Slashdot Mirror


Volcano Erupts In Iceland

Reports are coming in that a volcano in Iceland called Grimsvotn has erupted, sending plumes of smoke 15km into the air. It was accompanied by a series of earthquakes, but all of them have been minor so far, and scientists don't believe the eruption will cause problems for air travel like 2010's Eyjafjallajokull event. Local coverage in Icelandic is available, as well as early pictures of the eruption.

191 comments

  1. Oh man... by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Funny

    We're all doomed! Repent! Then end is here! ... I still have time for the doomsday stuff right?

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
    1. Re:Oh man... by swabeui · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You know at least half the people over there had this thought cross their minds, "Shit, I hedged my bets wrong"

    2. Re:Oh man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're all doomed! Repent! Then end is here! ... I still have time for the doomsday stuff right?

      The world did end last night. This is all in your imagination. You are in a dream before death.

    3. Re:Oh man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wait, isn't saying "a volcano erupted in Iceland" like saying "a bag of rice fell over in China"?

      I mean come on, the whole thing is basically a set of the biggest active volcanoes on the whole fault line, with some grass on them.
      I say "some grass", because the rest is still dead land from the last giant magma flow.

    4. Re:Oh man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think people are a bit jumpy about the Icelandic volcanoes after Eyjafjallajökull halted significant portions of European air traffic last year, which is driving some extra media coverage.
      The current eruption is not expected to have much impact on air routes.

    5. Re:Oh man... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Funny

      You know at least half the people over there had this thought cross their minds, "Shit, I hedged my bets wrong"

      Hedging the bet was easy. I just hung around on the west side of a time zone division, watching to see whether anything happened on the east side. If people had started going up, I would have had an hour to get to church and get saved.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    6. Re:Oh man... by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, I really doubt that. 1) Icelanders are not idiots. 2) It's fucking Iceland. This is hardly the first time they've seen some volcanic activity.

      Had this been in biblebelt kansas, maybe you'd be right.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    7. Re:Oh man... by pjfontillas · · Score: 2

      Raptors! Raptors! Oh wait... that's not what we're talking about here... is it?

      --
      Life. Is. Good.
    8. Re:Oh man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You know that "chosen will be lifted to heaven" only means that they die instantly right? Blown up probably?

    9. Re:Oh man... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      No, I really doubt that. 1) Icelanders are not idiots.

      They started loads of dotbanks, took in shedloads of money as of deposits, then refused to pay any of it back.

      Idiots, no. Thieving bastards, yes.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    10. Re:Oh man... by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      Well aren't you a racist little piece of shit.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    11. Re:Oh man... by Zanadou · · Score: 1

      I think you need to look up the meaning of the word "racist"...

    12. Re:Oh man... by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      You think wrong. Making the sweeping generalization that everyone of a particular ethnicity are "Thieving bastards" is textbook racism.

      "According to the United Nations conventions, there is no distinction between the term racial discrimination and ethnicity discrimination."

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    13. Re:Oh man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iceland isn't a race, you dimwitted person.

    14. Re:Oh man... by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      Icelandic is an ethnicity you fucktarded moron.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
  2. Random chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even though this is purely coincidentally, all the believers of the May 21 "rapture" are going to cite this as evidence.

    1. Re:Random chance by Yo+Grark · · Score: 1

      Hey if they all flee to iceland, all the better for the rest of us*

      *iceland excluded.

      - Yo Grark

      --
      Canadian Bred with American Buttering
    2. Re:Random chance by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Even though this is purely coincidentally, all the believers of the May 21 "rapture" are going to cite this as evidence.

      Umm, if they're still 'here' after May 21st, all the evidence in the world isn't going to be very persuasive.

      And as a side note, what's with these weird Icelandic names? "Vatnajokull" sounds like something only a Scrabble fanatic would come up with.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:Random chance by norriefc · · Score: 1

      Even though this is purely coincidentally, all the believers of the May 21 "rapture" are going to cite this as evidence.

      Considering it is now almost 3 hours past the supposed rapture time I doubt it

    4. Re:Random chance by jd · · Score: 4, Funny

      You've got to remember that they're descended from the Vikings. If you look at the syllables in Vatnajokull, they're all something you could get out between sword swings. Evolution would have taken its course and all longer syllables would have died out.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    5. Re:Random chance by thaylin · · Score: 1

      Yea, but since they, and their leader was not taken, do you really think they will be happy about the rapture happening 8)

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    6. Re:Random chance by LoudNoiseElitist · · Score: 1

      What kinds of names are the supposed to have, Spanish? Chinese, perhaps?

    7. Re:Random chance by erroneus · · Score: 1, Funny

      They have cats that like to walk across their keyboards. That's just what happens...

    8. Re:Random chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you have too much faith in mankind.

    9. Re:Random chance by Uhyve · · Score: 1

      I think they just like giving journalists a hard time...

    10. Re:Random chance by Zomalaja · · Score: 1

      Note the link to the "Local coverage in Icelandic" - there is actually this sentence in it:
      "Hjörleifur sagði að búið væri að virkja viðbúnaðarkerfi. að er allt farið í gang eins og um gos sé að ræða. að er búið að senda viðvörun út til Englands annig að flugrekendur geti breytt flugi"
      "Vatnajokull" seems pretty ordinary now.

    11. Re:Random chance by Rei · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They'd hate it there. Remember, we're talking about a country that voted in same-sex marriage 49 to *zero*, and has a lesbian prime minister.

      --
      You're not made of Tuesday!
    12. Re:Random chance by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

      Even though this is purely coincidentally, all the believers of the May 21 "rapture" are going to cite this as evidence.

      Umm, if they're still 'here' after May 21st, all the evidence in the world isn't going to be very persuasive.

      You can bet that some will cite this as evidence that they had the date right, but God decided to let us off with a mild warning.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    13. Re:Random chance by geekoid · · Score: 4, Funny

      Is she hot?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    14. Re:Random chance by Rei · · Score: 2

      Why does Icelandic seem so weird to so many people here? It's more closely related to English than, say, Spanish. Norse branched off from the west Germanic languages (from which English mostly descended) around 200 AD (although the split started a few thousand years earlier). Icelandic is very similar to Old Norse.

      Vatnajökull is (in typical Icelandic fashion) the not-very-creatively-named "Water Glacier". Is it really that hard to see how "Vatn" and "Water" are related words? It's even easier to see the connections between Icelandic and German. For example, "Goðan dag" is a common Icelandic greeting.

      As for that sentence: I'm just a beginner at Icelandic, but here's my best:

      Hjörleifur: (A man's name)
      Sagði: Says
      að: That
      búið : Finished
      væri: Would have
      að virkja: Utilizing
      viðbúnaðarkerfi: Contingency system (literally, "preparedness system")

      * Hjörleifur says that they would have finished utilizing the contingency system

      að: That
      er: Is
      allt: Everything
      farið: Going
      gang: Running
      eins og: Like, in the manner of
      um: About
      gos: Eruption
      sé: See
      að ræða: At issue, under discussion

      * Everything is all going and running concerning the eruption being discussed

      að: That
      er: Is
      búið: Finished
      að senda: Sending
      *viðvörun: Warning
      út: Out
      til: To
      Englands: England (genitive)
      annig: So
      að: That
      flugrekendur: Flight operators
      geti: Can
      breytt: Change
      flugi: Flights

      * They've finished sending out a warning to England so that flight operators can change flights.

