I agree that what ISIS is doing is reprehensible to the highest degree. However the question isn't about what they are doing is terror but rather blocking websites (free speech) in the name of terror.
Maybe in a historical context those sites and their contents will be "allowed" once again but effectively it is an infringement at this time. Islamist, jihadists, muslim extremist or terrorists are all words that we can label them with and rightfully so. However when we start blocking/censoring ideology, religious or otherwise, because we disagree with it or find it distasteful or even horrifying, we start to fall into the trap of ideological warfare ourselves.
They are killing all. Warriors, politicians, aid workers and journalists and anyone else they can in a bid to cement control to wipe out any individual free thought or thinker by terrorizing those they supposedly want to rule. So in the end it is a political movement based on an ideology of control rather than religion. Religion is just a convenient excuse.
In US, the populace was coerced to support wars on the fear mongering by the politicians, and what is sad that even today a sizable group supports those false premises. One direct result of the terror wars is ISIS and the mess the region has become.
Its easy for me to say "mess" sitting so far away in safety while those there are living and dying with no recourse. I only wish there had been stronger opposition to the War on Terror in US before the Iraq invasion. But back than any conversation against was considered unpatriotic and god forbid we have unpatriotic conversations.
yayy you and 3 other guys that are protected maybe!! chances are your other family members are probably not so secure and they may introduce devices to your network that are compromised. the correct answer is give up:)
not give up security but just the internet... i hope this pigeon reaches/.
true as that maybe, it still flies in the face of the transparent govt. platform President Obama ran upon. the courts have also ruled that the corporations are citizens... again just because the ruling says so doesn't make it right.
the question really isn't about privacy, but rather about freedom. Not the freedom as is touted but rather freedom from consequences of no-privacy. repercussions of free speech without the protection of anonymity would be one. Just look at any whistle blower in recent history. That is at a governmental scale. However just think about having your private words, pictures, correspondence in public domain with the narrow minded social infrastructure that current US society displays in its fervor... Make a provocative comment and be censured from work, friends and future prospects...
I am willing to buy the argument, if you are not guilty you shouldn't have anything to hide when the society is at a socially elevated level to accept people as they are without judgement... and no I won't hold my breath for that to happen.
America does want that, the fear mongering and bigotry runs rampant in just enough of America to allow this to continue. May be one day enough America may not want it... might be too late by then.
"lack of (local) storage" is a technological issue. not sure on the numbers but it is possible that Apple produces enough during the day to offset its use at night and being "hang off the grid" is the energy storage system during peak production.
Slashdot Mirror
they are only citizens when buying votes, other rules don't apply.
Well said.
I agree that what ISIS is doing is reprehensible to the highest degree. However the question isn't about what they are doing is terror but rather blocking websites (free speech) in the name of terror.
Maybe in a historical context those sites and their contents will be "allowed" once again but effectively it is an infringement at this time. Islamist, jihadists, muslim extremist or terrorists are all words that we can label them with and rightfully so. However when we start blocking/censoring ideology, religious or otherwise, because we disagree with it or find it distasteful or even horrifying, we start to fall into the trap of ideological warfare ourselves.
They are killing all. Warriors, politicians, aid workers and journalists and anyone else they can in a bid to cement control to wipe out any individual free thought or thinker by terrorizing those they supposedly want to rule. So in the end it is a political movement based on an ideology of control rather than religion. Religion is just a convenient excuse.
In US, the populace was coerced to support wars on the fear mongering by the politicians, and what is sad that even today a sizable group supports those false premises. One direct result of the terror wars is ISIS and the mess the region has become.
Its easy for me to say "mess" sitting so far away in safety while those there are living and dying with no recourse. I only wish there had been stronger opposition to the War on Terror in US before the Iraq invasion. But back than any conversation against was considered unpatriotic and god forbid we have unpatriotic conversations.
that info is on a terror site and cannot be confirmed for truth... by the very fact you mention it probably makes you a terrorist.
that's terrorist talk right there
its only terrorism when those we don;t agree with do it.
yayy looks like the redundant pigeon made it, lost one to MITM... poor Louis you will be missed.
yayy you and 3 other guys that are protected maybe!! :)
chances are your other family members are probably not so secure and they may introduce devices to your network that are compromised.
the correct answer is give up
not give up security but just the internet... i hope this pigeon reaches /.
let me check with Hilary and see if she has some records of those emails
the decision to make Office of Administration less transparent is entirely on the President.
true as that maybe, it still flies in the face of the transparent govt. platform President Obama ran upon.
the courts have also ruled that the corporations are citizens... again just because the ruling says so doesn't make it right.
"decent human beings" then perhaps you shouldn;t have named the department DHS... (Depraved Human Shits)
even AC understands this is no news for anybody let alone nerds!!
hence the headline..."Kim Stanley Robinson Says Colonizing Mars Won't Be As Easy As He Thought" it will be easier :)
a shitty product should be shat upon regardless of actually being smart enough to not pay for it.
and the judiciary is part of which conglomerate?
landshark drones?
"FCC doesn't look to kindly upon"
wasn't planning to show it a nipple.
also "truck won't be too far from the drone" unless you arm it with HARM what good is that going to do?
the question really isn't about privacy, but rather about freedom. Not the freedom as is touted but rather freedom from consequences of no-privacy.
repercussions of free speech without the protection of anonymity would be one. Just look at any whistle blower in recent history. That is at a governmental scale. However just think about having your private words, pictures, correspondence in public domain with the narrow minded social infrastructure that current US society displays in its fervor...
Make a provocative comment and be censured from work, friends and future prospects...
I am willing to buy the argument, if you are not guilty you shouldn't have anything to hide when the society is at a socially elevated level to accept people as they are without judgement... and no I won't hold my breath for that to happen.
America does want that, the fear mongering and bigotry runs rampant in just enough of America to allow this to continue.
May be one day enough America may not want it... might be too late by then.
"enhances the experience for users"
that's why super-fish is mandatory and installed on all their corporate PCs?
as it turns out, not one of my devices or the any blob inside is hammer proof. /. to answer your curiosity.
i hope this pigeon makes it to
the empire must fall some how... that is the the sound of inevitability...
"leaving law enforcement a way in"
like a warrant?
"lack of (local) storage" is a technological issue.
not sure on the numbers but it is possible that Apple produces enough during the day to offset its use at night and being "hang off the grid" is the energy storage system during peak production.
a decrease in carbon consumption.
a decrease in PGE's bottom line (fuck em)