Slashdot Mirror


DVD Player as 802.11b Peripheral

sysadmn writes "Instead of building a PVR from a computer, why not let your DVD player access the computer you already have? That's the thinking behind Sonicblue's new Go-Video D2730. The just-announced DVD player will use an 802.11b (Wi-Fi) wireless network connection to access content on PCs, such as photos, music and videos. The player is aggressively priced at about $250 US and is due out in first quarter 2003. Full details are on CNET."

191 comments

  1. Is this really priced competatively? by ikewillis · · Score: 0

    For the same price you could put together a cheap computer which could decode media in formats this player isn't likely to support (i.e. DivX) This seems like it's a bit too high tech for Joe Sixpack, but not priced competatively for today's stylish geek on the go.

    1. Re:Is this really priced competatively? by TurdTapper · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For only 250, this would seem like a really good idea for the general public. Those that aren't going to worry about the different formats.

      Sometimes the price is worth it, and 250 compared to some of the hassle seems pretty cheap to me.

      --
      A man with a gun is called a citizen. A man without a gun is called a subject.
    2. Re:Is this really priced competatively? by ergo98 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well firstly your solution presumes that one's time is free: If you put a value on the hours you spend putting the system together, configuring all of the software, etc, suddenly it isn't economical. Rather than seeing it as a hobbyist, think "If I were to go into business making these for other people, what would I charge?". I suspect that you'd be surprized. Of course on top of all of that is the expense and availability issues in finding a "stereo component" sized computer case that integrates into an AV system (no dropping a giant beige case sputtering away with a dozen fans isn't viable).

      Secondarily, it's highly likely that they're using one of the new Sigma Designs chipsets, the new one which includes some Divx support. Indeed if I were to build a PC based playback device (the only thing holding me back is the case, as previously mentioned. For fans I'd reduce that by using a Via C3 with passive cooling), I'd base it around a Sigma Designs XCard.

    3. Re:Is this really priced competatively? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      "no dropping a giant beige case sputtering away with a dozen fans isn't viable"

      hey! it's worked for Dell, Hateway, HP, Compaq etc etc etc

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    4. Re:Is this really priced competatively? by dustman · · Score: 1

      Well firstly your solution presumes that one's time is free: If you put a value on the hours you spend putting the system together, configuring all of the software, etc, suddenly it isn't economical.

      We've all heard this argument before, but I still don't buy it. If, rather than vegetating in front of the TV, or playing counter-strike, or going out to eat, I can spend 2 nights figuring out and configuring XYZ, while saving myself a couple of hundred bucks and ending up with something *better* than just forking over my money, then it is economical, by quite a margin.

      As a professional programmer, if I were to bill these hours spent, I would get $200-$600... But I haven't "lost" this money by spending my time doing it this way.

    5. Re:Is this really priced competatively? by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      Well in this case it COST $250, so it's difficult to save yourself "a coupl eof hundred bucks" having to buy all of the hardware.

      However that's not my point: The original poster was asking if it was competitively priced - Well 99.99% of home electronics buyers are not systems administrators, programmers, or even really computer hobbyists. It is those people that I'm talking about, specifically that they can't throw these together themselves anyways.

      I may know that it only takes a mechanic a couple of hours to fix my car, but that doesn't somehow mean that therefore I can just do it myself.

  2. Pr0n In the Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Got a WAP right above my desk. Free pr0n for everyone!

    1. Re:Pr0n In the Office by yelloh99 · · Score: 1

      I've always wondered, is there a filter for the word porn , or do people just self censor?

    2. Re:Pr0n In the Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now you know...

  3. Wouldn't want to risk it by ekrout · · Score: 2, Informative

    Every product that I've ever bought from SonicBlue has been malformed and returned to sender.

    The technology sounds cool, but I'll probably wait until it's available from another vendor.

    --

    If you celebrate Xmas, befriend me (538
    1. Re:Wouldn't want to risk it by fatwreckfan · · Score: 2

      I have a Rio Volt (which is made by SonicBlue unless I'm mistaken) and I've had no problems with it whatsoever. Maybe I was just lucky?

    2. Re:Wouldn't want to risk it by dschuetz · · Score: 2

      I've had good luck with four Rio / SonicBlue items -- three Rio Receivers (MP3/ethernet/stereo components) and a Rio Riot (20G portable MP3 player).

      Plus, a lot of what they do is linux based, so this might be hackable. If so, and if this avoids a noisy fan, it might be a great set-top box "terminal" for a centralized PVR system. Maybe. (I haven't read the article yet).

    3. Re:Wouldn't want to risk it by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 2

      I've never had a problem with my ReplayTV. Perhaps you've had incredibly back luck?

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    4. Re:Wouldn't want to risk it by yelloh99 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I agree, I bought a cd player with 30 seconds of memory. So now when I hit a bump I hear the skip 30 seconds later.

    5. Re:Wouldn't want to risk it by prator · · Score: 2
      Those are actually made by iRiver.


      -prator

    6. Re:Wouldn't want to risk it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +2 yet he admits he hasnt read the article? Rearrange the following words "moderators", "crack", "on", "sucking", "pipe"

    7. Re:Wouldn't want to risk it by wurp · · Score: 2

      What's your experience with your Replay tv? I have a Tivo, and the Replay is tempting to me because of the extra features. But... I've heard that Replay is not very good about always recording season passes.

      Does your Replay record what you want it to record? Is it convenient to find new programs to record and set them up?

    8. Re:Wouldn't want to risk it by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 2

      THe only time I have any trouble is when a show is preempted for basketball. Even then, with the show being relocated to Saturday afternoon, the Replay usually catches it. I have no trouble finding shows either through browsing the listings, or by using the search function. I don't make much use of the Replay Channels feature, but I can see where it would be useful. Very satisfied with it, over all.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    9. Re:Wouldn't want to risk it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The technology sounds dumb.

      Quality digital video just doesn't FIT in 802.11b bandwidth. If it did we wouldn't need firewire, just USB. Granted you may not care if you're watching on a 12" Sears TV but if you buy this gadget aren't you more likely to have a 48" rear projection at least?

    10. Re:Wouldn't want to risk it by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2

      If the stream is already pre-compressed but is properly buffered and uncompressed on the recieving and, such as DiVX or DVDs, it _might_ work fine. I'd want 100bTX even though DVD is only about 10mbps.

      If one has a 48" projection set, I really doubt that DivX will really hold water anyway, and some DVD encodings show drawbacks too.

    11. Re:Wouldn't want to risk it by theLOUDroom · · Score: 2

      I have and rio volt and the baclight died right before the warranty expired. The anti-skip protection is pretty crappy too. The meshanism is just too susceptible to skips, I have to keep my walking under a certain speed, hold it in my hand, or learn to walk like some sort of ninja.
      Other than that it's been a very good device. Good battery life, and the new rom offered major improvements over the orignal one too (It boots twice as fast as it used to). Note: Your backlight probably hasn't died because now the backlight defaults to always off unless you press a button. When mine shipped, the backlight defaulted to aways one whenever the unit was plugged into a wall outlet/car adaptor. I don't know if they ever reall did fix this design flaw with the rio volt or if they are just relying on their software workaround to make sure the backlight doesn't die before the warranty expires.
      Another side note, the rio volt is actually made by another company. When it came out, the AVC Soul which was availible at mp3playerstore.com was the exact same thing for $10 less.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
  4. Fast enough? by gzsfrk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I notice on home home 802.11b network that the 11mbps connection between my den PC and upstairs office PC is nowhere near fast enough to stream high quality compressed digital video (e.g. DivX). How is this player going to be able to pull it off?

    --
    m@
    1. Re:Fast enough? by phurley · · Score: 5, Informative

      802.11b is plenty fast to stream DivX. Now as some point you could have too many players (and other 802.11b devices) in a home (possibly a bigger problem in apartment buildings?) trying to share the same bandwidth.

      --
      Home Automation & Linux -- now I know I'm a geek
    2. Re:Fast enough? by brunes69 · · Score: 5, Informative

      A DVD quality SVCD runs at arounf 3000 kbps (around 3 Mbps), and a simmilar quality DivX around 1500 kbps (1.5 Mbps). So I don't know what you are doing at your place, but a 11 Mbps conneciton should handle them just fine. In face, my 10 Mbps nic can play a SVCD over the LAN perfectly.

    3. Re:Fast enough? by Hayzeus · · Score: 5, Interesting
      11MBPS is probably fast enough; however, it's worth pointing out that 11MBPS isn't guaranteed by 802.11B. In fact, the connection speed can fall back to fairly slow speeds in the presence of a less than perfect RF link. I can't recall the bottom end off hand (1MBPS?).

      It may be that you are seeing partial signal blockage or reflectance problems between your office and den. Try using something to benchmark the actual connection speed (if you haven't done so already).

    4. Re:Fast enough? by tswinzig · · Score: 4, Funny

      Are your floors or ceilings made of metal, per chance?

