Did you actually read what the OP wrote? IPsec to home office. NO PUBLIC INTERNET. NOTHING IN THE BITTORRENT SPEC WILL HELP because all the bittorrent traffic *still has to come home* to go back out.
The easiest way is just to script a push out to the individual stores.
Explain to me how bit torrent is going to help his home office wan traffic congestion?!
Please, think of the PFYs. His DR fileset is only 4Gigs. My pr0n is bigger than that. ASCII/text pr0n!
Others have already given him the best solution for his case - DVDs. Overnight them, and he is done. Latency may be a bit much, but not that much more than doing it over DSL or dialup.
What has that got to do with anything? If that's the case, the files that are currently pushed out to DR still has to be executed manually or automagically.
The OP is not asking for that - the OP wants the files to be transferred automagically. A DVD works perfectly fine, just has high latency.
The story goes like this - Hershey was making chocolates, and found them too tasty. He was worried that his customers would get too addicted to them (obviously not an American capitalist pig!) so he added souring agents to the chocolate.
Now, Americans are used to, and expect that vomit taste in their chocolate.
You are a mucking foron. As KDE has stated numerous times, KDE 4.0 was not for end users, but was a framework for application people to work towards. Otherwise, application developers will still have to develop to a 3.x framework.
It's all due to the damned PHP people. Remember PHP, the programming language designed specifically for people who can't program? Yeah, that one. That's why they like to use MySQL, also designed specifically for people who do not understand databases and ACID compliance
And after I did RTFA (which it doesn't actually link too, it links to a link) there is nothing in there to really imply that she IS innocent. No denial of the charges nor claim of innocence.
You should go ask for your money back from all your reading lessons as you appeared to have missed the part when she said it was her father who opened the account in her name, at another address. She just made a statement that can be easily proven or disproven, and if proven, shows that she is innocent.
Being pedantic just means stating the obvious. You are being stupid. If the court system says that you're innocent until proven guilty, then you are *INNOCENT* to start with, until the court finds you guilty. There's no "we should treat her as guilty or we should not treat her as guilty".
Are you new to this? Were you born yesterday? RIAA have been doing this stupid thing for years, and their dirty immoral tactics have been well documented. The fact is that THEY ARE NOT FOLLOWING PROPER PROTOCOL!
I was really surprised to see your preemptive strike against those damned Mucking Forons, but it appears that it was necessary, and and they still came anyway.
WTF are you smoking, and WTF are those who modded you insightful smoking?!
Or maybe by someone who wants to save us from Apple's ridiculous and limiting EULA shrinkwrap nonsense.
What kind of dumbass are you? The shrinkwrap EULA stays the same whether you get OSX with an Apple or a "compatible" piece of hardware. How does that save you from Apple's EULA?!
>Should they win, those companies get a new product to sell in a market clamoring for Apple stuff.
That's true, but we also get a whole hell of a lot more consumer rights. Imagine being able to return software for a refund! Or running the software you paid for on anything you like. Or selling it. You know, the basic consumer rights we take for granted for everything except software.
Again, WTF ARE YOU SMOKING?! If you don't want an OSX system, don't buy an Apple. You have already indicated that you prefer a typical PC, than an Apple branded one. WHY WOULD YOU BUY AN APPLE BRANDED PC THEN IF YOU DON'T WANT OSX?!
If you *DO* want OSX, then you don't get to return the software since you need that license.
Freedom to tinker and freedom to use is bigger than Apple. Much bigger.
Apparently, in your case, it also provides freedom from thinking. And those stupid modders too.
OK, I read the entire thread. As I did so, I realized that it looked familar. I think that I read the whole thing a year ago in response to an earlier posting here. It struck me then as a tempest in a teapot. It still does.
Of course. It's not the end of the free world. However, in the Free Software world, or in the Open Source world, people who are supposed to give a shit about principles, apparently do not. And couldn't understand why other people feel pissed off.
And who the fuck's talking about legal standing? For some reason, you seem to live in the world where the only thing that matters is a lawsuit.
Slashdot Mirror
Did you actually read what the OP wrote? IPsec to home office. NO PUBLIC INTERNET. NOTHING IN THE BITTORRENT SPEC WILL HELP because all the bittorrent traffic *still has to come home* to go back out.
The easiest way is just to script a push out to the individual stores.
Explain to me how bit torrent is going to help his home office wan traffic congestion?!
Please, think of the PFYs. His DR fileset is only 4Gigs. My pr0n is bigger than that. ASCII/text pr0n!
Others have already given him the best solution for his case - DVDs. Overnight them, and he is done. Latency may be a bit much, but not that much more than doing it over DSL or dialup.
Now, lets go back to discussing OT stuff.
