I actually downloaded the trial a while back. Personlly, I liked it alot. It *is* a lot like iPhoto, but there are quite a few different or additional features. It's also quite snappy. In my experience, it felt quite a bit faster than iPhoto.
I live and work in Lincoln. If you look on her site, in addition to having pics of her at the bar, there are pictures of her topless in an alley in downtown Lincoln. That alley happens to be next to my office, you can't tell in the thumbnails (she used to link to the full size pics), but it is *definitely* our alley. Just to be clear, it's about 15 feet from my desk. According to her, she took the pics during the day on a monday, and we all missed it! I'm not sure how... but we did. We even have several large windows overlooking the alley. Oh well.
"..Buy a PC and install Microsoft software on it. For a large server, you'll need Windows NT, and the software license will cost about as much as the server. Microsoft has a solutions and best practices Web page (see Resources below) that states that you can expect to move about 6 gigabytes (GB) a day from three Compaq ProLiant 5000s or 5500s with four Pentium Pro processors and 512 megabytes (MB) of memory each. In order to maintain availability, Microsoft recommends that you install multiple systems with failover.
Buy a PC and install FreeBSD on it. The hardware would appear to cost the same, but you don't pay anything for the software. In fact, as the hardwareconfiguration for wcarchive.cdrom.com shows, this is misleading. wcarchive is only a single system with a single CPU, also a Pentium Pro. In contrast to Microsoft's 6 GB of downloads per day, however, it routinely transfers more than 700 GB of data a day for to up to 3,600 concurrent users. This is over 100 times the performance of three larger Windows NT machines combined. On December 2, 1998, wcarchive transferred 820,097,694,368 bytes of data, making it the busiest FTP server in the world."
Slashdot Mirror
I actually downloaded the trial a while back. Personlly, I liked it alot. It *is* a lot like iPhoto, but there are quite a few different or additional features. It's also quite snappy. In my experience, it felt quite a bit faster than iPhoto.
The software used to be around $30. This whole 'free' thing seems to be a new development.
> Maybe you should request she do a re-shoot?
:)
We already tried that... She said she'd stop in next time
I live and work in Lincoln. If you look on her site, in addition to having pics of her at the bar, there are pictures of her topless in an alley in downtown Lincoln. That alley happens to be next to my office, you can't tell in the thumbnails (she used to link to the full size pics), but it is *definitely* our alley. Just to be clear, it's about 15 feet from my desk. According to her, she took the pics during the day on a monday, and we all missed it! I'm not sure how... but we did. We even have several large windows overlooking the alley. Oh well.