Slashdot Mirror


User: Kickasso

Kickasso's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
667
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 667

  1. Re:It's 4am on New Doom Details · · Score: 1

    Cool fact of the day: the earth is round!
    --

  2. Re:Can You Cogently Explain Why Javascript is Bad? on Full Frontal Quickies · · Score: 1

    Yes.
    --

  3. Re:Nice on 486 PC In 5 Cubic Inches? · · Score: 2
    Of course you're right. Which brings us to the following advice:

    Gentle Slashdot authors, there's a "Search" button at the bottom of each Slasdot page. Please use it.
    --

  4. Re:Just 2 seconds... on Classic Browsers Given New Life · · Score: 1
    From Netcraft:

    dejavu.org is running Netscape-FastTrack/3.01 on Compaq Tru64 UNIX

    Makes one really wonder...
    --

  5. Re:"standards" on Ericsson And Red Hat In Home Communications · · Score: 1
    Here's one difference for you: Sun has vetoing povers.

    By the way standards have nothing to do with code, or forking thereof. And oh, yes, I never said I love committees.
    --

  6. Re:Can You Cogently Explain Why Javascript is Bad? on Full Frontal Quickies · · Score: 1
    I think it would be a fairly simple matter to modify the Junkbuster source code to filter out SCRIPT tags

    No it would not. Junkbuster doesn't filters bodies of pages, just headers. You have to add a whole bunch of new code, with HTML parser and all.

    Besides it will not work on secure sites. The best solution is to hack an open-source browser.
    --

  7. Re:Petition to Ban the Spammers on Postcard From Linuxbierwanderung 2000 · · Score: 1
    An idea for the next poll.

    Will you miss the MDMA guy?

    • No
    • Hell no!
    • I browse at +4, who's the MDMA guy?
    • Hemos

    --
  8. Re:"standards" on Ericsson And Red Hat In Home Communications · · Score: 1

    The difference is that HTML and POSIX (and C and C++) are designed by committees/consortiums/whatever which you (theoretically at least) can join and become a voting member. Java is not. I'm not saying that one way is better than another.
    --

  9. Re:Wooden mirror on SIGGRAPH 2000 Review · · Score: 2

    Somewhat related: Digital Light Processing.
    --

  10. Re:"standards" on Ericsson And Red Hat In Home Communications · · Score: 1

    OK. So Java isn't very open to change. Is it necessarily a bad thing? Look what they did with C++. I'd rather let Bjarne control the damn thing :)
    --

  11. Re:"standards" on Ericsson And Red Hat In Home Communications · · Score: 1
    Java does have a publicly available written specification. Word doesn't.

    But you used the word "malleable". Please explain what do you mean (I've already checked my dictionary, thanks).
    --

  12. Re:chanting the code on "If You Can Put It On A T-Shirt, It's Speech" · · Score: 1
    More ideas.
    • Get a powerful laser (couple of kilowatts should be enough), point it to the Moon (preferably when it's new), and modulate with DeCSS source.
    • Everybody puts one line of DeCSS source to their .sig and starts posting to Usenet.
    • XOR it with the text of US Constitution and distribute that.
    • Write a long story in such a way that CRC8 checksum of Nth line is the Nth byte of DeCSS.
    Should be fun to watch all this stuff banned...
    --
  13. Re:Define random. Or information. Or both on "If You Can Put It On A T-Shirt, It's Speech" · · Score: 1
    I know I'm going to regret getting into this but...

    Start regretting now.

    You having no information is not the same as the string having no information. I may not have the key to a locked room but that doesn't mean it must be empty.

    This particular encryption system (known as one-time pad BTW) is interesting: the key and the message are mathematically indistinguishable. So you cannot ban just the message, or just the key, because you don't know where's the message and where's the key.

    In other words, there's no key, just a message split in two halves. You must have both halves in order to reconstruct the message.

    Also, in the string 010101010101 any given bit has a 50/50 chance of being 0 or 1 but it ain't random.

    No, in the string 010101010101 odd bits and even bits have unequal chances of being either 0 or 1. So I can easily predict what the next bit will be.

