you're curious about men being sexually abused by other men? you've got problems... many more than simply being wrong about every claim you've offered at no charge about me.
you feel really butthurt? i didn't complain about my situation or brag about it. i bring the truth... you bring exactly what you've claimed to be: NOTHING
i'm a PERSON with several accounts. a person named MICHAEL KRISTOPEIT.
you are a coward who hides in my shadows attempting only to dissuade those who would find insight in the truth i provide, such insight that would have a negative affect to your personal interests.
protecting such interests would be a good reason for a person to hide in anonymity, would it not?
i didn't call them friends, morons. i obviously talk to people who i would consider reprehensible idiots... such as yourself.
it makes me wonder why you put words into my mouth, and if anyone would ever consider you a friend.
to further enlighten you considering your ignorance, the people i knew worked there for 6 years in a row, 2 during high school and 4 during college, pretty much during most of their free time, and were offered a higher level position that they turned down to pursue a career in the field of their degree.
did your mother name you msauve? you're completely pathetic.
might anyone have themselves seen by a superior simply to make an unspoken impression?
the issue is not the your interpretation of the necessity of facetime or the implication of your interpretation of facetime... THE ISSUE IS WHAT SUFFICIENTLY MIGHT CONSTITUTE FACETIME TO ANYONE.
who are you to say no? who are you to define what "face time" means? face time does not imply speech. it only implies presence, and is generally used as an idiom only for UNNECESSARY presence for presences' sake... any other reasone for presence would supersede its use.
you're belief that face time has nothing to do with facebook is irrelevant to a patent judge who is deciding if mark confusion existed between trade members... or don't you consider the facebook service and face time service both in the trade of enabling communication?
you're a presumptuously ignorant hypocrite. only those made responsible for moderating this website would find insight in the uneducated drivel you provide at no cost.
Slashdot Mirror
cower some more, feeb.
you're completely pathetic.
YOU ARE RESPONDING TO ME.
why do you cower? what are you afraid of?
you're completely pathetic.
you are exactly what you've claimed to be: NOTHING.
do you cower to protect a lie, or because you're afraid of something else?
you're completely pathetic.
you are a coward who hides in my shadows attempting only to dissuade those who would find insight in the truth i provide, such insight that would have a negative affect to your personal interests.
protecting such interests would be a good reason for a person to hide in anonymity, would it not?
why do you cower? what are you afraid of?
you're completely pathetic.
it makes me wonder why you put words into my mouth, and if anyone would ever consider you a friend.
to further enlighten you considering your ignorance, the people i knew worked there for 6 years in a row, 2 during high school and 4 during college, pretty much during most of their free time, and were offered a higher level position that they turned down to pursue a career in the field of their degree.
did your mother name you msauve? you're completely pathetic.
slashdot = stagnated
the issue is not the your interpretation of the necessity of facetime or the implication of your interpretation of facetime... THE ISSUE IS WHAT SUFFICIENTLY MIGHT CONSTITUTE FACETIME TO ANYONE.
you're a presumptuously ignorant hypocrite.
you're belief that face time has nothing to do with facebook is irrelevant to a patent judge who is deciding if mark confusion existed between trade members... or don't you consider the facebook service and face time service both in the trade of enabling communication?
you're a presumptuously ignorant hypocrite. only those made responsible for moderating this website would find insight in the uneducated drivel you provide at no cost.
slashdot = stagnated
it could certainly be argued... not guaranteed every judge would see it the same way, isn't it?