And I know, I know.. it's only rich people benefitting and they shouldn't be allowed to have money because the noble poor deserve their nannies or some shit or another... I can never remember the whole screed.
I'm going to say "WHY DIDN'T YOU WARN ME HOLDME? WHY DID I READ YOUR CRAP AND THINK YOU WERE SOME SORT OF LOW LEVEL RETARD? WHY?"
But since it's not going to happen and it's all just some weird, dark, paranoid fantasy that lives only in your head, you're safe from having to deal with that.
No, it's because you're a sheep and the corporations man, they're holding you down because profit is evil and you're a sheep and you buy what you're told to buy and you like what you're told to like and BAH BAH mutherfucker, it's the corporations man.
Teaching will be a high-paying job when it stops attracting simpering morons.
Education has three massive faults - the children are lazy and coddled, the parents are lazy and whiny, and the teachers are lazy and entitled. Technology certainly won't solve any of those issues. Nor will tracking test scores, or aiming to increase them, or blaming the teaching tools.
You can of course not buy a product that doesn't meet your needs. I know that contravenes your right to have everything you want, but hey! that's what happens when you try to apply "morality" to something as unsuitable as video games.
Ah, so you figure if you wrap up your opinions in the drapery of "fact" then that makes it so. I see, I see. Very good. Totally what I expected you to do.
Slashdot Mirror
And I know, I know.. it's only rich people benefitting and they shouldn't be allowed to have money because the noble poor deserve their nannies or some shit or another... I can never remember the whole screed.
Everything is obvious! Give it away because the people demand it! FREE THE WORKERS (from getting paid for their work.)
So all that effort somehow makes it obvious?
I'm not sure I follow all of these rebuttals. When you need to torture the logic that much, it should be obvious you're reaching.
Perhaps wherever you are. In the US, it certainly is, totally in the most.
So if two people out of 7 billion+ come up with something, it's obvious?
Ahh, a good old anonymous utopian.
At least Slashdot will never run out of idealists who think forcing their "morals" on everybody else is the solution to everything.
Well, we should all take turns shitting on it then. That seems like a reasonable response.
How could Google let someone so important on that deathtrap? Some broad gets on with a staticky sweater and it's "Oh the humanity!"
I'm going to say "WHY DIDN'T YOU WARN ME HOLDME? WHY DID I READ YOUR CRAP AND THINK YOU WERE SOME SORT OF LOW LEVEL RETARD? WHY?"
But since it's not going to happen and it's all just some weird, dark, paranoid fantasy that lives only in your head, you're safe from having to deal with that.
No, it's because you're a sheep and the corporations man, they're holding you down because profit is evil and you're a sheep and you buy what you're told to buy and you like what you're told to like and BAH BAH mutherfucker, it's the corporations man.
Do you think that dressing up your ridiculous opinions like they're facts gives them more weight?
You're so cute when you're being retarded.
Teaching will be a high-paying job when it stops attracting simpering morons.
Education has three massive faults - the children are lazy and coddled, the parents are lazy and whiny, and the teachers are lazy and entitled. Technology certainly won't solve any of those issues. Nor will tracking test scores, or aiming to increase them, or blaming the teaching tools.
What sort of valid conclusions can one draw from tracking test scores over time? And why is the immediate reaction "blame the tool"?
Ahh, yet another Slashdot economics genius. You guys rule, you're my second favorite Slashdot stereotype after the free entertainment crowd.
You can of course not buy a product that doesn't meet your needs. I know that contravenes your right to have everything you want, but hey! that's what happens when you try to apply "morality" to something as unsuitable as video games.
It's just a child (or childlike person) who doesn't realize their personal greed for entertainment is not a compelling moral system.
30 people per car in the peak of rush hour? I guess you don't ride a lot of subways.
Lighten up, Francis.
The hyperbole, it burns!
No, predicting the future is retardation.
Ah, so you figure if you wrap up your opinions in the drapery of "fact" then that makes it so. I see, I see. Very good. Totally what I expected you to do.
Ah, the old "you don't do things my way so you're a sociopath" argument.
Excellent adjunct to the article's "you don't do things my way so you're an idiot" position. Did you guys coordinate on this?
Ahhh, so if you tightly define things to highly specialized cases using rules you don't communicate, it works perfectly.
I guess we just need you to write everything ever.
Do you figure if you just make shit up, it somehow gives your point credence?