Yes, that's exactly the problem. It's like you didn't see major female lead action movies very often, Black Widow figures were hard to find... And then Wonder Woman came along and suddenly Hollywood realizes that a movie starring a woman and directed by a woman can actually do pretty well. Now there are more of them coming, maybe even a Black Widow solo movie after the other core Avengers all got them.
Also, is 60 Minutes really supposed to be about chasing ratings, or should there be an element of trying to do the right thing or draw attention to important issues even if it means a few people tune out? "Ratings" are a pretty lame excuse.
I don't know 60 Minutes but from what I read it's a heavyweight long-form bit of journalism, meant to enlighten the viewer and maybe even push the discussion forward a bit by providing a forum to air views on the subject, as well as to investigate.
So it's kinda sad that it's apparently failing so badly to do that. Society needs good journalism to inform and question and reveal, otherwise it's just partisans on soap boxes.
Whoever spends it first wins, basically. The wallet just contains crypto keys that relate to an amount in the shared ledger of accounts, anyone with the key can transfer that money.
Maybe they mean he moved the wallet file off the computer 8 months ago. You can transfer ownership of cryptocurrency offline by giving someone else the wallet file, and obviously the public ledger has no record of it.
The timeframe could be determined by email timestamps, file access timestamps, logs, all sorts of things.
Whitlisting Javascript won't actually protect you from this, not entirely. For example the site can use CSS to load a different resource based on your browser window size, which the server can log along with your IP address.
It's extremely difficult to block everything that could be used to identify a browser. A better technique is to poison the data, making it unreliable and ever-changing.
In the 2013 Sim City game the zero tax trick actually works. You can create a libertarian paradise with no electricity, no water, no roads, no refuse collection, no services at all and 0% tax. People will be 100% satisfied.
This is how we make advanced technology affordable. Sell some rich people a wireless TV, gain manufacturing and engineering experience, let them do the real-world testing to save on R&D.
Assuming you can cut into the wall, i.e. it's not a rented property and you have hollow walls. In Europe a lot of people have solid walls, not drywall mounted on studs.
It's for easy wall mounting. No need to cut two holes in the wall to hide the cables.
In fact maybe no need to modify the wall at all, which would be great for people in rented apartments. LG already have a magnetically mounted TV, and I wonder if you could use the metal in a stud wall or some kind of removable adhesive metal sheet. Or maybe just fit the drywall with the metal sheet attached inside.
I use a magnetic mount for my phone in my car. It's better than any suction mount, never falls off even with a heavy phone and cables attached.
Samsung will probably offer what you want, based on their current tablets and XL phones. Their pen is top notch, they support annotating documents. I would be strange if they removed that functionality from a foldable version of the Galaxy Note, for example.
But then again it is Samsung, they sometimes make some very strange choices.
This is both a flawed understanding of surveys and a flawed understanding of how EU democracy works.
There have been calls for this from elected EU representatives for years. The survey was just to gauge public opinion. That more responses came from Germany isn't really an issue - you can just break it down by country and look at ratios individually, while also accounting for the fact that participants were self-selecting.
The way TFA phrases it is just to create some drama. In reality all those smaller states have a veto over this, but they probably won't oppose it in the end. They will compromise, maybe ask for some cash to help with the transition. They of course accept that being in a democracy means compromising, and getting the greater benefits of EU membership in exchange.
I think they are just primed to launch into their anti-SJW diatribe any time anything to do with race or skin colour comes up. Maybe it's deliberate, maybe it's some kind of programmed Pavlovian response. Either way someone is pushing that narrative.
Actually that whooshing sound was my mocking of Styopa, who seems to assume that "SJWs" are always making it about racism, but in fact he is the only one making that claim. He's outraged at imaginary outrage, and the only one doing the thing he is complaining about other people doing.
So if they had permission to transport the body back to Canada then where's the funeral or at least the Canadian funeral home who cremated it?