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    5. Re:Fast enough? by afidel · · Score: 4, Informative

      11Mbps is the through the air "wire" speed that is the maximum speed that all data is being sent. The amount of usefull data on even the best .11b equipment is about 6.3Mbps or ~700KB/s which should be more then enough for DivX and even most MPEG2 streams but some could theoretically be 9.8Mbps but average 4.7 Mbps typical rate for movie on single layer with 3 multichannel audio tracks.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    6. Re:Fast enough? by genka · · Score: 4, Informative

      11Mbps is a "marketing number". The protocol has a lot of overhead- data that is transmitted for servicing the connection. When it comes to speed 802.11B is moving your data (payload), it is about 3-4 MBps, shared between two directions.

    7. Re:Fast enough? by dereklam · · Score: 1

      The bandwidth also doesn't take into account the time needed to encrypt and decrypt the packets, assuming you've locked down your wireless AP.

    8. Re:Fast enough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said his connection does 11 millibps, not 11 megabps.

    9. Re:Fast enough? by xchino · · Score: 2

      11 Mps may be fast enough to stream a high quality divx movie, but not if you're using your network for anything else. I stream movies all the time from one room to another over 80.11b, and it usually works ok. However, if I'm d/ling from IRC or Kazaa or something, it begins to get quite choppy, and usually desynchronizes the sound. If you have a second computer pulling the stream, it becomes unwatchable on both. If you ever have gotten 11Mbps over 802.11b than you're as cool as the guy that always connects at 56.7Kpbs. My experience shows that ~9Mpbs is average, and anything above 10Mps flat is excellent.

      --
      Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.
    10. Re:Fast enough? by holeydonut · · Score: 1

      I've had this issue as well, it seems that if I have two components using 802.11b to access the network, then transfer speeds between the two machines creeps to a halt. I do not think that it has to do with signal strength, but I suspect that may be the case. In any case, the result is that I cannot transfer a 192 kbps MP3 file without jitter and skipping.

      Transfers where only one device is wireless go much more quickly. In case it matters, the clients are using the Linksys WPC11 PCMCIA cards and the access point is a Linksys BWFW11S4 combination router/accesspoint.

    11. Re:Fast enough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      This box will not play DivX -- at least, according to the news.com article. It will only play MPEG1 and 2 (for video) and WMA and MP3 (for audio).

      That means that to play back MPEG2, you're really going to be talking about 320x240 or 480x480 (SVCD) res. only... 640x480 will be too big to fit in WiFi.

      Of course, from the news.com article it's clear that WiFi is an OPTION, not default-- default is 10/100 Ethernet.

      All of this is interesting, but if you have a PlayStation 2, you would be much better off buying QCast from BroadQ -- www.broadq.com -- which allows your PS2 to pull OGG, MP3, JPG, MPG1/2/4, DivX 3, 4, and 5 and more off your PC...

      That, and it will be able to do progressive output, HD resolution (with component cabling), and is future-proof (software upgradable)...

      Oh, and it's $49.95 -- if you have a PS2 and a Network Adapter, and the PS2 already plays DVD's!!!!

      Not to mention the obvious... you can play games on your PS2!!!

      I have this software, and it rocks. Why it's not covered on /. or elsewhere is totally beyond me...

    12. Re:Fast enough? by gzsfrk · · Score: 1

      Then I'm not sure what the problem is; my meter is registering 60% signal strength and it shows 11mbps as the connection speed. But whenever I try to stream a divx from my office computer, it goes veeeerrryy slowly, playing a few seconds, then syncing back up for awhile, playing a few seconds, etc... I just assumed that it was because of the compression, that there needed to be quite a bit of read-ahead in the file. (Of course, I know nothing of the DivX algorithm, so take that for the naive statement that it is) Cheers, m@

      --
      m@
    13. Re:Fast enough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> When it comes to speed 802.11B is moving your
      >> data (payload), it is about 3-4 MBps, shared
      >> between two directions.

      3-4 MBps = 24-32Mbps that is WAY higher than your so called 11Mbps "marketing number"

    14. Re:Fast enough? by marshac · · Score: 1

      Not a problem. There are 3 non-overlapping channels in the 802.11b spectrum.

    15. Re:Fast enough? by outsider007 · · Score: 2

      The player probably isn't fast enough to decode the divX anyway, it takes about a 600mhz PC to play divX smoothly. All it will be able to handle is vcd and svcd like every other player on the market.

      I'd rather see a divX player for the (modded) XBox.

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    16. Re:Fast enough? by Bopper · · Score: 2, Informative

      Check out the press release:

      http://www.sonicblue.com/company/press.asp?ID=580

      The D2730 works with either a PCMCIA Ethernet Adapter (included) or an optional PCMCIA 802.11b Wireless Network Card and can stream MPEG1 and MPEG2 video files that are compressed at bitrates up to 3 Mbps.

      So, it will work on a good 802.11b wireless link, as long as the connection speed doesn't fall back to below 3 Mbps (the 802.11b standard says the fallback rates are 5.5, 2, and 1 Mbps). WEP, if its there, can lower the rate as well by 20-50%.

      There is no mention of DivX or other formats in the press release, so you can assume anything other than MPEG1/2 is not supported. I would assume that even the MPEG file has to be VCD/SVCD/XVCD compliant.

    17. Re:Fast enough? by afidel · · Score: 2

      Full res MPEG-2 with 3 audio subchannels averages 4.7Mbps well withing what good .11b gear can handle in most environments. This means that yes you should be able to rip dvd's and play the mpeg2 files directly off the big hard drive(s) in the home file server =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    18. Re:Fast enough? by druzicka · · Score: 1

      The protocol has a lot of overhead- data that is transmitted for servicing the connection.

      The 802.11b protocol overhead doesn't drag down performance. Rather, half-duplex communication and the HUGE percentage of retransmissions that occur is what limits the actual performance to less than half of maximum throughput. As soon as you put some additional hosts on the wireless network and/or the Access Point is in a different room than the wireless client, performance is going to go into the pooper.

      --
      If Happy Fun Ball begins to smoke, get away immediately. Seek shelter and cover head.
    19. Re:Fast enough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's not true... have you USED 802.11b to stream large-format MPEG2 in a home environment?

      I HAVE-- from one Replay 4500 to another via Wet 11-- and it is the SUCK -- even if they're right next to each other... Now, Replay's will record in low-res low bitrate, so to check this, you need to use the highest quality possible record settings.

      Even if the "link" says 11mbit, it's not-- you have to do something like transfer a file between two points and check out the stats on the transfer-- prefereably with a history graph, or something-- to see what it really does. Usually much less than 11mbit -- 3-4mbit -- on average-- with dips between zero and spikes to 6 or 7...

      The issue isn't "peak" bandwidth, and-- to a degree-- it's not even average bandwidth-- 802.11b is very prone to PL and latency due to interference... it's very, very far from likely that you're going to be able to get 4-6mbit MPEG2 over 802.11b without a lot of intelligent data buffering...

      Speaking of which, according to a friend who has QCast (I've never used it), it can handle video over 802.11b -- even MPEG2 stuff sometimes-- because it does heavy data buffering at the client and server...

    20. Re:Fast enough? by afidel · · Score: 2

      So what if the Linksys Wap11 sucks. That doesn't mean the tech is crap. In fact I use Cisco gear at home and get 6.5-6.8 Mbps with large transfers via ftp. Average rate is in fact what is important because if you put a couple of megs of ram in buffer space then all you have to do is keep the average bandwidth up high enough to keep the stream going and not have dropouts so long that the cache clears.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    21. Re:Fast enough? by jmelamed · · Score: 1

      Which is why the IEEE is working on ratifying 802.11g, which has about the same range (and crappy power consumption) as .11b, but can carry something like 55M/s.

      Yeah baby! Wires are for losers!

    22. Re:Fast enough? by jovlinger · · Score: 2

      My linksys AP (befw11s4 v2, precisely) has trouble sustaining more than 350Kbs over just a few feet. Which is ok, because I tend to only use it to stream mp3s, but still is but a pale shadow over the paper spec.

      I get 100% signal strength. Rebooting the AP will often solve the problem (getting me ~200KBs) temporarily. Rebooting is sometimes necessary just to get it to let my laptop associate. I suspect many of the cheapo APs are just shite, and you really can't expect $50 unit to actually live up to it's specs.

      I'd appreciate feedback from others with expecience with both the Linksys and the Netgear, as I've always had good luck with netgear (with the notable exception of the 311 100bT card)

    23. Re:Fast enough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends on the resolution/bitrate of the DiVX one wants to play. The Dreamcast (200Mhz) can play low resolution (320x240) DiVX files, for example.

  5. Maybe I've overlooked something... by CommieLib · · Score: 5, Informative

    But how does this relate to PVR? Allowing my DVD player to access PC content doesn't allow me to PVR, as far as I can tell. The article mentioned plans to network to Replay TV, but that's not what you're saying here.

    Did I miss something?

    --
    If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
    1. Re:Maybe I've overlooked something... by wachusett · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That was my first reaction; I thought I'd misread something.

      But maybe what they're suggesting is that if you use your PC (with a tuner card) to record digital content, and then can access that through your DVD player. Which effectively lets you use your PC as a PVR, without the hassle of burning DVDs or VCDs to play on your DVD player. You can also download or trade shows over the internet with your PC.

      That'd be cool.