      Any native speakers, feel free to correct my translation ;) But the main point is, I'm sure you can see the connection to English in a number of those words. What is it about Icelandic that scares off people -- is it the eth (ð) and thorn ()? They're just a voiced and unvoiced "th" (as in "this" and "thin", respectively). We used to have them in English. æ is pronounced "aye", just like in Latin, ö is like the "eux" in the French "deux", au is like the French "oui", ll is like "tl", á is "ow", é and ý are "yeh", non-leading "g"s are usually more of a stop, "rn" is like "rdn", and beyond that, you'll probably guess pretty close to the right pronunciation.

      IMHO, the hardest parts about Icelandic are the rolled 'R's and the crazy-elaborate declension/conjugation system with all the exceptions ;)

      --
      You're not made of Tuesday!
    15. Re:Random chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All signs point to "no".

    16. Re:Random chance by Rei · · Score: 1

      Random side note: her name is Jóhanna Sigurðardóttir. Do you know the proper way to address her?

      "Jóhanna".

      You similarly address your teachers, elders, etc by first name. Even phone books in Iceland are sorted by first name. The "last name" is a patronymic -- "Sigurðardóttir" literally means that her father's name was Sigurðar.

      --
      You're not made of Tuesday!
    17. Re:Random chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will she settle for lesbominister?

    18. Re:Random chance by Rei · · Score: 1

      Should a straight person go by "breederminister"? I mean, it's such a stupid joke.

      --
      You're not made of Tuesday!
    19. Re:Random chance by Rei · · Score: 1

      Actually, I probably should get myself out of the habit of translating buinn & similar as "finished" and simply use the past tense....

      --
      You're not made of Tuesday!
    20. Re:Random chance by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 1

      +: cool with gays.
      -: volcanoes; no sense of humour.

      I'll still with England. We suck but we sure know how to laugh at ourselves.

    21. Re:Random chance by jez9999 · · Score: 2

      No sense of humour? What do you think Icesave was? The only problem was that the English took THAT one seriously.

    22. Re:Random chance by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Volcanoes are easy.

          Step 1: Stay far away from anything substantially higher than air temperature.
          Step 2: Stay far away from anywhere the lava may flow.

          In the end, you win or lose. Winners survive. Losers ... well ... don't survive.
         

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    23. Re:Random chance by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      No, norse language did not branch off west germanic languages..

      Germanic languages split into three somewhere around North Germany/South Scandinavia: East, West and North, but East Germanic languages later died out.

      English is close to Icelandic and Danish, because Denmark conquered and settled England for a century or so around 1000AD, straightening out most of the grammatics of verbs (only the am/are/is separation survived), setting the names of the week-days, introducing danish derived names for life and death, and in general creating a foundation for better understanding between English and North Germanic Languages.

      But yes, even without a language-sanity training at swords-point North and West Germanic languages are still closer than Germanic and Italic languages.

    24. Re:Random chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like a 68 years old vulcano.

    25. Re:Random chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      See for yourself: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jóhanna_Sigurðardóttir

      I'd say that yes, she's indeed a very good-looking woman.

    26. Re:Random chance by Rei · · Score: 1

      Old Norse (or more accurately, Proto-Norse) is the origin point of the North Germanic languages. Hence, it branched off from the West Germanic languages when each went their separate ways (aka, were no longer mutually intelligible)

      English has a number of Norse-origin loanwords (several hundred), but has more in common through the original Germanic connection.

      --
      You're not made of Tuesday!
    27. Re:Random chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thú skrifaðir "sé: See".

      Hér er "sé" eiginlega viðtengingarháttur sagnarinnar að "vera" en ekki að "sjá" (sem væri "sjái" eða "sér" i framsöguhætti).

      að vera
      http://bin.arnastofnun.is/leit.php?id=469289
      að sjá
      http://bin.arnastofnun.is/leit.php?id=466523

    28. Re:Random chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course they will. However, there wasn't even a magnitude 6 earthquake on May 21st anywhere in the world, there were no reports of anyone being "raptured", and it was essentially a slow news day.

      If it was Katla that erupted, the bigger one next door to Eyjafjallajokull, then it could be something impressive. It has been historically quite an explosive volcano and would likely produce ash plumes much worse than Eyjafjallajokull. Grimsvotn? Pah. It erupted a few years ago (1996) and no one but Icelanders and geologists took much interest. At best there might be some impressive jokulhlaups that will take out some bridges and roads, but Icelanders are already smart enough not to live downstream. Who knows? Maybe this eruption of Grimsvotn will turn out to differ from the historical pattern it has followed, but it's doubtful.

      It won't stop the crazies from grasping at straws, but, seriously, there are volcanoes erupting somewhere in the world every day, and it wouldn't surprise me if there was an eruption somewhere else in the world that was actually worse by some measures.

    29. Re:Random chance by gislifb · · Score: 1

      etta er bara nokkuð rétt hjá ér! *Hjörleifur said that the warningsystem had been activated. We are treating this as an eruption. We have sent out warnings to England so flight operators can change flights. (This would be a good translation)*

      --
      In a world without fences and walls, who needs gates and windows?
    30. Re:Random chance by Rei · · Score: 1

      Takk! :) Hehe, ég get ruglað Íslensku mjög vel stundum ;) Ég verð að aefa mig. Fyrsti ferð mín til Íslands er í Júlí. Ég ekki að allir tala ensku, en mér finnst gaman að læra. :)

      (hmmm... Slashdot borðar "thorns". "Ég 'th'ekki...", etc)

      --
      You're not made of Tuesday!
    31. Re:Random chance by srodden · · Score: 1

      Hey, at least we can pronounce this one!

      --
      Why can't we let people believe whatever they like? It's not like a little religion has ever hurt anyone.
    32. Re:Random chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pics: http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=j%C3%B3hanna+sigur%C3%B0ard%C3%B3ttir&hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=AlI&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&prmd=ivnso&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=5ZjZTZ-9NI2WhQf8wtnCBg&ved=0CCcQsAQ&biw=1600&bih=729

    33. Re:Random chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is she hot?

      I doubt she's interested.

    34. Re:Random chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ekkert að thakka, ég er líka að læra en að er alltaf gaman að skrifa, eða að minnsta kosti að [i]reyna[/i] að skrifa á islensku. Góða ferð!

    35. Re:Random chance by xaxa · · Score: 1

      I've never tried to read or speak it, but your word-by-word translation makes it look sufficiently similar to English. "Að er allt = that is all" is a good start, and the word order looks friendly :). I know what the æ, ð and are, they were covered in an English lesson (in England) a long time ago.

      Icelandic seems weird to English-only speakers (especially Americans) because of all those "funny letters". A friend-of-a-friend met an American girl on the web, who was desperate to visit Europe (i.e. London). She stayed over at my house on her last day here (I live near the airport) and left a note thanking us for the hospitality. It was signed "Çhløë Türnër" in an effort to look more European (see also: Häagen-Dazs).

