Why install a router? That's a HELL of a lot more expensive than a splitter. It's not the right piece of equipment for this job.
As far as the entire contents of the data stream being sent to some other location, Klein does not state that in either the deposition or his interview that I linked to that this was happening.
Plus why would you install the Narus in SF if you had some central location with all the traffic? It would be more logical to place the DPI operation at this central location.
I think collection of the data and sending it to another location is just something the tinfoil had crowd has made up. It doesn't make sense in any way. Collection of all the internet traffic would require a shadow internet with the capacity of the entire internet.
It is a far more sane idea to do the data extraction at the telecom hubs.
DPI = deep packet inspection. A TCP/IP packet contains header(s) and body. The header tells you the address and some info re the protocol. The body is the content. Most internet infrastructure only cares about the header. Something that is capable of DPI will recover the content of some types of packets. Which ones depends on the capability of the DPI unit you use.
So if you want to search for email sent to joe@there.com you need to use DPI because the email header is in the body.
Use of a splitter is step one for DPI.
This article talks about the AT&T / Mark Klein incident:
A switch room that contains a deep packet scanner is not the same thing as sending ALL internet traffic to a storage system. More likely it's just a tap.
The thing that makes me doubt this is the cost. To funnel a copy of the internet to the Feds would require building a shadow internet plus storage for the whole thing.
Somebody isn't giving you the current science on this topic.
The early to the beginning of the late Ordovician was very hot, and had the highest sea levels of the Paleozoic due to those high levels of CO2 from vulcanism.
In the late Ordovician vulcanism subsided and the earth cooled due to the drop in CO2 to the point where there was an ice age and mass extinction events.
If it's a bleeding edge thing yes I will buy an extended warranty.
For example I bought an extended warranty on my first large screen TV. Good thing I did too becuase the guts failed twice on it and I ended up with 3x the warranty cost being free repairs. Later ones are a lot cheaper and a lot more reliable.
Other stuff not so much. I bought one on a car because of the price - 8 year coverage for $1000 on a $40,000 car. Odds are pretty favorable the this one will pay off.
I don't agree with anything you have said. Every state in the US allows adoption by single parents. It's not an argument.
Another fact of the matter is that there is research that shows gay parents on average get just as good results as hetero parents and better than single parents, and far better than foster homes. Gay parents after all have to make a real commitment to the process before getting a child. What matters most seems to be the number of parents.
The idea that states have a right to reject marriage certificates from other states is completely preposterous. The Constitution forbids such a thing in Article Four.
The Constitution makes it very clear that states are supposed to accept each other's laws.
It's something the Founders thought made a LOT of sense.
Article Four: "Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State"
DOMA is unconstitutional just based on the fact that it attempts to get in the way of this process. It really is a miserable shitty law in every respect.
Lots of things aren't mentioned in the Constitution. This is why we have the 9th Amendment which makes it CRYSTAL CLEAR that the Constitution does not contain an enumeration of the rights of the people, and that not listing a right means nothing about whether or not such a right exists.
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
The problem with banning gay marriage is the ideal of equal protection under the law, which is expressed in the 14th Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America.
States and the Federal Government pass laws that give tax benefits and other privileges to married couples, and then pass laws that restrict people from marrying based on sex.
This fundamentally wrong. It's enshrined in the 14th Amendment that "no state shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
There are only two ways around this. Remove laws that give privileges to married couples or make gay marriage legal.
You can't have a situation where your laws grant privileges to a specific group of people and not others. It is fundamentally WRONG.
The correlation has some quite notable exeptions, including the continent of Austrailia and parts of Europe including France and Switzerland where neonicinoids are not used.
Slashdot Mirror
GE did not pay zero taxes. That's just bad reporting from the NY Times.
http://www.factcheck.org/2012/04/warren-ge-pays-no-taxes/
Why install a router? That's a HELL of a lot more expensive than a splitter. It's not the right piece of equipment for this job.
As far as the entire contents of the data stream being sent to some other location, Klein does not state that in either the deposition or his interview that I linked to that this was happening.
Plus why would you install the Narus in SF if you had some central location with all the traffic? It would be more logical to place the DPI operation at this central location.
I think collection of the data and sending it to another location is just something the tinfoil had crowd has made up. It doesn't make sense in any way. Collection of all the internet traffic would require a shadow internet with the capacity of the entire internet.
It is a far more sane idea to do the data extraction at the telecom hubs.
Apprentice. Disney was the primary advocate and beneficiary of the Sonny Bono Act.
How the hell are you going to get the signal to the DPI infrastructure without installing a splitter?
Of course. Big infrastructure isn't off the self. It takes time.
So extrapolations say by the end of 2015 we are going to have a 1 zettabyte per year run rate.
that would be 1x10^21. Divide by 3.5x10^9 => 3x10^11
That's about half of the 2011 world production of hard drives.