    2. Re:Maybe I've overlooked something... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      See http://www.mythtv.org and all will become clear.

      I've been considering buying one of Via's mini-itx mobo's to use as a thin client with MythTV. With case they run just under $200.00 but start adding RAM (pc133) and a DVD player, and the cost goes up to about this price range. If I could use this to display video captured on my central server, I'll be a happy camper.

    3. Re:Maybe I've overlooked something... by Anonym0us+Cow+Herd · · Score: 1

      SonicBlue announces a new DVD player that can use either 802.11b or Ethernet to access whatever the slashdot editors are smoking today. (And yesterday!)

      --
      The price of freedom is eternal litigation.
    4. Re:Maybe I've overlooked something... by guacamolefoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      John:

      Just post under your normal user name. There's nothing wrong with pimping your own project. No need to AC-post.

      GF.

    5. Re:Maybe I've overlooked something... by rsborg · · Score: 2
      But maybe what they're suggesting is that if you use your PC (with a tuner card) to record digital content, and then can access that through your DVD player.

      Yeah, I think have overlooked something. Like if you have a PC-based PVR, you probably can output the signal directly to the TV anyway.

      You can also download or trade shows over the internet with your PC.

      Ok, like you can't do this already with a PC-PVR.

      That'd be cool.

      No, other than the wireless connetion, it's rather useless.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  6. Is it worth the $$? by goldspider · · Score: 2
    "The player is aggressively priced at about $250 US and is due out in first quarter 2003."

    Or you could just buy a DVD player for $50 at WalMart. Is the geek-factor really worth the additional $200?

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:Is it worth the $$? by birder · · Score: 2

      It's more a replacement for a DVD burner.The idea is to stream your pirated DivX movies from your PC to your televsion.

    2. Re:Is it worth the $$? by mark_lybarger · · Score: 2

      that's why i pirate all my DVD's to VCD (mpeg2?) format so I CAN watch them in my dvd player or on the pc. divx was nice until i found a much older technology laying around that provided more flexability.

    3. Re:Is it worth the $$? by PunchMonkey · · Score: 2


      Or you could just buy a DVD player for $50 at WalMart. Is the geek-factor really worth the additional $200
      --
      Is modding down ACs "offtopic" really a worthwhile use of your points?


      No but modding down people who didn't read the article probably is :-)

      The DVD player is a regular dvd player which also has an 802.11b interface to access your network with in order to play music, videos and show pictures.

      Also, the /. post is pretty misleading, leading you to believe this has something to do with PVR, which it doesn't (except a possible interface to a ReplayTV unit in the future).

      --
      I'll have something intelligent to add one of these days...
    4. Re:Is it worth the $$? by goldspider · · Score: 2
      Oh I read the article... and I still couldn't find anything to justify paying $250 for this. I mean, was there really that much demand for such a device?

      I would even go so far as to suggest that the people this is marketed towards prefer using their computers for their multimedia needs... something that they can already do without having to spend $250 for what only amounts to a neat gadget.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    5. Re:Is it worth the $$? by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      VCD is MPEG1, SVCD is MPEG2. VCDs hold an hour, and SVCDs can vary but are usually around forty minutes... long enough for a TV show with the commercials cut out. DVD is MPEG2 as well, but since the disks hold 4 gigs (single layer/ double layer stuff applies that I'm not going to go into), they can have a much longer, higher quality stream.

      Satellites also bounce TV shows to the affilitate stations using MPEG2. AFAIK, that's why the format was originally developed. MP3s are the third "layer" from the MPEG2 standard - the audio layer.

      Correct at will, I'm sure about the beginning, and have picked up the second paragraph from here and there.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    6. Re:Is it worth the $$? by FleshWound · · Score: 2
      No but modding down people who didn't read the article probably is :-)

      The DVD player is a regular dvd player which also has an 802.11b interface to access your network with in order to play music, videos and show pictures.
      You have no idea how tempting it was to mod you down for not reading the article ;)

      The device comes bundled with a standard Ehternet port. The 802.11b access is extra. =)
    7. Re:Is it worth the $$? by PunchMonkey · · Score: 2

      LOL, yeah, I realized that after. I hope someone mods us both down ;-)

      -- Mike

      --
      I'll have something intelligent to add one of these days...
  7. Dude, that was my business plan by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

    Too bad I never got around to actually do anything.

    Check out Rubik by Mosaik. Oh so lush.
    --
    How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
  8. Ethernet, 802.11b add-on by crow · · Score: 5, Informative

    The posting is misleading. The item comes with an ethernet port, but support for 802.11b will require an additional piece of hardware. I'm not clear from the information available if it will just use a PCMCIA slot or something else.

    1. Re:Ethernet, 802.11b add-on by stevel · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's even more misleading than it first appears - the article discusses a DVD player that allows display of content from your networked PC. The only reference to PVRs is a mention that ReplayTV boxes from the same company also offer network connectivity. There's nothing PVR-related in this announcement at all.

      Don't people actually read the articles they point to before posting here?

    2. Re:Ethernet, 802.11b add-on by ThrasherTT · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Some (all?) of the editors don't even read the front page before posting news... how can they be expected to read the article?

      --

      All Your Memory Are Belong To Java
    3. Re:Ethernet, 802.11b add-on by crow · · Score: 1

      The PVR connection is the idea of the poster, not the article. The person who submitted the story thought that one good application of this device is as a display slave for a home-brew PVR on your PC in another room. I've been following the ReplayTV discussion at another site, and people are excited about using these as remote display tools for both their PCs and their their PVRs.

    4. Re:Ethernet, 802.11b add-on by brandorf · · Score: 1

      To be honest, it does not seem to be any different from the software kit availiable for the PS2 that allows you to play files from a host computer once you have the network adaptor.

      --


      Bork Bork Bork!!
    5. Re:Ethernet, 802.11b add-on by spideyct · · Score: 1

      Are you sure about this? Thats what I thought when I first read the article, but I think the article may be just as misleading:

      "In addition to playing DVD movies, the new player will be able to access content on PCs, such as photos, music and videos, via a wireless network connection."

      That statement leads you to believe the DVD player has built-in wireless.

      "Sonicblue's DVD player will be able to connect to networks via an Ethernet connection. Consumers will be able to purchase 802.11b PC cards to connect the player to a PC using wireless networking."

      That statment leads you to believe the DVD player requires an add-on for the wireless capability.

      But maybe not. Maybe this paragraph was trying to say was users will need to "...purchase 802.11b PC cards [for their PC] to connect the player to a PC using wireless networking."

      So it really could go either way. We'd need another source to know for sure if the wireless is built in.

    6. Re:Ethernet, 802.11b add-on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article is confusing. I think it says it comes with a PCMCIA slot, not a port.

      If they had a clue, it would be both a PCMCIA slot and an ethernet port. That way, folks could use a bridge or card directly for HPNA 2, powerline networking, the 5 ghz cards wireless cards (802.11g I think, I always forget), or just plain network the DVD player to the network directly.

      If it's a proprietary PCMCIA slot or you need specialized, restricted drivers, this thing will be dead from the get go. I would shell out $250 for the player if I could choose, within reason, the way it was networked. But no way in hell I would pay $250 then dish out another $100 for a proprietary card to get the wireless feature.

    7. Re:Ethernet, 802.11b add-on by sysadmn · · Score: 2

      As the poster, I'd like to point out I did read the article. The PVR comment comes from the fact that I know of at least 4 OSS PVR suites under development, and 2-3 Windows commercial effort. If you're not smart enough to look at a PC and say, "You could make a PVR out of that", why are you reading Slashdot?

      --
      Envy my 5 digit Slashdot User ID!
    8. Re:Ethernet, 802.11b add-on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a PCMCIA interface but only cards with certain chipsets will be supported.

  9. I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    if it could access my favorite websites like Slashdot and theBubbler.

    Now that would make it worth while investing in.

    1. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, theBubbler is loaded with a ton of crap. If you could put some slashdot type form into theBubbler it would be one awesome site.

    2. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      theBubbler isnt a tech site, or a geek site, so I think that bloggs would be better on this type of site. Also, it's completely based on Wisconsin and related Wisconsin info/direcories. None the less, it's still an awesome site

  10. So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Instead, why not just spend $50 bucks and do this on your Playstation 2?

    Q Cast Player

    This thing rocks, by the way.

    1. Re:So what? by ThrasherTT · · Score: 1

      Holy crap. Is this thing a PVR too? It seems to say something about TV capture on the site, but it isn't clear (which means it probably doesn't). Otherwise, it looks really damn cool.

      --

      All Your Memory Are Belong To Java
    2. Re:So what? by aborchers · · Score: 2

      My reading is that it does not. It just plays what's already on your PC. It would have to have a TV Tuner or other A/V in to record, but they say nothing about such interfaces or capabilities.

      I was contemplating building a separate PVR node for my LAN that would live in the entertainment center and store to the "server" in my office, but this is looking like a pretty sweet option. $100 for the tuner and PS2 NIC + no extra hardware in my E.C. = quite elegant! Of course, my server box already has an AIW RADEON, so it can handle the recording functions that this lacks. It just couldn't (till now) play them on my main TV...

