Slashdot Mirror


EA Is the Game Company Disney Was Looking For

An anonymous reader writes "Electronic Arts announced today it has landed an exclusive multi-year agreement to develop and publish games based on Lucasfilms' Star Wars universe. EA said the it will create and publish Star Wars games for a 'core gaming audience' across 'all popular platforms' and genres. The EA studios creating those 'core' Star Wars games are Battlefield developer DICE, Dead Space developer Visceral Games and Mass Effect house BioWare."

254 comments

  1. Great... by SanDogWeps · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Now all EA games will come with free misery AND a Force Choke...

    1. Re:Great... by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Insightful

      EA promises to do for Lucas Arts what Disney pledges to do for Lucasfilm.

      This is following the lead established by McDonalds - and what they've done for beef.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    2. Re:Great... by innerweb · · Score: 1

      In other words, I will not be spending any money on these either.

      --
      Freud might say that Intelligent Design is religion's ID.
    3. Re:Great... by failedlogic · · Score: 2

      Free? .... "misery And Force choke? Really, Free?! I think you'll have to pay EA for these as DLC on first day. And chances are, the game won't run without misery.

      Sooner or later, you'll have to pay to have a player that walks and runs - $1.99 each.

      I haven't played the online Starwars mmporg, but the original Bioware Knights of Old Republic I & II (save for a few annoying characters ... which seems the norm for the SW universe .... ) were among the best games I've ever played. Now EA owns Bioware, which means Bioware cannot be any better than any EA game. Sigh.

    4. Re: Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They'll just change the name of the series to "Customer Wars" and start calling their DRM "The Force".

    5. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously you don't know EA. The game will come with free misery and a force choke, yes, but you'll have to pay for a DLC key to unlock both of them.

    6. Re:Great... by 24-bit+Voxel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Same here. For me, if it's not on steam it doesn't exist. And since EA isn't on steam... well... it's as if hundreds of games screamed out in isolation and were suddenly silenced.

    7. Re:Great... by lactose99 · · Score: 1

      Now all EA games will come with free misery AND a Force Choke...

      ...only if you preorder at Gamestop

      --
      Fully licensed blockchain psychiatrist
    8. Re:Great... by westlake · · Score: 4, Insightful

      EA promises to do for Lucas Arts what Disney pledges to do for Lucasfilm

      You hear any Marvel Comics fan complaining about Disney? Didn't think so.

    9. Re:Great... by Dahamma · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, to be honest Disney will be hard pressed to mangle the Star Wars franchise any more than George Lucas did.

    10. Re:Great... by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      Yup. Pretty much anything this shithole has to say is useless.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    11. Re:Great... by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      You have one here.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    12. Re:Great... by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      You hear any Marvel Comics fan complaining about Disney?

      Disney came fairly late to the "Marvel Cinematic Universe" franchise, and even then all they are is a distributor...Paramount and Marvel are the creative and monetary forces behind the franchise.

      My guess is that since Disney was the only studio that wasn't cashing in on superhero movies, they found a way to make some money off the genre.

    13. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Presumably that's why they hired EA.

    14. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't have problems with DRM per se. I do have problems with DRM when it becomes disruptive. Steam isn't disruptive. Sometimes there are glitches in their system, but occurrences are few and far between nowadays, I can't really remember the last time I have had a problem. It allows people to install their games on an unlimited number of computers regardless of os. Game updates are reliable and unobtrusive. They give the little guy massive help by making sure indie games get as good exposure as the triple a titles. Not to mention the fact that they always have something on sale.

    15. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For me, if it's not on steam it doesn't exist. And since EA isn't on steam... well... it's as if hundreds of games screamed out in isolation and were suddenly silenced.

      Wow. Such love for a DRM-system on Slashdot. With a little bit of luck, Steam/Valve will piss off Anonymous (by supporting "evil" legislation) and their servers go down for a week or so.

    16. Re:Great... by lexsird · · Score: 1

      Not many released for the PC? Are you a recent sufferer of blunt force trauma to the head? I'm seriously concerned.

      --
      Take the Red Pill.
    17. Re:Great... by steelfood · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Not yet.

      Marvel isn't nearly as integrated into the Disney culture (and doesn't integrate nearly as well) as Pixar or Lucasfilm, whose content matter can be described as wholesome, and if not then sanitized. On the other hand, Marvel's stories deal with darker, more complex, and more adult issues. These are issues that Disney is not accustomed to working with.

      Marvel is the lone adult in a room full of infantile children. In fact, this may actually be a fair description of the relationship between Marvel's culture and Disney's culture. For now, Marvel is safe, because Disney doesn't really know what to do with Marvel. Yet. But as George Carlin says, "Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience." As in the same way that a child wouldn't know what to do with an adult initially, it'll only be a matter of time before Disney does exactly that with Marvel.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    18. Re:Great... by TheLongshot · · Score: 1

      You mean how they farmed out the video game development to Sega, who has made relatively lackluster Marvel games? Yeah, actually there is a lot to complain about...

    19. Re:Great... by gumOnShoe · · Score: 1

      To be fair, EA has produced okay games. Yeah, their library is huge and full of crap, but they can produce a good game when they want to. The main complaint everyone has is DRM, right? Disney really means one thing: Merchandising We shouldn't be surprised when this happens, but typically, they need to do something to create fans to sell the stuff. So, yeah, I expect yoda dolls that come in sizes 1", 3", 6", 18", and 36" for those who really need a yoda that's bigger than yoda, but there's a good chance a good movie comes along with. With J.J. Abrams in the director's chair there's a very solid chance of that happening. The games could really go either way, but you'll need an internet connection to play them, lol.

    20. Re:Great... by Totenglocke · · Score: 4, Informative

      Check out Good Old Games (gog.com). They're all DRM free and that's where almost all of my game purchases are anymore, because I despise companies punishing people for buying their product.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    21. Re:Great... by Totenglocke · · Score: 1, Insightful

      But Steam (which yes, I own some games on) still has the fatal flaw of all DRM which means that they can take away your ability to play the games you paid for at any time they way. Since DRM means that you're only renting a game, the only games I buy with DRM are ones that are on sale for ridiculously low prices (such as $5 or less). I refuse to pay full price for something I don't own.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    22. Re:Great... by VanGarrett · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If all DRM were implemented the way it is implemented with Steam, then we wouldn't be having such heated arguments about DRM.

    23. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, Marvel's stories deal with darker, more complex, and more adult issues. These are issues that Disney is not accustomed to working with.

      That's a load of shit, Disney does their "complex, adult themes" under the Touchstone name: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_films_released_by_Touchstone_Pictures

    24. Re:Great... by Desler · · Score: 2

      Marvel's stories deal with darker, more complex, and more adult issues. These are issues that Disney is not accustomed to working with.

      Miramax was part of Disney for 17 years. You have heard of them, right?

    25. Re:Great... by geminidomino · · Score: 1, Troll

      Provided you're willing to eat whatever shit Valve decides to throw into the TOS. If not, well, kiss "your" games, and your cash, goodbye.

      It's only "non-disruptive" if you're already suffering the same corporate Stockholm Syndrome as the Blizzard and EA fans, just saluting a different flag.

    26. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've fucking got BioWare, the makers of KotOR, only the best RPG ever made.