Despite a death certificate from Indian authorities and a statement of death from a Nova Scotia funeral home
Are you saying there should also be a certificate of cremation or burial that is publicly available in Canada? I don't know how the system works there.
He doesn't really have $137M though. He has cryptocurrency that is worth around that amount, or at least was before this happened and people lost faith in it.
Converting that into usable currency is not going to be easy, especially as the ledger is public. He will need to launder it. Obviously taking out millions is going to be a massive red flag now.
The whole point of being on DST permanently is to not get up any earlier and shift that hour of daylight to the evening. People don't care so much if they go to work in the dark, they want their own personal time to be in daylight.
It's possible to privatize-proof orgs. The NHS is somewhat protected, for example, but there is no reason why there couldn't be some kind of constitutional lock to prevent it too. Well, in the UK it would likely take the form of legislation that required a significant parliamentary majority, say 3/4ths, which would be politically very difficult to subvert.
The EU is under-represented in the UK. In other countries you see it everywhere - anything funded by EU money has an EU flag on it, and institutions are proud to mention that they are doing stuff with or funded by the EU. The media is much more engaged with what the EU is doing and doesn't consider it a separate organization, it's another democratic institution along side the national government.
That's why the UK was so vulnerable to brexit. People really thought it was like some kind of club they could just cancel their membership of and walk away. Someone guy on the TV was talking about how upset he was because he thought that a few days after the vote the UK would be out - he didn't even read the official Leave campaign's leaflet apparently.
Yep, it's a well understood issue. It's why it's important to have dark skinned people represented on TV and in movies - it helps everyone get used to it.
Now watch the push-back against an easy, simple solution.
Slashdot Mirror
Yes, that's exactly the problem. It's like you didn't see major female lead action movies very often, Black Widow figures were hard to find... And then Wonder Woman came along and suddenly Hollywood realizes that a movie starring a woman and directed by a woman can actually do pretty well. Now there are more of them coming, maybe even a Black Widow solo movie after the other core Avengers all got them.
Also, is 60 Minutes really supposed to be about chasing ratings, or should there be an element of trying to do the right thing or draw attention to important issues even if it means a few people tune out? "Ratings" are a pretty lame excuse.
I don't know 60 Minutes but from what I read it's a heavyweight long-form bit of journalism, meant to enlighten the viewer and maybe even push the discussion forward a bit by providing a forum to air views on the subject, as well as to investigate.
So it's kinda sad that it's apparently failing so badly to do that. Society needs good journalism to inform and question and reveal, otherwise it's just partisans on soap boxes.
Whoever spends it first wins, basically. The wallet just contains crypto keys that relate to an amount in the shared ledger of accounts, anyone with the key can transfer that money.
The Vote Leave one proposed to negotiate a future trade agreement and all other matters relating to leaving before triggering Article 50.
What's the difference between permanent DST and just permanent non-DST with everyone getting up an hour earlier?
The cartoons finish before I get home from work.
You have a faulty memory.
Thanks, that post was a TL;DR rant but you managed to find the humour in it. Gave me a good chuckle.
Maybe they mean he moved the wallet file off the computer 8 months ago. You can transfer ownership of cryptocurrency offline by giving someone else the wallet file, and obviously the public ledger has no record of it.
The timeframe could be determined by email timestamps, file access timestamps, logs, all sorts of things.
Whitlisting Javascript won't actually protect you from this, not entirely. For example the site can use CSS to load a different resource based on your browser window size, which the server can log along with your IP address.
It's extremely difficult to block everything that could be used to identify a browser. A better technique is to poison the data, making it unreliable and ever-changing.
In the 2013 Sim City game the zero tax trick actually works. You can create a libertarian paradise with no electricity, no water, no roads, no refuse collection, no services at all and 0% tax. People will be 100% satisfied.
It really wasn't a very good game.
This is how we make advanced technology affordable. Sell some rich people a wireless TV, gain manufacturing and engineering experience, let them do the real-world testing to save on R&D.
