Slashdot Mirror


Professor Creates His Own Cisco Manual

yootje writes "ZDnet is running a story about a professor who made his own Cisco networking textbook, with 800 pages: "Computing instructor Matt Basham's suggestions for improving Cisco Systems' official training manuals fell on deaf ears for years. But he appears to have the networking giant's attention now." The professor made his book available for free on his website."

318 comments

  1. This should happen more often by slusich · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's great to hear a story about someone who took it upon himself to do what was needed. Cisco was obviously not responsive to him, so he goes out and does it on his own. Not only that, he decides to share his work with everyone. Now hopefully Cisco has the common sense not to sue him for his efforts.

    1. Re:This should happen more often by MoonFog · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sue him for what exactly? He wrote the book and unless he's plagiarised some of its content, then they wouldn't have much of a case. Given his profession, I'm sure he's more than capable of writing this book on his own.
      He's the owner of the material, and I seriously doubt that he can be sued for anything at all.

    2. Re:This should happen more often by Short+Circuit · · Score: 4, Interesting

      How about republishing Cisco's API without their permission? Cisco probably likes the revenues they get from selling their docs and their training manual.

    3. Re:This should happen more often by MoonFog · · Score: 1

      But has he done that? My point was that they cannot sue him just for publishing a book, he must violate some copyright if that's to be the case. Could Deitel be sued for publishing books on Java and .Net?

    4. Re:This should happen more often by slusich · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In this day and age, with the current laws on our books, the fact that he hasn't really done anything to get sued for doesn't mean they won't sue him.

    5. Re:This should happen more often by Short+Circuit · · Score: 0

      Java and .Net are ECMA standards...AFAIK, there are no restrictions on the republishing of the API.

      Cisco's software is completely different. Add to the fact that they may not normally allow unlicensed books about their software, and you've got a sticky situation.

      (I don't know if you have to get a license to publish a book detailing their software...but for major piece of software well known in the industry, I wouldn't be surprised if they pushed for the revenue.)

    6. Re:This should happen more often by gmack · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "About half the people in this program barely know how to turn on a computer, so we need to start with the very basics. The Cisco curriculum and texts assume a certain level of knowledge."

      I'm not so sure this is the best idea hes dumbed down the manual to make room for the computer illiterate.. shoehorning students with no technical background into a network administration course seems like a bit of a waste.

      There is a lot to be said for having a sepperate class to teach the basics.

    7. Re:This should happen more often by Short+Circuit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In this day and age...

      In this day and age, laws are irrelevant. You just have to be able to financially afford more time in court.

      Scratch the "in this day and age" part, though...it's always been true.

    8. Re:This should happen more often by Jayfar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Huh?! What API? Unless your considering router configs as application programs, there is no API. And there are literally hundreds of books written about cisco configuration, beyond those published by/for cisco.

    9. Re:This should happen more often by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1, Interesting

      API has become a catch-all term that covers anything having to do with an interface to controlling software.

      And in a day when configuration files are written in scripting languages for everything from video games to "./configure", I don't see a problem with that.

    10. Re:This should happen more often by thammoud · · Score: 4, Informative

      Neither Java nor .Net are EMCA standards. C# is.

    11. Re:This should happen more often by farzadb82 · · Score: 5, Informative
      "Java and .Net are ECMA standards"

      I don't know where you got your info from but Java is NOT ECMA standardized and as for .net, only the CLR and C# langauge are ECMA standardized.

    12. Re:This should happen more often by gkuz · · Score: 1
      Cisco was obviously not responsive to him, so he goes out and does it on his own

      Not responsive in what way? In not publishing the CCNA coursework for free? This is not some revolutionary text where none ever existed, it's a CCNA study manual. There are literally dozens of these, from every technical publishing house known to man, including Cisco Press. His is just cheaper than the others.

      I don't get what Cisco is supposed to be contrite about. They publish and print textbooks for courses they design. They don't want to give them away for free. That's their choice.

    13. Re:This should happen more often by slusich · · Score: 1

      He wasn't asking them to give away their texts. He was suggesting improvements. Things he saw, as a teacher which would improve the texts. That's what Cisco ignored.

    14. Re:This should happen more often by BigBir3d · · Score: 5, Informative

      RTFA:

      <quote>Before publishing the book on his own, Basham said he had contacted Cisco Press about publishing it, but it wasn't interested. After his free book appeared online last week, however, the company contacted him via e-mail requesting a meeting to discuss the program at St. Petersburg College.

      Company spokeswoman Goodwin said that Cisco is always looking for ways to improve the program.

      She said that although instructors are required to teach the Cisco Academy curriculum, they are welcome to supplement it as necessary. She also emphasized that none of the Cisco Academy students are required to buy any of the textbooks from Cisco.

      "Cisco has a long-standing relationship with St. Petersburg College," she said. "And we have a process-oriented quality assurance program with the (Cisco) Academy where we work collaboratively with institutions to solicit feedback. We are continually making improvements based on customer needs."</quote>

      Cisco obviously thinks this is as cool as most of us think it is.

    15. Re:This should happen more often by MoonFog · · Score: 4, Informative

      Cisco's software is completely different. Add to the fact that they may not normally allow unlicensed books about their software, and you've got a sticky situation.

      What you're basically saying is that you cannot write about how you configure a Cisco router? What about books like these ? I would be very surprised if Cisco demanded licencse from the "Dummies" series, just as an example.

      And just to add to what the others have said, Java and VB .Net are not ECMA standards. Sun has kept a tight grip around Java so as not to loose control over it, there are still hundreds of books available on Java.

    16. Re:This should happen more often by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've confused Java with JavaScript.

      -C

    17. Re:This should happen more often by amaffew · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Thanks guys...I am not a lawyer but have spent several years studying copyright and internet law...I even got the opportunity to lead a session at Harvard Law School one summer. Heck, one of the professors there, Johnathon Zittrain, even downloaded the book...he's an old-school chat room moderator turned internet lawyer...he and his colleagues have even taking pro-bono work to fight for open source rights. I think I have sufficiently covered my assets with respect to the book...it has actually been out for three years and I haven't heard anything so far. Besides I put some really specific phrases in there that help cast aside their chances. Thanks again. I will go out and read all the posts too. You should see the one on www.macpro.se that appeared in swedish! Gratis lärobok för Ciscos kurser Thanks again Matt PS if you download the book shoot me an email and let me know where you are located...I am keeping track on a map. Bashamm@spcollege.edu

    18. Re:This should happen more often by amaffew · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's actually a bit of a misquote...the people who come here are expected to know their way around a desktop and the internet...those are both very vital skills to succeed. We do tell them to go take the entire AS degree plan too...the A+, MCP, 2 courses in Linux, the CCNA and the CCNP (plus gen ed stuff)...Matt

    19. Re:This should happen more often by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Maybe his suggestions was crap. Ever seen Homer Simpson's car design? Sometimes there's a good reason why people ignore your contribution, as good as you think it is, hit yourself in the head with a shovel and move on in life.

    20. Re:This should happen more often by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you got your info from but Java is NOT ECMA standardized

      My guess is its the standard let's-confuse-Java-with-JavaScript. You would not believe the number of times I've realised half-way through a conversation that the other party is really talking about a scripting language.

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
    21. Re:This should happen more often by mwood · · Score: 3, Insightful

      TFA reports cisco as saying that they don't make any money off the training materials. Those are a cost of doing business, where in this case "doing business" is growing the market by turning out CCNAs and CCNPs. It's good to see a company remembering what its actual products are.

      And their product manuals are available for free on their site. Another wise investment, and a very inexpensive one.

      About the only areas where he'd have to be careful is others' copyrighted material (as mentioned above) and use of others' trademarks. Prof.s learn early how to avoid those problems or they don't remain prof.s very long.

      Now, if cisco didn't like this, they *could* apply pressure through the institution's relationship with them as a training site. But it sounds like they are going to avoid PR disaster and work with the author instead of against him. Good for them. I and my shares approve of listening to customers' concerns about our documentation.

    22. Re:This should happen more often by cdogg4ya · · Score: 1

      For those who haven't opened the document yet, this "textbook" was written for the CCNA 640-607 exam which is RETIRED. The current version of the CCNA exam is 640-801 (or the 604-811/821 for the anal retentive). Still its a good start and reference material.

    23. Re:This should happen more often by k98sven · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How did this seriously strange view of IP law get modded up?

      You don't need permission from anybody to publish an API. There is no special copyright law covering API specifications.

      Perhaps you are thinking of trade-secret status?
      Well, if something has been publicly published, it doesn't doesn't get trade-secret status. And that goes even if they put some silly 'license' on their documentation.
      (See for instance the BSDi case, where the Unix sources were found not to have trade-secret status without even being public, but simply because they had been seen by so many people. And that is despite the fact that they even had written agreements with all of them.)

      You don't have to get a license to publish an original book on anything, ever.

      Do you know what a license is? A license is permission from a rights-holder to exercise an otherwise exclusive right.

      For copyright, that means performing, reproducing and creating derivatives of copyrighted material.

      For patents, that means the right to manufacture and use the invention.

      For trade-secrets, that means the right to divulge and use commercially the trade secret.

      Now, if I chose not to publish my API secret, then it may be a trade-secret, in which case you may not have the right to publish it if you happen to be 'in' on it. APIs can however be reverse-engineered. You can reverse-engineer an API without any trade-secret knowledge (i.e. 'clean-room') and publish that, that is perfectly legal.

      Perhaps you think that the API itself can be copyrighted, and that a description of the API is a derivative work? Well, that's a theory, but very dubious legally.

      Under copyright law, code is separated into the "expressional" and "functional" parts, and APIs reasonably always fall into the latter part, and are therefore not copyrightable. In case law, good room is generally given for compatibility code, being functional. (Again, you can see the BSDi case, where it was found that header files describing the same Unix API were not infringing)

      If the API itself is not copyrighted, something which has yet to be seen, the description of the API cannot be a derivative work.
      Naturally, the description itself can be copyrighted, including the official description, (e.g. the API specification) but anyone can write their own description.

    24. Re:This should happen more often by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      DOH! That's what I get for staying up all night. I can't believe I said that.

    25. Re:This should happen more often by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You new here? Let's see, you're claiming that if Cisco doesn't "have much of a case", they wouldn't or couldn't (or shouldn't?) bring suit. Yeah, that makes sense, and completely reflects reality. All law suits must make sense and be well-grounded in truth, only the good guys win, people always play fair, the little guy has just as much chance at justice as the big corporations, etc., etc., etc.

    26. Re:This should happen more often by Suppafly · · Score: 1

      Now hopefully Cisco has the common sense not to sue him for his efforts.

      I read an article about this a few weeks ago when it was still news, and basically cisco could care less if he makes his own supplemental material as long as he teachs the whole course as laid out by the cisco requirements.

    27. Re:This should happen more often by rolling_bits · · Score: 1

      That's terrible.

    28. Re:This should happen more often by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem isn't copyright; it's DMCA.

      Since once could concievably create an application to maliciously target Cisco routers by studying the API, the publishing of said API is forbidden by the DMCA.

      Security through obscurity.
      Freedom through ignorance.
      Liberty through obedience.

      The Ashcroft is your friend.

    29. Re:This should happen more often by n3bulous · · Score: 1

      Homer could barely drive, let alone design a car. This guy is a professor (which doesn't necessarily mean he can teach...) who appears to know his way around Cisco hardware. The chances of his suggestions being crap are fairly small. Big business is essentially known for ignoring suggestions from their customers.

      However, half his target audience supposedly does not know how to turn on computers, and that scares me... The positive thing is this manual should present the information in a much more readable format than the free-as-in-sucky Cisco docs.

      --
      "The area of penetration will no doubt be sensitive." ~ Spock
    30. Re:This should happen more often by jpmkm · · Score: 1

      No it hasn't. APIs are used when writing a program to interface with another program. I doubt many configuration scripts deal with APIs.

    31. Re:This should happen more often by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      Thank you. You have described the flaws of the SCO case quite well.

      How does the rubbish you refute get modded up on Slashdot? Have we been invaded by SCO trolls?

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    32. Re:This should happen more often by kfg · · Score: 1

      You can reverse-engineer an API without any trade-secret knowledge (i.e. 'clean-room') and publish that, that is perfectly legal.

      It's simpler than that. You don't even need a clean room to simply describe something, even patented and licensed somethings.

      Ever read a Hayne's auto repair manual?

      They don't use drawings. They take a car apart and take pictures of the actual parts and proceedures of various repairs, publish full specs, graphs, etc.

      They don't need permission from nobody, nohow.

      If they need specifications of a patented part they can get them directly from the United States Patent Office because the the design is public information.

      God save us all from the day when you can get sued/arrested for telling a friend about a cool movie you saw, which is all this guy is doing.

      KFG

    33. Re:This should happen more often by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      I work at a web agency, doing server-side Java development - servlet and jsp work, essentially. It's the bulk of the development we do.

      You'd be surprised (and dismayed, probably) how many times people *here* have got the two confused. Not techy-types, of course, but sales, consultants and even project managers over the years...

    34. Re:This should happen more often by McDutchie · · Score: 1
      [...] APIs can however be reverse-engineered. You can reverse-engineer an API without any trade-secret knowledge (i.e. 'clean-room') and publish that, that is perfectly legal.

      I'm not doubting you, but then how come that closed-source license agreements almost invariably prohibit reverse-engineering? Does this mean those license agreements are unenforcable?

    35. Re:This should happen more often by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "as for .net, only the CLR and C# langauge are ECMA standardized."

      Which is like saying "as for C++, only the C++ language and the standard library are standardized".

    36. Re:This should happen more often by scrytch · · Score: 1

      > About the only areas where he'd have to be careful is others' copyrighted material (as mentioned above) and use of others' trademarks.

      You mean like "Cisco", or "IOS", or "Catalyst"?

      They're going to sue him into oblivion. Actually they'll just wave lawsuits at the university and they'll force him to pull his manual.

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    37. Re:This should happen more often by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not doubting you, but then how come that closed-source license agreements almost invariably prohibit reverse-engineering? Does this mean those license agreements are unenforcable?

      Essentially, yes, I believe so. It's a topic of much debate, but Vault Corp. vs. Quaid Software Ltd. in 1988 found that the prohibition of reverse-engineering in an EULA was preempted by federal copyright law.

      It makes sense; Copyright law gives you the right to reverse-engineer. As I said, essentially, licenses are for granting rights (however limited), but not for taking them away.

      (Disclaimer: This does not constitute legal advice ;-) )

    38. Re:This should happen more often by k98sven · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Popular misconception on Slashdot.
      I don't like the DMCA, but you should read exactly what it prohibits.

      The DMCA prohibits "circumvention of copyright protection systems". No matter how you look at it, that's a very different thing from a general ban on reverse-engineering.

      The most draconian interpretation possible is to assume that it prohibits reverse-engineering of copyright protection measures. But that's it. And it explicitly allows circumvention for interoperability purposes.

