bootlegging is an industry in asia, making money from all the tourists from the usa who go there on holidays and pick up movies/cds for a fraction of the price they pay back home
don't be too disappointed that the rest of the world doesn't give a fuck about mariah carey or brad pitt
reads shillish. real google bashing has swear words. only those poor shills limited by internal shill policies would say something like "good luck with those docs".
imho, both office365 and google docs can suck my hairy fat cock. who in their right mind would trust their docs to a cloud service with ridiculous boilerplate disclaimers in their tou, and hosted in a country governed by satanists of the ninth circle of hell?
linux works well for me. i started with debian and still use it with few if any problems, and mostly on old ex-windows boxes that i got handed to me, all the while there is rarely any shortage of tanked windows boxes to fix for friends and family. i would never try to convince them to use linux unless they wanted to though.
maybe a lot of people who use linux don't give a fuck about "years of the linux desktop"
as long as it rules the datacenter, big companies will support it
for non-critical apps like games, there's nothing really wrong with windows. as long as you buy oem, it doesn't even really cost much for window nowadays. anyone who is that concerned about the pittance "windows tax" needs to have a closer look at their finances
no. you're gay. libre office is more compatible with previous versions of word than the current version of word is.
and php is only bad for morons who don't know anything about programming web apps. for those morons, i recommend assp, even if only to keep your sorry whinging asses off the php forums
you apparently haven't read many of my posts, or haven't read many of apk's (well, if it were possible to actually read his posts) or you would see that i'm capable of actually constructing a full sentence
...but whatever (your response actually has some apk hallmarks)
maybe one way around it could be to lie in the interview (tell them you know adobe), and then when you're asked to produce something, install gimp, do the work, then say that you produced it with the adobe garbage. the resulting work would be the same, and surely it would be pretty hard for management to argue about the software, considering gimp is free.
only reason why someone would think any adobe graphics product is better than gimp and other foss projects is that they don't know any better. if you get fed your info from noobtards on slashdot, what do you expect. gimp is better
regardless of what journos, geologists, climatologists, etc think, i don't personally agree that CO2 is the problem, but NOx and SOx definitely are.
i'm also not convinced that taxes are necessarily the answer to tempering environmental impact, but there needs to be a financial aspect attributed because otherwise companies won't care or do anything. generating pollution either has to cost money, or not generating pollution has to make money, because money talks, and everything else walks.
i think there is enough evidence of global warming, and trying to deny it is just ignoring underlying problems. the reasons why a single chart was fudged weren't in any way corrupt (outliers, noise, interference, acquisition errors, scope of study, or merely to convey a particular aspect of the study that the otherwise non-fudged data might have confused) and shouldn't have caused a global mistrust of all global warming data. in science and engineering (i'm of the latter profession), data is adjusted/tampered/analyzed/averaged/interpolated/extrapolated all the time when producing graphs, depending on the intended audience. what shouldn't be fudged is outcomes/conclusions. saying that the merit of scientists outcomes is questionable because you saw how a pascal program works to fudge a chart is just stupid.
and the positive trend in temperature would seem to indicate global warming
Citation needed...
it was merely to highlight how ridiculous your 10 year statement was... apparently it whooshed you
But maybe that's too subtle for you.
calling me a cunt was about as subtle as one can get
except you can't (in any way) contract yourself out of statute law, at least in Australia (not sure about NY/US), and the Australian Competition and Consumer Act implies certain warranties (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Competition_and_Consumer_Act_2010#Conditions_and_Warranties_.28Division_2_and_2A_of_Part_V.29), so if you buy software for controlling a machine (for example) and the machine causes physical injury that is found to have been caused by a bug in the software, the software company would most likely be liable regardless of the license terms.
So, I don't have the expertise to read a curve, and say if it goes up or down? COME ON !!!
i couldn't have made my point any clearer than you have done if i tried. thanks for a nice demonstration of a first-class dumbass.
So everyone that do not agree with you is a moron
actually the jornos that take an internal scientific correspondence not intended for public consumption (ie intended audience is expected to have a scientific background to be able to correctly interpret its context), take said email way out of context, blather it all over front page news as a 'scoop' to increase sales, and then continue a very public and damaging campaign of mistrust in proper scientific process, downplaying the accuracy of data collected, as if his own process and opinions are more trustworthy. how much more a moron could a person be?
I just read the curve of the last 10 years. I don't care if you don't believe it, but the fact is that it's not going up!
wow i guess you can't get more scientifically definitive that that! however, i would just like to note that i just read "the curve" of the last few minutes, and the positive trend in temperature would seem to indicate global warming. i don't care if you don't believe it, but the fact is that it's not going down!
All this is silly...
not quite as silly as believing moron journos whose hype has no scientific merit. it's just a pity that more people (including politicians and business leaders) read their rubbish than do the scientific journals, so its natural that scientific reason would be drowned out by corporate media hype intended to achieve no more than increased sales.
So please don't make such assumptions
they weren't really assumptions... you made your ignorance blatantly obvious
Shit, I didn't realize you were a cunt... The discussion can stop here at this point, if you use such language
yeah cos calling someone a cunt is nowhere near as bad as calling someone ignorant. you've definitely scored the moral high ground with that one
Slashdot Mirror
gud dammit! i was ripped off! i'm orstrayan, so where's my fucking philharmonic!?
bootlegging is an industry in asia, making money from all the tourists from the usa who go there on holidays and pick up movies/cds for a fraction of the price they pay back home
don't be too disappointed that the rest of the world doesn't give a fuck about mariah carey or brad pitt
why did you pick 12? just outta curiosity
...is it weird that a lame simpsons joke hasn't appeared yet?
good luck with those docs
reads shillish. real google bashing has swear words. only those poor shills limited by internal shill policies would say something like "good luck with those docs".
imho, both office365 and google docs can suck my hairy fat cock. who in their right mind would trust their docs to a cloud service with ridiculous boilerplate disclaimers in their tou, and hosted in a country governed by satanists of the ninth circle of hell?
