unless young people can vote online they won't bother at all and the whole democratic system will collapse
first, the democratic system has already collapsed. that's the past. second, there are not enough informed voters to make a significant amount of votes matter. all people, let alone young people, let along young people in the US, need complete and accurate information, and to understand that information, to make an informed choice. the lack of informed choice among all peoples of earth, not just the US, is the greatest threat to democracy. giving uninformed voters more access and encouraging it is not a valid way to promote democracy. if they don't have informed choice it doesn't matter how many young people go out and vote their ignorance. democracy or not people get the government they deserve.
it's a trick question. drawing any kind of line would be a declaration of their limits, and therefore an expression of some kind of ethics. clearly they have none, limits or ethics.
no. you either don't know what a web developer is or you don't know what a script kiddie is. or you don't know what the web is. maybe all three, considering you mentioned DOS batch files.
no, but as you can see from the coward below you, most java devs feel superior to web development, mostly because their tools are ill-suited for it and they need to compensate for that void in their ego. java is adequate for just about everything but web development, and that's gotta burn.
the only appropriate response to time warner cable is FUCK YOU. some of us will be saying it with our money, but it would be nice to see someone get this point across in some tangible way.
so the kinds of criminals that would know what to do with maps of infrastructure are too lazy or stupid or broke to get that information until google or apple provides it to them. would those maps make it easier for them? sure. just like a vehicle would help them getaway or a cell phone would help them communicate with each other, or a computer would help them plan a crime, or the weather channel would help them choose what day to commit a crime, etc.
haha butthurt much? did the widdle justin bieber fan get his efeewings huht? elitist asshole? you goddamn right, you and bieber can go fuck yourselves. i'm pulling your geek card, if you ever had one.
i never said he was signed. your last sentence is a good example of another bad side effect of the point i was making. there's no talent scouts anymore because they aren't looking for talent.
he didn't actually use his law degree for anything law related, he became a politician! the ability to plagiarize and not get caught until you're already in power is a highly desirable skill among politicians. he's actually displayed extraordinary competence in his field.
So for my own personal prior evidence, you're wrong.
how do i cite your anecdotal evidence? the chicago manual doesn't show how to attribute you saying "every survey I've seen" from a forum post. i really want people to believe me when i repeat what you told me over the internet.
when? when recording takes became disposable. recording used to be an expensive process that required skilled techs to splice tape and operate mixing and mastering equipment. the tape itself for high quality recordings was very expensive. this gave record labels an incentive to only sign talented acts, and then to support those acts. when recording went digital and everyone and their mother including good artists like trent reznor and shitty 'artists' like justin bieber decided to produce music in their garage, that's when it all went downhill. takes were disposable, and therefore so were the songs themselves, as well as the artists.
looks like you misread my post. i didn't misread anything:
they put all the cheaters together and then see if they cheat again, and when they do they get the ban hammer. the only way to stay in the cheaters pool, and the game itself, is to stop cheating.
neither is mine, but it makes you wonder about those who are general lackeys. i mean, if you care about other people that is. aw who am i kidding
unless young people can vote online they won't bother at all and the whole democratic system will collapse
first, the democratic system has already collapsed. that's the past. second, there are not enough informed voters to make a significant amount of votes matter. all people, let alone young people, let along young people in the US, need complete and accurate information, and to understand that information, to make an informed choice. the lack of informed choice among all peoples of earth, not just the US, is the greatest threat to democracy. giving uninformed voters more access and encouraging it is not a valid way to promote democracy. if they don't have informed choice it doesn't matter how many young people go out and vote their ignorance. democracy or not people get the government they deserve.
If I buy a DRM locked song and the seller turns off their DRM servers so I can't play it any more is that theft of my DRM locked song? YES!
it's a trick question. drawing any kind of line would be a declaration of their limits, and therefore an expression of some kind of ethics. clearly they have none, limits or ethics.
but it takes a special kind of jagoff to waste anyone's time stating the obvious like that
no. you either don't know what a web developer is or you don't know what a script kiddie is. or you don't know what the web is. maybe all three, considering you mentioned DOS batch files.
no, but as you can see from the coward below you, most java devs feel superior to web development, mostly because their tools are ill-suited for it and they need to compensate for that void in their ego. java is adequate for just about everything but web development, and that's gotta burn.
ok, so kinect then
this is for web developers. you can go back to whatever you were doing.
it allows you to write the same bloated code of 3 languages in 1 language
lmao what is this, the liar's club?
the only appropriate response to time warner cable is FUCK YOU. some of us will be saying it with our money, but it would be nice to see someone get this point across in some tangible way.
so the kinds of criminals that would know what to do with maps of infrastructure are too lazy or stupid or broke to get that information until google or apple provides it to them. would those maps make it easier for them? sure. just like a vehicle would help them getaway or a cell phone would help them communicate with each other, or a computer would help them plan a crime, or the weather channel would help them choose what day to commit a crime, etc.
haha butthurt much? did the widdle justin bieber fan get his efeewings huht? elitist asshole? you goddamn right, you and bieber can go fuck yourselves. i'm pulling your geek card, if you ever had one.
i never said he was signed. your last sentence is a good example of another bad side effect of the point i was making. there's no talent scouts anymore because they aren't looking for talent.
what about those of us who long ago realized hell is all there is and we're there now, broadcasting live -- HI MOM!!!
yeah, we're past that now. why you gotta bring up old shit?
he didn't actually use his law degree for anything law related, he became a politician! the ability to plagiarize and not get caught until you're already in power is a highly desirable skill among politicians. he's actually displayed extraordinary competence in his field.
So for my own personal prior evidence, you're wrong.
how do i cite your anecdotal evidence? the chicago manual doesn't show how to attribute you saying "every survey I've seen" from a forum post. i really want people to believe me when i repeat what you told me over the internet.
no wonder science keeps getting shittier. these banal "studies" they keep coming up with are about as useful as reality tv.
when? when recording takes became disposable. recording used to be an expensive process that required skilled techs to splice tape and operate mixing and mastering equipment. the tape itself for high quality recordings was very expensive. this gave record labels an incentive to only sign talented acts, and then to support those acts. when recording went digital and everyone and their mother including good artists like trent reznor and shitty 'artists' like justin bieber decided to produce music in their garage, that's when it all went downhill. takes were disposable, and therefore so were the songs themselves, as well as the artists.
i laughed so hard i cried. what a tard.
yeah, hackers!!! you hear that? booyah, bitches!!! sup now??
the only downside... can't smoke weed at work
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBMtl79atFs
they put all the cheaters together and then see if they cheat again, and when they do they get the ban hammer. the only way to stay in the cheaters pool, and the game itself, is to stop cheating.