      Without getting farther into the issue, an API cannot reasonably be interpreted as a copyright protection measure. And reverse-engineering isn't necessarily circumvention.

      So it's really not an issue at all in this case.

    39. Re:This should happen more often by k98sven · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's simpler than that. You don't even need a clean room to simply describe something, even patented and licensed somethings.

      No you don't, but you need to know what it is you are describing.
      I was thinking along the lines of (say) of undocumented Windows APIs.
      Leaving anti-trust issues aside, and just assuming that these undocumented APIs had trade-secret status, a Microsoft employee could not publish them without consent from MS. And everyone else couldn't 'just know' what they were.

      So you'd then have to reverse-engineer them, and to do so legally, not use any priviliged information. And indeed, it's been done, without MS being able to do anything about it.

      Auto parts is no problem, they're protected by patents as you noted, and patents are a stronger form of protection:
      There is no economic threat in having all information public (indeed patent applications are public), because noone else is allowed to make or use the part (for the given purpose) without license.

    40. Re:This should happen more often by mwood · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And the University's lawyers will laugh at them, unless he used those trademarks in such a way as to promote his own business. Your local newspaper can't be sued for trademark infringement just for printing an article mentioning the company or its products by name.

      If he'd called it _The Official cisco Systems New CCNA/CCNP Training Book_ then they'd likely have grounds for complaint.

    41. Re:This should happen more often by kfg · · Score: 1

      Trade secrets have no protection at all except by explicit contract. None.

      APIs are inherently nothing more than a logical framework. One does not reverse engineer them. One discovers them.

      Reverse engineering means writing code that impliments the API. That, and only that, has to be done "clean room," and only because the code is copyrighted.

      KFG

    42. Re:This should happen more often by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach.

      He has taken the first step to doing!

    43. Re:This should happen more often by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Or if you don't want to read the whole thing, the key sentence is:


      V. Conclusion

      We hold that: (1) Quaid did not infringe Vault's exclusive right to reproduce its program in copies under 106(1); (2) Quaid's advertisement and sale of RAMKEY does not constitute contributory infringement; (3) RAMKEY does not constitute a derivative work of Vault's program under 106(2); and (4) the provision in Vault's license agreement, which prohibits the decompilation or disassembly of its program, is unenforceable.
    44. Re:This should happen more often by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello, moderators? +5 informative? Rather -5 Completely Offtopic! Slashdot moderation system really could use some changes, when I browse that +5 I'd actually want to see only ontopic things and actually worth the +5.

    45. Re:This should happen more often by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

      Sounds to me like they saw his free book competing with their own stuff, so scrambled to get him back on board after they found he published it himself anyway.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    46. Re:This should happen more often by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The CLR is the byte code interpreter, of which there isn't exactly an equivalent in C++, and the "standard library" for C# isn't entirely standardized by ECMA by my understanding. A lot of the .Net framework is proprietary, Windows specific or burdened by patents which will most likely eventually be used to squash any non-Microsoft implementations like Mono. The equivalent in the C++ world is that while C++ and the standard libraries are standardized by ANSI, Microsoft's APIs and class libraries like MFC are proprietary and Windows specific to the point where writing portable code between Windows and non-Windows platforms is hardly trivial. It seems highly likely that Microsoft will use litigation to make the same thing true of .Net and C#.

    47. Re:This should happen more often by macdaddy · · Score: 1

      You don't need a license to write about and publish a book on a Cisco product. I don't need a license to write about and publish a detailed take-apart for a 2004 Chevy Silverado Duramax diesel engine. I don't even need a license to write about and publish every technical aspect of the latest greatest Intel processor provided I did all of this through my own research.

    48. Re:This should happen more often by k98sven · · Score: 1

      Trade secrets have no protection at all except by explicit contract. None.

      Right. But Microsoft and most others put explicit trade-secret clauses in their employment contracts.

      APIs are inherently nothing more than a logical framework. One does not reverse engineer them. One discovers them.

      That wouldn't really be in tune with the more common definition of reverse-engineering. Reverse-engineering would typically entail using a decompiler/disassembler/debugger to figure out the inner workings of a program, and then writing a specification from that.

      Yes, the actual implementation is the clean-room part, but that's ordinary forward-engineering from a specification, not reverse-engineering. H

      owever, the person who did the reverse-engineering has seen the other guy's code, and is therefore not clean anymore.

    49. Re:This should happen more often by kfg · · Score: 1

      Right. But Microsoft and most others put explicit trade-secret clauses in their employment contracts.

      Of course.

      That wouldn't really be in tune with the more common definition of reverse-engineering.

      Sure it would:

      For example, one might take the executable code of a computer program, run it to study how it behaved with different input and then attempt to write a program oneself which behaved identically

      Reverse engineering is the process of creating a workalike product. Sure, you need to analyze its behavior to do that, but it's not the whole thing. Until you write the code, you havn't reverse engineered it. Just like taking a car apart might tell me how it works, but isn't reverse engineering the car. It's just education about the car.

      I'd never use a decompiler/et al to reverse engineer something. I'd do as in the above defintion. I'd analyze its behavior. What input gives what output. To reverse engineer Solitaire, for example, one need only play the game a few times. The same goes for an RTS, FPS or spreadsheet. If you know what the code does you can do it too.

      Decompiling is cracking. Bad engineer. No Doritos.

      KFG

    50. Re:This should happen more often by k98sven · · Score: 1

      No, you cited an example, not the actual definition.

      The "writing your own program" part is not part of the definition.

      And no, it does not neccesarily mean decompiling. Decompiling is only one method of reverse-engineering. Examining the program by comparing input/output is another one.
      Perhaps you'd never use a decompiler to reverse-engineer anything, but I'm guessing that you haven't either. There are many cases in which you can't use that method, or that method is simply to difficult.

      But the actual code-writing is not part of the reverse-engineering process. Writing code is engineering. You're not reversing anything!

      It's called 'reverse-engineering' because engineering is the process of going from an idea to a concrete thing, like an actual program or a bridge or a car.
      Reverse-engineering is the study of the engineering product in order to figure out which ideas were behind it, reversing the process. Hence the name.

      Some real-life examples:
      Samba is an implementation of the Windows SMB protocl based on reverse-engineering. This was done through packet analysis, not through decompilation. It is therefore also 'clean room', because they haven't seen any actual code.

      Hatari, an Atari ST emulator I've contributed to, has emulation of the Atari hard drive hardware which I coded after reverse-engineering the hard-drive interface protocol. Not having an actual Atari hard-drive to test on, or a full protocol spec, I did this through disassembling and studying the driver software. It is not clean-room, since I saw the other guy's code.

      (However this is not a legal problem, because A) I didn't implement a driver, rather I implemented the 'hardware' part in software. and B) I didn't use any of their code and C) Nobody cares anymore anyway.)

      Classpath, an reimplementation of the Java class libraries, is 'clean room'. Sun distributes its sources to these, but noone is allowed to contribute to Classpath if they have seen them, or if they've decompiled them. The Classpath project itself is not reverse-engineering. Although some reverse-engineering is probably done by means of writing small test programs to clarify omissions from Suns Java Specification.

      Decompiling is not in itself cracking. "Cracking" depending on what meaning you chose, can mean many things, among others the removal of copy protection from software.
      I've did so myself back in my Atari years. Cracking is a form of reverse-engineering, and usually (but not always) entails using a disassembler. The only difference between cracking and traditional reverse-engineering is the intent.

      And in the USA this is also a legal difference: The DMCA prohibits reverse-engineering with the intent to circumvent a copyright-protection device. It expressly allows it in order to achieve interoperability.

      If you're European, you can look at directive 91-250-EEC of the EEC (now EU), Article 6. This legislation has been implemented in laws of all member states, and it expressly allows decompilation for interoperability purposes.

  2. Eeeeek... by Noryungi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's a 5.1MB Microsoft Word file.

    Oh the horror... The horror...

    Please, Mr Matt Basham, release this as a PDF, RTF or HTML file... Anything but Word. I ma willing to help if needed.

    --
    The right to offend is far more important than the right not to be offended. (Rowan Atkinson)
    1. Re:Eeeeek... by Trigun · · Score: 3, Funny

      Once you're done slashdotting it, I'll see what I can do to convert it.

      OpenOffice save as PDF rocks.

    2. Re:Eeeeek... by mhifoe · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you already have Word, PDFCreator can give better results.

    3. Re:Eeeeek... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 3, Informative

      Be sure to change it to a readable set of fonts first...non-anti-aliased text in PDFs is just plain ugly.

      Also...I've noticed that sometimes opening Word documents created in OpenOffice end up with "unsupported characters" everywhere. What causes that?

    4. Re:Eeeeek... by Trigun · · Score: 1

      Ugly file format in Word.

    5. Re:Eeeeek... by October_30th · · Score: 2, Informative
      Oh the horror... The horror...

      And why is that? You can download a free Word viewer here.

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    6. Re:Eeeeek... by millahtime · · Score: 2

      the free word viewer is for M$ windows. what if your on another platform?

    7. Re:Eeeeek... by komejo · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you register at Lulu, the free download is a PDF.

    8. Re:Eeeeek... by Guillermito · · Score: 1

      Really? Does it run on different platforms (as Acrobat Reader, or other PDF viewers do)?

    9. Re:Eeeeek... by Threni · · Score: 1

      I don't mind that it's Word - but why doesn't he zip the bloody thing? It'll probably fit on a floppy that way. Perhaps he has bandwidth to burn?

    10. Re:Eeeeek... by Minwee · · Score: 5, Funny
      "It's a 5.1MB Microsoft Word file."

      So it's only three pages long? Somehow I expected more.

    11. Re:Eeeeek... by RLiegh · · Score: 1
      the free word viewer is for M$ windows. what if your on another platform?

      wine

      crossover office

      vmware

      There's also antiword and a few other programs that are floating around which claim to be able to read MS Word format (haven't tried 'em so I can't say).

    12. Re:Eeeeek... by jetnet · · Score: 1

      I have converted this over to a PDF if anyone wants it. http://downloads.tusclan.com/index.php?op=moreinfo &fileid=1763

    13. Re:Eeeeek... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wine
      crossover office
      vmware


      And how many of those run on OS/400?

    14. Re:Eeeeek... by term8or · · Score: 1

      Why not send him the offer by email, rather than write it on /. ? He might actually see it that way.

      --



      "As a writer / novelist you might want to spellcheck your sig. :) " - AC
    15. Re:Eeeeek... by amaffew · · Score: 1

      Yes...no problem...the one on my website is a word doc...the one on Lulu.com/learningbydoing is a PDF file...plus the newest version will be available in a PDF file too. Thanks for the offer! Matt (Mr. is my dad)

    16. Re:Eeeeek... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you provide me with detailed chart of the times Adobe is evil and the times it is not? I'm trying to cope with the masses, but it's getting confusing.

      BTW Is it okay to buy DVDs today, or is it the day to throw Molotov cocktail firebombs at RIAA/MPAA front door? Keep us updated. We want to be cool too!

    17. Re:Eeeeek... by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      If you register at Lulu, the free download is a PDF.

      Wow, Lulu.com is Slashdotted already... There must be a pretty huge demand for this book. I know I haven't been CCNA certified since version 1 of the test (they are up to 3 now), but I'm downloading the Word version because someday I'd like to update that certification.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    18. Re:Eeeeek... by sckeener · · Score: 1

      "It's a 5.1MB Microsoft Word file."

      So it's only three pages long? Somehow I expected more.


      ah, but just look at the metadata! It was written by Netgear!

      --
      "Only one thing, is impossible for god: to find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." Mark Twain
    19. Re:Eeeeek... by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      The thing about it is that really good Cisco doc is hard to come by. I think a lot of people like myself are hoping that this will be good. I never intend to take the test but I'm just grabbing it cause I hope it will be good doc.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    20. Re:Eeeeek... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And how many of those run on OS/400?

      Giraffe
    21. Re:Eeeeek... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      OpenOffice save as PDF rocks.

      BAH!

      Every program on the program that can print, can output a PostScript format file. All you need is ghostscript installed (on Unix, Windows, Mac, etc) and use their command-line tools to convert that PS file to a PDF. You can choose the image quality, etc.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    22. Re:Eeeeek... by nacturation · · Score: 1

      the free word viewer is for M$ windows

      Hark! The 90's are calling. They want their cheesy Microsoft abbreviation back.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    23. Re:Eeeeek... by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1
      print to a file. Then use ps2pdf in cygwin, or on a linux box.

      To the original poster, I have had issues with the .pdfs created by open office. They open fine in windoze, but many times do not print.

    24. Re:Eeeeek... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides Unix, PC, MAC what other OS's does Acrobat Reader run on?

    25. Re:Eeeeek... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like you don't have access to a Windows machine for printing? Give me a break.

    26. Re:Eeeeek... by jackb_guppy · · Score: 1

      Add to that this from his writings...

      "These are done with DOS-like commands. UNIX/LINUX is heavily DOS-command style oriented. If you want to get into computer security then you will have to live, eat, and breath DOS and UNIX."

      UNIX is DOS-Like?

      Try again: DOS is UNIX-Like.

      Question: Which came first the Chicken or the Egg?
      Answer: the egg.

    27. Re:Eeeeek... by eggsome · · Score: 1

      Be sure to change it to a readable set of fonts first...non-anti-aliased text in PDFs is just plain ugly.

      You can't choose weather or not text in a PDF file is anti-aliased when viewed - that is determined by the client reader.

      --
      If they made a movie of your life, would anybody buy a ticket?
    28. Re:Eeeeek... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't even need ghostscript in MacOSX (at least, in 10.3, not sure about earlier). Just open up a .ps file and it will convert it to PDF for you; you can then look at it and save it if you want. TextEdit can also open up MS Word documents, and then you can print it as a PDF.

    29. Re:Eeeeek... by amaffew · · Score: 1

      Very good point...I did it that way because the students first are more familiar with DOS than UNIX...it's kind of the same analogy from mathematics that most people do not understand algebra until they get through calculus...that is backwards too. Nice catch!

    30. Re:Eeeeek... by jackb_guppy · · Score: 1

      For me...
      Software made Algebra understandable.
      Physics made Calculus understandable.

      Reality makes Abstract understandable.

  3. The artical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    seams to be more about independent net publishing then about the manual cisco did not write.

    1. Re:The artical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Likely because it is easier to write about a book that got written than one that didn't. Where do you start with talking about a book that doesn't exist?

  4. Still Wondering by swordboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm still wondering why the governments don't require free and "open source" text for public schools. In college, the professors used to change the text every semester so that the students couldn't sell the books back at the end of the semester (likely getting kick-backs from the text manufacturers, no doubt).

    If just one state would sit down and even purchase some good works and make them freely available for modification and distribution, then the cost of education would be greatly reduced. Profs would be free to make changes at it fits their style so long as those changes are re-posted to the public. Students could read the texts online and/or print them.