      Star Wars game production is in better hands with EA than LucasArts in recent years.

    27. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the commercial says the beef is 100% naudan lihaa!

    28. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steam games requires an additional resource consuming application running in the background and an internet connection, even for single player.

    29. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't appear to realize that Disney owns Marvel - they are not just a distributor.

    30. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With J.J. Abrams in the director's chair there's a very solid chance of that happening

      As long as you don't care about the ending making sense or tying up any of the events in the first two acts...

    31. Re:Great... by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      The only games I buy with DRM are ones that are on sale for ridiculously low prices (such as $5 or less). I refuse to pay full price for something I don't own.

      Ditto

      And why do the online and offline shops insist on cluttering up my shelves with material rubbish anyway, since no-one else can use it, they might as well just email me a code for my rental.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    32. Re: Great... by geirlk · · Score: 1

      On a 4,3GHz quad core, with 32GB mem, how is it a problem that Steam runs in the background? It's not as if the games are 64bit and use most of the mem anyway.

      I can appreciate that bloat sucks, but that is hardly a problem for modern machines (say made in the last 4 years).

    33. Re: Great... by geirlk · · Score: 1

      I second that.

      Been a Steam user for going on 9 years. With the amounts of difficulties I've had, which is to say hardly any, compared to what I gain from the platform, I have no qualms recommending it.

    34. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For me, if it's on any bullshit DRM system posing as a service, it doesn't exist. Steam, Origin, doesn't matter.

      Not many computer games released for PC, these days. The ones that are tend to be lots more fun than some Orange Box shite though.

      It isn't hard to find and start the games from harddrive without launching steam. You'll miss out on cloud synced saves and some other features, but the games do run. Not really the definition of DRM.

    35. Re: Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody has those kinds of specs.

    36. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Steam is as good as it is ever going to get. Pick your battles. If you go with Steam then you will have a system that lets you play offline across several different computers and download files from the cloud. If you attack Steam, maybe EA's super paranoia system will win, where you can be banned from your always online EA games permanently for just making a critical comment in a message board (especially comments about how fucked up the game is due to DRM or asking for a refund).

    37. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but they can produce a good game when they want to

      Counterpoint: SimCity 4

    38. Re: Great... by geirlk · · Score: 1

      And my name is Nobody.

      My over 4, soon 5 years old rig was a Q9550 with 8GB mem. It didn't pose a problem there neither.
      And before that I had a E6400 (upgraded to Q6600) with 4GB of mem, still no probs.
      Before that, OK, Steam used a notable portion of your system resources.

        But if you're gaming on a 8+ years old rig, maybe PC gaming ain't your thang?

    39. Re:Great... by geirlk · · Score: 2

      I forgot to answer the claim of "...and an internet connection, even for single player".
      That is simply not true. There is offline mode. It works. And it can be enabled _after_ you lose connection, albeit it's a bit of a hassle then.

      As with most DRM services, you do have to log in every once in a while to update the info.

    40. Re: Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like getting a consistent 60 fps in modern games like Crysis 3, not some ancient Source engine shit. Don't need some artificial limitation like Steam causing hitching and fps spikes.

    41. Re:Great... by Mike+Frett · · Score: 2

      For me, if it's not Cross Platform (Win,Mac,Nix) then it's useless. Seriously, there isn't any reason NOT to have Cross Platform, more money is better than limited money from a single Platform that may or may not continue to exist in a few years, since XNA and DirectX is pretty much dead now, not to mention limited to a single Platform whereas OpenGL is available to all. Bottom line, there is more money to be made by being Cross Platform; It's also my understanding that a certain company actually pays Devs to make their Games exclusive.

      Thing is, the money given to them for being exclusive could probably be made up by being Cross Platform. So it still doesn't make any sense to be so single-platform minded. I mean, I've been thinking about making a small Game Company, but we're not going to develop for just one Platform when more Money can be made from multiple platforms. Not to mention more exposure and fans, a non-evil Company is what we're aiming for =)

      By the way, you don't think this EA agreement had something to do with the Jedi Knight source code being removed from SourceForge do ya. Not that it matters, everybody has it now and I've been playing Jedi Academy with the Linux port.

    42. Re: Great... by geirlk · · Score: 1

      So do I. And since I enjoy causing problems for myself, I game on a native resolution of 2560x1440.

      I seldom get those problems, and if I do, it's even rarer that Steam is the one causing them.
      It's not like it's a prerequisite that games need the Source engine to work on steam now is it?

      Multiplayer through steam is by far the best solution out there. If you know of any conistently better solution, I'd like to hear about it.
      And if you want to enjoy "steam free" singleplayer, go offline.

    43. Re:Great... by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Really? First post wasn't Vader's "NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!"?

    44. Re:Great... by Stizark · · Score: 1

      I'll second this suggestion. I've been using Gog for a few months now and have had an excellent experience.

    45. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As with most DRM services, you do have to log in every once in a while to update the info.

      Which completely contradicts what you just said. Good job.

    46. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll third this suggestion. GOG, Humble Bundle and indies who provide games without DRM are the only places I will pay money.

      I love GOG. I can buy a lot of the old games that I was always interested in, but never bought for whatever reason. I have also repurchased a number of games that I already own, simply because GOG patched/hacked them up to work flawlessly on modern operating systems. Additionally, one small but cool thing that GOG does is provide you with high resolution wallpapers, concept art, avatars, soundtracks and manuals for the games that you buy.

    47. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will admit I am not a big fan of Marvel Comics, there is a bit of work Marvel published that I did enjoy, and also I grew up reading many Marvel comics. That being said, I am not happy to see Disney and Marvel together, though Marvel had been losing my respect for years, with each and every movie release.

    48. Re:Great... by geirlk · · Score: 2

      How so?

      Are you claiming you have _no_ internet connection? WTF do you use Steam/digital distribution for then in the first place?
      It is still not "always online" SP.

    49. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steam is as good as it is ever going to get

      gog.com says otherwise. DRM is old, anachronistic and silly. Piracy is like death and taxes, it will always exist. You can't fight it, so don't even bother.

      DRM only punishes paying customers.

    50. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Steam is garbage. People like you only perpetuate the problem.

      Why do you hate fair exchange? Why do you prefer to be treated like a criminal? Why do you put so much trust into one company?

    51. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have an internet connection quite often, due to the fact that I travel more than six months out of the year. When I don't have a connection, that is when I most want to be able to play games.

      That is an always online, *artificial restriction*, just with an interval of one month. If I have to "check in" with big brother corporates from time to time for legally purchased games, then the deal is off. The Steam DRM also doesn't work when you travel from country to country, so Valve has this unnecessary distribution software that could be completely done on a standard web site and it's a global store, but not really, they artificially restrict it, just like they do for the monthly checkups.

    52. Re:Great... by dywolf · · Score: 1

      Yes.
      Good.
      One bright shining light of success amid the hundreds of IP's they own crying out from abuse and overexploitation...

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    53. Re:Great... by haystor · · Score: 1

      Don't tell me there will be plot holes in a space opera.

      --
      t
    54. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Star Trek? I mean we can be obsessed with Lost of we want to. I never saw Super 8, cause I'm not into that type of movie, but everything I heard said it was good for what it tried to be. Yawn, hate everything gets old.

