Isn't it a bit unprofessional to have adware (possibly spyware) with Rogaine advertisements in the top bar of internet explorer while documenting Cisco webpage browsing? Check out the screenshots of the webpages in his Cisco textbook "Learning by doing" and you'll know what I'm talking about...
These products could certainly compete with the RFID tagging industry if cost and size were appropriate for the application. RFID tags have problems with near-field RF effects and antenna polarity. These devices would seem to be more effective since they are communicating over spread spectrum, then IP packets and not directly over narrow band carrier waves
Sounds like a policy problem rather than an issue American's should be concerned with. Hopefully you can spare some bandwidth to email your ISP and complain.
From tests I've done in the past with DVD quality streaming, wireless networks such as 802.11b can not support the throughput required. I've had DVD's max out at 13 MB/s. 802.11b can only send 11 Mb/s not including overhead which is greater than 802.3 in the first place...
I'm sure we all remember the prototype versions of UWB before the FCC ruling....5 Watts covering 3 GHz of spectrum? Even this small amount of power wiped out a brand new handheld GPS unit in a 100 foot range. I would think that NASA tested this equipment since no new prototypes are even released yet bearing the new frequencies imposed.
As a result, I agree that there is still a long way to go before an answer is found...
I have significant disbelief in this guy's theory. A signal from a phone radiates at 1/2 a watt less than 3 inches from your head, which is accepted by international telecommunications union (ITU) as an acceptable power level for safe use. At the respective frequencies that cell phones use, the power degrades by 1/2 (or 3dB) every few inches. If EVERYONE in a train car used their phone at the same time and at a precise location that created positive interference to one specific user, all the other users (assuming about 100 passengers) would have to use their phones about 10 feet away (considering multipath too). This guy is full of it or he must feel the need for more attention.
Judging by the link (provided in the headlines above) from NOAA, the kP level (6) for Illinois is too low to see the Aurora. You could drive north for about 6 hours and you might get a shot.
Slashdot Mirror
Sounds like a hell of a nice screen protector for the nano
Peculiar, the user keeps scrolling through songs as if it were more fun than listening to music...
It was funnier before Randy Moss changed my perspective about this phrase...
Isn't it a bit unprofessional to have adware (possibly spyware) with Rogaine advertisements in the top bar of internet explorer while documenting Cisco webpage browsing? Check out the screenshots of the webpages in his Cisco textbook "Learning by doing" and you'll know what I'm talking about...
These products could certainly compete with the RFID tagging industry if cost and size were appropriate for the application. RFID tags have problems with near-field RF effects and antenna polarity. These devices would seem to be more effective since they are communicating over spread spectrum, then IP packets and not directly over narrow band carrier waves
Sounds like a policy problem rather than an issue American's should be concerned with. Hopefully you can spare some bandwidth to email your ISP and complain.
What's to prevent a certain (possibly slighlty unethical) person from breaking a few FCC violations & double dipping on a few of these babies....
From tests I've done in the past with DVD quality streaming, wireless networks such as 802.11b can not support the throughput required. I've had DVD's max out at 13 MB/s. 802.11b can only send 11 Mb/s not including overhead which is greater than 802.3 in the first place...
I'm sure we all remember the prototype versions of UWB before the FCC ruling... .5 Watts covering 3 GHz of spectrum? Even this small amount of power wiped out a brand new handheld GPS unit in a 100 foot range. I would think that NASA tested this equipment since no new prototypes are even released yet bearing the new frequencies imposed.
As a result, I agree that there is still a long way to go before an answer is found...
I have significant disbelief in this guy's theory. A signal from a phone radiates at 1/2 a watt less than 3 inches from your head, which is accepted by international telecommunications union (ITU) as an acceptable power level for safe use. At the respective frequencies that cell phones use, the power degrades by 1/2 (or 3dB) every few inches. If EVERYONE in a train car used their phone at the same time and at a precise location that created positive interference to one specific user, all the other users (assuming about 100 passengers) would have to use their phones about 10 feet away (considering multipath too). This guy is full of it or he must feel the need for more attention.
time to invest in the UPS companies - can you imagine the power backup needed?
ok, maybe that's 2 words
Judging by the link (provided in the headlines above) from NOAA, the kP level (6) for Illinois is too low to see the Aurora. You could drive north for about 6 hours and you might get a shot.
Is her nickname going to be pronounced Celex, Celes, or Celus?