    What am I not seeing here?

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    1. Re:Still Wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Vested interests

    2. Re:Still Wondering by rpbailey1642 · · Score: 5, Informative

      You're exactly right about getting kick-backs, as well as the fact that they collect royalties for every book they put out. My Biology teacher is friends with the author of my Biology book (this is the reason that we use it, actually) and he has stated that to stay current with the class, you need the new book. Unless, you're really cheap, in which case, you'll need to know that Chapter Five is now Chapter Seven, and other trifle changes like that. At $100 a pop, these guys are milking college students (and their delicious scholarships) for as much as they can.

    3. Re:Still Wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If just one state would sit down and even purchase some good works and make them freely available for modification and distribution, then the cost of education would be greatly reduced.

      Don't know about the cost saving thing, but wouldn't having a "freely modifiable" text book defeat the purpose of having standardized text books? If the bible thumpers in the midwest were free to remove objectionable references to Darwin and the PC nuts in the west were free to remove text that didn't match their PC creed, then it would seem like we'd have quite the mess. I understand that this sorta happens now since institutions and individual professors are allowed to choose their own texts, but it seems like the situation would get worse and not better if this were allowed?

    4. Re:Still Wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Step 1: Create an "open source" textbook.

      Step 2: ??

      Step 3: Profit??

    5. Re:Still Wondering by bje2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      i'm not sure that would work...you need to have some "standard" teaching material somewhere...if you let every individual professor/teacher alter their text book according to their spercifications, things could get out of control...think about the viewpoint an affrican high school teacher in mississippi might have while teaching about the civil war...or a staunch anti-war believer when teaching about vietnam...children's views of events would eventually become skewed...that's why it's good to have standardized text books...

      of course, this relates mostly to elementary school & high school...obviously once you get into college, many teachers don't even use text books to begin with...

      --

      "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
    6. Re:Still Wondering by bje2 · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Another reason they changed books (or atleast versions) at the college i went to was the kill the used book market...it you have to have the latest/greatest version of a book, or a new book altogether, the independent used book store can't complete with the Barnes & Nobles owned University book store...

      --

      "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
    7. Re:Still Wondering by bje2 · · Score: 1

      obviously i meant "african-american" high school teacher...not "african"...

      --

      "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
    8. Re:Still Wondering by jefe7777 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      once Harcourt, Editis, John Wiley and McGraw-Hill pack it up because you've killed off their ability to make a profit, i hope you have a talented army of volunteers ready to crank out some material.

    9. Re:Still Wondering by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      I ran across this site some time ago while looking for EFL materials to contribute to, but it appears to have been in limbo for about two years, and no progress has been made. Perhaps this is the result of lobbying by the major textbook manufacturers? Nah.

    10. Re:Still Wondering by div_2n · · Score: 1

      Which is why when I was in school, I found people in my major and we shared books. Did homework together which inevitably cut down on the time it took. "You do number 1 and I'll do number 6." It was like distributed learning. Figure it out and then explain it to each other. This wouldn't always work, but it often did.

    11. Re:Still Wondering by teslatug · · Score: 1

      Kick backs??? No need for that, at my school some of the professors wrote the textbooks they required us to buy. One chem prof would change the book slightly each year just to make more moola.

    12. Re:Still Wondering by Omega+Leader-(P12) · · Score: 3, Informative

      As the son of a university professor I know my dad and his professor friends have gotten tons of books from publishers free.

      They simply see a book they like, call up the publisher and identify who they are who they work for and they have a class of 300+ stupid first year students next semester/year and the reading material is not set for this course yet.

      They then drop the names of a book from a competitor and say they have recently read that. By noon the next day there is a fed ex. package with a letter listing all the benefits of this book over the competitors plus illustrating the "deal" they have with the university and what the price for the students would be and how their price would be much lower than the competitor.

      Often there are additional books related to the topic "they feel would make excellent supplementary material". I have most of these books cause they get shuffled around.

      And if they know a professor is using the 2nd edition of a text and the third is coming out. A copy of the third will arrive free for "review", again with a list of advantages over the old edition.

      Somewhere they must have a list of professors and what they teach. They also know who teaches first-year classes cause they get the best review books.

      It makes sense, one free book to convince a professor to force 300-700 students who have to buy your book. That's a good return on investment. Unethical, no not really, and lucrative in all the cool free books that they send out.

    13. Re:Still Wondering by CGP314 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just as a plug, free textbooks can be found over at Wikibooks

    14. Re:Still Wondering by bandrzej · · Score: 1
      Only good if you are the professor or a friend and relative. Meanwhile, you are still ripping off the 300-700 students the "freebie" dished out by "Mr Big Book Producer"

      Unfortuantely, that is how the cookie crumbles. Reason why i wait till 3 weeks into the course to see if i REALLY need that text book. 8 times out of 10 you don't.

      --

      LainTheWired = isgod( int Lain, int denial, float truth)

    15. Re:Still Wondering by jrockway · · Score: 1

      Yes. Dr. Zumdahl at UIUC does this. Now his wife is a co-author so the book is almost twice as expensive. All for a subject that hasn't changed since 1950*. /me hopes he doesn't have to use that god-forsaken book at UIC...

      * Yeah, yeah. Some things have changed. But not $200 worth of things :)

      --
      My other car is first.
    16. Re:Still Wondering by joedobsonjr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "...you need to have some "standard" teaching material..."

      Standard teaching material doesn't lead to a correction of skewed viewpoints. It just makes sure we only have ONE skewed viewpoint.
      ---------------

    17. Re:Still Wondering by bandrzej · · Score: 1
      I can agree things can get out of control if every individual professor/teacher alter their text book to their specification, but they are already doing that by TEACHING.

      Hell, even the text books are skewed by the publisher and the author's personal viewpoint on the subject. Since you are hitting history, try comparing the American Revolutionary War from the US and British textbooks. Very different ways of telling the events.

      --

      LainTheWired = isgod( int Lain, int denial, float truth)

    18. Re:Still Wondering by Casca · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      So its better to learn about the civil war from the perspective of the white upper class, or of the vietnam war from the right wing conservative theocracy. Right? Children's views of events are skewed, you think the history that is taught in existing test books is what really happened? The right to pen history has been a spoil of the victor for ages, and nothing about that has changed.

      --
      Casca
    19. Re:Still Wondering by isorox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The fact profs write their own textbooks and get you to buy them?

    20. Re:Still Wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't look like a standardized English text did you a lot of good.

      i'm not sure that would work...you need to have some "standard" teaching material somewhere.

      How would the books being Free prevent that?

      think about the viewpoint an affrican high school teacher in mississippi might have while teaching about the civil war...or a staunch anti-war believer when teaching about vietnam...children's views of events would eventually become skewed

      And this would be different from the current situation exactly how? It's not like text book writers/publishers are less biased than other humans. Also there is nothing about the books being Free that suddenly stop school boards and parrents from deciding what curriculum and which teachers would be used to teach their children.

    21. Re:Still Wondering by dave_mcmillen · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm still wondering why the governments don't require free and "open source" text for public schools. In college, the professors used to change the text every semester so that the students couldn't sell the books back at the end of the semester (likely getting kick-backs from the text manufacturers, no doubt).

      And later that same thread . . .

      You're exactly right about getting kick-backs . . .

      Oh, yeah! I'm a professor, and you should see the stuff we get from the textbook people: hot and cold running Porsches, massages from scantily-clad young women (or men, if you prefer), big envelopes stuffed with cash . . .

      No, wait, that was all a dream. I must be teaching at the wrong place, because the very most I've ever gotten is the occasional free book and an even more occasional phone call asking if I've considered using book X.

      But you're right that textbooks are hideoulsy overpriced, and it's maddening that the publishers keep changing editions in an effort to force students to buy new rather than used. But it's an awfully big brush you're painting with, when you say that we're all getting kickbacks -- and you're getting paint all over me!

    22. Re:Still Wondering by amaffew · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because the schools are having to rely more and more on self-sustinance. They have to become in reality "for-profit" agencies. The only trouble is they are forgetting about the best interests of the students. I did this as a wake up call, pure and simple...besides, I agree, it should be free to students. The really good teacher/administrators should be able to find grants to pay for equipment. Plus, if they design their curriculum correctly they won't need much of it...my entry-level computer security program has been very well received and received some complaints also...eh, long live open source!

    23. Re:Still Wondering by Suidae · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Figure it out and then explain it to each other.

      I and my classmates did the same thing. We found that it took about the same amount of time (or longer depending on how much beer was involved) but we learned the material better, since we had to know it well enough to explain it clearly.

    24. Re:Still Wondering by sphealey · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Oh, yeah! I'm a professor, and you should see the stuff we get from the textbook people: hot and cold running Porsches, massages from scantily-clad young women (or men, if you prefer), big envelopes stuffed with cash . . .
      Not very much money in collge publishing compared to elementary school and high school. Richard Feinman recorded in great detail how, as a member of the California state textbook review panel (at least at that time, all textbooks used in California public schools needed the approval of that panel) he was offered all those things and more by textbook publishers. That was in the 70s, but from what I hear (and read in my children's textbooks) it isn't much different today.

      sPh

    25. Re:Still Wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still wondering why the governments don't require free and "open source" text for public schools ... What am I not seeing here?
      Simple, you live in a Capitalist country not a Socialist one. Everything is a $$ making opportunity. The culture here is not to show someone how to do something but rather sell the knowledge or a service to them.

    26. Re:Still Wondering by pete-classic · · Score: 3, Informative
      What am I not seeing here?


      Oh! Oh! I know! That the government isn't the answer to all problems?

      But that's just the Libertarian in me talking.

      In all seriousness, if you really think that this is a good idea consider pitching in to make it happen. I have my own project to this end, the Free Curriculum Project.

      I also help out a bit with another, Free High School Science Texts.

      I know that both or either project would sincerely appreciate your help.

      Both are focused on High School texts. Mine is biased to the United States of America, the other is South African.

      -Peter
    27. Re:Still Wondering by enjo13 · · Score: 2, Informative

      IANAUPBMWI (I am not a university professor but my wife is), but I would REALLY like to know how you get signed up for these kickbacks. After 4 years of PhD school it would sure be nice to get a little something extra back from that investment.

      It is true that she receives more textbooks every year than she can possibly read/investigate, at least for her changing a text book is more a very deliberate process. She's an Accounting professor, and she does change text books quite often. However, instead of some really great kick back scheme, she makes those changes because the standards of practices of the accounting profession are in near constant change. Outside of the basic principles classes, a text book only a couple of years old contains out of date and often misleading information.

      --
      Turn s60 photos into awesome videos with mScrapbook for all S60 3rd edition phones!
    28. Re:Still Wondering by mwood · · Score: 1

      This cuts both ways. I took one class in which the text was so new it wasn't published yet; the prof. handed out photocopies of a work-in-progress.

    29. Re:Still Wondering by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Semi OT, and I agree that most text books are priced far and above what they are "worth", but have you ever seen what an adjunct instructor gets paid?

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    30. Re:Still Wondering by scp_1 · · Score: 1

      Yes clearly the current system of releasing new versions of a text for $100 every year prevents this kind of nonsense.

      Thankfully using your tax dollars to purchase the latest edition every year will no doubt ensure the highests level of "standard" facts are presented to students.
      Of course the "Text and Academic Authors Association" insists these prices are the studnets faut and would go away if we would just stop reselling complimentary textbooks.

    31. Re:Still Wondering by bje2 · · Score: 1

      it has nothing to do with the text books being free, but everything to do with the text books being open source, so that professors can change them dynamically like the parent (to my post) suggested...

      --

      "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
    32. Re:Still Wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is nothing new, we've all encountered it. Ethics, morals, and honor are not to be assumed just because someone has been "educated" (although they are the first to try to convince you of that :-)

    33. Re:Still Wondering by raodin · · Score: 1

      I've been suprised how good my school is about textbooks - I've been able to purchase used books every quarter I've been here, and this quarter I actually didn't have to purchase any books because I'm taking courses which use books I already owned from previous courses.

    34. Re:Still Wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why I Capitalized the word Free. Free as in freedom to copy the books, make changes and distribute those changes etc.

    35. Re:Still Wondering by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      I and my classmates did the same thing.

      I'm guess you weren't an English major? :)

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    36. Re:Still Wondering by hkb · · Score: 1

      I'm still wondering why the governments don't require free and "open source" text for public schools.

      Probably because public education is bad enough already.

      --
      /* Moderating all non-anonymous trolls up since 2004 */
    37. Re:Still Wondering by masdog · · Score: 1

      Tried that once in my first database class, and the teacher called the four of us in and accused us of cheating because we all had similar papers.

    38. Re:Still Wondering by Raindeer · · Score: 1

      Well, you might not be gaining from this as a professor. But then you're not doing it right. You should do like so many professors and write your own book and then require all your students to use it in their classes. You will get money from that and judging from what I see here in the Netherlands, the fee is quite nicely rewarding. Though there are professors who take in mind the situation of their students and either publish without wanting a fee, there are others who put one or more of their books on list of nescessary books while only using one chapter of the entire book.

    39. Re:Still Wondering by MalikChen · · Score: 1

      think about the viewpoint an affrican high school teacher in mississippi might have while teaching about the civil war...or a staunch anti-war believer when teaching about vietnam...children's views of events would eventually become skewed...that's why it's good to have standardized text books...

      No, no it's not good to have standardized text books because it is difficult to choose a standard Besides, the point of K-12 is to get an education, to learn how to learn. Trivial things like knowing the capital of Tunzania aren't important in and of themselves, they are important because one day, you will have to be able to learn the cities where your customers are, or something like that.

      Also, it shouldn't matter what viewpoint the teacher has. I had a bible thumping, flag waving, white male republican for U.S. History in High School, but yet I formed the opinion that the Vietnam war was a conflict we shouldn't have gotten involved in.

      I, for one, do not believe in a standardized text book, or a standardized education. Sure, facts need to be standardized, but how those facts are presented should be left up to the teacher. Let the teacher teach, for crying out loud!

      of course, this relates mostly to elementary school & high school...obviously once you get into college, many teachers don't even use text books to begin with...

      You've obviously never had a prof who, come test day, gave his tests completely out of the book, with little to no questions that were only covered in his lecture. If the prof teaches out of them, books are important in college.

    40. Re:Still Wondering by sumo61 · · Score: 1

      I am a 1st year professor. What most of us are missing, and which is very crucial, is the 'system' on the academic side. Professors are required at most schools to get published...not only to gain tenure, but to keep their jobs. The committees which review us give NO CREDIT for self-publication because it is not 'peer-reviewed' (approved, reviewed, and accepted by other 'experts' in the field). The mainstream publishing houses provide this peer review via other professors (we get credit for reviews also). Publishers know all this and exploit not only the students, but the authors as well (all of my mentors tell me there is no money in text publishing for the author...but we have to do it anyway). So, since I have to create content for my classes anyway, and I have to get published to keep my job, why not meld all the class materials into a text and knock out 2 birds w/ one stone? Speaking for myself, I would love to leave behind the antiquated status-quo.

