While the kernel may perform ASLR on itself, it's primarily to protect applications. Also, if you weren't an illiterate shitbag, you'd know that Linus is talking about patches that cause programs to be killed if they trigger bugs in the kernel. All Linus wants is for warnings to be generated instead, so those bugs can be fixed. ASLR doesn't crash programs. On purpose, anyway.
Nobody said it was "tough", the GP wrote that it requires permissions. If you have root, loading a module is not really the most pressing of your security concerns.
If you are commenting on Linus's writing based on a slashdot summary, you're already a hopelessly naive idiot, and there's no point bothering with you. There's a link to the damn email right there.
Linus's point is that a bug which leads to a security issue is still just a bug. It doesn't matter whether you are looking at the kernel as a whole, or just the parts that this patch series is trying to change. Linus also did not write that all security issues are bugs, only most.
And once you go off into microkernel land, we know you're a nut.
I don't think you understand the difference between a monolithic and a micro kernel. The latter in no way prevents a driver or device from masquerading as something it is not. The very idea doesn't even make sense.
Essentially, ML can replace (parts of) systems that rely on heuristics. Anything with fixed rules, no matter how complicated the rule set, will not benefit. Why train a ML system when you can get 100% deterministic answers?
Evolution doesn't select for anything, you ignorant and stupid deadweight. You've already passed your prime and you're too stupid and/or hypocritical to admit it.
Objectively speaking, what's better than keeping ones parents alive? Just because you're an anti-social shit who raised his children to hate old people doesn't mean that rest of us are.
Who gives a shit if far future descendants even exist, much less have a better life? It's completely illogical to worry about those who have not even been conceived.
Unless your plan is a bullet to the brain, your plan will leave as a burden to someone. Now, if only you realized that you stopped being productive 2 or 3 decades ago.
For it to be contempt of court, you'd have to appear in court. Apple execs have nothing to do with the case, so their lawyers would tell them not to show.
Slashdot Mirror
How do you equate "profitable" with "hackintosh user"?
Don't try to reason with bigots. It can be fun, but it's essentially pointless.
You're a bug. Here's to hoping someone squashes you.
While the kernel may perform ASLR on itself, it's primarily to protect applications. Also, if you weren't an illiterate shitbag, you'd know that Linus is talking about patches that cause programs to be killed if they trigger bugs in the kernel. All Linus wants is for warnings to be generated instead, so those bugs can be fixed. ASLR doesn't crash programs. On purpose, anyway.
Nobody said it was "tough", the GP wrote that it requires permissions. If you have root, loading a module is not really the most pressing of your security concerns.
If you are commenting on Linus's writing based on a slashdot summary, you're already a hopelessly naive idiot, and there's no point bothering with you. There's a link to the damn email right there.
Linus's point is that a bug which leads to a security issue is still just a bug. It doesn't matter whether you are looking at the kernel as a whole, or just the parts that this patch series is trying to change. Linus also did not write that all security issues are bugs, only most.
And once you go off into microkernel land, we know you're a nut.
I don't think you understand the difference between a monolithic and a micro kernel. The latter in no way prevents a driver or device from masquerading as something it is not. The very idea doesn't even make sense.
Essentially, ML can replace (parts of) systems that rely on heuristics. Anything with fixed rules, no matter how complicated the rule set, will not benefit. Why train a ML system when you can get 100% deterministic answers?
Linus's context is entirely in terms of the kernel. If you ignore that, you write comments that are complete non-sequiturs.
I run unsigned apps on my mac, literally every day.
Longer than doesn't mean forever. So you're redundant. And so was your comment.
I don't have financial advice for you. Instead, I advise that you shove a rusty spike up your nose.
Because tapping your unlock code was even more work? Or is Android so fucked-up that you had one option or the other, but not both?
In other words, you have no plan, and you're a lying piece of shit.
Evolution doesn't select for anything, you ignorant and stupid deadweight. You've already passed your prime and you're too stupid and/or hypocritical to admit it.
Objectively speaking, what's better than keeping ones parents alive? Just because you're an anti-social shit who raised his children to hate old people doesn't mean that rest of us are.
Who gives a shit if far future descendants even exist, much less have a better life? It's completely illogical to worry about those who have not even been conceived.
Unless your plan is a bullet to the brain, your plan will leave as a burden to someone. Now, if only you realized that you stopped being productive 2 or 3 decades ago.
What if your face was ripped off and shredded?
There's also basic idea in law that what is legal in the US may be illegal in Israel and vice versa.
That assumes the lock isn't in the secure enclave. If it is, reflashing the storage won't help.
That's only true if you can't afford more lawyers than the Justice Department.
It's the way slashdot renders modern (as in 20+ years old) written communication.
For it to be contempt of court, you'd have to appear in court. Apple execs have nothing to do with the case, so their lawyers would tell them not to show.