We've had multi-level threads, in elm and mutt for decades now.
Gmail gives you one thread per conversation but not real threads -- mutt for instance gives you as many threads as there really are, ie two replies to mail #1, each spawns a new thread both linked to the first one. Just like outlook.
Even IMDB or slashdot discussion boards ahve better threading than gmail threads.
Also with gmail how do I get to a non-threaded mode? For all my mail?
Or use threading by reply-to rather than by subject so that when someone changes the subject it doesn't start a new thread?
For a long time user of mutt, gmail is pretty much unusable. yahoo and hotmail and the rest are just abominations in terms of UI.
That election breakdown is bogus. When the IQ of a _diverse_ population (for eg, a state) averages significantly far from 100, in this case from 85 to 115, alarm bells should ring.
A simple google search reveals that this stuff was first posted after Bush/Gore and is modified for Bush/Kerry : "The person responsible for the hoax appears to be a guy named Robert Calvert who posted the data to a Mensa newsgroup back in 2002. Presumably he did make the data up."
And this: http://www.sq.4mg.com/stateIQ-income.htm has more realistic IQ figures (and 2003 salaries), ranging between a more believable 94 and 104.
That election breakdown is bogus. When the IQ of a _diverse_ population (for eg, a state) averages significantly far from 100, in this case from 85 to 115, alarm bells should ring.
A simple google search reveals that this stuff was first posted after Bush/Gore and is modified for Bush/Kerry :
"The person responsible for the hoax appears to be a guy named Robert Calvert who posted the data to a Mensa newsgroup back in 2002. Presumably he did make the data up."
And this:
http://www.sq.4mg.com/stateIQ-income.htm has more realistic IQ figures (and 2003 salaries), ranging between a more believable 94 and 104.
--
One should always keep an open mind, but not so open that one's brains fall out. --Bertrand Russell
>> - This CD, - I stammered, - How, how on earth did it come to me?
Oh that's simple, the good wizards at AOL had to hide it at the end of the anti-trust war and fearing what it would do to them, they mixed it with their millions of 1000 Free Hours Version 7.0 disks which no-one should have opened anyway..
>We could add something like (not real numbers):
>>>> MAIL From: 250... Sender untrusted, please
>give prime factor of 34576184516935692342934759132
>to continue
>Personally, I do not know the feasibility of this
>angle, although I am sure some expert with be
>willing to point out the flaws.
Flaws like the fact that 2 suffices in the example? Too good to pass up:)
Slashdot Mirror
use noscript plugin with firefox.
We've had multi-level threads, in elm and mutt for decades now. Gmail gives you one thread per conversation but not real threads -- mutt for instance gives you as many threads as there really are, ie two replies to mail #1, each spawns a new thread both linked to the first one. Just like outlook. Even IMDB or slashdot discussion boards ahve better threading than gmail threads. Also with gmail how do I get to a non-threaded mode? For all my mail? Or use threading by reply-to rather than by subject so that when someone changes the subject it doesn't start a new thread? For a long time user of mutt, gmail is pretty much unusable. yahoo and hotmail and the rest are just abominations in terms of UI.
> According to Google:
> 1 year = 52.177457 weeks
You need google to say that?
That election breakdown is bogus. When the IQ of a _diverse_ population (for eg, a state) averages significantly far from 100, in this case from 85 to 115, alarm bells should ring.
A simple google search reveals that this stuff was first posted after Bush/Gore and is modified for Bush/Kerry : "The person responsible for the hoax appears to be a guy named Robert Calvert who posted the data to a Mensa newsgroup back in 2002. Presumably he did make the data up."
And this: http://www.sq.4mg.com/stateIQ-income.htm has more realistic IQ figures (and 2003 salaries), ranging between a more believable 94 and 104.
That election breakdown is bogus. When the IQ of a _diverse_ population (for eg, a state) averages significantly far from 100, in this case from 85 to 115, alarm bells should ring. A simple google search reveals that this stuff was first posted after Bush/Gore and is modified for Bush/Kerry : "The person responsible for the hoax appears to be a guy named Robert Calvert who posted the data to a Mensa newsgroup back in 2002. Presumably he did make the data up." And this: http://www.sq.4mg.com/stateIQ-income.htm has more realistic IQ figures (and 2003 salaries), ranging between a more believable 94 and 104. -- One should always keep an open mind, but not so open that one's brains fall out. --Bertrand Russell
However, putting everything in lower case is a BAD idea. There is a reason why punctuation exists...
Oh that's simple, the good wizards at AOL had to hide it at the end of the anti-trust war and fearing what it would do to them, they mixed it with their millions of 1000 Free Hours Version 7.0 disks which no-one should have opened anyway..
> Did I miss anything? Umm.. How about : Dumb list summarising all possible respon.. Oh wait, forget it..
>We could add something like (not real numbers): ... Sender untrusted, please
:)
>>>> MAIL From: 250
>give prime factor of 34576184516935692342934759132
>to continue
>Personally, I do not know the feasibility of this
>angle, although I am sure some expert with be
>willing to point out the flaws.
Flaws like the fact that 2 suffices in the example? Too good to pass up