    55. Re:Great... by Rotag_FU · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree with you more. Obviously nothing screams mature/adult themes more than a bunch of magical or unnaturally powerful characters dressing-up in costumes and playing cops and robbers. Oh wait...

    56. Re:Great... by geirlk · · Score: 1

      I've also travelled quite a bit, and haven't experienced that country problem you describe.

      Luckily, that is mostly not a problem for me, as I game from home usually. If it is for you, then I'm sorry about that.

      But I do not agree to your terms when it comes to defining "always online". As that has come to mean "a constant connection to the internet during the entire game session". Call it what it is, periodically online DRM check.

      Steam does fill my needs as is. Even though I'm not happy about DRM, I am a realist, and realize that a lot of the games I do have in steam today wouldn't have been sold digitally without DRM. Besides, it's not Valve/Steam that imposes DRM on the users, that is the distributors/developers choice. There are a lot of games sold on steam that doesn't use DRM (Try unhooking your net connection, and start the executables directly and have a look see).

      Another pretty much untouched subject on this topic is that Steam is today a lot more than just a digital shop for games, it is also pretty much a social channel for friends. Atleast that is how me and my friends us it. That is also one of the reasons I'm butt hurt about all those other clients like origin etc. popping up, which is also breaking up said community functions.

      While that is said; I'd also like to state that _I_ like Steam, and prefer it. I am not for "Steam exclusivity" or anything similar. Steam is my platform of choice. I am pro other shops like eg. gog.com selling the same games. But I do want everything through the one channel I've chosen, rather having to shop around for it.

    57. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://nooooooooooooooo.com/

    58. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean they didn't already?

    59. Re:Great... by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's almost as if we were open to a compromise between ourselves the customers and the producers of videogames. Wait, that's a symptom of someone who is being reasonable! Shit! Something is seriously wrong with slashdot!

    60. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because STEAM doesn't treat its costumers like criminals unless they are...

    61. Re:Great... by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1

      Now all EA games will come with free misery AND a Force Choke...

      More like they are hoping to use Jedi Mind Tricks on players in order to both do and have them forget the whole "It's not DRM! Its a feature that you can't opt out of !" DRM.

    62. Re:Great... by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      EA promises to do for Lucas Arts what Disney pledges to do for Lucasfilm.

      This is following the lead established by McDonalds - and what they've done for beef.

      Come on, man. You come off sounding like you think McDonalds has been bad for beef and people. Not only are they tasty, but McDonalds adds free mystery preservatives and free antibiotics! I ask, where else do you get something so valuable for free with a purchase? I will have you know I eat at least three double quarter pounders a day. They are delicious and full of protien. Some days, I go back for seconds or thirds if I need an extra energy boost and HNNNGH

    63. Re:Great... by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      I used to be broke and relatively careless. This was the early eighties.

      I was careless enough to eat these things. Not so careless that I went for the big macs or quarter pounders. I could buy three 39 cent regular burgers, and come out better fed than the single big mac, at that price.

      I last saw one of these violate my gullet in 2001. The money is better spent at the taco truck. :-)

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    64. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And since EA isn't on steam...

      huh?
        Steam search results for Electronic Arts

    65. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here. For me, if it's not on steam it doesn't exist. ...

      If you like DRM so much, what is your beef with EA?

    66. Re:Great... by mythosaz · · Score: 2

      Bioware still makes great games, despite EA owning them.

      They've spent pretty much the last DECADE making two games -- Mass Effect and Dragon Age -- both of which were, in a word, awesome. [Some argument can be made about the ending of ME3 being weak, but it doesn't ruin a great franchise.]

      Before that they did such duds as Neverwinter Nights and KOTOR.

      EA or not, I'll eat whatever Bioware is serving with a smile.

    67. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that writing software that's more easily ported forces developers to use some practices that are more sane, like abstracting the platform-specific code layers.

    68. Re:Great... by KingBenny · · Score: 1

      i made an exception to that rule for project entropia which i never took seriously but checked it out on the recent ad campaign, because it promises real money and some people seem to have done quite well with it. Other than that, steam theory prevails :) maybe mindark should consider making their stuff available via the one platform to rule them all, they seem to be looking for new clientele and what better way to reach a huge target audience, that will be interested in gaming for sure since the ad-campaign seems to be a bit more diffused than just the target audience (that's not really correct english is it ... i hope the message gets through though)

      --
      Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
    69. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GOG is great, but it seems to be missing some games that I'd like to play...

  2. I hear a thousand gamers cry out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Crap

  3. Sim DarthMicky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I really can't see how the best parts of Star Wars will shine through all the Disney marketing money machine.

    Seems to me that grinding out more shallow plot movies will just turn it into something like the Disney princesses series of movies. I guess that's the idea.

    1. Re: Sim DarthMicky by alen · · Score: 1

      Like George Lucas was a saint
      He created the whole marketing toys and crap with a movie concept

  4. Battlefield: Star Wars by SirSlud · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Make it happen.

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
    1. Re:Battlefield: Star Wars by doctor+woot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Make it happen.

      You've never played Battlefront?

    2. Re:Battlefield: Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Were you totally asleep for not only Star Wars: Battlefront but it's sequel as well? This has been done already, not that it wouldn't be nice to see a more graphically rich version.

    3. Re:Battlefield: Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Been done before. See: Battlefront, Battlefront II

    4. Re:Battlefield: Star Wars by Ironhandx · · Score: 1

      It always amazes me how many people have no idea either A) The game exists or if they have heard of it then B) That its basically Battlefield, star wars style.

      That game was so much fun. WTB Battlefront 3, with AT-ATs.

    5. Re:Battlefield: Star Wars by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      As sheep we buy what's given us and don't complain about what's taken away;
      making our own maps, mods, or even having control over our own servers.

      Blackmonkeys.de made a Star War mod for Call of Duty 4 and it's a lot of fun.
      http://www.moddb.com/mods/star-wars-mod-galactic-warfare

      You just can't do that anymore.

    6. Re:Battlefield: Star Wars by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      As for Battlefront's Star wars even the player comments say what the OP does.

      "For the love of GOD!! Put this on Dice's Frostbite 3 engine and its gaming orgasm!
      Hoth on FB3 would be mind blowing! 64 players, walkers and speeders......passes out....."

      "Now that EA has the reigns.....I'm sorry if the idea of the BATTLEFIELD 4 (or even 3)
      Frostbite Engine coupled with STAR WARS: BATTLEFRONT doesn't make you drool....
      You are truly dead inside as a gamer."

      http://www.joystiq.com/2013/05/06/star-wars-battlefront-3-live-stream-new-footage-appears/

    7. Re:Battlefield: Star Wars by smash · · Score: 1

      Just what we need, another clone of Battlefield 2 with new skins.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    8. Re:Battlefield: Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Were you totally asleep for not only Star Wars: Battlefront but it is sequel as well?

      ^ This is what you said.

    9. Re:Battlefield: Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Now that EA has the reigns

      Moron.

    10. Re:Battlefield: Star Wars by SirSlud · · Score: 1

      Of course I played Battlefront. I guess I should have specified: Battlefield on Frostbite 3: Star Wars.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
  5. Lando Reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This deal is getting worse all the time.

    1. Re:Lando Reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now just wait a second, they didn't even mention anything about a "free" pre-order same-day DLC content yet.

      PS: My captcha is "COWLICK" what?

