhaps you haven't heard of ad hoc networks.... even inside a faraday cage, as long as one student is willing to help others cheat, all students are capable of cheating.
perhaps SOMEONE ELSE YET is indifferent about reading what i write, but would rather wish OTHERS not to read what i write... "hearing what i have to say"... perhaps that someone or group of someones have something to gain by lying or misrepresenting facts and attempting to discredit others instead of providing facts of their own. perhaps you fall into that category, idiot.
i HAVE more accounts, because I CAN have more accounts. it's a flaw in the system. slashdot's moderation system is based on the assumption that 1 person = 1 user... limiting posting abilities and distributing moderation abilities so no one user has a "reign of terror"... yet they do ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to ensure 1 person = 1 user. until that obvious hole is closed, i will utilize the abilities it provides me. not doing so would be ignorant.
you are a coward that is unable to form an argument without taking a named god's name in vain, using top tier obscenities, referencing non-intercourse sex-acts with the female anatomy, and insulting the mentally handicapped... and then hypocritically claiming lessor acts are "mere childish insults."
you are NOTHING.
ur mum's face have the self-control of a retard at a petting zoo.