  3. Rapture by tom17 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Fail.

    1. Re:Rapture by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 5, Funny

      Fail.

      With the world economy the way it is right now, it's hard to do a quality Rapture on the limited budget that God can afford, what with his credit rating in the toilet, and all.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    2. Re:Rapture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fail.

      With the world economy the way it is right now, it's hard to do a quality Rapture on the limited budget that God can afford, what with his credit rating in the toilet, and all.

      That explains all the devout Christians getting bus tickets in the mail.

    3. Re:Rapture by game+kid · · Score: 1

      With the world economy the way it is right now, it's hard to do a quality Rapture on the limited budget that God can afford, what with his credit rating in the toilet, and all.

      It's all His fault! He could've just bought that 1-bedroom house in Flushing (J-Dawg got His right hand and they can share the flatscreen, so no need for 2), but He just had to take out the jumbo morg on that crib with the pearly gates. Our God is an idiot.

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  4. Apocalypse? by Chewbacon · · Score: 1

    Or isn't it a little early for this? I thought I was in the clear seeing people with Christian bumper stickers still driving their cars after 6:30.

    --
    Chewbacon
    The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
    1. Re:Apocalypse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If i was your god Christians would be the last people i would save, bunch of egotistical, hypocritical, douche-bags that took a great concept and ruined it. (I'm allowed to make christian jokes i am one).

    2. Re:Apocalypse? by e9th · · Score: 1

      "Christianity has not been tried and found wanting; it has been found difficult and not tried."

      --G.K. Chesterton

  5. Xenu did it by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

    with H-bombs

  6. So.. they were a little off. Human error? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is the rapture folks. Maybe this is the start of the worldwide hell we're suppose to have and the rapture folks got the calculations slightly wrong due to human error. Or maybe the book says we won't know when it is coming so he off'd it slightly! lol

    Just trying to come up with what excuses they could give to make what didn't happen happen.

  7. Planet Nimburu by Renaissancing · · Score: 1

    Great. Nibiru fodder. Quick, someone tell my brother so he can start linking those videos on YouTube again. SOB!

  8. 15 km by kvvbassboy · · Score: 1

    ...sending plumes of smoke 15km into the air.

    15 km is nearly two times the height of Mt. Everest.

    Which is very, very high up.

    1. Re:15 km by Compaqt · · Score: 1

      >15km into the air

      Speaking of which, does the air extend 15 km up?

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    2. Re:15 km by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100km is usually seem as the atmosphere "upper bound". But this is really high. Commercial airplanes fly at around 11km. A F22 can fly up to 20km.

    3. Re:15 km by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      According to wikipedia, the atmosphere extends 100 km up. This volcano has quite a way to go before it hits space. Although it may have made it up to the stratosphere.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    4. Re:15 km by JustOK · · Score: 1

      according to the Big Bang Theory, 10 miles is still in the atmosphere

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    5. Re:15 km by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      It's not even *that* far up--most modern military jets can fly that high.

    6. Re:15 km by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is that far, it's just that modern technology has, once again, made nature their bitch.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:15 km by JustOK · · Score: 1

      still a good place for inaccurate Star Trek sex

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    8. Re:15 km by rossdee · · Score: 1

      And the Blackbirds could fly at nearly 30Km. However its the effect on commercial jets that will be the problem.
      (as it was with the previous major icelandic eruption.

    9. Re:15 km by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Still, any height at which an airplane staying aloft by aerodynamic forces and using an air-breathing engine can operate has to be described as part of the atmosphere.

  9. I hate Iceland by norriefc · · Score: 1

    Hopefully it will cause more of my countrymen to make the news http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34mHZgP9vkc

    1. Re:I hate Iceland by Rei · · Score: 1

      Given the Cod Wars, I hardly pity the UK being inconvenienced from Icelandic volcanic activity. Which is hardly something they can control anyway.

      --
      You're not made of Tuesday!
    2. Re:I hate Iceland by norriefc · · Score: 1

      The cod war was nothing compared to the horror inflicted upon us by the cold war, thank you for North Korea btw (assuming you're an American, if not I apologize very very much)

    3. Re:I hate Iceland by Silvermistshadow · · Score: 1

      Hey, if it weren't for us, it'd just be the Democratic Republic of Korea, and still be the same shithole, but over a bigger area.

      --
      Any comments made by the owner of this signature should be disregarded as irrelevant, uninformed, and idiotic.
    4. Re:I hate Iceland by Rei · · Score: 1

      I don't see how Iceland has anything to do with your involvement in the Cold War. Or was your goal to change from a discussion of a dispute between Iceland and the UK into a dispute between the UK and the US in order to avoid discussing your long history of (over) exploiting the resources of a poorer country which couldn't defend itself?

      --
      You're not made of Tuesday!
    5. Re:I hate Iceland by norriefc · · Score: 1

      I'd disagree. I'm no great understander (new word by the way) of geopolitics but since the cold war has died there has been quite a few countries liberated from communist powers, who are you to say that Korea wouldn't have been one of them. Who knows, maybe they'd have become a shining light of democracy and even forced China into a brave new world.

  10. Yay. by Chardansearavitriol · · Score: 1, Funny

    The one good thing, that can never be disupted about these volcanoes, is that they expose us to the wonderful names the slavic folks give such frighteningly powerful systems.

    1. Re:Yay. by norriefc · · Score: 1

      Slavic ? I take Slavic to mean someone of Eastern/Central European origin of which Iceland most certainly isn't Of course you may mean something else , I hope to be educated if I'm wrong

  11. Down with Iceland by lucm · · Score: 3, Funny

    Not only those people give asylum to known subversive people (such as Bobby Fischer) but with their volcano eruptions they are speeding up glaciers melting, causing people to believe in global warming. And whenever they run out of money because they can't do proper banking they make deals with the communists.

    If they could send the fumes over Libya it could cripple the army and help the revolution - but no, they prefer bothering the good people who are planning a trip to Europe.

    (Days like this one, I feel like I could do a pretty decent job at Fox news).

    --
    lucm, indeed.
    1. Re:Down with Iceland by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's like the exact opposite of what I was thinking. Not only does Iceland have chess on TV, and hot babes, but they have cool volcanoes on top of it! How can it really get any better?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:Down with Iceland by lucm · · Score: 1

      > Not only does Iceland have chess on TV, and hot babes, but they have cool volcanoes on top of it! How can it really get any better?

      They could have hot babes on tv and chess on top of volcanoes! That would be awesomer.

      But no, they insist of ruining my trips to Europe.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    3. Re:Down with Iceland by Idarubicin · · Score: 5, Informative

      How can it really get any better?

      The entire country pretty much runs on geothermal and hydroelectric power.

      There are bathable hot springs.

      The word geyser comes from Icelandic.

      The whole country is snuggled up against the Arctic circle, but the jet stream keeps it from getting unpleasantly cold. In summer it can get quite toasty, actually. (And from June through August the sun dips below the horizon, but it never gets really dark.) In winter, you can see northern lights in the afternoon.