      --
      Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    3. Re:So what? by freeweed · · Score: 2

      You can buy Playstation 2's for $50 now? Network ready?

      Sign me up!

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    4. Re:So what? by lenroc · · Score: 1

      I was thinking of doing the same thing, except I don't have a TV Tuner card for my PC yet so it would cost me a bit more to get started. The only thing I'm not sure about is how elegantly the BroadQ software would be able to access my saved TV shows. If I had to interact with my PC at all to get the PS2 to be able to access my saved shows, it would be too much of a hassle to be worth it. But if I could set it up, for example, to save the TV shows to a folder that the QCast scans automatically, that would be good! On a side note - What are some good TV Tuner cards, and PVR software options for the PC?

    5. Re:So what? by aborchers · · Score: 2

      I couldn't turn up a lot of technical details on their site about how it connects to the repository on the server. If I were building it, I would have implemented it as OS-appropriate file-sharing a'la SMB, NFS, etc that wouldn't require any additional software on the PC. I get the impression from the way their site is worded that you do have to install something of theirs on the server machine. Maybe someone who owns one or has been more successful turning up technical details can add a clue?

      As far as TV cards go, I have only owned 2: an old Pinnacle Systems and an ATI All in Wonder RADEON 32. I have been very happy with the ATI card and the (Windows) software that came with it. It works well under Windows and Linux (limited experience on that topic, though) and has tons of multimedia I/O. The only thing noticably missing being a coax cable out. Of course, I only notice this because my current TV is a dinosaur without S-video or RCA inputs! :-) The Pinnacle card was less impressive, but the cost and feature difference between them was substantial.

      As for PVR software, if you are a tinkerer you will probably do best w/ Linux as the platform because a lot of people are currently working on PVR projects for that OS. I can't recommend any particular packages, but Google should be able to help. Windows options are probably going to be more limited because I think most of the stuff available is custom to the card it ships with. I haven't seen a lot of off the shelf, general purpose PVR software, but then again, I haven't really looked for it either...

      Cheers!

      --
      Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    6. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you do have to install a Java application on your PC. You then mark folders as "shared" so the PS2 can have access to their content.

    7. Re:So what? by briandoc · · Score: 1

      it seems they do have a PVR solution in the works too, but requires an additional piece of software/hardware to work with the qcast. [ http://www.snapstream.com/broadq/info.htm ] $50 for software only if you have a tuner card, or $89 includes a pci tuner card, or $135 includes a usb tuner solution... supposed to add tivo-like functions to the qcast setup when the final product comes out... i guess you can buy it now and when the qcast version is available, it's a free upgrade...

    8. Re:So what? by codingOgre · · Score: 1

      Because the Qcast sucks for playing DIVX movies. I know I have it. The software is getting close, but when I have my Mom over for a visit I can't use "close". The mp3 playback is cool, except when you have more than a few hundred songs in a directory. (just hangs). The final touch is the sweet feature of the CD booting every 3rd or 4th try. Please explain to me how this thing "rocks". THE QCAST IS NOT READY FOR PRIMETIME!

      --
      Space may be the final frontier, but it's made in a Hollywood basement. --Red Hot Chili Peppers, Californication
    9. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      seems to always work okay with me!

      try deleting your qcast save from the memory card browser (in the ps2 not in qcast) and re-setup your network. It will reboot 4 or 5 times to update to the new versions, and may work better.

      I have directories with 500 and 600 songs in them, and its just fine!

    10. Re:So what? by codingOgre · · Score: 1

      try deleting your qcast save from the memory card browser (in the ps2 not in qcast) and re-setup your network. It will reboot 4 or 5 times to update to the new versions, and may work better.

      I have already done that.

      I have directories with 500 and 600 songs in them, and its just fine!

      I have a directory with 4200+. The workaround I have found is to generate my own playlists with "ls" and "awk" and redirect them into the Default_Playlists directory.

      --
      Space may be the final frontier, but it's made in a Hollywood basement. --Red Hot Chili Peppers, Californication
  11. Free movies! by JasonMaggini · · Score: 4, Funny

    All you have to do is make a Pringles-can antenna and drive around for a while...

    1. Re:Free movies! by aero6dof · · Score: 5, Funny

      And I thought drive-in movie theatres were dying off!

  12. XVID by aivic · · Score: 0

    Niceeeee... Watching XVID's is never been easier with this genius of an invention

  13. Re:Is This Story For Real? by 91degrees · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "CD: It seems that I might have fallen for a hoax. Doh!"

    Right there, after the text. I think that may be a correction.

  14. Perfect... by cybermace5 · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is wonderful. Now, in addition to DDOS attacks and hacking by the RIAA, we can have wardriving by the MPAA!

    --
    ...
  15. Cool idea, but... by Mephie · · Score: 1
    That's a pretty cool idea, but especially for (downloaded) movies and the like, wouldn't image scaling be a bit of an issue? Blowing a 640x480 (or often much smaller) picture to fit on even, say, a 27" TV seems like it'd make the image awfully grainy.

    Also, wouldn't it be theoretically possible to take over someone else's DVD player if they don't set up decent security? Definitely interesting idea, but it's sure to have its issues.

    1. Re:Cool idea, but... by chaidawg · · Score: 1

      I could be wrong, but I think the native resolution of a standard television is 640x480. It is only on HDTV that you begin to get resolutions similar to computer monitors

    2. Re:Cool idea, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On a normal 27" TV (I don't know much about HDTV), the resolution is rather low compared to a computer monitor. What you're normally seeing is about the equivalent of 640x480. At least I know it's low, someone with more knowledge of NTSC can give you better figures.

    3. Re:Cool idea, but... by CaptMonkeyDLuffy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, any image with a resolution higher than 640x480 would be wasted on most TV's... I forgot the exact resolution that a standard TV signal is, but it is approximately 640x480(in addition to being only 30hz interlaced...) Now, the more recent HDTV's and such are a different story, one I'm not very familiar with... but your standard TV wouldn't need any improvement to the image provided to it.

    4. Re:Cool idea, but... by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      512x384 interlaced on an NTSC set, 720x? PAL (cant think of it right now).

      VCD and SVCD are both well below that resolution and look fine.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  16. "full details" - not by jridley · · Score: 1, Redundant

    It just says you can "access media" from your PC. No word on what it supports. MPG-1, certainly. WMV, maybe. DivX3, almost certainly not. OGM/XviD, again, probably not.

    Also, thankfully the default is ethernet, 802.11 is an option (that I'm not interested in - too slow)

    I'm still going to build a PC for my entertainment center - then I can play what I want including FUTURE formats.

    1. Re:"full details" - not by bigdady92 · · Score: 1

      but will it do gigabit ethernet...streaming pr0n at the speed of fibre..

      --
      Wheel of Time: Book by Book and Sumview (summary review) Bigdady92 style: http://bigdady92.blogspot.com/
  17. This can't be for a DVD-R... by twofidyKidd · · Score: 0

    Could it? That's pretty damn cheap for a Wi-Fi enabled burner. Because if it's not a burner, than what the hell does this have to do with a PVR...

    --


    Hades, PoD: Official Advocate
  18. Illegal? by ottffssent · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I could have sworn it was illegal (or at least against some shrinkwrap EULA mumbo-jumbo) to play a DVD over any sort of wireless link. It came up during Microsoft's massively ill-conceived tablet PC thing, I believe.

    1. Re:Illegal? by lynx_user_abroad · · Score: 1
      PacketVideo claims to own a patent to video over wireless. Perhaps that's what you're thinking of?

      --

      The thing about things we don't know is we often don't know we don't know them.

    2. Re:Illegal? by afidel · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not illegal, more against the liscense from the DVD Forum that companies have to sign to get a valid CSS decryption key. There are technologies that the DVD Forum does not think can be properly secured so they do not want content going across them. Besides this is for reading data off a pc through the DVD player to the TV, not for transfering the DVD data to the PC. This thing is basically a DVD player with a network jack that allows the same kind of multimedia features as some of the current players that can play SVCD's, mp3 cd's and have CF and MMC readers so they can display jpegs from your digital camera. Basically an all in one media center that uses the tv for a display. Since my pc is already in the living room and hooked up to the S-Video port on the tv this does nothing for me personally but some people don't have the pc in the living room and want to keep it that way so this would allow them to access all that stuff off the pc upstairs (with a 802.11b wireless bridge attached to the network port I would assume).

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  19. Consumer Electronics vs PC by sheddd · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Is really what's going on here. I saw lots've guys at comdex showing off new DVD players / etc that do new things. They seem to think that the average shmo will want to use their remote control rather than learning how to do the equivalent with their PC.

    I think they're dead wrong; look at the device this article mentions.

    "The Go-Video D2730 player's software will let consumers view content on their television that's stored on their PC using a remote control for navigation. The customer will be able to stream music files and other content on the DVD player. "

    Hmm, what protocol does it use for filesharing? Netbios on a WiFi network? Will it play my ogg files? My DivX? My png photos? You can put together a shuttle SV-24 with a dvd player and a 6 channel sound card for about the same price they're quoting; that's what I use at home and I'm quite happy with it (except for the fact my TV won't do more than 640x480). If I were a gambling man, I'd sell sonicblue's stock short and profit from their stupidity.