    41. Re:Still Wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We did this too in an Immigration class.

      It was neat having a cutting edge book, and the Professor went out of his way to arrange for us to get it (he didn't write it).

      However, it got some of us a little peeved as the books were $65, not all that cheaper than a regular text, while what we got was two books instead of one (presumably the copy paper was thicker), the books were bigger (8.5 x 11 with lots of whitespace), plastic bound, and had all sorts of handwritten notations.

    42. Re:Still Wondering by pierpa · · Score: 1

      In my old-fashion low-tech Italy, former minister of economy Tremonti has done for next year the law for downloadable school books.

      So Italy will save a lot of money because the state will not pay for books for poor families. And young girls and boys don't need to curve their thin shoulders under many heavy books.

      Obviously, press firms are arguing.

      I don't like generally Berlusconi's government, but i liked this move really a lot.

      Moreover, due to strange political moves, Tremonti was fired soon after his last law, containing smart ideas like this one.

      Actually the law doesn't talk about free (as in beer) books, but about books published in double format: paper and electronic. And the path is the right one.

      Anyway, these are references:

      http://www.ecodibergamo.it/EcoOnLine/NAZIONALI/2 00 4/07/02_libri.shtml

      http://www.orizzontescuola.it/modules.php?name=N ew s&file=article&sid=3249

      http://www.tgcom.it/politica/articoli/articolo20 88 64.shtml

      greetings,

      ppp

    43. Re:Still Wondering by ccady · · Score: 1

      >> I and my classmates did the same thing.

      > I'm guess you weren't an English major? :)

      <pedant>

      The first poster is grammatically correct. Separate the subjects: "I ... did the same," and "... my classmates did the same." Writing "Me and my classmates did the same," would be incorrect.

      I'll take the high road and assume that when you wrote "I'm guess ..." that you were either trolling or you made a typo.

      </pedant>

      --
      J'aime mieux les méchants que les imbéciles, parce qu'ils se reposent. -- Alexandre Dumas
    44. Re:Still Wondering by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      It was a bit of being silly in my own right. But I distinctly recall having it drilled into me that "I" comes last in a list of people, and so the correct version would be "My classmates and I did the same thing."

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    45. Re:Still Wondering by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      i'm not sure that would work...you need to have some "standard" teaching material somewhere...if you let every individual professor/teacher alter their text book according to their spercifications, things could get out of control...

      I don't understand. Are you saying that "open source" requires that professors be allowed to change content on the fly? There are kernel revisions. If you make version 1.0 of something (and it is open source), you can't prevent a user from changing it, but then they can't correctly call it "version 1.0".

      The same would apply with books. The state (or whatever body determines the books currently) could require that Open Source Biology Version 7.3.2 be used in all classrooms for school year 2004-2005. The professor could not change the content of the book he is required to use. He could make note of changes he would like to see and submit them for Version 7.3.3, but not change the content dynamically and still claim he was using the official textbook for the course.

      Obviously, the current (and proposed) system would allow him to not teach directly from the book, but the book presented would necessarily be the one approved by people other than the professor himself (unless the committee on textbooks was just one person and populated by the professor in question).

    46. Re:Still Wondering by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      And the prof is probably requiring a specific $100 book to get an entire 5% kickback. I guess it's fun being a tool of the publishing industry.

    47. Re:Still Wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The following might (cough) be illegal, and would be immoral if it was an honest author trying to make a decent living off the back of his/her book.

      *OTOH*, if they're trying to screw students like this you'll need:-

      * 1 (one) copy of book.
      * Fast scanner.
      * OCR (or at least conversion-to-PDF) software; probably came with the scanner.
      * CD writer.
      * (n-1) blank CDs, where n is the number of people in the class (and 1 is the number of copies of the book you have).
      * Enough sense not to get caught distributing the CDs (erm... if you're doing something dodgy with them, that is; I'm *not* endorsing this..)

      I think I've said enough already.

    48. Re:Still Wondering by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      You're exactly right about getting kick-backs, as well as the fact that they collect royalties for every book they put out. My Biology teacher is friends with the author of my Biology book (this is the reason that we use it, actually) and he has stated that to stay current with the class, you need the new book.

      Not every professor is like that though.

      I actually had one professor who personally refunded the royalty portion of the price of a new book. It was amazing. Anyone who bought a new book, he handed $5. He didn't like making money off book sales to his students.

      He's a very nice guy.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    49. Re:Still Wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he probably is not, dumbass.

    50. Re:Still Wondering by Threni · · Score: 1

      Oh, yeah! I'm a professor, and you should see the stuff we get from the textbook people: hot and cold running Porsches, massages from scantily-clad young women (or men, if you prefer), big envelopes stuffed with cash . . .

      That's like saying "I'm in a rock group and I don't take drugs".

      But you're right that textbooks are hideoulsy overpriced, and it's maddening that the publishers keep changing editions in an effort to force students to buy new rather than used.


      So why not have the university buy enough books for the next 5 years or so. You'd get them in bulk - and therefore cheaper - and you'd be saving the students money. And pissing off the publishers (as they'll sell less newer, more expensive books). And you'd know what was in the books, rather than having to keep changing your lecture notes etc.

    51. Re:Still Wondering by Threni · · Score: 1

      > "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even
      > remotely true." - Homer Simpson

      I prefer:

      "Facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan.

      Though there's a new challenger for the holder of the `Least Literate President` award in George W. Bush:

      "More Muslims have died at the hands of killers than--I say more Muslims--a lot of Muslims have died--I don't know the exact count--at Istanbul. Look at these different places around the world where there's been tremendous death and destruction because killers kill".

      Wise words indeed.

  5. as html by dncsky1530 · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's quite strange that it is not a PDF file.
    but is anyone wants the 5 meg html version it here

    1. Re:as html by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      If you use the other link provided in this article then you can download the latest version as a pdf... duh...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    2. Re:as html by spacefight · · Score: 1

      Above link returns an empty google cache page for me.

    3. Re:as html by fallenangel99 · · Score: 1

      register at lulu.com, add his book to your cart, download the pdf at 200+ KB/sec no /.'ng!!

  6. curriculum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    How much of the curriculum is specific to Cisco? And if it is specific to Cisco, then isn't that sort of limiting? I'm sure you'll get a thorough grounding in TCP/IP as well, but hell, you can get that from Richard Stevens TCP/IP Illustrated Vol 1.

    I've known several people who have been convinced that getting these Cisco certs will lead to untold riches - they have all been disappointed. It's definitely no substitute for a 4 year degree.

    1. Re:curriculum by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      A CCNA will go a long way toward getting your foot in the door at a lot of places. The CCNA often is today what MCSE and CNE were yesterday.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
  7. Re:Eeeeek... -- Looks good in OpenOffice 1.1.2 by invisik · · Score: 4, Informative

    Seemed to open fine (After a while!) in OpenOffice Writer 1.1.2. Haven't opened in actual Word to compare formatting, but looks reasonable to me. No complaints here.

    -m

    --
    http://www.invisik.com
  8. Near monopolies considered harmful by tommasz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Cisco has so much of the networking infrastructure market they obviously didn't care about the quality of their documentation. Luckily, there has always been a market for outsiders who can figure things out and explain them to others. Cisco would be smart to work with this guy.

    1. Re:Near monopolies considered harmful by sporty · · Score: 2, Informative

      If i remember correctly, Juniper is supposed to have a substancial share of the market. Something in the realm of a quarter.

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    2. Re:Near monopolies considered harmful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I've often suspected that some companies make the technical knowledge to use their products inaccessible to build up a loyal and fanatical following of technical professionals who know the real tricks.

      A certain popular DB company comes to mind. If anyone could set one up, more people would see that simpler solutions (mySQL, SQLite, etc.) would fit the bill 90% of the time, but as it is DBA functions are typically controlled in a company by a cabal that is heavily invested in their hard-won knowledge of a certain tool and they can be counted on to deprecate alternate solutions.

      Similarly, for a lot of networking functions, certainly not all, but a lot, a Linux or BSD box with standard software would fit the bill, but the networking group in most organizations has a one-solution mindset.

    3. Re:Near monopolies considered harmful by silas_moeckel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Juniper has a big market share at the mid high end as thats where they fit, your not seeing junipers replaces 26xx gear as they dont have the convergent techs to do so (IP, Voice, Dial IN/OUT, Fax, intergrated switches, IDS etc etc etc) I think by dollar ammount for core routing juniper is doing realy well but it's not trickling down into the 2-5k a pop branch office router/switch/pbx/blender that everybody seems to be installing.

      BTW I thin the cisco press books are actualy quite good on a lot of subjects, they dont baby you and the get the point accross. They dont put out cisco for dummies.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
  9. This is about certifications by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They probably figured, "we can charge a ton for our cert's forever, because no one is going to take the time to write a book." OOPS! I hope other people follow suit and finally we will be rid of the "if you're not certified, you can't have learned it" business principle.

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:This is about certifications by Beatbyte · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "if you're not certified, you can't have learned it" business principle.

      maybe you should partake in an open source grammar book :-P

    2. Re:This is about certifications by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I hope other people follow suit and finally we will be rid of the "if you're not certified, you can't have learned it" business principle.

      How about the, "If you've learned it, you should be able to demonstrate it in a simple, quick, and inexpensive test," business principal. Most places I have worked even pay for the passed tests - MCP MCSE CCSA CCSP CCNA CCDA CCDP A+ N+ S+ and some others I'm forgetting. It isn't hard. And only for one of those did I take a class. Most of them were independent learning, followed by the simple and quick test. Yes, I've spent somewhere around $2000 in tests alone, but isn't your career worth it? Mine is.

  10. finally by falkryn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    good to see somebody doing this. I took the first semester Cisco course at my college, and yeah, the books weren't all that good. I haven't seen his work yet, but I do recall the first semester is exclusively going over the seven layers of the OSI model in sometimes painful detail. Can tend to throw the beginning student off, especially considering the OSI model is not much more than an academic tool anyway, TCP/IP is were its at in the 'real world'.

    1. Re:finally by Jacer · · Score: 2, Informative

      The OSI model is used to describe the function of a network. TCP/IP can be mapped exactly to the OSI model as a four layer stack. So, academic tool or not, it's a standarized way to teach, that helps you branch off into TCP/IP, Netware, any other protocol.

      --
      --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
    2. Re:finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "The OSI model is used to describe the function of a network. TCP/IP can be mapped exactly to the OSI model as a four layer stack."

      The presentation and session layers are lumped into TCP/IP's application layer where they belong. How then, does teaching the OSI model, where these two layers are explicit, help in the student's understanding of network protocols? What useful purpose does teaching the concepts of presentation and sessions have when they are almost orthoganol to the topic at hand? (I'm struggling to come up with examples of applications where the concepts of these two layers are so important that they need to be distinct from the application protocol itself.)

      Using layered protocols to teach networking is good, but the OSI model is a classic example of design by committee and is more confusing than helpful; at least when compared to the TCP/IP model.

    3. Re:finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The OSI model is great for planning bus routes and time tables, and nothing else.

    4. Re:finally by illumin8 · · Score: 4, Informative
      Can tend to throw the beginning student off, especially considering the OSI model is not much more than an academic tool anyway, TCP/IP is were its at in the 'real world'.

      It's good to know how the OSI model works, especially when troubleshooting tricky layer 2, 3, and 4 network issues. That being said, when I took the CCNA test they only had about 2 questions on it. They were something like "Which of the following are layers in the OSI model" or something really basic like that. Anyway, my instructor had a really good way to remember the OSI model that I still remember to this day (took the class in 1997):

      All People Seem To Need Data Processing.

      The letters in this saying correspond very nicely with the layers in the OSI model:

      Application

      Presentation

      Session

      Transport

      Network

      Data Link

      Physical

      Hope this helps those of you studying for your CCNAs (judging by enrollment numbers in these college courses, there's a lot of you.)

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    5. Re:finally by Nameles · · Score: 1

      Here's one that's backwards that I saw on /. a while ago

      Pew! Dead Ninja Turtles Smel Particularly Awful!

    6. Re:finally by falkryn · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we used that acronym for the OSI layer names too. Actually I graduated about a year ago, and never went further with the CCNA stuff beyond the first course. It was required for all of us, I went on afterwards to the MS Win2k track instead. Then, graduated, doing... Linux tech support for a major Unix company. Weird eh? (but I'm thankful to God for it)

      That said, I would be interested in eventually learning more of it on my own now, the Cisco stuff. At the time, it seemed to me the whole academy/college connection with cisco seemed rather dubious. I mean really, how many CCNAs does the world really need? (I'm referring to people who know Cisco, but ONLY know Cisco, and nothing else. Knowing it in accompaniment with other skills is a good thing).

    7. Re:finally by boneshintai · · Score: 1

      Please Do Not Throw Sausage Pizza Away. What can I say? Our class was made of hungry geeks.

    8. Re:finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you really need to pay attention more.

      All layers are used in the real world, without them there would be no TCP/IP. That and not to mention TCP and IP only represent 2 of the 7 layers, things can and do go wrong at other layers and beleive me, you will need to know layer 2 stuff when you are troubleshooting and I'm only a system admin.

      I agree a whole semister on it could be overkill.

    9. Re:finally by basso · · Score: 1

      That's the one I use when I teach the OSI model. I think it's best to teach the concepts from the wire up rather than the reverse.

    10. Re:finally by slappy_guru · · Score: 1

      For engineers !!! from the bottom of the stack...

      Please
      Do
      Not
      Tell
      Sales
      People
      Anything

      --
      "Science is like sex: sometimes something useful comes out, but that is not the reason we are doing it" Richard Feynman
    11. Re:finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All People Should Take Narcotic Drug Pills

      thats how my prof taught us to remember it.

    12. Re:finally by Percy_Blakeney · · Score: 1
      The OSI model is used to describe the function of a network.

      Kind of, but not really. It wasn't meant to describe the function of a network, in the general sense, but the function of a specific network -- SNA, which was IBM's networking architecture at the time.

      Go read about the OSI model and protocols in Andrew Tanenbaum's Computer Networks; he describes the political motivations behind OSI and why it isn't the sacred cow that a lot of network administrators think it is. He actually uses a hybrid model consisting of 5 layers to teach networking, because the OSI model is flawed, as is the TCP/IP architecture design. (One small caveat here: I have the 3rd edition, while the 4th edition is what is current.)

      Of course, everyone loves to use the "OSI model" buzzword, so we'll never see it put to bed like it should be.