      They have Europe's largest waterfall.

      And millions of puffins.

      And, for better or worse, Björk.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    4. Re:Down with Iceland by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Not only does Iceland have chess on TV, and hot babes, but they have cool volcanoes on top of it! How can it really get any better?

      They could have hot babes on tv and chess on top of volcanoes!

      Volcanoes on TV and chess with hot babes? Strip chess?

    5. Re:Down with Iceland by lucm · · Score: 1

      You fool, hot babes don't play chess, they are too busy posing for cheap t-shirts ads, wearing headsets (see http://www.headsethotties.com/) and/or using their charms to make people sign waivers when they get caught in lousy hidden camera pranks. Duh.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    6. Re:Down with Iceland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just bear in mind that the 'whole country' is like a large town in the rest of the world with less than half a million people and their electricity needs is likewise very small, since they do not have any heavy industry or smelters.

    7. Re:Down with Iceland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Internet Spaceships

    8. Re:Down with Iceland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but have you tasted any of the national dishes?

      Hákarl is traditionally prepared by gutting and beheading a Greenland or basking shark and placing it in a shallow hole dug in gravelly-sand, with the now-cleaned cavity resting on a slight hill. The shark is then covered with sand and gravel, and stones are then placed on top of the sand in order to press the shark. The fluids from the shark are in this way pressed out of the body. The shark ferments in this fashion for 6–12 weeks depending on the season.

      Following this curing period, the shark is then cut into strips and hung to dry for several months. During this drying period a brown crust will develop, which is removed prior to cutting the shark into small pieces and serving. The modern method is just to press the shark's meat in a large drained plastic container.

      Hákarl

    9. Re:Down with Iceland by Rei · · Score: 1

      Most people in Iceland find it disgusting, and it's not eaten often. Pizza, on the other hand...

      --
      You're not made of Tuesday!
    10. Re:Down with Iceland by Rei · · Score: 2

      No heavy industry or smelters? Their main export is aluminum. What do you think the Kárahnjukar hydro plant was built for?

      --
      You're not made of Tuesday!
  12. why? by binaryseraph · · Score: 1

    Why is this on /. ???

    1. Re:why? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Because there are geology nerds on /.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  13. * Xena did it by chronokitsune3233 · · Score: 0

    with her good looks

    --
    I have been a captive in America my entire life. Everybody and everything uses customary units instead of metric.
  14. Every time I report some news, my wife asks: by ddrueding80 · · Score: 1

    So, I don't get it, is /this/ the end of the world?

  15. Ragnarok! by chill · · Score: 3, Funny

    Not the Christian Rapture, but Ragnarok! Right date, wrong set of Gods. Oops.

    They probably just saw the movie Thor, causing Odin to blow mead thru his nose. Keep an eye on the sun, and any wolves you meet.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    1. Re:Ragnarok! by Culture20 · · Score: 2

      Has the Internet seen an increased number of trolls?

    2. Re:Ragnarok! by chill · · Score: 1

      That would be infinity+1, wouldn't it? I always wondered what that symbol was for. Thanks for pointing out a practical usage.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    3. Re:Ragnarok! by Sinthet · · Score: 1

      Well, if the world did end, I'd much prefer it to so in total bad-assery. RAGNAROK!!

    4. Re:Ragnarok! by Archwyrm · · Score: 1

      Huzzah for that! An axe-age, a sword-age, shields shall be split! Let Surtr spread his fire, let the nail-ship sail with her legions! We shall meet our doom as men battling the hordes of the underworld, not naked floating in the clouds. Die with your boots on! A wind-age, a wolf-age, before the wrecking of the world.

      --
      Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power. -- Mussolini
    5. Re:Ragnarok! by Archwyrm · · Score: 1

      It's not all bad actually, from the Wikipedia article:

      earth will appear once more from the sea, beautiful and green, where self-sown crops grow. The field Iðavöllr exists where Asgard once was, and, there, untouched by Surtr's flames, Víðarr and Váli reside. Now possessing their father's hammer Mjolnir, Thor's sons Móði and Magni will meet them there, and, coming from Hel, Baldr and Höðr also arrive.

      So, the earth grows anew and the children of the gods take their parents' places. Sounds more like a cycle of rebirth than a cataclysmic end. Though, if your name is not Líf or Lífthrasir you are probably going to die.

      --
      Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power. -- Mussolini
    6. Re:Ragnarok! by LongearedBat · · Score: 1

      Yep, and a change in sprites.

    7. Re:Ragnarok! by Knutsi · · Score: 1

      As a Norwegian I found the movie Thor quite interesting (: It was sort of neat how they refurbished the old cosmology of the norse mythology with modern day elements. Apart from the annoying pronunciation of scandinavian words ("We're going to Jotunheim!" which is an actual place quite close to where I grew up) it was fun.

      Those who like the movie might enjoy taking a peek at the actual mythology (:

  16. Jove Rapture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EVE pilots beware! The Jovians are coming to collect the good capsuleers!

  17. It's pronounceable! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Thankfully "Grimsvotn" is pronounceable. The last Icelandic volcano, Eyjafjallajökull, was just a little difficult to talk about.

    1. Re:It's pronounceable! by norriefc · · Score: 1

      Only to non Icelandic heathens Therefore most of the world Oh wait....

    2. Re:It's pronounceable! by Rei · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you're mispronouncing it. It's basically "GREEMS-vih-dn", with the ö pronounced as the eux in the French "deux" and the 'r' rolled.

      And anyway, Grímsvötn actually refers to the subglacial lakes in the area (vötn = lakes, plural of vatn)

      --
      You're not made of Tuesday!
  18. Not Slavic by dlenmn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If by Slavic you mean North Germanic,[ 1] then yes.

    1. Re:Not Slavic by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Funny

      If by Slavic you mean North Germanic, then yes.

      Isn't Iceland part of Scandislavia?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Not Slavic by LongearedBat · · Score: 1

      Yes, GP is being sarcastic. Icelanders are not Slavic, they're mainly Germanic and Gaelic (probably mixed with Inuit).

  19. Stop volcanic proliferation! by catmistake · · Score: 5, Funny

    Every time there's a volcanic eruption we are reminded by anti-volcanics just how dangerous volcanos are, that even with really thick gloves lava is simply too hot to handle, and no amount of safety regulations will mitigate the mortal danger they pose. When will society wise up and realize volcanos are far too unpredictable? Even if there weren't eruptions, no amount of science or development is going to make them economically viable.

    1. Re:Stop volcanic proliferation! by Soulshift · · Score: 1

      This is the first time I've really wished I had mod points! Nice post.

      --
      node-def: a tactical hacking sim. Now in open beta.
    2. Re:Stop volcanic proliferation! by jamesh · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is exactly the sort of anti-volcanic rhetoric I'd expect from the unwashed masses. This volcano was built using plans from three generations ago. Todays volcano's are far safer and far less likely to erupt in such an unpredictable fashion. Your are glossing over the fact that this volcano has just endured a rapture and is only blowing a small quantity of ash. The design specifically stated that the volcano would require some additional re-enforcements before the rapture came but these were never done owing to budget constraints, so it's hardly fair to judge all volcano's on the poor maintenance of this one case.

