While I'm not to wild about software patents myself, your reasoning is not really usefull. After all, all ideas can be converted to very large numbers. patents forbid you to use that number, they forbid you to use that number _in that context_.
What, and make it illegal to host porn in a non.sex domain? I object to pictures of buildings, does that mean they should all be put in.building? Anyway, this is pretty much impossible to achieve anyway, because there's no way to get global legislation, not even everybody *wants* to buy a domain (yes, there are still people using just ip's), pornography is defined differently everywhere, and basicly the majority of the internet (rightly imnsho) thinks it would be stupid to take the freedom of content from some domains.
I think the 'fundies' even object to the string "XXX HOT SWEATY SEX WITH PAM".. Actually, can't say I'm to extatic about it either (but that's partially because of the all caps:-) ) but I wouldn't want to censor it.
What's the big problem? Basicly, the software vendor supports the distro stuff. And for the rest, it's: do you have libxxx installed? No? Install it. Not very hard.
/me is the happy owner of var.cx, great service these guys give. I can really recommend them, they're a lot cheaper than.com too...
Only problem (for me) is that you can't login over SSL, and they don't have (I do not like my pw going in plain text), and they don't have a pgp key for when you want to change your pw.
I doubt it, because as far as I can see the domain servers are located in england, and thus would not be subject to these rules. Anyway, the domain servers wouldn't be the ones providing 'objectionable' content.
2-3 Times the bandwith? If you're working with only 2 camera's, I'd expect 1.5-2 times the bandwith. (Because compression would work quite well, because the two images would be pretty similar).
Slashdot Mirror
I wanted to buy it, but I couldn't find buying books for dummies anywhere....
try telnet bbs.ufies.org
I went to your homepage, and one of the images alone is nearly 30kb, so I doubt it's 3199 bytes...
Try swallowing an anvil. Quite harmful, whatever it's made of.
Don't lift that curtain! There's a song underneath!
Hmmm, do you actually have a life of any sort? I mean, HOW bored must you be to post something like this... ;-)
I've quickly skimmed over the article, and as far as I can see they're talking about something more like hard links...
While I'm not to wild about software patents myself, your reasoning is not really usefull. After all, all ideas can be converted to very large numbers. patents forbid you to use that number, they forbid you to use that number _in that context_.
I'm not sure that's really what's needed, In my html guide it says TT just does monospaced, it doesn't preserve spacing.
The link's broken. Do you by any chance mean GIMPS?
Bollocks. With a warrant, that stuff is still valid. Else every criminal would hire someone to steal all the evidence against them...
I like the idea, but sadly no.... Bandwith isn't the problem, latency is... And btw, it still wouldn't help against autoaim.
Assuming you don't add engine oil (or use olive oil, yum!), where would the other stuff come from?
I think this should indeed be pure water...
Actually, IIRC india has the worlds largest movie industrie (the movies are hardly never exported though).
What, and make it illegal to host porn in a non .sex domain? I object to pictures of buildings, does that mean they should all be put in .building? Anyway, this is pretty much impossible to achieve anyway, because there's no way to get global legislation, not even everybody *wants* to buy a domain (yes, there are still people using just ip's), pornography is defined differently everywhere, and basicly the majority of the internet (rightly imnsho) thinks it would be stupid to take the freedom of content from some domains.
I think the 'fundies' even object to the string "XXX HOT SWEATY SEX WITH PAM".. Actually, can't say I'm to extatic about it either (but that's partially because of the all caps :-) ) but I wouldn't want to censor it.
What's the big problem? Basicly, the software vendor supports the distro stuff. And for the rest, it's: do you have libxxx installed? No? Install it. Not very hard.
/me is the happy owner of var.cx, great service these guys give. I can really recommend them, they're a lot cheaper than .com too...
Only problem (for me) is that you can't login over SSL, and they don't have (I do not like my pw going in plain text), and they don't have a pgp key for when you want to change your pw.
I doubt it, because as far as I can see the domain servers are located in england, and thus would not be subject to these rules. Anyway, the domain servers wouldn't be the ones providing 'objectionable' content.
I guess it all depends whether you want to stream it... :-)
2-3 Times the bandwith? If you're working with only 2 camera's, I'd expect 1.5-2 times the bandwith. (Because compression would work quite well, because the two images would be pretty similar).
I'm not complaining.... It's pretty fun, if you drink enough... I wouldn't really want it to change.
Too fast? Not from where I'm standing it isn't. :-(
I think he 'forgot' the most important reason for choosing linux: It might well get votes. (or at least be an attempt too).