Slashdot Mirror


User: Eponymous+Hero

Eponymous+Hero's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,035
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,035

  1. Re:Cue the spellcheck function on First Observational Test of the "Multiverse" · · Score: 1

    here in killer Cali it is: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/que

    was gonna 'que it up this weekend but i think we're gonna hit up the beach for some bonfires instead. hella shorties out queuein' up the boardwalk, son!

  2. Re:Whoosh on Middleboxes vs. the Internet's End-to-End Principle · · Score: 1

    AAAAAAHHHHHHHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HEHEHEHEHEHHEHEHhehehehehehehehe heheheh hehe heh. whew! that was funny! YOU, sir, are total, meaningless nonsense. the epitome of all such. does it provide meaning in your life to make "foes" on an internet forum? LMFAO!!! please don't cry, please, i don't want to have to explain this to your mother when she comes over tonight. hahahaha. fag.

    look up the word MEME, retard, and then show me anything that defines a "nothing-meme." sources i'll take are wikipedia or your own bathroom mirror. you are so convinced you can change reality if you just squeeze your sphincter tight enough. little bitch.

    whoosh is a meme! in this community! get over it! clearly thinking for yourself is what got you into this mess with me in the first place. if your brains were dynamite you couldn't blow the ass off a gnat. but hey it's not the end of the world if no one knows these stupid made-up terms you use, or that nobody gives a shit about your opinions of memes. nothing you could ever think up would ever become a meme. fuck, it wouldn't even qualify as a phage if you got bacteria to agree.

    you're gonna go fuck yourself, and you're gonna fucking like it, bitch.

  3. Re:Whoosh on Middleboxes vs. the Internet's End-to-End Principle · · Score: 1
    whoosh is the onomatopoeia that imitates the sound of the point being made flying quickly over your head.

    It may be meant by the people that posted it to mean that but they don't have total knowledge over all subjects any more than the person they blah blah blah blah

    stfu you troll. nyan (nyah)? what would really be funny is watching you finally get it.

    WARNING: after hearing the whoosh sound, some victims of ignorance such as yourself suddenly receive the epiphany they were missing, and this often triggers the "facepalm" meme. please be careful when slapping your face in recognition of your own stupidity.

  4. Re:Whoosh on Middleboxes vs. the Internet's End-to-End Principle · · Score: 1

    Whoosh!!

    whoosh means that you totally missed the point, which is why i had to whoosh you again. it is a meme, like any other in this community. for an incomplete and changing list of slashdot memes, see my sig.

  5. Re:Is renting movies online also for suckers? on Blockbuster Trying To Woo Disgruntled Netflix Customers · · Score: 1

    actually it was $free.99. 2600 magazine explained how to create your own self-validating copy of winxp about a decade ago. as i said above, i have never paid for an operating system.

  6. Re:Is renting movies online also for suckers? on Blockbuster Trying To Woo Disgruntled Netflix Customers · · Score: 1

    netflix streams movies to my cracked copy of windows xp just fine. i don't know what you're talking about. i'll test the linux assertion though. i've never tried to stream movies on my linux netbook, that's not what i use it for.

  7. Re:$200 per device for the Windows license on Blockbuster Trying To Woo Disgruntled Netflix Customers · · Score: 1

    paying for operating systems is for suckers. i never have. and no, my stone cold heart feels nothing for the poor starving microsoft execs.

    there's a dilbert for that: http://www.perturb.org/display/462_Dilbert___Unix.html

  8. but what about.... on Interviews: Ask Technologist Kevin Kelly About Everything · · Score: 1

    this sucks, i was planning on heating my home from the heat given off by servers.

    http://tech.slashdot.org/story/11/07/26/1324212/Microsoft-Suggests-Heating-Homes-With-Data-Furnaces

  9. Re:Not Iphone on iPhones Can Read Tattoo Ink For Medical Info · · Score: 1

    yes, that is correct.

  10. Re:Mark Twain... on Google+ Account Suspensions Over ToS Drawing Fire · · Score: 1

    more appropriately, orwell's face ends up on the bitcoin.

  11. Re:cheap jerseys free shipping on Ask Slashdot: Geeky Volunteer Work? · · Score: 2

    cleveland browns? that's not a spammer, that's a troll!

  12. Re:One page on Making Sense of the NoSQL Standouts · · Score: 1

    no, moron, i just haven't done any trolling in a while. i also explained in retard terms to the retard i was responding to what a mass noun is. but you knew that, nice counter-troll attempt... sooo... go fuck yourself zealot. stupid-ass starcraft reference for a handle, what an idiot. thanks for stopping by! try not to suck any dick on the way to the parking lot!

