Madoff ripped off a lot of people's life savings, and some of them took a real drop in quality of life. Move into the 'can't afford to see a doctor - maybe this symptom will just go away' group, and you lose up to six years from your average life expectancy by some estimates.
So if Madoff is guilty of murder for this what do feel about the people who campaign against "socialised" health care?
Having never seen any AT&T Unix code newer than the reprint of Lions' A commentary on the Unix Operating System, (based on V6 - 1975) and the "ancient" Unix source from The Unix Heritage Society.
Caldera's only good action, ever, was releasing that.
(Solaris was based on SVR4, UnixWare is SVR4.2 (SVR5 for marketing porpoises) - the major differences should be in the security stuff (SVR4.1ES) and the multiprocessor stuff (SRV4.2MP). The rest should be pretty much the same).
The only interesting stuff is the bits [T]SCO[G] don't own - the Veritas filesytstem and volume manager.
You've already seen the kernel - it's mostly the same as Solaris. (Slightly different multiprocessor code. I'd expect that Solaris's is better by now).
Microsoft no longer owns Xenix, SCO does (no seriously). SCO Unix is Xenix.
You gotta love slashdot mods: "informative" my ass.
SCO Unix is not Xenix. SCO Unix is not even Xenix compatible.
Here's what happened:
Microsoft write their first Operating system, a 16 bit version of Unix for the 8086, called Xenix because at that point you weren't allowed to call it Unix unless you were AT&T.
SCO buy a license to Xenix and make some 286 versions of it.
AT&T and Interactive port Unix SVR3 to the 386
SCO ports Xenix to the 386
AT&T and SCO make Unix SVR3.2, which is Xenix compatible, for the 386. At this point if you boot Unix SVR3.2 you see a Microsoft copyright,
SCO starts selling SCO Unix (SVR3.2), eventually abandoning Xenix, but still paying licensing to Microsoft for the Xenix compatibility code.
AT&T and Sun produce Unix SVR4, merging some Sunos stuff into SysV, still licensing stuff from Microsoft
AT&T and Novell produce UnixWare, SVR4.2, still licensing stuff from Microsoft
AT&T sells Unix to Novell
Novell sells UnixWare (but not Unix) to SCO
SCO produces various versions of UnixWare, still paying licensing to Microsoft. It starts proceedings against Microsoft (In the European court of justice AFAIR) and was finally released from the licensing deal if it removed the Xenix compatibility code from UnixWare, which it did.
SCO was still selling SCO Unix (now SCO OpenServer) the SVR3.4 based system which includes the Xenix compatibility code alongside UnixWare, which now didn't.
SCO sells UnixWare and OpenServer to Caldera (it's more complicated than that, but...)
Caldera (having renamed themselves [T]SCO[G]) replace the SVR3.2 kernel in OpenServer with the "SVR5" (SVR4.2 renamed for marketing reasons) kernel from UnixWare, so OpenServer no longer needs licensing from Microsoft.
So not only do [T]SCO[G] not own Xenix, they don't sell Xenix, and they aren't even Xenix compatible.
Maybe I obsess to much about this nonsense? See my pseudo.
According to their own summary of the interview with political scientist Steffen Hertog, 'nearly half of [individuals involved in political violence] with degrees have been engineers,' a rather ambiguous statement
What's ambiguous about that?
Clever idea to slashdot the site with the key...
on
HDCP Master Key Revealed
·
· Score: 1, Funny
So for you the fact that a "far left source" provides a link to the website of the actual person involved in the incident means that we should ignore his side of the story?
Well, I was with you there until you got to this bit:
If I say Sartre's Being and Nothingness is about smurfs, I am wrong, and deserve all the ridicule I get.
WTF? You didn't get all the Smurf references? Probably because they're called "Les Schtroumpfs" in the original French. Maybe you've been reading a bad translation.
So, if you're so keen on conspiracy, why not comment on the conspiracy to get Soon and Baliunas, 2003, published in "Climate Research"? You know, the paper that corrupted peer review by being published in a reviewed journal without peer review?
