> promoting bogus "man-made global warming" theories
Why do you think the theory is bogus? Do you doubt the extraordinary spike in greenhouse gasses since the beginning of the industrial revolution? Do you think the spike was caused by something else? Do you doubt the physics of the greenhouse effect? Is there some other problem with the theory?
> Now that I don't have to worry about waking up in a bathtub full of ice with only one kidney. Since we can just grow them in some chimera monstrosity.
> I've always been intrigued by Feynmann's conjecture that there's only one electron, which moves so fast that it appears in all the times/places in the universe that appear to be individual electrons.
I've always wondered where physicists get their drugs.
> It has exploded several times, and in more recent times has been erupting about once every 600K years. The fact that the last explosion was 640K years ago can lead to some sobering thoughts.
Especially when you realize that it will never need more than 640K.
> Seriously, could someone please explain to me one more time how it is that this man was even re-elected? Just how stupid is America?
Americans tend to get pretty f'ing stupid when someone promises to make them wealthier or safer. (Or 3" longer, though the politicians haven't caught on to that one yet.)
> Such is the corrupt grip that monied interests have on our nations leaders and senators, it seems the only way to solve this problem comes down to two choices. 1)Allow public funding of political parties or 2) make every wannabee politician take a vow of poverty, like church leaders did back in the Dark Ages. Of the two, the latter is the only sensible option.
A third option would be to hand over the money to someone who would spend it wisely, such as me.
> Why does the BBC continue to publish this drivel? This is about the 5th article where some git has come up with a "mathematical formula" for something which is complete drivel. First it was "the perfect joke", then "the perfect horror movie", and "the perfect family game", then I think we had "murphy's law".
Wonder when they'll get to "the perfect Slashdot post".
Which is the greater risk - leaving our tinfoil hats on and having them focus the effects of this in our brains, or taking them off and subjecting ourselves to mind control from the black helicopter people?
Getaway car peels out, leaving rubber on the pavement. The tread pattern is perfectly preserved in the squeal mark. (They even see a black spot from a nail in the tire.)
In the morgue, they push some kind of putty into a stab wound in the body cavity, and pull out a cast showing the shape of the blade that made the wound (down to the detail of a broken tip),
Other gripes about CSI and all the other recent crime shows I've watched:
Culprit always fesses up at the end.
Script writers seem to be competing to out-do one another in terms of how sleazy they can make the backstory of the murder.
> promoting bogus "man-made global warming" theories
Why do you think the theory is bogus? Do you doubt the extraordinary spike in greenhouse gasses since the beginning of the industrial revolution? Do you think the spike was caused by something else? Do you doubt the physics of the greenhouse effect? Is there some other problem with the theory?
Please be specific.
> Insteead, there seems to be largely a grab for grant money and political power, as opposed to real science
Fortunately, we've got some big altruistic corporations ready to intervene on behalf of our best interests.
The next story on a conference about climate change may look like a dupe, but isn't really.
Unless, of course, they dupe this one first...
> Now that I don't have to worry about waking up in a bathtub full of ice with only one kidney. Since we can just grow them in some chimera monstrosity.
But now the chimeras will be after your kidneys.
> However, the article does mention that the goals of one of the studies is to create mice with 100% human brains.
And the other mouse will be called "Pinky".
> The game is interesting when people play it because people have a huge amount of trouble actually being random.
Some of our moderators are pretty good at it...
> I've always been intrigued by Feynmann's conjecture that there's only one electron, which moves so fast that it appears in all the times/places in the universe that appear to be individual electrons.
I've always wondered where physicists get their drugs.
Just be glad he toned it down from the original "Ragnarok looms in MGM v. Grokster!!!"
What is this "respect for copyright" you speak of?
> Except that the earth is only about 4000 years old and fossils were put there to test our faith, right?
More likely they were put there to test our intelligence.
> It has exploded several times, and in more recent times has been erupting about once every 600K years. The fact that the last explosion was 640K years ago can lead to some sobering thoughts.
Especially when you realize that it will never need more than 640K.
> What I wished I had known:
Sex
Girls want it as bad as guys do.
Time spent on the clit has a great ROI.
17yo's are best, but you've got to collect it before you're 18.
The guys that brag the most aren't really getting any.
If a man catches you bonking his daughter you might as well keep on humping, 'cause he's going to be madder than hell anyway.
Santa Claus is gay.
> > I should have never given Dick Cheney that time machine. I was not aware of the mischief he was capable of.
> As long as he doesn't go off the path and step on a butterfly, things shouldn't get much worse...
Unfortunately, he couldn't resist the temptation to cut down a tree, and it fell on a butterfly.
> Luck favors the bold. - Virgil
> Luck favors the well prepared. - Pasteur
Luck favors the lucky.
> I guess it makes it even worse that it was purely a human error.
Yeah, someone screwed up in converting 'A' to metric.
> Seriously, could someone please explain to me one more time how it is that this man was even re-elected? Just how stupid is America?
Americans tend to get pretty f'ing stupid when someone promises to make them wealthier or safer. (Or 3" longer, though the politicians haven't caught on to that one yet.)
> Such is the corrupt grip that monied interests have on our nations leaders and senators, it seems the only way to solve this problem comes down to two choices. 1)Allow public funding of political parties or 2) make every wannabee politician take a vow of poverty, like church leaders did back in the Dark Ages. Of the two, the latter is the only sensible option.
A third option would be to hand over the money to someone who would spend it wisely, such as me.
> Well, he garnered the most votes, IIRC. How's that royal family of yours coming along?
LOL.
> Why does the BBC continue to publish this drivel? This is about the 5th article where some git has come up with a "mathematical formula" for something which is complete drivel. First it was "the perfect joke", then "the perfect horror movie", and "the perfect family game", then I think we had "murphy's law".
Wonder when they'll get to "the perfect Slashdot post".
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_24
Thanks... that long list of dead people cheered me right up.
Which is the greater risk - leaving our tinfoil hats on and having them focus the effects of this in our brains, or taking them off and subjecting ourselves to mind control from the black helicopter people?
Doesn't SCO know about kernel.org?
> thinks immortality could be within our grasp by 2030
Isn't the world supposed to end in 2029?
> The thing I hate most about CSI is...
A couple of recent "I hates" that come to mind:
Getaway car peels out, leaving rubber on the pavement. The tread pattern is perfectly preserved in the squeal mark. (They even see a black spot from a nail in the tire.)
In the morgue, they push some kind of putty into a stab wound in the body cavity, and pull out a cast showing the shape of the blade that made the wound (down to the detail of a broken tip),
Other gripes about CSI and all the other recent crime shows I've watched:
Culprit always fesses up at the end.
Script writers seem to be competing to out-do one another in terms of how sleazy they can make the backstory of the murder.
> Porn to the rescue, yet again!
Porn is like God: it helps those who help themselves.