  11. Great pricing scheme by Mark_Uplanguage · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've seen some of the initial comments here and if you notice that the price of the book is $25 for the printed version, of which Mr. Basham get's $5 (20%) and the publisher gets the rest. Honestly I don't have the time to figure out what LuLu.com's expenses might be (since I have no idea the cost of bandwidth to download 5MB), but this seems like a VERY valid business model for homegrown authors to go to. Good luck to LuLu.com and my they break open the gates of good reading at reasonable costs!!!

    --
    "The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits." -- Albert Einstein
    1. Re:Great pricing scheme by salutor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Lulu.com business model is based on a 20% commission on sales. Exact production costs vary depending on the number of pages and delivery format (electronic versions obviously have no production cost), but in all cases authors set their own royalty: they receive that royalty amount for every sale regardless of the production cost or Lulu commission.

      The cost of a printed book to a customer who buys it is:
      $4.53, the base cost for a perfect-bound printed book, + (# of pages x $.02 per page) + author royalty + Lulu commission

      For downloads, the cost is simply the author royalty + Lulu commission. If the author royalty is $4, the Lulu commission would be $1, and the cost to the customer for the book would be $5.

      By the way, Basham's Lulu.com storefront is here: www.lulu.com/learningbydoing

      --
      http://MarketingType.com
  12. Useful Contribution by XeRXeS-TCN · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think that this is a very useful contribution to anyone who is looking for information on Cisco networking. It's definately a "middle finger" to big companies who are so set in their ways, they are unwilling to take advice from people in the field who have the qualifications and experience to make a genuine contribution to their documentation.

    In many ways, it also reflects the spirit of the Free Software movement, in many respects. It reflects the frustration of a constant refusal to fix issues with something released in what is, in certain respects, a proprietary format, and the result of writing a version, which is then distributed for free. It's good to see :)

    Speaking of which, I wonder if Mr Basham could be convinced to release the text under a free license, like the GNU FDL... possibly not, if he has already made arrangements with publishers, but it might be worth looking into...

  13. What??? by morgdx · · Score: 4, Funny

    Networks need manuals? I thought you just had to make sure no-one knocked the patch cables out.

    --
    http://jfin.org/jFin pure java open source financial library
    1. Re:What??? by w1r3sp33d · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's not hard fixing a disconnected cable, I am sure the majority of the book is probably a guide to hunting and finding lost token's (best hiding spots, migratory patterns, reactions of cornered tokens, ect)

    2. Re:What??? by C-Style · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. There's also several chapters devoted to Ethernet managment - what to do if the Ether leaks out of the cables, how to refill the cables, etc. There's also recommendations for department stores if you need to replace the frame in your Frame Relay.

    3. Re:What??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget about how to explain to others why their network connection is slow.

      You - "Well, you know the data is made up of 1's and 0's."
      User - "Yeah."
      You - "Sometimes the 1's get a little caught, so you need to just jiggle the cable to knock it loose."

      Still can't believe they fell for it.

    4. Re:What??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hunting tokens? Any good network admin has learned how to tame them, and raises their own on a ranch on their desk. At least, that's where they claim the smell comes from...

    5. Re:What??? by silvwolf · · Score: 1

      hunting and finding lost token's (best hiding spots, migratory patterns, reactions of cornered tokens, ect)

      When I was doing tech support at my school last fall, I ran across a computer that had a token ring card. Some old Compaq I think it was, probably a regular Pentium. Who knows when the school's network last used token ring, if it ever did.

      I told the owner that "her internet" wasn't working because it wasn't her turn to use it. She gave me a sorta-confused look, and I told her it'd be a while...

  14. Bad Self Publishing by RoscoeChicken · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Self-published textbooks will only work when some sort of feedback mechanism is in place to offer an indication of the quality of the book.


    For years, at the University of South Florida in Tampa, the engineering college subjected undergraduates to an extremely poor thermodynamics text self-published by an influential department chair until the thermo scores started to slide on the state EIT exams.

    1. Re:Bad Self Publishing by salutor · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I would challenge the notion that there is a distinct category of books that are self-published. To some extent the categories of publisher and self-publisher are anachronistic.

      I've made the argument that there is no such thing as self-publishing in more detail elsewhere, but to summarize:

      • Many independent publishers publish the work of a small number of writers.
      • Many writers establish "publishing companies" to distribute their own work.
      • And at this point, technologies like Lulu.com make publishing accessible to anyone and everyone.

      The real difference, insomuch as there is a difference, is in the branding. O'Reilly, for example, has a brand that information seekers trust. So an O'Reilly book by an author you've never heard of is probably more appealing than a Lulu.com book by an author you've never heard of. But what if an author develops his own brand?

      Along those lines, last week I found myself in the middle of a back-and-forth with a prominent tech journalist. His position was in essence that most of what is written is crap and that the editorial control exercised by publishers is essential. Fair enough. Most of what's written is crap, (although that doesn't seem to stop people from buying it when it's put out by major publishers).

      But the dilemma you allude to, as I see it, is comparable to the dilemma presented by the emergence of the World Wide Web itself. "If anyone can put up anything on the Web," railed skeptics, "the whole thing is going to be useless. If you can't find the worthwhile information in the mountains of rotten information, what good will it be?"

      Venerable institutions like the New York Times (justifiably) shuddered that individual sites--Matt Drudge's, for example--could compete with their own as sources for information. And yet, it has come to be. The Internet provides the means by which authors can develop their own brands. Matt Basham (the CISCO prof), for example, is in the process of developing his.

      --
      http://MarketingType.com
  15. Cisco books... by !ramirez · · Score: 4, Informative

    Cisco Press books are, without a duobt, the best technical manuals (from a manufacturer) that I have yet read. Anyone who simply bashes on the 'networking academy' crap is doing a serious disservice to the legions of people who have progressed far beyond that simple standard of networking knowledge.

    I imagine that a large number of people who have never read Jeff Doyle's "Routing TCP/IP" Vols. I & II, or Kennedy Clark's "Cisco LAN Switching" will comment about this article - read any dense technical manual by either of the above, or Bassam Halabi, or Priscilla Oppenheimer, or any non-entry level book, and see what I mean.

    Besides, all of the entry-level Cisco knowledge focuses on the OSI model and BASIC network troubleshooting. If you REALLY wanted to learn that and not be led by the hand thru a technical school, you would read "TCP/IP Illustrated" by W. Richard Stevens.

    1. Re:Cisco books... by w1r3sp33d · · Score: 4, Funny

      I can't agree more, Doyle's TCP/IP I&II are two of the best books I have ever read. Don't mod me funny, I am not kidding.

    2. Re:Cisco books... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You should try IBM books. They are FREE!

      The TCP/IP overview is one of the best book of the subject.

      www.redbooks.ibm.com

    3. Re:Cisco books... by illumin8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Cisco Press books are, without a duobt, the best technical manuals (from a manufacturer) that I have yet read.

      I agree wholeheartedly. Especially Basam Hallabi's Internet Routing Architectures. (No affiliate link) This book taught me how to establish BGP routing policies, and is considered fundamental reading by almost anyone on NANOG.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    4. Re:Cisco books... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The IRA second edition by Sam Halibi has long been considered the bible of BGP. Mine is beaten-up, dog-eared, and is full of highlighting, notes in margins, and food stains and phone numbers.

      Like them or not, Cisco Press makes fine books for working engineers. Some better than others, sure.

      An introductory book is one thing, lets see the prof take on a subject of challenge like MPLS or class-based queueing from the ground up.

    5. Re:Cisco books... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      If you REALLY wanted to learn that and not be led by the hand thru a technical school, you would read "TCP/IP Illustrated" by W. Richard Stevens.

      Or "Interconnections" by Perlman or "Networking with TCP/IP" by Comer. "TCP/IP Clearly Explained" by Loshin wasn't bad for the pure IP stuff, but it was weak on stuff the new people need about the physical layer.

      But yes, the Cisco Press books are some of the best books ever written on networking. I have a library that I've spent about $2000 on just on Cisco Press books. I have read many of them cover to cover, and the rest are used for reference. It is a great investment to buy the appropriate book when you need to know something it contains. You learn more of the why and how and some related things that save you time and effort in the future.

    6. Re:Cisco books... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Score:5, Funny)

      Don't mod me funny, I am not kidding.


      Oh my GOD, the inmates are running the asylum here at Slashdot.

      Don't mod me insightful.

      Shit, if I do get modded insightful, then this comment will be funny. Aaargh, my BRAIN!

  16. What about other textbooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The textbook publishers really are running a racket. For example, why do they publish a new edition of a calculus textbook every year? Calculus has changed very little since the time of Newton. So even a 50 year old text is not going to be hardly any different from a 1 year old text.

    A freshman calculus text is something that could easily be put on-line and into pdf format. The reason this isn't done is because the universities themselves are in collusion with the textbook publishers. The universities and professors receive kickbacks for pushing the latest overpriced dross. The racketeering term for this practice is payola.

    Paging Bob Young. Are you listening?

    1. Re:What about other textbooks by salutor · · Score: 2, Informative

      To some extent I can speak for Bob Young on this subject--the pricing situation with textbooks was very much the impetus for him to start Lulu.com. We are all in agreement on the problem.

      Two points worth noting, however: when we (Lulu.com) talk to professors about textbook publishing, they broadly express the same concerns that you and others do about the books having become too expensive. Our experience is that professors are so interested in making cheaper books available to students that they are more likely to want to give away their IP than to sell it. From a Lulu perspective, we support their right to give it away, but if we are going to survive as a business we also hope that some authors of valuable content will charge something for their work.

      The other thing I would point out is that it's actually the college bookstores that prevent the textbook publishers from offering downloads of textbooks. Believe it or not, they're acting the villain in this saga to some extent by pressuring the publishers not to disintermediate sales (I think that's the right word--but you get the idea).


      --
      http://MarketingType.com
    2. Re:What about other textbooks by slashjames · · Score: 1
      it's actually the college bookstores that prevent the textbook publishers from offering downloads
      I'm the network admin for a college bookstore and I can say that's bluntly not the case. When we buy textbooks from the publisher, they're priced close to what we sell them at. For example, if you buy a book for $100, we probably bought it for $85-90. That gives us a gross profit of 10-15%, which is rather low compared to other items we sell. A t-shirt has a gross profit of > 100%, for example.

      In short, it's the publishers that keeps prices high and pushes new versions all the time. When is the last time the Latin language changed?
    3. Re:What about other textbooks by salutor · · Score: 1
      Don't misunderstand me--I agree that the publishers are the root of the problem. Your example of the Latin textbook is perfect. But it's also important to understand the costs that go into books in order to make a coherent argument. My point is that there is at least one trade organization of college bookstores that lobbies against publishers selling books directly to students. It's perfectly reasonable that they would do so--that's the role of trade organizations--but removing one of the middlemen would also remove one element of the cost.

      The price difference that a bookstore takes is also greater than you suggest. We deal with many, many bookstores --college and otherwise--every day. The typical bookstore requests a significant discount on books when ordering from a supplier like us. When there is a third intermediary (distributor), the distributor and the bookstore generally have to try to split a 50-55% discount among themselves. The other 45-50% of the 'jacket' price of the book has to be split between the manufacturer, the publisher, and the author.

      To use one specific example, in the case of the most popular college textbook published through Lulu.com, the college bookstores buy the book directly from Lulu at a 38% discount from the cover price. Because Lulu.com doesn't accept returns (the limitation of print on demand technology), the bookstore also assumes the risk for any books that go unsold. The bookstore buys the books at $12.89 per book and sells them to students at $17.75 for a new copy. They also sell used copies.

      Again, please don't misunderstand. I'm not questioning the right of bookstores to make money--they make little enough of it as it is--just elucidating the elements of the costs so as to make for a more informed discussion.

      --
      http://MarketingType.com
    4. Re:What about other textbooks by at-a-glance · · Score: 1

      Have you seen this breakdown of the textbook dollar? http://www.nacs.org/common/research/textbook$.pdf

      No one imho is a villain in this scene.... Publishers, bookstores are not like Enron. It's capitalism. It's inflation. Yes there should be alternatives to getting information for free to further the original intent of the Gutenberg press! But, this raises more questions than answers them for me.

      There is no such thing as a free lunch, so what cost does this "self-publishing" have? What kind of accuracy and quality can lulu.com ensure? What does it actually cost the student/reader if this material is not accurate and they go to get certified and have been possibly mislead by one man's material? What does it cost the student (or their school lab resources) to print out this "free" book of 500 to 800 pages to gain the full benefit of a textbook ? (i.e. having the ability to read offline, highlight, etc. is still a tangible benefit of printed books) What real costs do ambitious people like Mr. Basham incur to get their material published--read the fine print on lulu.com services and/or just track what it takes in personal time & $$ to write, edit, review, format, proofread, and dissemninate this material)? What more does a commercial publisher provide than lulu.com? Is lulu.com truly a better alternative or just an alternative?

      Mr. Basham's book is meant to work with a curriculum that is already free and online through the Academy program. All instructors in this program are encouraged to provide each other with free material to share. Cisco has a website set up for this.

      Does anyone question the costs mentioned in the articles for the school tuition & fees (Ranging from $2k to $7k) for the same program?

      The Cisco texts he is "competing" with have an associated retail price, yes, but certainly not as much as a lot of textbooks are these days ("only" $67 for a companion guide, $22 for a lab manual, $30 for a workbook), and it must be noted they can be had for a discounted price off the publisher's site. (See ciscopress.com, register and get 25% off all ciscopress books). Is this disintermediating? or is it just another alternative?

    5. Re:What about other textbooks by salutor · · Score: 1

      I'll take a stab at a few of these questions.

      >>There is no such thing as a free lunch, so what cost does this "self-publishing" have?

      If we are talking about Lulu.com in particular, there are no specific costs involved on the publishing side, apart from the effort required to put together a publishable book (which is considerable). That said, an author would be well-advised to pay for editing, proofreading, typesetting, and cover art prior to publishing the book. But many authors manage to do all of this themselves, and to do a decent job (Basham, for example). If an author wants expanded distribution, he/she should also purchase ISBN assigment for $150, which will get the book listed on retail sites such as Amazon.com. Lulu.com's 20% commission comes from sales of the book, not from charging the author/publisher.

      >>What kind of accuracy and quality can lulu.com ensure?

      None.

      >>What does it actually cost the student/reader if this material is not accurate and they go to get certified and have been possibly mislead by one man's material?

      The marketplace is a pretty good judge when it comes to this kind of thing. A bad CISCO certification book is not likely to sell very well. In Basham's case, he actually gives away the electronic version for free, so it's pretty easy to evaluate. But there is always risk when you buy something. I'm told aphrodisiacs sell pretty well on the web, too.

      >>What does it cost the student (or their school lab resources) to print out this "free" book of 500 to 800 pages to gain the full benefit of a textbook ? (i.e. having the ability to read offline, highlight, etc. is still a tangible benefit of printed books)

      Of course, one of the nifty things about Lulu.com is that you can buy an actual printed book (bound and all), so you don't have to print it out yourself. I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest that any students who are printing out 800 page PDFs are probably doing so either at school or at work. So perhaps a better question would be, how much is it costing employers and institutions? The cost of a bound 800-page book through Lulu.com is likely to be upwards of $20, depending on what royalty the author has set on the book.

