Still, any height at which an airplane staying aloft by aerodynamic forces and using an air-breathing engine can operate has to be described as part of the atmosphere.
70 years ago was 1941. Things like atoms were only suspected. (the atom bomb is less than 70 years old.)
Um, no. The modern conception of the atom (but not its internal structure) was well-known by the middle of the nineteenth century, having been first propounded by John Dalton in 1808. The internal structure of electrons, neutrons and protons was first sketched out by Rutherford in 1911, refined by Bohr in 1913 and improved to the current quantum model by Pauli and Schroedinger in 1925-1926. The atom bomb dates back to only 1945 but was the result of years of work, and the basic theory grounding it pre-dates it by decades.
What country are you from? In the US, calculus is largely regarded as college-level work. Advanced Placement courses might see basic calculus in high school; you almost never see it even then before 11th grade (16 to 17 years old).
Actually, yes, most fundamentalists believe you will be naked in Heaven. However, there will be no lascivious thoughts because that sort of nastiness just doesn't happen in Heaven.
Calculator apps can be had for Androids, tablets, *and* netbooks. People are not going to spend money and cart around an extra piece of junk that's only a calculator. And they don't.
Surely, it wouldn't cripple TI to make models that aren't intended for the limited purpose of taking tests.
And those models would be intended for...what, exactly? What purpose does a TI calculator serve these days that could not be better served by an Android phone, a tablet, or a netbook? Calculators today are for people taking tests who are prohibited from having connected or truly capable devices. They have no other purpose.
And you have the right to make your own determination of what "made whole" means in your motion for redress.
Asking for 75 trillion dollars like the MAFIAA does from time to time just makes you look like an ass and discredits you in front of the judge and everyone else.
Yes, it does. They still have the right to make that motion. Neither the court nor anyone else can get redress from the RIAA/MPAA for making those motion.
This is unconscionable and should be laughed out of court by the judge and it should come with an attached letter from the judge saying "next time, don't use crayon to write motions."
Pretty much, yeah. Having the right to make such a motion does mean that the motion will be granted or even that it's a good idea to make such a motion; severe overreach is likely to tick off both the judge and the jury. I personally hope that the court's reaction to this will impress upon most lawyers that making such motions is not a good idea.
I have seen articles on DM talk about how intersolar and intergalactic dust clouds have been accounted for but I dont know 'how'.
Because we can *see* them. They have no light of their own, but they occlude the light sources behind them, changing it even though they may not block it completely. Whatever dark matter is, it is completely transparent to light over intergalactic distances (except for gravitational effects, but apparently it's diffuse enough that those aren't detectable). That's not possible with any form of "ordinary" matter.
We know about dark matter not through micro-lensing but because of galactic structure. Galaxies rotate. If all the mass there was in any given galaxy was just what we could see, the centrifugal force would tear apart immediately. The only way we can account for sufficient gravitational attraction to keep stars in their orbits around the galactic center is to assume a lot of mass we can't see--dark matter. Most calculations based on stellar orbits consistently come up with figures for dark matter of over 80% of the matter in the universe. There's more than four times as much dark matter as what we can see. And whatever dark matter is, it apparently is diffuse enough that we don't see it micro-lensing anything, and doesn't otherwise interact with light or other EM radiation, because we find no trace of it in the light that reaches earth from all corners of the universe; therefore it *can't* be ordinary matter as we understand it, because any form of ordinary matter in that quantity would produce detectable occlusion of the light sources behind it. So what is it? Answer that question and win a Nobel.
Do you realize how many people are out there who are *not* paying me $100 a day? This is outrageous and is costing me a lot of money! Something needs to be done about this, because everyone should be paying me $100 a day!
Slashdot Mirror
By your definition, there are a lot of consumer routers being sold *right now* that are "ten years obsolete" right out of the box.
Sure! "It's just a jump to the left, and then a step to the riiight..."
I agree. From now on, Wikipedia should only be in French and Japanese.
