Slashdot Mirror


User: MichaelKristopeit351

MichaelKristopeit351's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
46
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 46

  1. do you Need to be mocked for your cowardice? on Ask Slashdot: Do We Need Pseudonymous Social Networking? · · Score: -1

    you're completely pathetic

  2. Re:text of RMS's mail on Emacs Has Been Violating the GPL Since 2009 · · Score: -1
    ur mum's face doesn't completely make sense.

    you're an idiot.

    cower in my shadow some more behind your chosen mobile disrepute based pseudonym, feeb.

    you're completely pathetic.

  3. Re:Make the best browser on Firefox Is For "Regular" Users, Not Businesses · · Score: -1
    ur mum's face is an asshole.

    Since I quite my day job last year to take on a degree, I have consulted

    you're an idiot.

    cower in my shadow some more behind your chosen unilluminated based pseudonym, feeb.

    you're completely pathetic.

  4. Re:Make the best browser on Firefox Is For "Regular" Users, Not Businesses · · Score: -1
    you quite your job?

    you do understand that consultants aren't usually given access, or made to understand, every single internal processes, no?

    you are quit ignorant.

  5. Re:AZ isn't anti-immigrant on LulzSec Posts First Secret Document Dump · · Score: -1
    NCSU did you a great disservice.

    you're an ignorant hypocrite.

    the US legal system is based on the constitution. harassing citizens and demanding their papers is "following" the nazis.

  6. Re:AZ isn't anti-immigrant on LulzSec Posts First Secret Document Dump · · Score: -1
    the state highway patrol was also on the scene and didn't seem to mind the violation of my constitutional rights .

    arizona condones the border patrols actions and actively enables them .

  7. Re:charity? on 17-Year-Old Wins Intel's $100K Science Prize · · Score: -1
    you're an idiot .

    cower in my shadow behind your chosen spent energy pseudonym some more, feeb.

    you're completely pathetic.

  8. Re:no process on How Facebook Ships Code · · Score: -1
    cower some more, feeb.

    you're completely pathetic.

  9. Re:/.ed on How Do You Visualize 100 GB of Google Text Data? · · Score: -1
    i've never seen rhetoric equated with "news"... because RHETORIC IS NOT NEWS.

    i never claimed to "hate" this site. you're an ignorant hypocrite who choses to put words in the mouths of others while attacking them for those very words.

    why do you cower? what are you afraid of?

    you're completely pathetic.

  10. Re:LOL, your export FAILS, hilarious... apk on The Significant Decline of Spam · · Score: -1
    in the context of cowering, feeble individuals who do not offer or present their real world identity, perhaps...

    i am michael kristopeit.

    you're exactly what you've claimed to be: NOTHING

    cower some more, feeb.

    you're completely pathetic.

  11. Re:LOL, your export FAILS, hilarious... apk on The Significant Decline of Spam · · Score: -1
    tough doesn't mean tough? you're an idiot. you're also an Internet Idiot.

    ur mum's face have never handled a firearm.

    attempt some more lies. cower in my shadow.

    you're completely pathetic.

  12. Re:These are the people who run our government on Kneber Botnet Strikes, Targets Gov't Agencies · · Score: -1
    yes, people who are capable of faltering on the side of trust have their fingers on the missile launch buttons that could destroy us all.

    you'd rather some paranoid recluse who cowers behind a chosen pseudonym be given the responsibility?

    cower some more, feeb.

    you're completely pathetic.

  13. Re:Maybe mobile DEVICES are more vulnerable on Mobile Users More Vulnerable To Phishing Attacks · · Score: -1
    i have never cowered.

    why do you cower? what are you afraid of?

    you're an ignorant hypocrite.

  14. Re:Maybe mobile DEVICES are more vulnerable on Mobile Users More Vulnerable To Phishing Attacks · · Score: -1, Funny

    maybe you should consider the implications of the transitive property.

  15. Re:See YA! on Interactive, Emotion-Detecting Robot Developed · · Score: -1
    who is "we"?

    you are NOTHING.

    you obviously can't make me leave.

    why do you cower? what are you afraid of?

    you're completely pathetic.

  16. Re:Sad... on Windows Phone 7 Marketplace Hack Demonstrated · · Score: -1
    ur mum's face'll suck his dick.

    why do you cower? what are you afraid of?

    you're completely pathetic.

  17. Re:A question of cash... on Windows Phone 7 Marketplace Hack Demonstrated · · Score: -1
    have you considered blowing yourself up? it would eliminate the necessity of yours to be given what you need.

    cower some more, feeb.

    you're completely pathetic.

  18. Re:Sad... on Windows Phone 7 Marketplace Hack Demonstrated · · Score: -1
    ur mum's face are not.

    cower behind your chosen waste based pseudonym some more, feeb.

    you're completely pathetic.

    i live at 4513 brittany ct. eau claire, wi 54701. present yourself to me; admit what you've done, then i'll bring upon you the ultimate punishment for your transgressions.

  19. Re:Unethical! on Democrats Crowdsourcing To Vote Palin In Primaries · · Score: 1
    i can easily understand how an ignorant hypocrite would be sick of being called as such.

    what part of "just" do you think applies to A COMPLETE LACK OF MORALS?

    you're an idiot.

    cower some more, feeb.

    you're completely pathetic.

  20. Re:Terrible, terrible and juvenile summary. on New IE Zero Day · · Score: 1
    as you continue to respond to me, you hypocritically ignore the fact that i have stated i seek nothing. no thing. not anything. you're an idiot

    ur mum's face're crying because you know you don't have it.

    cower some more, feeb.

    you're completely pathetic.

  21. Re:Unethical! on Democrats Crowdsourcing To Vote Palin In Primaries · · Score: 1

    has the republican party taken responsibility for "Operation CHAOS"? were any "Operations" not named "Operation CHAOS" orchestrated by the republican party? were any "Operations" orchestrated independently? are you claiming that no member of the republican party voted for Obama in the primary as a political tactic?