    3. Re:Stop volcanic proliferation! by sincewhen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This. We have had no new volcanoes in the US for decades. The ones we have are getting quite old, but have been operating safely - there have only been minor incidents and occasional loss of life. Instead of learning from the mistakes of other countries (Look at Krakatoa or Pompeii) and having safe volcanoes, they refuse to allow any new volcanoes at all. Meanwhile, earthquakes kill far more people, but we do nothing about them!

      --
      -- Braden's law of data: All data spends some of its lifetime in an excel spreadsheet.
    4. Re:Stop volcanic proliferation! by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      I've had modpoints continuously all week, and today of all days I have none :-(

      Rapture probably took 'em to heaven.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    5. Re:Stop volcanic proliferation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, this particular volcano has a passive cooling system installed that makes human exposure to hot lava much less likely than other volcanic designs, albeit at the cost of some other minor side-effects.

    6. Re:Stop volcanic proliferation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just don't fucking get it, do you? Iceland may be a peaceful nation and reasonably insulated from the tentacles of terrorism, but there are other countries and regions that don't get along so well... like in the Middle-East... Its no wonder Israel seems so imperial or combative, they're really just paranoid, and rightfully so!

  20. Massive Volcano Erupts In Iceland And Feeds End Of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Massive Volcano Erupts In Iceland And Feeds End Of The World Fears Exclusive

    Read more: http://www.gossip.currentblips.com/2011/05/massive-volcano-erupts-in-iceland-and.html#ixzz1N2UP5TrD

  21. Anyone with access to data? by erroneus · · Score: 1

    Has there or has there not been an increase in weather and seismic events on the planet of late? Starting as early as hurricane katrina, the frequency and severity of such events seem to be increasing. Of course it could be that the news is making a much bigger deal than ever before and I never noticed before and now take more notice of these things. So I wonder if there isn't some sort of data which could be made into a larger overall picture of what has been happening and how severe the events have been over the past 30 or so years.

    For now, it just seems like there is a strong uptake in these events and, as I'm sure we all know, Yellowstone's super-volcano is still pushing upwards so I fear the worst is yet to come.

    1. Re:Anyone with access to data? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Has there or has there not been an increase in weather and seismic events on the planet of late?

      No.

      Of course it could be that the news is making a much bigger deal than ever before and I never noticed before and now take more notice of these things.

      Yes.

    2. Re:Anyone with access to data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the result of the creation of 24 hours news channels and sites and such. People keep reporting events around the clock. If you read just a paper at morning, you'd feel like the world has a slower pace. But the total quantity of events is the same.

    3. Re:Anyone with access to data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has there or has there not been an increase in weather and seismic events on the planet of late?

      No.

      I know this is /., but do yo really just have to cavalierly make sh*t up like that?

      If you actually look at the data -- and not just stick to some ideology -- you'd see that, why yes, seismic events have been increasing. According to the USGS, there has been a six-fold increase in large earthquakes (magnitude 7 or above) in the past 10 years than in the proceeding period.

      Just because the end-of-worlders are full of hot air doesn't mean that the earth is static. I can't even begin to categorize that logical fallacy.

    4. Re:Anyone with access to data? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

      Has there or has there not been an increase in weather

      We've always had a constant amount of weather; it's just the quality that changes.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    5. Re:Anyone with access to data? by erroneus · · Score: 1

      At least quote the WHOLE sentence will ya? "weather AND seismic events." You know? As in "weather events and seismic events" combined for efficient and meaningful sentence construction? And it was implied that I was talking about disasterous weather events, not seasonal rain or clear skies.

      It has been recorded that the temperature of the oceans have increased. It has been recorded that there has been an increase in seismic activity over the past 10 years when compared against the previous 10. So maybe I am not imagining things after all.

    6. Re:Anyone with access to data? by Solandri · · Score: 2

      Of course it could be that the news is making a much bigger deal than ever before and I never noticed before and now take more notice of these things.

      Yes.

      As the world's population increases, it becomes more and more likely that a natural disaster will strike a populated area. Corollary to that, as technology advances, it becomes more and more likely that there will be video of a natural disaster for news services to splash all over the TV/website.

    7. Re:Anyone with access to data? by Layzej · · Score: 1

      Good question. The graph shown at this link compares reported earthquakes to all disasters. It shows number, but not severity: http://www.grid.unep.ch/product/publication/download/article_climate_change_hazards.pdf

      "Much of the increase in the number of hazardous events is probably due to significant improvements in information access and also to population growth, but the number of floods and cyclones being reported is still rising compared to earthquakes. How, we must ask, is global warming affecting the frequency of natural hazards?"

  22. Interesting by Daetrin · · Score: 1

    After the eruption of Eyajawhatever people were theorizing that it would be followed by an eruption of Katla based on records of past eruptions. But instead of Katla, Grimsvotn lit off instead. I wonder if there's any relation between the two, and if so if this means that the pressure has been relieved and Katla isn't going to do anything, or if we're building up to a spectacularly huge Katla eruption,

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    1. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the news, Grímsvötn erupts approximately once every five years. That sounds a bit too frequent to have a relation with Katla, which has intervals of more than 40 years.

    2. Re:Interesting by Idarubicin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Grímsvötn has been erupting semi-regularly for decades; in the last twenty years there have been eruptions in 1996, 1998, 2004, and now 2011. While long-term volcano prediction is more of an art than a science, there's no particular reason to believe that this eruption is related to either the Eyjafjallajökull eruption or to the still-apparently-quiescent (keep your fingers crossed) Katla. Grímsvötn is actually quite a distance from Katla: roughly 150 km. Eyjafjallajökull is much closer to Katla (just 30 km) and the initial smaller eruption last year (on Fimmvörðuháls) was nearer still.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    3. Re:Interesting by Rei · · Score: 1

      Oooh, someone who knows their Icelandic geography and actually types their accents, umlauts, and eths ;) I'm actually hoping to hike Fimmvörðuháls in July. It should be pretty neat, seeing the lava that móði and magni laid down fresh over the trail.

      --
      You're not made of Tuesday!
    4. Re:Interesting by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      I do envy you... It's about 10 years now since I last made it to iceland. I need to get back there. Since then, i picked up fishing... so those salmon up there do increase the urge by quite a bit :D

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    5. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, just before the start of eruption, we could see a series of earthquakes (some more than 3 on Richter scale) extending along the faultline which links the two volcanic calderas, from Katla towards Grímsvötn. Followed by the classical seismic activity while breaking through last kilometers of crust (around 18:00 hrs saturday evening).
      Icelandic Meteological Institute: http://www.vedur.is/skjalftar-og-eldgos/jardskjalftar - check the table tab; (Tafla).

      Volcanic activity often comes in series, this Grímsvötn series is since 1996. More frequent eruptions - less probability of great damage.

      For the geeky side of things; on radio an volcanologist guessed the volume of emitted material to be around 20.000 tons/second right now. My father-in-law took about 3 seconds calculating that this is about four times the weight of all cruiser ships coming to Iceland per year.

