Slashdot Mirror


User: Ranger+Rick

Ranger+Rick's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
608
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 608

  1. Re:Screen Res. and text? on The new Palm VIIx · · Score: 1
    Plus I imagine a Palm/Visor screen is less strain on the eyes than a Pocket PC.

    I've got both a PalmPilot IIIx and a Cassiopieia E-115; after using the Pocket PC for a month, I have to say that for the most part, the Palm kicks it's ass for getting real work done. If I can find graffiti for WinCE it may be a bit of a closer race; that popup keyboard is nowhere near as good as graffiti. However, there are a few things I find myself using the Pocket PC for that it is very good at:

    1. The screen is MUCH better than the Pilots. Reading books on it is many times better.
    2. MAME doesn't run on the Pilot. (grin)
    3. I can't help it. I run that one program Microsoft made that is actually any good at all. Solitaire.

    But no matter what, it's not a waste. I can't wait to put NetBSD on my E-115. :)

    :wq!

  2. Re:Linux in a box? on Linux In A Box · · Score: 1
    (shameless plug)

    or, there's DJ In A Box.

    :)

    :wq!

  3. Re:autoexec.bat on Windows ME - The End Of UMSDOS And BeOSfs Over Vfat? · · Score: 2
    autoexec.bat and config.sys are there only for backwards compatibility. It scans them at boot time and puts their information into the registry and empties them out.

    :P

    :wq!

  4. Re:the biggest problem with RPM... on File Packaging Formats - What To Do? · · Score: 1
    RPM differs in none of these things. RPMs can be unpacked using cpio, and source RPMs contain pristine source and separate patches.

    The biggest difference is that RPM does not seem to handle dependencies as well.

    :wq!

  5. Re:Looks intersting on XFree & Rendering · · Score: 1
    Are you asserting here that anti-aliased text would somehow be stored differently in the clipboard than non-anti-aliased text?

    What he's saying is if you do anti-aliased text the "old way" of rendering pixmaps and pushing them out, there's no longer any "text" to be selected in the clipboard. It's just an image.

    :wq!

  6. Re:what would i do? on Multi-Head Gaming · · Score: 1
    you need to look up the word "facetious".

    Nice try. Didn't you know the word "facetious" isn't in the dictionary?

    :D

    :wq!

  7. Re:486?? on 486 PC In 5 Cubic Inches? · · Score: 1
    Yeah? Try loading Solaris 2.6 onto a Sparc IPX. Then tell me about 'mean'. :)

    :wq!

  8. Re:Great resource! on Classic Browsers Given New Life · · Score: 1
    Actually, the trick to running 2 versions is to install the 16-bit (windows 3.1) version of IE alongside the latest and greatest.

    At least, it used to work, I haven't done any heavy web design lately. But at one point, I had IE4, IE3 (16-bit), Opera, Lynx, Netscape 1.1, Netscape 2.02, Netscape 3.0something (whatever the last one was), and Netscape 4.0something installed on the same machine for testing. :)

    :wq!

  9. Re:Old browser archive on Classic Browsers Given New Life · · Score: 1
    Another important browser in the development of the web was SlipKnot, that let Windows 3.1 users piggyback on Lynx running through a shell account, in case their ISP didn't provide or charged extra for SLIP/PPP accounts.

    Hahah, yeah. My first internet connection was this weird box thing that piggybacked on our phone line at the dorms at Purdue (forget what they're called). It was a 19,200 uncompressed connection that took us right to a terminal, so no PPP.

    I used slipknot for a while on it until I figured out how to get slirp working (anyone remember slirp?! Emulated a slip connection over a terminal... I seem to recall seeing that it's still being developed... ahh yeah, here it is.)

    Hell, it was worth installing slirp just so you could compress the damn 19,200 connection. Damn, those were the days.

    :wq!

  10. Re:Enough emulation. on Plex86 Runs DOS · · Score: 1
    Of course, those of us who knew better have been using external modems, and don't have compatibility problems. :)

    :wq!

  11. Re:What to do with it? on Specs On New SGI Onyx And Origin · · Score: 1
    You know what would be cool is a troll slashbox. It would find all the good trolls and put them in a slashbox for you for easy perusal. :)

    :wq!

  12. Re:Solaris on Benchmarks of *BSD, Linux, and Solaris at LinuxTag · · Score: 1
    Solaris doesn't really do well until you give it more than 1 processor.

    :wq!

  13. Re:Well duh! on Benchmarks of *BSD, Linux, and Solaris at LinuxTag · · Score: 1
    Whup, looks like I spoke too soon. :)

    :wq!

  14. Re:Well duh! on Benchmarks of *BSD, Linux, and Solaris at LinuxTag · · Score: 1
    The thing that shocked me was that it looks like Linux NFS did really well, when I thought the NFS stack was always considered to be pretty hacked up.

    :wq!

  15. Re:Perl Sux! on Unhappiness Surrounding Perl 6 Announcements · · Score: 1
    Or, perhapse you should have posted your reason for thinking it sucks, instead of not backing up your comment.

    :wq!

  16. Re:what does this change? on Hidden-Feature DVD Players Again · · Score: 1
    I'm sorry, I may have missed it, but did you mean "weasels on fire", or "homosexual weasels"? I would appreciate clarification.

    :wq!

  17. Re:Clarification on First Look At The New Palms · · Score: 1
    Yeah, and since when is a 25% small screen a feature? :)

    :wq!

  18. Joke on Quickies from OLS - les Quickies d'OLS · · Score: 3
    Q: What did the deadhead say when he ran out of pot?

    A: "Man, this band sucks!"

    :wq!

  19. Re:Kama Sutra on Quickies from OLS - les Quickies d'OLS · · Score: 1
    Damn, and here I thought it would be a link to goatse.cx, and for once it would have been ontopic! :)

    :wq!

  20. Re:But most consumer-abusive Internet Edge. on Privacy, Part Two: Unwanted Gaze · · Score: 1
    Neat! You have it published somewhere? Or are we allowed to look? :)

    :wq!

  21. Re:But most consumer-abusive Internet Edge. on Privacy, Part Two: Unwanted Gaze · · Score: 1
    Going by the name, I would expect that someone fed all of JohnKatz's stuff to MegaHAL or somesuch.

    :wq!

  22. Re:RedHat ? on Miguel Says Unix Sucks! · · Score: 1
    Whups, add a in there. :)

    :wq!

  23. Re:RedHat ? on Miguel Says Unix Sucks! · · Score: 1
    Bad workers usually complain about their tools

    The best translation I've heard is "It is a poor worksman who blames his tools.", and I am very fond of that phrase. :)

    :wq!

  24. Re:Perl uses smarter text algorithms than most peo on Larry Wall Announces Perl 6 · · Score: 1
    Oh, you mean this?

    Oh, sorry, that's C. C++ can't use C, can it? ;)

    :wq!

  25. Re:wow... on Larry Wall Announces Perl 6 · · Score: 1
    The perl compiler has worked OK on linux for a while now, but just recently with 5.6.0 I was able to get it to work on HP-UX, so they've obviously made some changes.

    Yay!

    :wq!