That many packages are hard depending on an interface to an init/whateverthehellitis that may not be present (all though it takes some trying) is 'bad',
That is totally untrue -- classic unix had all tools on the same source tree. Not that that had anything to do with philosophy, it was just the way it was done.
If you don't want systemd then don't install systemd.
libsystemd isn't systemd. It's a library which is a no-op if systemd isn't installed. In fact one of the main reasons for it's existence is to make sure that packages don't need to depend on systemd.
If you're worried libsystemd will do something bad to you then just review it's code -- it's tiny.
libudev1 doesn't depend on systemd. It installs perfectly well om machines were systemd isn't installed and it runs perfectly well on machines where systemd isn't pid 1.
Why do you care what directory the source code is in?
libudev1 is a systemd library and maintained by the systemd maintainers.
libsystemd1 is a no-op if systemd is not installed. What is your problem? Do you think you'll catch systemd cooties if the name of any package on your system contains the letters d, e, m, s, t or y?
Even the USSR at its high point would not have been able to kill 90% of the US population with massive missile strike.
France currently has around 300 warheads. If it had delivery mechanisms for all of them capable of hitting the US that could mean at least one bomb for every city with over 100,000 population.
That's about 88 million people in the cities hit.
The USSR had rather more that 300 warheads deliverable.
So a journalist becomes persona non grata with Apple, can't get information about The New Big Thing until long after their competitors have published articles about it, so they get a reputation for being slow to publish about new stuff and probably end up with a reputation for recycling other peoples information because they can't get anything from Apple.
Slashdot Mirror
Starring in crappy films with shitty stories and idiotic directors harms actors careers?
Who'd a thunk it.
Eight of 17 reactors have been shut down, so you're right, it's not "most", it's just "half of them".
Where do you get "two or three"? Are you confusing Germany with Belgium?
Most isotopes are poisonous ... regardless how active they are.
Runner up for dumbest statement ever, only beaten my "most food contains chemicals".
When it goes wrong, it renders a different large area of land [uninhabited].
FTFY.
The Earth's climate is always on a continuum and humans have always survived.
Thare have been "climactic" conditions in the past that humans might not thrive in. (Like lack of free oxygen in the atmosphere for example).
They prove that string concatenation (in memory) is slower than writing to buffers (in memory).
I.E. that :
is slower than:
What a fucking joke.
No, in the case of the "paper" cited it depends on the gross stupidity of the algorithm.
They're comparing:
With
For fucks sake!
Please, do elucidate -- how is the code a mess?
That many packages are hard depending on an interface to an init/whateverthehellitis that may not be present (all though it takes some trying) is 'bad',
But why is it bad?
That is totally untrue -- classic unix had all tools on the same source tree. Not that that had anything to do with philosophy, it was just the way it was done.
That was the way it used to work, and in C at least the way it's exposed is the unsigned type.
You still haven't explained what sucks.
Why not?
If you don't want systemd then don't install systemd.
libsystemd isn't systemd. It's a library which is a no-op if systemd isn't installed. In fact one of the main reasons for it's existence is to make sure that packages don't need to depend on systemd.
If you're worried libsystemd will do something bad to you then just review it's code -- it's tiny.
Fuck off you idiot troll.
So what?
libudev1 doesn't depend on systemd. It installs perfectly well om machines were systemd isn't installed and it runs perfectly well on machines where systemd isn't pid 1.
Why do you care what directory the source code is in?
libudev1 is a systemd library and maintained by the systemd maintainers.
libsystemd1 is a no-op if systemd is not installed. What is your problem? Do you think you'll catch systemd cooties if the name of any package on your system contains the letters d, e, m, s, t or y?
Naturally they say that libsystemd0 is not systemd just an interface to it,
Naturally they say that because it's true.
but still try getting rid of it.
Try getting rid of libselinux1 (and that was written by the NSA!)
Just what exactly do you think libsystemd0 does if systemd is not pid 1?
A do-ocracy became a paid-to-do-ocracy and those involved seem to think that that is the same thing.
Who do you think is paid to work on Debian? (LTS aside)
What has been renamed? udev is still called udev.
udev doesn't depend on systemd.
So far as I know, gvfs is dependent on udev, not systemd.
It depends on libudev1. libudev1 doesn't even depend on udev.
libudev1 and udev come from the same source package as systemd. Maybe people think they can catch cooties from it?
At least on Debian the GVFS has a hard requirement on systemd.
R U Sure?
Nope, no depenancy on systemd.
I get tired of saying this, but it's true. The only Debian package that depends on systemd is gummiboot.
So, now it's "flamebait" to say that Gnome 3 is pretty good. Hahaha.
Even the USSR at its high point would not have been able to kill 90% of the US population with massive missile strike.
France currently has around 300 warheads. If it had delivery mechanisms for all of them capable of hitting the US that could mean at least one bomb for every city with over 100,000 population.
That's about 88 million people in the cities hit.
The USSR had rather more that 300 warheads deliverable.
So a journalist becomes persona non grata with Apple, can't get information about The New Big Thing until long after their competitors have published articles about it, so they get a reputation for being slow to publish about new stuff and probably end up with a reputation for recycling other peoples information because they can't get anything from Apple.
The famous example was El Reg.
Come on, this is Slashdot, I mention TANSTAFL and everyone is supposed to bow down the old man.
What are you, some kind of heretic?