  13. Re:One page on Making Sense of the NoSQL Standouts · · Score: 1

    no, and you deserve to be put in your place for attempting to do the same with the parent.

    http://thesaurus.com/browse/less

    the 7th synonym offered for "less" is "fewer."

    less vs fewer

    fewer = things you can count. less = things that are too many to count. it is pretty easy to win this argument by stating that these ads cannot be counted, despite there being a finite number of ad space in the web page mentioned. refreshing said page will show you a different ad in the same space. at any given time there may be a finite number of ads in rotation, but throughout the course of time overall, the number of unique ads being displayed in that space is unknowable. less ads. fewer ad spaces.

    anyone can be a detail-oriented asshole if they really try, see? you're not that special. don't bother critiquing my response for grammar or spelling. i give not a fuck.

  14. Re:No rage, just a lost customer. on Netflix Deflects Rage Over Price Increase · · Score: 1

    I don't think it was a cash grab.

    Just because the content providers are doing it and Netflix has to pay their protection money to the MPAA mafia doesn't mean it's not a cash grab.

  15. Hello, Joshua on Computer Learns Language By Playing Games · · Score: 2

    Shall we play a game?

    How about Global Thermonuclear War?

  16. Re:Of course its financially feasible. on Spamming Becoming Financially Infeasible · · Score: 1

    we both misunderstood then. i am the parent, but i never claimed to not need filters because i have eyes and fingers. i claimed that my "best" filter was weeding them out myself. this was a bit of joke, since it seemed obvious (at least to me) that the only spam i'm looking at are the post-filter infiltrators. after all, filtered spam is already gone, right?

    i misunderstood you when you said you got 800 spam emails a day, but didn't qualify that as prior to filtering.

    when i say my best spam filter is myself, i'm referring to those 6-8 spam emails you get per day, which we both find acceptable.

  17. Re:Problem on Fitness Site Accidentally Shows Sexual Activity · · Score: 1

    What does having sex have to do with empathy??

    uhhh... pyschooooooooo

    don't just stay off my lawn, stay away from my daughter.

  18. non sequitur on DOJ: We Can Force You To Decrypt That Laptop · · Score: 1

    the decryption is not analogous to you unlocking your home. it's forcing someone to do the detective work for them. if police have a warrant to search my home, but can't figure out that the manuscript i'm writing has hidden messages embedded in it, i'm not obligated to point it out and translate it to them. the equivalent here is like taking an encrypted message on paper, and demanding that the accused explain what it says. the authorities have possession of the encrypted data already, that's what the warrant is for. now they want this person to incriminate themselves, which is no surprise. that's their job, to trick you into incriminating yourself.

    if you think about it, someone who is witholding a confession is also, in a way, encrypting the information about the crime that took place.

  19. Re:No Carrier on Ask Slashdot: Living Without Internet At-Home Access? · · Score: 1

    fuckin A right. the sanest thing i've seen anyone write in about 20 years.

  20. Re:Punish Trolls on Lawyer Attempts To Trademark Bitcoin · · Score: 1
  21. Re:Love? on The Science of Human-Robot Love · · Score: 1

    i'm gonna have to add that word to my sig list of slashdot memes. i love it when people just throw this word around every time they miss the point.

  22. Re:First! on Future Actions Predicted From Brain Activity · · Score: 0

    ok, let's go with your plan. only safe bet is to eliminate the human species. let's get started, you first. wait, crap that was me. dammit!

  23. Re:Love? on The Science of Human-Robot Love · · Score: 0

    fourth stage PROFIT!!

  24. First! on Future Actions Predicted From Brain Activity · · Score: -1

    Pre-Crime begins...

  25. Re:Of course its financially feasible. on Spamming Becoming Financially Infeasible · · Score: 1

    wow, you get around 800 spam emails that slip past your filters? sucks to be you, i'd change email providers if i were you. sounds like their filters are virtually non-existant. i check my email (also had it for 15 years) once every ~4-10 days, and only have to manually remove about ~5-8 spam emails. i also don't aggregate tons of other accounts into my main one, that would be stupid. i use my other accounts as spam traps for dumb shit i have to sign up for. e.g., if i were to make a youtube account to watch censored videos it would be with my spam email account.

    tell me you've heard of this before. i can't help but think you must be one of those morons that falls for phishing attempts, or fills out those surveys so you can watch pirated sports streams or answers those stupid facebook app requests. 800 spam emails a day after filters, you are Robert Soloway's wet dream. wipe your chin, it's dripping.