Assuming you can cut into the wall, i.e. it's not a rented property and you have hollow walls. In Europe a lot of people have solid walls, not drywall mounted on studs.
It's for easy wall mounting. No need to cut two holes in the wall to hide the cables.
In fact maybe no need to modify the wall at all, which would be great for people in rented apartments. LG already have a magnetically mounted TV, and I wonder if you could use the metal in a stud wall or some kind of removable adhesive metal sheet. Or maybe just fit the drywall with the metal sheet attached inside.
I use a magnetic mount for my phone in my car. It's better than any suction mount, never falls off even with a heavy phone and cables attached.
Samsung will probably offer what you want, based on their current tablets and XL phones. Their pen is top notch, they support annotating documents. I would be strange if they removed that functionality from a foldable version of the Galaxy Note, for example.
But then again it is Samsung, they sometimes make some very strange choices.
This is both a flawed understanding of surveys and a flawed understanding of how EU democracy works.
There have been calls for this from elected EU representatives for years. The survey was just to gauge public opinion. That more responses came from Germany isn't really an issue - you can just break it down by country and look at ratios individually, while also accounting for the fact that participants were self-selecting.
The way TFA phrases it is just to create some drama. In reality all those smaller states have a veto over this, but they probably won't oppose it in the end. They will compromise, maybe ask for some cash to help with the transition. They of course accept that being in a democracy means compromising, and getting the greater benefits of EU membership in exchange.
I hope not.
I think they are just primed to launch into their anti-SJW diatribe any time anything to do with race or skin colour comes up. Maybe it's deliberate, maybe it's some kind of programmed Pavlovian response. Either way someone is pushing that narrative.
Actually that whooshing sound was my mocking of Styopa, who seems to assume that "SJWs" are always making it about racism, but in fact he is the only one making that claim. He's outraged at imaginary outrage, and the only one doing the thing he is complaining about other people doing.
Am I missing something?
So if they had permission to transport the body back to Canada then where's the funeral or at least the Canadian funeral home who cremated it?
Despite a death certificate from Indian authorities and a statement of death from a Nova Scotia funeral home
Are you saying there should also be a certificate of cremation or burial that is publicly available in Canada? I don't know how the system works there.
Just like advanced degrees and doctors diplomas in the US, only cheaper. You don't still get spam from fake US schools offering them?
He doesn't really have $137M though. He has cryptocurrency that is worth around that amount, or at least was before this happened and people lost faith in it.
Converting that into usable currency is not going to be easy, especially as the ledger is public. He will need to launder it. Obviously taking out millions is going to be a massive red flag now.
Someone didn't think this through.
The whole point of being on DST permanently is to not get up any earlier and shift that hour of daylight to the evening. People don't care so much if they go to work in the dark, they want their own personal time to be in daylight.
It's possible to privatize-proof orgs. The NHS is somewhat protected, for example, but there is no reason why there couldn't be some kind of constitutional lock to prevent it too. Well, in the UK it would likely take the form of legislation that required a significant parliamentary majority, say 3/4ths, which would be politically very difficult to subvert.
Not perfect but definitely possible.
The EU is under-represented in the UK. In other countries you see it everywhere - anything funded by EU money has an EU flag on it, and institutions are proud to mention that they are doing stuff with or funded by the EU. The media is much more engaged with what the EU is doing and doesn't consider it a separate organization, it's another democratic institution along side the national government.
That's why the UK was so vulnerable to brexit. People really thought it was like some kind of club they could just cancel their membership of and walk away. Someone guy on the TV was talking about how upset he was because he thought that a few days after the vote the UK would be out - he didn't even read the official Leave campaign's leaflet apparently.
Yep, it's a well understood issue. It's why it's important to have dark skinned people represented on TV and in movies - it helps everyone get used to it.
Now watch the push-back against an easy, simple solution.