I agree. I have a friend who works, I think, for Office Max. He can't get promoted because of some stupid felony charge from before he ever worked for Office Max. And this is a Navy veteran, to boot.
There is nothing incorrect about having a web server whose hostname does not start with www. To imply that there is shows a lack of understanding about what a hostname is.
The prefix of www is only a required part of the hostname in a URL when either the only hostname of the box starts with www or if the web server is configured to only respond to requests when the hostname starts with www.
There is nothing at all magical about www in a hostname. You could easily setup a web server that only responds to a hostname starting with ftp or gopher.
On the flip side, if a server is not configured to respond to a hostname starting with www, it won't ever work.
If you buy a piece of hardware, you are entitled to use every single transistor in the package. It is 100% legal to change or replace the software in order to enable bits that the stock software does not enable.
Hardware cannot be copyrighted. If you own the hardware, you are free to do anything you like with it. You are not licensing it. You cannot "steal" "content" by enabling bits of it.
I understand where you are coming from on this, but either the CPU is Intel-compatible or its not. Unless TBB includes assembly code, it's rather unlikely they could write C++ that is intentionally crippled on AMD CPUs.
Well, the real problem I have with sexism is that its definition has been expanded to include anything that points out a difference between genders, whether real or imagined.
Men and women are different. Physically, physiologically, biologically and even logically! Men and women don't think the same ways. This is all proven science.
The notion of sexism is practically sexism itself.
PC games have, for decades now, been written to use locally available hardware when present and to handle different screen resolutions. Why must Flash be any different?
How is it perfectly clear that Israel started the war? Oh right, it's perfectly OK to violate a sovereign border and kidnap, torture and kill soldiers. That's not an act of war.
According to the "Palestinians", the war never ended, so it's not actually possible for Israel to strike first. In a current sense. I don't know who actually struck first 80 years ago, and I bet no one alive does.
Ignoring those that convert, being Jewish requires being born of a Jewish mother. It's really that simple.
Of course the Reform movement within Judaism has been trying to redefine "Jewishness" as having either parent be Jewish, but that is not the historical definition.
Historically, as in going back to the furthest source to talk about the issue (the Talmud), being Jewish requires a valid Conversion or birth from a Jewish mother. That's it. Just because modern pieces of shit make up their own rules doesn't mean one is religious when one ignores those "rules".
Most states in the US limit or ban the sale of wine on Sundays and Christmas is a legal national holiday. Is the US a religious country too?
Far more is said about Israeli "atrocities" than "Palestinian".
And I put "Palestinian" in quotes because there has NEVER in history been a nation called Palestine. They are Arabs. That's it.
The state called Palestine was the JEWISH state of Israel, which was named Palestine by the Roman conquerors. So Palestinians are either Jews or Romans. Certainly not Arabs, who did not live in the area at all, except as nomads.
Israel cannot end the war except by ceasing to exist. So you do actually support genocide and you are just lying.
You have never been to Israel, so you have no idea how people live there. Arabs, Christians, Jews and secular peoples of all kinds live peacefully together in many places in the country. You only hear of the conflict along the borders and you think that represents the entire country.
That would be like saying the US is comprised of murderous gangs if all you hear are reports of inner-city violence.
You deserve to die, painfully, for your sheer, unmitigated stupidity.
First of all, the USB IF is not enforcing anything. They are, however, upset with Palm for LYING. I hope you fucking die because someone lies to you about something important. You are an unethical piece of shit and don't deserve to exist.
Apple does not have anything close to a monopoly on anything. Amazon started their music store well after Apple. It seems to be doing well. Prices are pretty much the same anywhere you go, and certainly Apple is not the cheapest. So obviously Apple is not able to dictate the prices for online music sales. Apple has no real control over the market of online music sales, and certainly no control that harms consumers in any way.
Majority share is not the same as having a monopoly. Once shit-heads like you understand this, slashdot might be a better place.
Slashdot Mirror
I agree. I have a friend who works, I think, for Office Max. He can't get promoted because of some stupid felony charge from before he ever worked for Office Max. And this is a Navy veteran, to boot.
Advertisement and good/honest are rather extreme opposites.
And apparently intelligence and Hurricane78 share the same relationship.
There is nothing incorrect about having a web server whose hostname does not start with www. To imply that there is shows a lack of understanding about what a hostname is.
The prefix of www is only a required part of the hostname in a URL when either the only hostname of the box starts with www or if the web server is configured to only respond to requests when the hostname starts with www.