Repeat to yourself: It's just a kernel, I really should relax.
...the *power* of the dark side.
Still, any height at which an airplane staying aloft by aerodynamic forces and using an air-breathing engine can operate has to be described as part of the atmosphere.
It's not even *that* far up--most modern military jets can fly that high.
No, 668 is the Neighbor of the Beast. 667 is Across the Street From the Beast.
Then the Bible itself is a crock, since everybody who was alive in AD 50 (or whenever) is surely dead now.
Um, no. The modern conception of the atom (but not its internal structure) was well-known by the middle of the nineteenth century, having been first propounded by John Dalton in 1808. The internal structure of electrons, neutrons and protons was first sketched out by Rutherford in 1911, refined by Bohr in 1913 and improved to the current quantum model by Pauli and Schroedinger in 1925-1926. The atom bomb dates back to only 1945 but was the result of years of work, and the basic theory grounding it pre-dates it by decades.
What country are you from? In the US, calculus is largely regarded as college-level work. Advanced Placement courses might see basic calculus in high school; you almost never see it even then before 11th grade (16 to 17 years old).
Actually, yes, most fundamentalists believe you will be naked in Heaven. However, there will be no lascivious thoughts because that sort of nastiness just doesn't happen in Heaven.
"App store" is short for "Apple store"! Of *course* nobody else can use it! Not even if they're selling actual fruit!
There was this post on LinkedIn about how much money this was going to make for everybody!
You're buying only Kindle books, and paying the premium. That's how they justify that. Any other questions?
Calculator apps can be had for Androids, tablets, *and* netbooks. People are not going to spend money and cart around an extra piece of junk that's only a calculator. And they don't.
Right up to the point where we admit it was all bullshit.
And those models would be intended for...what, exactly? What purpose does a TI calculator serve these days that could not be better served by an Android phone, a tablet, or a netbook? Calculators today are for people taking tests who are prohibited from having connected or truly capable devices. They have no other purpose.
And you have the right to make your own determination of what "made whole" means in your motion for redress.
Yes, it does. They still have the right to make that motion. Neither the court nor anyone else can get redress from the RIAA/MPAA for making those motion.
Pretty much, yeah. Having the right to make such a motion does mean that the motion will be granted or even that it's a good idea to make such a motion; severe overreach is likely to tick off both the judge and the jury. I personally hope that the court's reaction to this will impress upon most lawyers that making such motions is not a good idea.
Lords of Light!
Because we can *see* them. They have no light of their own, but they occlude the light sources behind them, changing it even though they may not block it completely. Whatever dark matter is, it is completely transparent to light over intergalactic distances (except for gravitational effects, but apparently it's diffuse enough that those aren't detectable). That's not possible with any form of "ordinary" matter.
We know about dark matter not through micro-lensing but because of galactic structure. Galaxies rotate. If all the mass there was in any given galaxy was just what we could see, the centrifugal force would tear apart immediately. The only way we can account for sufficient gravitational attraction to keep stars in their orbits around the galactic center is to assume a lot of mass we can't see--dark matter. Most calculations based on stellar orbits consistently come up with figures for dark matter of over 80% of the matter in the universe. There's more than four times as much dark matter as what we can see. And whatever dark matter is, it apparently is diffuse enough that we don't see it micro-lensing anything, and doesn't otherwise interact with light or other EM radiation, because we find no trace of it in the light that reaches earth from all corners of the universe; therefore it *can't* be ordinary matter as we understand it, because any form of ordinary matter in that quantity would produce detectable occlusion of the light sources behind it. So what is it? Answer that question and win a Nobel.
Do you realize how many people are out there who are *not* paying me $100 a day? This is outrageous and is costing me a lot of money! Something needs to be done about this, because everyone should be paying me $100 a day!
You'd have trouble finding a doctor to agree to that. The ones that would agree to it wouldn't be ones I'd trust to take a knife to me.
Because nobody buys or plays on the Wii. Just look at their abysmal sales figures!