    2. Re:Lando Reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This deal is getting worse all the time...

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WpE_xMRiCLE

  6. Well, they needed an evil empire... by DanielRavenNest · · Score: 4, Funny

    And with Electronic Arts, I guess they found one.

    1. Re:Well, they needed an evil empire... by ericloewe · · Score: 1

      I think that's a bit too much to say. At least the Empire learned from its mistakes and didn't add a spectacular design flaw to the second Death Star. EA just seems to enjoy piling on design flaws and not fixing stuff.

    2. Re:Well, they needed an evil empire... by suutar · · Score: 1

      Except putting the shield generator outside the shield. WTF!?!?!

    3. Re:Well, they needed an evil empire... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Presumably a decision made to take advantage of the local cheap ewok labour. A lesson in outsourcing for us all.

    4. Re:Well, they needed an evil empire... by Imrik · · Score: 2

      I feel obliged to point out that the shield in question was intended to protect it while it was under construction, not while it was in use. Also, to reach that shield they needed authorization which may have included letting them through the local planetary shields.

    5. Re:Well, they needed an evil empire... by suomynonAyletamitlU · · Score: 1

      I have to say, the headline honestly surprised me. A franchise with as much potential as Star Wars, and yet it's like they went with the lowest bidder.

      Or do they not have google at Disney? Virtually the entire first page of results for "EA Reputation" slams them, or is full of people very blatantly trying to work around the accepted fact that EA has a god-awful reputation.

      I can find no words. Really, honestly, it is shocking. It's like the first thought was, "Let's get some businesses in here", and then they went into group-think. The immediate reaction I would have had--no, scratch that, I probably wouldn't if I were as rich as Disney, and had scammy showmen knocking at my door, but the first reaction I damn well SHOULD have had is, "Will they make good product?" And the judge of that isn't what executives think, it's what the target audience thinks.

      Those reports about EA being named the worst company in America two years running are, without a doubt, overblown. However, they are the target audience providing feedback over the quality of the product.

      Disney handed it over.

      I don't get it. Do we need to email them the link? http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=ea+reputation

    6. Re:Well, they needed an evil empire... by ikaruga · · Score: 1

      Nah, Disney is a pretty damn Evil Empire on its own. EA licencing deal is more like an alliance with the Mandalorians.

    7. Re:Well, they needed an evil empire... by rmdashrf · · Score: 1

      That's what all Empire apologists say.

      --
      Nihil in publicum sputa.
    8. Re:Well, they needed an evil empire... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was no Ewoks on Hoth.

    9. Re:Well, they needed an evil empire... by wertigon · · Score: 1

      No, but we're discussing the second Death Star and the shield generator around it, not the Battle of Hoth.

      The shield generator on Hoth, incidentally, protected the planet from orbital planetary bombardment. It did what it was supposed to do, but could not stop ground troops from coming down to the surface and destroy it.

      --
      systemd is not an init system. It's a GNU replacement.
    10. Re:Well, they needed an evil empire... by suutar · · Score: 1

      That's true, but they really should have had a functional shield generator aboard the Death Star II before declaring it "fully functional". (Of course, the one calling it functional was the Emperor; he may have been exaggerating a bit, secure in the feeling that nobody would dare contradict him...)

  7. How apropos! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... just waiting for the best of the Star Wars quotes to float to the top now ...

  8. Noooooooooo!!!!!1! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    http://nooooooooooooooo.com

  9. It's a trap!!! by DougOtto · · Score: 0

    It had to be said.

    --
    Solving Unix problems since 1989...
    1. Re:It's a trap!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it really didnt.

  10. Mediocrity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And so the lineage of mostly-forgettable Star Wars games continues unabated...

    1. Re:Mediocrity by grimmjeeper · · Score: 2

      Oh no, they will be very memorable. If they're anything like the latest Sim City, expect them to blow up like the Death Star.

    2. Re:Mediocrity by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      I don't know, Bioware made KOTOR and that was one of the better Star Wars games ever made. Despite what people think some of the EA studios still have a bit of creativity left. (Then again after trying to play Dragon Age it may be fading fast...)

    3. Re:Mediocrity by Kam+Solusar · · Score: 1

      And then they made The Old Republic, which was mediocre at best and an accumulation of clusterfucks the rest of the time. The more you read about the development process, the more you realize that this game is a prime example of how not to manage a AAA game development project.

      --
      The Angels have the Phone Box
    4. Re:Mediocrity by Baloroth · · Score: 1

      I don't know, Bioware made KOTOR and that was one of the better Star Wars games ever made.

      Yes, but they made that *before* being bought out by EA. After being bought out, they made Star Wars The Old Republic (aka WoW, with lightsabers, but somehow still lame).

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    5. Re:Mediocrity by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Don't know, I gave up on MMORPGs a long time ago (I think Ultima Online was my first and last, actually ;)

      If that's the direction they want to go, ugh. But they also made the Mass Effect series and I was pretty happy with that overall (given it's basically the same engine as KOTOR, you can see where my game tastes lie... still waiting for a Jade Empire sequel...)

    6. Re:Mediocrity by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Many of those KOTOR guys ended up at Obsidian entertainment. They have had their fair amount of issues turning good games out since the split. The rest did end up doing Mass Effect.

  11. No sweat off my back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I gave up on buying anything made by EA. I hope Disney changes their mind about tethering themselves to a sinking ship, but if not, it's not like there has ever been a must have Star Wars game.

  12. Merchandising within merchandising by Dynedain · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can see the tie-ins now... Star Wars Sims: Make your Ewok's spend less time brushing their teeth with Crest!

    --
    I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    1. Re:Merchandising within merchandising by dufachi · · Score: 2

      Where's My Force Lightning?
      An anthropomorphic tie-fighter movie
      The full Episode 4 using Disney iconic characters with the witch from Sleeping Beauty as Darth Vader
      Star Wars Social - beg your friends to help you outfit your own Jedi college that randomly gets murdered by a rogue Jedi turning to the dark side.

      --
      -Kinsey
    2. Re:Merchandising within merchandising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say they should try Square if it wasn't for the Final Fantasy 14 train wreck.

      Kingdom Hearts just screams Disney.

    3. Re:Merchandising within merchandising by White+Flame · · Score: 4, Informative

      The full Episode 4 using Disney iconic characters with the witch from Sleeping Beauty as Darth Vader

      Her name is Maleficent, which is a pretty cool villain name to know.

  13. Is Disney Blind? by ohnocitizen · · Score: 2

    Why go with a company who has been making the news for broken games and abrasive customer service? Are executives at Disney really ok with taking such a big risk on such a valuable property?

    1. Re:Is Disney Blind? by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      Why go with a company who has been making the news for broken games and abrasive customer service? Are executives at Disney really ok with taking such a big risk on such a valuable property?

      maybe the deal is such that disney makes money no matter what.

      the only game company stupid enough - and with enough cash going around(even if they're not making cash well) would be EA.

      I'm not holding my breath for another TIE fighter classic though.....

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Is Disney Blind? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Why go with a company who has been making the news for broken games and abrasive customer service?

      Because EA is still making more money than $RANDOMDEITY, because the average gamer doesn't really give a shit and will happily buy Medal of Duty: Call of Honor 15: Infinite Titanium Xtreme as soon as it hits the shelves after a period of no beta testing.