Software is worth what it costs
full tard
linux works well for me. i started with debian and still use it with few if any problems, and mostly on old ex-windows boxes that i got handed to me, all the while there is rarely any shortage of tanked windows boxes to fix for friends and family. i would never try to convince them to use linux unless they wanted to though.
why? cos its fun! duh!
maybe a lot of people who use linux don't give a fuck about "years of the linux desktop"
as long as it rules the datacenter, big companies will support it
for non-critical apps like games, there's nothing really wrong with windows. as long as you buy oem, it doesn't even really cost much for window nowadays. anyone who is that concerned about the pittance "windows tax" needs to have a closer look at their finances
no. you're gay. libre office is more compatible with previous versions of word than the current version of word is.
and php is only bad for morons who don't know anything about programming web apps. for those morons, i recommend assp, even if only to keep your sorry whinging asses off the php forums
you apparently haven't read many of my posts, or haven't read many of apk's (well, if it were possible to actually read his posts) or you would see that i'm capable of actually constructing a full sentence
...but whatever (your response actually has some apk hallmarks)
this is a typical gimp rant... "gimp is crap cos i don't know how to use it"
gimp developers are probably glad that adobe targets their software at noobs, so that they don't have to
probably right.
maybe one way around it could be to lie in the interview (tell them you know adobe), and then when you're asked to produce something, install gimp, do the work, then say that you produced it with the adobe garbage. the resulting work would be the same, and surely it would be pretty hard for management to argue about the software, considering gimp is free.
only reason why someone would think any adobe graphics product is better than gimp and other foss projects is that they don't know any better. if you get fed your info from noobtards on slashdot, what do you expect. gimp is better
only reason why many drugs in aus are cheap is because of subsidies like pbs
lol you're comparing litigation in australia with the us, and trying to convince us that it costs more in australia... bahahaha... what a moron
Lieben est verboten, a es scriben uts, ka liederhosen, lieben est verboten god dammit!
every company has a POS division... the VB programmers have to be put somewhere
um, those moderators who modded me "insightful" did realize i was joking, right?
i'm also not convinced that taxes are necessarily the answer to tempering environmental impact, but there needs to be a financial aspect attributed because otherwise companies won't care or do anything. generating pollution either has to cost money, or not generating pollution has to make money, because money talks, and everything else walks.
i think there is enough evidence of global warming, and trying to deny it is just ignoring underlying problems. the reasons why a single chart was fudged weren't in any way corrupt (outliers, noise, interference, acquisition errors, scope of study, or merely to convey a particular aspect of the study that the otherwise non-fudged data might have confused) and shouldn't have caused a global mistrust of all global warming data. in science and engineering (i'm of the latter profession), data is adjusted/tampered/analyzed/averaged/interpolated/extrapolated all the time when producing graphs, depending on the intended audience. what shouldn't be fudged is outcomes/conclusions. saying that the merit of scientists outcomes is questionable because you saw how a pascal program works to fudge a chart is just stupid.
and the positive trend in temperature would seem to indicate global warming
Citation needed...
it was merely to highlight how ridiculous your 10 year statement was... apparently it whooshed you
But maybe that's too subtle for you.
calling me a cunt was about as subtle as one can get
I'd be pretty mad by the 10 billionth
you would be indifferent and rigor mortis would have set in some time beforehand
and no mention of "open sores"... definitely an imposter!
you forgot to mention incomprehensible and full of acronyms (with full-stops and all!)
except you can't (in any way) contract yourself out of statute law, at least in Australia (not sure about NY/US), and the Australian Competition and Consumer Act implies certain warranties (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Competition_and_Consumer_Act_2010#Conditions_and_Warranties_.28Division_2_and_2A_of_Part_V.29), so if you buy software for controlling a machine (for example) and the machine causes physical injury that is found to have been caused by a bug in the software, the software company would most likely be liable regardless of the license terms.
So, I don't have the expertise to read a curve, and say if it goes up or down? COME ON !!!
i couldn't have made my point any clearer than you have done if i tried. thanks for a nice demonstration of a first-class dumbass.
So everyone that do not agree with you is a moron
actually the jornos that take an internal scientific correspondence not intended for public consumption (ie intended audience is expected to have a scientific background to be able to correctly interpret its context), take said email way out of context, blather it all over front page news as a 'scoop' to increase sales, and then continue a very public and damaging campaign of mistrust in proper scientific process, downplaying the accuracy of data collected, as if his own process and opinions are more trustworthy. how much more a moron could a person be?
I just read the curve of the last 10 years. I don't care if you don't believe it, but the fact is that it's not going up!
wow i guess you can't get more scientifically definitive that that! however, i would just like to note that i just read "the curve" of the last few minutes, and the positive trend in temperature would seem to indicate global warming. i don't care if you don't believe it, but the fact is that it's not going down!
All this is silly...
not quite as silly as believing moron journos whose hype has no scientific merit. it's just a pity that more people (including politicians and business leaders) read their rubbish than do the scientific journals, so its natural that scientific reason would be drowned out by corporate media hype intended to achieve no more than increased sales.
So please don't make such assumptions
they weren't really assumptions... you made your ignorance blatantly obvious
Shit, I didn't realize you were a cunt ... The discussion can stop here at this point, if you use such language
yeah cos calling someone a cunt is nowhere near as bad as calling someone ignorant. you've definitely scored the moral high ground with that one