The fact that the Journal published some shit at the behest of one of its opinionated editors is of less concern. If the choice is between Opinionated Editors and Manipulated Editors, I choose opinionated.
So what is it? Sacrosanct peer review or "opinionated" editors?
You claim "I question your motives. Can I presume that you have a strong opinion about the veracity of the AGW theory? Me, not so much either way."
Slashdot Mirror
From Le Parisien, 27/12/2009.
http://www.leparisien.fr/faits-divers/un-gang-de-cambrioleurs-devalise-les-monoprix-27-12-2009-757296.php
"Le dernier fait en date remonte à la nuit du 23 au 24 novembre, avenue d'Italie dans le XIII e arrondissement de Paris."
It's my local Monoprix!
(It's in Paris, not "near Paris").
... But... but,,, that would mean tha "shock and awe" was...
I'm going to pretend you didn't say that.
You might like to research the origin of the word "guerilla".
Some stupid scottish neds stole a whole bunch of cable a while ago, burned it as usual to strip the insulation and tried to sell it.
It fibre.
Not amateurs. Drunks.
Taken out a TGV line at least once here in France. It's not unique to the States.
Oh, come on.
Americans can be irritating, but wanting them to go down in a blaze of self inflicted gunshot wounds is mean.
So if Madoff is guilty of murder for this what do feel about the people who campaign against "socialised" health care?
Market?
I pay for flash viewers?
Not very often.
Caldera's only good action, ever, was releasing that.
Go check out OpenSolaris.
(Solaris was based on SVR4, UnixWare is SVR4.2 (SVR5 for marketing porpoises) - the major differences should be in the security stuff (SVR4.1ES) and the multiprocessor stuff (SRV4.2MP). The rest should be pretty much the same).
Last I checked neither Xen nor KVM would run SCO UnixWare 7.1.1 :-(
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1391
Not worth it.
The only interesting stuff is the bits [T]SCO[G] don't own - the Veritas filesytstem and volume manager.
You've already seen the kernel - it's mostly the same as Solaris. (Slightly different multiprocessor code. I'd expect that Solaris's is better by now).
You gotta love slashdot mods: "informative" my ass.
SCO Unix is not Xenix. SCO Unix is not even Xenix compatible.
Here's what happened:
So not only do [T]SCO[G] not own Xenix, they don't sell Xenix, and they aren't even Xenix compatible.
Maybe I obsess to much about this nonsense? See my pseudo.
Worse than that - SCO sold UnixWare to Caldera. SCO then renamed themselves Tarentella and Caldera renamed themselves [T]SCO[G]
Now [T]SCO[G] wants to sell whatever they bought from SCO (Tarantella).
Power?
Mips?
Arm64?
Sparc64?
Just given up the fight to Intel/AMD? Lie back and enjoy it.
Pity it's only x86-64.
Guess that's the problem with closed source.
Definition of "had sex with"?
Dark brown on amber for me - die greenscreen scum!
Chuck Norris is a pussy.
What's ambiguous about that?
... so nobody can get hold of it.
So for you the fact that a "far left source" provides a link to the website of the actual person involved in the incident means that we should ignore his side of the story?
Well, I was with you there until you got to this bit:
WTF? You didn't get all the Smurf references? Probably because they're called "Les Schtroumpfs" in the original French. Maybe you've been reading a bad translation.
Irrelevant Wikipedia reference to like totally prove my point: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Les_Schtroumpfs.
So, if you're so keen on conspiracy, why not comment on the conspiracy to get Soon and Baliunas, 2003, published in "Climate Research"? You know, the paper that corrupted peer review by being published in a reviewed journal without peer review?
So what is it? Sacrosanct peer review or "opinionated" editors?
You claim "I question your motives. Can I presume that you have a strong opinion about the veracity of the AGW theory? Me, not so much either way."
You lie.
What are you trying to say?
That December 2, 2009 is not recent? This is all about events that took place in 2003.
What's your point?