      Best regards from Iceland

    6. Re:Interesting by Idarubicin · · Score: 1

      Oooh, someone who knows their Icelandic geography and actually types their accents, umlauts, and eths ;)

      I admit that I cheated -- I copied and pasted from the Wikipedia articles. :D

      Over the last couple of years, I've learnt that Iceland is an absolutely brilliant place to stop for a few days to decompress in the middle of a transatlantic flight. My partner and I will be back again for a week this fall, mostly exploring the south and southeast. We'll probably do a day hike up the Skógá river, but we won't cross over Fimmvörðuháls this year--she's recovering from knee surgery, so spending the evenings in a warm hot pot has more appeal than freezing on a mountain pass.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    7. Re:Interesting by Rei · · Score: 1

      South and east, eh? And minimal hiking?

        * The pictures I've seen of the beaches near Vík are stunning. :)
        * If you're going to rent a 4x4, you can drive through the Landmannalaugar area.
        * Skógafoss is amazing, and you can camp right by it. Of course, you said you're already going up the Skóga....
        * Svartifoss is a bit more out of the way and smaller, but beautifully framed by columnar basalt cliffs.
        * I've heard the Morsá valley recommended, and it definitely looks like an easy hike, although the pictures I've seen don't impress me as much as elsewhere.
        * Jökulsárlón is an obvious candidate, and kind of hard to avoid anyway ;)
        * I assume you're not planning to get on top of Vatnajökull ;)

      But you probably already know that stuff ;) Ooh, actually, here's something you may or may not know: in August, this happens at Jökulsárlón. :) Wish I could be there for it, but I had to choose between that and Bræðslan.

      --
      You're not made of Tuesday!
    8. Re:Interesting by Idarubicin · · Score: 1

      South and east, eh? And minimal hiking?

      Weeeell...not minimal hiking. Just no overnight trips over mountains; we like our warm beds and cold beer fridge. The length of day hikes we choose will probably be based on how hard it's raining. :)

      We will definitely make it as far east as Skaftafell to see Svartifoss and do some of the hiking in the area. I'd like to get out to Jökulsárlón, but we just may not have time on this trip. (And perhaps we should come back in August for it, if there are going to be fireworks--that's definitely news to me!) We're staying near Skógar, so it's a long drive out and back for a single day.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    9. Re:Interesting by Rei · · Score: 1

      Lol, I have to get used to the concept of staying in a single location on a trip ;) When we travel, we always move every night. At least on this trip we'll have a car to act as a mobile home base. What a luxury, not having to have all of our gear on our backs at once! ;) Esp. food.

      Come back in August? So are you going before then? Because we'll be there in mid-late July. :) If that's the case, lol, we could meet up for lunch or something.

      --
      You're not made of Tuesday!
    10. Re:Interesting by Idarubicin · · Score: 1

      Lol, I have to get used to the concept of staying in a single location on a trip ;) When we travel, we always move every night.

      There are definitely arguments for both methods of travel. Oftentimes I'll split the difference and stay two or three nights in each location just so I don't have to worry about packing and unpacking, and checking in and out on time, and finding a hostel, and carrying my bag, every day. Short stays are particularly useful when I'm visiting a country or region for the first time and I want to get my bearings and catch the highlights. We've been to Iceland before, so we're now doing some 'in-depth' exploration.

      Come back in August? So are you going before then? Because we'll be there in mid-late July.

      Ah, I should have been more clear -- our next visit is late September this year; I was just anticipating a summer visit in some future year. We've actually never been during the summer 'high' season. (Visiting during the late spring and early fall 'shoulder' seasons has saved us a small fortune in car rental and accommodation fees, and we've been remarkably lucky with the weather so far.)

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    11. Re:Interesting by Rei · · Score: 1

      Rental prices vary hugely. We got our car reserved from CheapJeep for 9,000 ISK/day (under $50/d) midseason -- by Icelandic standards, that's a steal. I don't know about accomodation fees, as we're only camping and couchsurfing. I could quote you prices for remote trail cabins, though, lol ;)

      Well, either way, I'm sure you'll have a great time :)

      --
      You're not made of Tuesday!
  23. Rapture light! by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

    More great taste. Much less filling! *And* you don't have to listen to those annoying proselytizers.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  24. On an unrelated note: English names are stupid by Cyberax · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    On an unrelated note: English names are stupid. Really.

    Come on, why 'Colbert' is pronounced as 'Col-bear'? Or what about this 'th' sound in general? It's ridiculous!

    Names starting 'w' ('William', 'Watson') are laughable and ambiguous - the first sound can not be adequately transcribed in Russian, it's either hard 'w' (as in 'water') or clear 'u'. Wouldn't it better if everyone just used perfectly serviceable Russian names like Tatyana or Fyodor?

    And don't get me started on differences between 'wh' and 'th'.

    1. Re:On an unrelated note: English names are stupid by zach_the_lizard · · Score: 1

      Colbert, like many of our weird English spellings, is French.

      --
      SSC
    2. Re:On an unrelated note: English names are stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On an unrelated note: English names are stupid. Really.

      Come on, why 'Colbert' is pronounced as 'Col-bear'? Or what about this 'th' sound in general? It's ridiculous!

      If you're referring to Stephen Colbert, his family name is "Coal-BERT". He uses "Coal-BEAR" in jest.

    3. Re:On an unrelated note: English names are stupid by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      I know. However, some words are pronounced this way ('rapport', for example).

      Also, this tendency of English to borrow spelling _and_ pronunciation from other languages had been driving me crazy when I was learning it. On the other hand German (which has very consistent transcription of words) was much easier to learn.

    4. Re:On an unrelated note: English names are stupid by wisty · · Score: 3, Informative

      Spelling was deregulated until roughly Coleridge's time. Thus Shakespeare spelt his name quite a few different ways.

      Eventually, there was a big move to standardize English spelling. Rather than adopt a simple phonetic system, the academics chose to use the phonetic system of the root word. If the word is Germanic, in origin, you use a Germanic inspired phonetics. If it's French, in origin, you use a French inspired phonetic system. Greek? Latin? Guess what, there's more systems. Sucks, doesn't it?

      Oh, and Dutch printers were some of the first big printers of English books, so sometimes a bit of Dutch crept in.

    5. Re:On an unrelated note: English names are stupid by Nirvelli · · Score: 1

      Colbert - It's French, Bitch.
      (Also, by video.)

    6. Re:On an unrelated note: English names are stupid by russotto · · Score: 1

      Colbert, like many of our weird English spellings, is French.

      Fine. But Worcester (pronounced "wooster" or "woosta") and Taliaferro (pronounced "throatwarbler mangrove", err, no, actually "tolliver") have no similar excuse.

    7. Re:On an unrelated note: English names are stupid by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Waiter! Can you bring me some worcheser.... worchestire.... worcestyre.... ketchup, please?

    8. Re:On an unrelated note: English names are stupid by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 1

      Want to know about strange pronunciation?