      >>What real costs do ambitious people like Mr. Basham incur to get their material published--read the fine print on lulu.com services and/or just track what it takes in personal time & $$ to write, edit, review, format, proofread, and dissemninate this material)?

      A better question for Matt Basham. I'm sure he spent an enormous amount of time putting together the book. He is paid by the school at which he teaches, however, and all the publicity he has garnered will be good for the school program.

      >>What more does a commercial publisher provide than lulu.com?

      Good question. Conventional publishers provide, in addition to a sophisticated distribution mechanism, marketing. And marketing is key. Publishing through Lulu.com means that an author/publisher must do his own marketing. But having pointed that out, I have yet to find a conventionally published author who was happy with the marketing his publishing company provided for his book. Marketing is expensive and frequently unsuccessful. Lulu.com as a publishing tool (and, in a larger sense, the web itself as a distribution tool) provides a means by which the marketplace can access a work and determine its worth on its own, in a democratic fashion, as opposed to being told what is valuable by marketers with deep pockets. Because publishing through Lulu.com doesn't require the big investment (risk) required by conventional publishing, then there is less pressure to succeed, which allows more books with smaller potential readerships to reach the marketplace. That's good for both authors and readers.

      >>Is l

      --
      http://MarketingType.com
  17. DMCA Anyone? by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Considering that the manual discloses methods of operating and controlling Cisco products, as well as the interfaces used by them, could Cisco sue under the DMCA for copyright theft of its instructions on how to use its equipment.

    If the instructions were generated by a computer algorithim then the answer to this is a resounding yes as then Cisco would have patented 'a method by which Cisco,(us), uses a PC to and printer to generate the instructions to operate our hardware', and could then sue the good doctor as presumably he used a PC and printer too.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
    1. Re:DMCA Anyone? by isorox · · Score: 1

      You can download the book. Major lack of printer needed there.

    2. Re:DMCA Anyone? by amaffew · · Score: 1

      No they couldn't...(at least I don't think so) the newest version of the DMCA has exclusions for educational institutions...even still those are my thoughts on the routers and how to do the instructions, not cisco's word for word instructios...If Cisco did do that they would effectively have to take on the whole publishing industry...which would not be wise for them to do...Besides...you sue people to get money and I don't have any...so what would be the point?

      I do things very differently (ie. make sense)...but you do raise a rather interesting question and actually it would be fun to see what happens if I get sued under the DMCA...I have a couple of friends at Harvard Law School that love to take those types of cases Pro-bono just to see them to their end. A very excellent point and who really knows who is right? There is right and wrong, and then there is legally sound and not legally sound. Thanks for the post! Matt

    3. Re:DMCA Anyone? by LoocSiMit · · Score: 1
      How did the parent get modded insightful? It's a blatant troll.

      1) Straw man. The DMCA doesn't cover disclosing "methods of operating and controlling" products unless those methods are for the purposes of circumventing copyright protection. These are not.

      2) Straw man. You can't patent "a method by which Cisco,(us), uses a PC to and printer to generate the instructions to operate our hardware". It's not novel or non-obvious, so it's not patentable. Even the USPTO could see that. Probably.

      --
      Intellectual Property
      Intellectual: of the mind
      Property: that over which one has control
  18. Certified by Bigbutt · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, it's for CCNA which is an ok beginning. Downloading now to see if it'll help with my CCNP recert.

    I got my CCNA simply to understand networking better and the environment at work. The company paid for a CCNP class so I felt I had to give it a shot and got my CCNP 5 months after the class ended. Now that I have to recert, I'm studying the Switch/Router books and, even though I didn't work as a network engineer, much of the material is familiar.

    Do you know what they call someone who received the lowest passing scores on the tests? "Cisco Certified" :-)

    --
    Shit better not happen!
  19. Those publishers really funny by gladmac · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How can they argue that they do not overprice their books [in the US] when you can pick the same book up in Europe, for much less. And what is really funny... it even says on them "Not for sale in the US" [because there we have this really good thing going on with the other publishers about not going below $0.2 per page EVER].

    1. Re:Those publishers really funny by !ramirez · · Score: 1

      Buy used Cisco Press books from eBay, Amazon, or Alibris.

      I regularly purchase books for under $20, slightly used. Don't let the cover price scare you.

    2. Re:Those publishers really funny by gladmac · · Score: 1

      That's a great solution... let's all get our books from eBay:) Won't really work that good though, will it...

    3. Re:Those publishers really funny by !ramirez · · Score: 1

      Yes, it will - I regularly purchase books from there, or used off of Amazon for up to 80% off of list. Go look for Cisco Press stuff on either eBay, Alibris, or Amazon - you'll be absolutely amazed.

    4. Re:Those publishers really funny by gladmac · · Score: 1

      I meant that it's not a solution to book prizes... since new books must come from somewhere. There is always a good deal of people that would have to buy the books for the high prize. You would notice this in that the cheap books on eBay and Amazon would run out. That said, it seems to be a sweet rebate for those who use it. Were more people to use it, the prizes even for used books would rise. There is a balance.

    5. Re:Those publishers really funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      prize->priCe ... you fucking moron.

  20. Mirror please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somebody with the copy please post a mirror. The download link is not responding

  21. Stop your bashing. by Karoshi · · Score: 1

    Offer him your help and write it in LaTex.

    --
    Don't answer me. Moderate. Slashdot is about moderation, not discussion.
    1. Re:Stop your bashing. by uss_valiant · · Score: 3, Informative
      Offer him your help and write it in LaTex.
      Currently only available in German, but IWM ProWord turns MS Word into a very professional and efficient text editor.
      It eliminates the drawbacks of MS Word (can handle easily large (>500 pages) documents, ...) and introduces features as true templating and a fast keyboard only menu.
  22. Save download times by landoltjp · · Score: 0

    Since ./'ers like to post copies of the articles (and the subsequent karma slurpage), could someone please post the Word file here as well?

    1. Re:Save download times by bhmit1 · · Score: 1

      could someone please post the Word file here as well

      It's over 500 pages, so not really postable to /., but I put it up on Shareaza's G2. Search for CCNA-manual.doc.

    2. Re:Save download times by julesh · · Score: 1

      There'll be 300 virus infested copies in half an hour. Post a magnet link, next time.

    3. Re:Save download times by bhmit1 · · Score: 1

      Post a magnet link, next time.

      Fair point. Though I never trust anything I download, and my sharing is done through a separate system. I can't use the magnet links myself, but I think this works:

      CCNA-manual.doc

  23. Wow... by GodHead · · Score: 4, Funny

    Offering a 5mb file on slashdot...

    That takes balls.

    --
    Just wait till some crappy band steals your nic.
    1. Re:Wow... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      No, on the contrary...

      Offering SOMEONE ELSE'S 5MB file on slashdot...

      Priceless.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:Wow... by Delphis · · Score: 1

      It was on a .edu, so there's plenty of bandwidth there :)

      --
      Delphis
  24. here it is in HTML form by ChrisCampbell47 · · Score: 4, Informative
    For those of you who refuse to download MS Word docs off the web (due to virus payload concerns), repeat after me: "Google is your friend"

    After clicking on a link below, click on "View as HTML" on the resulting page.

    Preface:
    http://www.google.com/search?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sp college.edu%2Fstar%2Fcisco%2FMatt%2Fpreface.doc

    Textbook:
    http://www.google.com/search?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sp college.edu%2Fstar%2Fcisco%2FMatt%2Ftextbook.doc *

    It's a gigantic HTML file and may give your browser fits, but at least it's not a MS Word doc file.

    [* looks like Google hasn't parsed that big doc into HTML yet, maybe they will soon now :) ]

    1. Re:here it is in HTML form by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or you can do something silly and simply open the horribly offensive DOC file in Open Office and not worry one tiny bit about any virus payload and convert it to your favorite format.

      open Office is your answer.... why are you not using it?

  25. get HTML here by ChrisCampbell47 · · Score: 1

    See my other post, and mod it up. I don't need the karma points, just trying to help out.

  26. Open Licence != Arbitrarily Selected by TheWormThatFlies · · Score: 1

    Whoa! I think you and another poster a little further down are confusing two completely different issues. The licence under which a textbook is released has nothing to do with which version of the textbook is set as a standard.

    If a textbook is released under a licence which allows it to be freely modified and redistributed, this means exactly that - it can legally be freely modified and redistributed. Any modified versions, however, will not be the textbook which was prescribed for the course.

    Just because Linux is open source doesn't mean that an institution can't require all its employees to use a standardised version of it.

    It's likely that respectable "upgrades" of the textbook would periodically be adopted as the new standard, but this would not happen automatically (in theory, there is no reason for it to happen automatically now, but - as other people have said - it is worth a lot of money to many people to ensure that it does).

    If the author didn't make supermegabucks off every pointless, trivial change, there would be no incentive for him to make pointless, trivial changes. And there would be no incentive for other people involved to push institutions into adopting the updated version when it isn't necessary.

    1. Re:Open Licence != Arbitrarily Selected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a textbook is released under a licence which allows it to be freely modified and redistributed, this means exactly that - it can legally be freely modified and redistributed. Any modified versions, however, will not be the textbook which was prescribed for the course.

      Actually no, it isn't a different issue. The point is, I as a professor might like TextbookA which is under this freely modifiable licensing structure. However, there are certain aspects that I don't like, so I choose to remove those offending pages, add a few of my own, and then make this new version the one required for my class. Now imagine entire school districts doing exactly this.

    2. Re:Open Licence != Arbitrarily Selected by nmos · · Score: 1

      You're right. The school board would probably have to get together every year or two and decide exactly which books and which versions would be approved for use. Teachers would still have some flexability to add some supplimental material but they'd probably get their hand slapped for adding anything too contraversial.

      Oh wait, that's how it already works.

  27. All it takes is time by Safety+Cap · · Score: 3, Interesting
    What I would try to do is check out the book from the college library and scan or photocopy the relevent chapters. Yes, illegal as hell, but when you're a starving college student, paying US$18 for 600 pages versus $100 for the physical Chem book (if you could sell it back, you'd get something like $30) is much more economical.

    If I recall correctly, not too long ago some folks had the bright idea of ordering their books from Canada/UK. Seems that the same exact textbooks there cost up to 50% less than in the states.

    --
    Yeah, right.
  28. Oracle Benchmark Perallel? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
    Could Deitel be sued for publishing books on Java and .Net?

    Does the license for using / touching / seeing / feeling a Cisco router contain language that prevents dissemination of this type of info? Doesn't Oracle have a license that says you can't release benchmark information?

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:Oracle Benchmark Perallel? by ckaminski · · Score: 2, Informative

      Benchmark information is not the same as functional descriptions. There are LOTS of 3rd party Oracle books available at bookstores.

      The benchmark restriction is because benchmarks are relative, and not necessarily indicative of performance. "SELECT * FROM table" is not relative. It does what it says.

    2. Re:Oracle Benchmark Perallel? by perlchild · · Score: 1

      That's different, when you get Oracle software, you get a Eula, and the Eula says you AGREE that it's illegal for you to do these things once you have the software.

      I doubt Deitel agreed he gave up the right to publish a book about Cisco that meets a needs he identified, pointed out to Cisco, and Cisco refused to meet.

    3. Re:Oracle Benchmark Perallel? by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      That's different, when you get Oracle software, you get a Eula, and the Eula says you AGREE that it's illegal for you to do these things once you have the software.

      Interesting Point....

      If I have never installed Oracle, and have simply been involved in helping many clients with unpublished benchmarks of Oracle, DB2, PostgreSQL, etc. then I would expect that I could publish the aggregate data because I have never agreed to such terms. As courts have generally not enforced EULAs which the defendent had not reasonably accepted, I think I should be pretty safe, but IANAL.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    4. Re:Oracle Benchmark Perallel? by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1
      Or you can publish from some country where Oracle lawyers have weaker position than in the US, and perhaps EU. I am pretty sure Oracle runs at exactly the same speed in Philippines or Indonesia as in the "developed" (read: overlawyered) countries.


      Alternatively, you can use the same approach local "banned" authors used to use to get published during the Communism; write the specs, and get somebody other to publish it under their name.

    5. Re:Oracle Benchmark Perallel? by perlchild · · Score: 1

      Well considering Oracle's wording is that if you don't agree, you can't use the software, it might be a bit harder than you think. That so little effort has been spent in getting courts to declare sharing your user experience illegal, now that's something surprising.
      As for different countries having different laws, I dunno about yours, but in mine, the aggregate data doesn't belong to you in the first place, since it was part of a contract, UNLESS the clients actually agreed the data belonged to you at the end of the benchmarks.

    6. Re:Oracle Benchmark Perallel? by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      Well considering Oracle's wording is that if you don't agree, you can't use the software, it might be a bit harder than you think.

      Hmmm..... What does use mean?

      Does that mean that if I deploy Oracle that I am required to send copies of the EULA for all my employees to sign? Am I required to forbid from using the database-driven tools until they do?

      If I set up an eCommerce site, do I need to make sure that all visitors agree to the EULA before they can use the site? After all they are using the database too.....

      Seriously, although IANAL, I have trouble imagining Oracle getting a court to uphold this interpretation...

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    7. Re:Oracle Benchmark Perallel? by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Doesn't Oracle have a license that says you can't release benchmark information?

      Yes and just about every lawyer has felt that if a client magazine were willing to go the distance with Oracle they would win in court. First amendment protections would completely override a licensing condition which does nothing to protect copyright. The problem is, who is willing to go toe to toe with Oracle to do benchmarks?

      My guess is what Oracle is really aiming for is a way of getting magazines that do bad benchmarks. Violating the license and then not doing a good job might be enough to show intent to defame...

    8. Re:Oracle Benchmark Perallel? by perlchild · · Score: 1

      You've just highlighted a lot of the problems with EULAs, especially in the server world, well done.

      As far as I know(and this is from memory, and I'm not a lawyer either). The person who gets the license(and pays the fees) is the one who agrees to the Eula, that person is "intended" to be able to bind the whole company who uses the software, and in my jurisdiction, while binding clients is not heard of, they can certainly bind a subcontractant, which is what you presented yourself as earlier.

      When I ask you to do something for me, you are acting as me, if I have an injunction against me not to do something, I can't hire you to do that thing for me, unless the injunction is very lax.

      Most Eulas are written in such an unbalanced manner I'm surprised courts would see them above toilet paper, but again, IANAL. However, my original point was that the right to use Oracle was conditional to agreeing to Oracle's terms(as unbalanced and unreasonable as they may be), whereas writing a book about a piece of hardware you own is certainly a different matter.

