No! It can't be! paying a resource 10k USD/yr to replace a 70k/yr resource offers a lot of incentive to skirt the rules. You would have thought that the sub-standard work would have been outrageous enough, but companies keep offshoring.....
I have had the chance to speak with other business owners and some executives of, let's just say, large, corporations. The general feeling is that while action was necessary there was a much better approach:
- ~500 billion USD given to the Fed - Allow the Fed to disperse the money through the discount window with loans at 1% fixed for 18 months then reset to Prime-0.5% - All mortgages that are currently in MBS tranches have their rates reset to Prime+1 for 24 months. - Have the US AG seek felony charges for lenders that committed fraud.
The current bill is like trying to get fuel into a car through the tailpipe instead of filling up the gas tank.
then I have this week. And by republican i mean REAL republican, not a neo-con like in recent years. Regardless of the fact that some house republicans were going to vote for it, it was enough in the end that an individual's ego made them stick to their principles.
You're selling your examples too short. Ford had numerous other models to keep momentum going. MS first had dos, then windows, then office, then exchange.
Cherry-picking examples is not clever. If you're going to use analogies then use them correctly. Google's first big money maker was adwords.....we are still waiting for the next thing.
Ford's was the Model T, then the next Model, then all the other cars they made. MS made money with ms-DOS, then with windows, then with office, then with exchange.
See my point yet? If not, my point is that the other companies you used as examples have multiple cash-flow positive products/services. Google has only one.
No but you need to be a Google employer, beneficiary, partner, affiliate or stock owner to make excuses for their history of shortcomings and business ineptitude. IANATroll, but if they didn't have adwords they would have been bankrupt or acquired 6 years ago.
But she didn't conduct any official business with the yahoo account! All that was in it were family pictures and emails to her friends. IMO, she did the correct thing by not using a govt.-paid for email account for personal communications.
Also, by the fact that you falsely stated she conducted "official business" with the yahoo account, I cannot help but think you have some type of bias, as why else would you blatantly falsify information???
For example, TWS has java binding and even a local DDE server do you can write crap in Excel. God help you if you have triggers sent form Excel Macros....
I understand that the submitter doesn't know what is out there, but if you ever have a trading account you're likely to have API access to your broker's systems. I recommend Interactive Brokers as their TWS software has a lot of different language bindings.
In finance you don't look for "FOSS" tools, you go to your broker, get API access, and write them yourself.
A Jihad precludes all "learning" that you think the terrorists should do. You cannot apply your reasoning, education and beliefs to how religious extremists behave, it will only cause you to draw malformed conclusions.
Which has a boatload of problems. The fact is there is enough competition in the market that just being able to be a hypervisor is not enough - you need to measure up and offer proprietary advantages.
The reason this release is not a big deal is that VMWare spanks the performance of every other hypervisor. VMWare ESX networking is magnitudes ahead of every single other competitor in the benchmarks.
You can by SunSPOT dev kits for a few hundred bucks. People have already build p2p networks with them. Exciting enough to remind us of the old XeroxPARC days.
IBM has a strangle-hold on the high-margin mainframe world. This is causing issues in the Big Blue God Pod right now, be certain.
Tesla was a genius, and at least 3 generations ahead of his time.
QED.
No! It can't be! paying a resource 10k USD/yr to replace a 70k/yr resource offers a lot of incentive to skirt the rules. You would have thought that the sub-standard work would have been outrageous enough, but companies keep offshoring.....
I have had the chance to speak with other business owners and some executives of, let's just say, large, corporations. The general feeling is that while action was necessary there was a much better approach:
- ~500 billion USD given to the Fed
- Allow the Fed to disperse the money through the discount window with loans at 1% fixed for 18 months then reset to Prime-0.5%
- All mortgages that are currently in MBS tranches have their rates reset to Prime+1 for 24 months.
- Have the US AG seek felony charges for lenders that committed fraud.
The current bill is like trying to get fuel into a car through the tailpipe instead of filling up the gas tank.
then I have this week. And by republican i mean REAL republican, not a neo-con like in recent years. Regardless of the fact that some house republicans were going to vote for it, it was enough in the end that an individual's ego made them stick to their principles.
Why is Arnold not doing something about this?
You're selling your examples too short. Ford had numerous other models to keep momentum going. MS first had dos, then windows, then office, then exchange.
Cherry-picking examples is not clever. If you're going to use analogies then use them correctly. Google's first big money maker was adwords.....we are still waiting for the next thing.
Ford's was the Model T, then the next Model, then all the other cars they made. MS made money with ms-DOS, then with windows, then with office, then with exchange.
See my point yet? If not, my point is that the other companies you used as examples have multiple cash-flow positive products/services. Google has only one.
No but you need to be a Google employer, beneficiary, partner, affiliate or stock owner to make excuses for their history of shortcomings and business ineptitude. IANATroll, but if they didn't have adwords they would have been bankrupt or acquired 6 years ago.
In 3....2.....1......
MOD PARENT UP.
But she didn't conduct any official business with the yahoo account! All that was in it were family pictures and emails to her friends. IMO, she did the correct thing by not using a govt.-paid for email account for personal communications.
Also, by the fact that you falsely stated she conducted "official business" with the yahoo account, I cannot help but think you have some type of bias, as why else would you blatantly falsify information???
yes, that is exactly what I'm saying.
For example, TWS has java binding and even a local DDE server do you can write crap in Excel. God help you if you have triggers sent form Excel Macros....
I understand that the submitter doesn't know what is out there, but if you ever have a trading account you're likely to have API access to your broker's systems. I recommend Interactive Brokers as their TWS software has a lot of different language bindings.
In finance you don't look for "FOSS" tools, you go to your broker, get API access, and write them yourself.
A Jihad precludes all "learning" that you think the terrorists should do. You cannot apply your reasoning, education and beliefs to how religious extremists behave, it will only cause you to draw malformed conclusions.
Parent is a Tree-hugging Troll.
MOD PARENT INSIGHTFUL!
not based on our experiences.(first-hand) We don't even offer Xen because of its performance issues under load.
http://www.vmware.com/pdf/hypervisor_performance.pdf
http://www.vmware.com/pdf/Multi-NIC_Performance.pdf
You can google the rest for yourself, I'm sure.
Which has a boatload of problems. The fact is there is enough competition in the market that just being able to be a hypervisor is not enough - you need to measure up and offer proprietary advantages.
The reason this release is not a big deal is that VMWare spanks the performance of every other hypervisor. VMWare ESX networking is magnitudes ahead of every single other competitor in the benchmarks.
No one ever got fired for choosing IBM.
most of the nyse stuff that's important will be on AIX, but I guess you don't need to read articles, just post links...
Any company that includes Linux is RTP/STP should go out in the street with them. Though at least you got Solaris correct.
I did say -nearly-, i think it was late 02 that the project was released, so development was at least several months prior.
As for cost, it's all economies of scale. You can get SPOTs cheaper in bulk, though you are correct, the SPOTs do a much broader array of things.
Sun.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_SPOT
Java, ftw.
You can by SunSPOT dev kits for a few hundred bucks. People have already build p2p networks with them. Exciting enough to remind us of the old XeroxPARC days.
In chrome the location ":%" apparently blows the thing up.
Has nothing to do with mysql, other then the fact that google is planning on putting a lite sql db into chrome to facilitate gears.