    3. Re:Is Disney Blind? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disney doesn't want to do good games. They just want to siphon all the money they can out of their customers.

      EA is a match made in heaven for them, they've got the same attitude.

    4. Re:Is Disney Blind? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      birds of a feather then?

    5. Re:Is Disney Blind? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems to me the model to emulate would be Warner Brothers where they've increasingly been doing development in studios they own rather than licensing. It seems like a better model for maintaining and growing a franchise rather than cashing in on it and using up its credibility.

    6. Re:Is Disney Blind? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They better pray that EA doesn't "alter the deal".

    7. Re:Is Disney Blind? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There's a Call of Duty 15 out?? (swipes credit card at computer screen)

    8. Re:Is Disney Blind? by westlake · · Score: 1

      Why go with a company who has been making the news for broken games and abrasive customer service? Are executives at Disney really ok with taking such a big risk on such a valuable property?

      There is no risk.

      2,100 rants posted to Amazon.com hasn't broken SimCity's hold on the top ten bestseller lists in PC games.

    9. Re:Is Disney Blind? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because for every dissatisfied old man out there, there's 3 new uninformed people just itching to get the latest and the greatest. You know... the emerging markets...

    10. Re:Is Disney Blind? by firex726 · · Score: 1

      That's basically what LucasArts had been doing, and they ended up producing crap or just sitting on the IP.
      People have wanted new Tie FIghter, Grim Fandango, etc... games but Lucas would never license out the IP to them to develop the games.

  14. So, nothing has changed then. by uCallHimDrJ0NES · · Score: 1

    Is there really anything different about this, other than who manages the projects? Given this list of studios, it seems unlikely anything will change as far as the kinds of Star Wars game projects that get approved.

    --
    Cloudiot: A person who does not see offsite storage as a way to lose control over access to his or her own data.
  15. EA = evil assholes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EA sux and their games dont work

  16. EA DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    EA's DRM will now stand for Darkside Rights Management

    1. Re:EA DRM by mjwx · · Score: 1

      EA's DRM will now stand for Darkside Rights Management

      I would have thought a Stargate tie in would have been more appropriate.... At least then they could tell people about the power of Origin.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  17. Uhm....EA and Bioware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't they already fuck up the latest and greatest WoW-killer MMO of the decade SW:TOR?

    What makes you think EA will have money to pay you when they go under later this decade Disney?

    Or are you angling to be a primary creditor and take properties off their hands?

    1. Re:Uhm....EA and Bioware... by firex726 · · Score: 1

      Despite the common mantra here, EA still has quite a bit of money, and is selling record numbers of their main franchise games.

  18. evil + evil = by citylivin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Profit!

    Time to buy some stock!

    --
    As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
  19. Ongoing boycott by CmdrEdem · · Score: 2

    Since EA said it would require Simcity to be always on (Yeah, I predicted correctly that shit would hit the fan at launch just like Diablo 3) I started boycotting EA. Luckily I`ll always have the back catalog of awesome Star War games. Farewell Star Wars games, may the force be with you. And I`m not talking about Starforce.

    --
    This combination doesn`t exist: ETIs that know about humanity and want to see us dead. Otherwise we wouldn't exist.
    1. Re:Ongoing boycott by Artemis3 · · Score: 1

      Battlefield 2142 was the last game i purchased from them, because i liked BF1942, and BF2 a lot. I bought those titles BECAUSE of the modding community.

      By the time BF3 came along, i started boycotting EA for their abusive DRM. Incidentally, about that time dice removed the cd check from the older BF titles.

      I'd rather play the older titles than touch BF3. Same with Simcity, v4 is good and with mods its even better.

      Valve encourage mods while EA forbids them. Guess where my purchases go? EA is finished for me.

      Both BF1942 and BF2 had excellent Star Wars mods, which i spent countless hours playing with. Prettier graphics mean nothing if bad gameplay and DRM comes to ruin it all.

      I get bored quickly with stock maps, no matter the game. It is the modding community what makes a purchase truly worth it, and the more mods the better. When they said people were not allowed to mod BF3, i didn't want nothing with it, to this day.

      I think the original Dice people should go independent with crowd-funding. In fact, anyone who is worth their talent should have left EA long ago.

      And no, a franchise/trademark, no matter its value, doesn't make a good game. You can fool some people at first, like they did with Simcity 5, only to find out how bad it turned out; then simple word of mouth will destroy the millions spent in marketing.

      EA is probably beyond repair at this point, they can't allow original ideas or talented people "because its risky". All they do is repeat and repeat, while adding idiotic DRM annoyances in the way. Not like Disney is any better...

      --
      Artix
      Your Linux, your init.
    2. Re:Ongoing boycott by CmdrEdem · · Score: 1

      I know better than say that EA is beyond salvation. But that they did some pretty shitty stuff in the past that they did. They destroyed studios` identities changing their names. They use Bioware`s name in anything new they do because they know Bioware has a good reputation.

      I have no idea if they will change but one can hope. EA may star at Empire Strikes Back or A New Hope. For now I`m betting the empire will kick gamers` all around the globe pretty soon.

      --
      This combination doesn`t exist: ETIs that know about humanity and want to see us dead. Otherwise we wouldn't exist.
    3. Re:Ongoing boycott by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      They don't use Bioware's name in anything.

      Other than the mediocre Old Republic, they've only done Mass Effect and Dragon Age since 2008.

      Nothing else has their name on it.

    4. Re:Ongoing boycott by CmdrEdem · · Score: 1

      The new Command and Conquer is being made on a studio called Bioware Victory.

      --
      This combination doesn`t exist: ETIs that know about humanity and want to see us dead. Otherwise we wouldn't exist.
  20. EA this is your only hope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every one hates you, you have nothing but bad PR with the geek segment.

    Do a good job, make a great tie fight /x wing game. Don't DRM it to death, stay true to the source, adult but not gratuitous. hire some good screen writers.

        Don't attempt to micro transition it to death. Think more season pass more campaigns new ships for 20 bucks a year if you must have that to sell to the overlords. Sell on the fact that this is a great PR move, that for 1 great nostalgic game fans will forgive forget a bunch or well idiot ones.

    Get old pc gamers to say " It was like playing the old game, updated but with that same feel" and you will have 75% of the people that want to split you an roast you like a pig, trampling over themselves thanking you.

  21. The death of Lucas Arts wasn't painful enough... by celest · · Score: 2

    Because the death of Lucas Arts wasn't painful enough for Star Wars fans, we can now look forward to all future Star Wars games being in the Origin-only, Rootkit-DRM enabled, online-at-all-times failboat that is EA's formula. Or is my lack of faith disturbing?

  22. two wrongs dont make a right by zlives · · Score: 1

    Always two there are, no more, no less. A master and an apprentice.
    But which is EA, the master or the apprentice

    1. Re:two wrongs dont make a right by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 3

      Apprentice. Disney was the primary advocate and beneficiary of the Sonny Bono Act.

  23. Bad Call Disney by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

    Don't the derps in charge of making these arrangements keep up on things. You just signed a deal with a company where just a few weeks back, gamers were practically dancing in the streets over their financial woes due to EA's douchebaggery.

    Are you sure you want to go through with this foolishness?

    --
    This space unintentionally left blank.
  24. xwing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Say goodbye to modding any star wars games, and hello to paying through the nose for DLC.