      I think the courts need to come out with jurisprudence that says that it is illegal to limit the rights to criticize software you pay for. Oracle wants to limit my right to benchmark them, they can let me use the software for free. Otherwise, if I contract with them, and I find their service or product despicable, ANY limit on my free speech to clarion my unsatisfaction is a dangerous precedent, IMHO, YMMV and again, IANAL.

    9. Re:Oracle Benchmark Perallel? by einhverfr · · Score: 1


      When I ask you to do something for me, you are acting as me, if I have an injunction against me not to do something, I can't hire you to do that thing for me, unless the injunction is very lax.


      In my scenario, I am simply publishing aggregated data. Say, I do database evaluation for companies X, Y, and Z. I do so under a contract which has no NDA clause. I later combine the data from the three companies, remove any identifying information (such as company name, etc.) and publish the aggregated study.

      In this scenario, I am doing this for my own marketing purposes, and *not* for hire under the previous contracts. Therefore, the only thing it seems Oracle could do is to try to track down whose data this came from and try to sue them for not making me sign an NDA. And if I don't publish identifying data, then everyone is safe :-)

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  29. Oh Gawd! - mentifex kook has escaped usenet asylum by Jayfar · · Score: 1

    Just google mentifex kook for further details.

  30. PDF Download by jetnet · · Score: 1

    For those of you who really want this in a PDF format, I have converted it.

    This is the download page, all you have to do is sign up for a free account (I only do this to prevent hot linking of files.)

  31. Me by simpl3x · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm a designer, with some technical inclination, and frankly unless I'm engineering mission critical software, most of the concepts are not that difficult. Do this to open port xxx! So, when I needed to look at my IP Sec to understand how it needed to be programed without paying uunet to do it, I looked around for materials. There wasn't much as far as tutorials go, and uunet did do it for free anyway, but it was mostly just lines of "open port xxx." Oooh, punching holes in a firewall. But that saved me a grand, and as a small business person, this matters.

  32. PDF File by sagenumen · · Score: 5, Informative

    I converted the MS Word to a PDF and it is available on my school's server. They are going to hate me:

    http://www.lehigh.edu/~mlt3/textbook.pdf

    1. Re:PDF File by mandolux · · Score: 1

      Thank you.

    2. Re:PDF File by amaffew · · Score: 1

      Thanks! The sites are swamped and hard to get anything from right now. Matt

    3. Re:PDF File by Tyreth · · Score: 1

      I downloaded this a few weeks ago in PDF format, and never even saw a word format version. So, somewhere, is an official PDF version of this book (besides on my hard disk).

  33. Hah! This is a research project by originalhack · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The good professor is really trying to study just how many people will blindly open a word doc from an untrusted source. What do you want to bet that opening the document in word triggers a counter somewhere?

    1. Re:Hah! This is a research project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hold on. I'm downloading it over and over.

    2. Re:Hah! This is a research project by amaffew · · Score: 1

      Nope sorry...interesting idea though...I took a stand for students everywhere...just like petroleum companies are pricing up gas so too are publishers pricing up textbooks. Someone had to do it.

    3. Re:Hah! This is a research project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First and foremost: you pretty much rule. Superb idea.

      As for the second it's almost rethorical, I'm sure they have access logs somewhere.

    4. Re:Hah! This is a research project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually he's trying to do a study to see how quickly someone on /. will respond with a stupid comment such as this to him posting a word doc.

    5. Re:Hah! This is a research project by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      I thought only Microsoft and the government knew how to use those secret spy features in MS products.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
  34. This isn't a new thing....is it? by homerskid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've been doing this same thing for years now....guess I just never thought to put it up on /. :-)
    Several years ago, when I was studying for my certs, I decided to compile all my material into a book.
    It has since grown into two separate books, one for the CCNA and one for the CCIE.
    While they used to be free, I decided to begin charging a small fee (10 bux), but only enough to cover the costs of my website -- incidentally, I've never really been able to recoup that.

    If anyone is interested, the books, along with loads of free material are available (both online and downloadable) at gdd.net.
    Please note that I do like for folks to register, but it is free and rather painless ;-).

    1. Re:This isn't a new thing....is it? by narcc · · Score: 1

      Please note that I do like for folks to register, but it is free and rather painless ;-).

      Soul Sucker...

    2. Re:This isn't a new thing....is it? by homerskid · · Score: 1

      Hunh? What's wrong with knowing who's using my server?

    3. Re:This isn't a new thing....is it? by narcc · · Score: 1

      It's a joke. (Think back to all those NYT articles posted by Cmdr Taco...)

    4. Re:This isn't a new thing....is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Nice books! Thanks!

      Cabrao

  35. Wikipedia is very close.. by xtal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is the future.. it would be nice for fields like electrical engineering, where the core material was discovered and published several hundred years ago - but you still have to pay $200 every year or so for the texts. A standard reference text that could be improved, peer reviewed, and built upon year after year would be a tremendous boon to mankind. I think of all the useless projects and questions I worked out over the years, imagine if that work went towards improving a collective body of information. Perhaps, something like another collaborative effort we know.

    Yes, this won't work for everything. But things like calculus, fourier transforms, electromagnetics, classical signal processing, statics, dynamics, statistics - this is cookie cutter stuff. Should apply right through the grade schools, too. I suppose I should be thankful those things are even allowed to be taught anymore, because you can do naughty things with them. :-)

    I won't tell you how mad it made me lugging close to 100lbs of books around for 5 years when if things were sane, they could be accessed either online, or via pdf files.

    If anyone wants to be a patron saint - opening those materials up would potentially help a lot of people. Books are very expensive. Moreso outside of the western world.

    --
    ..don't panic
    1. Re:Wikipedia is very close.. by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      This is the future.. it would be nice for fields like electrical engineering, where the core material was discovered and published several hundred years ago - but you still have to pay $200 every year or so for the texts.

      It cuts both ways, tho'. Kreyzig's book Advanced Engineering Mathematics is an GBP 50 book. When I was an undergrad, I got the previous edition, brand new, for GBP 3. The bookstore, despite being on campus, obviously had no idea that maths books don't change much, I found it among the leftover books for obsolete operating systems and the like, which were similarly priced.

      If you're smart, you can leverage the fact that you know more about your chosen subject than the average bookseller does, and hunt out bargains that way.

    2. Re:Wikipedia is very close.. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I tried that once in a Calculus class. The problem set assignments were always: "Problems 2,4-7,9,11 and 14 on page 232."

      The page numbering was not consistent among editions. I didn't get very good grades on the first few assignements...

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  36. Word?! Yikes. by muonzoo · · Score: 3, Informative

    Surely if you wanted to typeset / author a book these days, Word wouldn't be your first choice of editor. Especially in acadameia. Docbook, LaTeX, even the ROFF family would seem more portable in terms of generating useful output. Oh well.

    Once upon a time, Word really stuggled with documents over 256 pages. I'm sure that's fixed, but what about revision control, and single point of truth? Surely it has to be a pain to incorporate all your examples in the Word document as copies of what you were really using.

    Does someone have a good place to chuck it in PDF form? I'd be quite happy to render it from Word to PDF. (At least that's slightly less evil).

    1. Re:Word?! Yikes. by amaffew · · Score: 1

      I have in in PDF on http://www.lulu.com/learningbydoing and in Word form on my website http://www.spjc.edu/star/cisco/Matt/list_of_curren t_papers_and_brief.htm Plus other people have been putting up either mirrors of it or putting it on their website for downloading. In my email responses I have been adding those sites in case lulu or my website is slow (as they have been all day)...if you want me to put your site down as a mirror then just send it to me and I will do it. Thanks again Matt

    2. Re:Word?! Yikes. by muonzoo · · Score: 1

      Thanks -- too bad the /. editors didn't decide to post a link to the PDF. That was just asking for trouble. Cheers.

  37. Back in the old days when dinosaurs... by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

    ...roamed the earth and I was still a university student 6-10 of us used to get to gether, buy one copy of each book and take them down to the local copy shop who's owner lived off such business and hence asked did not piss and moan about copyrights. The resultant stacks of A4 sheets were then fitted in a spiral bindings. It was clunky but lasted surprisingly well and with 10-12 books at $40-100 each you usually had enough saved up over every second semester or so to upgrade your PC to handle the latest video games, drawing software math suite etc. or to buy some other small luxury like a rusty old VW Golf.

    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
  38. Fast Mirrors Available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've hosted both the PDF version and the DOC versions up on a fast FTP for a day or two. Be nice to the FTP and it will be nice to you.

    ftp://files.wgo-radio.com/ccna/

    P.S. Would log in but the /. mail servers don't wanna send me my password it seems =[

  39. Re:Save download times (Kidding) by landoltjp · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I should have indicated that I was joking.

  40. Screenshots of websites? by Diabolical · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Downloaded the thing and read a few pages... he starts almost imediately with a nono regarding websites. Screenshots of websites where to find information complete with arrows to parts of that image... nice.. What if Cisco revamps their website?

    459 pages is the page count of this book... at least.. that's what MS Word 2k is telling me.

    1. Re:Screenshots of websites? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if Cisco revamps their website?

      I think the links and screenshots will be out of date then.

      CAVEAT: I'm not a network administrator, but play one on TV.

  41. Crazy Whining! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yay, he published a textbook. It's a available as a free download! Yay!

    What!??!? It's in M$ Word format! May he burn in hell, it's probably crap anyways. Why didn't he post it in PDF, HTML, XML, ASCII, or OGG format?!

    Morons. The doc opens fine in OpenOffice and Wordperfect 8!

    If he had posted in PDF, I'm sure there would be idiots complaining that the font size was too small, not enough colors, the professor could have read the book and recorded it as a MP3 file. The usual crap.

    Pathetic. Word is the #1 word processor. Deal with it, face that fact, you probably work around in your dealing with clients, colleagues, parole officers, etc. So what's the big deal now?!

  42. Fast Mirrors Available Part 2 by Jagobah · · Score: 1

    This time, logged in and ready to provide clickable links to both PDF and DOC versions of the book:

    Preface

    DOC version

    PDF version

    1. Re:Fast Mirrors Available Part 2 by amaffew · · Score: 1

      Would you mind if I added this to my information when people request it? Thanks Matt

    2. Re:Fast Mirrors Available Part 2 by Jagobah · · Score: 1

      Not at all. Feel free to distribute the links... so far I've only seen about 110 PDF downloads, 35 DOC downloads, and 22 for the preface. Total bandwidth was under a gig. We've got a few terabytes a month we can eat through. We'll survive =D

      I'd also like someone to mod up the links so they get more exposure, but it's just wishful thinking.

  43. Nobody reads the manual, they write their own. by KevinDumpsCore · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of the article: "If nobody reads the manual, why are bookshops overflowing with computing books?"

    The next time someone knocks the quality of Open Source documentation written by volunteers, consider the quality of the work by our professional colleagues. Grass-roots efforts like this don't prove there is a pent-up demand for technical documentation that starts from first principles.

    In the meantime, someone needs to teach the good professor DocBook...

  44. WikiBooks by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

    Have you heard of WikiBooks? It's an open content textbook creation site, similar to wikipedia, and is precisely intended for what you describe. It's still pretty early in terms of content development, but there's a few nice textbooks there already.

  45. I read the first 120 pages. by Baka_kun · · Score: 0

    then i threw it away. this "book" teches you absolutely nothing about HOW the stuff works, liks the osi layers etc etc, what layer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 is etc.

    I think students, who acctually think about doing more than just a ccna, like having knowledge that will let you explain to management why stuff works like this and that, will prefer the CCNA 1-4 v 3.0 material.

    of course, its free. but its not good enough for me to consider recommending it to my friends before reccomending them to buy the whole cisco curriculum kit.

    my dollar :o

  46. Oops... by KevinDumpsCore · · Score: 1

    > Grass-roots efforts like this don't prove there is a pent-up demand for technical documentation that starts from first principles.

    Oops... That should have read: "Grass-roots efforts like this do prove there is a pent-up demand for technical documentation that starts from first principles."

    When the "Submit" and "Preview" buttons are next to each other, accidents like this sometimes happen.

  47. Save your school by EvilStein · · Score: 4, Informative

    here is another mirror, on what is probably a much much faster pipe. :)

    (could only squeeze 48K/sec off your school..)

  48. I just copyrighted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... the phrases "en", "conf t", "wr mem" and many others. The good professor now owes me big time!

  49. Bravo, man! by Maljin+Jolt · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Superiority of open culture over corporate culture has been examplified.

    Superiority of law enforcement over sane intellect will be examplified later.

    --
    There you are, staring at me again.
  50. Re:creators create yOUR own survival manual by enigmals1 · · Score: 0

    This post made ZERO sense whatsoever.

    If I got an e-mail with this exact text my spam filter would have caught it in a heartbeat. ;p

  51. Continuing this trend... by orim · · Score: 1

    I volunteer to print the manual out, scan it into TIFF images, tie them together, and publish it all as one big image. A mere 1Tb! Get yours now!

    --
    "If you could only see what I've seen with your eyes..." - Roy Batty
  52. This book sucks by Animats · · Score: 3, Interesting
    • Lesson 1: Finding CISCO's web site.
    • Lesson 2: Opening a "MS-DOS" window on Windows 95/98. (Not an NT-family OS, even though this is a corporate networking class.)
    • Lesson 3: Installing a network card. ("Try to see how a Token Ring NIC differs from an Ethernet NIC.")
    • A little further along, there are chapters on binary arithmetic, hex arithmetic, IP addressing, and the symbols Cisco uses in their manuals. Then, immediately after the chapter on IP addressing, things suddenly get complicated:

      • You are the network administrator for an upstart website publishing company. They have offices in two adjacent buildings on different floors. Lately, they have realized the costs of their individual Internet accounts far exceeds the costs of installing and maintaining a T-1 line. As the network guru you are to design a network that will utilize FDDI between the buildings. The west building uses floors 3, 4, and 5 for the sales and admin staff. Here you will want to use a CISCO Catalyst 5000 with a FDDI module, a management module, and a 24-port switch module. From there each floor will distribute access via a CISCO 1924 switch to each of its 20 nodes (workstations, servers, and printers). The east building uses floors 1 through 5 for the design and engineering staff. Here you will want to use a CISCO Catalyst 5500 with a FDDI module, a management module, and a 24-port switch module. You will also have a CISCO 2610 router with T-1 module, and a Kentrox CSU/DSU for your full T-1 line. Your ISP, ComBase has sold you two blocks of 62 IP addresses: 198.74.56.x (1-62) and (65-126). Combase will also provide the DNS services, unlike most ISP's where more than 24 IP's are ordered. Design your network, including cabling and grounds, to include all IP's, subnet masks, gateways, and anything else you need to include.

      This is before they've mentioned how to configure, operate or use any of that stuff. Wierd.

    Some quotes:

    "Supercomputer--See Nasa, Berkely, MIT, etc. Kind of like the W.O.P.R. in Wargames."