What has that got to do with anything? If that's the case, the files that are currently pushed out to DR still has to be executed manually or automagically.
The OP is not asking for that - the OP wants the files to be transferred automagically. A DVD works perfectly fine, just has high latency.
It really depends on what options you turn on.
And in some places, Liberal is a 4 letter word
The story goes like this - Hershey was making chocolates, and found them too tasty. He was worried that his customers would get too addicted to them (obviously not an American capitalist pig!) so he added souring agents to the chocolate.
Now, Americans are used to, and expect that vomit taste in their chocolate.
You are a mucking foron. As KDE has stated numerous times, KDE 4.0 was not for end users, but was a framework for application people to work towards. Otherwise, application developers will still have to develop to a 3.x framework.
Please stop being a Mucking Foron. Thanks.
Who makes SQL/Server?
You've never used Microsoft software? Which island do you live on, and when can I visit?
Obviously they just cloned the developer and made them the QA team.
What I'm more interested in is the cloning technology! Let the clone wars begin!
Of course not. Per a recent thread, you also have to include an Easter Egg or two to be a REAL software engineer.
It's all due to the damned PHP people. Remember PHP, the programming language designed specifically for people who can't program? Yeah, that one. That's why they like to use MySQL, also designed specifically for people who do not understand databases and ACID compliance
And after I did RTFA (which it doesn't actually link too, it links to a link) there is nothing in there to really imply that she IS innocent. No denial of the charges nor claim of innocence.
You should go ask for your money back from all your reading lessons as you appeared to have missed the part when she said it was her father who opened the account in her name, at another address. She just made a statement that can be easily proven or disproven, and if proven, shows that she is innocent.
Being pedantic just means stating the obvious. You are being stupid. If the court system says that you're innocent until proven guilty, then you are *INNOCENT* to start with, until the court finds you guilty. There's no "we should treat her as guilty or we should not treat her as guilty".
Who the fuck was the modder who modded you insightful? Can you please RTFA before commenting out of your ass?
Mucking Foron
Sure. Just call the Make A Wish Foundation.
You are a Royal Mucking Foron
Why the fuck is the presumption that she pirated crap? Where is the innocent until proven guilty? Just because RIAA says she is guilty, then she is?
You are a Class 1 Mucking Foron
Are you new to this? Were you born yesterday? RIAA have been doing this stupid thing for years, and their dirty immoral tactics have been well documented. The fact is that THEY ARE NOT FOLLOWING PROPER PROTOCOL!
Yet another Mucking Foron
Can you stop being a Mucking Foron for a minute, and go READ THE FUCKING ARTICLE?
I was really surprised to see your preemptive strike against those damned Mucking Forons, but it appears that it was necessary, and and they still came anyway.
Which part of "she is not guilty, RTFA" you do not get?
Mucking Foron
WTF are you smoking, and WTF are those who modded you insightful smoking?!
Or maybe by someone who wants to save us from Apple's ridiculous and limiting EULA shrinkwrap nonsense.
What kind of dumbass are you? The shrinkwrap EULA stays the same whether you get OSX with an Apple or a "compatible" piece of hardware. How does that save you from Apple's EULA?!
>Should they win, those companies get a new product to sell in a market clamoring for Apple stuff.
That's true, but we also get a whole hell of a lot more consumer rights. Imagine being able to return software for a refund! Or running the software you paid for on anything you like. Or selling it. You know, the basic consumer rights we take for granted for everything except software.
Again, WTF ARE YOU SMOKING?! If you don't want an OSX system, don't buy an Apple. You have already indicated that you prefer a typical PC, than an Apple branded one. WHY WOULD YOU BUY AN APPLE BRANDED PC THEN IF YOU DON'T WANT OSX?!
If you *DO* want OSX, then you don't get to return the software since you need that license.
Freedom to tinker and freedom to use is bigger than Apple. Much bigger.
Apparently, in your case, it also provides freedom from thinking. And those stupid modders too.
Problem is that in this case, the "engine" is OSX.
Sorry, so far, all the arguments for Apple x86 clones seem to be to be people who just want a cheaper OSX box.
Apple's simply not in that market. They _can_ make and sell a cheaper x86 box if they want. They don't.
OK, I read the entire thread. As I did so, I realized that it looked familar. I think that I read the whole thing a year ago in response to an earlier posting here. It struck me then as a tempest in a teapot. It still does.
Of course. It's not the end of the free world. However, in the Free Software world, or in the Open Source world, people who are supposed to give a shit about principles, apparently do not. And couldn't understand why other people feel pissed off.
And who the fuck's talking about legal standing? For some reason, you seem to live in the world where the only thing that matters is a lawsuit.
To all the stupid mods, the truth hurts, doesn't it?