    1. Re:Consumer Electronics vs PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, here's the only problem. Walk up to random person on the street, and if they're not a techie themselves (and yes, non-techies *do* exist!), ask them about protocols for filesharing, or Netbios on a WiFi network. Ask them if they know what Ogg is, or what a PNG is. Ask them if they care.

      Most people don't really give a damn about protocols or filetypes as long as they can plug it in and play. They're happy with plain old JPGs and MP3s, because they work and they don't have to think about it. That's why they'll buy this player.

    2. Re:Consumer Electronics vs PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Hello. Earth to slashdot crowd. 99% of the public doesn't use "ogg" files. 99% of the public is never going to use "ogg" files. Don't expect product manufacturers to care all that much. NOT VALID CRITICISM.

    3. Re:Consumer Electronics vs PC by Nerftoe · · Score: 1

      I'd sell sonicblue's stock short and profit from their stupidity.

      Unless the rules have changed, you cannot short a stock once it falls below $5. Since Sonicblue is trading at around 55 cents, shorting would probably be impossible.

    4. Re:Consumer Electronics vs PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They seem to think that the average shmo will want to use their remote control rather than learning how to do the equivalent with their PC.

      And they're right.

  20. TV-out card? by phorm · · Score: 2

    Most video cards with TV-out are cheaper than this. GF4 for example - via S-video, with optional conversion to RCA-style connector, and a booster to bypass Macrovision issues if connected to a VCR (or in my case, an old BETA machine). Combined with a PC DVD-ROM and you can play everything just fine.

    Granted, wireless is pretty cool, but this seems to be not-entirely-useful in a comparative aspect... unless your computer is beyond TV proximity.

    Nice thing about computers though - people may biatch about the cost, the the addons sometimes replace home electronics more cheaply. PC DVD-ROM's were a helluva lot cheaper than console ones for a loooong time, and you can play around with them more.

    1. Re:TV-out card? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unless your computer is beyond TV proximity

      Ya.. Generally that's the case.

    2. Re:TV-out card? by rirugrat · · Score: 1
      unless your computer is beyond TV proximity.

      Anyone want to price out how much a 40 foot long S-Video cable will cost me!?

      Chris

    3. Re:TV-out card? by dynamiteweb · · Score: 1

      I hate promoting a company that is one of the largest perpetrators of pop-ups, but X10.com has a really cool product that my friend uses.

      http://www.x10.com/products/x10_vk53a.htm

      It sends the video from your PC to your VCR, TV, or whatever - wireless. Very cool, and alot cheaper than the product in the article. It even has a nifty "mouse" - takes some getting used to, but it's great for us lazy remote-punching couch potatoes.

      I know what is going on my (late) Christmas list!

    4. Re:TV-out card? by squeegee_boy · · Score: 2, Informative

      $11.30USD, from a place I frequent:

      http://www.rpelectronics.com/English/Content/Ite ms /212-650.asp

  21. What does this have to do w/ a DVD player? by UnixFerEver · · Score: 1

    Its nice, I guess, but the PC connectivity features don't seem to leverage off the DVD player at all. The only connection I see is that a DVD player is something that you are going to want in your home theater anyway, so at least you don't need another box in your system.

  22. Blame your neighbor. by jdludlow · · Score: 5, Funny

    But honey, I swear that the DVD player just started pumping out pron on its own!

  23. integration by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 2

    This certainly isn't the first integration of PC and TV in a consumer product. I own a SliMP3 and the Qcast Tuner software for PS2.

    I wonder how long it will be before these types of devices which play media files from your PC onto your TV/stereo system are considered "mainstream".?

    I think that the more of these enabling (sorry to use that cheesy buzword) media technologies there are, the better. I doubt however that the MPAA and RIAA share that view. They're bound to step in with heavy handed tactics sooner or later. Just look at how they responded to DeCSS - software which allows consumers to watch DVD's on platforms that they do not control. Seems like this is right up their litigation alley.

    Just my two cents.

    --
    I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
  24. not integrated 802.11b by asv108 · · Score: 4, Informative
    From the Article

    Sonicblue's DVD player will be able to connect to networks via an Ethernet connection. Consumers will be able to purchase 802.11b PC cards to connect the player to a PC using wireless networking

    1. Re:not integrated 802.11b by bigdady92 · · Score: 1

      waste...use 802.11a in Turbo/Hyper/Super mode (72mb/s) and THEN we can talk about GOOD streaming DVD material...I can watch a full screen DIVX movie with my 802.11a WAP easier than i can with 802.11b and with less choppy interference. I love being able to sit on the crapper with my laptop and watch a full blown movie while my servers are grabbing some Kazaa goodness..

      --
      Wheel of Time: Book by Book and Sumview (summary review) Bigdady92 style: http://bigdady92.blogspot.com/
    2. Re:not integrated 802.11b by 4/3PI*R^3 · · Score: 2

      which translates into "Sonic Blue will find the cheapest no-name Taiwanese made 802.11b card, place a proprietary adapter on it and charge you $200 bucks additional!!!"

  25. Here's why you want to DIY instead of BUY by 4/3PI*R^3 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    From the Sonic Blue web page:
    SONICblue reserves the right to automatically add, modify, or disable any features in the operating software when your ReplayTV 5000 connects to our server.

    Translated:
    We will sell you this box with a list of features you want but once the *AA gets congress to pass favorable laws, wins a court battle, or becomes a major shareholder in our business we will promptly castrate your box without sending you one penny in refund.

  26. Full PAL is 720x576 by DrSkwid · · Score: 2

    interlaced

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  27. And the ps2 network adapter... by WestieDog · · Score: 1

    You forgot to mention that you need to buy the 'official' ps2 ethernet adapter also. It wouldn't be a big deal but originally Qcast said that you could use a usb adaptor. I allready have a usb nic for ps2's madden 2003 and it works great. I refuse to replace it just because Qcast is too cheap to buy the development kit!

  28. 802.11b too slow by MentlFlos · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Ok, now put your calculators away here... I'm going to talk about how things look like and how they feel, not if a link can mathmaticly support bitrate X.

    I've found that trying to stream anything worthwild over a .11b link is just too iffy. I often stream video files from my server to whereever I am sitting with the laptop. With the netgear card reporting a full speed connect at ~60% signal strength and 100% quality it is kind-of jerky at times. I know I'm pushing the limits of what that little wireless connect can do.

    Now I can deal with it for now because I'm not expecting it to perform perfectly. However, what is going to happen when Joe Consumer picks one of these up, hooks in the wireless part and tries to stream his DVD rip collection and it gets .3FPS?

    Answer: You get one very unhappy Joe Consumer.

    I believe that people will expect this thing to do more then it can, and I doubt that sonic will be up front and tell people about this limitation.

    Makes me think of a car dealer trying to sell a car for use on interstate highways but the car can only go 45MPH. Sure it works, but it isn't quite what you expected now is it?

    1. Re:802.11b too slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never had any problems with MPEG, AVI, DIVX. This is with remote desktop and file transfers going and 3 devices on the wireless network. Maybe you run your microwave too much?

    2. Re:802.11b too slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when does joe consumer have a DVD rip collection???????

    3. Re:802.11b too slow by MentlFlos · · Score: 1

      This is based on the assumption that Joe Consumer has enough brains to use Kazaa. I never said that Joe ripped his own DVDs.

    4. Re:802.11b too slow by really? · · Score: 1

      Since th device does not seem to come with a wireless card, later SonicBlue will "suggest" that JC - not the Bible one - buy a "802.11.a" card??? Problem solved. No?

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    5. Re:802.11b too slow by MentlFlos · · Score: 1

      Quite true. I have yet to play with .11a yet. I got a dual band card so I can up grade my access point someday, but I have yet to get the money to do it :)

  29. Sonicblue jumps the gun again by asv108 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sonicblue has a history of trying to add cool features to unrefined products. The title is misleading since 802.11b requires an additional purchase. Last month I decided to get a PVR. Sonicblue's replay tv 5000 had some real cool features, but the interface sucked. Interface is extremly important in consumer applications such as a cell phone or PVR. I ended up getting a tivo after i learned that you can use usb ethernet adaptors with the series 2. Anyway, my point is sonicblue has a history of sticking some cool features in a completely unrefined product.

  30. WAR viewing here I come by 4/3PI*R^3 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Who wants to bet the SSID will be hard coded and it probably won't support WEP (and if it does support WEP the key will be hard coded) beceause most l^Husers won't be able to figure out how to make this work.

    So all I need is a laptop with an 802.11b card and a couple of people in my neigborhood with HBO and an penchant for "The Sopranos"!!!!

  31. Rendesvous? by snitty · · Score: 1

    Hopefully this has ZeroConf or it could be added. Imagine having an 802.11 DVD player, seamlessly networked with your Panasonic Plasma TV.

    It really seams like we are going to see a revolution in networked aplicances, finally, and it dosen't look like bluetooth is going to be the springboard.