      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    9. Re:On an unrelated note: English names are stupid by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 3, Informative

      I take it you already know
      Of tough and bough and cough and dough?
      Others may stumble, but not you,
      On hiccough, thorough, lough and through?
      Well done! And now you wish, perhaps,
      To learn of less familiar traps?
      Beware of heard, a dreadful word
      That looks like beard and sounds like bird,
      And dead: it's said like bed, not bead -
      For goodness sake don't call it deed!
      Watch out for meat and great and threat
      (They rhyme with suite and straight and debt).

      A moth is not a moth in mother,
      Nor both in bother, broth in brother,
      And here is not a match for there
      Nor dear and fear for bear and pear,
      And then there's dose and rose and lose -
      Just look them up - and goose and choose,
      And cork and work and card and ward,
      And font and front and word and sword,
      And do and go and thwart and cart -
      Come, come, I've hardly made a start!
      A dreadful language? Man alive!
      I'd mastered it when I was five!

      (author unknown)

      For extra credit, look up Gerard Nolst Trenité.

    10. Re:On an unrelated note: English names are stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even more off topic: If you are amused by the above, you'll love: http://www.spellingsociety.org/news/media/poems.php

    11. Re:On an unrelated note: English names are stupid by jbengt · · Score: 1

      Alos, pronunciations evolve over time.

    12. Re:On an unrelated note: English names are stupid by rossdee · · Score: 1

      However the French did conquer England, whereas the Germans were' foiled by a few brave RAF chaps.

  25. beavis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you said erupt..

    heheheheheheh

  26. Oops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet the atheists are feeling pretty silly right about now.

    1. Re:Oops by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Also, Iceland is pissed, because as they were the only ones to undergo rapture, they will be the only ones to undergo the end of the world with its assorted plagues and large parts of the popuation dying.

      As said in Revelation 8:7ff. (2011 Post-Icelandic Rapture Bible):
      7The first angel sounded, and there followed hail and fire mingled with blood, and they were cast upon Iceland; and a third part of the trees were burned up, and all green grass was burned up.
      8And the second angel sounded and, as it were, a great mountain burning with fire was cast into the Atlantic Ocean right before Iceland; and a third part of the Iceland shore waters became blood;
      9and a third part of the creatures which were in the sea around Iceland and had life, died, and a third part of the Icelandic ships were destroyed.
      10And the third angel sounded, and there fell a great star from heaven, burning as if it were a lamp, and it fell upon a third part of the rivers and upon the fountains of waters in Iceland;
      11and the name of the star is called Wormwood. And a third part of the Icelandic waters became wormwood; and many Icelandic men died from the waters, because they were made bitter.
      12And the fourth angel sounded, and a third part of the sun was smitten, and a third part of the moon and a third part of the stars, so that a third part of them was darkened; and a third of the day shone not, and the night likewise. Only over Iceland, for God placed a mighty pair of sunglasses over Iceland.
      13And I beheld, and heard an angel flying through the midst of heaven, saying with a loud voice, "Woe, woe, woe to the inhabitants of Iceland, because of the other voices of the trumpets of the three other angels, which are yet to sound!"

      Revelation 9
      1And the fifth angel sounded, and I saw a star fall from heaven unto Iceland; and to him was given the key to the bottomless pit.
      2And he opened the bottomless pit, and there arose a smoke out of the pit, as the smoke of a great furnace; and the sun and the air over Iceland were darkened by reason of the smoke of the pit.
      3And there came out of the smoke locusts upon the earth; and unto them was given power, as the scorpions of the earth have power, except the locusts only had power over Iceland.
      4And it was commanded to them that they should not hurt the grass of the earth, neither any green thing, neither any tree, but only those men on Iceland who have not the seal of God in their foreheads.
      5And to them it was given that they should not kill them, but that they should be tormented five months; and their torment was as the torment of a scorpion when he striketh a man.
      6And in those days shall Icelanders seek death, and shall not find it; and shall desire to die, and death shall flee from them.
      [...]
      13And the sixth angel sounded, and I heard a voice from the four horns of the golden altar which stands before God,
      14saying to the sixth angel who had the trumpet, "Loose the four angels who are bound in the great river Thjórsá."
      15And the four angels were loosed, who had been prepared for an hour and a day and a month and a year, to slay a third part of men on Iceland.
      [...]
      18By these three was a third part of men on Iceland killed by the fire and by the smoke and by the brimstone, which issued out of their mouths.
      19For their power is in their mouth and in their tails; for their tails were like unto serpents and had heads, and with them they cause hurt unto Icelanders.


      Other parts of Revelations detail how Satan is banished to Iceland, how Reykjavík falls and all the Icelandic merchants weep, the great battle on the Hekla and how in the end both the Icelandic part of heaven and Iceland are destroyed as God creates a new Iceland.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  27. Let's just be on the lookout by Dragon_Hilord · · Score: 1

    Keep an eye out later for empty clothing. If you're reading this, you weren't chosen. Sorry.

    --
    Cheers, DH.
    1. Re:Let's just be on the lookout by NVW55V · · Score: 1

      Put dry ice into some old shoes and put them out on the sidewalk.

    2. Re:Let's just be on the lookout by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Excellent, now we can get on with the serious science.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  28. Mod parent up by Cyberax · · Score: 1

    Brilliant!

  29. So maybe God was just a little confused... by SwedishChef · · Score: 1

    by time zones. Camping never did say whether that was 6pm standard time, daylight time or sun time. So let the eruptions and volcanic fun commence!

    --
    No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
  30. Oh Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are going to cite this as evidence.

    Evidence of what exactly?

    In other words. Just because you don't side with those bozos doesn't mean your aren't being daft.

  31. no secret rapture, we knew tha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, so there is no secret rapture, we knew that. So back to the Great Tribulation that all Christians must go through before Jesus Christ really returns. And there will be nothing secret about it because "every eye shall see!" For those who want to know how to stand firm during the Great Tribulation then find my book, Final Warning, because the hour of His Judgment has come. Posted by Rev. Daniel W. Blair

  32. "Eruptions" blog by Opyros · · Score: 1

    I recommend Erik Klemetti's blog Eruptions to anyone who wants to follow Grimsvotn in detail. He has two posts on it already: http://bigthink.com/ideas/38526 and http://bigthink.com/ideas/38530, and they include links to webcams and other information sources.

  33. The rapture did happen by fredmosby · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There just wern't any true believers to take to heaven.

  34. One word: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    zzzZZZZzzz.......

    1. Re:One word: by Khan · · Score: 0

      dammit...didn't notice I wasn't logged in. Anyway, the above comment is a registered (c) (tm) of Khan. I take credit for my posts ;-)

      --

      "Klaatu, verada, necktie!" -Ash

  35. 2500 giraffes by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    It's also about 2500 tall giraffes high, or 1/25000th of the distance to the moon, on average. Get used to metric so you won't need comparison figures that make no sense. Or did you climb Mt Everest yourself?

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
  36. Waterfall Re:Down with Iceland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Iceland's longest waterfall is a puny 196 meters, Norway has one that's about 600 meters (over half a kilometer) and I have no idea if that's the longest one.