    1. Re:This book sucks by Zarhan · · Score: 1

      I have to agree. From the Slashdot blurb, I thought that this might be an "alternative guide" for Cisco stuff if you are already familiar with the technology (and maybe have experience configuring other routers or maybe just Linux/Unix boxes and are just getting your first IOS box in front of you). This is just...bland.

      Those exercises in chapter 1 are hilarious. "What .EXE files are found in windows\system folder?". C'mon, I thought this was about networking if not Cisco-specific stuff.

      I didn't bother to read it all the way through, but it's talking about such groundbreaking tools as "ping" and "traceroute" (still in Windows) somewhere around page 120. The index is at the end, and it seems that it does cover RIP at least.

      I guess it wouldn't really bother me all that much if the good professor would clearly mention that this is course material for Computer Networking 101, and has NOTHING to do with anything that is really Cisco-specific. More like Windows-specific.

      Well, I guess I was expecting a guide on how to set up VRF's and configure MPLS traffic engineering based on the remarks at Cisco. For a "network basics"-stuff it might actually be a good one, altough I would assume that anybody that is going to set up a network knows at least basics in Windows/Unix and would only list that as a prequisite. Covering Windows command line fundamentals in what is supposed to be a networking guide is just silly.

    2. Re:This book sucks by amaffew · · Score: 3, Informative

      Keep reading...that is the stuff for the section on "Networking Fundamentals." MPLS? Come on...this is a CCNA book...that comes later in CCNP...there are tons of books out there at the CCNP and CCIE level some are good and most are bad...not too many people try to write the entry level stuff because you have such a wide audience with such a variety of learning styles...you really have to cover all the bases...later on you will see some more fun stuff like writing a pseudo-protocol inspector using ACL's and closing security holes with ACLS...that certainly does not appear in Cisco's curriculum. I do appreciate the comments...the new book has the same stuff for 95/98 because a lot of schools still use them, but I have also added a section on Windows 2K/ME/XP and one on using Knoppix. Hey, I had to start somewhere. Input is what will make this "ok" book even better! Thanks again!

    3. Re:This book sucks by evilviper · · Score: 1
      This is before they've mentioned how to configure, operate or use any of that stuff. Wierd.

      No. It sounds more like the official Cisco books now, actually. They love to give you a quick chapter on something quite complex where they barely tell you anything about it, test you on it, then actually explain it better in future chapters...

      I really hated Cisco's program... Lots of verbatim memorization, and hoop-jumping. Very little learning.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:This book sucks by Comen · · Score: 1

      I am really still shocked that the slashdot crowd here has not already torn this book apart with stuff like this in there:

      "Many operating systems (windows-based too) use DOS commands for updates, patches, and maintenance. I know the Novell system frequently makes use of changing file attributes before applying new patches to the operating system. These are done with DOS-like commands. UNIX/LINUX is heavily DOS-command style oriented. If you want to get into computer security then you will have to live, eat, and breath DOS and UNIX."

      What DOS has to do with Cisco is beyond me.
      Maybe typing ping or something?
      Cisco IOS is allot more UNIX like than DOS like. but even then its its own OS for sure.

    5. Re:This book sucks by Comen · · Score: 1

      Yea I read some more, and agree this book sucks, any other starter cisco book has got to be better than this!

  53. Save the schools - mirror here! :P by EvilStein · · Score: 2
  54. Illiteracy by ColonelPanic · · Score: 1

    hes dumbed down the manual to make room for the computer illiterate..

    a sepperate class

    If only "computer illiteracy" were the only kind we had to worry about...

    --
    "Skill shows through where genius wears thin." -Wittgenstein || Religion: uniting aviation and architecture.
    1. Re:Illiteracy by jtev · · Score: 1

      Big time dittos man, big time dittos. The growing illteracy in this country is a major problem. We sould be embarased about having higer illteracy rates than Iraq and Cuba, let alone most of europe. For most people learning to read isn't that difficult. We need some way to encourage people to learn, and to read.

      --
      That which is done from love exists beyond good and evil
    2. Re:Illiteracy by Kishar · · Score: 1
      *cough*
      No definitions found for "embarased", perhaps you mean:
      web1913: Embarrassed
      wn: embarrassed

      By the way, Americans aren't as illiterate as you may have been led to believe.


      How literate is the adult population?
      Very few adults in the US are truly illiterate. Rather, there are many adults with low literacy skills who lack the foundation they need to find and keep decent jobs, support their children's education, and participate actively in civic life. Between 21 and 23 percent of the adult population, or approximately 44 million people, according to the National Adult Literacy Survey (NALS), scored in Level 1 (see description above). Another 25-28 percent of the adult population, or between 45 and 50 million people, scored in Level 2. Literacy experts believe that adults with skills at Levels 1 and 2 lack a sufficient foundation of basic skills to function successfully in our society.

      Many factors help to explain the relatively large number of adults in Level 1. Twenty-five percent of adults in Level 1 were immigrants who may have just been learning to speak English. More than 60 percent didn't complete high school. More than 30 percent were over 65. More than 25 percent had physical or mental conditions that kept them from fully participating in work, school, housework, or other activities, and almost 20 percent had vision problems that affected their ability to read print. For more facts and statistics, visit the NIFL Literacy Facts page.

      http://www.nifl.gov/nifl/facts/facts_overview.ht ml

      This is the part that bothers me:


      [...]
      The mean prose literacy scores of U.S. adults with 1-3 years of college, ranked 15th out of 19 countries; and
      The mean prose literacy scores of U.S. adults with a bachelor's degree or higher, ranked 5th.
    3. Re:Illiteracy by jtev · · Score: 1

      sorry, I didn't bother to spell check. Truly illterate or functionaly illterate are distinctions that simply not that usefull. It is scary that in prose literacy we ranked so low on people with 1-3 years of college, however that statistic may simply mean that more americans with poor literacy don't realise they have poor literacy, and attempt college.

      --
      That which is done from love exists beyond good and evil
    4. Re:Illiteracy by Goozbach · · Score: 1

      $ dict higer No definitions found for "higer", perhaps you mean: web1913: Higre Higher Tiger Huger Hider Hiper Hirer Hiver wn: higher liger Niger tiger hiker hirer gazetteer: Hilger Tiger Huger easton: Niger hitchcock: Niger I love these people.

      --

      I used to but then I quit.

    5. Re:Illiteracy by Goozbach · · Score: 1

      damn formatting. do'h

      --

      I used to but then I quit.

    6. Re:Illiteracy by jtev · · Score: 1

      Typo: a mistake in typing. it's pretty damned usless to attack them unless you're just a stupid dick who's unable to make a cogent argument. Does this describe you?

      --
      That which is done from love exists beyond good and evil
    7. Re:Illiteracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget tadjikistan.

    8. Re:Illiteracy by jtev · · Score: 1

      My God that's depressing. A country poorer than afganistan has better literacy than us. If I didn't think suicide was wrong I'd slit my wrists.

      --
      That which is done from love exists beyond good and evil
    9. Re:Illiteracy by blasphemi · · Score: 1
      The growing illteracy in this country is a major problem. We sould be embarased about having higer illteracy rates than Iraq and Cuba, let alone most of europe.

      Parts of Europe and possibly Cuba has higher literacy rates than the US, but I highly doubt Iraq. From the CIA World Factbook:

      Literacy:

      definition: age 15 and over can read and write
      total population: 40.4%
      male: 55.9%
      female: 24.4% (2003 est.)
    10. Re:Illiteracy by jtev · · Score: 1

      During the first Gulf War I heard 95% literacy quoted for Iraq in the news, but I forget which outlet. I think maybe ABC. Of course that was 13 years ago, but it's kinda odd for it to drop that much in such a short time. Of course the numbers I heard may have been wrong to.

      --
      That which is done from love exists beyond good and evil
  55. -1: Retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Seriously. People who modded that shit up: what the fuck?

  56. Word file? by Thaelon · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm appalled. Not because it's a Microsoft product, but because Word does such a shoddy job of handling large files. It should have been written in LaTeX, then published as a post script or pdf. For those not familiar, Word chokes on that 5MB file. You can write entire books in LaTeX (or magazines since those technically contain more data).

    --

    Question everything

    1. Re:Word file? by locutus2k · · Score: 1

      I agree with you but not for the same reasons. Word is very insecure, in fact, it is very simple to see all kinds of personal information based on the metadata that all word files contain. Simple open this monster in a text editor, and start digging. For someone who is aparently a very security minded person, how can he possibly publish something like this. This file should have been a PDF or something much more secure than word. I haven't read it yet (still downloading at a blazing 2.1K/s) but already I question his ability.

    2. Re:Word file? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TeX, Metafont, Metapost, LaTeX, Postscript, xml -- it's truly amazing what can be done these days.
      Combine them with a bit of Perl or Python -- C# even -- and you can perform miracles. Add a bit of Image Magick and a Gimp script in Scheme or Perl -- nothing will be impossible for you.

  57. textbook file sharing by peter303 · · Score: 1

    I read somewhere (but couldnt find the reference today) that some people are scanning in textbook pages for file sharing. At an average of $108 per (legal) textbook and approaching $0.50 per (legal) page, this stimulates the file sharing market. Used to be you could find reprinted textbooks (on crappy paper) in Asian cities for dimes on the dollar. Now they may be available on CD-ROMS at pennies on the dollar.

    Due to the unreliability of scan-to-text conversion, this technology had to wait until the scanned page-image bandwidths were economical, i.e. shared video files paved the way. You also get the formating and figures in the page-images.

  58. Doesn't seem so strange... by Guiness17 · · Score: 1

    I seem to have done this a few times - although I'm surprised something as mature as Cicso routers would require it.

    One of the first '3rd party' manuals I wrote was for the error handling features in Visual Workbench 3.0 for the Mac. The documentation that came with it wasn't (documentation).

    --
    Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...
  59. Been there, done that. by Deagol · · Score: 1
    When I was a poor lad in college one year, I copied the entire contents of every textbook I needed for the fall semester the summer before. I bought the books, photocopied them in the library a few chapters at a time on my lunch breaks ($0.03/page, at the time, when the the biggest copy card was purchased), then got a full refund. :)

    Of course, that was a huge time sink, and it still did cost me about 20% of the books' price when all was said and done (quality data binders cost good money, after all). But man, after years of getting bent over the barrel by the local book cartel, it sure felt good.

  60. No shit. by Deagol · · Score: 1
    There was some fat bastard prof at Purdue who taught "business 101" -- basics of accounting. He wrote the 1000+ page tome we were forced to use. To salt the wond, he would change the problems every semester, making the $80 book a candidate to replace the Sears Catalog for wiping your ass.

    No, no conflict of interest at all. Somehow I doubt the basic accounting principles change all that frequently. The guy was such an asshat. He routinely derided students who dared to express confusion about his lecture to his 500+ seat lecture hall.

  61. Go easy on the new guy by Featureless · · Score: 1

    He must not be from around here.

  62. Re:Eeeeek... - Zipped PDF Torrent by MarcoPon · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Converted to PDF & Zipped (2MB).
    Here's the torrent link:
    Torrent

    Bye!

    --

    SeqBox
  63. Experience at University of Illinois by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I had a communications professor (the famous Jack Jones) at the University of Illinois (Chicago campus) who had students buy his (as in he authored them) books for class. Fortunately the guy didn't abuse his position and publish a new edition every semester, but he could have.

    As I understand it, many times it's the department as a whole that chooses books for individual classes. In many cases I couldn't fathom why they were using a different edition than last semester or why they would do stuff like buy Tweedle-Deitel and Tweedle-Dumb's books on C instead of just going with the one that defined the language (C Programming Language, Standard C Library), which were more concise and cheaper!

  64. Kudos to Prof & to Those Sneering at Word by Begs · · Score: 1

    First, kudos to the prof for doing what he thought best for his students.

    Second, for those sneering at Word, I have done commercial work in Word in single files from a few bytes to over 100MB. I did it that way because my clients asked for it in that format, No other format was of interest to them nor were suggestions for alternate methods such as simple HTML considered. Their personnel could handle hyperlinks just fine in Word, thank you.

    It's what your audience and clients want that counts. I did over 50 manuals for one client, all stable all successful.

    Open office is a good set of apps. HTML is a good presentation method. The same applies to the application methods and applications available in Microsoft Office.

    I'm retired now and moving over to Linux for fun. I don't have to satisfy any clients so fooling around in Linux is fine. Maybe someday OO will be on a par with MO. But, right now as close as OO is, it isn't quite there.

    If you work with business documentation, you better know MO.

    Flame away!

  65. Cisco Press has no association.... by p.rican · · Score: 1

    with Cisco Inc. Just finished Cisco Training and the class used the two Cisco Press books, (Intro and ICND) for training. The instructor made it clear that the Cisco Press books have no affiliation with Cisco Inc.

    --

    /. --"Demented and sad....but social" -Judd Nelson

  66. Adware in this text book... by beest · · Score: 1

    Isn't it a bit unprofessional to have adware (possibly spyware) with Rogaine advertisements in the top bar of internet explorer while documenting Cisco webpage browsing? Check out the screenshots of the webpages in his Cisco textbook "Learning by doing" and you'll know what I'm talking about...

  67. OpenBSD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm assuming the course doesn't cover how to replace your expensive Cisco gear with cheaper, more functional and secure OpenBSD boxes?

  68. You get what you pay for? by Percy_Blakeney · · Score: 3, Insightful
    After reading the first couple of chapters, I must admit that I am not impressed. My first impression is that he has a lot of experience with Cisco equipment, but doesn't have an in-depth understand of networking principles. For example, while introducing the OSI model, he says:

    Layer 5: The Session Layer... This is the layer that says "HEY!" I want to establish a networking session. In fact, if you have internet access from your home computer then you may even see the message "establishing session" during the connection process.

    That's just wrong. The OSI model is different from what actually happens in the TCP/IP protocol stack. The Presentation and Session layers aren't actually present in the real TCP/IP world, so claiming that something happens there is incorrect. That "establishing session" message is taking place either at the Application or Transport levels, but not at the non-existant Session layer.

    In addition, his informal prose ("old school", "friggin", etc...) gave the book a definite unprofessional feel; some people may think the book is more accessible this way, but I felt that it was a bit sloppy.

  69. Re:THIS IS THE PROBLEM WITH ACADEMICS (THE C.V.) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah.. off topic to know that the author of a book can't pass 4 standard tests on the topic he is teaching.. :monkey:

  70. Same thing for Red Hat Linux by Nailer · · Score: 1

    Heya guys,

    I work for Red Hat teaching their stuff now, but before that I wrote and taught my own training course.

    All of the training materials, including the full courseware, is available free from here (burn the contents of the whole lna4 dir to a CD).

    I own copyright for it, you're licensed to use it under the FDL.

    Mike MacCana

  71. A good technical book... by mi · · Score: 1

    would've been written with LaTeX

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.