If they are doing it now, they aren't going to be able to keep it up for long.
So you are saying the NSA flooded Thailand to hide it's purchase of hard drives?
DPI = deep packet inspection. A TCP/IP packet contains header(s) and body. The header tells you the address and some info re the protocol. The body is the content. Most internet infrastructure only cares about the header. Something that is capable of DPI will recover the content of some types of packets. Which ones depends on the capability of the DPI unit you use.
So if you want to search for email sent to joe@there.com you need to use DPI because the email header is in the body.
Use of a splitter is step one for DPI.
This article talks about the AT&T / Mark Klein incident:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_packet_inspection#United_States
Here is Klein's statement.
https://www.eff.org/files/filenode/att/SER_klein_decl.pdf
The splitter sent the internet traffic to a secure room.
And another interview with Klein:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/homefront/interviews/klein.html
It's pretty obvious that room contained a Narus DPI. End of story.
A switch room that contains a deep packet scanner is not the same thing as sending ALL internet traffic to a storage system. More likely it's just a tap.
The thing that makes me doubt this is the cost. To funnel a copy of the internet to the Feds would require building a shadow internet plus storage for the whole thing.
One season of locally cold weather is a simple fluctuation. You need to consider all the data.
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01/08/16413805-noaa-2012-was-warmest-year-ever-for-us-second-most-extreme?lite
Somebody isn't giving you the current science on this topic.
The early to the beginning of the late Ordovician was very hot, and had the highest sea levels of the Paleozoic due to those high levels of CO2 from vulcanism.
In the late Ordovician vulcanism subsided and the earth cooled due to the drop in CO2 to the point where there was an ice age and mass extinction events.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/CO2-levels-during-the-late-Ordovician.html
The report seems to be from the USDA, not the EPA. There are some contributors from the EPA though.
It's not that simple.
Some countries like Switzerland that don't have
2. Introduction of pesticide
do have
3. Bees die.
While other countries like Australia that have
2. Introduction of pesticide
don't have
3. Bees die.
Monsanto does not produce neonicitinoids.
If it's a bleeding edge thing yes I will buy an extended warranty.
For example I bought an extended warranty on my first large screen TV. Good thing I did too becuase the guts failed twice on it and I ended up with 3x the warranty cost being free repairs. Later ones are a lot cheaper and a lot more reliable.
Other stuff not so much. I bought one on a car because of the price - 8 year coverage for $1000 on a $40,000 car. Odds are pretty favorable the this one will pay off.
I don't agree with anything you have said. Every state in the US allows adoption by single parents. It's not an argument.
Another fact of the matter is that there is research that shows gay parents on average get just as good results as hetero parents and better than single parents, and far better than foster homes. Gay parents after all have to make a real commitment to the process before getting a child. What matters most seems to be the number of parents.
The idea that states have a right to reject marriage certificates from other states is completely preposterous. The Constitution forbids such a thing in Article Four.
The Necessary and Proper, the General Welfare clause and the Commerce clause give the federal government a lot of power.
Add this to the fact that the 10th Amendment does not contain the word 'explicitly' and you have a bunch of implied powers.
Hamilton's argument of sovereignty was also adopted by the Supreme Court in 1811 giving the Federal Government a lot of flexibility.
The Constitution makes it very clear that states are supposed to accept each other's laws.
It's something the Founders thought made a LOT of sense.
Article Four: "Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State"
DOMA is unconstitutional just based on the fact that it attempts to get in the way of this process. It really is a miserable shitty law in every respect.
EIGHT Federal Courts have found section 3 of DOMA to be unconstitutional on various grounds.
It's just taken time for the cases to get to the Supreme Court.
Lots of things aren't mentioned in the Constitution. This is why we have the 9th Amendment which makes it CRYSTAL CLEAR that the Constitution does not contain an enumeration of the rights of the people, and that not listing a right means nothing about whether or not such a right exists.
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
The problem with banning gay marriage is the ideal of equal protection under the law, which is expressed in the 14th Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America.
States and the Federal Government pass laws that give tax benefits and other privileges to married couples, and then pass laws that restrict people from marrying based on sex.
This fundamentally wrong. It's enshrined in the 14th Amendment that "no state shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
There are only two ways around this. Remove laws that give privileges to married couples or make gay marriage legal.
You can't have a situation where your laws grant privileges to a specific group of people and not others. It is fundamentally WRONG.
Those massive abuses may still be less destructive than what we have now.
The correlation has some quite notable exeptions, including the continent of Austrailia and parts of Europe including France and Switzerland where neonicinoids are not used.
http://www.vicbeekeepers.com.au/what-is-wrong-with-our-bees-.html
Some other resource will limit growth.
Duh.
The most important video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umFnrvcS6AQ