are you qualified to diagnose? i'd much more likely believe the individual that CHOOSES TO REFER TO THEMSELVES RELATIVE TO URINE is the one with something not properly hinged.
there is a large probability that you'll never not be an idiot.
why do you continue to cower behind a chosen pseudonym? why not disclose your full name and address so i can seek your help? what are you afraid of?
you were just being an idiot... because you are an idiot. you WERE confused because you ARE an idiot.
oh, because you were an idiot and i called you an idiot, that must make me someone that seeks out such idiocy and doesn't have it thrown at him as a monkey would throw their feces.
you have chosen to cower behind a chosen pseudonym.
why do you cower? what are you afraid of? are you simply too stupid to create accounts for yourself? i have the karma of a man attacked by conspiring marketeers who do not function when their lies are brought to the surface of discussion. my basement lair is 500 miles from my mother... as is the rest of my house and wife and kids and dogs and numerous firearms.
"MichaelKristopeit172" is operated by a pathetic individual attempting to steal my identity.
to the individual responsible: present yourself to me; admit what you've done, then i will bring upon you the ultimate punishment for your transgressions.
"MichaelKristopeit172" is operated by a pathetic individual attempting to steal my identity.
to the individual responsible: present yourself to me; admit what you've done, then i will bring upon you the ultimate punishment for your transgressions.
slashdot does NOTHING to limit users. you're an idiot AND a liar.
you are talking about static relative to procedural execution... i'm talking about dynamic relative to programming code... considering the claim of static typing was relative to "readable code", it is quite obvious this language is dynamically typed in those terms.
i addressed it too... it goes on and on... anything that leads to less people flying will lead to an increase of people flying who fly when less people are flying.
did your mother name you morgauxo? why do you cower? what are you afraid of?
why do you cower? what are you afraid of?
you're completely pathetic.
you're an idiot.... an ignorant hypocrite.
cower some more, feeb.
you're completely pathetic.
there is a large probability that you'll never not be an idiot.
why do you continue to cower behind a chosen pseudonym? why not disclose your full name and address so i can seek your help? what are you afraid of?
you're completely pathetic.
oh, because you were an idiot and i called you an idiot, that must make me someone that seeks out such idiocy and doesn't have it thrown at him as a monkey would throw their feces.
you have chosen to cower behind a chosen pseudonym.
you are completely pathetic.
why do you cower? what are you afraid of? are you simply too stupid to create accounts for yourself? i have the karma of a man attacked by conspiring marketeers who do not function when their lies are brought to the surface of discussion. my basement lair is 500 miles from my mother... as is the rest of my house and wife and kids and dogs and numerous firearms.
you're completely pathetic.
WHAT bad PR do you believe verizon is receiving? WIKIPEDIA IS BROKEN... this has NOTHING to do with verizon.
perhaps you are not verizon because you fear too much.
to the individual responsible: present yourself to me; admit what you've done, then i will bring upon you the ultimate punishment for your transgressions.
you're completely pathetic.
to the individual responsible: present yourself to me; admit what you've done, then i will bring upon you the ultimate punishment for your transgressions.
slashdot does NOTHING to limit users. you're an idiot AND a liar.
you're completely pathetic.
i promise you, your marketeering is pathetic.
if a type wasn't statically defined, the type isn't static... it's heuristically chosen by the underlying system.
i'm sure you don't know what type inference is.
did your mother name you morgauxo? why do you cower? what are you afraid of?
you're completely pathetic.
wrong - check
definitely pathetic.
why do you cower? what are you afraid of?
are you sure it wasn't just a "space shuttle issue"? thanks for being specific, NASA... i'm confident my tax dollars are in good hands.
there would be no software at all....
it obviously depends on the nature of the patch... many would not require much testing at all... sometimes only a single execution.