No need to send actual people. I'm sure we'll soon be able to design machines that can assemble human DNA from scratch, gestate it in atificial wombs, and then rear the resulting young. As always, it is an engineering problem, just not the way you thought.
Now imagine the mental health problems of childen raised by machines.
You see, just to keep the right wing nut-jobs happy a market based solution was invented (one that had already worked for similar problems).
But that was based on the false idea that the right wing nut-jobs wanted a solution, so it failed.
We're probably going to get carbon taxes because of that.
Please watch the video I link to in my sig. It has a very nice man who explains to you why the right wing must get its head out of its arse as quickly as possible.
Nobody "hid" anything - they found that the most recent tree ring data didn't match the temperature data as well as the earlier tree ring data did. They wrote papers about it. It was a well known problem.
The tree ring data isn't invalid, it just has its limits.
Recall one of the many dramas of climategate was the private discussion of the discarding of tree ring data from after 1960 precisely because it failed as a temperature proxy.
"Private discussion"? People wrote fucking papers about it. Jacoby 1995 and Briffa 1998 for example.
India produces around 4500 metric tonnes a year. China makes similar amounts, but uses most of it "in the production of Dicofol, an acaricide"
An estimated 5,000 metric tons of DDT (active ingredient) was used for disease vector control in 2005. The primary use is for malaria control, but approximately 1,000 metric tons/year (20% of global consumption) is used for control of visceral leishmaniasis restricted to India.
Your worries about the price due to the lack of a US market seem to be unconfirmed.
Even PGP isn't sufficient, since it doesn't protect key portions of the mail (To:, From:, Subject:, message length, etc) from observation.
Well, yes and no.
It is possible to use rfc822 leaving most of the headers absent (some things will get filled in in flight - "Received" for example).
The SMTP (rfc821) "envelope" information has to be available to the MTA at least temporarily (MAIL FROM and RCPT TO). It can be protected in flight by TLS and the provider has no need to save it.
If you receive normal email through SMTP, the provider must be able to read the email as it arrives
No, just the RFC821 envelope information, not th RFC822 header or body information.
I.E. a mail exchange could look like:
MAIL FROM:<redacted> RCPT TO:<this has to be in clear, sorry> DATA Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: application/x-nsa-suck-my-donkey-balls
some encrypted shit .
The only thing that has to be in clear is the argument to RCPT TO.
However, any decent historian can tell you that the intention of the 1st Amendment was to prevent the government from punishing dissidents for criticizing the government.
Slashdot Mirror
Well, ok, in Russia you're not free to shove frozen chickens up your cunt.
Of course it's a joke you idiot,
You don't.
Secure mail is only secure if it's end-to-end.
Is it?
AOSP?
N900?
Using the term denier in a scientific debate demonstrates you have no understanding whatsoever how science works.
This is not a scientific debate. This is slashdot.
They could have used to same explanation to delete 12% or 18% and ended up with any result they wanted
But they didn't.
Dishonest people often have difficulty believing that honest people are honest - "oh, you're cheating when my back is turned".
So, you've looked at the figures from Mauna Lua and can point to the moments where CO2 from the volcano clearly distorted the signal.
Or you have an explanation for how the curve is nice and smooth - maybe Manua Lua is emitting more CO2 over time?
Maybe you have an explanation for why the curves from other stations are more or less exactly the same as Manua Lua?
Attention to detail:
Dit Dit Dit
De De
Dit Dit Dit
Apple - a-historicat losers.
Where is the straw?
They were just hiding data that didn't agree with their conclusions.
Writing peer-reviewed papers in published journals is a pretty poor way of "hiding data".
The data which they "hid" by telling the world about didn't "disagree with their conclusions".
Please link your evidence of less vulnerabilities for iOS or you are just showing your raging fanboyism.
Fewer, FFS
I would have corrected the "wfi" to "wifi" but I'm using a shitty android tablet and it sometimes goes crazy with slashdot
in summary - wfi is shit, so why is anyone supprised thar googles wifi is shit?
+++ THIS.
Do it yourself.
Lets have secret conclaves to hide information that has been publicly available for 10 years.
Newtonian mechanics don't work under some conditions.
That doesn't mean that we throw them away, it just means that we only use them under the conditions where they work.
No need to send actual people. I'm sure we'll soon be able to design machines that can assemble human DNA from scratch, gestate it in atificial wombs, and then rear the resulting young. As always, it is an engineering problem, just not the way you thought.
Now imagine the mental health problems of childen raised by machines.
You see, just to keep the right wing nut-jobs happy a market based solution was invented (one that had already worked for similar problems).
But that was based on the false idea that the right wing nut-jobs wanted a solution, so it failed.
We're probably going to get carbon taxes because of that.
Please watch the video I link to in my sig. It has a very nice man who explains to you why the right wing must get its head out of its arse as quickly as possible.
Have you not been paying attention for the last six months? The AGW establishment has admitted the pause and are scrambling to find the reason.
http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/uah/from:1998/plot/uah/from:1998/trend/plot/uah/from:1997/trend/plot/uah/from:1999/trend
Wonder why you are so interested in 1998? Like the taste of cherries?
So the grandparent's claim (that there is nothing to worry about, since it was warmer then and nothing happened) is utterly baseless, then?
Denialism is obviously a quantum effect - we know the MO was warmer and simultaneously we don't know what the temperature was.
In order to collapse the wave function we need an observer, and the denialists are dont seem tp be aware enough to count.
Nobody "hid" anything - they found that the most recent tree ring data didn't match the temperature data as well as the earlier tree ring data did. They wrote papers about it. It was a well known problem.
The tree ring data isn't invalid, it just has its limits.
Recall one of the many dramas of climategate was the private discussion of the discarding of tree ring data from after 1960 precisely because it failed as a temperature proxy.
"Private discussion"? People wrote fucking papers about it. Jacoby 1995 and Briffa 1998 for example.
Aha, some numbers.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2801202/
DDT is mostly made in India. and China.
India produces around 4500 metric tonnes a year. China makes similar amounts, but uses most of it "in the production of Dicofol, an acaricide"
An estimated 5,000 metric tons of DDT (active ingredient) was used for disease vector control in 2005. The primary use is for malaria control, but approximately 1,000 metric tons/year (20% of global consumption) is used for control of visceral leishmaniasis restricted to India.
Your worries about the price due to the lack of a US market seem to be unconfirmed.
Even PGP isn't sufficient, since it doesn't protect key portions of the mail (To:, From:, Subject:, message length, etc) from observation.
Well, yes and no.
It is possible to use rfc822 leaving most of the headers absent (some things will get filled in in flight - "Received" for example).
The SMTP (rfc821) "envelope" information has to be available to the MTA at least temporarily (MAIL FROM and RCPT TO). It can be protected in flight by TLS and the provider has no need to save it.
If you receive normal email through SMTP, the provider must be able to read the email as it arrives
No, just the RFC821 envelope information, not th RFC822 header or body information.
I.E. a mail exchange could look like:
The only thing that has to be in clear is the argument to RCPT TO.
However, any decent historian can tell you that the intention of the 1st Amendment was to prevent the government from punishing dissidents for criticizing the government.
Now explain the sedition act?
He also vetoed more bills as a governor of New Mexico than any other governor, from any other state, in history (if my memory serves me correctly).
Nice. But could we have a list of the bills he vetoed? Quality counts, not just quantity.
Never been to prison, eh?