one problem, i see with their subscription model is the quality of service. i mean look at napster now, most of the songs you download are missing some bytes at the beginning or at the end or have little sound glitches in them. thats ok as long as its free but no one is gonna pay for broken mp3s.
in their chart they dont even have a price listed for the 1,13 gig intel. so how can they tell its the worst bang for the buck if they dont even know how much it costs??
maybe one reason linux does so well in this survey is that puretec (germanys second biggest provider) which hosts about 800.000 domains recently switched to linux.
Slashdot Mirror
one problem, i see with their subscription model is the quality of service. i mean look at napster now, most of the songs you download are missing some bytes at the beginning or at the end or have little sound glitches in them. thats ok as long as its free but no one is gonna pay for broken mp3s.
in their chart they dont even have a price listed for the 1,13 gig intel. so how can they tell its the worst bang for the buck if they dont even know how much it costs??
maybe one reason linux does so well in this survey is that puretec (germanys second biggest provider) which hosts about 800.000 domains recently switched to linux.
if anyone is interested theres an even more detailed figure in steve albinis rant here about what the artist actually gets at the end