there is no overcoming true assuredness... you are denying the existence of a true MAD situation and instead countering a perceived potential threat. such countering actions could very well trigger the destruction you are acting to eliminate.
Who in their worst nightmares would could have thought that anyone could stoop to do what he did?
the "would could could" aside.... REALLY? in your WORST nightmares people aren't stooping low enough to commit homicide? no physical harm at all? a tarnished reputation later exonerated by a judge is your WORST nightmare? why do you think passwords exist? because accessing your account is something someone might do... having the password already acknowledges this threat...
i feel no remorse for a victim who would hypocritically exaggerate the truth to the media and attempt to exploit their reach to create more sympathy for yourself and more hatred towards the already convicted offender. you can't have it both ways. if you want to whine about someone using the media, don't turn your back and do the exact same thing with your own exaggerated hypotheticals.
how is this for a nightmare: what do you think this guy is going to do when he gets out in 12 years?
as you continue to fail to muster the courage to reveal yourself, i find it ignorant and hypocritical that you would claim my assertion is false without simply revealing yourself to find out for sure. you enjoy being a coward and saying things as a coward would and never holding any responsibility for you actions? you don't think i can find you?
keep speculating, coward.... OR present yourself to me, admit what you've done, AND I WILL KILL YOU.
is that including the transmission delay of the instruction pipeline? i agree 40ms is extremely usable for full duplex. right now i'm content with 250-300ms for one way live broadcasting with interactive chat.
what i'd really like is the highest quality video recording you can muster of you in an environment with 2 computers, one with a mic and one with a speaker... film yourself transcoding. i fully understand the DSP chip implementation should be better in terms of latency, but the quality of signal will probably not be any better, and will likely be worse as compromises are made to fit the chip architecture... i understand the limits of advertising TVs in a newspaper... but even youtube pretty accurately portrays a recorded environment.
you're wrong... codecs help with latency using throttling. you might argue, as many do, that the side effects and increased state data requirements aren't worth it... others would argue, as many do, that the decreased latency is vital.
i don't care either way, as i stated before i have no need for this, and if a need ever did arrive, like bruce said, i can just type "make on linux".
right now i broadcast 24/7 from my home full 720p with rich audio and there is about.3 seconds delay on the signal. all free codecs.
i'm talking about a specific issue: changing the finite state machine the drives the data model. when you have 1000 conditional triggers and they can all trigger 1000s of other conditional triggers, and now you want to drastically change a single reaching procedure which will conditionally trigger 1000s of triggers.
now you're asked to update that procedure drastically uprooting the order and correctness of all existing triggers... are you going to trace all those triggers to edit them, or would you rather have blocks of procedural code driving the entire process in one place?
who did regression testing on the regression test architects? i've built systems in and out of lead roles using both methodologies... the problem isn't your way won't work... it's that you don't understand any better ways to do the same thing easier with equal or better results in any measurable category. i do understand such ways.
Slashdot Mirror
you are NOTHING.
there is no overcoming true assuredness... you are denying the existence of a true MAD situation and instead countering a perceived potential threat. such countering actions could very well trigger the destruction you are acting to eliminate.
by Anonymous Coward
nope. still you.
i am not attempting anything by stating a fact. i am simply stating a fact.
you're an idiot.
you are NOTHING
Who in their worst nightmares would could have thought that anyone could stoop to do what he did?
the "would could could" aside.... REALLY? in your WORST nightmares people aren't stooping low enough to commit homicide? no physical harm at all? a tarnished reputation later exonerated by a judge is your WORST nightmare? why do you think passwords exist? because accessing your account is something someone might do... having the password already acknowledges this threat...
i feel no remorse for a victim who would hypocritically exaggerate the truth to the media and attempt to exploit their reach to create more sympathy for yourself and more hatred towards the already convicted offender. you can't have it both ways. if you want to whine about someone using the media, don't turn your back and do the exact same thing with your own exaggerated hypotheticals.
how is this for a nightmare: what do you think this guy is going to do when he gets out in 12 years?
tell pee hook to straighten his dick.
you are NOTHING
you are NOTHING
keep speculating, coward.... OR present yourself to me, admit what you've done, AND I WILL KILL YOU.
you are NOTHING
what i'd really like is the highest quality video recording you can muster of you in an environment with 2 computers, one with a mic and one with a speaker... film yourself transcoding. i fully understand the DSP chip implementation should be better in terms of latency, but the quality of signal will probably not be any better, and will likely be worse as compromises are made to fit the chip architecture... i understand the limits of advertising TVs in a newspaper... but even youtube pretty accurately portrays a recorded environment.
you are NOTHING
or statistician misrepresents the truth?
you are NOTHING
ur mum's face can post any random link to xkcd and get modded up on slashdot
the problem is lack of sanitization.
ur mum's face is the fucking idiot now.
you are NOTHING
ur mum's face might even be able to slice butter
you can't disagree with contracts that require such sequential processing.
ur mum's face often conduct arguments at a 2nd-grade level with figments of your imagination
sanitization of the sanitation.
you're still talking about input sanitation... further demonstrating my point that MOST DEVELOPERS DON'T UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCE.
the tradeoffs are trivial... quality of signal vs everything else
i don't care either way, as i stated before i have no need for this, and if a need ever did arrive, like bruce said, i can just type "make on linux".
right now i broadcast 24/7 from my home full 720p with rich audio and there is about .3 seconds delay on the signal. all free codecs.
now you're asked to update that procedure drastically uprooting the order and correctness of all existing triggers... are you going to trace all those triggers to edit them, or would you rather have blocks of procedural code driving the entire process in one place?
who did regression testing on the regression test architects? i've built systems in and out of lead roles using both methodologies... the problem isn't your way won't work... it's that you don't understand any better ways to do the same thing easier with equal or better results in any measurable category. i do understand such ways.
you are NOTHING
you are NOTHING