There is nothing at all magical about www in a hostname. You could easily setup a web server that only responds to a hostname starting with ftp or gopher.
On the flip side, if a server is not configured to respond to a hostname starting with www, it won't ever work.
If you buy a piece of hardware, you are entitled to use every single transistor in the package. It is 100% legal to change or replace the software in order to enable bits that the stock software does not enable.
Hardware cannot be copyrighted. If you own the hardware, you are free to do anything you like with it. You are not licensing it. You cannot "steal" "content" by enabling bits of it.
Objective C's garbage collection is not available on the iPhone, and hopefully never will be.
Any programmer who prefers Java to Objective C or C is an idiot.
But I say that because I think Java is the worst language to be created since C++.
The PC gaming platform does not represent recurring revenue for Microsoft.
You shouldn't be an unmitigated idiot and asshole, but you are.
Sometimes shit happens.
Chances are you were the only one working on your online business, so chances are that you were indeed the only one not to claim benefits.
I understand where you are coming from on this, but either the CPU is Intel-compatible or its not. Unless TBB includes assembly code, it's rather unlikely they could write C++ that is intentionally crippled on AMD CPUs.
Well, the real problem I have with sexism is that its definition has been expanded to include anything that points out a difference between genders, whether real or imagined.
Men and women are different. Physically, physiologically, biologically and even logically! Men and women don't think the same ways. This is all proven science.
The notion of sexism is practically sexism itself.
PC games have, for decades now, been written to use locally available hardware when present and to handle different screen resolutions. Why must Flash be any different?
The real question is why WB doesn't owe him several billion dollars for piracy.
You do have this freedom with the iPhone. Apple does not make it easy, they don't support or sanction it. But it is possible.
You have an odd definition for "failure". Mine places it as the opposite of success. BeOS does not exist in the market. It is a failure.
You have listed what may be the primary reason for its failure, but that doesn't change the fact that it failed.
How is it perfectly clear that Israel started the war? Oh right, it's perfectly OK to violate a sovereign border and kidnap, torture and kill soldiers. That's not an act of war.
Fucking idiot.
According to the "Palestinians", the war never ended, so it's not actually possible for Israel to strike first. In a current sense. I don't know who actually struck first 80 years ago, and I bet no one alive does.
Ignoring those that convert, being Jewish requires being born of a Jewish mother. It's really that simple.
Of course the Reform movement within Judaism has been trying to redefine "Jewishness" as having either parent be Jewish, but that is not the historical definition.
Historically, as in going back to the furthest source to talk about the issue (the Talmud), being Jewish requires a valid Conversion or birth from a Jewish mother. That's it. Just because modern pieces of shit make up their own rules doesn't mean one is religious when one ignores those "rules".
Most states in the US limit or ban the sale of wine on Sundays and Christmas is a legal national holiday. Is the US a religious country too?
Far more is said about Israeli "atrocities" than "Palestinian".
And I put "Palestinian" in quotes because there has NEVER in history been a nation called Palestine. They are Arabs. That's it.
The state called Palestine was the JEWISH state of Israel, which was named Palestine by the Roman conquerors. So Palestinians are either Jews or Romans. Certainly not Arabs, who did not live in the area at all, except as nomads.
Israel cannot end the war except by ceasing to exist. So you do actually support genocide and you are just lying.
You have never been to Israel, so you have no idea how people live there. Arabs, Christians, Jews and secular peoples of all kinds live peacefully together in many places in the country. You only hear of the conflict along the borders and you think that represents the entire country.
That would be like saying the US is comprised of murderous gangs if all you hear are reports of inner-city violence.
You deserve to die, painfully, for your sheer, unmitigated stupidity.
First of all, the USB IF is not enforcing anything. They are, however, upset with Palm for LYING. I hope you fucking die because someone lies to you about something important. You are an unethical piece of shit and don't deserve to exist.
Palm is crippling themselves. Apple is doing nothing more than making sure that devices are not lying to iTunes. I guess in your world it's OK to lie.
Apple does not have anything close to a monopoly on anything. Amazon started their music store well after Apple. It seems to be doing well. Prices are pretty much the same anywhere you go, and certainly Apple is not the cheapest. So obviously Apple is not able to dictate the prices for online music sales. Apple has no real control over the market of online music sales, and certainly no control that harms consumers in any way.
Majority share is not the same as having a monopoly. Once shit-heads like you understand this, slashdot might be a better place.