    Oh well. I just hope they re-make X-Wing.

    1. Re:xwing? by Ashenkase · · Score: 1

      hear HEAR!

  25. Losing optimism on Disney and Star Wars... by runeghost · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a casual Star Wars fan, I've tried to stay upbeat about the sale of Star Wars to Disney. After all, as my friends and I keep telling each other, "It can't actually be worse than the prequels, right?" But I've watched announcement after announcement with trepidation. J.J. Abrams directing? Clone Wars unceremoniously canceled and the people making it let go? Now the universally-loathed EA is to be in charge of the gaming wing of the franchise? (I'm expecting Disney to cancel Dark Horse's comics license as soon as they legally can, if not sooner.) Star Wars has had a great many ups and downs over the years, but there have been some amazing stories along the way. I fear that the Mouse is going to steamroller that whole universe into bland commercialism for the rest of my life.

    1. Re:Losing optimism on Disney and Star Wars... by inputdev · · Score: 1

      I'm with you on every point except J.J. Abrams - I think he is great. Granted, I was a fan of Lost.

    2. Re:Losing optimism on Disney and Star Wars... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      I like the guy too, didn't even mind the end of Lost or his ridiculous love for CGI lens flare. But having him direct both star wars and star trek is just wrong - and I don't even have a dog in the star wars/trek fight, still feels bad. It is time for a new set of mythos all around.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:Losing optimism on Disney and Star Wars... by wbr1 · · Score: 1

      ...It is time for a new set of mythos all around.

      Starship Troopers? 8-)

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    4. Re:Losing optimism on Disney and Star Wars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ah well there is allways Lego Starwars , the most under rated version of the film trilogy there ever was .

    5. Re:Losing optimism on Disney and Star Wars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Would you like to know more?

    6. Re:Losing optimism on Disney and Star Wars... by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      I would love for a Starship Troopers reboot that was more true to the book. I mean, they even had the nerve to call them "cap troopers" in the movie when they rode down on boats. And of course there was the whole lack of powered armor thing.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    7. Re:Losing optimism on Disney and Star Wars... by kimvette · · Score: 1

      > J.J. Abrams directing?

      Expect plenty of superfluous lens flare (thank you pointless CGI!) even in dark scenes.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    8. Re:Losing optimism on Disney and Star Wars... by firex726 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget they have already said they want to release a new Star Wars movie every year. Got a feeling it'll be the Call of Duty for movies.

    9. Re:Losing optimism on Disney and Star Wars... by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

      And this, too, can be laid at George Lucas's doorstep....

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
  26. Totally predictable Disney move. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this really a surprise to anyone at this point? Disney bought SW and then announced that, with the help of Metamucil, Golytely, and plenty of fiber, were going to shit out at one movie a year. Since they obviously are hoping to milk the franchise fans for all they are worth, why not then partner with the video game maker whose sole mission is to milk fans for all they're worth as well?

    It's a perfect match made in hell.

  27. SW Games Made By The Empire by earcaraxe · · Score: 1

    Finally they've found a developer that's as evil as the Empire to make the games.

  28. Who cares? by Animats · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Who cares? This franchise is way past its sell-by date.

    Looking forward to the new Honor Harrington movie.

    1. Re:Who cares? by runeghost · · Score: 1

      I prefer the original. It has the added advantage of being already out. :-) (I wouldn't say no to more quality HH though.)

    2. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the two sound frighteningly similar

    3. Re:Who cares? by jbonomi · · Score: 1

      It really did sound like a perfect description of Star Wars. Seriously, Star Wars is dead. Let it be dead.

  29. It's dead. by steelfood · · Score: 1

    Lucas's legacy that is.

    One can argue that it died with the making of episodes 1-3 and George Lucas' monetization push of the past ten or so years, but I think this is the last nail in the coffin. All that's left is the dissolution of ILM, and that will sound like dirt hitting wood.

    How to ruin a good thing: sell it to Disney. I don't expect quality offerings from Pixar anymore either, especially after the atrocity that was Brave.

    --
    "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    1. Re:It's dead. by wbr1 · · Score: 1

      Lukas' legacy died with willow.

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
  30. EA Is the Game Company Disney Was Looking For by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bwhahahahahahahahahaha....

    fitler is lameness

  31. Good as dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you liked any star wars games call them dead if EA is taking them over. They will ruin them just like they did with Nascar Racing. Last good Nascar game was 2003 when Papyrus was still around. EA bought the rights, released one version and it sucked. Hasn't released anything in years.

  32. Star Force by tepples · · Score: 1

    Farewell Star Wars games, may the force be with you. And I`m not talking about Starforce.

    I don't get it. What does a vertical shooter by Tecmo have to do with Star Wars or EA?

    1. Re:Star Force by Tyrion+Moath · · Score: 2

      I don't get it. What does a vertical shooter by Tecmo have to do with Star Wars or EA?

      Wrong Starforce. He meant the one that destroys your CD drive.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/StarForce

    2. Re:Star Force by CmdrEdem · · Score: 1

      Other Starforce mate. Here, this is the Starforce I meant.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/StarForce

      --
      This combination doesn`t exist: ETIs that know about humanity and want to see us dead. Otherwise we wouldn't exist.
  33. over-saturation of brand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once upon a time, I remember Disney used to (maybe still? haven't paid attention) do things like rotate out the availability of its classic cartoon movies in order to retain value through scarcity.

    Now, they're going to over-saturate the market with Star Wars games 'cause they're way too eager to get their money back from their new acquisition.

    Get ready for Angry Ewoks on the mobile side, and Lara Skywalker on the pc / console side.

  34. EA's fumble with Scrabble -- Star Wars by SethJohnson · · Score: 1

    As EA has done with so many properties it contracts for, they completely devalued the game of Scrabble with their horrible port. With that example as a predictor of what they'll do with the Star Wars property, we can look forward to seeing a third party's massive success marketing "Laser Swords with Friends" across FaceBook and iOS.

  35. Electronic Farts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One game in and Disney will be pulling a Job Bluth... "I've made a huge mistake." EA is a garbage company full of sell out developers.

  36. Lol by Dishevel · · Score: 1

    lol
    That is all.
    Really.

    --
    Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  37. There's a sucker born every day by dark_glaive · · Score: 0

    Hey suckers, find a new franchise to jerk off to.

  38. Misread the summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone else read "EA will create & publish Star Wars games" as "EA will create & punish Star Wars gamers"?

  39. Mmmm by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    In that shit sandwich, EA would just be the poo cherry topping.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  40. Bioware by r0kk3rz · · Score: 1

    The only good news out of all of this is the possibillity of new Bioware KOTOR games

    1. Re:Bioware by Issarlk · · Score: 1

      Yes, and they should probably be as good as Episode 1-3 were compared to 4-6! A great day for SW fans indeed.

    2. Re:Bioware by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      EA is still pissed at Bioware for the TOR mess. Don't expect them to greenlight anything with "The Old Republic" in the title anytime soon, especially from Bioware.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
  41. Re:"See Jeremiah Cornelius troll run (forrest, run by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 0

    Lol! You can not defeat all of my incarnations!

  42. It's GOB by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 1

    It's GOB, as in George Oscar Bluth Jr.