    So far, if I recall, Panasonic and at least 2 other companies have jumped onto the ZeroConf bandwagon. This includes some stero equipment along with TVs from Panasonic which support slide shows sent from the TV.

    Are you excited?

    --
    Modular Redundancy--Because 4 out of 5 Nodes agree
  32. This is in no way a PVR... by xchino · · Score: 2

    If it was a dvd writer that would be different, but remember the "R" in PVR stands for Recorder, not player. I think this would be a great idea for a DVD-R, and I'd snatch it up! Unfotunately it's not, it's not even that useful as is. 11 Mb/s is awfully slow to be streaming video, but the ethernet could be an option. However, if you were going to go that route (ie running wires), it'd still be cheaper and more effective just to buy a Tuner card and send whatever to your TV via Composite or Svideo.

    I think this product relies more on it's "cool" factor than it's usability. DVD Player competition is tight, and they seem to be really reaching for new features. Next I'm sure we'll start seeing dvd in Custom translucent color cases, or come with Madonna's signature for an extra $50..

    --
    Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.
    1. Re:This is in no way a PVR... by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 2

      However, if you were going to go that route (ie running wires), it'd still be cheaper and more effective just to buy a Tuner card and send whatever to your TV via Composite or Svideo.

      One problem with running composite video cables, distance. I was looking at doing something like this a while back. I have a GForce4, with the TV-Out port. And I was thinking that if I would do a cable run from my computer room to the TV, I could call up the movie files on my PC and watch them on the TV. I did a rough guesstemate on the distance, and figureed that for a proper run (up the wall, across the attic, and back down the wall next to the TV) I would need between 150 to 200 feet. Probably towards the 200 end just to have some slack, and to provide for extra cable in case the cats chewed on one of the ends. Of course, knowing that distance can be a killer in networking, I assumed that video signals might have a problem in that area too. After some research, I discovered that anything over 30' for a composite signal was pushing it. There were some really nice low impedence cables for sale that were 100' but the prices were astonomical. In the end I just let the idea go.
      Now, with this sort of box comming out, I have hope for the project once again, though its still not quite what I would want. This type of thing would be great if they would integrate a record function with it. I imagine that we will eventually see a set-top box capable of playing media off a PC, though a network connection (doesn't need to be wireless, I don't mind doing a CAT-5 run) and being able to turn around and record a show directly to your PC, again through a network link.

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
  33. DVD quality throughput? by beest · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From tests I've done in the past with DVD quality streaming, wireless networks such as 802.11b can not support the throughput required. I've had DVD's max out at 13 MB/s. 802.11b can only send 11 Mb/s not including overhead which is greater than 802.3 in the first place...

    1. Re:DVD quality throughput? by SectoidRandom · · Score: 2

      Did you read the article?

      It wasn't designed to display dvd's played from your dvd set-top on your pc, but to play music / video files FROM your pc on your DVD/TV. Now if you store multiple mpeg2 streams at greater than 11Mb/s on your HD then well i guess you will have to deal with the CAT5 connection instead of the wifi (option).

    2. Re:DVD quality throughput? by unsung · · Score: 1

      Sort of makes you wonder if HDTV quality content will ever come into play. I wonder what is the throughput for *that* resolution.

  34. Got a PS2? by JayDiggity · · Score: 1

    This little doo-dad doesn't actually sound like it's a PVR - streaming content off your computer is great, but it never says anything about getting TV onto your hard drive.

    If you already have a PlayStation2 (that doubles as a DVD player), why spend $250 on more hardware when you can use this: QCast Tuner? It'll record TV onto your computer's hard drive and pull media off of it, too. All you need is the Sony Network Adapter... wireless network option is up to you.

    No, I don't work for BroadQ, but I do own it and it's a great product. Who needs to spend more cash on extra hardware?

  35. This is really stupid. by NineNine · · Score: 1

    In addition with using wi-fi, which the vast majority of average people still don't have on their PC's, this thing isn't practical. Most people have DVD's on... surprise DVD's! This means, you want to put in a movie? Go to the computer, boot it up, put the DVD in, and walk back to the living room. The only people who'd like this would be uber-geeks with money to blow on huge hard drives to store movies, broadband to download those movies (since most people don't rip DVD's onto hard drives, and the few who do are pretty stupid), and wi-fi in the computer. I predict this product will sell... to about 100 people. In fact, if it even actually hits the shelves, I nominate this product for The Biggest Flop of the Year.

    1. Re:This is really stupid. by rainwalker · · Score: 2

      You didn't read the press release, did you? Yes, the article submission is misleading, but what this is is a DVD player with networking capabilities, so that it can not only play content from DVD's, but also from computers on your network. Pretty useful, actually. This means I don't need to put another computer in the living room in order to play my DivX movies or mp3's. Also note that it does not come with wi-fi installed; rather, it has a PCMCIA slot with a notwork card in it, and you can buy an 802.11B PCMICA card to swap it with.

    2. Re:This is really stupid. by HamNRye · · Score: 2

      Glad I'm on your foes list...

      Clue to Nine... This is not for watching DVD's! Really. The DVD player does, guess what, plays DVD's. It can also hook to your PC to play MP3's, show JPG's, and possibly even DIVX files.

      "The only people who'd like this would be uber-geeks"
      No, the Uber-Geeks already have one. The Uber-Geeks build a computer to go with every TV so that they can do what this $250 consumer device can.

      "(since most people don't rip DVD's onto hard drives, and the few who do are pretty stupid), "
      Then who ripped all of the DVD's available on Gnutella?? Why is ripping a DVD to your HD a bad idea?? The same could be said for MP3's using your logic. "nobody rips CD's to their HDD, and those who do are stupid."

      I have Kids, Kids destroy DVD's. I rip my DVD's to the HDD and then burn them to SVCD. This alone has saved me two extra purchases of Snow White. Now when you figure that Disney DVD's only enjoy limited release, this also means that I can rip DVD's rented at Blockbuster, borrowed from a friend, etc... In many cases after the DVD/Video has ceased to be available. (And it also means that I would not have purchased Snow White again, We simply would not have that movie anymore. My daughter's favorite movie.)

      I also have recorded lick videos and teaching tapes. It is much easier to use them (as they are networked) split them up into individual licks, rewind and fast-forward, etc...

      Quite frankly, what other means do you have of backing up the content of a DVD?? Now, if you think back-ups are stupid, then I am simply arguing with a moron. Or perhaps you think Ceasar should get another 20 sheckles every time a DVD gets scratched, or a VCR eats a tape.

      The fact that you see no use for this product is a symptom of your limited imagination, not a failure to deliver a desirable feature. Had you read the article, it has ethernet (which most people do have on their PC's.) and wireless is an option.

      "money to blow on huge hard drives to store movies, broadband to download those movies"
      Yep, who could afford it?? This HDD would only store some 1,000 movies in DIVX format. For shame. That's after we leave room for WinXP. One would need the resources of a Bill Gates to have an IDE RAID of these...

      1,000 DVD @ $15ea. = $15,000

      Really though, I can't even think of 1,000 movies I'd like to keep. But I have all the Mr. Show, South Park, and Duckman episodes. Much of this simply is not available on DVD.

      As far as broadband, if you don't have it yet, please turn in your geek keys on the way out. I would keep Broadband just for the always on connection. Subtract the cost of a second phone line, etc...

      So, for the Joe who has his TV hooked to his stereo, and the crappy OEM Labtec speakers still on his PC, this might be a good product for him to listen to his MP3's on his stereo, show vacation snaps from his digital camera to his friends, or even show the AVI of his wedding on the TV.

      None of this requires Broadband or a Huge HDD. But most people unaccustomed to creating any thought or content of their own generally see devices like this as a tool for only enjoying others creative output.

      Again, read the article before you post. I'm not even sure that this thing will play a DVD across the network, why would you need that when the darn thing is a DVD player??

      ~Hammy

    3. Re:This is really stupid. by GooseKirk · · Score: 2

      most people don't rip DVD's onto hard drives, and the few who do are pretty stupid

      I dunno... I was just thinking about this the other day. Let's say an average DVD is 6 gigs and 20 bucks. You could fit 20 DVDs on a 120 gig drive. You'll spend probably $200 for the drive and rentals versus $400 for the DVDs. Throw compression into the mix, and the cost disparity goes through the roof. Throw in downloaded and homemade content, and there's plenty of reasons for wanting to access media stored on a hard drive from your TV.

      Granted, 120 gigs isn't much, but 320s are just around the corner, and who knows how far we'll be in another year or two.

      Storing movies on hard drives (or some other future large media) is the way to go, AFAIC. I'm sick of all this physical media. I'd much rather have a gigantic, portable, external hard drive that I can plug in anywhere and keep my whole media collection on than acres of shelf space for CDs and DVDs. Now, if only they'd build Firewire/USB2 jacks into car stereos and TVs, along with decent interfaces for accessing media drives, we'd be all set...

  36. What will it play? by Havokmon · · Score: 2
    Will it play my ogg files? My DivX? My png photos?

    Yeah, people are going to be pissed when they discover the tunes they so easily ripped from their CD's via WMP won't work through the SonicBlue DVD player because it doesn't have a license for them..