    Iceland < Norway :D

    Hey wait now I do:
    Vinnufossen in Norway is the tallest in Europe 860 meters high and with a free drop of 420 meters that's a free fall of water over twice the total height of the largest Icelandic one :)

    http://world-waterfalls.com/database.php?s=N&t=H&orderby=height&sortLimit=300

    Heia Norge! *Peker nese til islendingene* ;)

    1. Re:Waterfall Re:Down with Iceland by Rei · · Score: 2

      I assume you mean tallest, not longest ;) And is Vinnufossen a waterfall or did someone leave a tap dripping? ;)

      In terms of sheer power, Iceland's easily got you beat. You have no Dettifoss, for example.

      --
      You're not made of Tuesday!
    2. Re:Waterfall Re:Down with Iceland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dettifoss

  37. airplane video by bobdevine · · Score: 2

    View the eruption from an airplane:

    http://visir.is/section/MEDIA99&fileid=CLP4238

  38. Norwegian refugees Re:Not Slavic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually Icelanders are Norwegians, peeved butthurt Norwegians that fled a fight with other Norwegians and who don't like being called Norwegians and who haven't kept up with changes in language but still Norwegians none the less :D

    And it's good fun to tease Icelanders, watch them sputter (if there's any argument to be made that they're not Norwegians it's their sputtering) and try to fight back and then we solve it all with alcohol and hugs: in some ways they're almost the same to Norway as the US is to the UK :) (except they're tiny).

    <3 from a Norwegian XD (yes yes yes I AM joking lol but Icelanders also know it's pretty much true)

    P.S. there's no Inuit or any other "natives" in Iceland and never were: ethnic Norwegians/Scandinavians/Nordics don't all look like some stereotypical blonds from Hitler's wet dreams.

    1. Re:Norwegian refugees Re:Not Slavic by Rei · · Score: 1

      Unless you're one of the Sámi people, you Norwegians are just a bunch of Germans who moved north while the Pharaohs were ruling Egypt.

      See how this silly game goes?

      --
      You're not made of Tuesday!
    2. Re:Norwegian refugees Re:Not Slavic by Plainswind · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Sami only came here around 2000 to 2500 years ago, displacing other people who lived here already(The oldest signs of settlements in Norrbotten are over 11000 years old, while the oldest sami traces are around 2500 years old) The Sami are now pushing hard for stopping archaeological digs etc in the far north. The sami themselves have been traced genetically to a region just east of the urals, though politically they do all they can to try and deny that.

    3. Re:Norwegian refugees Re:Not Slavic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Inuit influence in the Icelandic population is undeniably there. Look at people like Bjork. But it's not from indigenous people, it's from men moving back from Greenland with their Inuit wives.

    4. Re:Norwegian refugees Re:Not Slavic by Rei · · Score: 1

      Nah... Björk is part húldufólk. ;)

      --
      You're not made of Tuesday!
  39. Actually 4765 Re:2500 giraffes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Because Icelandic giraffes are kinda low and small (happens naturally on islands), but fierce, very very fierce ice giraffes.

    You don't spot an Icelandic ice giraffe*, it spots you (you might get a glimpse of it before you go to Valhall if you're lucky).

    And that is the true reason one should learn metric: the knowledge, it protects.

    * So how do we know they exist? The dying cries of anguish from their prey that's how.

  40. ** Xiggurd did it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with spellbound Icelandic ice giraffes

  41. This is their punishment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ... For banning strip clubs.

  42. to rapturous applause ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of loads of Happy Campers?

    1. Re:to rapturous applause ... by Rei · · Score: 1

      *Campers* are *juicy*.

      --
      You're not made of Tuesday!
  43. Send a drone through the ash cloud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be more use than using them to murder people.

  44. Smoke out of volcano? by baomike · · Score: 1

    I have never seen a volcano smoke. Ash, rocks, mud, steam, noxious gases yes, but no smoke.
    You want smoke you gotta burn something.
    (maybe the volcano came up thru a coal bed???) (no coal that I know of in Iceland).

    NB: Maybe trolls are surreptitiously feeding it peat.

  45. Its a hacker name by Anarchduke · · Score: 2

    Eyjafjallajokull ???
    ...you made that up by slamming your forehead into the keyboard.

    --
    who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
    1. Re:Its a hacker name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's actually a composite of three words. Eyja-fjalla-jokull which directly translates to Island-Mountain-Glacier.

  46. Streams from the volcano and more by Naphoon · · Score: 2

    Written from the inside the ash cloud, Reykjavik For those of you who are interested there are a few streams online of the volcano and surroundings. These are being set up so they are not all functional at this moment. Also dont expect to see much in all the webcams when the wind is blowing from certain directions. The ash cloud actually reached Reykjavík 26 hours after the start of the eruption, which is much fast than last summer during the eruption in Eyjafjöll. I will have to give you a few pointers in icelandic since the english version does not have a direct link to the webcams. Webpage: http://live.mila.is/ "Vefmyndavélar" means webcams so click that link. Currently the bottom three streams are of the volcanoe. "Grímsvötn" is the volcanic system "Hvannadalshnjúkur" is the mountain not far from Grímsvötn. And finally a little extra treat, a time vs richter map of the eartquakes in the area Again "Vatnajökull" is the glacier that Grímsvötn are in so you can click that for a more detailed map. Have fun.

    1. Re:Streams from the volcano and more by Naphoon · · Score: 2

      Written from the inside the ash cloud, Reykjavik For those of you who are interested there are a few streams online of the volcano and surroundings. These are being set up so they are not all functional at this moment. Also dont expect to see much in all the webcams when the wind is blowing from certain directions. The ash cloud actually reached Reykjavík 26 hours after the start of the eruption, which is much fast than last summer during the eruption in Eyjafjöll. I will have to give you a few pointers in icelandic since the english version does not have a direct link to the webcams. Webpage: http://live.mila.is/ "Vefmyndavélar" means webcams so click that link. Currently the bottom three streams are of the volcanoe. "Grímsvötn" is the volcanic system "Hvannadalshnjúkur" is the mountain not far from Grímsvötn. And finally a little extra treat, a time vs richter map of the eartquakes in the area Again "Vatnajökull" is the glacier that Grímsvötn are in so you can click that for a more detailed map. Have fun.

      Sorry, forgot the link to the earthquake site http://en.vedur.is/earthquakes-and-volcanism/earthquakes/

  47. Even though this is purely coincidentally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even though this is purely coincidentally, all the believers of the May 21 "rapture" are going to cite this as evidence.

    Umm, if they're still 'here' after May 21st, all the evidence in the world isn't going to be very persuasive.|

    And as a side note, what's with these weird Icelandic names? "Vatnajokull" sounds like something only a Scrabble fanatic would come up with.
    ------
    www.dichthuatdichthuat.com

  48. Thank goodness by codeButcher · · Score: 1

    At least they found one to erupt that looks quite pronounceable. I still haven't gotten the other one's pronunciation right.

    --
    Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
  49. volcano by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These volcano eruptions that has been happening of late, are just a sign that the world is coming to an end. What do you think of California sinking? scientist say its hanging on like honey cob. How true is that? We will find out sooner or later.

  50. Volcano's....God I love 'em! by Footsienabackyard · · Score: 1

    God's answer to killing government bureaucracies aimed at torturing industry in the name of a cure for global warming...

    --
    Don't you think...? Or don't you?