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
  43. I think this is a great move. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The games will be so bad they'll make the terrible movies look not completely awful.

  44. Bunch of negative neck beards in this thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You guys all sound like you need Prozac.

  45. Oh, look! by jnork · · Score: 1

    ... More stuff for me to ignore from EA, aside from mocking them.

    --
    Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.
  46. *cries* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No more star wars for me...

  47. makes me want to call and ask to drop disney chann by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    makes me want to call and ask to drop disney channel and maybe ESPN.

  48. X-Wing or TIE Fighter game, please by BTWR · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's all I want, not another Star Wars: Battlefront game. KOTOR was great, but I don't need another one. XW and TF were 2 of the greatest games ever made. X-Wing vs. TIE Fighter was a letdown and X-Wing Alliance, while good, wasn't as good as its predecessors.

    1. Re:X-Wing or TIE Fighter game, please by Loligo · · Score: 1

      Amen to this.

      The only downside would be having to buy a joystick again. I haven't needed one in years, but a new X-Wing or TIE Fighter would change that.

    2. Re:X-Wing or TIE Fighter game, please by fedesl · · Score: 1

      Exactly!! I would even go as far as buying an EA game if they make a new X-Wing. I personally liked much more X-Wing vs Tie Fighter over X-Wing Alliance. XWA had too many of the "family" missions aboard that pseudo-Millenium Falcon which I didn't really enjoy, and up to this day I can't get that annoying mettallic voice of Emkay out of my head,

    3. Re:X-Wing or TIE Fighter game, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      X-Wing vs. TIE Fighter was awesome for its multiplayer campaigns and stuff. Way ahead of its time. Way.

      There was no story though, no ship to wander around in, no medals to look at, none of the cool briefings hosted by Admiral Ackbar (ITS A TRAP).

      Give us X-Wing, or so help me god, one day when I have money, I will re-make it in all its current/next-gen glory in secret under a pseudoname, and release it to the public for free via piratebay.

      Don't temp fate Disney.

  49. Lens flare ^ 2 by dstyle5 · · Score: 2

    Given the supernova suns DICE implemented in Battlefield 3 plus J.J. working on the next Star Wars movie, the DICE Star Wars game is going to require sunglasses to play. If you want to save your eyesight, that is.

    1. Re:Lens flare ^ 2 by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      Yet people still complain that 3D movies are too dark because of having to wear the Polaroids!

    2. Re:Lens flare ^ 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given the supernova suns DICE implemented in Battlefield 3 plus J.J. working on the next Star Wars movie, the DICE Star Wars game is going to require sunglasses to play. If you want to save your eyesight, that is.

      Blast Shields.

    3. Re:Lens flare ^ 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean Tactical Operator Vision Anti-Radiation Integrated Shades for Combat Hostilities?

      I'm sorry, I started with a silly operator acronym and ended up humming the Internationale, it happens sometimes.

  50. So ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... presumably "core gaming audience" is some sort of code for "people who wouldn't know a decent game if it bit them on the arse".

    And, yes, it's spelt "arse", none of that confusing it with donkey-type critters that you yanks seem so fond of :-)

    And, yes, it's spelt "spelt", despite what the stupid spelling checker thinks :-)

  51. EA is the game company by alteveer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...that Disney deserves.

    1. Re:EA is the game company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, this is a match made in heaven. Now they can compete with each other on who fails hardest.

  52. the day star wars gaming died by smash · · Score: 1

    RIP

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  53. It's okay guys by Satanboy · · Score: 1

    There hasn't been a good game out of Lucas Arts in years. SWTOR was a crapfest and nothing else came from them in recent memory that was remotely good. EA will create more craptastic star wars tie ins while watering down the brand and it will be like star trek games, they always come close but never really do it right.

  54. Oh Well by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    I guess Star Wars games had to suck eventually.

  55. My message to EA and Disney ... by ScaledLizard · · Score: 1

    "These are not the droids you are looking for."

  56. Guaranteeing that all Star Wars by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

    For the foreseeable future will be absolute crap.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  57. I can hear the Wilhelm Scream by fox171171 · · Score: 1
    1. Re:I can hear the Wilhelm Scream by turp182 · · Score: 1

      That's very interesting, I'd never heard of it before and it's fascinating how often it has been used.

      But for the particular news, I believe this scream is more relevant:
      http://nooooooooooooooo.com/

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
  58. Re:Jeremiah Cornelius sockpuppet by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 0

    Wooohooo crazy on the hook now, going to reel you in...

    Give it up, Jesus Christ commands you!

    Yes, that's right.

    JC = Jeremiah Cornelius
    JC = Jherek Carnelian
    JC = Jesus Christ

    You can not win!!!

  59. Torn... by loneDreamer · · Score: 1


    Did EA decide they were innovating too much already and wanted to go for a beaten-up franchise?
    Did they felt envious of the one franchise that had more sequels than Madden?

  60. Sigh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another gaming franchise I will not be able to play because of EA's Origin crap. :(

  61. Re:makes me want to call and ask to drop disney ch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But then you'd miss Gravity Falls which pretty good.

  62. Star Wars had to die. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, come on!

    The whole story is about how great it is to fight the Evil Empire.

    Clone Wars was largely about showing the inner workings of state corruption.

    The Dark Side had to step in...

    1. Melt Lucas' brain.
    2. Seed corruption in the franchise. Over-sell it and annoy its once VERY enthusiastic fan base.
    3. Give it to Disney and Fucking Abrams, two entities which are fully in bed with the US Empire and its goals. (Abrams is pro-torture ffs. Have you seen Alias?

    Star Wars, if played right, could have had a very positive impact on the direction of global American policy and the awareness level of its population.

    It absolutely had to be destroyed. And now that has happened. Threat extinguished.

    Star Trek, another piece of once extremely positive culture, has also been given the same treatment. It now serves the Empire.

    Up next: Superman.

  63. One Word: SimCity by patchouly · · Score: 1

    Clearly they didn't check to see how fans felt about EA. I mean, they did such a fantastic job with their latest release of SimCity!

    1. Re:One Word: SimCity by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      All Disney needed to see was how many zeroes were on the check that EA wrote.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
  64. Obligatory Penny Arcade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2006/03/01

  65. Motorola smartphone games? by Ken_g6 · · Score: 1

    Will EA develop games for Motorola smartphones?

    Or are those not the Droids Disney is looking for?

    --
    (T>t && O(n)--) == sqrt(666)
  66. The only response... by BobSutan · · Score: 1

    NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!

    Seriously though, this a huge disappointment.

    --
    "On a scale from 1 to 10, people are stupid"
  67. Re:Jeremiah Cornelius admits trolling by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 0

    Especially important is the warning to avoid conversations with the demon. We may ask what is relevant but anything beyond that is dangerous. He is a liar. The demon is a liar. He will lie to confuse us. But he will also mix lies with the truth to attack us. The attack is psychological, Damien, and powerful. So don't listen to him. Remember that - do not listen.

    I cast you out, unclean spirit!

    It's the power of Christ! The power of Christ compels you!

  68. You people confuse me... by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

    Ok, it's on the title, you are asking why Disney got with EA. But when you post stuff with such generic terms, it's hard to discover that you are not talking about EA going with Disney.