    If you have A = B xor C and C is random, so is A. If you cannot predict bits of C, you cannot predict bits of A.

    By the way this illustrates why the key and the ciphertext are indistinguishable: if ciphertext = plaintext xor key, then key = plaintext xor ciphertext.
    --

  14. This I don't understand. on "If You Can Put It On A T-Shirt, It's Speech" · · Score: 2
    DMCA doesn't talk about decryption programs. It mentions circumvention devices. To be banned a circumvention device should not have significant non-circumvention uses.

    Now, it's clear to me that:

    • a T-shirt is not a circumvention device (I cannot decrypt DVDs with a T-shirt)
    • it does have significant non-circumvention uses (I can wear it)
    I hope MPAA wil be laughed out of court on this one.
    --
  15. GPLNet is not an appropriate name. on Freenet Music Venture; Napster-like ROM Swapping · · Score: 1

    Either TrojaNET or ViruSWAP would be better.
    --

  16. Re:Of course they made it ... on Microbes Survive Space Trip · · Score: 1

    What do you mean "lost"? It's in Murmansk. You, from all people, should know.
    --

  17. Re:Long-term evolution of the Universe on Simulating Life On The Red Planet · · Score: 1
    the bits about the availability of energy from gravitational shear in a collapsing Universe may have validity

    Good luck using this energy in the sea of X particles :)

    when you aren't concerned with timescales then the amount doesn't matter.

    IIRC if you have X joules of energy, you can flip Y bits, regardless of how slow you go. But then again, I may be wrong. Don't quote me on this.

    what about a way to extract energy from the expansion of space-time?

    Or from $3 crack? It seems there's an infinite amount of it floating around. :)
    --

  18. Re:Long-term evolution of the Universe on Simulating Life On The Red Planet · · Score: 1
    The Physics of Immortality? Last time I checked, /. has Science category but not Crackpot Science. But of course there are always secret sids...

    As for the second possibility, I really don't know. Don't quantum effects prevent you from running on arbitrary low power, or something?
    --

  19. Re:Interesting, but is there a point? on Simulating Life On The Red Planet · · Score: 1
    We're all doomed anyway, because one day ALL stars will die. Either that, or Big Crunch. Have another beer.

    Of course we probably will be winked out of existance much, much sooner, but those are hard limits.
    --

  20. Re:NYT violates copyright? on NYT On DeCSS Case · · Score: 1
    I tried, and all I got was a picture of a lousy T-shirt... errmm... I mean, a picture of Copyleft (reversed ©). The code itself is just too small.

    Not that I need it; I'm wearing this shirt right now :)
    --

  21. Re:PGP Case? on NYT On DeCSS Case · · Score: 1
    1. No.
    2. Probably not.

    --
  22. Re:Not EVEN a planet... on Delaying Our Visit To The Last Planet · · Score: 1

    If you insist that trace quantities of whatever gasses around Mercury constitute an atmosphere, then our Moon has atmosphere too!
    --

  23. Re:Not EVEN a planet... on Delaying Our Visit To The Last Planet · · Score: 2

    The same picture says that Ganymede and Titan are larger than Mercury. Does it mean that Mercury is not a planet, or that Ganymede and Titan are planets?
    --

  24. Re:Get used to it: Quantum Cryptoanalysis on New Zealand Government To Snoop On E-mail · · Score: 2
    quantum computer will be able to factor large primes

    But I can factor arbitrarily large primes without any computer! OTOH factoring composite numbers is a bit tricky.
    --

  25. Re:this is pointless in the general case on Natural Language CLIs? · · Score: 1
    Inference rules and real-world knowledge are not fundamentally different. I know of a project that represented them identically. Oh, and grammar rules too! It was really cool. You could tell the system (more or less):
    • Sky is blue
    • Plurals end with "s"
    • _X knows that _Y and _X says "not _Y" => _X is being ironic or sarcastic
    I simplify a lot of course.

    The plan was to "raise" something more or less AI-ish much like children are raised. The project didn't fly but there are plans to revive it.
    --