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  37. ReplayTV by crow · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I love my ReplayTV. There are two priority levels: Non-guaranteed and Guaranteed. If you guarantee a recording, it will reserve hard drive space for the show and it will record it. It won't let you set two guaranteed shows for the same timeslot. The only time you run into problems is when the network shifts the schedule slightly so that two shows overlap when they normally wouldn't.

    As to finding new shows, you can do a search fairly easily, and you can browse the guide. It's trivial to tell it to record something, and also trivial to change the settings on something already scheduled.

    What Replay lacks is a to-do list. So if you have a bunch of non-guaranteed things (like my wife's "Shakespeare" theme or my "Stargate" theme), it will pick the one to record using a fairly cryptic algorithm (which one starts first; which one is on a lower channel; which theme was create first).

  38. Great... by TerryAtWork · · Score: 2

    Now I can get my DVD player hacked by wise guys.

    --
    It's Christmas everyday with BitTorrent.
  39. Better plan by RealBeanDip · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually every "media" device in your house should have this capability. There should be such a thing as "storage" (i.e. hard drive) and everything from your video game console to your stereo to your video playback device and your computer should access it.

    Put the "consoles" in their proper perspective; computers will be great for surfing the net and ordering content. Your video playback console is great for playing back your videos, and your stereo console is great for playing back music.

    The point I'm making here is everything should be contected together, but accessed in with the console that makes sense. IMO, playing tunes and watching downloaded videos on a computer stinks. Playing video games on the TV rocks, but video game consoles with their own storage devices sucks.

    If 802.11b wireless is the link that ties all these together, great, but it should be seamless and painless to the user to set it up.

    Oh yeah, it needs to be secure too. ;)

    --

    You know you're a geek if you've ever replied to a tagline.

  40. Screw that by PD · · Score: 1

    If you want to access stuff on your PC, and you have a Playstation with ethernet adaptor, go to

    BroadQ

    It's software for your Playstation and your PC that lets you play movies and music on your entertainment system. All that stuff is stored on your PC.

    If you've got a Playstation, no need to go buy a separate box to do it.

  41. Definetely Illegal . . . . . by mofu · · Score: 1

    Read the FBI warning at the beginning of any commercial DVD.

    Strictly prohibits the rebroadcast of the contents.

    Then again maybe someone should add a pay-per-view video streaming service to their WiFi ISP service offerings. . . .

    1. Re:Definetely Illegal . . . . . by aborchers · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't believe this constitutes broadcast since it's "pull" technology. i.e. the DVD player pulls the files over the WLAN. Broadcast is sending out the signal so that anyone with appropriate hardware can intercept it.

      --
      Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    2. Re:Definetely Illegal . . . . . by Anonym1ty · · Score: 1

      Nope. 802.1 Can not be considered broadcast. It is point to point (or point to specific multi-points at best) communication.

      Broadcasting is BROAD and CASTING.... like throwing out a giant fishing net and scouping up every living thing in an area....

      802.1 can be encrypted. As soon as you do ANYTHING to limit the number of intended receivers, it is no longer broadcasting.

      As a matter of fact... even if others can receive it, if your intent is for the signal to only be received by one or a few persons it is not broadcasting.

      Just cause I talk to someone on my ham radio, doesn't mean I'm broadcasting... even if I can be heard by anyone with a scanner... Broadcasting and transmitting are two very different concepts

  42. Now with Ogg support . . . . by mofu · · Score: 1

    BroadQ now supports Ogg audio as well as MP3.
    Also plays most video: mpeg, avi, mov, divX . . . and has a picture viewer supporting jpg and png formats.

  43. News: They fit DVD players INSIDE the case! by NewAccount · · Score: 0

    Dude, you can actually buy a player or burner that will fit Inside your case! I got a tiny box with a mini-itx board with a DVD player from iDot Computers. Its half the size of the DVD player it replaces. I suppose I could use a wireless card with it, but why bother? It makes much more sense to put audio components (along with audio software) in PCs. Unfortunately Joe Average hasn't figured this out yet, but hopefully that will change soon.

  44. Press Release by NetShadow · · Score: 1
    SonicBlue's Press Release on this beast contains some interesting technical details.

    It seems that it supports standard ethernet out of the box, with 802.11 supported by swapping the ethernet PCMCIA card with an equivilent wireless PCMCIA card.

    It plays MPEG1 and MPEG2 video and MP3 and WMA audio over the network. (presumably via SMB fileshare) Not too bad for the price point ($249 MSRP). No mention of anything MPEG-4 based ala DivX/Xvid, so it's highly doubtful.

    For my money, I think I'll get a modded Xbox for roughly the same price and run Linux and mplayer or XBMP, which is based on the mplayer code anyway. I don't need 802.11 for this application. If I did, an ethernet to 802.11 wireless bridge (such as the Linksys WET11) would serve quite nicely.

    For the not-hackers out there, however, this isn't at all a bad deal, and a bunch of MPEG-2 (ala SVCD, or ripped DVD's) on today's large hard drives, combined with multiple cheap "media terminals" like this one, plugged into your TV's / Home Theatre, is a decent solution. Consider that network mp3 stereo components are going for about this price already, and you get the ability to archive and play your DVDs across your network, too, for the same price.

    Not too shabby.

    --
    NetShadow
  45. Get QCast for PlayStation 2 instead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This SonicBleu box will not play DivX -- at least, according to the news.com article. It will only play MPEG1 and 2 (for video) and WMA and MP3 (for audio).

    That means that to play back MPEG2, you're really going to be talking about 320x240 or 480x480 (SVCD) res. only... 640x480 will be too big to fit in WiFi.

    Of course, from the news.com article it's clear that WiFi is an OPTION, not default-- default is 10/100 Ethernet.

    All of this is interesting, but if you have a PlayStation 2, you would be much better off buying QCast from BroadQ -- www.broadq.com -- which allows your PS2 to pull OGG, MP3, JPG, MPG1/2/4, DivX 3, 4, and 5 and more off your PC...

    That, and it will be able to do progressive output, HD resolution (with component cabling), and is future-proof (software upgradable)...

    Oh, and it's $49.95 -- if you have a PS2 and a Network Adapter, and the PS2 already plays DVD's!!!!

    Not to mention the obvious... you can play games on your PS2!!!

    I have this software, and it rocks. Why it's not covered on /. or elsewhere is totally beyond me...

  46. what I really need by PW2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    What I really need is a DVD player that can stream data to my wireless computers. It would be nice to be able to continue watching a movie on my PDA when I need to take a bathroom break (slightly lower quality video would be ok)

    1. Re:what I really need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude you know, get a fucking life. pause the damn movie... why in hell would you need or want to watch a dvd on a pda in your own bathroom.

      or mabey you got some bladder problem and your average shit taks 30 minutes.

  47. NTSC, PAL, and DVD by i_am_nitrogen · · Score: 2

    NTSC has 525 scanlines (vertical), 25 of which are during the vertical blanking interleave, and the horizontal resolution isn't really defined. PAL has 625 scanlines. Both standards interlace scanlines. Since NTSC is an analog standard, the horizontal resolution doesn't need to be defined, and televisions and broadcasters can vary the signal as fast as they want to to add more horizontal resolution, as long as the equipment supports it. VCR's have an effective horizontal resolution somewhere below 320 pixels, though it doesn't look pixelated because it kind of smears the values (it's analog, and stored as a wave, not discrete pixels).

    DVD's are 352x240, 352x480, 704x480, or 720x480 in NTSC, x576 in PAL. I've never encountered an NTSC DVD that wasn't 720x480, and I'm not sure if players even support the other resolutions (someone please correct me if I got those resolutions wrong). 4:3 aspect ratio movies are typically displayed unscaled, with 720 pixels horizontal resolution in the analog signal (if it's a good decoder and NTSC signal generator), while 16:9 movies fields are typically shrunk vertically and reinterlaced. On an HDTV or projector with a DVD player that has built-in scaling or using a line quadroupler/deinterlacer, the resolution is scaled from 720x480 to whatever the HDTV or projector uses. Some projectors can sync at resolutions up to 3500x3500, though they cost tens of thousands of dollars.

  48. hmmm sounds like the cost of a ps2 + broadq by dougnaka · · Score: 1

    $200 for ps2 $50 for broadq's qcast tuner which plays DivX, mpg, ogg, mp3, jpg, etc.. and works great link doh! for got the $40 for the network adapter... so the broadq solution is a little bit more expensive, but playing games as well makes up for it..

    --
    My Linux Command of the Day site : LCOD
  49. did you know? by squarefish · · Score: 2

    Susan Kevorkian, an analyst with research firm IDC

    I hear she can get you a KILLER deal on one of these!

    --
    Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
  50. The xbox has a better solution by bbk · · Score: 2

    Check out the www.xboxmediaplayer.de . It does everything that Qcast does, and more - you can play homebrew games, emulators, etc. as well. It also supports more codecs (it uses the mplayer engine), and is updated regularly with new features and bugfixes.

    The total cost of a modchip for xbox is less than that of the ethernet adapter and Qcast for PS2.