  69. Re:The death of Lucas Arts wasn't painful enough.. by fallen1 · · Score: 1

    I find your lack of faith ... spot fucking on! This decision is the first Disney has made with respect to the new companies it has acquired that is a major mistake. And I am by _NO_ means a Disney fan. I'd like to see the company die on the vine - or at least lose all patent/copyright protections after the original 17 year period those works were created under.

    --

    Dream as if you'll live forever.
    Live as if you'll die tomorrow.
    ~Anonymous~

  70. Company voted 'worst company in America'? by wolfing · · Score: 1

    So I guess I'll have to be online to play any new Star Wars single player game and call it a 'feature'.

  71. John Riccitiello is Darth Plagueis by Kildjean · · Score: 1

    Palpatine said...

    This isn't a story EA would tell you.... It's a Sith legend.

    "Darth Riccitiello was a Dark Lord of the Sith so powerful and so wise, he could use EA to influence the midi-chlorians to make...games. He had such a knowledge of the Dark Side, he could even keep the game studios he cared about...from dying.

    He became so powerful, the only thing he was afraid of was losing his power...which, eventually of course, he did. Unfortunately, he taught his apprentice (who works for Disney) everything he knew. Then his apprentice killed him in his sleep. Riccitiello never saw it coming.

    Ironic."

    True Story...

    --
    Nom de dieu de putain de bordel de merde de saloperie de connard d encule de ta mere.
  72. Here we go again by Nov8tr · · Score: 0

    EA and Hitler would have gotten along great. Both hated by most of the planet. :(

    --
    I'm old, not dead. Well that's my 2 cents worth, your mileage may vary. I say what I think, not what you want to hear.
  73. Give them a chance... by wadej64 · · Score: 1

    If the developers of Battlefield, Dead Space, and Mass Effect are creating the new Star wars games, then theres no way it could end up all that bad. These guys created some of the most successful games to date. just because they are working under EA and Disney doesn't mean these new games will be any different.

  74. Re:"Satan get thee behind me" Jeremiah Cornelius by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 0

    Dude you are insane. There is no point in arguing with an insane person, but look at that page you keep posting that you think is evidence...

    All the links have [hostname.com] on them. That means JC cut-n-pasted from the post he was responding to. The real spammer has the original text and never doubles up the [hostname.com] stuff. Go and look at all the other posts of that same junk, they are all different.

    I'm sure you'll take it as proof of your conspiracies, but I had to give you a chance.

  75. Re:"Satan get thee behind me" Jeremiah Cornelius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, I'm the "real spammer" and I don't think it is funny at all!!!
    Who are you to impersonate me?

  76. They Paid a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $100,000,000 for the rights.

  77. Re:"Satan get thee behind me" Jeremiah Cornelius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure what kind of proof I can offer, but here's a screenshot of my apk folder with timestamps going back to August around the time the fun started.

  78. "This is not the DRM server you were looking for." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do hope that EA replaces the "There Is A Problem With Your Connection" error with that one for this game. It has always amused me how EA and DICE deftly focused their own failings back upon the user with that message. Buyers of this game will be sure to see it, too, as EA will certainly play it's usual "shave off 40% of the suckers by taking their money and then locking them out of the game until they give up trying to play it" ruse.

    If they were an automaker, EA would be whomever designed the Trabant.

  79. Re:"Satan get thee behind me" Jeremiah Cornelius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, that looks very convincing. We can both be "the real spammer" our name is legion!!!!

  80. I'm OK with this by captjc · · Score: 1

    I agree. You can say what you want about Origin, DRM, constant DLC, running franchises into the ground with uninspired sequels, and any of a thousand other reasons to hate EA, but at the end of the day Bioware, DICE, and Visceral Games are all very competent developers that know how to make very solid and fairly polished games. I dislike EA as much as the next gamer (OK, maybe not as EA has so many rabid anti-fanboys) and while I would love to see any other publisher get the Star Wars license, these guys are hardly anywhere close to the worst choice. At least with Bioware, DICE, and Visceral we know it isn't going to be some child-friendly schlock and while it probably won't be the best games ever made, it should still be some solid and fun entertainment.

    It could be worse, it could have been Ubisoft!

    --
    Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
  81. Re:Jeremiah Cornelius = Jherek Carnelian by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

    Fuck off APK, take your off-topic stalking somewhere else. Nobody cares what you think JC did and you've been told plenty of times that we are sick of your sniveling.

    Post something on-topic or go away.

    --
    ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
  82. Re:Jeremiah Cornelius = Jherek Carnelian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously Sakurafish86 is one of Jonathan Coulton's many sockpuppets.

  83. Re:Jeremiah Cornelius = Jherek Carnelian by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

    Obviously Sakurafish86 is one of Jonathan Coulton's many sockpuppets.

    It's like talking to an autistic six year-old except without that level of sophistication.

    Here's a sure-fire way to avoid getting trolled, APK: stop behaving like an arsehole. Try it on for size. Even if it doesn't do what says on the tin, the rest of us will get some peace for a while.

    --
    ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
  84. Why don't you take your own advice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You care since I burnt you here & you ran http://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2579684&cid=38415680

    * :)

    (Funniest part is, I can literally show around another 40 or so links showing much the same on many topics I utterly scorched your technically weak ass on, lol!)

    APK

  85. Re:"Satan get thee behind me" Jeremiah Cornelius by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 0

    It breaks my heart that you use Windows.

    Reposting yours - to get visibility above 0 - grew me this little "tail". He mod bombs everything I post, too.

    I think it's damned_registrars. Unless YOU are damned_registrars...

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  86. Re:Running from a SIMPLE question? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 0

    I fart on your mother's eyeball.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  87. Re:"Satan get thee behind me" Jeremiah Cornelius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use Cygwin if that counts for anything.

  88. Re:"Satan get thee behind me" Jeremiah Cornelius by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    Of course.

    I used Cygwin the whole time I was at M$... And I used Interix/SFU/SUA or whatever they called it, after there was a whole Deb distro ported.

    https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=274

    http://debian-interix.net/

    Looks like the Deb stopped updating in 2009. I would have been using it until 2010. It worked, with a XMingX server - which I preferred over CygwinX.
    http://www.straightrunning.com/XmingNotes/

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  89. POOP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow...worst news ever.....now star wars games are doomed....DOOMED!

  90. EA?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want a game to be good use UK game developers......... get ready for amazing marketing campaigns and disappointing user experiences

  91. In a galaxy far, far away... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I couldn't play Star Wars because of EA's DRM...

  92. cheap jordan shoes jordan shoes wholesale handbag by koanoiuv · · Score: 1

    YOU MUST NOT MISS IT! The website cheap wholesale and retail for many kinds of fashion shoes, like the nike,jordan, also including the handbags,sunglasses,jeans,shirts,hat,belt and the watch, All the products are free shipping, and the price is competitive, after the payment, can ship within short time. the goods are shipping by air express, such as EMS,DHL,the shipping time is in 5-7 business days! http://www.sport3trade.net/ cheap jordan for $40, Air Max 90 for $41, air shox for $40, best handbags for $39, Sunglasses for $18, wallet for $19, belt for $18, T-shirts for $20, Jeans for $39, NFL/MLB/NBA jersey for $25, Top Rolex watch,jordan for cheap, http://www.sport3trade.net/

  93. Great by sincere230 · · Score: 1

    Great Thanks dear for posting the story