    BBK

    1. Re:The xbox has a better solution by ThrasherTT · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but the total cost of an Xbox plus modchip > PS2 ethernet + Qcast... after all, Xbox costs $200 + 1 soul ;-)

      Seriously though, for PS2 owners and people that aren't into the modchip scene, Qcast looks quite nice.

      --

      All Your Memory Are Belong To Java
  51. Xbox + Linux + Mplayer by Nathan+Ramella · · Score: 1

    If you want a cheap set-top box for playing video, you can't go wrong with Xbox. I'd rather have a 100 meg link than 802.11b anyway. Streaming SVCDs gets choppy @ 11mbit.

    --
    http://www.remix.net/
  52. Why Wi-Fi? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2


    Your DVD player is in a fixed location in your house.

    Your home PC is in a fixed location in your house.

    I can't imagine why, other than the geekiness factor, wireless data transmission would be needed to have the DVD player and the PC communicate.

    I'd run 100BaseT between the two devices and get better data throughput for less money.

    1. Re:Why Wi-Fi? by adolf · · Score: 2

      Simple:

      Wireless is good so that you can watch porn straight from your neighbor's PC from the comfort of your couch, without all the hassle of maxing both cable connections, stringing Cat5, or even notifying him...

    2. Re:Why Wi-Fi? by outsider007 · · Score: 2

      I can't imagine why, other than the geekiness factor, wireless data transmission would be needed to have the DVD player and the PC communicate.

      well, there would be one less cord to trip over...

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    3. Re:Why Wi-Fi? by jvkjvk · · Score: 1

      I can't imagine why, other than the geekiness factor, wireless data transmission would be needed to have the DVD player and the PC communicate.

      I don't think there's a need to have a wireless connection, however, some people's houses are not yet fully wired - there's no fiber (or even CAT5) in the walls (the horror!).

      These people may 1) not want cables running all over the house or 2) not want to pay the money or time to install the wiring.

    4. Re:Why Wi-Fi? by Scyber · · Score: 1

      It has built in ethernet. The WiFi card is optional.

  53. Re:Is it worth the $$? (No) by frovingslosh · · Score: 2

    I agree, it's a nice idea, but hardly "agressively priced". I would much rather see them just stick a cheap 10/100 ethernet port on the back of the unit and not charge me for the wireless technology. Such a product (more agressively priced) would appeal to more users - those who want to direct connect to their network could; those who want to go wireless could use an external device.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  54. IN SOVIET RUSSIA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...we use mule to carry PC to living room.

  55. so let's see... by UserChrisCanter4 · · Score: 2

    for $250 I can buy a DVD player from a company that, admittedly, is not a huge consumer electronics corporation. And at $250, that DVD player is significantly more expensive than similarly specced (excluding the networking) players from companies like Sony, Toshiba, or Panasonic. It's only saving grace: the ability to play back video over a network.

    OR

    For $199 (after the two $50 rebates), I can get the 40 hour replay TV (granted, subscription required) which IS a PVR. Many of the name brand DVD players nowadays will support SVCD if you're dying to watch your MPEG-4/DiVX movies on your television. My other question: with as many different flavors of DiVX, and as many different takes on encoding the audio there-in (MP3, WMA, OGG, standard AC3), I don't really trust a hardware-based player to be able to handle any old DiVX file without some tinkering. Once I get to the point where I'm decompressing the audio and other similar exploits, I'm not as interested.

  56. Re:Fast enough? (My experience) by timeOday · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Exactly.

    However, I stream video from my desktop (with TV tuner card) to a laptop (with TV-out) under the TV over 802.11b. I do this by mounting an NFS volume over a VPN I establish from the laptop to the desktop. My datarate is set so 1 hr of video will just fit on a 700 MB CD (in case I see a show I want to keep). I'm also running an ad-hoc (rather than access point) network, if that makes any difference. The laptop and desktop are fairly close together, but there are a few walls.

    Under these conditions, I can just eek out enough bandwidth. There's more room for error if I stream over HTTP, but then I can't seek within the stream, so I stick with NFS.

    Very occasionally for no apparent reason I'm unable to use the player - interference from something, I assume.

  57. Re:This is Michael Sims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You did it to get the job? I thought that was the salary you negotiated for yourself.

  58. compare to media pcs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This seems like a complicated and awkward solution compared to the 'media center pc' initiatives based on Windows or Linux machine.

    I guess the selling point is that it's cheaper. This is certainly true compared to the expensive Windows-based media PCs, but I'm interested to see how much the Linux-based machines (I think Sony is working on this) will cost.

  59. Wireless DVD Good/Bad???... by Generic_SuperHero · · Score: 1

    Well, It's Sounds Good But It HAS to have some kind of password protection or encrriptiopn on the wireless network or it WILL become subject to "attack" and "misuse"... But The Idea Of It Is Wonderful, Just Be Paranoid And Protect The 802.11 Ok?

  60. Who cares about SonicBlue's actual product?... by Slashdot+Junky · · Score: 1

    Dear world,

    I don't particularly care about this specific product. I am excited about ethernet adapters being added to home audio/video components. What's particularly cool about a DVD player with a built-in NIC is that, if hackable like other DVD players, it could become a cheap networked MP3 player.

    Later,
    -Slashdot Junky

    --
    .
    Landfill Mining Co.
    Managing the (Un)natural Resources of Tomorrow
  61. Informative??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's see how many freaks we can add to ekrout! Click here and add him as a foe!

  62. XBox + XBoxMediaPlayer already has this by illumin8 · · Score: 1

    I already have this identical setup at my house, and it works like a dream.

    Here are the components:

    XBox - $199
    Matrix modchip - $50
    802.11b access point running in wireless client mode - $99

    Now I can stream JPEG photos, MP3s, MPEG, AVI, and Divx movies to my television from a RelaX media server running Linux.

    Xbox Media Player 2.0 is GPL, gives you a great user interface and is very user friendly. If you haven't checked it out, please do so.

    --
    "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
  63. Transmit the Video signal by gargnitin · · Score: 1

    For $20 get a cheap video card with component out. Add a $70 wireless video and mouse transmitter/remote from x10 and you have everything your PC can dish out.

  64. Plenty fast... by Christopher+Bibbs · · Score: 2

    That's because the decoder for DivX is software based rather than dedicated hardware. Give the player a dedicated chip and it'd be easy... kinda the same way they all handle the MPEG-2 on DVDs.

  65. Re:Pr0n In the Office - PORN PORN PORN by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    Let's see...

    Porn, porn, porn, XXX porn, XXXXX porn...

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  66. Re:Fast enough? (My experience) by soulsteal · · Score: 2

    Very occasionally for no apparent reason I'm unable to use the player

    Very occaisionally? Is that like the shirt size "extra medium?"

  67. Re:Is it worth the $$? (No) by FleshWound · · Score: 2
    I would much rather see them just stick a cheap 10/100 ethernet port on the back of the unit and not charge me for the wireless technology.
    Read the article. The player comes bundled with an Ethernet port. The 802.11b adapter must be purchased separately.
  68. Real people don't have PCs in their living room by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're a teenager, a college student or a pimple-faced geek living in an efficiency you may have a PC in your living room and, thus, TV out will be just fine for you. But, real people don't have PCs next to their TV. Get married or move in with a woman. No way will they want a PC in the living room unless it's a dedicated media PC.

  69. IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DVD Players have Computers as peripherals. (rimshot)

  70. No thanks, I'll keep my TiVo by stevel · · Score: 2

    Perhaps because I'm smart enough to look at a PC and realize that it would make a lousy PVR. I know what a real PVR is like (I own two TiVos), and a power-hungry PC operating off a generic program guide isn't it. A good PVR is so much more than a hard-disk VCR, but it's hard to explain to someone who hasn't lived with a good PVR such as TiVo.

    So we're looking here at a DVD player that can fetch pictures and music off of a PC. Fine. What makes this any kind of step towards a PC-based PVR? All I have to do is run the video output from the graphics card to the A/V input of my receiver, and then futz with the kludgy remote control solutions, to play video from the PC to the TV. You don't need a DVD player for that. Oh, you want wireless? There are plenty of wireless audio/video transmitter devices around.

    Yes, there have been a lot of attempts to turn a PC into a PVR. All of them have failed miserably so far - they're expensive, fragile, and don't come anywhere near the simplicity of use of a good purpose-built PVR with a service behind it. I'm sure that one of these efforts will come up with something that demos well, but I doubt it will appeal to a larger audience.

    Yes, a PVR is full of recognizeable bits of a PC - there's a processor, a hard disk or two, video encoders and decoders, and some software. But this doesn't mean that a PC would make a good PVR, any more than a PC would make a good bedside alarm clock.

    There's a lot more to a PVR than just these bits - multiple inputs and outputs, control of cable and satellite boxes, a quiet, low-power box that can sit next to your TV and doesn't cost a lot and can be dedicated to its purpose.

    A PC-based video recorder has its uses. But a PVR it's not.

  71. Their site is terrible by dalangalma · · Score: 1

    That has to be one of the most confusing, unhelpful web pages I've ever seen. It's too many small, unconnected blurbs of different color all splashed on the page at once, without any logic as to what box is related to what other box. I noticed the links at the top, but at that point I was to disgusted to keep browsing.